ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- 5 Amazing canard aircraft
Follow us on social media:
/ vliegnetyoutube
/ vliegnet
Aircraft:
Beechcraft Starship
Piaggio P.180 Avanti
Rutan Voyager
Tupolev Tu-144
Eurofighter Typhoon
Music:
Art of Silence - Dramatic / Cinematic
• Art of Silence - Drama...
Falling (Ft. eSoreni) by Sappheiros / sappheirosmusic
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
creativecommons....
Music promoted by Audio Library • Falling (Ft. eSoreni) ...
Credit:
TimeLapseSteve
• Beechcraft Starship de...
AOPALive
• Beechcraft Starship
TheConcordeChannel
• Video
Ultimate Military Channel
• Video
Aviation International News
• Flying at Jet Speeds i...
Luke M
• Video
Piaggio Aerospace
• Piaggio Aerospace - Co...
Skyships Eng
• Piaggio Avanti - styli...
Force Channel
• Video
Hans van Will
• Voyager, flying nonsto...
All content belong to their respective owners
Please like, comment and subscribe
The Starship is just gorgeous.
The Starship is beautiful!!!!
You forgot the WRIGHT FLYER it was a Forward Canard Rear Wing with Two Pusher Props.The First American Powered Aircraft.
Thanks, for the efforts and dedications in this video, I really appreciate.
Its a window for the flyers soul.
Thanks
The Piaggio Avanti is not a canard but a 3-surface plane. And the main reason why it is NOT a canard is because the pitch control surface (a.k.a. elevator) is in the tail, not in the front surface.
...man that Starship is a beautiful plane...
The most important and amazing canard design....Wright Flyer 1! A Canard is a horizontal control surface/s set at the forward end of an aircraft with no specification of shape rather than at the tail.
Also, the Cobalt Valkyrie. Thanks for your videos. I really enjoy them.
They are being built at KHWD... by hand. I work at an FBO right next to their hangers.
I was lucky to have been able to swing a flight on a PIAGIO AVANTI 11, from KTEB ( Teterboro NJ ) to FL exec, 1n 2017, catch a car rental, to see my sis in law, then turnaround back to NJ, the aircraft is noisy on the ground, but oh so quiet in the air, that ‘noise’ is the engine exhaust blowing into the props, so there is no need for prop deicing, as they ARE HOT. Just a beautiful aircraft,.
They've dramatically changed the noise signature on the Evo version, with slower-turning propellers.
i think i have seen Starship fly over Austin Tx several times lately
I was in a TU144, on BA static display, in takeoff mode, at a transportation museum in Sennsheim in GERMANY, when on 9/11 , yes that day, I left the USA on Sunday the 9th !
I've been in that one too!
I know that you limited your list to 5, but what about the North American B-70? It was not only technically advanced in its time but, IMHO, is also among the most beautiful aircraft.
I was thinking the same thing...
Beautifully done, Judy, thanks. I wonder if the strange buzzy sound of the Beechcraft Starship is caused by the propeller tips being so close together -- they are only spaced 8 or 10 inches from each other. Perhaps the sound limited sales?
Hs Hs The noise did NOT impact sales, what killed it, was this was the 1st COMPOSITE aircraft the FAA ever encounter for certification, and it took an abnormal timeframe, then they wanted changes, etc, so by the time it was to go into production, it was years, then the performance was less than expected, then buyers cancelled orders, like they said the rest is history, they stopped production, there a FEW flyable one out there with many spare parts. I personally never seen one in real life.
Pusher configuration propellers are quite noisy. It's due to the boundary layers of air coming off the wings, hitting the propeller arc in a condensed stream. I lived in the test flight path of the Starship as well as it arriving at the small airport I worked at nearby. The Prescott Pusher was another noisy airplane in the pusher configuration. The '50s B-36 Peacemaker was perhaps the most noisy, could be heard coming usually before visual sighting, impressive sight and sounds.
The Piaggio and the Eurofighter seem like good designs, but the Rutan Voyager is the product of a disturbed mind.
Beechcraft did not design the Starship, Bert Rutan designed the Starship
Technically, Beechcraft did as Bert was working for them at the time.
I think the Scaled Composites ATTT is quite cool
the piaggio avanti don't have canard. It has main wing and the small wing not canard
thank you! everyone thinks its a canard! used to fly them :)
I was looking for this exact comment :-)
seeing the beech starship + the piaggio. i thought : nice comparison.
when i saw the eurofighter i thought, then we will see the Rafale.
which is, in a strange way, forgotten in this video.
typhoon has already 10 reported crashes with eight casualties...
not in war missions.... exercises in peace time... with four officially caused by design problems.
supposed to be a twin engine, the eurofighter is ...most of the time.
problem is : air intakes are too close to eachother, so when you have one engine failure or engine stall,
the faulty engine sucks the air from the other engine. you had two jet engines and you re gone to none.
so, in hard times, you can not rely on a typhoon.
video doesn't show the Rafale at all despite
Rafale is canard, combat proven. behaves way better in flight.
eurofighter is just a poor copy.
one Rafale just had 1000 hour flight time with no maintenance needed.
awesome.
for all theses reasons, this video is biased.
I really don't think the Tupolev is actually a canard aircraft as the control surfaces are on the back of the wings, otherwise nice video.
The Beechcraft Canard wasn't built long enough. Refinements that could have led to greater speed and efficiency could have been produced. Too bad. A great platform, gone to waste! The Piaggio was a modified canard, with three lifting surfaces. The wing, the forward canard and the elevator all contributing to lift. Damn, what could be better than all control surfaces contributing to lift? That's about as perfect as an airframe can get! The result? Jet powered exec aircraft with a turbo prop engine setup! Talk about efficiency!!!
It was overweight and over budget, and the Avanti slaughtered it in efficiency. It would take a redesign to fix it, and then it wouldn't be a Starship.
After flying it.. it’s easy to fly the B2😁
Where is SU-47?
Look like whiskers on the plane .
the droop snooped
Darn, you put military in there ! Concorde... yes for the design but it's a fluke commercially ! How about the Long EZ, the JETEZ, the Raptor, not the military, the private one that can fly at a speed of 550KM on a single Audi 350 hp turboprop with a range of 6600 KM, the Staggers EZ... nah... your list is just OK, Except for the piaggio this is stuff that people will never see.
Tu-144? Really? Wasn't it an utter failure?
The star ship was amazing alright. It was amazingly bad. The 85% scale didn’t achieve predicted performance and the full scale version that Rutan bilked Beechcraft for was even worst. It needed more runway, cost to much, was slower carried less, had less range and was noisier than predicted by Rutan. The project was t years late trying to fix design errors and 100% over budget. It nearly sunk Beechcraft. The competition could smoke it for less money. Now I am biased for sure here but the evidence I believe backs this up.
But it looked cool. LOL.
I see people often complaining that the money could have been spent on improving current turboprops, and blame the starship for their loss. I often see people say that beauty means nothing and that it was a terrible aircraft. But you know, as nice as a marginally better King air is, it can never inspire me the same way a starship does. It was a failure, but it was beautiful.
agree, starship is s POS. Should have been shelved way back.
The Starships were failures and were all destroyed to avoid lawsuits
What a shame. Beautiful aircraft.
Actually, as I understand it, 2 units escaped the crushers. It was actually a brilliant design. The FAA killed it, though, by making it ridiculously heavy duty to offset their lack of knowledge of the then new technology of composites. The result was a heavy airframe that cost useful load and made it very expensive. The CEO of Beachcraft at the time, staked his reputation on it and when the FAA destroyed the design in regulations, he was embarrassed and had them all bought back and crushed (rather than simply retired). It IS a very sad story for all involved, especially the poor Starship!
I saw one in Colorado Springs, CO... I didn't know that any had been scrapped!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beechcraft_Starship It sounds like the starships were only scrapped because Beechcraft couldn't sell them, as of 2010, 9 were still airworthy, (including NC-51, which is probably the one I saw, and was used as a chase plane by Scaled Composites for SpaceShip One.), several are in museums. The rest were, as Chris said, scrapped for parts.
@@AviationJeremy They were scrapped because Beechcraft offered lifetime free maintenance for the aircraft and that would have cost them a fortune. They bought back aircraft and crushed them.
More like hideous
Eurofighter HAHAHA.
That plane is a pure joke !
Rafale and Gripen are way better !