@@gotanon9659 Yeah, I kept expecting to see the Iwo Jimas somewhere in there. I also expected to see the Brooke Class, which had both Standard and ASROC, unlike the Perrys.
The Forrestal actually has a much more infamous nickname, Forrest fire. When John McCain was on board, a missile accidentally lit off and started a fire that almost destroyed the ship.
Unfortunately I can't claim the real honor of the title. It's more of a nickname my mates gave me, to cheer me up/give me shit XD I aspired to the role. However, a minor medical condition removed the chance. but that didn't remove my passion, so now I aim to inform. Thanks for you service, if you were one of the faithful o7
I would suggest one improvement. Start from the oldest sub in the class and work your way up. That is way easier to follow and we can see the improvements.
I appreciate the tips. The video was built this way for searchability. Invariably, when the game releases, I expect people to search for specific ship classes for info. For those with only surface knowledge of classes and ship types. Alphabetical order will be easier to sort imo. Going forward for any further vids, I will take your tips under advisement.
@@CmdrTyrael Chronolohical order for each class would make for a beter viewing experience Comvine this with time stamps in the description to make searching for a certain ship easiest Great video btw!
"Your nation is calling." with Uncle Sam holding out a mobile phone. Brilliant. You had me at that. The US Military should use that if they ever need to surge recruitment numbers. Honestly. I think I'd enlist.
Depending on your age IOWA is your ship, Your Fathers ship, Your Grandfathers ship, Your Great Grandfathers ship, whatever the case it is definitely America’s ship! Pinned comment & cookie to the dude that Timestamps the video first o7
@@Milchreismitschoko2 sure will! I've covered the Soviets and will work on the remaining warships of minor nations. Will also cover aircraft in a separate video
The fastest submarine was actually the Soviet Papa-class, which was recorded doing 44 knots. She actually exceeded her design speed in early trials and ended up ripping off her own control surfaces. Apparently her water intake grills were forced into her water circulation pumps and ground up.
@derpderpson2188 you're correct! The record set by the Skipjacks in the late 1950's was nabbed by Papa, she was fast! Although she is considered a one-off and not a full production sub. Ripping off the control surfaces is something out of rocket science. she must have pushed the crew back in their seats 🤣 Thanks for commenting
My favourites: All of the supply ships, ALGOL, Austin, Charlston, Kilauea ans Newport. For warships it would OHP, Knox, Virginia and Galveston. The latter for her RIM 8 Talos missiles, I love that missile.
The latter half of the CF Adams class were built with the single arm launcher rather than the older twin arm, it had nothing to do with NTU or later upgrades
For me tyreal i really like Us navy carrier Where i rated uss enterprise Uss nimitz Where the defense roll will be The uss forrestal But i will the wait the new prototype Like the soviet mig56 to meet his rivalry To carry more missile Where 1 a7 corsiar or other jet fighter. Can. Turn in to missile truck to. Carry a lot of air to air missile That will be super weapon for the carrier of it
I hope the Devs are able to rework the flight ops for the LHAs and carriers in the future (something like fleet command), it's a little too simplified for my liking. Also, quite the shade thrown at my favorite missile cruiser to end it, but such is life and budget cuts. Last note, I prefer if the warships were introduced in order of oldest to newest, and grouped by ship type.
Thanks for watching, mate. I stuck with alphabetical to assist with search after release. I expect alot of novices to search by class name rather than ship type. Also, it forces you to look at the little boats. (Which I love the most) 💀
So my grandfather served on the the USS AUSTIN I don't which refit they in the game but when I showed him the ship in the game he said when he served they didn't have the gun shields for the 3 inch guns
@warj3217 that's Interesting, I'm not sure which specific refit it is. Probably 1985 at the latest. Thanks for the info! Thank your grandfather for me, too! 🫡
I'm hoping a few more models will make the cut during early access. They have stated there are more to come. Want to see long hulled Perry Long Beach and a few more carrier types.
This was a mixture of in-game encyclopedia for unit stats and armaments (there is a chance of change during early access) so as to be relevant to the game. All other info provided was personal knowledge or general knowledge regarding the classes. Navsource.org is a good site for reference information.
This timeframe with the lack of VLS aegis ships any surface scenario without a carrier will leave the US as little more than targets for the supersonic Soviet missile systems.
Aircraft wise will they have Hornets? I would like to do a gulf of sidra scenario from 1986 and some of the carriers at least were transitioning to hornets.
I don't know if you can pass any comments to the developers of the game, can we have a split screen option, so one screen will have the map and its controls and the other to have the 3d models? And if we can edit the UI for both screens ? The other, can they add counter for casualties on board and if they can recover them? Are we gitting VLS early 2000 ships in a DLC? Great work man, but I love the Russian ships more 😅😊
I can certainly pass those suggestions on! They were along the same line of thinking as my own. casualty count and search and rescue would be amazing. save crew and move them aboard other ships. The separate screen would be a godsend, so we can enjoy the models and watch the combat whilst planning and making moves. My next video at Hormuz Highlights this. when i try to plot a realistic course, without it being a map simulator. AS for ships to come, I know there are a few still to be added over the course, and that if things go well. we will get more fleshed out nations like RN. I do know that i can't wait for modders to make me the ultimate game XD.
Thanks for the quick response, I would love if they add the split screen 😊 One more thing, regarding mooding and mission creation, can add nations with no big navy's. I have a scenario in my mind, that I want to create. In this 1999 scenario, the Egyptian navy has four Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates and two Knox-class frigates (given to the Egyptian navy throughthe 1990s), while the Israeli navy has four Dolphin-class submarines equipped with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles and Sa'ar 3 and 4-class corvettes. The mission can be played from either side. Hostilities between Egypt and Israel have broken out, and the Egyptian Military Intelligence Agency has information indicating that Israel is attempting to deploy their submarines into the Mediterranean. Egypt's orders are to intercept all four submarines. The Egyptian air force and air defense will provide four to five hours of air cover and keep the Israeli Air Force (IAF) occupied by attacking Israeli airfields. Meanwhile, Israel will deploy its Sa'ar corvettes to assist their submarines in breaking through the Egyptian navy's blockade. The mission objective is for Egypt to destroy the submarines in under five hours before the IAF can start attacking Egyptian warships.
Why is the Ohio class not in the game? Didn't they technically participate in the Cold War? As well as the Long Beach cruiser and the Enterprise carrier.
I really hope so. At this stage, the only difference is Forrestal has F4J as its Fighter. Which is less capable than the F14a for interception. I want there to be a clear difference in launch rate.
I'm coming over to this game from command: modern operations. With an attention to detail fans refer to as 'autistic'. Naval warfare just seems to bring out the need for precise attention to every detail. Detail that needs to be modeled out for every ship in the fleet. None of them are ever exactly the same. But aircraft ready times by elevator number? Yeah, it's GOT to have that. Critical.
@@CmdrTyrael The thing I want to see is how the Soviet missile doctrine stands up to a campaign where you fire off everything and then you have to head back to port vs Nato or American CVN ability to resupply and carry on fighting.
It really feels like the soviets have a rather silly advantage, and were given practically non existant aircraft carriers for fun I guess? Hoping for updated ticos, LA flights maybe
In terms of perceived capability, the soviets do appear to have the advantage ship to ship. However, I think if the US leverages airpower properly (and the scenarios try to be somewhat realistic) Then US should be able to find and lockdown the soviets. I also don't think the Soviet fleet will get much better than currently. The problem will be trying to close the distance with the Soviet ships, (without being detected) to use Harpoon. USA will really need to use its fighters, to intercept AShM. US subs will also be quiet and super capable compared in the sensor department compared to their Soviet counterparts.
@@CmdrTyrael The victor 3s can give US subs a run for their money but yes other than that you're right on the subs. As for the air game, I thought about this and have to disagree until the AI can figure the heck out what it's supposed to do with planes. Currently, an AI controlling planes basically seems utterly inept, meaning any advantage that the US hardware would confer is well, meaningless. A human doesn't need any hardware advantage killing enemy planes from what I've seen, since they tend to just suicide themselves lol (@_@) If the AI is ever able to use planes decently, then yes the US advantage should be a nice boon
Admittedly I haven't used airpower a great deal. Only a few scenarios, with minor assets. I do hope the air game is decently fleshed out AI wise. I really crave that 3 dimensional aspect of the combat. managing subs, choppers, air assets and surface assets, really is the dream for me. I just hope we can have a challenge worthy of the effort. new age chess is what i want.
@CmdrTyrael I think that only time will tell, but it's probably possible to come up with a way to make functional AI in the tactical sense-- strategic might be tricky but yeah I hope that the AI is decent at all aspects of the game Making an AI for the dynamic campaign if that's what they're doing must take a lot of resources too, that campaign could be insanely fun if done right
@@TheIceDragon225 It's admittedly difficult to make an AI that is tactically adept but we're intent on making sure whatever 'final' AI we end up with will be a challenging and entertaining opponent, at least on the level of what Fleet Command had.
If you want to be noticed by the "algorithm" it's all about numbers these days. The title will invariably change 4 times to keep it relevant. You have an election to thank for that 🫡 Thanks for watching
![เปิดบ้าน นาราเครปกระเทย 1 ไร่ ขายขาดทุนหลัก10ล้าน เอามาใช้หนี้!!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jz84VFWVP4/mqdefault.jpg)
Subs
2:50 Benjamin Franklin
3:25 James Madison
3:55 Lafayette
4:25 Los Angeles (flight 1)
4:50 Permit
5:15 Skipjack
5:45 sturgeon
Surface vessels
6:10 Iowa (battleship)
7:42 Adams (Early)
8:20 Adams (late)
8:45 adjutant (minesweeper)
9:04 aggressive (minesweeper)
9:25 ALGOL (roll on-roll off)
9:43 USS America (aircraft carrier)
10:21 Austin (landing ship)
10:47 Belknap (missile cruiser)
11:23 Charleston (landing ship)
11:48 coontz (missile destroyer)
12:25 USS forrestal (aircraft carrier)
13:09 Galveston (missile cruiser)
13:42 Garcia (Frigate)
14:20 Gearing (Destroyer)
15:20 KIDD ( missile destroyer)
15:50 Kilauea ( Ammunition ship)
16:14 USS kitty hawk ( aircraft carrier)
17:02 Knox (frigate)
17:50 Leahy (missile cruiser)
18:30 Newport ( Tank landing ship)
18:51 USS Nimitz (aircraft carrier)
19:34 Pegasus (patrol hydrofoil)
19:59 Oliver hazard Perry class ( frigate)
20:17 Spruance (destroyer)
20:49 USS Tarawa ( amphibious assault ship)
21:59 Ticonderoga (missile cruiser)
22:40 Virginia (missile cruiser)
I think these are all
Btw really informative video
🏅 Medal of Merit Awarded (United States Naval Intelligence)
"All hail the cube" He says on the Ticonderoga, when I'm waiting for the true cube to be added to this game, the USS Long Beach CGN-9.
Lol I forgot about the cube Bearing Long Beach.
That one is like a floating monument 💀
@@CmdrTyrael More likely to be added by the modding community like the Burkes but we shall see, maybe the devs wanna be quirky.
@@jakevanderveen9213 Pretty sure that in their Dev timeline it is said that more ships will be added and from different nations as well
@@gotanon9659 Yeah, I kept expecting to see the Iwo Jimas somewhere in there. I also expected to see the Brooke Class, which had both Standard and ASROC, unlike the Perrys.
The Forrestal actually has a much more infamous nickname, Forrest fire. When John McCain was on board, a missile accidentally lit off and started a fire that almost destroyed the ship.
You're absolutely right! The Forrestal incident is a significant part of naval history. That was certainly a series of unfortunate events.
@CmdrTyrael Every sailor has to watch the video during chipboard fire fighting school.
@CmdrTyrael Were you a Cmdr?
Unfortunately I can't claim the real honor of the title. It's more of a nickname my mates gave me, to cheer me up/give me shit XD
I aspired to the role. However, a minor medical condition removed the chance.
but that didn't remove my passion, so now I aim to inform.
Thanks for you service, if you were one of the faithful o7
Even though McCain didn't cause the fire, some McCain haters created conspiracy theories that he started the fire that he fired the zuni rocket.
Missed the chance to say "Knowledge isn't just power; it is SEA POWER."
Damn that's a good one!!
I would suggest one improvement. Start from the oldest sub in the class and work your way up. That is way easier to follow and we can see the improvements.
I appreciate the tips.
The video was built this way for searchability. Invariably, when the game releases, I expect people to search for specific ship classes for info.
For those with only surface knowledge of classes and ship types. Alphabetical order will be easier to sort imo.
Going forward for any further vids, I will take your tips under advisement.
@@CmdrTyrael
Chronolohical order for each class would make for a beter viewing experience
Comvine this with time stamps in the description to make searching for a certain ship easiest
Great video btw!
@@AttiliusRex Agreed. Age before alphabet 😹
"Your nation is calling." with Uncle Sam holding out a mobile phone. Brilliant. You had me at that. The US Military should use that if they ever need to surge recruitment numbers. Honestly. I think I'd enlist.
Glad you liked that! I literally woke up to that idea. So I'm glad it was effective!
I might have to land a job at the Ministry of Truth 💀
Ay, perfect thing to wake up to! Let's go! Thanks for, presumably, another 30 hours of effort!
It's the least I could do for the freedom of the seas.
Awesome overview, looking forward to seeing more ships being added post launch such as Enterprise, Long Beach and Midway to name a few
The fleet MUST expand...
Depending on your age
IOWA is your ship,
Your Fathers ship,
Your Grandfathers ship,
Your Great Grandfathers ship,
whatever the case it is definitely America’s ship!
Pinned comment & cookie to the dude that Timestamps the video first o7
Where is the Enterprise?
@spectrastar2749 not present as of the making of this video
Thanks for making this video, it's neat seeing all of their 3d models with info
The game has become my new screensaver!
Love that you show of all the units! Do you plan on doing videos about the rest of nato and other ships? Sea Power has a lot to offer!❤
@@Milchreismitschoko2 sure will!
I've covered the Soviets and will work on the remaining warships of minor nations. Will also cover aircraft in a separate video
@CmdrTyrael Happy to hear that!😀
Amazing video! Please keep up the amazing content!
First two and a half minutes could be an intro for this game. Nicely done!
I served on a Kidd class. USS Callaghan DDG 994. Can't wait to play her in this game.
Thanks for your service, mate 🫡
Tough little ships, the Kidd. I hope you enjoy your time playing.
Im so frickin happy that the "Coldwaters Cast"[all the subs] came back for Seapower🥳‼️‼️‼️‼️
@@taylorlance2737 cue music **The boys are back in town** 🤣
Underrated channel af
The fastest submarine was actually the Soviet Papa-class, which was recorded doing 44 knots. She actually exceeded her design speed in early trials and ended up ripping off her own control surfaces. Apparently her water intake grills were forced into her water circulation pumps and ground up.
@derpderpson2188 you're correct! The record set by the Skipjacks in the late 1950's was nabbed by Papa, she was fast! Although she is considered a one-off and not a full production sub.
Ripping off the control surfaces is something out of rocket science. she must have pushed the crew back in their seats 🤣
Thanks for commenting
just to say that this video was "full of knowledge" would be a brutal understatement. See you soon in the Microprose PR-Department, probably
i love the starship troopers type of media!
Thx 4 the Nato Units vid! Very helpful and very entertaining! 👍💪☺️
Glad you enjoyed!
You earned a sub here my dude thumbs up 👍 keep up the good work
Thanks, will do!
My favourites:
All of the supply ships, ALGOL, Austin, Charlston, Kilauea ans Newport.
For warships it would OHP, Knox, Virginia and Galveston.
The latter for her RIM 8 Talos missiles, I love that missile.
RIM-8 is a monster 💀
That’s a such old game, that get me nostalgic
Nice job👍
15:10 That Iowussy got me acting unwise
No, I'm not sorry.
Calm down old salt.
There is plenty for everyone 🤣
Thanks for these vids!
No worries!
Love these videos!
Thanks for watching mate! Your support means a lot to me!
I'm currently serving on the Eisenhower cvn 69 and i can't wait to have full control of her once the game is out.
@darthrevan454 you will be able to prove to the boss, you can do it better! 🤣
Thanks for serving mate 🫡
@@CmdrTyrael thank you for your support!
Cant wait for the 12th!!
The latter half of the CF Adams class were built with the single arm launcher rather than the older twin arm, it had nothing to do with NTU or later upgrades
You are correct. Thanks for clarification on that.
Thanks for the video man
@@eulisratna4725 my pleasure 🫡
I'm hoping that add the Des Moines class cruisers, they're my favorite cruisers if not my favorite class of warship.
For me tyreal i really like
Us navy carrier
Where i rated uss enterprise
Uss nimitz
Where the defense roll will be
The uss forrestal
But i will the wait the new prototype
Like the soviet mig56 to meet his rivalry
To carry more missile
Where 1 a7 corsiar or other jet fighter. Can. Turn in to missile truck to. Carry a lot of air to air missile
That will be super weapon for the carrier of it
@@maxelsoro6292 The Americans are terrified of encountering more MIG-56.
I wonder what the US will come up with in reply.
Thanks for watching 🫡
Thanks you for making the US Version of all Nato units.
🇺🇸💪 You're welcome!
My father served on the USS Truxtun in the early 70's
Would have been special to serve on a unique ship.
Thanks to your father for his service 🫡
I hope the Devs are able to rework the flight ops for the LHAs and carriers in the future (something like fleet command), it's a little too simplified for my liking. Also, quite the shade thrown at my favorite missile cruiser to end it, but such is life and budget cuts.
Last note, I prefer if the warships were introduced in order of oldest to newest, and grouped by ship type.
Thanks for watching, mate.
I stuck with alphabetical to assist with search after release.
I expect alot of novices to search by class name rather than ship type.
Also, it forces you to look at the little boats. (Which I love the most) 💀
So weird seeing aircraft carriers without the now ubiquitous F/A-18 Hornet.
I agree! I really want to see thegame broach the early 90's for the airpower
So my grandfather served on the the USS AUSTIN I don't which refit they in the game but when I showed him the ship in the game he said when he served they didn't have the gun shields for the 3 inch guns
@warj3217 that's Interesting, I'm not sure which specific refit it is. Probably 1985 at the latest.
Thanks for the info! Thank your grandfather for me, too! 🫡
Very well done!!!! ......But WTF Sea Power....where is the USS Enterprise and Midway class carriers!?!?! Plus the USS Long Beach CGN was a beast!!!!
I'm hoping a few more models will make the cut during early access. They have stated there are more to come.
Want to see long hulled Perry
Long Beach and a few more carrier types.
I hope they'll add more of the Submarines from the 50s and 60s. The GUPPY boats, the early nuke boats and so on. Same with the Soviet side of course.
I think that modders will dump a multitude of ships and boats on us 💀
I think we will get everything eventually! Lol
Hell yeah
Did you use the in game unit encyclopedia. or was there a book/s that you used as additional reference?
For both this and the soviet videos.
This was a mixture of in-game encyclopedia for unit stats and armaments (there is a chance of change during early access) so as to be relevant to the game.
All other info provided was personal knowledge or general knowledge regarding the classes.
Navsource.org is a good site for reference information.
Cool video, will we get a Soviet Fleet Tour? Just curious, thanks
Already uploaded the other day my friend. I made the Soviets first 🫡
@@CmdrTyrael Oh,ok, I missed it, I'll check it out, Thanks
OBLIGATORY COMMENT FOR THE ALGORITHM‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ fire vids keep it up
Ten days to go.
Wish the aircraft carrier dummy elevators were just empty instead of having planes on them.
The X Com music good taste
awesome! maybe do one for aircraft?
That's the plan!
@@CmdrTyrael nice! tysm for all the info
Iowa vs Kirov would be great to see
You forgot to mention an addition to the Forrestal-class, the USS Zippo
This timeframe with the lack of VLS aegis ships any surface scenario without a carrier will leave the US as little more than targets for the supersonic Soviet missile systems.
PRAISE THE CUBE
A nickname for the OHPs and other FFGs was the forever f**king gones since they were always being deployed
Haha, I guess that's what happens when you're a "low capability workhorse"
Aircraft wise will they have Hornets? I would like to do a gulf of sidra scenario from 1986 and some of the carriers at least were transitioning to hornets.
I don't know if you can pass any comments to the developers of the game, can we have a split screen option, so one screen will have the map and its controls and the other to have the 3d models? And if we can edit the UI for both screens ?
The other, can they add counter for casualties on board and if they can recover them?
Are we gitting VLS early 2000 ships in a DLC?
Great work man, but I love the Russian ships more 😅😊
I can certainly pass those suggestions on! They were along the same line of thinking as my own.
casualty count and search and rescue would be amazing. save crew and move them aboard other ships.
The separate screen would be a godsend, so we can enjoy the models and watch the combat whilst planning and making moves.
My next video at Hormuz Highlights this. when i try to plot a realistic course, without it being a map simulator.
AS for ships to come, I know there are a few still to be added over the course, and that if things go well. we will get more fleshed out nations like RN.
I do know that i can't wait for modders to make me the ultimate game XD.
Thanks for the quick response, I would love if they add the split screen 😊
One more thing, regarding mooding and mission creation, can add nations with no big navy's.
I have a scenario in my mind, that I want to create.
In this 1999 scenario, the Egyptian navy has four Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates and two Knox-class frigates (given to the Egyptian navy throughthe 1990s), while the Israeli navy has four Dolphin-class submarines equipped with nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles and Sa'ar 3 and 4-class corvettes.
The mission can be played from either side. Hostilities between Egypt and Israel have broken out, and the Egyptian Military Intelligence Agency has information indicating that Israel is attempting to deploy their submarines into the Mediterranean. Egypt's orders are to intercept all four submarines. The Egyptian air force and air defense will provide four to five hours of air cover and keep the Israeli Air Force (IAF) occupied by attacking Israeli airfields. Meanwhile, Israel will deploy its Sa'ar corvettes to assist their submarines in breaking through the Egyptian navy's blockade.
The mission objective is for Egypt to destroy the submarines in under five hours before the IAF can start attacking Egyptian warships.
That's a great idea for a scenario!
If you create it, I will Play it!!
I am trying to build a rendition of OPERATION PRAYING MANTIS
Well let's wait for the game to come.out, and I will make it 😊.
I can't wait to play this game, I think the community will make this game great 😊
Why is the Ohio class not in the game? Didn't they technically participate in the Cold War? As well as the Long Beach cruiser and the Enterprise carrier.
@beemy.6923 because the game will be in early access, and they have not implemented "every vessel" yet.
More ships will be added, before full release.
@ ah that makes more sense, thank you for the clarification.
Do you think the devs will make the extra elevators functional?
without extra elevator what's the advantage of a kitty hawk versus a Forrestal?
I really hope so. At this stage, the only difference is Forrestal has F4J as its Fighter. Which is less capable than the F14a for interception.
I want there to be a clear difference in launch rate.
@@CmdrTyrael Agreed, meanwhile i've subbed(nothing like Red Alert clips!!). can't wait to see more!
I'm coming over to this game from command: modern operations. With an attention to detail fans refer to as 'autistic'. Naval warfare just seems to bring out the need for precise attention to every detail. Detail that needs to be modeled out for every ship in the fleet. None of them are ever exactly the same. But aircraft ready times by elevator number? Yeah, it's GOT to have that. Critical.
Any news on a campaign scenario?
@ericworst there was an early access roadmap released today. I haven't had a chance to unpack it yet. But I did see a mention of dynamic campaign
@@CmdrTyrael The thing I want to see is how the Soviet missile doctrine stands up to a campaign where you fire off everything and then you have to head back to port vs Nato or American CVN ability to resupply and carry on fighting.
Dude doesn't even like vegemite on toast.
Do I hear battlestations pacific music?
Close but not quite.
Music was
Call of Duty: Cold war
Xcom 2: ready for battle
Lawbreakers: various artists 🫡
I thought the USS Sacramento was in game?
It is, I covered that one in one of my missions (Vietnam) and forgot to cut the clip across.
the other ship missed was the second variant of Leahy
Does this game have a good campaign? Better then Cold Waters?
@@JesseKF no campaign yet as it will be early access.
There is a road map for dynamic campaign
@@CmdrTyrael Thank you
Warthunder when ?
arleigh burke ddg where??????
@blaisepascal3804 Arleigh Burke is not within the scope of the game.
1985 is the cut off. Burke is 1988.
Modders or DLC will have to fill that need
@@CmdrTyrael Oh, didnt know about the 1985 cutoff. thanks!
Rest assured Burke is the hottest topic on the forum. Everyone wants it. I'm sure they will cave to pressure 🤣
@@CmdrTyrael haha i hope so!
8:50 waht?
Yeh, minesweeper are still important... and usually expendable 😂
Pure BOTE power 💀
@@CmdrTyrael i am honst i dint want to look up again of the wooden mine swiper ship lol
It really feels like the soviets have a rather silly advantage, and were given practically non existant aircraft carriers for fun I guess? Hoping for updated ticos, LA flights maybe
In terms of perceived capability, the soviets do appear to have the advantage ship to ship. However, I think if the US leverages airpower properly (and the scenarios try to be somewhat realistic) Then US should be able to find and lockdown the soviets. I also don't think the Soviet fleet will get much better than currently.
The problem will be trying to close the distance with the Soviet ships, (without being detected) to use Harpoon.
USA will really need to use its fighters, to intercept AShM.
US subs will also be quiet and super capable compared in the sensor department compared to their Soviet counterparts.
@@CmdrTyrael The victor 3s can give US subs a run for their money but yes other than that you're right on the subs.
As for the air game, I thought about this and have to disagree until the AI can figure the heck out what it's supposed to do with planes. Currently, an AI controlling planes basically seems utterly inept, meaning any advantage that the US hardware would confer is well, meaningless. A human doesn't need any hardware advantage killing enemy planes from what I've seen, since they tend to just suicide themselves lol (@_@)
If the AI is ever able to use planes decently, then yes the US advantage should be a nice boon
Admittedly I haven't used airpower a great deal. Only a few scenarios, with minor assets.
I do hope the air game is decently fleshed out AI wise. I really crave that 3 dimensional aspect of the combat.
managing subs, choppers, air assets and surface assets, really is the dream for me.
I just hope we can have a challenge worthy of the effort. new age chess is what i want.
@CmdrTyrael I think that only time will tell, but it's probably possible to come up with a way to make functional AI in the tactical sense-- strategic might be tricky but yeah I hope that the AI is decent at all aspects of the game
Making an AI for the dynamic campaign if that's what they're doing must take a lot of resources too, that campaign could be insanely fun if done right
@@TheIceDragon225 It's admittedly difficult to make an AI that is tactically adept but we're intent on making sure whatever 'final' AI we end up with will be a challenging and entertaining opponent, at least on the level of what Fleet Command had.
Really trying to appeal to the lower common denominator with that title, aye? Good lord
If you want to be noticed by the "algorithm" it's all about numbers these days. The title will invariably change 4 times to keep it relevant. You have an election to thank for that 🫡
Thanks for watching