One end of a uniform beam of weight 222 N is hinged to a wall; the other end is supported by a wire

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @Mlainfiesta
    @Mlainfiesta 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This question has been bugging me for an hour and I can't believe it was so simple. I was making it so much harder than it needed to be. Bless this page!!

    • @eccentricriz5073
      @eccentricriz5073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lucky you, just an hour, mine was since yesterday.

  • @EagleLogic
    @EagleLogic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Such an underrated channel for physics. Blows my mind

    • @Shyzah
      @Shyzah 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah he actually shows how to do these questions in a short amount of time unlike other ones

  • @zezoowalketbi1061
    @zezoowalketbi1061 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    amazing explanation (=
    I had try it and it work correctly .

    • @guggystyle
      @guggystyle  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +zezoow alketbi Thank you for the compliment!

  • @Zephyr-tg9hu
    @Zephyr-tg9hu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. Realized my mistake right away, I forgot to account for the vertical component of the hinge force!! I have a final tomorrow lol.

  • @sandiobulaon1567
    @sandiobulaon1567 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Figure a uniform beam with a weight of 60 N and a length of 3.2m is hinged at its lower end, and a horizontal force F of magnitude 50 N acts at its upper end. The beam is held vertical by a cable that makes angle ? = 25° with the ground and is attached to the beam at height h = 2.0 m. What are? (a) The tension in the cable and (b) The force on the beam from the hinge in unit-vector notation?

  • @johnmeehan599
    @johnmeehan599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    u are a fucking legend wny.

  • @jorgemunoz1105
    @jorgemunoz1105 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When he finds Vertical Force of the hinge, why isn't the weight halved again? like how he did when finding the tension of the wire.

  • @glxu7627
    @glxu7627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you!

  • @xxdarkxsunxx
    @xxdarkxsunxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great video!, curious though. How come we use sin60 for the W*(L/2)sin60 and sin30 for T*L*sin30. Thank you

    • @ninjamonk37
      @ninjamonk37 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When doing torques of the beam, you must use the perpendicular component of the forces to the surface then multiply it by the distance from the point of rotation. This perpendicular part comes from the definition of torque being the cross product of the position vector and force.

  • @annabelleelikan4541
    @annabelleelikan4541 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you know the weight causes it to move CW?

  • @clarkpadilla6446
    @clarkpadilla6446 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you rotate clockwise but why is it negative tho????? it should be positive

    • @washingtonsibusisosanga2087
      @washingtonsibusisosanga2087 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i was baffled too but that's how it works, its in relation to the XY plane plotting that mathematicians use.

  • @virendrasharma1185
    @virendrasharma1185 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This question is from which book ?

  • @malito245
    @malito245 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this is wrong if you work with different angles.

  • @mohamedarab6187
    @mohamedarab6187 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir i still don"t understand how the two angles equal each other and also why not Lsin120 but Lsin60 because as usual the T=f*L*sin theta(the angle btw the force and perpendicular force

    • @cadmiumbop
      @cadmiumbop 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      sin120 and sin60 are the same

  • @TheAsmrany
    @TheAsmrany 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    love you :**

    • @guggystyle
      @guggystyle  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Abdullah altamimi Oh . . .thank you!