วีดีโอ

Go KJV

@ 12:46 The last 12 verses of Mark are in the Peshitta (the Syriac version of the New Testament in the Syriac dialect of Aramaic). “The Peshito(sic) is referred by common consent to the second century of our era and is found to contain the verses in question” John Burgon Dean of Oxford college 1881. By my calculation that is circa 150 AD. Even the heretic Tatian, knew that the last 12 verses were genuine because he includes them in his Diatessaron (harmony of the Gospels) which was in wide circulation by 170 AD.

@ 11:07 Those who hid the MSS in a cave in Qumran where what? Jews. What do we know about what the Jews did with scrolls which were not perfect? They didn't destroy them because the contained the word of God, buried them because then were not perfect.

@ 4:30 not only so but every existing MS of Mark's Gospel contains the last 12 verses of Mark with the exception of the 2 supposed oldest MSS

Rebuke a fool, and he will hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee. Proverbs 9:8

This guy has so many lies and mistruths and oddball reasoning I can't stand to finish listening to this.

Gosh - three assumptions about what other assuming! Very easy to make and attack straw men. Strange how many conservative and fundamentalist protestants defend an Anglican translation of an 80 book Bible by Anglican translators for use in Anglican Churches in 1611.

Quit arguing about versions and do what the version you read says.

Looks to me like Mark Ward is a member of the '' Ýea, Hath God Said? Society''., as well as the sholars union, ever learning and never coming to the knowledge of the truth.

readability is a trojan horse. the real mission is saying the Bible was buried in the dirt for thousands of years so that occultists could set us straight. Servants of Satan dont even know they are being used and abused.

Another blind cult kjvo!!!

Or you can still read the modern bibles and the KJV and consider the possibility on both sides? What’s silly about this whole argument is the fact that manuscripts of the Old Testament differed even in the days of Jesus and the apostle and you never hear about any arguments against among the apostles say avoid the Hebrew text or the Septuagint…the apostles themselves quote from Old Testament passages that have variants in their own time period and they just learned to live with it. Just compare Ephesians 4:8 which is a quote from the Greek Septuagint. Compare it to your Old Testament psalm 68:18

Or you can still read the modern bibles and the KJV and consider the possibility on both sides? What’s silly about this whole argument is the fact that manuscripts of the Old Testament differed even in the days of Jesus and the apostles and you never hear about any arguments from them saying to avoid the Hebrew text or the Septuagint…the apostles themselves quote from Old Testament passages that have variants in their own time period and they just learned to live with it. Just compare Ephesians 4:8 which is a quote from the Greek Septuagint. Compare it to your Old Testament psalm 68:18 from the Hebrew masoretic text

11:38 Zacharias was not relying _exclusively_ on hand signs. He could still hear, they could still ask "do you mean" and he could nod yes or no, and he could write, which being the same language they could understand, from his hand if not from his mouth.

"Critical" does NOT mean "critical of the traditional version." It means a text which takes as many of the New Testament manuscripts as possible into account which have been preserved throughout history. Perhaps you know that the ultimate origin of words like "critique" and "critical" is Greek κρίνω, to judge, decide.

I try them but to many verse missing so I am going to stay with my nkjv

Should that not be KingJamesVersion not NKJV ?

Thanks for your post. The New King James Version is a favorite of mine. I purchased my first copy in 1982, still have it and read it along with some specialty versions.

Some fallacies in your arguments. For example, the textus receptus is not the text the church has always had. The church who read the Codex Vaticanus and the Codex Sinaiticus did not have the text of the textus receptus.

You keep saying “I’m going to be honest.” And then become very intellectually dishonest. The plow boy line is not an insult, it’s a reference to a Tyndale quote. Also, many KJV-Onlyists truly are jerks. Very arrogant.

Interesting, just before your post came up, I listened to Jonathan Cahn's interview with Vlad Vaschuk. I also went to the link you posted. I say it with love: your post had so many inconsistencies and distortions of the truth. How can it be more acceptable than what you are accusing Jonathan Cahn of? Please don't do it to a fellow brother in Christ, who is passionate about Jesus/Yeshua The Messiah. Rather pray for him.💕

This is the video I've been waiting for. I do believe in biblical numerology, but some of this is really stretching events that seem really random and you're left not being sure why they're linked.

I've never heard of you, but if you'd accept Jesus as your PERSONAL Savior you'd understand how Jonathan Cahn is definitely of God. You also are the most boring speaker I've ever heard. You need to pray, dude. Touch not my annointed, sayeth God. And why didn't you prepare if you think he's a fake?

I have rarely heard a more rambling, disjointed, sloppy approach to applying Scripture and the working / application of prophecy from anyone.This entire exercise sounds like the ramblings of a man who utterly failed to understand the book - which is true, because he didn't even read it. You obviously didn't look very far into Mr. Cahn, or you would know he's a pastor-over a sizeable congregation- and did and does record his messages-including the one you slanderously claim he didn't say. His church is responsible for world wide gospel outreach (to both Jews and gentiles) as well as humanitarian aid given in Jesus' name all over the world - funded in part by these books. Seriously, you're not just off base here, you aren't even in the ball park. Any serious Christian may in this matter safely ignore this admitted dumb ass speaking with a man's voice. That self-applied designation is probably the most accurate thing in this video. Be warned - the Lord does not approve slandering his people. in His name.

Dear Sir. I would encourage you to delete this criticism of Jonathan Cahn. Don't understand and it is only damaging to your image. You don't even have to reply to the rebukes you are receiving because you're just making excuses. The people rebuking you here are genuinely trying to help you . Don't try to make money on the internet by criticizing someone who is truly working for God. God bless you and please find a job around the house or create your own autonomous video material instead of counter punching God's messenger.

Your criticism was never proven. You have different interpretations, but you never made your point. Maybe you should keep your criticisms to yourself. Your "Christianity" becomes suspect when you seek to build yourself up by pushing someone else down. I find no fault in the works of Jonathan Cahn. You would do well to get off social media.

Brad, Johnathan Cahn is a Rabi Preacher of Christianity at a church call HOPE OF THE WORLD. He preaches from the Holy Bible about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. i'm sure you'll enjoy the sermons and benefit. Also you can see his sermon on Oct. 6th 2023 where he does speak about what was to come the next day Oct. 7th, but he says what time that may happen is unknown. i'm a very descerning untrusting person, so when some one says something i check with history, present, behaviors, and language. please check out his sermons at his church( it's on line), study your bible deeply, possibly if you can get a Thealogin study book, and research into different religions & people groups their history & behavior for the majority of that religion group. God Bless you, dig deep into research ( of this & really anything in life) God calls us as christians to be deserning of the spirit/ others, before we make an opinion; so we don't fall into the sin of slandering or just giving our opion without 1st researching and leaving no stone unturned, otherwise we very well may be guilty of sin.

Sweetheart, you have become wise in your own eyes. The 1st mistake you made is making a video criticizing a book you admittedly have not read. The second mistake you made is not understanding that the Bible old and new testaments were written FOR us but not TO us (as Gentiles). The original recipients of the scriptures were Jews. The scriptures were both written and understood through the lens of Jewish culture. You have a whole new exciting world to explore once you realize this. I hope you will look into this. It is a joy i pray for you to receive. Jonathan Cahn is a Messianic Jew. He is descended from Moses' brother Aaron, so he is not called "rabbi" for nothing. You and I are alike I think in that we are suspicious of things that appear mystical. Nothing wrong with that. But please hear my heart: I have read all of Jonathan Cahn's books. I am an old Christian, a bit of a "Bible nerd," and I strongly support Berean approach to Bible teaching. I have been amazed by the writings of Jonathan Cahn to the point that I traveled great distance to attend the Passover seder at his church. I needed to see if he is legit. Upon investigation, he is. If you cannot get past his style of teaching, please consider looking into the teachings of the late Chuck Missler. It will help you so much. I am hoping you have done what you did with this video with pure intentions. But take advice...learn before you teach. Be led by the Holy Spirit, not by a crtical spirit. I almost envy you for being at a point where you can embark on this adventure of learning the Bible with deeper understanding! This journey has been my greatest joy and God has granted it as promised..."seek and you will find." It's like a holy algorithm! Shalom dear. You are so loved by God. Also, the Jewish see prophecy as pattern. History literally repeats itself. It's not fortune telling. Remember "written FOR us but not TO us." You cannot fully understand without this context. Also, ALL of Jonathan Cahn's books ABSOLUTELY plead for repentance and revival. Read them, dear. He NEVER claims to be a prophet, but he actually IS probably the only legitimate prophet alive today. Review the role of prophets. It's not fortune telling. Please receive this with the love with which it is sent. Do not let your pride prevent you from experiencing the joy of deeper understanding. Jonathan Cahn is a humble and kind man with an amazing ministry in New Jersey where he is the pastor of Beth Israel church. He also leads the Hope of the World international ministry. 8 or 9 #1 New York Times best seller books. If he was a phony he could have retired on the money from the 1st book! This latest book was #1 in the WORLD before it was even released. You know that Jesus' sheep hear and know His Voice. Please please reconsider your course. Take a break. Pray. Learn. Go to Beth Israel in New Jersey. Meet the man. Please consider holding your tongue until you have done these things. You know speculation is not wise and even a fool is considered wise if he remains silent. I pray for God's mercy on you for attacking one of His anointed messengers and possibly discouraging some from learning truth. You are so loved by God. Your words carry such weight. Shalom in Yeshua M'shicheinu.

Thank you for clarifying something that is so simple that is overlooked and easily swept away in the swell of rabbi’s sensationalism. I agree we need to remember that the Old Testament is announcing Jesus and his purpose. I bought and read the dragon’s prophecy and while he doesn’t convict or blame a people (army- influenced by the enemy dragon) themselves he is tying nations that are rising against Israel, however, the Mufti, Hitler, Stalin and Arafat are named exactly. (And Hamas obviously) Thank you for your post! You have very good points.

Sir, I teach Bible prophecy from a Hebraic perspective. I encourage you to learn how to study from this perspective as well so you can gain Biblical knowledge not just by reading the Scriptures. You need to understand the patterns, numerical meanings, cycles, types & shadows. There are 4 levels of study the Jewish Rabbis use. The church lost it's Jewish roots in the 1st century resulting in all the denominations of the church today. Don't misread Scripture reading with Western eyes.

If you’re going to have an argument for contradict some thing, you need to be well prepared and stop fumbling. It seems you’re unsure of verses and pronunciations. Old Testament and New Testament are very connected when it comes to revelation. You should be very careful what you say.

I don't get your beef. You use the NKJV, so why are you worried about how Mark feels about KJV Only people?? And there are some of them that are hateful. Peter Ruckman. I question whether he was even saved the way he talked about people. And so many of them say you can get saved with a modern translation, then go on for hours why that translation translation is wrong. People elevate the KJV to a place that it doesn't deserve. It wasn't the first English Bible, it wasn't even the 4th English Bible. Why is it better than those befoe it???

That the problem i had with csb bible to many verse missing i went back to my nkjv after only two day i will stay with my nkjv

how to rescur people from the KJVO trap?

did you mean the KJV translation?

He come across Smooooth.

Hmm idk if I agree with this interpretation…if we know God is going to restore Eden on the new heavens and new earth at the end of the millennium I think we will all be unclothed for eternity how it was originally supposed to be…. I think revelation and the white garmets is referring to marriage supper of the lamb and the 1000 year millennial reign there we will definitely wear clothes because some people who make it through the great tribulation will still have original sin…. In eternity there is no sin after the millennium there will be no need for clothes just like Adam and Eve experienced before the fall when there was no sin….. of course the Bible is not super specific on this topic so there is no exact or sure answer we will only know at that time but I think it will be more so like I mentioned.

This is happening in our church. Word of faith is not preached from the pulpit but I know some of our elders hold to positive confession. Our preacher is doing a “Let’s Talk” series next month and I’m trying to word my question so that he can address this but I haven’t been able to formulate my question. I don’t want to create disunity. But it needs to be addressed. Thanks for your video.

Yes, please, everybody go watch Mark Ward's video so you can see how wrong Brad is. It blows my mind that you can say that Mark Ward attacks the King James version. That dude loves the King James version

Finally a TR Lover that doesn't detest the NKJV. Praise God

All I hear in this video is I’m kjv only and refuse to check into how manuscripts work. If you want a perfect Bible learn Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek. No passage is left out either they are in footnotes and also not in original manuscripts.

Kept watching against my better judgement. You take Mark out of context more than he takes scripture out of context according to you.

You lost me when you looked up the title of the video and still got it wrong. It’s not rescuing people from the King James Version. His video is rescuing people from KJV-onlyism. Awfully manipulative of you to look up the video on camera d still misquote him in your favor.

Im sorry but this is just terrible. He says "THIS" generation, not "THAT" generation. The near demonstrative is clearly used- Jesus was referring to the generation of the disciples. They would indeed see all those things- and they did! Love your KJV/NKJV videos though. Im persuaded that the "second coming" was in 70AD. And no, geneas (1 Peter 2:9, RACE) and genos (Matt 24:34, Mark 13:30, etc, GENERATION) are not synonymous.

Whats been my saving grace: 1: KJV is my primary. 2: NKJV & NASB are my reference when needing to further my understanding of a verse FROM my primary. 3: Trusting in the Lord to guide my studies. When reading the word it has become insanely clear that not a single modern translation carries the depth of meaning in any one respective verse compared to the KJV. I literally use the modern translations because Im interested in seeing another perspective. And honestly, Im usually left feeling upset at how inadequate or how much was subtracted from a particular verse. KJV is my primary. I will eventually rid myself of my crutches (NASB & NKJV). God knows i long to.

5 mins in and you've cast non stop accusations and shown 0 evidence of them. I'm praying for you and the pool of vipers in your comments

the textus receptus isn't perfect though and disagrees with the majority text in some places.

Does Mark Ward believe in the Gospel of Christ?

KJV “attack”-NKJV “aid” 2 Kings 23:29 how can we use both if they disagree? Our church is trying to use both and this causes some problems?

The key letter in "KJV" is that V=VERSION! All "versions" are partially,more or less, PER-versions. Hundreds of clauses in KJV are not accurate translations,but suggestions. God's "word" may well be "inerrant" but is only slowly,and by research, grasped. At all times remember that God is essentially UNKNOWABLE to mortals. He is "immortal, INVISIBLE"!!!!