THIS WORKS EVEN BETTER NOW!? | Super Quantums + Purrely DECK PROFILE (POST-DUNE) | Yu-Gi-Oh TCG

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @christianreyna5270
    @christianreyna5270 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dude you’re a genius when it comes to Super Quantals

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha, just trying to take this deck as far as it will go! Thank you for your kind words, it means a lot! 😭

  • @mambaentertainment9851
    @mambaentertainment9851 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this built

  • @hamedmahmoud7190
    @hamedmahmoud7190 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We need a Showcase in master duel with this deck pls💙

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ask and ye shall receive!!! th-cam.com/video/4uLPHiXKXWs/w-d-xo.html

  • @Ampelmann2
    @Ampelmann2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thx 🙏 new Superquant Decklist!!! I Love it ❤

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You bet!! Next up is Master Duel Platinum grind >:)

  • @kingfuruke2270
    @kingfuruke2270 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to have you back man! Great video as always!

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! And thank you for watching! :D

  • @fitkisto37
    @fitkisto37 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thats a great deck. how would you change it if you were to play it today?

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! I do have a video coming up featuring how I'd play this build now, though I also gave a breakdown in the Super Quant archetype Discord if you wanna check that out! (It's not my server I just joined it ) Here's an invite link: discord.superquantums.xyz

  • @Leanbeanburrito
    @Leanbeanburrito 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love this channel

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching! And thank you for your kind words! Keep an eye out for new content real soon! 👀 ✨

  • @thewrestler2412
    @thewrestler2412 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love your decks and ideas (even if they are not that budget friendly xD thanks purrelys for that). With a deck like that , how do you make a side deck that's good and how do you know what to take out for the side cards ?

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for watching! Yeah sadly this isn't budget friendly... Purrely is too expensive!
      For a side deck, you could put in groups of hand traps or board breakers, whichever you need to fight your current tournament scene. As for what to take out, you could take out any of the synergy cards!
      If you wanna be really wild, you could even take out all 15 of either the Super Quants or Purrelys, converting it into a full build!

  • @jonasyates5732
    @jonasyates5732 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is an awesome idea I've been messing around with ghostrick purrely and it's been pretty cool. I think the issue with purrely is it doesn't have a quick way to end games but the ghostricks making F0 puts pressure on and can lead to your opponents just scooping. The superquants also fix the slow issue with purrely however I think that the deck can be slimed down a bit I'm jus kinda worried about consistency but it's cool none the less. Keep it up man it's awesome

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If that's your concern I recommend trying to give people Santa Claws or Lava Golems in defense, and then OTK with Happiness by attacking another monster!! Happy Memory isn't limited! Thanks for watching and for the kind words.

  • @PingTPunk-rq9us
    @PingTPunk-rq9us 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you forthe explained reasoning. I didn't see how the archetypes synergies unitil this video.

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! It may be a strange mix, but it works better than one might expect!

  • @Kababic
    @Kababic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Updated deck list anytime soon?

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Next vid is focused on Master Duel, then after that I got some new Super Quant spice for the TCG!!
      Thanks for watching!

  • @nicklausdelpiero98
    @nicklausdelpiero98 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're nuts and I'm inspired.

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're awesome and I'm flattered!!

  • @aaronlawrence4218
    @aaronlawrence4218 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wanna see you play this at a locals and record duels if it's it good I'll play it because I play pure purrely right now

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'll have Locals duels on my channel some day! Don't have the equipment yet.
      Either way I encourage you to experiment because Purrely on its own is easy to beat!

  • @REDDAWNproject
    @REDDAWNproject ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this deck looks awesome, but i'm worried that the lack of non-engine slots might be pretty detrimental.

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You would think, but it's very easy to bait a few negates with the Purrely line. Then you go Super Quants and make the better boss monster!
      If you're really worried, you could always slap an extra 15 cards in for a 60 card deck. That's what I do!
      Thanks for your comment!

  • @kimokeotefan4295
    @kimokeotefan4295 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crazy deck! Around how much would this cost?

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! If you don't have ANYTHING, you'll need about $250. $100 for the Purrely stuff, $65 for Chaos Angel, $15 for Zeus, and $65 for all the rest.

  • @lcjeanfrancois2397
    @lcjeanfrancois2397 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where are the free spots ? T.T

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You could always go full crazy like me and play a 60 card deck with as many hand traps and board breakers as you like!

  • @garylloyd9949
    @garylloyd9949 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @clayinman2820
    @clayinman2820 ปีที่แล้ว

    are you in the super quant discord???

    • @PlusNfinite
      @PlusNfinite  ปีที่แล้ว

      EXCUSE ME? There's a Super Quant Discord? 👀

  • @danielramsey6141
    @danielramsey6141 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh no…