What is the Durand Line Issue?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 306

  • @zarlishta976
    @zarlishta976 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Im pashtun from kpk and we dont recognize it as a border .. its just a line and this kpk belong to Afghanistan..this is their land

    • @tajdarkazmi21
      @tajdarkazmi21 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get out of Pakistan if you like Afghanistan that much 🤬🤬🤬
      Durrand line is Pakistan and no-one can take it from us 💪🇵🇰

    • @Abhirao10200
      @Abhirao10200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@tajdarkazmi21 they will take it .india will help them

    • @bilalwardak1999
      @bilalwardak1999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tajdarkazmi21 if you support imaginary lines created by the British to cause division between muslims around the world then sure.

  • @naim_sulaimankhel
    @naim_sulaimankhel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am Pashtun from Paktia, my hometown is not far from Durand line, usually Pashtuns from the other side of Durand line like to come here if there is a wedding and we also love to go accross the Durand line too if there is a wedding. Pashtun tribal relation is very strong, we are same religion, same people, same norm. We are unlike Punjabi who hate their own people accross the Indian border because of religious difference. All Pashtuns are one religion, similar dialects, one people. Why would we hate each other and block each other?

    • @Gr8putin
      @Gr8putin ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Excellant Bhai that's why we like afghanis

    • @talhahussain3132
      @talhahussain3132 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We don't hate our indian punjabi brothers and sisters don't spread false news

    • @acrobat6217
      @acrobat6217 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are more than welcome to go there permanently

    • @94A4.GH01
      @94A4.GH01 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@talhahussain3132 yes we do

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said brother. Love from India

  • @muhammadjunaidbasharat9273
    @muhammadjunaidbasharat9273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    His English skill is more interesting than Durand line issue to me....

  • @user-el7ii2vm5p
    @user-el7ii2vm5p ปีที่แล้ว +9

    No Afghan alive or dead will accept the Durand line NEVER 🇦🇫

  • @usamatariq8715
    @usamatariq8715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Well articulated Sir, But I think your content should be better in urdu with English subtitles because majority of the audience can’t understand English properly. If not, Then at least the subtitles should be in urdu so everyone could understand this intricate conflict 👍🏻

  • @baryalaiahmad2568
    @baryalaiahmad2568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The agreement was for 99 years which already passed 129 years, which is now Afghanistan’s land up to atak bridge.

    • @muhammadusama6040
      @muhammadusama6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Show me where it is written that the agreement was for 99 years? It's not shitty pata khazana, it's international agreement.

    • @amazingamx1255
      @amazingamx1255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadusama6040 all of Pakistan is historic Afghan land before the Europeans stole it from us. All Pakistanis (Punjabis and sindhis) must leave

    • @aAverageFan
      @aAverageFan ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@amazingamx1255 Punjab and Sindh are historical Indian lands whereas KPK & Baluchistan are historical Afghan lands

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aAverageFan you mean Pakistan is an illegal land of Afghanistan and India

    • @Ddireland
      @Ddireland 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@muhammadusama6040 makh Dey ruksha, kpal khalko sara ular osa.

  • @sher-lm6rx
    @sher-lm6rx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Pakistan has every right to defend itself.

  • @pakistanzucks
    @pakistanzucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Its not called "international border with Pakistan"
    It is and will be British colonial imposed artificial durandline seperating Afghan tribes! And we afghans will never recognize any foreign imposed borders.

    • @peschannel9815
      @peschannel9815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why not?
      We Pathans are Pakistanis

    • @pakistanzucks
      @pakistanzucks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@peschannel9815 you are not Pakistani your identity is Afghan if you are pashtun! Your kings are afghan your history is Afghan your language pashto is afghan! Pakistan is irrelevant!

    • @peschannel9815
      @peschannel9815 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pakistanzucks But I live in Pakistan and born in Pakistan
      Family in Pakistan
      Work in Pakistan
      🙂

    • @muhammadusama6040
      @muhammadusama6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Afghans lost war and gave all this area and its people to British in exchange for money. Shameless afghans should have some gharat

    • @thewayiamblue229
      @thewayiamblue229 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadusama6040 They have always been fighters and have survived 40 years of war, calling them shameless is akin to spitting in the sky.

  • @Stop1war
    @Stop1war 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lying is very bad Mr Pakistani 😢
    We’re Pakhtuns and we will have it back it doesn’t matter if it takes 100 years. 😢

    • @Markhor579
      @Markhor579 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stop crying lundian bot

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Markhor579 m a dar-ch-od idhar bhi tereko India hi dikh raha hai. Lagta hai teri am-mi ko India walo ne ch-oda tha

  • @stangerdanger7252
    @stangerdanger7252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Afghan talk about family getting divided by this border !
    Well, Tajik, Uzbek, turkmen ethnic groups of Afghanistan also are divided by 3 border walls because of Afghanistan. There are countries of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan right on the Western/northern border of Afghanistan.
    Why letting those families divide like that? Why not hand those regions which is 70% of Afghanistan to Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan ? Please Afghanistan don't divided those brothers and sisters like that. You need to remove those 3 Durand lines first.

    • @AAdab77
      @AAdab77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      This Durand line dispute is just an excuse. Afghans consider Pakistan soft and perhaps stupid compared to Iran, Uzbek, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. It's time Pakistan take hard stand as it has done more than enough for Afghans yet they show no respect towards us.

    • @UnstoppableEmpire
      @UnstoppableEmpire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AAdab77 the only good we ever did in Afghanistan was from 1979-1988. After that we were pests that should not have ruined the country.

    • @AAdab77
      @AAdab77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@UnstoppableEmpire well Pakistan (read Pakistani establishment) was doing everything coz of it's insecurities. But that doesn't mean one should target Pakistani public who openly helped, supported and most of the times tolerated over 4 million refugees for more than 4 decades. So much so, they hate Pakistan more than Russia or US. Whatever we did was far less than what he'll Russia and US brought on them yet they only blame Pakistan is the real problem for me.

    • @AAdab77
      @AAdab77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@UnstoppableEmpire I better not use the term "pests" but our govt and establishment was just looking for its own interests selfishly is how I would describe the situation.

    • @iliaszahir3135
      @iliaszahir3135 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Khurasan WILL come back. This is a promise. And then Israel is finished

  • @---GOD---
    @---GOD--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You believe the line drawn by the British Empire should remain in tact forever? Do you say the same about Israel? What about Kashmir?

    • @globalcitizen1856
      @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The people who divided Kashmir are Pak army!

    • @---GOD---
      @---GOD--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@globalcitizen1856 true, and that's why we still fight til this day to re-unify the entirety of Kashmir back with Bharat. But the current line is drawn by British/UN.

    • @abdulahadkhan557
      @abdulahadkhan557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@---GOD--- haha you said in another comment that you were Pashtun and called out your bull shit... Now you yourself said you are from India

    • @---GOD---
      @---GOD--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@abdulahadkhan557 I've never said that. You're drinking too much 🐪🐫 p

    • @naim_sulaimankhel
      @naim_sulaimankhel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@---GOD--- Kashmiri do not want with India actually, they deserve their own country. Kashmiri, Nuristani, Chitrali, Kohistani, Gilgit-Baltistani, Pashayi deserve their own country together. They are unique people, as Pashtun, we love them. We should redrawn the line to divide the country truly based on nation

  • @InfinityandEternity
    @InfinityandEternity ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This guy has explained nothing.

  • @shuaibq
    @shuaibq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Another excellent well informed video. Well done TCM, keep up the good work. Do you have a patreon I can donate to?

    • @TCMOriginals
      @TCMOriginals  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Shuaib. Kindly find the Patreon link here: www.patreon.com/thecentrummedia

  • @AwaisAhmadKhan-y5w
    @AwaisAhmadKhan-y5w ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm Pashtun I don't recognize this line, This lines divided Pashtuns.

  • @usmantariq399
    @usmantariq399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Well explained... border should be secure as secure with india.....

    • @thespatulaa
      @thespatulaa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Ghost0fPakistan it's already being done , it had already started in early 2008's had the PPP government paid attention to it we might have curbed a lot of terrorist attacks

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly bro. Thanks to Pakistan that we don’t have to deal with these Talibans. They’re more dangerous

  • @kashifrajput5411
    @kashifrajput5411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for covering

  • @globalcitizen1856
    @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    British represented British India and not Pakistan! That is because British India got divided into 3 countries in 1947. British established boundaries for political & administrative convenience. Those borders were not cultural demarcations. Pashtuns are Afghans and have no connection with Pakistanis who are offsprings of Mughals. Why should the world respect Pakistan's false claims? Pakistan did not even exist before 1947. Why should Afghans be willing to be part of Pak?

    • @Dankseid-o1u
      @Dankseid-o1u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      pakistanis have no connection with mughals who were uzbeks, mughals were exiled to Burma after 1857.

    • @globalcitizen1856
      @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dankseid-o1u Did any muslim belonging to South asia claim that? Pakistanis look middle-eastern. Though they might carry a small percentage of native genes because of the native women who were originally abused, Pakistanis are primarily middle-eastern or central asian - look at their habits, the way they look, their culture, practices & rituals, life values, their history, political systems, food habits etc. Pakistanis are offsprings of mughals & other foreign tribal marauders who occupied local land & resources. What was the 2-nation theory about? Why did native societies fight wars of independence against muslims & other foreigners like Tipu sultan & Akbar etc? Why did founders of Pak & other muslims fight for an Islamic state in 1947 while native citizens fought for independence from muslims & British? Recently a lot of fiction is being created to legalize false claim of Pakistanis & to mainstream Pakistanis as being natives of the south-asia.

    • @Dankseid-o1u
      @Dankseid-o1u 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@globalcitizen1856 pakistanis are but Hindus, Buddhists and Jains of those areas who were forcefully converted. Now they pretend to be arab and central asian.

    • @naim_sulaimankhel
      @naim_sulaimankhel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@globalcitizen1856 only Pashtun and Baloch are Middle-Eastern, Pashtun are close to ancient Bactrian, Baloch are closer to Kurds and Omani. The rest like Punjabi and Sindhi are just Indian

    • @globalcitizen1856
      @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@naim_sulaimankhel Nobody becomes Punjabi or Sindhi by living on the land that once belonged to native Punjabis & Sindhis. Culturally native Sindhis & Punjabis are very contrastingly different from Pakistanis. Pakistanis are descendants of Central Asians. That is why they look very different

  • @ragnarking9896
    @ragnarking9896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Durand line was a pact with the British to agree ob a sphere of influence. When British empire collapsed, this agreement should have been nullified. Btw, we afghans don't accept any British made lines anyways. Unless Pakistan sees Itself as part of Britain. Then that's a different story.

  • @khanafghanistan3591
    @khanafghanistan3591 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We never accept the bloody Durand line 🇦🇫❤️🌹

    • @acrobat6217
      @acrobat6217 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We do

    • @khanafghanistan3591
      @khanafghanistan3591 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you work for me I will sand you good salary just delete pakr army

  • @farazkhan7035
    @farazkhan7035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very good journalism. keep up the good work

  • @---GOD---
    @---GOD--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "Its sanctity has to remain"
    No. No it does not. The Durand Line never made any sense because it divided the Pashtun people, giving a good sizeable amount of their land and people to Pakistan.
    The line must be redrawn. Either Pakistan gives up KP and tribal regions willingly, or the Taliban take it by force. One thing for sure is that this line is not remaining as it once was.

    • @SR-te2db
      @SR-te2db 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The comical and sad part about this is that Pakistan understands the divisive nature of this artificial line that split an entire ethnic group within their own land. Tragic legacy of imperial slavery mindsets.

    • @---GOD---
      @---GOD--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@SR-te2db of course they do. Just like they split Punjabis, Kashmiris, and Bengalis. Hope those lines vanish in the future.

    • @abdulahadkhan557
      @abdulahadkhan557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@---GOD--- you really think Taliban can take it by force?... No way in hell

    • @beautyzline5194
      @beautyzline5194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hmmm we are waiting for this kind of action by some thugs and then teach them some lessons if today the Pashtuns are in power in Afghanistan it's all because of Pakistan otherwise Tajiks and uzbeks were crushing them and show them their real place

    • @jigafez
      @jigafez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      It doesn't divide pashtuns, what the hell are you on about, only three tribes, wazir, shinwari and mohmand, the majority of them are in Pakistan anyway. By that token we should remove all borders around the world. Whether it be West Bengal and Bangladesh, Switzerland should have no borders with Italy,Germany,France etc too. I am pashtun and have no links or ties with Afghanistan. 50 million pashtuns call Pakistan their home, they have been part of the Indus and Gandhara Civilisation. This topi drama has lead to the common Pakistani Pakhtoon hating all Afghans, we want the 4 million refugees returned and you want us to have no borders.

  • @jahidhosssin54456
    @jahidhosssin54456 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Britishers draw this line

  • @lovely-iu4xx
    @lovely-iu4xx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Duran line was never accepted or will b accepted by Afghanistan either by a democratic government or by taliban.........

  • @sumeetbhosle7627
    @sumeetbhosle7627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hahaha...Pakistan always supported terrorism and Mujahideen in Afghanistan..Pakistani army is responsible for causing
    instability... Pashtuns will never forget.. Better give back NWFP areas to real Afghans.

    • @zeykhan5895
      @zeykhan5895 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh just shut up ,pashtuns dont need u to talk about them

  • @rickkhan1093
    @rickkhan1093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    For your kind information, Pakistan never got independence. India was split/divided into TWO parts. The other part became Pakistan. Ambassador Durrani needs to be educated on this issue.

    • @MEGALecture
      @MEGALecture 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      if i were you i might get my brain cells checked.

    • @amolkhobaragade
      @amolkhobaragade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MEGALecture He is right. India got independence and Pakistan was created in August 1947.
      Pakistan never existed before that.

    • @AJ-I
      @AJ-I 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@amolkhobaragade How come Pakistan came into being a day before India ?

    • @globalcitizen1856
      @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, India got divided into 3 parts

    • @Dankseid-o1u
      @Dankseid-o1u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AJ-I Pakistan came into being a day before India became a Republic, India always existed before pakistan.

  • @sanjoydutta2584
    @sanjoydutta2584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir Pakistan got independence or India got parition.which is correct.Is Pakistan is a partition part of India .If this is true then no question of independence.It was partioned.

    • @SajidKhan-yw3jc
      @SajidKhan-yw3jc ปีที่แล้ว

      So you are telling me that India existed before 47.

  • @ajmalsahak7784
    @ajmalsahak7784 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We Afghans will never accept the Durand line cuz this line was between Afghanistan and British India not Pakistan and there is nothing in common between the Pashtuns and Punjabi people also if Pakistan believe in Islam than they shouldn’t divide brothers which the British did if Pakistan don’t agree than there is no difference between Pakistan and British this means Pakistan is also a colonizer like British which opens the page that we must declare Jihad against Pakistan.

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pakistan was created as a hat-red tool against India. They never wanted India to prosper that’s why they created Pakistan

  • @danialhussain8795
    @danialhussain8795 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfectly put forward

    • @omarshinwari7823
      @omarshinwari7823 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He missed a lot of issue.

    • @harris7963
      @harris7963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      perfectly ignorant that this border is not real for the Pashtuns

  • @omarshinwari7823
    @omarshinwari7823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ignore this video. Im from the durrand lone area
    what this person hasnt mention wad that the durrand lines divides us Pashtuns into 2 country. Afghanisfan anf pakistan
    dividing families and tribes. To this day no Pashtun from both side even see the durrand line. Many ignore it
    He nentioned that "afghans call it durrand line and Pakistan call its an international border". This isnt true us Pakistani Pashtuns dont see it as "international"
    My pashtun tribe: the shinwaris are literally divided by it

    • @mrexpress8002
      @mrexpress8002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am punjabi but first we are Pakistani. If afghanistan wants to be part of a greater Pakistan the border can be removed otherwise if the afghans want to be a separate country then the fence should stay. Also the 2 million refugees can go back to afghanistan too. what do afghans want?

    • @omarshinwari7823
      @omarshinwari7823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@mrexpress8002 Your a punjabi. Yiu shouldnt be imvolved in Pashtun issues
      worry about your own india Pak punjab border Although yours id diffrent since punjabis have a diffrent religions
      Pashtun border aka durrand line is diffrent as we come from the same tribe. Have the same religon language and culture and no we rather have independance than become part of another nation..We KPK pashtun did not want to be a part of pak or india or afg

    • @mrexpress8002
      @mrexpress8002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@omarshinwari7823 you are living in dreamland dude. I am punjabi and i get involved in everyones issues but first of all i am a Pakistani. Pakistani Punjabis are muslim you idiot! the problem with you is that you live in the past and are stuck in backward thinking. My grandfathers fought for independence and my uncles fought against the soviet union when they invaded afghanistan. Let me tell you something son we will never surrender on the sovereignty of Pakistan. Also many many pashtuns have married punjabis. you are an afghan go back to afghanistan dude.

    • @omarshinwari7823
      @omarshinwari7823 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrexpress8002 Your a nationalists
      alsp who said punjabis are not muslums. thefe muslim. hindus and sikh punjanis
      Punjabis have no rights getting involved in Pashtun affairs. thats like an english man getting involved in arab affairs
      go worry about your own pak india punjab border
      Im a pashtun from Landi kotal shinwari tribe in KPK
      Also we pashtuns dont marry outside our tribes so idk what your talking about

    • @omarshinwari7823
      @omarshinwari7823 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrexpress8002 Whos an afghan here. 😂😂😂
      im from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and native
      for us pashtuns beinf muslims and pashtun is first. and nationality (pakistani) is second
      also no pak or afghan pashtun accepts durrand line
      like i said worrt about your own border in India/pak punjab instead of gettinf involeved in ours 😂😂

  • @qa7103
    @qa7103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A nice recap of all the things we learned in class one

  • @Ddireland
    @Ddireland 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imaginary line to keep one nation apart

  • @factomatics3956
    @factomatics3956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good Job TCM!!
    Well explained

  • @HassanAli-fj2dr
    @HassanAli-fj2dr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Peace fence should be completed at any cost

    • @Munjya_Jinn
      @Munjya_Jinn ปีที่แล้ว

      What peace fence? its a bloody fence

  • @shuaybx1811
    @shuaybx1811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Strange issue, so the King of Afghanistan gave away a massive portion of Afghanistan without consulting Afghans. Who agreed on this shabby deal? And where is the original agreement. Was it in Farsi or Pashto or English?

    • @shuaybx1811
      @shuaybx1811 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would be nice to know if it was an actual border or buffer zone.

    • @manzar2
      @manzar2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shuaybx1811 Bhai buffer zone tou Karachi mai hai kia hogga

    • @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy
      @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is lying, Durand Line has never ever been accepted as an international border and the 1921 treaty of Rawalpindi has cancelled all the previous treaties including the Durand treaty, and the 1921 treaty is a temporary arrangement which could not be cancelled for the first three years and after three years both party can at any time unilaterally cancel the treaty with 12 months binding periode, and the agreement of 1930 is a reconfirmation of the treaty of 1921 and nothing new addition. in 1949 Afghanistan has cancelled the treaty and it has no legal basis whatsoever. this is the text of the as per article below of the treaty of 1921.
      Article XIV
      The provisions of this treaty shall come into force from the date of its signature, and
      shall remain in force for three years from that date. In case neither of the High
      Contracting Parties should have notified, twelve months before the expiration of the
      said three years, the intention to terminate it, it shall remain binding until the
      expiration of one year from the day on which either of the High Contracting Parties
      shall have denounced it. This treaty shall come into force after the signatures of the
      Missions of the two Parties, and the two ratified copies of this shall be exchanged in
      Kabul within 2⅟2 months after the signatures.

  • @saadnazir7536
    @saadnazir7536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Set playback speed to 1.25x.
    Thank me later.

    • @manzar2
      @manzar2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did it, still it was slow, then I set it 1.75 x mager phir bhi isnay boht time zaya kia, boht footage Khai isnay

  • @xoxgamerzzz4358
    @xoxgamerzzz4358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's much difficulties for people to meet their tribes.

  • @jonnykhan1411
    @jonnykhan1411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its kind of absurd. First of All ,what they have,they can't manage it. People migrated to different countries like Pakistan UAE Australia and Europe. They want to acquire more dude first be a nation. Always scattered ,polarized community and divided among war lords with certain ethnicity.

    • @harris7963
      @harris7963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This so-called border shouldn't have been drawn in the first place. Expect more conflicts in the future.

  • @balokhail
    @balokhail 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well I did understand in English but it should be in URDU dubbing so everyone could exactly know in this video

  • @engr.ishratgul2617
    @engr.ishratgul2617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plz don't add those awful disturbing background music

  • @riffatwaniofficial9810
    @riffatwaniofficial9810 ปีที่แล้ว

    in the agrement the word Subsidy is written

  • @syednadir818
    @syednadir818 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Durrani sahib 👍

  • @JunedHussain
    @JunedHussain หลายเดือนก่อน

    Poor knowledge: Zahir shah + daud tried their best destroyed peace, and on several occasions, attacked 😢pakistan

  • @syedagha9966
    @syedagha9966 ปีที่แล้ว

    Durand line was signed in 1893 unpto wehn??

  • @esakhan1726
    @esakhan1726 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Real information

  • @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy
    @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please dont lie, Durand Line has never ever been accepted as an international border and the 1921 treaty of Rawalpindi has cancelled all the previous treaties including the Durand treaty, and the 1921 treaty is a temporary arrangement which could not be cancelled for the first three years and after three years both party can at any time unilaterally cancel the treaty with 12 months binding periode, and the agreement of 1930 is a reconfirmation of the treaty of 1921 and nothing new addition. in 1949 Afghanistan has cancelled the treaty and it has no legal basis whatsoever. this is the text of the as per article below of the treaty of 1921.
    Article XIV
    The provisions of this treaty shall come into force from the date of its signature, and
    shall remain in force for three years from that date. In case neither of the High
    Contracting Parties should have notified, twelve months before the expiration of the
    said three years, the intention to terminate it, it shall remain binding until the
    expiration of one year from the day on which either of the High Contracting Parties
    shall have denounced it. This treaty shall come into force after the signatures of the
    Missions of the two Parties, and the two ratified copies of this shall be exchanged in
    Kabul within 2⅟2 months after the signatures.

  • @salamsyed486
    @salamsyed486 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I m from Swat and I don’t recognize Duran line..
    Your Masters are gone so all the agreements.. end of story
    Although Pak still in the delusion of being Brown Angrez., time is up

  • @SR-te2db
    @SR-te2db 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The great lie starts at 3:20 -- there is no formal legality of which he speaks, and he fails to mention what the actual disagreement is and why there is disagreement to begin with. This is how they avoid speaking openly and honestly. If Pakistan was truly a nation of muslims with good intentions, the dialogue wouldn't continue in this manner -- everyone knows the fence has nothing to do with narcotics or terrorists (they literally trained the Taliban in Pakistan to then go back to Afghanistan after the US pulled out). This type of two-faced rhetoric simply adds to the same issues of character & credibility of Pakistan on the global stage.

    • @Rehan-xs2ej
      @Rehan-xs2ej 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      rhetoric cries and always blame Pakistan we r here till doomsday do whatever you can as durrani the ones who founded afghanistan he is proud to be a Pakistani .

    • @baghi536
      @baghi536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you care to highlight what the actual disagreement is?

    • @Rehan-xs2ej
      @Rehan-xs2ej 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@baghi536 afghanis being afghani is the actual issue the assholeness is just too much to bear .

    • @acrobat6217
      @acrobat6217 ปีที่แล้ว

      You hindoo?

    • @Mu5tyLaghmani
      @Mu5tyLaghmani ปีที่แล้ว

      The lie starts when he says it is demarcated inch by inch😂😂😂, first of all Kaalia poomjabakai slave, the Durrand line runs through such a rough difficult terrain that, it was never formally demarcated, as early as 2018 was when the US paid $400 million to Pakistan to demarcate the line based on alliance of Pakistan in the invasion of Afghanistan by US and Pakistan.
      The agreement was signed in English and later it was marked based on valley and mountains not by inches as this hypocrite Asad fake Durrani claims.
      To this day Pakistan hasn't provided the agreement nor the documentation of demarcation, it is purely taken away by force just like Israel has taken over Palestine 🇵🇸.
      There was no agreement with Pakistan and nor was there any self determination rights given to the people of Pakhtunkhwa.

  • @tausifkam3981
    @tausifkam3981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best Vedio Sir.In English it seems to be more intresting n Understandable..

  • @ertugrul1867
    @ertugrul1867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OH PUnjABEEE

  • @SJ_new
    @SJ_new 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pakistan got independence lol as if it existed before, the correct line would have been pakistan got created, wonder how many other biased word plays are in this video

    • @naim_sulaimankhel
      @naim_sulaimankhel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is true actually. It was formation, not independence. In fact, Pakistan has high ethnic tension between each other because of this

    • @SJ_new
      @SJ_new ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aurangzeb1618 orange pocket is Sheikh Chilli and Bro even Pakistan name did not existed before british let alone civilization.

    • @SJ_new
      @SJ_new ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zyT175 India was already there from centuries , only benstoke pakistan got born ... even the Columbus found US looking for India .

    • @SJ_new
      @SJ_new ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zyT175 by your logic there was no country ever existed all were regions ... grow out of this mindset ... do something productive instead of word plays

    • @SJ_new
      @SJ_new ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zyT175 the problem with you is you are blind in monsoon all you see is green ... Keyboard warrior history expert . Go do some productive work with you cloudy region textbook

  • @amazingamx1255
    @amazingamx1255 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very biased

  • @araz7857
    @araz7857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dukhtar farosh and bachabaz afghani.

  • @tausifkam3981
    @tausifkam3981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    TCM abrevation of ?? U an army Senior Sir?

  • @truckihuzztr5049
    @truckihuzztr5049 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ended the video After one minute. Dont want to have this topic explained by a Pajeet with pajeet accent lol

  • @wahz_amd
    @wahz_amd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was so boring that I fell asleep after 2
    Minutes. Just speak in Urdu please, there are English subtitles. Ap se English boli nahin ja rahi Janab.

  • @riffatwaniofficial9810
    @riffatwaniofficial9810 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let me correct some facts which is missing in this video. it was not only one aggrement but four. e.g 1879,1893, 1901, and 1919. Afghanistan has no offical claim on KP anywhere. the bitish given subsidy far before the durand line. the subsidy started in 1879 during the Gandamak treaty.

    • @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy
      @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please dont lie, Durand Line has never ever been accepted as an international border and the 1921 treaty of Rawalpindi has cancelled all the previous treaties including the Durand treaty, and the 1921 treaty is a temporary arrangement which could not be cancelled for the first three years and after three years both party can at any time unilaterally cancel the treaty with 12 months binding periode, and the agreement of 1930 is a reconfirmation of the treaty of 1921 and nothing new addition. in 1949 Afghanistan has cancelled the treaty and it has no legal basis whatsoever. this is the text of the as per article below of the treaty of 1921.
      Article XIV
      The provisions of this treaty shall come into force from the date of its signature, and
      shall remain in force for three years from that date. In case neither of the High
      Contracting Parties should have notified, twelve months before the expiration of the
      said three years, the intention to terminate it, it shall remain binding until the
      expiration of one year from the day on which either of the High Contracting Parties
      shall have denounced it. This treaty shall come into force after the signatures of the
      Missions of the two Parties, and the two ratified copies of this shall be exchanged in
      Kabul within 2⅟2 months after the signatures.

    • @riffatwaniofficial9810
      @riffatwaniofficial9810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 1921 agreement is the not the Durand line agreement but the extension of 1919 Rawalpindi agreement. Afghanistan has never denounced the 1921 agreement till 1947.

    • @riffatwaniofficial9810
      @riffatwaniofficial9810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Durand line is a dead horse. it's an international border but more interestingly Afghanistan has no official claim on KPK. KPK is part of Pakistan and Pashtuns are proud Pakistani

    • @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy
      @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@riffatwaniofficial9810 The treaty of Kabul in 1921 is signed because both sides could not come to an agreement on the Durand line and is therefore made an temporary arrangement, which gives both sides the right to cancel the treaty unilaterally at any time, and Afghanistan has used that right to cancel the treaty in 1947, before the establishment of a new neocolonial state named Pakistan for the loyal servants of the British empire as a extra buffer as part of the broader security politics of the leaving British empire against the Communist USSR.

    • @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy
      @EsmatLaarawai-mo8oy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@riffatwaniofficial9810 It is up to people of both sides of Durand line and Afghanistan to decide thier future, and Afghanistan has never ever recognized the line of Hatred drawn by colonial power, so that is the most important thing is, the opinion of colonial powers around the world and the opinion of Punjabi Establishment in GHQ and the opinion of states that has no affinity with the issue doesnt matter at all.

  • @miaad84
    @miaad84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    British have no business in drawing lines and thereby creating everlasting disputes outside its own geographical borders and by that I mean the British Isle.
    Chinese has as much claim to reject McMahon line and reclaim Laddakh, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh. Same way Afghans have no need to accept Durand Line, that seperates it from it's rightful brother province of KPK. Pakistani pashtuns must realize that it is in their best interest to join fellow Pashtuns than remain second class citizens to Punjabi who reep all the benefits. Bengalis proved it by setting themselves free from oppressive Mullah and Martial Law, establishing their own nation and results speak for themselves. Long live valiant Pashtuns who once ruled over these Punjabis.

    • @amolkhobaragade
      @amolkhobaragade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ladakh, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh wants to be with India.
      British did had business dividing border as they were the rulers. It's upto you to negotiate.

    • @amolkhobaragade
      @amolkhobaragade 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @unknown soldiier You can leave for Afghanistan anyday.

    • @miaad84
      @miaad84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @unknown soldiier Soon brother, these lands will go to where they belong and nations will be reunited.

    • @miaad84
      @miaad84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amolkhobaragade the territories of dispute will be taken back by China and India will do nothing, just as they watched with utter humiliation China taking back Pangong Tso, where they are building bridges, as well as villages in Arunachal Pradesh.

    • @globalcitizen1856
      @globalcitizen1856 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But there is a difference. Forget about Indian territories, even Tibet was never part of China till 1950! Neither Tibetans nor Indians ever call themselves Chinese. Whereas Pashtuns never accepted they are Pakistanis. Like China occupied Tibet and other surrounding areas, Pakistanis occupied KP, Balochistan, and Kashmir. Both of these countries are rouge countries always looking to create trouble for others

  • @KhanKing-ds5rm
    @KhanKing-ds5rm ปีที่แล้ว

    Me durand line me rshta hon hamary adh se zith reshta dar khost me hain zakheil

  • @ihsanbajwa3974
    @ihsanbajwa3974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    افعانستان نے ڈیورنڈ لائن معاہدہ 1893 میں میر عبدالرحمن کی بادشاہت کے دوران طے کیا تھا۔۔۔کیا یہ معلومات درست ہیں؟؟؟

    • @freeminder347
      @freeminder347 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For 100 years

    • @muhammadusama6040
      @muhammadusama6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@freeminder347 Where is it written that agreement was for 100 years ? Please show

    • @usmanmohmand9643
      @usmanmohmand9643 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      دالخور لنگمار کی نسل اپنے کام سے کام

  • @ZaferKhanAlpha
    @ZaferKhanAlpha 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awful explainer

  • @huzaifakhan7204
    @huzaifakhan7204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Divide and Rule is the new colonial policy.

  • @zamaryshaker6650
    @zamaryshaker6650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Durand Line Forced Agreement, one part of Afghanistan was leased for 100 years, the lease has been expired long ago 30 years, the Afghan Government has fully right to take his land and take the lease for 30 years with full penalty form the successor government of Pakistan.

    • @zainqazi9502
      @zainqazi9502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But first they have to take govt from talibans
      Hahahah wake-up from day dreaming

    • @mrexpress8002
      @mrexpress8002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zamary shaker if afghans accept a greater Pakistan then Kabul can be the 5 biggest city in Pakistan.

    • @Aceo_0
      @Aceo_0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mrexpress8002 you should take permission from your Chinese masters then we will talk.

  • @azamkhanbabar
    @azamkhanbabar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    abayy Qomii zoban urdu ha or tuu to english ma . chalo khairr agli bar urdu ma koshish karo

  • @SOWProgramming
    @SOWProgramming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pakistan ka koi border b natural nh h.
    Punjab ki b to division ki gai thi so hzm kren.

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same with India. Sirf Punjab hi nahi balki Bengal ko bhi divide kiya gaya tha

    • @SOWProgramming
      @SOWProgramming ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dipanjanmahapatra5258
      Dono desh e ajeeb hain.
      Insaano ki tarah rhen to kya hi bat h.
      Pta nh kb peace prevail hoga

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SOWProgramming thanks to Angrez. Yaha hamlogo ko divide karke khud socha tha ki duniya mein hukumat karega lekin aaj hamlog hi unke sar ke upar baithe huye hai

    • @SOWProgramming
      @SOWProgramming ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dipanjanmahapatra5258 no doubt

    • @dipanjanmahapatra5258
      @dipanjanmahapatra5258 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SOWProgramming seriously I wanted to say to my Indian subcontinent brothers and sisters. Do jihad against these goras

  • @imdgamer3130
    @imdgamer3130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The durand line was for lease for 100 years and and pakistan was supposed to pay 20 million afghani yearly like rent and a package such as weapons horses and etc and they never paid that. The lease ended long time ago and the land is supposed to be given back to Afghanistan. If pakistan wants the land they have to pay trillions of dollar to Afghanistan for the land which they never did.

    • @zainqazi9502
      @zainqazi9502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well its a blatant lie that agreement is for 100 years
      If you read original agreement there’s no such thing written in it
      So stop the sale pitch because no one’s gonna buy it

    • @mrexpress8002
      @mrexpress8002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @IMD GAMER I AM AFRAID UNLESSS YOU ACCEPT A GREATER PAKISTAN THEN THE BORDER REMAINS. KABUL CAN BE THE 5TH BIGGEST CITY IN PAKISTAN.

  • @King-Nova
    @King-Nova ปีที่แล้ว

    Pork

  • @Randomfunny_47
    @Randomfunny_47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fencing durand line means dividing afghani and pakistani pakhtuns i am from Orakzai tribe and i am against durand fence bcoz actually every pakhun is afghan
    زه دا حيران يم چي پاكستان دشمني إنڈیا سرہ دی خو ليكن بند كوي دي افغانستان بورڈر۔ دا ولی ؟
    زندہ باد یو پختون

    • @muhammadusama6040
      @muhammadusama6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you give guarantee that there will be no terrorists coming to PAK from AFG? Would you take responsibility if illegal Afghans do criminal stuff in our cities?

    • @Randomfunny_47
      @Randomfunny_47 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadusama6040 why don’t they fence indian side border. coz they claim india is their worst enemy but with them they are sharing sweets on a good days here on afghan side they are fencing borders that’s really sad and disappointing. coz they don’t have any right to do it. bcoz they didn’t conquered our pakhtun tribal areas they didn’t conquered us. so we will decide for this land. what we want should happen not what they want

    • @Randomfunny_47
      @Randomfunny_47 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadusama6040 don’t worry too much about our side. coz when their was drone strikes on our areas at that time where was these people to take stance. when we was being killed by us drone strikes where was our savior napak army. where was our government. where was our just name brother punjab. we don’t have any threat from afghan side don’t worry son too much about us.

    • @muhammadusama6040
      @muhammadusama6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Randomfunny_47 dude, each and every inch of indian border along with LOC is fenced and guarded. Please verify your knowledge

    • @Randomfunny_47
      @Randomfunny_47 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadusama6040 what about kartar pur

  • @ertugrul1867
    @ertugrul1867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    DURAND LINE kuf r

    • @mrexpress8002
      @mrexpress8002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      PAKISTAN ZINDABAD!

    • @AKJ-Editz
      @AKJ-Editz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mrexpress8002
      Pakistan Murdabad

  • @SJ_new
    @SJ_new ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pakistan got independence lol as if it existed before, the correct line would have been pakistan got created, wonder how many other biased word plays are in this video