Everytime I watch the videos under this series by Aaditya, I get a new perspective and a new approach to solve other cases! These are undoubtedly one of the best sources for case solving preparation. Thank You!!
Hi, I've confusion in the part where you broke down the 'Dollar value'- Are we cancelling all other possibilities and picked %East going down as an assumption or are we asking this to the interviewer ??
Assuming that my cost stayed same (initial assumption) the 5% decline in profit would have been only accounted by a 5% decline in revenue. Now my revenue was made of premium (P) and mid premium (M) both having equal share. Suppose my revenue earlier was x, P's contribution was 0.5x and M's contribution was 0.5x. Now, revenue went to 0.95x (5% decline) but P's contribution was given as 25%, 25% of 0.95x is 0.24x so that makes M's contribution 0.61x. Clearly our revenue hasn't declined in Mid Premium Segment. It has gone up from 0.5x to 0.61x (roughly a 40% increase)
The fact that avg $ value per item is not changing is counter intuitive since we had the prior idea that our premium segment goods have show a drastic decline , or atleast some change in the factor of revenue equation , where am i thinking wrong ?
![[13/30] Consulting Interview Case Example: Profitability (Cost side) of a Sunflower oil manufacturer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dleAyX4k0Io/mqdefault.jpg)
![[13/30] Consulting Interview Case Example: Profitability (Cost side) of a Sunflower oil manufacturer](/img/tr.png)
![[TH] RNT vs SPG - VCT Ascension Pacific - Day 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RUTkf8Detj8/mqdefault.jpg)
Everytime I watch the videos under this series by Aaditya, I get a new perspective and a new approach to solve other cases! These are undoubtedly one of the best sources for case solving preparation. Thank You!!
A great thanks to your playlist... I have been using your videos as a guide pf my prep....Thanks!!!
Hi, I've confusion in the part where you broke down the 'Dollar value'-
Are we cancelling all other possibilities and picked %East going down as an assumption or are we asking this to the interviewer ??
Assuming that my cost stayed same (initial assumption) the 5% decline in profit would have been only accounted by a 5% decline in revenue. Now my revenue was made of premium (P) and mid premium (M) both having equal share. Suppose my revenue earlier was x, P's contribution was 0.5x and M's contribution was 0.5x. Now, revenue went to 0.95x (5% decline) but P's contribution was given as 25%, 25% of 0.95x is 0.24x so that makes M's contribution 0.61x. Clearly our revenue hasn't declined in Mid Premium Segment. It has gone up from 0.5x to 0.61x (roughly a 40% increase)
The fact that avg $ value per item is not changing is counter intuitive since we had the prior idea that our premium segment goods have show a drastic decline , or atleast some change in the factor of revenue equation , where am i thinking wrong ?
Bhai tu bhut achha explained krta h.. pr teri voice clear nhi sunai deti.. try with another speaker It'll be better...
Brilliant case exhibiting problem-solving. Thanks for uploading.
Thank you Neil! Glad you found it useful!
Hey! Thanks it's a good video for people in undergrad starting off in consulting
Thank you Tejas! Glad you found it useful!
Hey Aaditya,
Would you be able to share any notes/references of your series?
Attendance!
Thanks a lot, Aaditya Sir, your sessions are very interesting and useful :)