@23:00 you've identified the mind set of the patient, one wants longer term solution, the other does not, so regardless if you are equipped to bring them longer term solutions, because they're not looking for them, it will be hard for you to provide them. That doesn't mean the acute care you give is just "isolationist" and non integrative, it's what works for them in that moment. If you are able to reach them and continue to progress them to an active lifestyle and ongoing "training" as a PT, that is great too, but yes, many who are co-pay or insurance based will only come to you when they break down. That's not a failure of the therapy, but what they want and are willing to donate and commit to. You said so yourself that those coming for FP are more oriented to overall long term health. That's a huge advantage when you're trying to promote proper active health care.
This is great as a physio who's hoping to transition to FP. I definitely agree that physios dismiss biomechanics because they don't understand how to change it and therefore lean on the psychosocial heavily to try to address peoples pain
As someone who was months away from going to physical therapy school, it’s great to hear the experiences of physical therapists that choose @functionalpatterns training despite their credentials. Thank you
Don't give up a promising career just because a few physical therapists that were not very good at their craft, and only a year out of school failed to get results with 100% of everyone. The expectations are not realistic, and their knowledge base and experience is not complete. FP is not an end all be all, there are plenty of people who it did not work for and did get injured. Naudi deletes them from his pages, but you can find them out there. Point is, it's marketing more than anything.
Y'all should have just done Gary Gray's 3dMAPS stuff, which is where Naudi got some of his ideas from. They teach you in terms that are easy to understand. No secret sauce stuff and you could have incorporated that into your existing tool box as PT's and improved efficacy rather than throw baby out with bath water.
@27:00 that is what PT's do with the biopsychosocial model too. It doesn't bother you guys that you bash physical therapy profession who have done the bulk of the research behind what you discuss you use in your training (un trained to do, no less)?
![Объяснение 12 законов Вселенной и их Применение в Жизни [ЧТОБЫ ЛЕГКО ПОЛУЧАТЬ ЖЕЛАЕМОЕ]](/img/n.gif)
I have gone down the rabbit hole, I have found what I've been looking for. I want to learn functional patterns.
Thanks for this video guys! Great stuff!
Great breakdown boys! As a physio, I totally get this. Too few factors addressed for them to even be uttering the word 'biomechanics'
What a worthwhile discussion. Thank you for this.
@23:00 you've identified the mind set of the patient, one wants longer term solution, the other does not, so regardless if you are equipped to bring them longer term solutions, because they're not looking for them, it will be hard for you to provide them. That doesn't mean the acute care you give is just "isolationist" and non integrative, it's what works for them in that moment. If you are able to reach them and continue to progress them to an active lifestyle and ongoing "training" as a PT, that is great too, but yes, many who are co-pay or insurance based will only come to you when they break down. That's not a failure of the therapy, but what they want and are willing to donate and commit to. You said so yourself that those coming for FP are more oriented to overall long term health. That's a huge advantage when you're trying to promote proper active health care.
This is great as a physio who's hoping to transition to FP. I definitely agree that physios dismiss biomechanics because they don't understand how to change it and therefore lean on the psychosocial heavily to try to address peoples pain
Really well presented from all you guys, looking forward to more relevant information in future episodes 👍
Great discussion! Very good breakdown of the ”study”!
As someone who was months away from going to physical therapy school, it’s great to hear the experiences of physical therapists that choose @functionalpatterns training despite their credentials. Thank you
Don't give up a promising career just because a few physical therapists that were not very good at their craft, and only a year out of school failed to get results with 100% of everyone. The expectations are not realistic, and their knowledge base and experience is not complete. FP is not an end all be all, there are plenty of people who it did not work for and did get injured. Naudi deletes them from his pages, but you can find them out there. Point is, it's marketing more than anything.
Y'all should have just done Gary Gray's 3dMAPS stuff, which is where Naudi got some of his ideas from. They teach you in terms that are easy to understand. No secret sauce stuff and you could have incorporated that into your existing tool box as PT's and improved efficacy rather than throw baby out with bath water.
More fantastic content, really well delivered. I’d personally like to see and hear a lot more from these guys
Great video thank you
@27:00 that is what PT's do with the biopsychosocial model too. It doesn't bother you guys that you bash physical therapy profession who have done the bulk of the research behind what you discuss you use in your training (un trained to do, no less)?