Owning both. I definitlu took the baby ratel out of a quad I flew less and swapped it into a quad I put more time on. I swapped it with a nano 2.. the ratel is better in every way
Great timing on the video. My earlier Ratel Cameras had a shorter lens, the last 4 I have bought have this long "telephoto" lens sticks out of the frame too much. I picked up a ratel 2 and go figure it's so short I can see the 3D print in the camera view. I know 1st world problems... Using my trusty Runcam Nano 2 and you know it just works. Cant complain too much and it has a low price.
I just noticed that maybe you have the cameras reversed in the zoomed test? Looks like the footage labeled "Baby Ratel 2" shows the over exposure and other problems related to Nano 2 in other tests. But still good and very helpful video!
A little apples to oranges as you said, nano 2 is still a great simple $20 no controls camera, I think the turbo eos 2 nano is a better comparison and it has that beat.
i have the nano 2 and im slowly replacing them with toothless nano 2. my nano2 always give me surprises when i fly below the trees from light to dark. and its totally unflyable in my area past 1900 pm.
I liked the nano 2 but sold the rig it was in, and also recently replaced the turbo eos 2 in my whoopick with the toothless 2 nano starlight for the same reason that I tend to fly late and like to fly at night. Would have tried the phoenix 2 nano for my mini LR, but from what i understand it doesn't do as well in low light as the micro version so i ate the 4g and went with that. Both remind me of my micro eagle which you can practically fly by moonlight.
Great testing and comparison, dude! 😃 The Nano 2 isn't bad... But compared with the Ratel? It's not fair for the poor Nano 2! 😬😂 Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
I would want to know what do you think about the comparison between Baby Ratel2 and normal Ratel2. The specs are similar. Ist the Ratel2 better like the small baby? THX
Hello. I have 2 runcam nano 2 in my 2inch and my cinelog25 analog. 1st installed in gep whoop vtx 200mw and one in geprc 600mw vtx. Why do i see a very different quality of feed? is it because of vtx or fc? i tried to swap both cameras between the two drones but the cinelog25 quality is trash compared to the other no matter what. Is the video quality dictated by vtx, fc, camera in this case? Sure it's not about camera but i wonder why i'm seeing a very diffirent look of video.
@@ViperFPV Thanks for the reply. I forgot to mention that my cinelog25 has noise issue when the camera points to something black. so when looking at horizon, the dark trees will cause a lot of noise. I've searched about noise filtering but if i ever get to replace vtx, or fc, which one would immidieately fix it you think?
Old video but for the budget droners. The baby ratel 2 is the cam you put on your good quads...lol On your beater nothing will "beat" (badoom-tish) the caddx ant... The RunC nano 2 is junk IMHO...
![☀ Апгрейд зубочистки для максимального комфорта. [Caddx Baby Ratel]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p-Q2BR4EOr8/mqdefault.jpg)
![☀ Второе поколение вечерней камеры Рейтл. Сравнение с Toothless 2. [Caddx Ratel]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VoE23rGmOrk/mqdefault.jpg)
*Want to support me and my channel?* Buy me a coffee with _crypto._
commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/c113561f-4823-4c31-8419-df4a8fe0a210
I think you have mixed the camera views a few times in this comparison. These zoomed in looked like having swapped the sides.
Great work anyway.
I noticed this as well. There are a few places where this happens during the video.
@@IdShift good, this means at least some of use do pay attention to what they see. lol.
Noticed it too, he cropped the wrong half in post, happens to me too. And when you don't save the project after upload you're f''d
I've always had great times with the runcam nano 2. This video shows me how bad it is with light transition though.
Owning both. I definitlu took the baby ratel out of a quad I flew less and swapped it into a quad I put more time on. I swapped it with a nano 2.. the ratel is better in every way
This is a great review 👍 I love my ratel I noticed the difference between it and my runcam immediately ✌
Great timing on the video. My earlier Ratel Cameras had a shorter lens, the last 4 I have bought have this long "telephoto" lens sticks out of the frame too much. I picked up a ratel 2 and go figure it's so short I can see the 3D print in the camera view. I know 1st world problems... Using my trusty Runcam Nano 2 and you know it just works. Cant complain too much and it has a low price.
I would like to see the Ratel 2 vs Phenix micro. Nice review!
I just noticed that maybe you have the cameras reversed in the zoomed test? Looks like the footage labeled "Baby Ratel 2" shows the over exposure and other problems related to Nano 2 in other tests. But still good and very helpful video!
thought the same !
A little apples to oranges as you said, nano 2 is still a great simple $20 no controls camera, I think the turbo eos 2 nano is a better comparison and it has that beat.
I like the Nano 2 in bright light, but my Baby Ratel 1 smokes it in lower light.
i have the nano 2 and im slowly replacing them with toothless nano 2. my nano2 always give me surprises when i fly below the trees from light to dark. and its totally unflyable in my area past 1900 pm.
I liked the nano 2 but sold the rig it was in, and also recently replaced the turbo eos 2 in my whoopick with the toothless 2 nano starlight for the same reason that I tend to fly late and like to fly at night. Would have tried the phoenix 2 nano for my mini LR, but from what i understand it doesn't do as well in low light as the micro version so i ate the 4g and went with that. Both remind me of my micro eagle which you can practically fly by moonlight.
@@maceliusfpv370 toothless nano 2 is one capable fpv cam for day and night. The eos nano is slightly better than runcam nano2.
Agree to this, specially when flying under many trees with the sun above, the transition is slow but awesome camera overall
Big Caddx fan here!
Having both, the baby rattel looks way nicer
Great testing and comparison, dude! 😃
The Nano 2 isn't bad... But compared with the Ratel? It's not fair for the poor Nano 2! 😬😂
Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
I like the nano 2.
I would want to know what do you think about the comparison between Baby Ratel2 and normal Ratel2. The specs are similar. Ist the Ratel2 better like the small baby?
THX
Maybe compare the caddex ant to the runcam nano 3
good suggestion!
Hello. I have 2 runcam nano 2 in my 2inch and my cinelog25 analog. 1st installed in gep whoop vtx 200mw and one in geprc 600mw vtx. Why do i see a very different quality of feed? is it because of vtx or fc? i tried to swap both cameras between the two drones but the cinelog25 quality is trash compared to the other no matter what. Is the video quality dictated by vtx, fc, camera in this case? Sure it's not about camera but i wonder why i'm seeing a very diffirent look of video.
It could be filtering and noise from one quad to the other.
@@ViperFPV Thanks for the reply. I forgot to mention that my cinelog25 has noise issue when the camera points to something black. so when looking at horizon, the dark trees will cause a lot of noise. I've searched about noise filtering but if i ever get to replace vtx, or fc, which one would immidieately fix it you think?
Real prices.. runcam nano 2 cost 12€/15USD
Old video but for the budget droners.
The baby ratel 2 is the cam you put on your good quads...lol
On your beater nothing will "beat" (badoom-tish) the caddx ant...
The RunC nano 2 is junk IMHO...
Through your eyes which one is the closest to real life colors
Caddx camera
cool
ratel is like gopro in FPV.