There's a good reason why we have started to phase out the Ultimax 100 SAW im the SAF😂 . In fact I have never seen beyond Ultimax 100 Gen 3. The most we toyed around is up to Gen 2 or 3 for most of us and learned it and used it for more than a decade of our adult lives. Seen melted Ultimax barrels after pushing a couplr of mag dumps, multiple feed jams on live ammunitions which locked up the entire bolt carrier group and thus rendering the charging handle inoperable to fix the jam...can't even eject out the magazine with unused ammunition inside during the multiple feed jam. Had to resort to a dangerous tactic of removing the butt stock to access the internals while a jammed magazine with 3/4 full mag and a jammed bolt carrier group which can fire off on full auto at any moment. Managed to fully extract the problematic bolt carrier group, live ammunition filled mags, remove the jam and not have the wepaon fire off a single round... On top of that the issued happened during squad live fires training for squad level leap frogging movement. Imagine if that jammed Ultimax were to had a discharge in full auto, the kind of friendly fire incident it could happen and the casualties it can create in a peace time training. The cheaply stamped AR-15 mags and stamped Ultimax weapon body creates a lot of quality issues to be desired. A lot of the home brewed vehicles like the Bionix 1 & 2 were paper APCs in the sense they dent and damage very easily. Just a small bump into a medium tree or concrete barrier is all you need to make a dent. Not so enthusiastic about these vehicles. The supposed air-tight NBRC protection with air-tight seals doesn't last and whenever it rains and we lower the hatches, water can still seep in... and the vehicles were just maintained a while ago. Essentially, didn't had good experiences using them.
He talk in a very arrogant stance, it does not show welcoming sign for customer . It also does not show the pride of the people behind all these . Only there to sell like a robot. Probably , another parachute officer into position.
Anti-drone is a must on every armor equipment. Wonder why no one has yet to produce small unit anti-aerial drone missile systems, man portable with missiles as small as say 30cm long with limited propellant, after all it need not go beyond engaging drone at 300m.
Military ships, planes, and vehicles that cannot counter drones are ineffective. Drones will dominate the sky, sea, and land, rendering even commandos obsolete. The SAF urgently needs to completely revamp its defense strategies. Otherwise, the top echelon must be removed for jeopardizing our safety.
Generally I don’t think it makes the biggest difference for military use. I’ve seen several armies have both side drive or even central steering in their inventory.
My qustion is will all these be effective during war it may be effective for NS man to train but when real war happen can It protect the people inside the Troop carrier now we got new fighting welfare like FPV drones,new tanks,mines, all these things are new fighting welfare in Ukraine war that now we can learn from if the infantry carrier have new protective system to FPV drones and mines
US approves $3.2 Mn deal with Singapore for 1885 Colt Infantry Automatic Rifles. According to David Boey on September 12, 2023, Singapore got the US approval to buy 1,885 Colt 5.56mm caliber fully automatic rifles for $3,189,420. Does this made our owned manufactured weapons OBSOLETE? Talk until so BIG in your interview how good ST Engrg !!
Nah .. the difference are armor personnel carrier APC , provides rapid transporting light infantry into war zone or flanking the enemy with its shed spread abilities but it’s thinner armor mades it venerable to heavy shelling even 7.76mm shells , however it’s lighter armor allows it to be transport with C130 and deploy to anywhere when required. Where infantry fighting vehicles IFV have better armor but slower speed is good for providing support fire power and pick up and off load fighting forces in the middle of battle field or taxi service and supporting the MBT is another important task for IFV too .
Hunter are not meant to replace terrex.. they're different vehicles used by different units. Hunters are used by Armoured Infantry, whereas Terrex are used by Motorised Infantry.
ST need to have a VANGUARD force of AUTONOMOUS with REMOTE control. The 3 divisions and 2 reserve division. And the 20 division conscript reservist units. Study the UA-RUSSIAN war. Tanks, IFV, APC, artillery, Howitzer, ECM vehicles, MLRS, drones, robots in 6th generation format. Ammunition, 155mm, 255mm, Vacumn bombs 250kg, 500kg, 1000kg, glide bombs, missiles, countermeasures. 😂❤
@@tansehleng371 what do you know about Malaysia products, what do you know about what Malaysia produce. Malaysia can produce good car nowadays for 1 example and much more, what does singapore produce? I know, produce shallow and redundant people like you, only think spore is world class. Malaysia dont produce military tanks, so why compare? Reason is you know singapore cant even hold a candle to any nation that produce military products!
Vehicles look Trash Decent Spokesman Meaningless Advertisement Not enough Doctrine Talk Too much Oversimplified Cheap Comfort Propaganda Drop Real Stats, Comparisons and Display’s or else You’re not even Trying Bronco’s already Been Proven Good though despite Them not even Trying to Sell It
ST has secured a USD74 mil order for 155 & 40mm arty ammo from european customers. No doubts on where these are headed to.
Ikr
Where?
@@ellusion1985ukronautzi land
Ukr
For tilling and creating organic matter to ameliorate the Ukrainian soil.
Brand Singapore....Trusted Globally as usual.
Better than china weapon 😅
@@peacenowar6920 - will China steal the design again ? Terrex in Hong Kong
@@peacenowar6920yaa that the thing with the fact that singapore is small af and still does better than china😅😂
background music is too loud
There's a good reason why we have started to phase out the Ultimax 100 SAW im the SAF😂 .
In fact I have never seen beyond Ultimax 100 Gen 3. The most we toyed around is up to Gen 2 or 3 for most of us and learned it and used it for more than a decade of our adult lives. Seen melted Ultimax barrels after pushing a couplr of mag dumps, multiple feed jams on live ammunitions which locked up the entire bolt carrier group and thus rendering the charging handle inoperable to fix the jam...can't even eject out the magazine with unused ammunition inside during the multiple feed jam. Had to resort to a dangerous tactic of removing the butt stock to access the internals while a jammed magazine with 3/4 full mag and a jammed bolt carrier group which can fire off on full auto at any moment. Managed to fully extract the problematic bolt carrier group, live ammunition filled mags, remove the jam and not have the wepaon fire off a single round... On top of that the issued happened during squad live fires training for squad level leap frogging movement. Imagine if that jammed Ultimax were to had a discharge in full auto, the kind of friendly fire incident it could happen and the casualties it can create in a peace time training. The cheaply stamped AR-15 mags and stamped Ultimax weapon body creates a lot of quality issues to be desired. A lot of the home brewed vehicles like the Bionix 1 & 2 were paper APCs in the sense they dent and damage very easily. Just a small bump into a medium tree or concrete barrier is all you need to make a dent. Not so enthusiastic about these vehicles. The supposed air-tight NBRC protection with air-tight seals doesn't last and whenever it rains and we lower the hatches, water can still seep in... and the vehicles were just maintained a while ago. Essentially, didn't had good experiences using them.
good point. that is the reason no one were buying. Need to send it to battlefields. FOC and work on refinement
Done good Singapore 🇸🇬
He can have sweet talk.the engineering and technician work like hell to compete the meet from the customer.
He talk in a very arrogant stance, it does not show welcoming sign for customer . It also does not show the pride of the people behind all these . Only there to sell like a robot. Probably , another parachute officer into position.
@@HL88888 will China steal the design again ? Terrex in Hong Kong
This guy explains better than most of the western counterparts
Chua Jin Kiat! Eagles 😂
You say that like might not be able to. English is his first language.
Anti-drone is a must on every armor equipment. Wonder why no one has yet to produce small unit anti-aerial drone missile systems, man portable with missiles as small as say 30cm long with limited propellant, after all it need not go beyond engaging drone at 300m.
Its a new and developing threat and its much more complex n will take stime to develope a full proof system. All parties are racing in this direction
Terrex S5 & Bronco don't seem to have any defense against drones attacks.
probably design for urban warfare
As long as that's no component from CCP PRC Chee-na, it's good 👍
Or Made In India
will China steal the design again ? Terrex in Hong Kong
Singapore Tony stark
lol is tht a joke? lol. Tony in the comics is a genius and inventor, among other things.
Where is the anti drone capability?
Exactly... elephant in the room question.
Time for you to make 1 and make a few quick million dollars a year😂
Good questions !
They must be expecting the drones to bounce off the armour.
In any sales talks I only believed them 10%
majulah Singapore .
Military ships, planes, and vehicles that cannot counter drones are ineffective. Drones will dominate the sky, sea, and land, rendering even commandos obsolete. The SAF urgently needs to completely revamp its defense strategies. Otherwise, the top echelon must be removed for jeopardizing our safety.
saf spent 0.9 billion for "safti city". They definitely didnt get their priorities right.
Just remember don't ship near china.
I am so lost then what if it face light tanks? And drones?? Wouldn't the ifv be destroy very easily?
As a Terrex Operator myself unfortunately I won't get to drive this...hope future operators get to enjoy this!
Singapore has left side traffic, so I expected that the Terrex S5 would have right side steering.
Generally I don’t think it makes the biggest difference for military use. I’ve seen several armies have both side drive or even central steering in their inventory.
@@deanwood1338 You're right. German and Dutch Boxer IFV has right hand drive while Germany and the Netherlands have right hand traffic.
Weird camera angle, making him talking to invisible man at the end
Do you have an anti drone system for NATO?
👍🙏
Merlion mighty 🙏🙂 Peter 60 saya
My qustion is will all these be effective during war it may be effective for NS man to train but when real war happen can It protect the people inside the
Troop carrier now we got new fighting welfare like FPV drones,new tanks,mines, all these things are new fighting welfare in Ukraine war that now we can learn from if the infantry carrier have new protective system to FPV drones and mines
US approves $3.2 Mn deal with Singapore for 1885 Colt Infantry Automatic Rifles. According to David Boey on September 12, 2023, Singapore got the US approval to buy 1,885 Colt 5.56mm caliber fully automatic rifles for $3,189,420.
Does this made our owned manufactured weapons OBSOLETE? Talk until so BIG in your interview how good ST Engrg !!
O_o 1880 rifles? It's To replace our old model ultimax.... we use the SR-21 for rifles
Singapore not even listed among top 12 arms exporter globally.
If it's in the top 30, that would is impressive for its size.
Why want to publicise that she is one of the world’s top supplier of weapons and munition.
Please remember how small Singapore is compared to any country in the world.
who ah
I thought Terrex series is already take over by the hunter series? Why going backwards to develop the old series ?
Terrex is APC, an armoured taxi. Hunter is IFV, supports the MBT.
Your thought is wrong. The future Terrex series may be the command variant. Bionix AFV series is take over by the Hunter IFV series.
Nah .. the difference are armor personnel carrier APC , provides rapid transporting light infantry into war zone or flanking the enemy with its shed spread abilities but it’s thinner armor mades it venerable to heavy shelling even 7.76mm shells , however it’s lighter armor allows it to be transport with C130 and deploy to anywhere when required.
Where infantry fighting vehicles IFV have better armor but slower speed is good for providing support fire power and pick up and off load fighting forces in the middle of battle field or taxi service and supporting the MBT is another important task for IFV too .
@@philipchan79 No. All vehicles can be modified for different purposes, depending on the situations required. So, no fixed variant is made.
Hunter are not meant to replace terrex.. they're different vehicles used by different units. Hunters are used by Armoured Infantry, whereas Terrex are used by Motorised Infantry.
ST need to have a VANGUARD force of AUTONOMOUS with REMOTE control. The 3 divisions and 2 reserve division. And the 20 division conscript reservist units.
Study the UA-RUSSIAN war.
Tanks, IFV, APC, artillery, Howitzer, ECM vehicles, MLRS, drones, robots in 6th generation format.
Ammunition, 155mm, 255mm, Vacumn bombs 250kg, 500kg, 1000kg, glide bombs, missiles, countermeasures.
😂❤
This part of the world u meant Asia? Not many rich countries leh haha.
C'mon, they're in Europe for Eurosatory, a defence convention.....
will China steal the design again ? Terrex in Hong Kong
No one is buying. send a brigade worth to Ukraine and get some credibility. or buy loads of old bradleys and modify it like we did with the tanks
Building weapon in homeland,,ohh..even tiny red dot heading no peace future
Whoever bought singapore made products will 100% regret it. Singapore made products basically stupid designs, not useable. Total flop
At least it's better than Malaysia.😂
@@tansehleng371 what do you know about Malaysia products, what do you know about what Malaysia produce. Malaysia can produce good car nowadays for 1 example and much more, what does singapore produce? I know, produce shallow and redundant people like you, only think spore is world class.
Malaysia dont produce military tanks, so why compare? Reason is you know singapore cant even hold a candle to any nation that produce military products!
Vehicles look Trash
Decent Spokesman
Meaningless Advertisement
Not enough Doctrine Talk
Too much Oversimplified Cheap Comfort Propaganda
Drop Real Stats, Comparisons and Display’s or else You’re not even Trying
Bronco’s already Been Proven Good though despite Them not even Trying to Sell It
its a useless junk dude
🎉🎉🎉
No battery how?
carry generator hahaha
SHOTA 🇦🇱
Singapore has agreed rejoin China by 2050
MCGA