i have a question: since the 1.4 dosen't have WR how "fragile" is to dust water and so on compared to the f2 WR cause i want it for street so im inbetween those two. please answer :)
I've used the 23mm f/1.4 in light rain with no issues. That being said, if you're trying to shoot in more inclement conditions then I'd recommend you get the 23mmf/2 since your lens and camera will be better protected with a WR lens.
Ginori Photography & Film Thanks for the answer i've asked because i didin't know how fragile the 1.4 is but i very rare shoot in the light rain so yeah
I don't think the 23mm 1.4 is sharper. I don't believe it has less contrast. Sharpness is a perceived value. The 23mm 1.4 has good/solid detail contrast and edge contrast, which makes an image appear sharper in depth. The 23mm F2 has issues at F2 at close range..but at F4 the 23mm F2 has superior structure sharpness. That firmly places the 23mm 1.4 as a character lens. Character lens are commonly called so because the design focus of detail contrast and edge contrast give better colour depth and tonality (largely called the zeiss/leica pop) If one designs a lens for this purpose (typical molded/rounded elements in the center element groups) then the lens will suffer at the edges when it comes to fine detail. The 23mm 1.4 has this attribute..however to a lesser value of the 35mm 1.4 vs the 35mm F2..the 35mm 1.4 is also a character lens..and the 35mm F2 is a performance lens. Hence why you hear so many fuji say the 35mm 1.4 has a specific 'magic' and the 35mm F2 is super sharp..they were built with different design focuses. I do agree though, the 23mm 1.4 is a superb lens despite its many, many quirks.
david neville hi there, it appears you are very knowledgeable about fuji lenses. I have a question: i am a minimalist by nature and it bothers me to have various lenses and not being used frequently, so I decided to have only 2 lenses for the xt30, I already have the 56/1.2 and would like to chose one of these three, 18-55, 23/1.4 and 35/1.4. I included the 18-55 for its ois and the very few times i shoot videos. 35/1.4 for its sharpness but is it too close to 56 in FL? And the 23/1.4 for its FL but everyone says its not as sharp as the 35/1.4 at 1.4 (i tried all the f2 primes but they aren’t for me) I m not a pro and only shoot street jpegs and family stuff. Would appreciate your input... thanks
It is kinda hard to make a recommendation without seeing your work. I am a little surprised you don't already own the 18-55,..as it is most peoples first fuji lens with a fuji camera. My best advice is the 18-55 is the most ideal pick for someone who doesn't want a large lens collection. One lens that covers many focal lengths. However if you decide on the primes, and already have the 56..then I would go for the 23. I love the 35, but the 23 will probably provide more versatility for you. However, I would also recommend looking at the second hand market. I see the 23mm and the 35 both appear regularly in excellent condition. In their second hand state, they both cost you less than the 23 brand new..which ever you decide to roll with, any lens that has been kept in mint/clean condition holds it value well and typically isn't hard to sell if you're only asking a fair and reasonable amount.
david neville thanks david. I have the 18-55mm but don’t seem to use it, so I thought I should replace it with a prime. I prefer the 1.4/1.2 lenses because I mostly shoot family stuff indoors, probably that’s the reason 18-55 doesn’t get used much.
True, I totally forgot about that! This lens is plenty fast, and I don't feel that having a faster lens than this is going to fundamentally improve the way it shot. Not once have I thought that having the 23mm f/2 would have helped me get a shot that I couldn't have gotten with my 23mm f/1.4, so I'm quite satisfied with the AF performance. Also, the AF noise is not as bad as people make out to be. The way I look at it is, if my Rode mic doesn't pick it up when recording with it, then it really isn't as big of a deal as some might suggest.
I've had no problems with the AF performance when recording video, but I'm not moving a lot in my videos either. I would say that if you're going to be using it on newer bodies like the X-T3 or X-T30 then that shouldn't matter as much. Also, when I have an external mic it doesn't pick up any noise when in AF-C, so that's not a concern either. Still, if you're looking for the fastest on for video then your safe bet would be to pick up the 23mm f/2, and you'll have the peace of mind that it's the fastest AF Fuji currently offer in that focal length.
Treat yourself on a *square metal hood for your 23mm* since it is your favorite lens. Does not make better pictures this way but it just looks so good! The standart plastic flower pedal hood is not pretty at all and is actually for a zoom lens which it is not obviously. *Tip 23mm square metal hood also fits the 56mm* like a glove and looks just stunning! If you have 16mm 1.4 also buy a square metal hood for that than if you have the money to spend that is of course... If you want the square metal hood but are short on cash there are also third party options like JJC. Much blessings and keep on shooting!
This video should give you an idea as to what to expect when shooting in full auto: th-cam.com/video/l-R8m3_2n08/w-d-xo.html It's not a super fast lens, especially when compared with the newer f/2 versions, but depending on what you're going to be shooting you will get decent results. If you want to focus on just video then I suggest you go for the 23mm f/2 instead, but if you do both then get the f/1.4 if you can.
@@GinoriYT thank you, yes i need for both photo and vdo. Here in france the price of the f1 is not that much more then the f2, i guess because the f2 is newer? But the f1 to me looks like is a better lens and i can only get one with my xt3. So didn't know if I should get the f2 or f1. many ppl say f2 is great but many other think f1 is better haha.. Hard to decide.
DOF is determined by the sensor size, not lens format. The 23mm f/1.4 it's a true f/1.4 regardless of image circle size. DOF equivalence is what you're probably referring to.
@@ChimaChindaDev of course the lens is 1.4 regardless of the sensor, but because the sensor is smaller, an APS-C camera with a 23mm 1.4 lens gathers the same amount of light and has the same DOF as a full frame camera with a 35mm f/2.1 lens
@@GinoriYT when converting values from full frame to APS-C, you need to multiply focal length by crop factor as well as the aperture. The ISO is multiplied by crop factor squared. With these adjustments, two images will have comparable FOV, DOF and noise. Thus, a 23mm 1.4 APS-C lens multiplied by 1.5 produces images similar to a 35mm 2.1 lens on a full frame camera.
There are very few sample shots. This is insufficient. There is no video sample capture. I usually tell video selfies. You should show more sample shots.
I agree, it's definitely not the nicest-looking hood out there. There is a Haoge square hood that you can buy if you want the lens to have a stylish look.
That's interesting, I've never heard that before. I've been asked if I'm from New York, but I'm Puerto Rican with a slight accent, and most people pick it up quickly.
![สาวเมืองเพชร - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEt7F9PvO3I/mqdefault.jpg)
i have a question: since the 1.4 dosen't have WR how "fragile" is to dust water and so on compared to the f2 WR cause i want it for street so im inbetween those two. please answer :)
I've used the 23mm f/1.4 in light rain with no issues. That being said, if you're trying to shoot in more inclement conditions then I'd recommend you get the 23mmf/2 since your lens and camera will be better protected with a WR lens.
Ginori Photography & Film Thanks for the answer i've asked because i didin't know how fragile the 1.4 is but i very rare shoot in the light rain so yeah
Great video! Looking forward to more reviews in this style!
Thank you! I’ll be sure to use this format more!
This over the 23mm f/2 for sure. The 23mm f/2 has horrible hazy softness at close focusing distance
I don't think the 23mm 1.4 is sharper. I don't believe it has less contrast. Sharpness is a perceived value. The 23mm 1.4 has good/solid detail contrast and edge contrast, which makes an image appear sharper in depth. The 23mm F2 has issues at F2 at close range..but at F4 the 23mm F2 has superior structure sharpness. That firmly places the 23mm 1.4 as a character lens. Character lens are commonly called so because the design focus of detail contrast and edge contrast give better colour depth and tonality (largely called the zeiss/leica pop) If one designs a lens for this purpose (typical molded/rounded elements in the center element groups) then the lens will suffer at the edges when it comes to fine detail. The 23mm 1.4 has this attribute..however to a lesser value of the 35mm 1.4 vs the 35mm F2..the 35mm 1.4 is also a character lens..and the 35mm F2 is a performance lens. Hence why you hear so many fuji say the 35mm 1.4 has a specific 'magic' and the 35mm F2 is super sharp..they were built with different design focuses. I do agree though, the 23mm 1.4 is a superb lens despite its many, many quirks.
david neville hi there, it appears you are very knowledgeable about fuji lenses. I have a question: i am a minimalist by nature and it bothers me to have various lenses and not being used frequently, so I decided to have only 2 lenses for the xt30, I already have the 56/1.2 and would like to chose one of these three, 18-55, 23/1.4 and 35/1.4. I included the 18-55 for its ois and the very few times i shoot videos. 35/1.4 for its sharpness but is it too close to 56 in FL? And the 23/1.4 for its FL but everyone says its not as sharp as the 35/1.4 at 1.4 (i tried all the f2 primes but they aren’t for me)
I m not a pro and only shoot street jpegs and family stuff.
Would appreciate your input... thanks
It is kinda hard to make a recommendation without seeing your work. I am a little surprised you don't already own the 18-55,..as it is most peoples first fuji lens with a fuji camera. My best advice is the 18-55 is the most ideal pick for someone who doesn't want a large lens collection. One lens that covers many focal lengths. However if you decide on the primes, and already have the 56..then I would go for the 23. I love the 35, but the 23 will probably provide more versatility for you. However, I would also recommend looking at the second hand market. I see the 23mm and the 35 both appear regularly in excellent condition. In their second hand state, they both cost you less than the 23 brand new..which ever you decide to roll with, any lens that has been kept in mint/clean condition holds it value well and typically isn't hard to sell if you're only asking a fair and reasonable amount.
david neville thanks david. I have the 18-55mm but don’t seem to use it, so I thought I should replace it with a prime. I prefer the 1.4/1.2 lenses because I mostly shoot family stuff indoors, probably that’s the reason 18-55 doesn’t get used much.
You didn't talk about the notorious AF speed and noise, but just FYI, the AF speed is more than acceptable on my X-T3.
True, I totally forgot about that! This lens is plenty fast, and I don't feel that having a faster lens than this is going to fundamentally improve the way it shot. Not once have I thought that having the 23mm f/2 would have helped me get a shot that I couldn't have gotten with my 23mm f/1.4, so I'm quite satisfied with the AF performance.
Also, the AF noise is not as bad as people make out to be. The way I look at it is, if my Rode mic doesn't pick it up when recording with it, then it really isn't as big of a deal as some might suggest.
I'm debating between this or the f2. AF for stills isn't my concern but what about for video? Does this lens have a lot of focus breathing?
I've had no problems with the AF performance when recording video, but I'm not moving a lot in my videos either. I would say that if you're going to be using it on newer bodies like the X-T3 or X-T30 then that shouldn't matter as much. Also, when I have an external mic it doesn't pick up any noise when in AF-C, so that's not a concern either. Still, if you're looking for the fastest on for video then your safe bet would be to pick up the 23mm f/2, and you'll have the peace of mind that it's the fastest AF Fuji currently offer in that focal length.
Treat yourself on a *square metal hood for your 23mm* since it is your favorite lens. Does not make better pictures this way but it just looks so good! The standart plastic flower pedal hood is not pretty at all and is actually for a zoom lens which it is not obviously. *Tip 23mm square metal hood also fits the 56mm* like a glove and looks just stunning! If you have 16mm 1.4 also buy a square metal hood for that than if you have the money to spend that is of course... If you want the square metal hood but are short on cash there are also third party options like JJC. Much blessings and keep on shooting!
Thanks for the heads up, I might end up picking one up!
The Best lens of Fuji
Agreed! If I could only own one lens, this would be it.
Ginori Photography & Film is this better than 16mm
I have not tried the 16mm f/1.4, so I can't comment on its performance.
Your photos are beautiful! Are those out of camera jpeg?
Thanks! The majority of the shots were SOOC Jpegs, but a few of them were processed in Lightroom.
Hi, is the automatic focus on the Xt3 fast enough on this lens ?
This video should give you an idea as to what to expect when shooting in full auto: th-cam.com/video/l-R8m3_2n08/w-d-xo.html
It's not a super fast lens, especially when compared with the newer f/2 versions, but depending on what you're going to be shooting you will get decent results.
If you want to focus on just video then I suggest you go for the 23mm f/2 instead, but if you do both then get the f/1.4 if you can.
@@GinoriYT thank you, yes i need for both photo and vdo. Here in france the price of the f1 is not that much more then the f2, i guess because the f2 is newer? But the f1 to me looks like is a better lens and i can only get one with my xt3. So didn't know if I should get the f2 or f1. many ppl say f2 is great but many other think f1 is better haha.. Hard to decide.
5:22 it's also FF f/2 in terms of light gathering due to the APS-C sensor crop factor
DOF is determined by the sensor size, not lens format. The 23mm f/1.4 it's a true f/1.4 regardless of image circle size. DOF equivalence is what you're probably referring to.
ANON Depth of field and angle of view but not light gathering. It’s 1.4 for that regardless of sensor.
@@ChimaChindaDev of course the lens is 1.4 regardless of the sensor, but because the sensor is smaller, an APS-C camera with a 23mm 1.4 lens gathers the same amount of light and has the same DOF as a full frame camera with a 35mm f/2.1 lens
@@GinoriYT when converting values from full frame to APS-C, you need to multiply focal length by crop factor as well as the aperture. The ISO is multiplied by crop factor squared. With these adjustments, two images will have comparable FOV, DOF and noise. Thus, a 23mm 1.4 APS-C lens multiplied by 1.5 produces images similar to a 35mm 2.1 lens on a full frame camera.
ANON great job on the detailed explanations 👍🏼
There are very few sample shots. This is insufficient. There is no video sample capture. I usually tell video selfies. You should show more sample shots.
I’m not a fan of the clutch focus at all
Love the lens but the hood has to be the ugliest one in existence 😁
I agree, it's definitely not the nicest-looking hood out there. There is a Haoge square hood that you can buy if you want the lens to have a stylish look.
@@GinoriYT I got the haoge lens hood and it looks amazing! Too bad I can't put haoge lens hood on when I have a lens filter.
Have anyone mentioned that you speak like an African American
That's interesting, I've never heard that before. I've been asked if I'm from New York, but I'm Puerto Rican with a slight accent, and most people pick it up quickly.
Lol. Ok ok I will bite.....how do we speak???