The tradition is that Mark recorded Peter's sermon. We have all been in a sermon when the preacher realizes that he has gone on to long and finishes up fast which fits Mark 16:9 -20. Blessings.
Even if the codex vaticanus were the oldest it's missing the entire book of Revelation. Do we throw out the whole book on because of that? Some say the book of Revelation was in the vaticanus, but the whole book fell out. There is no evidence to support that theory. Knowing the book of Revelation was a disputed book for like 1,000 years I believe the book of Revelation was not in the vaticanus originally, because whoever produced the vaticanus did not see it as canon. So they were wrong. So do we really want to take their word over the word of the Church throughout the ages? Not just on the last 12 verses of Mark, but many other passages as well.
The tradition is that Mark recorded Peter's sermon. We have all been in a sermon when the preacher realizes that he has gone on to long and finishes up fast which fits Mark 16:9 -20. Blessings.
So your argument is that the Bible is not inerrant nor inspired nor preserved. But that mark got bored?
@@BradMcFadden No, that Peter's audience in Rome got bored. So, Peter ended it quickly.
Even if the codex vaticanus were the oldest it's missing the entire book of Revelation. Do we throw out the whole book on because of that? Some say the book of Revelation was in the vaticanus, but the whole book fell out. There is no evidence to support that theory. Knowing the book of Revelation was a disputed book for like 1,000 years I believe the book of Revelation was not in the vaticanus originally, because whoever produced the vaticanus did not see it as canon. So they were wrong. So do we really want to take their word over the word of the Church throughout the ages? Not just on the last 12 verses of Mark, but many other passages as well.