Sublime!! Also 25+ years into Omega and very true that I am often surprised on models I didn’t even know existed. Love your video and how you talk about the Omegas with pure passion and realism which nowadays in the “commercial” watch world is rare as it’s mostly, hey look at me look what I got when people own some exquisite pieces. You do it true to the time when we were just a subculture back in the 90’s and 00’s. Thanks again for sharing these wonderful pieces ❤ All the best from Amsterdam
Thank you so much for the comment. I'm glad you feel the same way! It’s a never-ending journey. Not to mention that not every Omega design can be searched on Google either. Passion and dedication will make collecting fun!
Beautiful watches! I see many watches of this era,but always with age related marks.So very educational to see them as a new buyer would back in the day. They are a good example as to why Omega is a great watch manufacturer,especially from this timeframe.
Your videos actually helped me decide to pull the trigger on an old seamaster I’ve been thinking about. Would love to see you review the Aeschbach Pilots watch from MWC if you ever get the chance!
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Any time my friend , I'm glad your still uploading I like checking out these lovely watches from time to time.. As I've caught your reply on my lunch break (I'm in the UK) can I ask a question please? I have a lovely 9ct gold Omega Geneve watch from around the 1970s.. It has an unusual case shape which is the reason I kept it when I sold my modest collection of Omega Geneve and Seamasters.. Do you think you could help me identify the reference number if I made a small upload of it? Many thanks
Hi, I mainly focus on pieces from the 1920s to 1960s. So I can't promise that I can help you, but please feel free to send me an image of your watch to my email at: info@omeagenthusiast.com
Its crazy how crisp a watch looks brand new. Imo only the last watch should not be called new old stock since it was actually worn by someone as the product out in the world. Its no longer new in that case so you could say pristine or like new etc. But new old stock is right off the shelf or display, it should be like buying it today just with many years on its bones. I would be upset buying something labeled new old stock to find out otherwise. As for product photos, id still say thats is "new" along with like a person trying it on in the store because lots of products are used in photos. BUT especially when it comes to the band, if it shows any sign of wear even the slightest crease it should also be labeled display model. New is new that goes for the band being completely untouched as well.
Thank you for the comment and your input. Unfortunately, not every watch store that offers a variety of brands can afford to invest in hundreds of watches just to let their customers try them on. Not to mention that the sales rep occasionally passes by their store to offer the latest products. So many of the watches, such as Movado, Tissot, Rado, Mont Blanc, Longines, and Seiko, to name a few, that people wear are more than likely from display pieces. Over two decades ago, I worked at a retail store selling brand-name watches. The store did not carry a double of any watch. When a display piece gets sold, a new one is ordered to replace it.
Wonderful, again. It is very nice to see a video of these timepieces - it gives us a different perspective of what the watch looks like in person, compared to photo images (although your photos are all high quality). I agree with your definition of NOS. Thanks for the video, very interesting. Love the Seamaster.
There are several. Four that come to mind are 2676, 2766, 2759 and 2848. They are uncommon, but to find them in excellent and unpolished condition is a challenge.
These are stunning. Do you happen to know, adjusted for inflation, what these watches would have retailed for? Interesting to know how “affordable” they were back in the day, vs current prices. My impression is that modern, quality watches are significantly less affordable than such watches were in decades past! I get that technology and materials have moved on. But modern prices continue to race north.
Thank you for the comment. I do not have their price list. But even if you compare it with today’s pricing, a modern Omega is still many times more expensive. For example, the beefy lug in this video will cost around $1000 today, but check out the price of a modern Seamaster. That’s why not everyone can afford to wear an Omega nowadays
What is your opinion, on exotic leather ? On a recent Kirby Alison video on bespoke shoes, they spoke about *Reindeer* leather and *Whale/Seal/Walrus* leather, the former was found at 100m depth, still preserved in the mud of a sunken ship from Russia, in the 17th Century. The Metta Catharina leathers, found in Plymouth. I'm not a fan of Ostrich. Are you ? I ask, because I love your straps ! A goid individual and unique steap, can totally transform a watch. I think you'll agree ?
Seeing how our world has become so sensitive, I think it's best to stick to calf, gator, lizard, pig, and ostrich skin. I have tried on some vintage shark and, I believe, elephant skin straps in the past; they are really nice, too.
My vintage Omega Seamaster De Ville 14K solid gold has a number 1293722 on the inside of the case back. I consider you to be an authority on vintage Omega watches and would appreciate your comment on what this number refers to. Many thanks. Great videos, always look forward to them.
@@TimelessHistoryChannelThere is also the triangle Omega logo and the word ROSS and the number KL6610, which I have checked and it confirms the 14K solid gold case. The movement number on the movement also confirms that the watch dates to 1963. Many thanks for your assistance and prompt response.
KL6610 is the model reference number. This reference was made for the Norman Morris US collection. I made a whole video about it. The 7 digits number is the Ross casing serial numbers.
You should see how many NOS Omegas I’ve sold in the past. But I also need to enjoy what I do. So, keeping a few really nice pieces to admire really motivates me to produce more great content.
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Hahah or you can pass them down to your son/sons. Anyway I wanted to ask if you have come across a full rose gold (case and dial) Pie Pan Constellation No Date in person?
Yes sir! I've sold a few pieces. They are rare to come across. I do have one in my collection as well, reference 167.005. Still on the hunt for a matching rose gold buckle. There are a few recent posts on my Instagram page of this watch. :-)
The chrono looks good from the front, but the back of opened case looks like its been opened lots of times by a real amatuer. Scratced all round, plus the inside of lug
I'm not sure if anyone has tried to open it in the past, but I did with a very fine razor blade which cause no damage to the back. The scratches are probably from storing it in some drawer or somewhere with other items. New Old Stock is mainly a term some collectors use to describe a watch that appears in better shape than just pristine condition. It is still a used watch, and it's not new. It is perfectly fine for a collector or the watch owner to describe it as New Old Stock, but not when a dealer does, unless the piece is not for sale -just my opinion.
@@daley1985 You may have been to a watch store before. Many of them that offer a variety of brands will only carry what they have in their display cabinet. Those watches may have been tried on over and over before they finally get sold unless you are willing to wait a few days, weeks, or months for the store to order a new one just for you. So, I assume from your description that the display pieces are all used watches, even if they are not sold. That is fair enough. Thank you for your thoughts. :-)
@@TimelessHistoryChannel That's cool. Watches are to be enjoyed so I'm glad they are being enjoyed and used and treated so carefully. Thanks for pointing that out.
Yes. I am kidding myself. Most collectors do the same. Haha. But of course, I would avoid using the term nos when I am offering a product. It gets to controversial.
I'm speechless....... especially on chronograph.
Vintage Omegas are better looking than the new ones, in my opinion.
and the modern ones are too thick!
Amazing examples of great vintage Omega watches. Thank you for sharing!!
My pleasure 😊
Beautiful watches, especially the 1946 chronograph!
Thank you! 🙏
The simpler the better, those rectangular ones don't fall under that, for me. Amazing that chronograph!
Thank you for sharing
Sublime!!
Also 25+ years into Omega and very true that I am often surprised on models I didn’t even know existed.
Love your video and how you talk about the Omegas with pure passion and realism which nowadays in the “commercial” watch world is rare as it’s mostly, hey look at me look what I got when people own some exquisite pieces.
You do it true to the time when we were just a subculture back in the 90’s and 00’s.
Thanks again for sharing these wonderful pieces ❤
All the best from Amsterdam
Thank you so much for the comment. I'm glad you feel the same way! It’s a never-ending journey. Not to mention that not every Omega design can be searched on Google either. Passion and dedication will make collecting fun!
That chronograph and the constellation are beautiful
Many thanks! ☺️
These watches represent what I feel was the golden age of watch design. Thanks (again) for sharing.
My pleasure!
I'm just... I... I can't. Amazing pieces!
Haha
Hi Sao,
I totally agree with your assessment of NOS watches. 👍
Happy to hear. Thank you for your feedback
I am in love with the pie pan Constellation, but this NOS with the waffle is really outstanding. thanks so much for sharing.
You are so welcome! Hopefully I’ll get my hands on a NOS pie pan one day.
Beautiful! Thanks for sharing.
You’re very welcome ☺️
I love vintage Omegas. Thanks for sharing.
Me too! Thanks for watching!
Beautiful watches!
I see many watches of this era,but always with age related marks.So very educational to see them as a new buyer would back in the day.
They are a good example as to why Omega is a great watch manufacturer,especially from this timeframe.
Well said! Thank you for sharing
New Old Stock 😍 I m impressed beautiful Omega... Hug from Serbia 🇷🇸
Wow, how amazing to own such a collection.
Thank you! Unfortunately, to keep up with creating more of these videos, I cannot keep everything. Haha
Wow, Sao!!! Thanks for sharing!!! Blake
Any time! Thank you for the comment!
Beautiful watches - Thank you for posting the Omega NOS video.
My pleasure! Happy to hear.
Your videos actually helped me decide to pull the trigger on an old seamaster I’ve been thinking about. Would love to see you review the Aeschbach Pilots watch from MWC if you ever get the chance!
Nice! Congrats and happy for you.
Maybe if MWC send me one I can review it. :)
Wow ! Great pieces and great video.
It deserve a comeback!
Hi great stuff always nice to see such lovely condition old Omegas ❤
Glad you enjoyed. Many thanks for the feedback!
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Any time my friend , I'm glad your still uploading I like checking out these lovely watches from time to time..
As I've caught your reply on my lunch break (I'm in the UK) can I ask a question please?
I have a lovely 9ct gold Omega Geneve watch from around the 1970s.. It has an unusual case shape which is the reason I kept it when I sold my modest collection of Omega Geneve and Seamasters..
Do you think you could help me identify the reference number if I made a small upload of it?
Many thanks
Hi, I mainly focus on pieces from the 1920s to 1960s. So I can't promise that I can help you, but please feel free to send me an image of your watch to my email at: info@omeagenthusiast.com
Absolutely gorgeous. A far more elegant age.
Love vintage omegas
What the heck its a treasure❤❤❤❤❤❤
Amazing
Thank you! Cheers!
You have excellent taste.
I appreciate that. :)
Its crazy how crisp a watch looks brand new. Imo only the last watch should not be called new old stock since it was actually worn by someone as the product out in the world. Its no longer new in that case so you could say pristine or like new etc. But new old stock is right off the shelf or display, it should be like buying it today just with many years on its bones. I would be upset buying something labeled new old stock to find out otherwise. As for product photos, id still say thats is "new" along with like a person trying it on in the store because lots of products are used in photos. BUT especially when it comes to the band, if it shows any sign of wear even the slightest crease it should also be labeled display model. New is new that goes for the band being completely untouched as well.
Thank you for the comment and your input. Unfortunately, not every watch store that offers a variety of brands can afford to invest in hundreds of watches just to let their customers try them on. Not to mention that the sales rep occasionally passes by their store to offer the latest products. So many of the watches, such as Movado, Tissot, Rado, Mont Blanc, Longines, and Seiko, to name a few, that people wear are more than likely from display pieces. Over two decades ago, I worked at a retail store selling brand-name watches. The store did not carry a double of any watch. When a display piece gets sold, a new one is ordered to replace it.
Beautiful..
Many many thanks
Wonderful, again. It is very nice to see a video of these timepieces - it gives us a different perspective of what the watch looks like in person, compared to photo images (although your photos are all high quality). I agree with your definition of NOS. Thanks for the video, very interesting. Love the Seamaster.
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for the compliment:)
is this chronograph still available?
Sorry. It’s not available
I still don’t get it how you get hold of your watches. Really impressive ❤
Haha
Rectangle is my favourite one.
Thank you for sharing. It is a really interesting piece
I have a question related to old Seamasters; What references are 18K gold with a small seconds hand from the 50s, early 60s era? Thanks
There are several. Four that come to mind are 2676, 2766, 2759 and 2848. They are uncommon, but to find them in excellent and unpolished condition is a challenge.
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Thanks for the response. I will save these references and do my research.
You’re very welcome
These are stunning. Do you happen to know, adjusted for inflation, what these watches would have retailed for? Interesting to know how “affordable” they were back in the day, vs current prices. My impression is that modern, quality watches are significantly less affordable than such watches were in decades past! I get that technology and materials have moved on. But modern prices continue to race north.
Thank you for the comment. I do not have their price list. But even if you compare it with today’s pricing, a modern Omega is still many times more expensive. For example, the beefy lug in this video will cost around $1000 today, but check out the price of a modern Seamaster. That’s why not everyone can afford to wear an Omega nowadays
Thanks for your reply. I’d buy one of these NOS pieces in a heartbeat! ❤
Current Omegas are too thick , in my opinion , to be a gentleman’s elegant watch.
Ooh omega jam impian.
Lv NOS, but i would wear:) Chrono has me melting------
I should wear them now that I’ve created this video. 😆
Would tuff, it’s like a museum piece 😊
I agree
Brother watch nice
I would wear them; that’s how I enjoy them
I probably would now, too, after creating this video. Haha
What is the reference number of the first Seamaster ?
The link in the description box will take you to that video. You’ll get to learn everything about the watch. :)
Thank you.
Id still buy as NOS if it had been snapped, tag still on, no bother. Great watches btw.
Many thanks as always
Would you sell the chronograph?
Not anytime soon.
What is your opinion, on exotic leather ?
On a recent Kirby Alison video on bespoke shoes, they spoke about *Reindeer* leather and *Whale/Seal/Walrus* leather, the former was found at 100m depth, still preserved in the mud of a sunken ship from Russia, in the 17th Century. The Metta Catharina leathers, found in Plymouth.
I'm not a fan of Ostrich.
Are you ?
I ask, because I love your straps ! A goid individual and unique steap, can totally transform a watch. I think you'll agree ?
Seeing how our world has become so sensitive, I think it's best to stick to calf, gator, lizard, pig, and ostrich skin. I have tried on some vintage shark and, I believe, elephant skin straps in the past; they are really nice, too.
My vintage Omega Seamaster De Ville 14K solid gold has a number 1293722 on the inside of the case back. I consider you to be an authority on vintage Omega watches and would appreciate your comment on what this number refers to. Many thanks. Great videos, always look forward to them.
Is that the only number that you see inside the back? That is not a model reference number, but appears to be the case manufactured reference number
@@TimelessHistoryChannelThere is also the triangle Omega logo and the word ROSS and the number KL6610, which I have checked and it confirms the 14K solid gold case. The movement number on the movement also confirms that the watch dates to 1963. Many thanks for your assistance and prompt response.
KL6610 is the model reference number. This reference was made for the Norman Morris US collection. I made a whole video about it. The 7 digits number is the Ross casing serial numbers.
th-cam.com/video/-FpoIr6lvIg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=J_uxuvWHGR5nMx06
Watch that video I just sent you. It will explain everything.
On average how much are those?
Few thousand. At this point, it all depends on the seller under these conditions.
Are you selling all these watches?
Not at this moment. But feel free to visit my site to view other amazing Omega watches: www.omegaenthusiastltd.com
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Keeping them because they are NOS? Haha
You should see how many NOS Omegas I’ve sold in the past. But I also need to enjoy what I do. So, keeping a few really nice pieces to admire really motivates me to produce more great content.
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Hahah or you can pass them down to your son/sons. Anyway I wanted to ask if you have come across a full rose gold (case and dial) Pie Pan Constellation No Date in person?
Yes sir! I've sold a few pieces. They are rare to come across. I do have one in my collection as well, reference 167.005. Still on the hunt for a matching rose gold buckle. There are a few recent posts on my Instagram page of this watch. :-)
sell?
www.omegaenthusiastltd.com
NOS means never sold.
Fair enough. :)
The chrono looks good from the front, but the back of opened case looks like its been opened lots of times by a real amatuer. Scratced all round, plus the inside of lug
I'm not sure if anyone has tried to open it in the past, but I did with a very fine razor blade which cause no damage to the back. The scratches are probably from storing it in some drawer or somewhere with other items. New Old Stock is mainly a term some collectors use to describe a watch that appears in better shape than just pristine condition. It is still a used watch, and it's not new. It is perfectly fine for a collector or the watch owner to describe it as New Old Stock, but not when a dealer does, unless the piece is not for sale -just my opinion.
If a watch is worn for any reason then it is not new!
Including all the display pieces in a watch shop?
@@TimelessHistoryChannel if its tried on a wrist then its not new.
@@daley1985 You may have been to a watch store before. Many of them that offer a variety of brands will only carry what they have in their display cabinet. Those watches may have been tried on over and over before they finally get sold unless you are willing to wait a few days, weeks, or months for the store to order a new one just for you. So, I assume from your description that the display pieces are all used watches, even if they are not sold. That is fair enough. Thank you for your thoughts. :-)
I would have preferred you wore gloves to handle the watches.
I understand and thank you for pointing that out. But these are my watches at the end of the day.
@@TimelessHistoryChannel That's cool. Watches are to be enjoyed so I'm glad they are being enjoyed and used and treated so carefully. Thanks for pointing that out.
Thank you for the comment. Greatly appreciated nonetheless 😊
That is not New old Stock! 😂 kidding Yourself! They are safe queens😂
Yes. I am kidding myself. Most collectors do the same. Haha. But of course, I would avoid using the term nos when I am offering a product. It gets to controversial.