Discovery should be ongoing throughout the case. Most “past case” information is publicly available. If it’s a matter of gathering information, you might also consider a deposition.
@@clootenlawyer But how can a person consider a deposition if they have a *settlement conference* coming up? Wouldn't that interfere with the process of potentially settle the case?
@@notarant5107 the problem with the situation you’re describing is that you’re missing information. It’s very difficult to settle a case when information is missing. If you have an attorney, please talk to them.
![How to succeed at a Mandatory Settlement Conference [MSC]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tO9s-w9CSm4/mqdefault.jpg)
Ray get you some 270 Air max sneakers to work out and not those jordans not good on your feet working out Gav Vlog, dynamic duo❤💪🏿
What if the *defendant* inquiries about a past case or some information a week before the settlement conference?
Discovery should be ongoing throughout the case. Most “past case” information is publicly available.
If it’s a matter of gathering information, you might also consider a deposition.
@@clootenlawyer But how can a person consider a deposition if they have a *settlement conference* coming up? Wouldn't that interfere with the process of potentially settle the case?
@@notarant5107 the problem with the situation you’re describing is that you’re missing information. It’s very difficult to settle a case when information is missing. If you have an attorney, please talk to them.
@@clootenlawyer Isn't it only public if it went all the way through the court
I'm sorry but your Vibe is +/+ but it's okay.