Concerning the HEVT -THE RDF/HSTV-L has 4 times the explosive filler compared to the 2S38 which is a massive difference as the 57mm takes quite a few shells to bring down a target due to the TNT Equivalent to Proximity fuse radius. The 75mm HEVT you can comfortably use a mark 1 eyeball to accurately hit the enemy....whilst the 57mm needs the IRST for all engagements
Ngl Gaijin should really do something about thermal generation differences both at top tier and ~9.3. It’s just wild that some nations get third gen thermals from the start when others still have first gen thermals at 12.0.
@@RobinVanderLinden-mf3fu ah, yes they are well known to ignore documentation as well. Just ask Spookston. They just make some tech trees stronger than others for whatever reason.
@@Iden_in_the_RainThat's what BRs are for in the first place. If the vehicle's performance at the BR is bad because of thermals for example they should lower it. Keep in mind though, not every tank is equally as good in every role.
@@hagridflower2907 thermals don’t really effect BR much at all (if they did, you wouldn’t be seeing the BMD-4M or other Russian IFVs at 9.3 where most other IFVs/lights have first gen thermals), and past ~11.0 first gen thermals are unacceptable
The us really suffers in ground forces
youre the only war thunder channel i actually enjoy watching
Concerning the HEVT -THE RDF/HSTV-L has 4 times the explosive filler compared to the 2S38 which is a massive difference as the 57mm takes quite a few shells to bring down a target due to the TNT Equivalent to Proximity fuse radius. The 75mm HEVT you can comfortably use a mark 1 eyeball to accurately hit the enemy....whilst the 57mm needs the IRST for all engagements
Too bad fire rate is more important
Bruh 2 shots from 2s38 already do the job. And it’s fire rate is higher
1:33 „Hit“
@tobi2233 agreed, a 0.9s firerate is quite anemic for SPAA duties
And lets get real, it's hardly been a picnic for US players up this point in the tree.
hot doggo
HOT DAWGZ
game just needs a mod that allows u to improve thermal resolution
Hot Dogs
Hey chako, where u been
Ngl Gaijin should really do something about thermal generation differences both at top tier and ~9.3. It’s just wild that some nations get third gen thermals from the start when others still have first gen thermals at 12.0.
They dont chose the generation, if its documented that it has 1st gen, it will get that ingame
@@RobinVanderLinden-mf3fu I get that, but there should be some sort of thermals upgrade to at least second generation.
@@RobinVanderLinden-mf3fu ah, yes they are well known to ignore documentation as well. Just ask Spookston.
They just make some tech trees stronger than others for whatever reason.
@@Iden_in_the_RainThat's what BRs are for in the first place. If the vehicle's performance at the BR is bad because of thermals for example they should lower it. Keep in mind though, not every tank is equally as good in every role.
@@hagridflower2907 thermals don’t really effect BR much at all (if they did, you wouldn’t be seeing the BMD-4M or other Russian IFVs at 9.3 where most other IFVs/lights have first gen thermals), and past ~11.0 first gen thermals are unacceptable
Lets be real here, all the USA wallet warriors already bought this thing 😂