Most modern cars more or less have lower HC and CO than the ambient air. That was a big help for reducing things like smog. Many areas in California would have atrocious smog year round. As you said, CO2 is just a proxy for fuel economy. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are going up, and most scientists believe it's from burning fossil fuels - hence the push to reduce CO2 production.
But yet if you look at chart's that have Not been cherry picked, the temps are not inline with the small increase. C02 is a natural product. Plants need it to live. Last I heard of some real numbers,Co2 isn't but 0.04 percent Total. Plants start to die at 0.02 percent. We are being lied to.
@@KenKen-ui4ny Very much agree. One reason I have researched. I almost fell for this when I was a young man. I trust science has much as I trust the Government. < 0 = less than zero.
Anybody that accepts anything that politicians,their “experts”,or the media says at face value is an idiot and deserves whatever they get. (The problem is the rest of us in society get dragged along and our lives are affected by it). These are the so called “useful idiots”,those incapable or too lazy to excercise critical thinking skills,looking for someone to follow and a cause to champion to give their lives meaning that give these morons their power. Fear is an an extremely powerful weapon in propaganda. Whip people into a frenzy with fear over something and tell them you have the answers and you own them and can sell them anything. they will willingly let you control them and take away their rights if they believe it it’s for their own good. People willingly lined up to have themselves injected with an experimental chemical cocktail that was rushed into production,not knowing or caring what the possible long term side effects and health ramifications would be. Our “leaders” and their “experts” know beat and said it’s for the greater good,right? Our leaders are all altruists without hidden agendas who have our only best interests at heart. “You know what the public's like? A cage of Guinea Pigs. Good Night you stupid idiots. Good Night, you miserable slobs. They're a lot of trained seals. I toss them a dead fish and they'll flap their flippers.”
I love the science of engine management. I was so impressed with the ECM on my 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme with the E2ME carburetor. I knew exactly when that thing went into closed loop. It never failed the emissions test!
Rely great explanation of all. I'm retired ASE Cert. Master Auto Tech, L1 so I appreciate it. I found you by accident due to TV repair. Thank you, by the way.
I managed to save multiple radiators leaking between the matrix and the end cap by tightening the tabs with a vice grip. In fact, I removed the brand new, pretty expensive, but crappy Nissens (considered as quality manufacturer) one from my Audi 80 and put back the 35yrs old original, after a vice grip treatment.
I like my motorbike from 2006, which still has a carburetor engine and no catalytic convert, as one of the last years where this was common. The exhaust just goes straight out. Love it, especially since in Germany bikes are exempt from "green zones" in cities regarless of emissions. It only needs to emit less than 4,5 % CO on inspections, and the last measured values was 0,2 % so it actually runs quite clean.
My 1991 Ford F-150 351 cubic inch V8 engine began throwing a check engine light. Traced problem to ECU. Opened it & found the leaky caps. Like Shango shows in these videos repaired a dissolved circuit run & replaced electrolytics. Engine started right up & CEL cleared.
It took a while for the heavy duty vehicles to get overdrive transmissions w/ lock up torque converters. The big 3 had to build up beefier transmissions before the could be reliably installed for the loads an HD truck would handle. Even still, most owners manuals told you to push the button on the shifter, or drop it into drive when pulling a heavy trailer.
That's an easy clean ecu repair compared to most I see on those. Ive had some I repaired with burns all the way through. You got it good there no worries about internal layers on these, they are just 2 layer boards.
Interesting video. Shangp does teach quite a lot here. I don't see how people are drawing such weird conclusions from this. CO2 isn't a pollutant in small amounts, but in huge amounts it a problem. Same as sugar in your diet. You cant poison someone with sugar in small amounts, but in large quantity over time it is a problem. I think the calculation that air weighs 14.7 pounds is wrong. It has 14.7 psi at sea level. Pounds per square inch. We are worried about volume here. So like 302 cbic inches maybe? Or 4943 cc (5 liters) for ever two revolutions of the engine times volumetric efficiency, etc. The point as Shango makes it, every gallon of gas consumed will cause a predictable output in CO2. Less fuel consumption is better. Many ways to address this, but people have bad behavior and buying criteria. Electric cars aren't great, but probably incrementally better in most cases.
I am very used to modern AFR LSU4.9 o2 sensors to obtain a combustion information. Never seen a gas anayze station before in action. Thanks for demonstration.
the steering wheel cover matches the hood perfectly lol. at the end you say new radiator leads to further complications- exactly why i dont work on cars anymore. servive advisors and customers dont understand these things. and my old boss would be pissed if i suggested a ecm or bcm "repair."
I haven't heard it explained in this way exactly, thank you. I rest unsure of the effects of co2 but I'm not loosing any sleep at this time. And I won't vent any R12 or R22 except for that one time I did (freeze spray). Also, we are going to run out of oil.
My dad bought a new 87' F150 and he didn't want the AOD overdrive,,, he didn't trust it as he did some towing,, so he got the C6 3 speed with the 5.0. It was a hell of a good truck though. 9 years and a 160000 miles with terrible maintenance and it still ran good...
YOU are the carbon that they want to reduce. Whether it be through EOL’ing (unlikely but possible) or removing your agency to make choices (the most likely outcome). Don’t forget it.
I really like these automotive videos, they really demistify the smog aspect of cars which is rarely explained by people. Id be curious to know more about the feedback carburetors that were common in the 80s, seems like the only information i come across is from before or after that era. I've got a 1988 Mitsubishi pickup with the 2.6l engine and it has a spaghetti mess of vacuum lines and a single wire o2 sensor that is probably giving vague commands to the 2 barrel mikuni carb running the show😂
Pffft what do those scientists know? I mean surely the years of education and practical experiments aren't worth anything. Obviously right-wing talk-show hosts are more knowledgeable when it comes to matters of the air quality, energy policy, and the global climate.
Your exhalation CO2 was made as a result of your body's processing of the food you eat. Plants took the CO2 out of the air to produce the food, and you put it back when you breathe. That's why human-produced CO2 is not considered a (hazardous) addition to atmospheric CO2 levels, but more of an equation balance of the carbon cycle.
Fascinating. I thought plants used CO2 and produced 02? And one more question: will going " totally green" be environmentally friendly and possible? Thank you for such a good demonstration.
oil is 100% organic ,, when you burn it you get mostly CO2 plant food.... the wack jobs say its destroying the planet ...... you know " the earth has a fever " Oh wait , The 4 Seasons is now " Climate change " . the hole in the ozone was going to give us all skin cancer R-22 use to be $30 for 30 # 100 bottles was $3,000 now 100 bottles cost over $100,000 And not on one word today about it
Co2 is where life comes from. They're mind screwing us and it wouldn't matter what we do, they won't be happy until everyone has nothing, lives wherever the govt deems we must and accepts whatever crumbs the govt gives us to live on. People better wake up, this isn't about cleaning the air it's about control and power, that which politicians can never get enough of.
The leak is at the top. It will take a long time for all the coolant to go missing and stop cooling the truck. If the leak was at the bottom the radiator would be dry in a very short amount of time.
@@Mrshoujo you really don't understand my question... burning fosile fuel...does increase the polution? Or let me say it different... what result after incinerating plastic?
Just yesterday, a video popped up in my TH-cam feed about repair of the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) on C5 Corvettes. The model years on these were 1997-2004. Apparently notorious for going bad and dealers want $1700 to replace them. What causes them to go bad is 4 or 5 solder points on the pcb which, on inspection, are apparent. The thing is nasty to remove and get the cover off, but worth the effort. Unfortunately the videos only show the bottom of the board and not what is on top. I keep wondering if there are capacitors in there.
CO2 emission in the exhaust isn't totally the problem. It's the net change in the total CO2 footprint. As long as we burn fossil fuels we are releasing carbon that was sequestured eons ago back into the atmosphere. IF on the other hand we burn renewable fuels such as bio diesel, ethanol, or other plant derived fuels we are releasing carbon that was recently removed from the atmosphere by the plants from which the fuel was made. In other words, the closed loop process would be carbon neutral. That is it WOULD be, if the process of growing the plants for fuel, and refining them into fuel was done WITHOUT the use of fossil fuel to produce the required energy. This means switching to solar, wind, hydro, geo-thermal, or other some other carbon neutral energy source for the production of bio fuels. The same applies to electric cars, we need to make the batteries (from mining the raw materials, processing the chemicals, and running the factories) using only carbon neutral energy. Otherwise we are only fixing the 'last mile' of the energy chain by switching from ICE cars to electric. (And I didn't mention where the power to charge the batteries comes from). In the end, ditching ICE power might end up making only a small difference in the carbon footprint. However more efficient cars (hybrids) that can use less fossil fuels to go further, will improve the issue. The Toyota Corolla hybrid I now have uses as much gas as three of the first car I ever had back in 1977. Oh and your comparing yourself as a source of CO2 by breathing into the probe was funny (you should have tried farting into it). But people burn bio fuels, so we are carbon neutral. Not a problem.
Re-squeeze the tabs on the tank leaks, or replace rad. When I was doing emission/drivability/e-check as mechanic/technician, had always appreciated the "high" co2 value as an indicator of perfect emission control. What the zeitgeist fails to mention is that vegetation thrives on co 2, which is using sheep ignorance to instill fear for living as a car bon-based entity. But more greenery is getting paved over every year rather than being replanted. Just sayin....
I was in a Ford dealership the other day. I overheard the service manager on the phone with with someone that had their cat convertors stolen off of one of these "Big" F250's. He was quoting them a replacement cost of $6000 (Cdn) to replace. As I was leaving I asked him if I had heard him correctly. He said Yes, and that's for a "cheap one" most of the "Big Commercial trucks" run $8000-$9000 (Cdn) dollars. CAT theft is rampant up here.
If your combustion temperature is too high, the nitrogen oxide goes up. It's a problem for hemi engines because they can run correctly with extreme combustion temps without any sign. In most other engines, the engine will run poorly because of knock at high enough combustion temps for NOX to be a problem.
@@rogersmith7396 Those utilize direct injection, like a diesel. Normally if the compression was that high the gasoline would start burning before the engine is ready. With direct injection they can compress the air and inject the gasoline into the high pressure air controlling when it starts burning.
Yeah it’s just a 3 speed, probably a C6 automatic. The gear indicator would have an “O” around the D for overdrive… the AOD may have been an option for that truck (I know it was on the 150 half tons), but that one didn’t get it.
Interesting video, but I can't stay focused on it due to my nagging curiosity about how you have access to an emission testing station. How does that work?
What is there more to explain?! Man made climate change has been discussed over and over and over again in the last 20 years. It's a fact backed by so many studies and everyone that doesn't agree has either a monitary reason or a other motive to sell you on some snake oil. The issue is just that the global community didn't do shit since the late 90s to improve things, and now that the consequences pile up the rate of change will have to be way steeper. And again, this isn't a stupid red vs blue party thing or a media x uses y to get attention, that's just a sad fact.
You communicated very clearly! What you said about CO 2 emissions is 100% correct.You also correctly stated that several of the initiatives being undertaken to reduce CO 2 emissions. One you did not mention which is not related directly to vehicle emissions are reduction of animals meant for human consumption that produce carbon dioxide and also gas such as methane. This can apply to cow's sheep, et. Cetera. The United Nations is proposing that insects be used as a human food replacement for meats because of this. Right wing conspiracy theorists are making too much out of this, because they think the intent is to eliminate meat production. In some ways the answer to that question is yes, but in some ways it is not, because some European countries have adopted methods that the UN considers to be OK, at least for now, in terms of how meat is produced. We can argue all day about whether that's a valid solution or not but that's what's going on. Also CO2 production by humans breathing is starting to be thought of as another statictic to prove the earth is overpopulated.
Most seem to argue its not a pollutant, well some believe it is and they make decisions that affect us. If you understand that you can make better long term decisions/investments. I know about what the UN and WE F are doing and Im not eating bugs period, human digestive systems don't break them down. Ill do soy and vegan before I do bugs, I dont really eat much meat anyway... Its all part of ES G score and im sure you know
Meat is for protein and protein can be derived from other sources like beans. McDonalds will have a hard sell with bug burgers. If you've seen "Bridge on the River Kwai" thats what the POWs ate while starving.
Exactly - and the plants took up the same amount when they grew - so it’s a balance. But burning fossil fuels put CO2 in the athmosphere without taking any out again.
These trucks have two temperature sensors. One for inside the truck and one for the ECU. The ECU sensor is near the ignition module and distributor. The one for the gauge is in the drivers head above the exhaust manifold. This is why there was no check engine light even when the gauge was not working.
Take away the EGR on your Benz and the result will be High Nox. The EGR is designed to reduce the heat of the burning fuel. Take away oxygen ( EGR on ) and fuel burns slower with less heat. So when your EGR is working the temperature of the burn is lower. This reduces the chance for Nitrogen ( which is about 80% of the air going into the engine) from combining under high heat with Oxygen. That's the Nox value on the right of his analyzer screen. Volkswagon got in trouble for running their diesels with high combustion temperatures which made great fuel mileage and very low emissions everywhere except for Nox which was high. Nox makes smog when sunlight breaks it apart.
A higher CO2 concentration just makes plants grow better. Plant life is keeping the atmosphere's CO2 levels in check. Since huge areas of the world are now deforested, it's harder for that little left-over plant life here and there to keep up, so we're measuring higher levels. A forest retains soil and moist. It also regulates temperature and breaks the wind. A forest is the best tool to keep the climate in check. It uses CO2 from the atmosphere and water, works on solar energy and it outputs oxygen and construction materials.
Oil pressure works. The temp sensor is what didn't work. And it's not needed for the guage to work because this truck has two coolant temp sensors. One for the ECU and one for the gauge.
Not sure what your talking about here carbon dioxide has long been known to be a greenhouse gas with all the rest. Studied this in 1995 when I got my BA.
Why do those caps in the ECU's you've shown leak such acidic liquid when so many other caps don't? (I've seen them many times in other equipment) Are they using high acidity electrolyte yet aren't surface mount caps? High fish also... interesting. Now seriously I ran into menthol-like fish caps a little while back, 6800 uf 35v mid 80's nichicon, Otari MX 5050. Couldn't get the smell out of my sinuses for 2 days, worst caps I've experienced yet but they were NOT corroding the board.
excellent. And like Joe's pinball: we all don't care about what y'all look like. it's more about if you can fix a Ukrainian medium bandwidth receiver, and such. CTC151
I like eletric cars but my issue is that the electric grid can not handle every one having evs. Also there needs to be standerds for parts like batteries sense those are gurintied to fail
The faster you drive the cleaner the engine burns fuel. That's why you get better mileage on the highway vs city. Testing at 25mph is worse case scenario test.
Could it be that plants through photosynthesis cannot keep up with the additional CO2 combustion is adding? The Earth likely doesn't care about the global warming effect of CO2... temperatures etc. rise and the effects on water levels/weather affect humans because our lives are so much more fragile.
2:25 seems like a good running engine to me. And whose old enough to remember the climate hysteria from 30yrs ago? There predictions never arrived did they.
Back in the 70’s it was an ice age these climate freaks were predicting., due to coal smoke. Well that didn’t happen, so they switched to global warming supposedly due to CO2 emissions. Only thing in common is the desire to cripple our energy production and send the masses back to caveman existence, while the global elites live better than ever. Wake up people and NEVER VOTE DEMOCRAT!
The engine and gauge use separate temperature sensors for water temperature on these ford trucks. Guage sensor is above the exhaust manifold on the driver side and the ECU uses one near the distributor. If the ECU sees the engine overheating it will turn on check engine light, if it reaches 255F it will depower the truck into a limp mode and you'll be lucky to drive 35mph.
I'm not sure why all the negativity towards electric cars. Yeah, they are too expensive for me to consider at this point. To break even vs an ICE I would need to double my amount of driving or keep an EV like 8-10 years. But it's enticing that I could put some panels on my roof to make my own fuel (at least some of it) vs buying it from an extortioner cartel.
Something to think about, you mentioned methane and trying to eliminate it. There's been developments made to run vehicles off of methane. A Canadian farmer has been running his vehicles off of it for quite some time now, but it's locking government approval, so it's technically illegal but completely doable. It's definitely a usable fuel that would help the environment in the long run. Since we all know electric cars are more harmful to the environment than gasoline or diesel.
Methane is another name for natural gas. Lot's of vehicles run on natural gas. Still contributes to CO2, but escaped methane is probably an even more terrible greenhouse gas.
The total amount of CO2 in our atmosphere is 0.04%! If we do nothing the climate controllers want us to do ,100 years from now it will be 0.05 %. Seems pretty insignificant to me. Just keeping growing green plants and trees and we will be OK. The e caps are goners and surprised the truck ever started. Once replaced the truck seems to work good once again. But it has others issues as Shango shows . Radiator, hoses, oil pressure and temperature sending units. On the testing of emissions; it passes CA state tests. All good for a 32 year old vehicle. Appreciate a video like this Shango but change the radiator out ASAP or it will really be a F.O.R.D. Found On Road Dead.
I don't think auto emissions are the main drivers of warming, ie infra red absorption but a contributor. Electrical generation is the biggest driver. They changed freon to ozone safe, now it is to be changed again to climate safe. There are other contributors to warming.
Most modern cars more or less have lower HC and CO than the ambient air. That was a big help for reducing things like smog. Many areas in California would have atrocious smog year round. As you said, CO2 is just a proxy for fuel economy. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are going up, and most scientists believe it's from burning fossil fuels - hence the push to reduce CO2 production.
But yet if you look at chart's that have Not been cherry picked, the temps are not inline with the small increase. C02 is a natural product. Plants need it to live. Last I heard of some real numbers,Co2 isn't but 0.04 percent Total. Plants start to die at 0.02 percent. We are being lied to.
Science is meant to be questioned. Not taken as gospel.
@@KenKen-ui4ny Very much agree. One reason I have researched. I almost fell for this when I was a young man. I trust science has much as I trust the Government. < 0 = less than zero.
There's science, and then there's Science(tm), brought to you by the politico-academic complex.
Anybody that accepts anything that politicians,their “experts”,or the media says at face value is an idiot and deserves whatever they get. (The problem is the rest of us in society get dragged along and our lives are affected by it). These are the so called “useful idiots”,those incapable or too lazy to excercise critical thinking skills,looking for someone to follow and a cause to champion to give their lives meaning that give these morons their power.
Fear is an an extremely powerful weapon in propaganda. Whip people into a frenzy with fear over something and tell them you have the answers and you own them and can sell them anything. they will willingly let you control them and take away their rights if they believe it it’s for their own good. People willingly lined up to have themselves injected with an experimental chemical cocktail that was rushed into production,not knowing or caring what the possible long term side effects and health ramifications would be. Our “leaders” and their “experts” know beat and said it’s for the greater good,right? Our leaders are all altruists without hidden agendas who have our only best interests at heart.
“You know what the public's like? A cage of Guinea Pigs. Good Night you stupid idiots. Good Night, you miserable slobs. They're a lot of trained seals. I toss them a dead fish and they'll flap their flippers.”
As a retired auto tech, I must say that you have an excellent grasp of the subject matter and explained things well.
I love the science of engine management. I was so impressed with the ECM on my 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme with the E2ME carburetor. I knew exactly when that thing went into closed loop. It never failed the emissions test!
I have to say, Shango. You've helped me quite a few times just by tossing these things out to us. I appreciate it.
Rely great explanation of all. I'm retired ASE Cert. Master Auto Tech, L1 so I appreciate it. I found you by accident due to TV repair. Thank you, by the way.
Knowing how to troubleshoot electronics is such a valuable skill so playing around with old TVs ain't necessary a waste of time.
I managed to save multiple radiators leaking between the matrix and the end cap by tightening the tabs with a vice grip. In fact, I removed the brand new, pretty expensive, but crappy Nissens (considered as quality manufacturer) one from my Audi 80 and put back the 35yrs old original, after a vice grip treatment.
Appreciate the breakdown and explanation of exhaust gases. Good video!
When I went through the indication camp i was taught co2 was a good thing that made the trees happy
Excellent as usual. I can see why a poor running engine really does pollute. Would be interesting to see how an older LEXUS would fair
I like my motorbike from 2006, which still has a carburetor engine and no catalytic convert, as one of the last years where this was common. The exhaust just goes straight out. Love it, especially since in Germany bikes are exempt from "green zones" in cities regarless of emissions. It only needs to emit less than 4,5 % CO on inspections, and the last measured values was 0,2 % so it actually runs quite clean.
I used to be a pretty good mechanic. I got tired of California's crap and moved. Nice video bud.
My 1991 Ford F-150 351 cubic inch V8 engine began throwing a check engine light. Traced problem to ECU. Opened it & found the leaky caps. Like Shango shows in these videos repaired a dissolved circuit run & replaced electrolytics. Engine started right up & CEL cleared.
It took a while for the heavy duty vehicles to get overdrive transmissions w/ lock up torque converters. The big 3 had to build up beefier transmissions before the could be reliably installed for the loads an HD truck would handle.
Even still, most owners manuals told you to push the button on the shifter, or drop it into drive when pulling a heavy trailer.
That's an easy clean ecu repair compared to most I see on those. Ive had some I repaired with burns all the way through.
You got it good there no worries about internal layers on these, they are just 2 layer boards.
Interesting video. Shangp does teach quite a lot here. I don't see how people are drawing such weird conclusions from this. CO2 isn't a pollutant in small amounts, but in huge amounts it a problem. Same as sugar in your diet. You cant poison someone with sugar in small amounts, but in large quantity over time it is a problem.
I think the calculation that air weighs 14.7 pounds is wrong. It has 14.7 psi at sea level. Pounds per square inch. We are worried about volume here. So like 302 cbic inches maybe? Or 4943 cc (5 liters) for ever two revolutions of the engine times volumetric efficiency, etc.
The point as Shango makes it, every gallon of gas consumed will cause a predictable output in CO2. Less fuel consumption is better. Many ways to address this, but people have bad behavior and buying criteria. Electric cars aren't great, but probably incrementally better in most cases.
I am very used to modern AFR LSU4.9 o2 sensors to obtain a combustion information. Never seen a gas anayze station before in action. Thanks for demonstration.
the steering wheel cover matches the hood perfectly lol. at the end you say new radiator leads to further complications- exactly why i dont work on cars anymore. servive advisors and customers dont understand these things. and my old boss would be pissed if i suggested a ecm or bcm "repair."
I daily drive a 1986 Cavalier. It's my main car, and I don't own a modern car. I'd say mine is more akin to DOS 4.0 versus Windows 3.1
Haha I thought we all went from DOS 3.3 straight to 5.0? 4 being too buggy :)
Where did you even find a 1986 Cavalier to buy these days? The last one I saw was on its way to the crusher.
Where do you put my 1970 Eldorado? Transistors were coming on strong in 1970. DOD started to replace their tube equipment then.
Oddly it has a return fuel line from the carb.
I haven't heard it explained in this way exactly, thank you. I rest unsure of the effects of co2 but I'm not loosing any sleep at this time. And I won't vent any R12 or R22 except for that one time I did (freeze spray). Also, we are going to run out of oil.
Vast areas of the planet have'nt been tapped for oil. They claim there may be war over oil in the arctic.
I really enjoy the ECM videos Shango!
Yep my O2 sensors are 4 wire Bosch ones I installed 3 years ago
My dad bought a new 87' F150 and he didn't want the AOD overdrive,,, he didn't trust it as he did some towing,, so he got the C6 3 speed with the 5.0.
It was a hell of a good truck though.
9 years and a 160000 miles with terrible maintenance and it still ran good...
My AOD started failing at 160,000 miles. At least it leaked like a seive.
YOU are the carbon that they want to reduce. Whether it be through EOL’ing (unlikely but possible) or removing your agency to make choices (the most likely outcome). Don’t forget it.
maybe the next round they will succeed
@@shango066 Over my ded body they might.
@@timcat1004 You mean they will
@@1marcelfilms lmao
I really like these automotive videos, they really demistify the smog aspect of cars which is rarely explained by people. Id be curious to know more about the feedback carburetors that were common in the 80s, seems like the only information i come across is from before or after that era. I've got a 1988 Mitsubishi pickup with the 2.6l engine and it has a spaghetti mess of vacuum lines and a single wire o2 sensor that is probably giving vague commands to the 2 barrel mikuni carb running the show😂
I fill up with e10 before every inspection. Dont think it needs it but the emissions are always super good when tested
E10, as opposed to what? That's practically all that's available here in KS...
Good to see someone else has figured out "their" goal for CO2 control.......
Pffft what do those scientists know? I mean surely the years of education and practical experiments aren't worth anything. Obviously right-wing talk-show hosts are more knowledgeable when it comes to matters of the air quality, energy policy, and the global climate.
I love this channel
These videos are awesome!
95 was the start of OBDII for Ford. But was mandatory in 96.
You reminded me that i've got to pull the ecu out of my 93 ranger plow truck and recap it...
Thank you , for explaining, perfectly
My plan is to fly for Samsung support center cinema Philippines gracias
really good and interesting video enjoyed that one.
exhaling more HC then a modern car LMAO
It would never cross my mind to analyze a human with that
Your exhalation CO2 was made as a result of your body's processing of the food you eat. Plants took the CO2 out of the air to produce the food, and you put it back when you breathe. That's why human-produced CO2 is not considered a (hazardous) addition to atmospheric CO2 levels, but more of an equation balance of the carbon cycle.
the CO@ threat goes up the more rainforest and old growth forest that vaniush and this is also why all these crazy wild fire are also bad
Volcanos.
Shame you are so far away, would love to do some work with you. I do know quite a lot but i could learn even more from you.
Fascinating. I thought plants used CO2 and produced 02?
And one more question: will going " totally green" be environmentally friendly and possible? Thank you for such a good demonstration.
oil is 100% organic ,, when you burn it you get mostly CO2 plant food....
the wack jobs say its destroying the planet ......
you know " the earth has a fever " Oh wait , The 4 Seasons is now " Climate change " .
the hole in the ozone was going to give us all skin cancer
R-22 use to be $30 for 30 # 100 bottles was $3,000
now 100 bottles cost over $100,000
And not on one word today about it
They do. Plants use CO2 and produce O2 during photosynthesis. Its the other way round at night. And no. Its impossible to go "net zero" imo.
Co2 is where life comes from. They're mind screwing us and it wouldn't matter what we do, they won't be happy until everyone has nothing, lives wherever the govt deems we must and accepts whatever crumbs the govt gives us to live on. People better wake up, this isn't about cleaning the air it's about control and power, that which politicians can never get enough of.
96% of a plant's mass is from CO2 it takes in through the leaves for photosynthesis.
Greenhouses inject CO2 to make plants grow 2-3X larger as they consume the CO2.
The notorious ford truck leaky windshield and or cab lights, always seems to leak down onto the ECU.
"Hope that doesn't get my video banned today🙄" Shango2023 awesome video buddy 😁👍
Great video! I wish the idiots making the laws and rules would watch it so they could understand just how out of touch with reality they are.
90s Dodge Neon's came with a 3 Speed, no OD.
In the UK we have E10 and E5.
BAKED.
It took some balls to drive that thing on the road in knowing that it has a leaking radiator!! It could go FUBAR at any moment!!!
The leak is at the top. It will take a long time for all the coolant to go missing and stop cooling the truck. If the leak was at the bottom the radiator would be dry in a very short amount of time.
In UK they built plastic burning plants... to produce free tax electricity.... does burning plastic every day it's not increase the polution? 🤔
If it's incinerated and no smoke released which is the purpose of an incinerator.
@@Mrshoujo you really don't understand my question... burning fosile fuel...does increase the polution? Or let me say it different... what result after incinerating plastic?
Just yesterday, a video popped up in my TH-cam feed about repair of the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) on C5 Corvettes. The model years on these were 1997-2004. Apparently notorious for going bad and dealers want $1700 to replace them. What causes them to go bad is 4 or 5 solder points on the pcb which, on inspection, are apparent. The thing is nasty to remove and get the cover off, but worth the effort. Unfortunately the videos only show the bottom of the board and not what is on top. I keep wondering if there are capacitors in there.
Damn 30ppm HC out of Shango I wonder what the average beer drinking Aussie would Blow.
Those dirty little sneaky capacitors
CO2 emission in the exhaust isn't totally the problem. It's the net change in the total CO2 footprint. As long as we burn fossil fuels we are releasing carbon that was sequestured eons ago back into the atmosphere. IF on the other hand we burn renewable fuels such as bio diesel, ethanol, or other plant derived fuels we are releasing carbon that was recently removed from the atmosphere by the plants from which the fuel was made. In other words, the closed loop process would be carbon neutral. That is it WOULD be, if the process of growing the plants for fuel, and refining them into fuel was done WITHOUT the use of fossil fuel to produce the required energy. This means switching to solar, wind, hydro, geo-thermal, or other some other carbon neutral energy source for the production of bio fuels. The same applies to electric cars, we need to make the batteries (from mining the raw materials, processing the chemicals, and running the factories) using only carbon neutral energy. Otherwise we are only fixing the 'last mile' of the energy chain by switching from ICE cars to electric. (And I didn't mention where the power to charge the batteries comes from). In the end, ditching ICE power might end up making only a small difference in the carbon footprint. However more efficient cars (hybrids) that can use less fossil fuels to go further, will improve the issue. The Toyota Corolla hybrid I now have uses as much gas as three of the first car I ever had back in 1977.
Oh and your comparing yourself as a source of CO2 by breathing into the probe was funny (you should have tried farting into it). But people burn bio fuels, so we are carbon neutral. Not a problem.
Great video
Re-squeeze the tabs on the tank leaks, or replace rad.
When I was doing emission/drivability/e-check as mechanic/technician, had always appreciated the "high" co2 value as an indicator of perfect emission control.
What the zeitgeist fails to mention is that vegetation thrives on co 2, which is using sheep ignorance to instill fear for living as a car bon-based entity. But more greenery is getting paved over every year rather than being replanted. Just sayin....
I was in a Ford dealership the other day. I overheard the service manager on the phone with with someone that had their cat convertors stolen off of one of these "Big" F250's. He was quoting them a replacement cost of $6000 (Cdn) to replace. As I was leaving I asked him if I had heard him correctly. He said Yes, and that's for a "cheap one" most of the "Big Commercial trucks" run $8000-$9000 (Cdn) dollars. CAT theft is rampant up here.
its everywhere, thats what insurance is for
@@shango066 That Ford truck CAT'S you're working on are worth more than that truck.
I've seen after market cats for cars for $60.00.
Good morning!!
If your combustion temperature is too high, the nitrogen oxide goes up. It's a problem for hemi engines because they can run correctly with extreme combustion temps without any sign. In most other engines, the engine will run poorly because of knock at high enough combustion temps for NOX to be a problem.
Some new Japanese engines are running at 14:1 compression. I don't see how this is done.
@@rogersmith7396 Those utilize direct injection, like a diesel. Normally if the compression was that high the gasoline would start burning before the engine is ready. With direct injection they can compress the air and inject the gasoline into the high pressure air controlling when it starts burning.
@@btwbrand OK.
Yeah it’s just a 3 speed, probably a C6 automatic. The gear indicator would have an “O” around the D for overdrive… the AOD may have been an option for that truck (I know it was on the 150 half tons), but that one didn’t get it.
Lockup converter clutch could not cope with high loads back then
Interesting video, but I can't stay focused on it due to my nagging curiosity about how you have access to an emission testing station. How does that work?
Mashallah
If you’re a bit technically inclined it is frustrating how people have no idea, but strong opinions on these things
Or maybe if the people making the decisions took the time to explain the rationale and physics
@@shango066 That will be the day. They used to do it here but now they prefer to treat the population like children by just appealing to emotions
What is there more to explain?! Man made climate change has been discussed over and over and over again in the last 20 years. It's a fact backed by so many studies and everyone that doesn't agree has either a monitary reason or a other motive to sell you on some snake oil.
The issue is just that the global community didn't do shit since the late 90s to improve things, and now that the consequences pile up the rate of change will have to be way steeper.
And again, this isn't a stupid red vs blue party thing or a media x uses y to get attention, that's just a sad fact.
Good fix. Have you ever looked at, or tried to look at, the code on one of those ECU's? It is like a plate of spaghetti. So much for "Right to repair"
Macrame steering wheel cover, custom knitted seat covers too?......
You communicated very clearly! What you said about CO 2 emissions is 100% correct.You also correctly stated that several of the initiatives being undertaken to reduce CO 2 emissions. One you did not mention which is not related directly to vehicle emissions are reduction of animals meant for human consumption that produce carbon dioxide and also gas such as methane. This can apply to cow's sheep, et. Cetera. The United Nations is proposing that insects be used as a human food replacement for meats because of this. Right wing conspiracy theorists are making too much out of this, because they think the intent is to eliminate meat production. In some ways the answer to that question is yes, but in some ways it is not, because some European countries have adopted methods that the UN considers to be OK, at least for now, in terms of how meat is produced. We can argue all day about whether that's a valid solution or not but that's what's going on. Also CO2 production by humans breathing is starting to be thought of as another statictic to prove the earth is overpopulated.
Most seem to argue its not a pollutant, well some believe it is and they make decisions that affect us. If you understand that you can make better long term decisions/investments. I know about what the UN and WE F are doing and Im not eating bugs period, human digestive systems don't break them down. Ill do soy and vegan before I do bugs, I dont really eat much meat anyway... Its all part of ES G score and im sure you know
Meat is for protein and protein can be derived from other sources like beans. McDonalds will have a hard sell with bug burgers. If you've seen "Bridge on the River Kwai" thats what the POWs ate while starving.
@@shango066 Well said!
How much lithium hydroxide would be needed to scrub all the CO2 from the exhaust emissions?
91 Ford f350 7.5 here. Im having major rough idle and misfire.
isnt Co2 what we breathe out?
Exactly - and the plants took up the same amount when they grew - so it’s a balance. But burning fossil fuels put CO2 in the athmosphere without taking any out again.
@@srenhansen1983 sure bud
True, but a human produces about 3kg of co2 per day, a vehicle does this in about 15 minutes.
@@sciencetestsubject uh you are the co2 they want to reduce.
Leaky rad and no temp gauge, what can possibly go wrong?
These trucks have two temperature sensors. One for inside the truck and one for the ECU.
The ECU sensor is near the ignition module and distributor. The one for the gauge is in the drivers head above the exhaust manifold.
This is why there was no check engine light even when the gauge was not working.
I'd love to know what the tailpipe difference between EGR connected and not on my 91 Benz diesel.
Take away the EGR on your Benz and the result will be High Nox.
The EGR is designed to reduce the heat of the burning fuel. Take away oxygen ( EGR on ) and fuel burns slower with less heat.
So when your EGR is working the temperature of the burn is lower. This reduces the chance for Nitrogen ( which is about 80% of the air going into the engine) from combining under high heat with Oxygen. That's the Nox value on the right of his analyzer screen.
Volkswagon got in trouble for running their diesels with high combustion temperatures which made great fuel mileage and very low emissions everywhere except for Nox which was high.
Nox makes smog when sunlight breaks it apart.
rolling emission test, LA, SF valley area???
How come those had so much play in the steering
Good one Master shango066
Where did you have access to a dyno?
California emissions tests are done on a dyno at state inspection stations for older vehicles without OBD2 capability.
A higher CO2 concentration just makes plants grow better. Plant life is keeping the atmosphere's CO2 levels in check. Since huge areas of the world are now deforested, it's harder for that little left-over plant life here and there to keep up, so we're measuring higher levels.
A forest retains soil and moist. It also regulates temperature and breaks the wind. A forest is the best tool to keep the climate in check. It uses CO2 from the atmosphere and water, works on solar energy and it outputs oxygen and construction materials.
Oil pressure sender should be easy to replace. Are electric fans working?
Oil pressure works. The temp sensor is what didn't work.
And it's not needed for the guage to work because this truck has two coolant temp sensors. One for the ECU and one for the gauge.
Shouts out to the knitted steering wheel cover!
Shane how much would you charge to fix a PCM for a dodge truck
And you can make a video doing it get back to me with a pm
How often do they have to change those exhaust sensors in the analyzers anyway?
Not sure what your talking about here carbon dioxide has long been known to be a greenhouse gas with all the rest. Studied this in 1995 when I got my BA.
See Charles Keeling and the Keeling curve.
Why do those caps in the ECU's you've shown leak such acidic liquid when so many other caps don't? (I've seen them many times in other equipment) Are they using high acidity electrolyte yet aren't surface mount caps? High fish also... interesting. Now seriously I ran into menthol-like fish caps a little while back, 6800 uf 35v mid 80's nichicon, Otari MX 5050. Couldn't get the smell out of my sinuses for 2 days, worst caps I've experienced yet but they were NOT corroding the board.
There was a bad run of caps in the late 80's into the 90's. Something to do with stolen chemical recipes and not produced correctly.
excellent. And like Joe's pinball: we all don't care about what y'all look like. it's more about if you can fix a Ukrainian medium bandwidth receiver, and such. CTC151
Hurts to see Nichicons fail like that, especially 105C rated. I wonder if they were part of the fakes that were on the market back then.
That's Failure from age. The rash of bad capacitors from poor electrolyte was in the early 2000s
I like eletric cars but my issue is that the electric grid can not handle every one having evs. Also there needs to be standerds for parts like batteries sense those are gurintied to fail
Likely has a C6 transmission.
Where can I get one of those steering wheel covers?
Have your grandmother make you one.
I hope when 90% of cars are electric they will stop complaining about 10% normal cars left on the road
HAHAH I CAN DREAM
Plant food is the 'Boogeyman' 🤭
Just wondering if this test was made at 25 miles per hour... Driving with 80 miles per hour... will make any difference? 🤔
The faster you drive the cleaner the engine burns fuel. That's why you get better mileage on the highway vs city. Testing at 25mph is worse case scenario test.
I need to get a spare ECU for my car and recap it before this happens
Only the O2 sensor to go closed.
Could it be that plants through photosynthesis cannot keep up with the additional CO2 combustion is adding? The Earth likely doesn't care about the global warming effect of CO2... temperatures etc. rise and the effects on water levels/weather affect humans because our lives are so much more fragile.
If it doesn't get erased see my post about that recent senate hearing.
Its why people are alarmed by cutting down the Amazon rain forest for ranching. Its a large segment of the earths green belt.
Why would'nt E 85 reduce pollution? E 100?
2:25 seems like a good running engine to me. And whose old enough to remember the climate hysteria from 30yrs ago? There predictions never arrived did they.
Back in the 70’s it was an ice age these climate freaks were predicting., due to coal smoke. Well that didn’t happen, so they switched to global warming supposedly due to CO2 emissions. Only thing in common is the desire to cripple our energy production and send the masses back to caveman existence, while the global elites live better than ever. Wake up people and NEVER VOTE DEMOCRAT!
All of the climate predictions have always been ~100+ years out. No one ever said the oceans would raise 10 feet in 10 years.
My ecology class in the 1970s said warming was real but the world only had 40 years worth of oil left so it would'nt happen.
3-speed C6 automatic.
" Here we have leaky caps " 🥴
Doesn't that "3 speed" actually have a lock out torque converter which acts like a 4 speed?
It does not.
No temp gauge? No alert warnings for heat build up.
The engine and gauge use separate temperature sensors for water temperature on these ford trucks. Guage sensor is above the exhaust manifold on the driver side and the ECU uses one near the distributor. If the ECU sees the engine overheating it will turn on check engine light, if it reaches 255F it will depower the truck into a limp mode and you'll be lucky to drive 35mph.
Wow. Very informative.
I'm not sure why all the negativity towards electric cars. Yeah, they are too expensive for me to consider at this point. To break even vs an ICE I would need to double my amount of driving or keep an EV like 8-10 years. But it's enticing that I could put some panels on my roof to make my own fuel (at least some of it) vs buying it from an extortioner cartel.
Something to think about, you mentioned methane and trying to eliminate it.
There's been developments made to run vehicles off of methane.
A Canadian farmer has been running his vehicles off of it for quite some time now, but it's locking government approval, so it's technically illegal but completely doable.
It's definitely a usable fuel that would help the environment in the long run.
Since we all know electric cars are more harmful to the environment than gasoline or diesel.
Methane is another name for natural gas. Lot's of vehicles run on natural gas. Still contributes to CO2, but escaped methane is probably an even more terrible greenhouse gas.
I got a laugh that humans and animals produce just as much CO2 than cars.
The total amount of CO2 in our atmosphere is 0.04%! If we do nothing the climate controllers want us to do ,100 years
from now it will be 0.05 %. Seems pretty insignificant to me. Just keeping growing green plants and trees and we will be
OK. The e caps are goners and surprised the truck ever started. Once replaced the truck seems to work good once again.
But it has others issues as Shango shows . Radiator, hoses, oil pressure and temperature sending units. On the testing of emissions; it passes CA state tests. All good for a 32 year old vehicle. Appreciate a video like this Shango but change the radiator out ASAP or it will really be a F.O.R.D. Found On Road Dead.
dont forget cow farts
I don't think auto emissions are the main drivers of warming, ie infra red absorption but a contributor. Electrical generation is the biggest driver. They changed freon to ozone safe, now it is to be changed again to climate safe. There are other contributors to warming.
@@TD75 Briliiant. I would just assume it stay at an agreeable temperature while I am on it.
Industry is the biggest polluter. Corporations put out more emissions than consumers as they create the goods we consume.