I have been playing this prelude for 40 years, really loved this. And this is early Scriabin, he got really far out later. I am glad jazz musicians recognize Scriabin.
@@felixmladenov Ravel turned into Jazz after Jazz had already become popular though. Scriabin was composing using quartal-based harmonies as early as 1907. He began using full-blown set theory based on Octatonic scales by the end of his life in 1915. He used these scales effectively to create more specific emotions and poetry in his music. So I nominate Scriabin for the “classical composer most ahead of his time” award.
@@willemjansen1141 I mean that his "classical way " of playing is not my liking because the way he plays the piece actually isn't very classical and sounds dry to my ears due to lack of expression. But that's ok, after all he is awesome at jazz
@@hugod327 i feel like he got way more expressive and natural when switching to a "jazz" approach whatever the difference might be. He just let go. His "classical" rendition is a bit lacking indeed
I love Chick and have been a fan for years. He is really a jazz master and has played with many of the greats. He is not a Scriabin specialist nor do I consider him a classical pianist. He is really teaching how to improvise Scriabin in the jazz style here.
A beginning to Jazz, Chopin also who he trained with. However Sriabin, was as dark a person as Chpin was light melodically. A dark man who was said to practice dark arts and perhaps paedophilia...err, Yes, I do still play a lot of Scriabin. It is like a distorted Chopin , full of delicious dark melodies. Everyone interprets this piece in their own way..I really enjoy Chicks interpretation, not a classical one.
Great CHICK, you should play argentinian classical composers like Ginastera or Guastavino. They works harmonies with extensives chords (with 9, 11, 13 in all the possibles combinations). I advise to play Danza De La Moza Donosa by Ginastera or, from the Diez Cantos Populares para piano de Guastavino, the number 8. Search them, listen them, and you'll fall in love whith those harmonies. Please, a video with them!!! Thanks for your music!!!!!!!
@@peterrowan9955 No one told chick that there are multiple voices in this piece and that he shouldn’t play them all the same volume. He has the sensitivity of a bricklayer.
@@7Volkan6 That´s a proof for the opposite opinion. As those were short pieces that might have had lyrics he called them "songs without words", otherwise it would have been short pieces - like Beethoven, Schubert, Brahms and all the other classical composers called them.
@@HermanIngram I think he used the term in a popular way, where everything not contemporary or public domain is considered classic. But you are right, Scriabin is considered to belong to the symbolism style, a precursor of modernism.
I have been playing this prelude for 40 years, really loved this. And this is early Scriabin, he got really far out later. I am glad jazz musicians recognize Scriabin.
Scriabin in his harmonies is the dad of jazz music
Francesco Giordano true. For me Scriabin, then Monk right next to him.
And do not forget Debussy
And Ravel
Mostly Ravel, though. Late Debussy didn't turn into jazz - Ravel quite did.
@@felixmladenov Ravel turned into Jazz after Jazz had already become popular though. Scriabin was composing using quartal-based harmonies as early as 1907. He began using full-blown set theory based on Octatonic scales by the end of his life in 1915. He used these scales effectively to create more specific emotions and poetry in his music.
So I nominate Scriabin for the “classical composer most ahead of his time” award.
Thanks for posting this wonderful video. In case you would like to read the script, look up for no. 4 instead of no.2 opus 11. Cheers. Wessel
Small correction, it's op.11 no.4
No 2 is very beautiful too btw!
Chick Corea es realmente un talento musical.😌
Era
Op. 11 No. 4 in E Minor
Scriabin never sounds like this when I play it. lol.
Yea same. But I dont like the way he plays it too much. So not complaining
@@hugod327 What do you mean? You don't like his playing? He's playing too much in your opinion? Or is his classical way of playing not to your liking?
@@willemjansen1141 I mean that his "classical way " of playing is not my liking because the way he plays the piece actually isn't very classical and sounds dry to my ears due to lack of expression. But that's ok, after all he is awesome at jazz
@@hugod327 i feel like he got way more expressive and natural when switching to a "jazz" approach whatever the difference might be. He just let go. His "classical" rendition is a bit lacking indeed
@@17xyz17 he played the notes and the score but not the music until he started improvising
Genius meets Genius. A match made in heaven!!!
Yes, it's 4, not 2
I love Chick and have been a fan for years. He is really a jazz master and has played with many of the greats. He is not a Scriabin specialist nor do I consider him a classical pianist. He is really teaching how to improvise Scriabin in the jazz style here.
Chick literally says "I'll show you one way to approach improvising with it". So your comment just shows how slow you are.
It sounds mazing! Thank you. I’d like to try it out myself, I mean one day…
fantastic !
RIP chick.
Opus 11 no. 4. Close enough for jazz.
i was going to write the same ahahah. He played no.2 live too
Thanks Spiro
RIP maestro
Scriabin would have like Chick's improvisation.
Very cool
A beginning to Jazz, Chopin also who he trained with. However Sriabin, was as dark a person as Chpin was light melodically. A dark man who was said to practice dark arts and perhaps paedophilia...err, Yes, I do still play a lot of Scriabin. It is like a distorted Chopin , full of delicious dark melodies.
Everyone interprets this piece in their own way..I really enjoy Chicks interpretation, not a classical one.
excelente.
7:25 muy "científico" :) :)
❤️
Wonderful Bequiling :)
no 2 sound difrent?!🕵️
N 4 Non 2!
Great CHICK, you should play argentinian classical composers like Ginastera or Guastavino. They works harmonies with extensives chords (with 9, 11, 13 in all the possibles combinations).
I advise to play Danza De La Moza Donosa by Ginastera or, from the Diez Cantos Populares para piano de Guastavino, the number 8.
Search them, listen them, and you'll fall in love whith those harmonies.
Please, a video with them!!!
Thanks for your music!!!!!!!
when melody goes, there goes music behind.
‘Melody is the battle-cry of amateurs’-Schumann
@@peterrowan9955 and he ended in a sanatorium.
@@peterrowan9955
No one told chick that there are multiple voices in this piece and that he shouldn’t play them all the same volume. He has the sensitivity of a bricklayer.
Incredible !
If this is a song where are the lyrics to it?
You can call a short and lyrical composition " a song" i don't see any problem.
Don't know man, try asking Mendelssohn, he wrote plenty of songs without words.
Music, songs, happiness :)
@@7Volkan6 That´s a proof for the opposite opinion. As those were short pieces that might have had lyrics he called them "songs without words", otherwise it would have been short pieces - like Beethoven, Schubert, Brahms and all the other classical composers called them.
No.4, not No.2.
great lesson. Skrijabin is not a esoteric composer!....
Not a classical one, either.
@@HermanIngram
I think he used the term in a popular way, where everything not contemporary or public domain is considered classic.
But you are right, Scriabin is considered to belong to the symbolism style, a precursor of modernism.
This is not number 2. Number 2 sounds a lot more harsh to the ear. This is number 4
I played it... Yeah... In fact I was wondering what was going on in my mind
Little pieces of enlightment.
Don’t bother playing the separate voices with different tone colors, chick.
xD
love Chick but he has no sense of Scriabin. Sounds like a computer.
Who cares about the head, it's just a formality
I would like to sound like that computer!
@@JJBerthume
Chick is a pimple on Scriabin’s ass.
@@karayuschij
Learn to sight-read.
He's demonstrating a harmonic principle. He's not trying to give a Scriabin concert
,🙄
Way too fast. Also, it's #4, e minor.
Dude... Incredible.
❤️