Crazy how people think they can own your home and squat in it for a lifetime. The politics in SF are crazy. This is why the city falls apart. These tenants act like they are the ones with their life savings on the line for these houses.
Lol if she has lived there for 30 years im sure this man has plenty of money and propeties. How is she squating this poor lady obviously is low income and pays her rent every month you rather kick her to the street?
@@dnyboy209 yes, the scum would like to kick her out on the street so they can gouge other people for twice the rent. Landlords are greedy scumbags. Never met one I liked. Corporate landlords also have employees who only care about their own needs, not yours. And I have had the displeasure of working next to quite a few of them. Most of the pro landlord scumbags here rent out their basements, it makes them feel like they are the "lord" of old.
@@dnyboy209 Yes, if she cannot afford to keep up with the city's inflation over 30 years. Its time to relocate to a city that works for your expenses. The idea everyone gets to stay where they live today, no matter what, is just illogical. The idea that a landlord does not get the chance to upgrade their tenants/property to build better neighborhoods is why portions of the city remain in poverty for decades. The strategies are broken. Theres no reason to have a single block of poverty in SF with the amount of tech and money. Get the ghetto carjackers out of the city. Stop defending low value people. Stop defending nonsense. Use a brain for once. Its time to actually build a better city. Everyone cant innovate their lives like the rest. Thats ok, theres millions of milage of empty land in America. You dont get the right to hold back your neighborhood and whither away on someone else's door step. CLEAN UP THE CITY. BOOT OUT THE GARBAGE. Put skin in the game and commit or LEAVE. Ive rented to thousands of ppl in SF. Regular ppl, ghetto ppl and rich 1%ers. Ive seen them all flee. The rich cant always survive too. THIS GOES TO EVERYONE. Commit or leave the city. Enough excuses.
"Capital improvements" mean more than just changing out appliances, painting, and new counters. It has to be major improvements when the tenant must vacate for 30+ days... total remodel of the units.
so the tenant wants the place to be fixed..... landlord is taking action to fix the place..... she complains of the noise of the hammers by the people fixing the place she asked to be fixed?
you don't think the landlord wants to fill in the spot? there are plenty of businesses that would but what you are not reporting are the nimby and bureacrats that won't issue permits for just any business. Here's the situation summed up: City: fill your vacant stores with businesses Landlord: okay how about a smoke shop or cannibis shop City: woah woah woah pump the breaks Landlord: okay i'll keep it vacant while still paying property taxes and commercial mortgage City:.... we are also going to fine you
Have you ever been to San Francisco? This is a city that is surrounded on three sides by water. Once you have built to the water, there is nowhere else to build. There also is a limit placed on new construction that is a necessary part of maintaining ecological and population issues that arise from to many people crammed into a shrinking amout space. Your proposal lacks any understanding that 750,000 people in San Francisco is enough.
Not necessarily true. You have a finite amount of land (supply) available versus even more people wanting to live here (demand). Sure, we can amend the zoning codes to address the housing crunch, but it's not as simple as throwing away the rule books and bulldozing all structures without extensive consultations from long-time and newer residents.
If the lady would earn enough money for herself that she could live wherever she wanted this wouldn't be a problem. People like you always think the public should be taxed more to pay for lazy people like this woman. Why shouldn't she work harder?
@NATHANIEL GILLIES Outside the city. We have multiple governmental entities that address regional issues, not just San Francisco, including the Association of Bay Area Governments, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the Bay Conservation and Development Authority, among others. All of them hold multiple jurisdictions around the city and beyond, such that other counties in the San Francisco Bay Area must collaborate to build more housing in the region.
She has lived at that place for 30 YEARS, since 1989. It was the landlord who was ignorant and insulting, and him not talking to KPIX to set the record straight means he has so much baggage hiding behind him and his family.
Yeah but the unit he rents to her is rent controled so she pays a very low monthly rent rate compared to the 5,000 a month he could be charging when it is fixed. So even if it takes a while to kick out the tenant with rent control he will make his money back in a few months with market rate rent
Crazy how people think they can own your home and squat in it for a lifetime. The politics in SF are crazy. This is why the city falls apart. These tenants act like they are the ones with their life savings on the line for these houses.
Lol if she has lived there for 30 years im sure this man has plenty of money and propeties. How is she squating this poor lady obviously is low income and pays her rent every month you rather kick her to the street?
@@dnyboy209 yes, the scum would like to kick her out on the street so they can gouge other people for twice the rent. Landlords are greedy scumbags. Never met one I liked. Corporate landlords also have employees who only care about their own needs, not yours. And I have had the displeasure of working next to quite a few of them. Most of the pro landlord scumbags here rent out their basements, it makes them feel like they are the "lord" of old.
So he’s fixing all the things you recorded so carefully. You’re still unhappy…..😐
@@dnyboy209 Yes, if she cannot afford to keep up with the city's inflation over 30 years. Its time to relocate to a city that works for your expenses.
The idea everyone gets to stay where they live today, no matter what, is just illogical.
The idea that a landlord does not get the chance to upgrade their tenants/property to build better neighborhoods is why portions of the city remain in poverty for decades. The strategies are broken. Theres no reason to have a single block of poverty in SF with the amount of tech and money. Get the ghetto carjackers out of the city. Stop defending low value people. Stop defending nonsense. Use a brain for once.
Its time to actually build a better city. Everyone cant innovate their lives like the rest. Thats ok, theres millions of milage of empty land in America. You dont get the right to hold back your neighborhood and whither away on someone else's door step. CLEAN UP THE CITY. BOOT OUT THE GARBAGE. Put skin in the game and commit or LEAVE.
Ive rented to thousands of ppl in SF. Regular ppl, ghetto ppl and rich 1%ers. Ive seen them all flee. The rich cant always survive too. THIS GOES TO EVERYONE. Commit or leave the city. Enough excuses.
"Capital improvements" mean more than just changing out appliances, painting, and new counters. It has to be major improvements when the tenant must vacate for 30+ days... total remodel of the units.
so the tenant wants the place to be fixed..... landlord is taking action to fix the place..... she complains of the noise of the hammers by the people fixing the place she asked to be fixed?
you speculate bullshit to make an irrelevant argument...
Why on earth would she want to go back there?
you don't think the landlord wants to fill in the spot? there are plenty of businesses that would but what you are not reporting are the nimby and bureacrats that won't issue permits for just any business. Here's the situation summed up:
City: fill your vacant stores with businesses
Landlord: okay how about a smoke shop or cannibis shop
City: woah woah woah pump the breaks
Landlord: okay i'll keep it vacant while still paying property taxes and commercial mortgage
City:.... we are also going to fine you
With the mentality of "if I don't live here no one else can"
If there was enough housing bring built this would not be a problem
Have you ever been to San Francisco? This is a city that is surrounded on three sides by water. Once you have built to the water, there is nowhere else to build. There also is a limit placed on new construction that is a necessary part of maintaining ecological and population issues that arise from to many people crammed into a shrinking amout space. Your proposal lacks any understanding that 750,000 people in San Francisco is enough.
Not necessarily true. You have a finite amount of land (supply) available versus even more people wanting to live here (demand). Sure, we can amend the zoning codes to address the housing crunch, but it's not as simple as throwing away the rule books and bulldozing all structures without extensive consultations from long-time and newer residents.
If the lady would earn enough money for herself that she could live wherever she wanted this wouldn't be a problem.
People like you always think the public should be taxed more to pay for lazy people like this woman. Why shouldn't she work harder?
2inchfromtheground nobody is being taxed. There should be more home supply to ease demand.
@NATHANIEL GILLIES Outside the city. We have multiple governmental entities that address regional issues, not just San Francisco, including the Association of Bay Area Governments, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the Bay Conservation and Development Authority, among others. All of them hold multiple jurisdictions around the city and beyond, such that other counties in the San Francisco Bay Area must collaborate to build more housing in the region.
So, it was her fault for moaning about the conditions of the house? Owner was fed up and kicked her out the easiest way possible
She has lived at that place for 30 YEARS, since 1989. It was the landlord who was ignorant and insulting, and him not talking to KPIX to set the record straight means he has so much baggage hiding behind him and his family.
But the landlord still isnt making anything while the house is vacant 🤔
Yeah but the unit he rents to her is rent controled so she pays a very low monthly rent rate compared to the 5,000 a month he could be charging when it is fixed. So even if it takes a while to kick out the tenant with rent control he will make his money back in a few months with market rate rent
If a person needs to move out temporary then make the landlord cover their hotel rental while they are moved!
Bet they will get it fixed fast!
Parasitic thinking. Buy your home
If construction goes on longer then 12weeks I believe you have the right to money for alternate accommodations
Landlords are terrible
Old fart vs. Old fart
Team support to stick to the man people's
looks like he lives in piedmont or oakland hills. but his mercedes benz old and shitty. X)
Lengthy renovations .... poor contractors, milk the money, too.
He should place the race card