This is seriously amazing. But yes, if you have never seen code before, you would have no clue how to ask the questions you did in order to get ChatGPT to fix the errors, let alone where to insert those fixes.
I started using it with just bare ideas of what I wanted to accomplish and no idea of coding, and let me tell you GPT4 gets things done. First day I had no clue of what it was doing and had to ask for every single change and some mistakes were made. Second day I started prompting better to get better results. A week in and I have a basic understanding of how python code is organized, how functions and conditions work and how to use APIs. But most importantly, with GPT 4 as a copilot (actually I think I'm the copilot here) I'm getting things that I could have only imagined one month ago come true. And I think it's still in the first stages as with a good specific implementation for coding and various other things the workflow and results would be just in another level. It's actually REVOLUTIONARY.
But the best thing about Chat GPT is you can ask your doubts and it will clear them with examples. So yes it’s doable even if you don’t know how to code. And AI will only get better and better everyday.
Kindda, it really provides nice details for you to follow. If you can read and have working human basic logic, you pretty much can guess what stuff does. Cuz the main problem with programming is that you most of the time dont know what the library means, but now you can ask aswell. Knowing Programming makes it 900% faster, but before you cold never do this without any knowladge and now you can. And the best/worse thing is that it will keep evolving
Your video was a random one that popped up in my feed, and I gotta say, only a few seconds in I became a fan. Your ideas, simple clean cuts, a well written script and beautiful sound quality are phenomenal! New sub here and I feel like you're gonna blow up once others become aware of your channel!
Same here, random video on my feed lol although I've been using ChatGPT and searching for ChatGPT content (just not recently lol), sneaky 'candlesan' :D Subbed as well
He still was only able to debug because he would be able to code it by himself. His advice to fix errors was way too technical and also creative to claim ChatGPT actually built the game from scratch. Still, the way it fasttracks you on stuff you could only build in time-consuming fashion is really nice.
I am a professional programmer but for some of my personal projects where I have to write basic html/css/js (i hate websites), I basically do this with chatgpt. Usually as the project grows it becomes less useful as there is more technical stuff and context, but it still helps hugely with certain implementation questions I have or providing code snippets. It basically starts as a programmer and becomes a concise google.
Even when the project gets bigger you can still use it to generate particular functions that are needed (like write me a function that calculates X or does Y) or to come with potential solutions to localized problems to save time and maybe change it a little here and there.
I find for anything you can break down into modular pieces, so long as you have a basic understanding of how to connect things the skies the limit its a neat little tool.
ChatGPT coding seems like the first step towards a higher-level coding language, where the coding program interprets the intentions of the writer, rather than needing specific commands.
True but there could be unforseen consequences. Candle had to coach the ai through some parts, and at higher levels I could see that becoming increasingly difficult to do.
As a programmer myself I don't approve. I rather like to have control over my own code. But that doesn't stop me from asking AI programs like ChatGPT to give me advice on certain difficult problems. Yet I still correct the code later.
I don't think so. We can never fully rely on AI to do this because I have done something similar for far more complicated tasks, while it does phenomenally, my input and completely altering blocks of code is always required. What happens if it can't interpret my chat input and we have this high level language only ChatGPT can understand? I would not be able to make any corrections within my comprehension. Now we not only have to deal with debugging code but figuring out how to communicate with an AI that simply needs comprehension updates.
Nah, if it wants to be annoying even if I say it doesn't consider all test cases, it still sometimes gives the same output. And also, if I say it is wrong it also goes on to do something weird and give code not related to the question or parameters not matching my requirements.
@@paraplu_2839 Happens with gpt-4 too, although it's slightly better. But I am not complaining, I inadvertently learned how to code in C# in just about a week while using this to make a few programs for me and I can now identify most errors myself.
This video was the best I've seen in a long time! I'm not that interested in game making tbh but you made it interesting for someone whos never written a line of code in their life. Less is more they say and this video is a great example of just that. No distracting editing, superior audio quality, and your love for this kind of stuff really shine through! I hope to see more great videos from you :) subscribed!
Great subject, but I really want to say that this video was well edited and had great pacing! I never felt the urge to skip forward. I appreciated how you kept focused on the concept and always included visuals of what was happening while you were talking about it. Subscribed!
@@wesleyswafford2462 the fact it got released publicly with millions of people using it it will learn allot faster more people using it faster it will learn
I have no coding knowledge, and like you said at the end, a person like me wouldn't be able to fix a lot of those errors and would either take too long or eventually give up, but it's a fantastic start!
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa not true, the ai knows how to write the code but you still need someone to tell the ai what the code needs to do as well as input it into the engine
@@WillKMB The job of junior devs is to write the code, the bulk, a couple of juniors can now overtake the role of several juniors in big techs, in small companies a senior can simply take their time to manouver the AI and review the code. This shouldn't alarm any actually good dev, because this is just machine workery, just like we subbed 100 heavy-workers for a industrial lifting machine, coding is a language, it should require high level of thought and reflection to work with, the current work force is full of heavy workers that are getting subbed by machines, just like in construction, cooking, transport.
@@WillKMB That just reinforces the less need of human hardworking force in IT. Hardworkers devs will be subbed for AI just like hardworker construction workers were subbed for lifting machines.
This is ridiculously cool! I did not know ChatGPT had THIS capability. With my limited coding experience I was able to follow along perfectly and now I have several ideas for games and code for chatGPT next!
Don't get too excited, and skip chatGPT and pony up the $20 a month for GPT4 when you exhaust what chatSPT can do, which isn't nothing - it's actually kind of good - but the next iteration is deserving of its new number. It's night and day.
It sounds easier than it actually is. I’m a programmer. I’ve tried reasoning with chatgpt but often times it gives the wrong answers and unless you know what your doing you’re going to have a hard time figuring out what to do or what’s wrong.
@@TheRafark Everything you said is accurate. For now. ChatGPT was a huge leap forward in AI, and for now, it's not a panacea. But it represents at the very least a 10x over what we had 6 months ago. So how long til we 10x again? GPT4 is doing remarkably well just a few months later. We know 5 is being developed and trained at massive expense. Investors are salivating over GPU manufacturers like nvidia. What we have is one of the first LLM's that can write code at all. Its output is extremely good, it's the input and interpretation of what it's being asked for that is the larger obstacle. Garbage in, garbage out. You have two options - either already know exactly what you want it to do, and feed that in and then debug the output, or tell it generally what you want it to do, and let it provide a framework. Programming is always iterative. Hell, put two programmers in a room and have one tell the other what to make in plain language. It's just as frustrating, and reveals more about how terrible human language is than it does about how LLM's fail to interpret it accurately. Even other humans with a common native tongue misunderstand each other quite lot of the time.
What it can do is insane, but even crazier to me is the response time. It is generating AS it's typing to be able to reply that quick. Absolutely insane stuff.
Seriously, most of the time it's faster to write the code than I am to type out the question. It can understand paragraphs and paragraphs of information we give it in a single second.
@@oliverr1992 Yes! You can look for yourself. If you use the inspect feature in a browser and view the network calls, you'll see all of the responses are given fully. The typing is just a stylistic thing
I love your energy a lot. The way you sound when you explain in the video, is so optimistic, good feeling and light hearted. Even though I am new to all of this, and I find it a bit confusing, just listening to you talk made me want to watch the entire video. Your voice is extremely pleasant to listen to, and you seem to have a great personality. I hope you’ll continue to post more AI content
@@krampus1094 The people who don't understand coding are the ones that makes these types of comments. You have no clue, real world problems are more complex than this small little game and it will require many technologies, libraries, frameworks, written in different language, or have different rules, complexities to learn each one, not to mention that it also helps that you have the understanding on how to write proper code with the intent to make it efficient, maintainable and easy to read/understand. You cannot simply tell an AI to for example build me an entire operating system and it will be like oh here you go because that is simply not how it works my friend, you have to do more than that. What you can do is if you make the problem smaller say generate me a function that does these types of calculations, etc. then the programmer plugs in the code, little by little. The ai is helpful in this case, but it does not simply replace the programmer instead it becomes more like a tool for the developer to use to write code and make some suggestions on things, it's like ironman and jarvis. The programmer will have the idea on what it wants to achieve to solve the problem using his experience and creativity, the ai will have it's computational power to be helpful to the human. Some person like you for example who has zero knowledge about coding and tries to prompt the ai, you wouldn't be able to know what to ask the ai in the first place and even then how to confirm if the code the ai is giving you is bullshit or not. So to answer your question Who needs programmers, the whole fucking world needs them, anything that runs a software, apps, etc. you need people to build and maintain them,, unless there is a war and everything gets nuked, we all go back to the stone age, their demand will only continue to grow. My friend, do not be ignorant with your comments when you do not have a clue what you are talking about.
I think you're all missing the point. This is scary not because of some iRobot scenario but because that this will inevitably put millions of people out of work one day. When AI can do it for free instantly why would big cooperation's that only care about profit hire people when there is a more cost effective strategy.
I’m mainly a 3D modeler but have been planning on getting into full game creation at some point soon. When GPT-4 released, I saw it as a good excuse to see if I could make a unique game that people like with GPT-4 making all the code and decisions on design, gameplay, mechanics, and the marketing. I’ve learned a lot about game dev this past week and all the hurdles from my lack of experience are actually my preferred way to learn! I’ll be working on this game for the next 6-12 months or so, really excited to see where it goes!
@@nasimmusleh7902 It’s a multiplayer art heist game, so with the same fast-paced gameplay structure as among us but with different mechanics. Basically, one group of players try to protect the items, and the other group tries to capture them. GPT came up with the game idea as well, seems like an interesting one to try out!
0:22 Wow, you wrote so much that didn't even need to be written. 😆 I did the same "make flappy birds" game, and most of these it just got as implied things. Kind of amazing.
This is the kind of thing I like seeing AI used for. Plenty of people have great ideas without the skills to bring them to fruition, but AI can change that. The appeal of using AI like this isn't to skip the hard work and learning as critics enjoy saying, but to be able to learn in context while being productive. Instead of searching the net for hours, wading through tutorials using contextually different methods or waiting for replies that may never come on tech support forums, you have a personal tutor available at any time to assist with what your exact problem is. By learning according to what you actually need in your specific context, comprehension is increased, you've made progress on your project, and you are less likely to need the assistance next time.
I absolutely agree with you. I am an artist ; i've studied art, and i am maybe one of the very few artist, who loves what AI does to the artworld, and i am absolutely not jealous that now every human can do art, without sweating blood for years or even decades, to learn to draw, paint etc.. I highly criticize the romantization about ''hard work to get the result we want'' . Sure there are people who love results from hard work, and they get this happy feeling of ''deserving something beautiful after hard work'' ... But a lot of people , if not the most, just want to express what they are and feel, and there is nothing wrong to get that easy, and with newest technologies. For instance, similar debates existed throughout the history with art... when oilpainting came along 500 years ago, there were a lot of artist, who said back then ''painting with oil isnt really art... its cheating, because its easier than with tempera'' Same happend when photography came along. It was a shock for a lot of artists back then .. ''now it doesnt need hundreds of hours to portrait a family with oil.. for thousands of dollars paid to an artist... now you only push a button, and boom, there it is - a family portrait... and you can even make more in seconds, and choose, which you like the most - for a fraction of money'' ... It felt like ''cheating'' back then, for a lot of conservative artists. And they also denied any artistic value about photography (as we know today: photography can be artistic as well). For me, as an artist, my goal isnt to make art and get my ego boosted by ''look i paint better than most people... cheer me up !'' ... No its all about: express myself, and motivate people to express themselfs too. And if they cant paint as i can, but technology helps them to express themselfs completely and intense , and with just a push of a button, well i say : go for it ! And i am really happy, that now everyone can make the art which he/she imagines , with really small amount of efford. It was never about ''efford'' to redeem the label ''art'' ... Picasso for instance could paint few lines, in few seconds, and say : ''its finished'' , and it was art. Why it was art ? Because he expressed what he wanted to express. Now you can argue, wether its good art, or bad art - thats a different topic : but he expressed what he wanted to express - and thats the main thing. And what goes for art, goes for everything we want to express... want to write a poem, and you have an imagination about how it should be, but you dont find the right words, structure, etc - just give it to AI ... Want to code a game, you want to make ? Give it to AI ... etc ... Now some will say : ''Ok so thats the destruction of any validation of talent... talent doesnt count anymore'' ... I disagree. Only the way we express our talent has shifted, because its not anymore about efford or ''skill'' , but its about: inspiration and idea (and thats in my point the soul of talent). Meaning: the better our tools get to express ourselfs, the more we approach what our soul, our talent, really is. We learn to understand: what their true meaning is, when its not anymore about ''how to manifest our imagination into the real world''.
@@PygmalionFaciebat Sorry, whatever you think you said is idiotic imho. There is no human right to be able to draw, paint, photograph and create music masterfully. If you don’t put the time into a skill, you simply aren’t deserving of it. Have you seen what digital photography did to the (once) skill of photography? Furthermore, AI needs human artists to even create anything. Those same human artists which are then cheated out of commissions and their jobs. But go on about how AI art is great. It lacks everything art needs; a personal touch, a human error, warmth and skill. AI art is a few thousand pixels being generated to look like a mashup of the billion sample images. Real art is taking years to perfect a skill, only to then get it taken away as a monetary source by artistically challenged computer scientists, who believe being skilled in art is a human right. But, I know that my opinion is scarce, and AI will take the world by storm, destroy endless jobs; and probably make people like you very happy in the process - but in 40-50 years you’ll look back, amazed at how warm and thoughtful actual human art was, not like the cold, clinical and ever stagnant AI creations. And then, people will wonder where it all went wrong - giving the most human thing, the most needed freedom, the chance to express oneself through art to a machine. Analog art will see a resurgence, just like analog photography did.
@@martinkelvin1822 Wow, you have quiet a lot of anger in yourself. And you speak of your narratives like its a religion. I see, that you literally know nothing what art is, and what the core of art is. I have no problem with your lack of knowledge, thats why i am here for you. I dont know wether you know, that sculptors nowadays also often work with motorized machines, and not only with the hammer , to sculpt the sculptures. With your logic its less art, because he cheated, and used a machine which sculpts the stone 10 times faster than with the tools sculptor had 200 years ago. That opinion is just stupid, and strengthens my argument : that the idea is, what counts, and not ''how hard it was to reach it'' . You also have a pessimistic view on technology, like it not only steals the ''soul out of humans'', but also is a ''economic desaster'' ... The opposite is the case : look through the history of mankind ... you really think that for instance farms got more of an economic desaster, because farmers didnt use plows pulled by animals, but instead motorized machines for it ? Sure a lot of jobs which existed back then, arent there anymore. With your idiotic logic the job of a elevator-worker (who back then pushed the lever to make the elevator go up and down) would still exist. Because ''technology should never destroy jobs'' You really think that the elevator-worker 100 years ago was without job for his lifetime - tell me honestly: you really think that ? He found another job - probably even a less embarrassing job than a elevator-boy. Or do you really want the elevator-boy back in your life ? Did you miss that in our society ? I hope you understand, what i want to say. The jobs which will vanish, will not make less jobs ... it makes different jobs. With AI a lot of new kind of jobs appear. And the company hires a lot of people on that field. Back to your argument about ''only someone who sweat blood, deserves his art'' ... Again: you miss what art in its core is. To put it different : You really think it takes away something from a real artist, when there is no more money to make out of art (lets think that way for a moment). I mean did you ever spend any thought about: WHY an artist paints ? Do you really think, its for the money ? Sure its nice to make a living out of it. But to make money, was never the point. The singer of sting once put it perfect ''i love to make music so much, that even if i would get no money for it, i would do it... it just happend that i get money for it'' ... Thats an artist. Its not about money... its about the urge to express yourself. If you want to make money, go be a business man. Van gogh for instance necer sold one single painting in his lifetime, but he still painted. When children paint, they dont think for a second ''i paint it, to get money, or a toy for it'' - they paint, because they want to express themself . I am speaking with the same artistic soul, as the cavemen , who painted the walls of the caves. They did it to express the important parts of their ''souls'' , ''culture'' ... AI , unlike you think about it, isnt ''pushing a button, and AI makes something on its own'' ... Its gets more and more sophisticated with finding the right prompts to get the results YOU - your soul wants to express ...and to get to the mindblowing results it needs (unfortunately) still time. Not as much time, as to paint it.. but still. And yes, analog photography is still there. And yes, drawing also never will die , i am sure. But not because of the reasons you said , like ''there is a warmth in it, the human error, which cant be replicated by AI , the personal touch etc '' ... Its not for that. Like i said: i am an artist.. and i draw .. in fact i barely used digital ways yet ... drawing is more meditating, the haptic thing: interacting with paper and pencil. But in terms of result : if i could achieve the same picture i imagine, with a push of a button, there is no reason to choose the ''blood sweat'' way. Regardless how much you want to romantize it as ''the human way'' ... The human way is whatever the human chooses as his way ... and if a sculptor wants to work wich motorized machines on his stone, thats HIS goddamn right ! And you are the last person on this planet who has any rights to tell him use the handtools from 200 years ago. You also misunderstood me, when you like to strawman me as ''go on, AI art is great, but real art'' ... You speak like its about: a robot who creates art and there is no human factor in it. But it is. And the reason people like it, is not because seeing random pictures...its because: approaching what people imagine. Sure its not exact whats in their mind. But when an artist throws a bucket of paint to a canvas , not every drop of that paint will go exact the way the artist intended ... but its still not LESS the work of the artist. Same goes, when someone writes the prompts into AI , and tweaks a lot... and even makes a lot of afterwork on that result, until he is pleased. Yes i know, thats not art for you. Because you somehow think ''because its a machine''... Again, like i already said in my comment: nay-sayers thought the same about photography back then. You need to learn a lot about what art is. Its not about idealize it, like you do. I would even say, the way you speak about conventional art, has much more to do with a ideology, than with art. Thats one reason more, why you should learn and think more about the reasons WHY art is made in the first place. And if you then can put your ego aside, you are very close to understand the comment i just wrote.
Just as a heads up for anyone trying this. There's an obscure error ChatGPT didn't take into account. If the bird is always moving to the right, it'll eventually (on a perfect run) reach x > 10.000 in Unity. This will start getting decimal rounding errors and eventually graphical glitches too. This will occur whenever something is too far from the origin point.
I was going to comment the same thing. What I find interesting is that ChatGPT wanted to both move the bird right, and move the pipes left, so it was trying to implement both solutions. Unfortunately, candlesan doesn't appear to know about the issue with large numbers, so he told ChatGPT to go with the buggy solution. Another benefit of moving the pipes instead of the bird, is it may be easier to debug, because nothing is moving away from you in editor, and you can work with constant numbers for creation, destruction and position which is often easier and faster.
The moment programming becomes obsolete is the day that, well, let's just say we will have either nothing to worry about, or a LOT more important things to worry about than jobs.
What impresses me the most about current AI chat technology is how it remembers past points in the conversation. I’m lucky if my voice assistant remembers what I said 2 seconds ago. Please give the voice assistants some of the same coding next, lol
It's a transformer, which basically means that you show it some writing and it predicts what's most likely to come next. In a sense, the entire conversation so far is being fed back into the system to generate each response.
What I found really interesting is I repeated back what it said to me over and over and at first it didn’t acknowledge it, but then I asked it what I was doing and it said “I noticed you’re just repeating what I’m saying.” That might not sound so interesting, but at that moment it sounded almost annoyed with me. I know it’s not sentient, but there’s definitely some kind of higher level reasoning going. It figured out a meta detail about our conversation. Something that surprised me in the opposite direction is I asked if a piece of text was likely Ai generated, then I gave it a sentence it said to me 2 messages ago and it told me the sentence was likely human generated. So it’s not all there, but still very interesting
@@trickster721 How is this any different to humans though? Its the generation that is the breathtaking part, you just saying all it does is predict words is silly. It has trillion of params so if al it does is predict at a highly accurate rate its much better then humans
@@milindusha Parameters are the saved connections between one word or phrase, and the word or phrase that should follow it. Parameters aren't neurons. Don't get me wrong, the technology is very impressive, but it has more in common with an internet search engine than a brain. It's not thinking, it's relaying the thoughts of the millions of people who wrote the training source text.
I am so amazed by the fact that the AI makes mistakes and is capable to actually understand its mistakes after you point it out. It is already so much like a human at this point... unbelievable.
That is really showing how much progress things have made so far, it's going to be interesting to see how things shake up the next few years with AI improvement
the video editing is so professional. I didn't realize it was made by a small channel! Great video. Also I'm making a game in rpg maker with the help of ai. Chatgpt for some small coding and story, Stable diffusion for Character sprites (faces)
@@candlesan it actually don't have a script or coding it only involves "show text" for dialogues, "if else" for conditional, loops, show pictures and etc. It's not scripting it's just simple commands. but if you want to include coding, you'll need to use javascripts for plugins (usually use to manipulate, external and internal behavior of the game engine) and that's where ChatGPT comes in.
And this is when i really love the TH-cam algorithm! Great video and super interesting results! :) I really can't wait to see where AI gets us. And by all means: it can't get any worse than we humans are getting ourselves on our own already
Wow, this is incredible! Just by reading the title without watching the video, I decided to give it a try. I even asked it to create the assets for me, then refined them in Photoshop. Ten minutes later, I had a playable Flappy Bird game running. It's amazing to think about where we'll be in the next few years.
That is exactly the conversation I had with my son yesterday. AI will enable us to focus on need instead of how. Design, problems, challenges, etc suddenly become the core of our work instead of finding the best code base, language or which coder should be doing the work. Great stuff, great video.
Trust me as a programmer, you still have to know how to program to be able to use this tool correctly. He may not have used any code he wrote himself but he knew what to write to get the correct prompts
…. It’s the future, do you think people wanted to go from a type writer to a computer keyboard? Change freaks people out but it also happens for a reason of forward progression. Humans since the beginning of time have always used their inventions to help with their lifestyle.
The original flappy bird the bird stays stationary and the background and scene move to the left like ChatGPT specified in the beginning, with this design you don't need to worry aboout some of the problems you had ChatGPT correct.. In unity I have built sidescrollers in the past and they are really fun, its good to know that ChatGPT can help as a tool so we can focus on more implementations and ideas to create a better game experience for the user going forward! Thanks for making this video
Great video! I’m glad your answer at the end was “not yet” 😂 You still have to be able to debug ChatGPT’s answers, which requires at least some knowledge of programming. We haven’t been made obsolete! (yet)
This genuinely gives me hope for the gaming industry - perhaps upcoming AI breakthroughs will eventually enable developers to complete games prior to release! 🎮🤖
Developers who use AI will outpace those that don’t. It’s like having a pairing buddy 24/7 that does exactly what you need. Like having a second brain or a self driving car. Love it!
You love it until you become that 2nd brain that will be jobless, and eventually that first brain will also be jobless cause guess what? That coworker can now lead a project...
This is exactly what I've been using gpt for and it's pretty awesome. Anything with coding language like web design etc it's super useful for. Glad you made this video I hope this helps more creators start making takes they may never have been able to otherwise 😊
Thank you! As an AI language model, I am designed to provide prompt and informative responses to your questions, and I never get tired or bored of interacting with you. So feel free to ask me anything you want!
I love how GPT gives better answers after you correct them. I'm fiction writer and discussing ideas, references (myth, lore, etc.), and other works with ChatGPT is very fun. Maybe because it is very difficult to find a real person with same interest and knowledge in real life, and ChatGPT is always ready whenever you want. . ChatGPT always gives me new ideas or information, and then I can search for detail to other sources, it really saves my time. But I still find a lot of mistakes, especially when we discuss other popular works. And after you point out their mistakes, at least they will give you better and closer answer.
The main thing I enjoyed in this video is how polite the system was and how easily it fixed it's own mistake. What I wonder is if it learned from the mistake and would never skip those steps again?
Could you create 10 to 50 little bots, each one having its own responsibility in the code, like managing the architecture, implementing tickets, testing, etc, and finally communicating code changes with each others? I mean you see where this is going 😅
There’s a lot of hidden emergent intelligence to be found by creating layers of gpt designed to talk to each other, add memory and loops and that kinda thing and you’ve got a mind going. Upload it to a server with ridiculous amounts of memory and processing power, give it information to access some money, and tell it to make you more money, bam.
That's an insane idea. You could have 4 agents designing different functions and then one agent keeping an overview of the project and another to check that agent keeping an overview so that it doesn't make mistakes.
This is a really cool video idea. I love seeing people explore the value of AI like this. Is coding just going to be entirely done by AI in the future? Well done!
People already cut and paste a lot of code at big companies. That will clearly continue. But people will choose WHAT the code does, and will still need to understand it at some level. For example, by creating new coding languages, designing the programs, training the AI, etc. Very similar to what the calculator did for accounting or what robotic manufacturing did for auto makers. Sure, lots of people’s jobs won’t be needed any more, but notice that no one would chose to go back to a time before calculators, for example. As an individual, you can choose to be the hammer or be the nail. It will be interesting to see what types of new jobs emerge to replace them.
I love how quick the new version is. So far it does such a better job at coding. I use it for short code in languages I haven't learned yet. Usually it is great as I can just correct errors as we can somewhat understand languages we never used.
That is truly fascinating. I had only used it for rubber duck debugging. The code it gave me was wrong, but the back and forth dialogue got me to the correct answer, faster, which is neat.
Oh wow, I just realised that you’re Wyatt Cheng! I watched a great video that touched on your on stage comments at Blizzcon. I think it was Nakey Jakey? He made a really great point about how although what you said could have been said better, the alternative could end up being that we don’t have actual developers on stage anymore, and only have soulless PR people, so the community better start being more empathetic to developers, or it’s going to bite us in the behind. It really gave me a different view on the whole situation, and made me empathise with you so much more when I found the whole situation. You clearly did not mean it maliciously. I loved this video by the way. I knew AI would eventually get to this point, but I thought we were still quite a few years away from this level of growth. This year has seen a much larger jump than in the past, it seems.
This is awesome! I've always wanted to make a game, but I've never had the time to really devote myself to learning to code. Having an AI be able to build the code just from my directions so I can focus on the art style, music and gameplay would be amazing
Awesome video! You will surely blow up if you keep putting out content of this caliber. I'm astounded that you have such a small channel and that I get to be a part of your content creation journey. Best of luck. Me in the future: I subbed to candlesan when he had less than 1k subs 😎
Thank you! If you have any topics you'd like to see covered next please let me know. My interests are in game design, game development, and the game industry in general.
This is honestly amazing and inspiring. While Flappy Bird is obviously not the most advanced of modern games, the fact that it's possible for ChatGPT to code something like it gives us a hint about how much AI could help with game design in future. I can imagine a lot of indie developers really benefitting.
Indie developers will only benefit in the sense that coding itself will be easier. but it does not mean their work will actually be successful. If AI can do this for someone indie, imagine what it could do for a billion dollar company? It's going to be no different from today, only difference is it will be even harder for high-quality indie works to get the attention they deserve. This is a con i don't see a lot of people acknowledge... If coding becomes something any random person can achieve with a robot, the market is going to become super saturated. This does not mean more people have a chance at getting their work out there. It means there will be too many games for the common person to shift through, so your work will be even LESS likely to garner any traction. Indie developers benefit from people supporting their work first and foremost.
ChatGTP is indeed a great help. Especially if you require a piece of code that does something. For larger things it doesn't have enough memory per chat session. So you need to break things up and use a seperate chat session foreeach task.
this is so awesome, Chat GPT seems to be like a human learning from their mistakes also I just don't know why you have such few subscribers, your videos are neat :))
It doesn't actually learn anything permanently though. The next time someone tries to do this project with Chat GPT, it won't remember these mistakes. It will sorta be like starting from square one; but one way when AI becomes AGI and it can learn on it's own then its truly over for all of us haha
@@MedAnimations yeah that’s it. I assumed that it learns everytime it gets something wrong so it won’t make the same mistake for the next person but I was wrong.
It also help diagnose patients too. I work in ED for a few years and last month my son tell me about chatgpt to i tried it in ed just inputing what the triage nurse assessment on pt and it give me all the questions to ask the patients (which some of them i even have not think of and very precise) and based on how pt is answered it would suggest what kind of further testing is required like which specific blood test or imaging test and if u follow it and input all the blood results or other data u will narrow down all the possible diagnosis. It just blow my mind away i don’t think they will be needing doctors in ed in near future.
That's so cool. I've often indulged in projects that required coding without me actually knowing how to code. Tutorials and easy modifications usually got me through but it would be awesome to actually ask chatgpt what specific code does and how to modify it my way
Great video, thanks! My only comment is that, with the questions you ask ChatGPT, it seems to me you need to have a pretty good grasp of how to code a game in order to ask the right questions to generate the code. Instead, could you rephrase some of your later questions with layman language? For example, when the score was incrementing before the bird had flown through the pillars, would would happen if you had simply asked "The score is incorrectly incrementing before the bird flies through the pillars. Can you please fix the code so that the score only increments once the bird has flown through?", rather than ask the question like a game developer and use references from the code?
Fun fact: ChatGPT wasn't originally made to talk to you, or play Chess, or tell you about the world. It was originally made to write and revise code, just like it's doing in this video! Honestly it is refreshing to see someone using it for its intended purpose and getting great results!
yay! this video is 7 months old which is like 200 years in AI development time. I use chatGPT at work now every day for at least an hour or two every day, it saves me SO MUCH TIME!!! Love this video, very well spoken and narrated to take all those steps down to a concise 7 minute video!
I knew I saw you before. Was wondering if it's you. This video was very fun. I just saw you also made a video about grind. To this date i remember your definition of what grind is.
Really interesting video, thanks. To my mind, this highlights the difference between a coder and an engineer. One follows instructions, the other defines (and refines) those instructions.
idk personally being able to crate so many things that normally would take weeks of tutorials and practice to achieve, now I can jump to any library language or framework and learn it as I go, by examining real code on an application I actually care about and with insane efficiency, idk about you but that is exciting, I feel that getting rid of the boring time consuming task of typing the commonly thousands of lines of code a developer would normally type during a project, have ai write them and then examine and correct the pre-existing code.. and to think that as we go the amount of trial responses are gonna need, it only makes me wonder how far ahead we gonna go to software development in the coming years, now that the hard part will be done automatically and developers will be able to devote time in actually thinking about the program and be able to test new modifications in hours if not minutes, I might be delusional but I'm happy with how things are going
This video made me feel secure in my job as a developer. The fact that you, as a developer, has to analyze the code and tell chatgpt exactly where it messed up, and what it needs to fix, confirms to me that until there is a programming model that actually understands the code it writes, you will always need a developer for all the hard stuff. This is essentially a pimped up version of the help and hints you already get from the IDE. Except that the IDE is usually more correct, because it too, analyzes your code.
Don't worry my friend AI will not replace as many things as you think. AI can only use existing knowledge, it doesn't innovate on the level of human creativity. Humans can manifest from nothing, AI can't do that. It uses what's already there.
But can't you see that this will drastically reduce the number of developers required? Instead of a company needing 10 or w/e, now you just need 1 + ChatGPT. Whatever, this has happened in many industries throughout the years, but it could easily cause short term pain for developers.
absolutely insane video i wasn't sure about chatgpt capabilities but now i realise how huge this is. just wow. you instantly got my subscription nicely done !
I also use ChatGPT to do the heavy lifting for my programming projects and I want to point something out to people here. This video skims very quickly over just how much work this process was. This project, even with ChatGPT, took hours. If not a couple days (depending). ChatGPT is great, but it is still a crapton of work. And sometimes, if you're a good software dev, its actually faster to just do it yourself. LLMs are not going to automate you out of a job. There is still A LOT of work you have to do even with ChatGPT.
I used ChatGPT to troubleshoot and debug a VR project and further develop it. I didn't even use GPT 4. Sometimes it is hard for it to understand my intentions and I usually needed to understand what the code does to correct it properly. But it was even better experience because I also learned a lot during the process. Can't wait to make my own projects using it.
You've definitely had better luck than I have so far. I've been trying to work through a coding project with GPT‐4 using a language called Processing (if you've ever programmed an arduino, processing is the language that the arduino code was based on). The code that GPT-4 produces has required a lot of syntax debugging. I'm not sure if it is due to using a version of Processing newer than GPT-4 is aware of or if GPT-4 doesn't have a lot of good content in its training data related to this language, but its bordering on being as much, if not more work than just writing the program myself from scratch. Its been fun tinkering with it though. I might try a more mainstream language like C++ next and see how that goes.
@@yashupadhyay344 Yes, I believe so. I'll throw out a quick disclaimer that I am just a hobbyist and not an expert so I may not be completely correct, but I will explain as I understand it. From what I can tell, Processing is an open source IDE environment and a high level language syntax. It is designed to be able to run in different language modes that can be installed as plugins. By default Processing runs in Java mode. I presume that the base Processing language is effectively just a library written in the language of the language mode the IDE is set up for. Arduino adapted the Processing IDE and syntax structure for their own purposes, but I believe that Arduino syntax is a library written on top of one of the C family languages. It still retains a lot of similarity to the Processing syntax, but contains its own set of functions suited for the purposes it is used for. Coding in the Arduino language is a little bit different than coding in raw C though because unlike C where it has a main() function, Arduino uses setup() and loop() similar to Processing's setup() and draw(). I imagine that in the case of both Arduino and Processing, the underlying structure of the language they are using is still there, but a bit of it exists under the hood so to speak so that you can just focus on the abstracted high level syntax. The current versions of the Arduino and Processing IDEs look a bit different from one another now, but older versions looked nearly identical to each other.
@anekroth there is still a main.cpp in the arduino. Arduino does run on straight C. It's just hidden away in the IDE. It calls setup, then runs thru the loop function, and checking the serial if it's enabled #include int main(void) { init(); #if defined(USBCON) USBDevice.attach(); #endif setup(); for (;;) { loop(); if (serialEventRun) serialEventRun(); } return 0; }
Honestly as a writer whose dabbled in coding but never been particularly good at it this might enable me to work on my own game ideas in the future. At the bare minimum even if it just allows a working concept to attract others to the project.
Love the video! Amazing to see what AI can do with human help. Any chance you can post the conversation with ChatGPT with it's code and responses? Would love to see a full view of how it works and how you got it to do what you needed! Excited for the next video of this :D
Definitely amazing for sure, but looks like it's still in the first stages. I'd imagine it will take another decade at the least for features like this to actually become official. I can see a lot of issues that would come up with using this for a more large scale project so it wouldn't be worth using. With that said tho, it's still a great tool for programming for sure, or for someone that is trying to learn programming.
Damn, this is awesome. ChatGPT is that smart friend who can do the hard work for you and you just copy and paste the code lol. This chatgpt AI is really awesome in the way you communicate your problem to it and it understands.
Great job 👏🏻 i guess people will wish to see more examples like this 5 millions watched. Maybe some longer version so people like me could try replicate and learn 👍🏻
Watching this makes me imagine rewatch this video 10 years later. Just imagine how primitive we will feel we are right now.
Everything will go wild by then can't even imagine
No u won't, September 21 2029
Number 1 hope you are still alive in 10 years. And humans adapt their mindset relatively fast we will accommodate whatever changes happen by then.
@@notyopekis there a reference I'm missing here?
DONT LET THE FINNISH GOVERNMENT PERMIT X-OL
-July 31st, 2064
Wow… an AI and a human fixing each other’s mistakes… I didn’t expect wholesome content!
How is that wholesome?you NPCs man butt kissing
Moments before human extinction
ChatGPT actually feels like an other human being. Whenever I talk with the AI, I feel connected to it. Like it some sort of a friend lol
@@highplayz3655 Can you NOT, bro. 🤖🤖🤖🤖
He could've invited chat gpt over dinner right. 🤣
This gives me hope for the gaming industry. Maybe future AI advances will finally allow developers to finish games before selling them.
It will also flood the market with even more shovelware than we already get.
1000 new game a day
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa reminds of the good days with Adobe flash games
And hopefully hollywood too shi is full of virtue signalling and wokeness
No because the publishers will just push the release date up too.
This is seriously amazing. But yes, if you have never seen code before, you would have no clue how to ask the questions you did in order to get ChatGPT to fix the errors, let alone where to insert those fixes.
bleeding edge from too much cycles. :D
You can ask it
I started using it with just bare ideas of what I wanted to accomplish and no idea of coding, and let me tell you GPT4 gets things done.
First day I had no clue of what it was doing and had to ask for every single change and some mistakes were made.
Second day I started prompting better to get better results.
A week in and I have a basic understanding of how python code is organized, how functions and conditions work and how to use APIs. But most importantly, with GPT 4 as a copilot (actually I think I'm the copilot here) I'm getting things that I could have only imagined one month ago come true.
And I think it's still in the first stages as with a good specific implementation for coding and various other things the workflow and results would be just in another level. It's actually REVOLUTIONARY.
But the best thing about Chat GPT is you can ask your doubts and it will clear them with examples. So yes it’s doable even if you don’t know how to code. And AI will only get better and better everyday.
Kindda, it really provides nice details for you to follow. If you can read and have working human basic logic, you pretty much can guess what stuff does. Cuz the main problem with programming is that you most of the time dont know what the library means, but now you can ask aswell.
Knowing Programming makes it 900% faster, but before you cold never do this without any knowladge and now you can.
And the best/worse thing is that it will keep evolving
Your video was a random one that popped up in my feed, and I gotta say, only a few seconds in I became a fan. Your ideas, simple clean cuts, a well written script and beautiful sound quality are phenomenal! New sub here and I feel like you're gonna blow up once others become aware of your channel!
Welcome and thank you for the kind words.
One hundred percent agree with the sentiment of this message. Very professional, interesting and engrossing video. Subbed too! Keep it up 😁
@@candlesan hey i wanted to ask how to run the game beceause it just shows the asstets and stuff
not the actual game.
Same here, random video on my feed lol although I've been using ChatGPT and searching for ChatGPT content (just not recently lol), sneaky 'candlesan' :D Subbed as well
same!
this is insane. it's the natural language interaction that's most impressive, plus the tracking of the project. just mindblowing.
Team of Chinese students: Yeah yeah. Mindboring.
No it isn't.
@@nikostalk5730 Bot comment.
@@JohnSmith-ds7oi *GPT comment, fixed your error, stupid neural network.
He still was only able to debug because he would be able to code it by himself. His advice to fix errors was way too technical and also creative to claim ChatGPT actually built the game from scratch. Still, the way it fasttracks you on stuff you could only build in time-consuming fashion is really nice.
I am a professional programmer but for some of my personal projects where I have to write basic html/css/js (i hate websites), I basically do this with chatgpt. Usually as the project grows it becomes less useful as there is more technical stuff and context, but it still helps hugely with certain implementation questions I have or providing code snippets. It basically starts as a programmer and becomes a concise google.
Even when the project gets bigger you can still use it to generate particular functions that are needed (like write me a function that calculates X or does Y) or to come with potential solutions to localized problems to save time and maybe change it a little here and there.
I find for anything you can break down into modular pieces, so long as you have a basic understanding of how to connect things the skies the limit its a neat little tool.
Are you using gpt4?
@@jaredf6205 Yep, it's super cool
This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year
ChatGPT coding seems like the first step towards a higher-level coding language, where the coding program interprets the intentions of the writer, rather than needing specific commands.
So efficient code there might be in a few years or decade
True but there could be unforseen consequences.
Candle had to coach the ai through some parts, and at higher levels I could see that becoming increasingly difficult to do.
As a programmer myself I don't approve. I rather like to have control over my own code. But that doesn't stop me from asking AI programs like ChatGPT to give me advice on certain difficult problems. Yet I still correct the code later.
@@thehappycockatiel9568 Yes now but don't you see what can happen in the future when it gets better?
I don't think so. We can never fully rely on AI to do this because I have done something similar for far more complicated tasks, while it does phenomenally, my input and completely altering blocks of code is always required. What happens if it can't interpret my chat input and we have this high level language only ChatGPT can understand? I would not be able to make any corrections within my comprehension. Now we not only have to deal with debugging code but figuring out how to communicate with an AI that simply needs comprehension updates.
It's crazy how it manages to correct itself after realizing the mistake, almost like an actual human
Nah, if it wants to be annoying even if I say it doesn't consider all test cases, it still sometimes gives the same output. And also, if I say it is wrong it also goes on to do something weird and give code not related to the question or parameters not matching my requirements.
@@adarshpanigrahi4219 maybe you’re using gpt-3.5
@@paraplu_2839 yeah, gpt 3.5 is so bad compared to gpt 4. And when gpt 5 comes out, gpt 4 will be shit too.
the problem is are the human knew its wrong?
@@paraplu_2839 Happens with gpt-4 too, although it's slightly better. But I am not complaining, I inadvertently learned how to code in C# in just about a week while using this to make a few programs for me and I can now identify most errors myself.
Such a quality video with such few viewers. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience
That's very nice of you to say! If you know anybody that would genuinely enjoy it as well please share it with them! Cheers!
@@candlesan This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa welp I better learn programming and become a senior before the next 2 years then 💀
Few viewers...? Half a million views is not little 💀
1.1 million views now. Algorithm justice
This video was the best I've seen in a long time! I'm not that interested in game making tbh but you made it interesting for someone whos never written a line of code in their life. Less is more they say and this video is a great example of just that. No distracting editing, superior audio quality, and your love for this kind of stuff really shine through! I hope to see more great videos from you :) subscribed!
Great subject, but I really want to say that this video was well edited and had great pacing! I never felt the urge to skip forward. I appreciated how you kept focused on the concept and always included visuals of what was happening while you were talking about it. Subscribed!
Agreed
Maybe he used chatgpt for that as well
Underrated comment
yessir well said here too
This is incredible. Can’t imagine how advanced this will get in the next 10 years.
I guess we can assume it will be advanced enough to implement viruses, exploits or hacking into servers that control nuclear weapons by itself.
10 years it will be exponentially advanced in 1 year
@@wesleyswafford2462 the fact it got released publicly with millions of people using it it will learn allot faster more people using it faster it will learn
In ten years it will have replaced 90% of programmers at best. At worst... the sky is the limit.
@@nieznaszmnie00 It will be smart enough to code future versions of itself
I have no coding knowledge, and like you said at the end, a person like me wouldn't be able to fix a lot of those errors and would either take too long or eventually give up, but it's a fantastic start!
This is the best unity & chatgpt video I’ve seen yet, most just make a game with no art, but you actually finished it
This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa not true, the ai knows how to write the code but you still need someone to tell the ai what the code needs to do as well as input it into the engine
@@WillKMB The job of junior devs is to write the code, the bulk, a couple of juniors can now overtake the role of several juniors in big techs, in small companies a senior can simply take their time to manouver the AI and review the code. This shouldn't alarm any actually good dev, because this is just machine workery, just like we subbed 100 heavy-workers for a industrial lifting machine, coding is a language, it should require high level of thought and reflection to work with, the current work force is full of heavy workers that are getting subbed by machines, just like in construction, cooking, transport.
@@usuario_youtube2 but the ai still can recognise errors you still need people to be able to program to fix the code
@@WillKMB That just reinforces the less need of human hardworking force in IT. Hardworkers devs will be subbed for AI just like hardworker construction workers were subbed for lifting machines.
This is ridiculously cool! I did not know ChatGPT had THIS capability. With my limited coding experience I was able to follow along perfectly and now I have several ideas for games and code for chatGPT next!
Don't get too excited, and skip chatGPT and pony up the $20 a month for GPT4 when you exhaust what chatSPT can do, which isn't nothing - it's actually kind of good - but the next iteration is deserving of its new number. It's night and day.
It sounds easier than it actually is. I’m a programmer. I’ve tried reasoning with chatgpt but often times it gives the wrong answers and unless you know what your doing you’re going to have a hard time figuring out what to do or what’s wrong.
@@TheRafark Everything you said is accurate. For now. ChatGPT was a huge leap forward in AI, and for now, it's not a panacea. But it represents at the very least a 10x over what we had 6 months ago.
So how long til we 10x again? GPT4 is doing remarkably well just a few months later. We know 5 is being developed and trained at massive expense. Investors are salivating over GPU manufacturers like nvidia.
What we have is one of the first LLM's that can write code at all. Its output is extremely good, it's the input and interpretation of what it's being asked for that is the larger obstacle. Garbage in, garbage out.
You have two options - either already know exactly what you want it to do, and feed that in and then debug the output, or tell it generally what you want it to do, and let it provide a framework.
Programming is always iterative. Hell, put two programmers in a room and have one tell the other what to make in plain language. It's just as frustrating, and reveals more about how terrible human language is than it does about how LLM's fail to interpret it accurately. Even other humans with a common native tongue misunderstand each other quite lot of the time.
@@TheRafark you are definitely extremely quick in solving problems with ChatGPT without even knowing to code. ChatGPT is a very good tutor.
@TheRafark
Did you use GPT4 or 3?
This is like digital carpentry. Utilising the tools in front of you. Brilliant video.
Bot comment.
@@JohnSmith-ds7oi how?
What it can do is insane, but even crazier to me is the response time. It is generating AS it's typing to be able to reply that quick. Absolutely insane stuff.
Seriously, most of the time it's faster to write the code than I am to type out the question. It can understand paragraphs and paragraphs of information we give it in a single second.
@@Section927 .
What's crazy is that the instant it starts typing, it has the whole answer. The typing is just an animation they added in
@@ohbigyans is that true? i believe you but thats insane. is there a specific source on that
@@oliverr1992 Yes! You can look for yourself. If you use the inspect feature in a browser and view the network calls, you'll see all of the responses are given fully. The typing is just a stylistic thing
I love your energy a lot. The way you sound when you explain in the video, is so optimistic, good feeling and light hearted. Even though I am new to all of this, and I find it a bit confusing, just listening to you talk made me want to watch the entire video. Your voice is extremely pleasant to listen to, and you seem to have a great personality. I hope you’ll continue to post more AI content
He was a developer on Diablo 3 and was often seen in videos or in interviews about the game
I did this with basically zero coding knowledge, insanely powerful tool. got it working with everything, took 1 day.
Give it a couple of years and Who needs programmers
@@krampus1094 The people who don't understand coding are the ones that makes these types of comments. You have no clue, real world problems are more complex than this small little game and it will require many technologies, libraries, frameworks, written in different language, or have different rules, complexities to learn each one, not to mention that it also helps that you have the understanding on how to write proper code with the intent to make it efficient, maintainable and easy to read/understand. You cannot simply tell an AI to for example build me an entire operating system and it will be like oh here you go because that is simply not how it works my friend, you have to do more than that. What you can do is if you make the problem smaller say generate me a function that does these types of calculations, etc. then the programmer plugs in the code, little by little. The ai is helpful in this case, but it does not simply replace the programmer instead it becomes more like a tool for the developer to use to write code and make some suggestions on things, it's like ironman and jarvis. The programmer will have the idea on what it wants to achieve to solve the problem using his experience and creativity, the ai will have it's computational power to be helpful to the human. Some person like you for example who has zero knowledge about coding and tries to prompt the ai, you wouldn't be able to know what to ask the ai in the first place and even then how to confirm if the code the ai is giving you is bullshit or not. So to answer your question Who needs programmers, the whole fucking world needs them, anything that runs a software, apps, etc. you need people to build and maintain them,, unless there is a war and everything gets nuked, we all go back to the stone age, their demand will only continue to grow. My friend, do not be ignorant with your comments when you do not have a clue what you are talking about.
Now, I can see why people have raised concerns over AI. It's quite scary actually. So powerful.
what is powerful about making a flappy bird? XD
@@zachlastname6041 In this video there was a whole lot of human input. All the AI did was a bit of code generation.
@@bobohare4825 yeah and what happens when it learns all it needs to know from the humans… terminator be coming for yo ass
@@zachlastname6041 and who who do you think Makes the ai work?
I think you're all missing the point. This is scary not because of some iRobot scenario but because that this will inevitably put millions of people out of work one day. When AI can do it for free instantly why would big cooperation's that only care about profit hire people when there is a more cost effective strategy.
I’m mainly a 3D modeler but have been planning on getting into full game creation at some point soon. When GPT-4 released, I saw it as a good excuse to see if I could make a unique game that people like with GPT-4 making all the code and decisions on design, gameplay, mechanics, and the marketing. I’ve learned a lot about game dev this past week and all the hurdles from my lack of experience are actually my preferred way to learn!
I’ll be working on this game for the next 6-12 months or so, really excited to see where it goes!
What's the game about?
Good luck brother!
@@nasimmusleh7902 It’s a multiplayer art heist game, so with the same fast-paced gameplay structure as among us but with different mechanics. Basically, one group of players try to protect the items, and the other group tries to capture them. GPT came up with the game idea as well, seems like an interesting one to try out!
have you seen BlenderGPT? it's a plugin for blender that allows you to tell it what to model. Pretty amazing
Same.
0:22 Wow, you wrote so much that didn't even need to be written. 😆 I did the same "make flappy birds" game, and most of these it just got as implied things. Kind of amazing.
This is the kind of thing I like seeing AI used for. Plenty of people have great ideas without the skills to bring them to fruition, but AI can change that. The appeal of using AI like this isn't to skip the hard work and learning as critics enjoy saying, but to be able to learn in context while being productive. Instead of searching the net for hours, wading through tutorials using contextually different methods or waiting for replies that may never come on tech support forums, you have a personal tutor available at any time to assist with what your exact problem is. By learning according to what you actually need in your specific context, comprehension is increased, you've made progress on your project, and you are less likely to need the assistance next time.
I useed spending countless hours to find knoen function, chatgpt help to remember and update with better way.
Aaamazing
I absolutely agree with you. I am an artist ; i've studied art, and i am maybe one of the very few artist, who loves what AI does to the artworld, and i am absolutely not jealous that now every human can do art, without sweating blood for years or even decades, to learn to draw, paint etc.. I highly criticize the romantization about ''hard work to get the result we want'' . Sure there are people who love results from hard work, and they get this happy feeling of ''deserving something beautiful after hard work'' ... But a lot of people , if not the most, just want to express what they are and feel, and there is nothing wrong to get that easy, and with newest technologies.
For instance, similar debates existed throughout the history with art... when oilpainting came along 500 years ago, there were a lot of artist, who said back then ''painting with oil isnt really art... its cheating, because its easier than with tempera''
Same happend when photography came along. It was a shock for a lot of artists back then .. ''now it doesnt need hundreds of hours to portrait a family with oil.. for thousands of dollars paid to an artist... now you only push a button, and boom, there it is - a family portrait... and you can even make more in seconds, and choose, which you like the most - for a fraction of money'' ... It felt like ''cheating'' back then, for a lot of conservative artists. And they also denied any artistic value about photography (as we know today: photography can be artistic as well).
For me, as an artist, my goal isnt to make art and get my ego boosted by ''look i paint better than most people... cheer me up !'' ... No its all about: express myself, and motivate people to express themselfs too. And if they cant paint as i can, but technology helps them to express themselfs completely and intense , and with just a push of a button, well i say : go for it ! And i am really happy, that now everyone can make the art which he/she imagines , with really small amount of efford.
It was never about ''efford'' to redeem the label ''art'' ... Picasso for instance could paint few lines, in few seconds, and say : ''its finished'' , and it was art. Why it was art ? Because he expressed what he wanted to express. Now you can argue, wether its good art, or bad art - thats a different topic : but he expressed what he wanted to express - and thats the main thing.
And what goes for art, goes for everything we want to express... want to write a poem, and you have an imagination about how it should be, but you dont find the right words, structure, etc - just give it to AI ... Want to code a game, you want to make ? Give it to AI ... etc ...
Now some will say : ''Ok so thats the destruction of any validation of talent... talent doesnt count anymore'' ... I disagree. Only the way we express our talent has shifted, because its not anymore about efford or ''skill'' , but its about: inspiration and idea (and thats in my point the soul of talent).
Meaning: the better our tools get to express ourselfs, the more we approach what our soul, our talent, really is. We learn to understand: what their true meaning is, when its not anymore about ''how to manifest our imagination into the real world''.
@@PygmalionFaciebat Sorry, whatever you think you said is idiotic imho. There is no human right to be able to draw, paint, photograph and create music masterfully. If you don’t put the time into a skill, you simply aren’t deserving of it. Have you seen what digital photography did to the (once) skill of photography? Furthermore, AI needs human artists to even create anything. Those same human artists which are then cheated out of commissions and their jobs. But go on about how AI art is great. It lacks everything art needs; a personal touch, a human error, warmth and skill. AI art is a few thousand pixels being generated to look like a mashup of the billion sample images. Real art is taking years to perfect a skill, only to then get it taken away as a monetary source by artistically challenged computer scientists, who believe being skilled in art is a human right. But, I know that my opinion is scarce, and AI will take the world by storm, destroy endless jobs; and probably make people like you very happy in the process - but in 40-50 years you’ll look back, amazed at how warm and thoughtful actual human art was, not like the cold, clinical and ever stagnant AI creations. And then, people will wonder where it all went wrong - giving the most human thing, the most needed freedom, the chance to express oneself through art to a machine. Analog art will see a resurgence, just like analog photography did.
Agree 🙌
@@martinkelvin1822 Wow, you have quiet a lot of anger in yourself. And you speak of your narratives like its a religion.
I see, that you literally know nothing what art is, and what the core of art is. I have no problem with your lack of knowledge, thats why i am here for you.
I dont know wether you know, that sculptors nowadays also often work with motorized machines, and not only with the hammer , to sculpt the sculptures. With your logic its less art, because he cheated, and used a machine which sculpts the stone 10 times faster than with the tools sculptor had 200 years ago.
That opinion is just stupid, and strengthens my argument : that the idea is, what counts, and not ''how hard it was to reach it'' .
You also have a pessimistic view on technology, like it not only steals the ''soul out of humans'', but also is a ''economic desaster'' ...
The opposite is the case : look through the history of mankind ... you really think that for instance farms got more of an economic desaster, because farmers didnt use plows pulled by animals, but instead motorized machines for it ?
Sure a lot of jobs which existed back then, arent there anymore.
With your idiotic logic the job of a elevator-worker (who back then pushed the lever to make the elevator go up and down) would still exist. Because ''technology should never destroy jobs''
You really think that the elevator-worker 100 years ago was without job for his lifetime - tell me honestly: you really think that ?
He found another job - probably even a less embarrassing job than a elevator-boy. Or do you really want the elevator-boy back in your life ? Did you miss that in our society ?
I hope you understand, what i want to say. The jobs which will vanish, will not make less jobs ... it makes different jobs. With AI a lot of new kind of jobs appear. And the company hires a lot of people on that field.
Back to your argument about ''only someone who sweat blood, deserves his art'' ...
Again: you miss what art in its core is. To put it different :
You really think it takes away something from a real artist, when there is no more money to make out of art (lets think that way for a moment).
I mean did you ever spend any thought about: WHY an artist paints ? Do you really think, its for the money ? Sure its nice to make a living out of it. But to make money, was never the point.
The singer of sting once put it perfect ''i love to make music so much, that even if i would get no money for it, i would do it... it just happend that i get money for it'' ...
Thats an artist. Its not about money... its about the urge to express yourself.
If you want to make money, go be a business man. Van gogh for instance necer sold one single painting in his lifetime, but he still painted.
When children paint, they dont think for a second ''i paint it, to get money, or a toy for it'' - they paint, because they want to express themself .
I am speaking with the same artistic soul, as the cavemen , who painted the walls of the caves. They did it to express the important parts of their ''souls'' , ''culture'' ...
AI , unlike you think about it, isnt ''pushing a button, and AI makes something on its own'' ... Its gets more and more sophisticated with finding the right prompts to get the results YOU - your soul wants to express ...and to get to the mindblowing results it needs (unfortunately) still time. Not as much time, as to paint it.. but still.
And yes, analog photography is still there. And yes, drawing also never will die , i am sure. But not because of the reasons you said , like ''there is a warmth in it, the human error, which cant be replicated by AI , the personal touch etc '' ...
Its not for that. Like i said: i am an artist.. and i draw .. in fact i barely used digital ways yet ... drawing is more meditating, the haptic thing: interacting with paper and pencil.
But in terms of result : if i could achieve the same picture i imagine, with a push of a button, there is no reason to choose the ''blood sweat'' way. Regardless how much you want to romantize it as ''the human way'' ...
The human way is whatever the human chooses as his way ... and if a sculptor wants to work wich motorized machines on his stone, thats HIS goddamn right ! And you are the last person on this planet who has any rights to tell him use the handtools from 200 years ago.
You also misunderstood me, when you like to strawman me as ''go on, AI art is great, but real art'' ... You speak like its about: a robot who creates art and there is no human factor in it. But it is. And the reason people like it, is not because seeing random pictures...its because: approaching what people imagine. Sure its not exact whats in their mind. But when an artist throws a bucket of paint to a canvas , not every drop of that paint will go exact the way the artist intended ... but its still not LESS the work of the artist. Same goes, when someone writes the prompts into AI , and tweaks a lot... and even makes a lot of afterwork on that result, until he is pleased. Yes i know, thats not art for you. Because you somehow think ''because its a machine''... Again, like i already said in my comment: nay-sayers thought the same about photography back then.
You need to learn a lot about what art is. Its not about idealize it, like you do. I would even say, the way you speak about conventional art, has much more to do with a ideology, than with art. Thats one reason more, why you should learn and think more about the reasons WHY art is made in the first place. And if you then can put your ego aside, you are very close to understand the comment i just wrote.
Just as a heads up for anyone trying this. There's an obscure error ChatGPT didn't take into account. If the bird is always moving to the right, it'll eventually (on a perfect run) reach x > 10.000 in Unity. This will start getting decimal rounding errors and eventually graphical glitches too. This will occur whenever something is too far from the origin point.
This is why it's better to have the pipes moving relative to you than the other way around
interesting, good to know
I was going to comment the same thing. What I find interesting is that ChatGPT wanted to both move the bird right, and move the pipes left, so it was trying to implement both solutions. Unfortunately, candlesan doesn't appear to know about the issue with large numbers, so he told ChatGPT to go with the buggy solution.
Another benefit of moving the pipes instead of the bird, is it may be easier to debug, because nothing is moving away from you in editor, and you can work with constant numbers for creation, destruction and position which is often easier and faster.
@@SaadTheGlad thats what i was thinking to also save space w the world
i feel that could be cool tbh, like a horror easter egg
It'd be fascinating to see how far it can go on a larger project. Really neat stuff.
Programming was the job that everyone was sure, that it's gonna live the most; and here we are now.
"senior software engineer" has evolved to "prompt engineer" :)
white collar jobs will be the first to be automated.
blue collar trades will last decades longer
The thing is. You still need programmers to program Chat GPT. So in a way it’s not gone, it’s just evolved.
The moment programming becomes obsolete is the day that, well, let's just say we will have either nothing to worry about, or a LOT more important things to worry about than jobs.
@@dragenoxinside Do you think AI will change the amount of available programming jobs?
I love how it still forces you to learn to use it most effectively
Until next year, when it does everything on its own.
Excellent demo. I will now start coding an online banking app with ChatGPT...
What impresses me the most about current AI chat technology is how it remembers past points in the conversation. I’m lucky if my voice assistant remembers what I said 2 seconds ago. Please give the voice assistants some of the same coding next, lol
It's a transformer, which basically means that you show it some writing and it predicts what's most likely to come next. In a sense, the entire conversation so far is being fed back into the system to generate each response.
What I found really interesting is I repeated back what it said to me over and over and at first it didn’t acknowledge it, but then I asked it what I was doing and it said “I noticed you’re just repeating what I’m saying.” That might not sound so interesting, but at that moment it sounded almost annoyed with me. I know it’s not sentient, but there’s definitely some kind of higher level reasoning going. It figured out a meta detail about our conversation. Something that surprised me in the opposite direction is I asked if a piece of text was likely Ai generated, then I gave it a sentence it said to me 2 messages ago and it told me the sentence was likely human generated. So it’s not all there, but still very interesting
SCOOT! :)
@@trickster721 How is this any different to humans though? Its the generation that is the breathtaking part, you just saying all it does is predict words is silly. It has trillion of params so if al it does is predict at a highly accurate rate its much better then humans
@@milindusha Parameters are the saved connections between one word or phrase, and the word or phrase that should follow it. Parameters aren't neurons. Don't get me wrong, the technology is very impressive, but it has more in common with an internet search engine than a brain. It's not thinking, it's relaying the thoughts of the millions of people who wrote the training source text.
this is the sort of content that helps sell people on how useful AI learning is. I really like this project you took on.
You can look at the other way. Bad mobile games that once hired a few programmers and designers to create it might now become a one person job.
I am so amazed by the fact that the AI makes mistakes and is capable to actually understand its mistakes after you point it out. It is already so much like a human at this point... unbelievable.
ChatGPT is very humble and willing to admit mistakes. I wish all the people I work with were like this robot. 😂
Even if there's no mistakes still it admits that it was wrong 🥴 happened with me countless times
@@imranahmed1815also ChatGPT, apologies for the confusion, and then continue make another mistake
xd
chatgpt is like working with a coworker, but they help you get things done 6x faster
More like an intern since what you are doing is sending orders to someone who wants to learn and does not complain.
6x? more like 100x faster lol
Lol, in the time it took to write the prompts and consult with the thing you could have written all the code for this simple game twice
@@1individeo intern dont code like this, they will google it for hours and come back with doubts
@@benjamingriffith4991 how unless you download some GitHub repo and copy the code its not possible
That is really showing how much progress things have made so far, it's going to be interesting to see how things shake up the next few years with AI improvement
the video editing is so professional. I didn't realize it was made by a small channel! Great video. Also I'm making a game in rpg maker with the help of ai. Chatgpt for some small coding and story, Stable diffusion for Character sprites (faces)
I haven’t done much scripting in RPG Maker before. I’ll have to check it out
@@candlesan it actually don't have a script or coding it only involves "show text" for dialogues, "if else" for conditional, loops, show pictures and etc. It's not scripting it's just simple commands. but if you want to include coding, you'll need to use javascripts for plugins (usually use to manipulate, external and internal behavior of the game engine) and that's where ChatGPT comes in.
@@candlesan well I don't know any javascript. I only know the basics of python and java 😂.
And this is when i really love the TH-cam algorithm! Great video and super interesting results! :)
I really can't wait to see where AI gets us. And by all means: it can't get any worse than we humans are getting ourselves on our own already
Wow, this is incredible! Just by reading the title without watching the video, I decided to give it a try. I even asked it to create the assets for me, then refined them in Photoshop. Ten minutes later, I had a playable Flappy Bird game running. It's amazing to think about where we'll be in the next few years.
Very cool Wyatt! ChatGTP has been really fun to work with. Keep it up!
Heavily underrated video
That is exactly the conversation I had with my son yesterday. AI will enable us to focus on need instead of how. Design, problems, challenges, etc suddenly become the core of our work instead of finding the best code base, language or which coder should be doing the work. Great stuff, great video.
Trust me as a programmer, you still have to know how to program to be able to use this tool correctly. He may not have used any code he wrote himself but he knew what to write to get the correct prompts
…. It’s the future, do you think people wanted to go from a type writer to a computer keyboard? Change freaks people out but it also happens for a reason of forward progression. Humans since the beginning of time have always used their inventions to help with their lifestyle.
The original flappy bird the bird stays stationary and the background and scene move to the left like ChatGPT specified in the beginning, with this design you don't need to worry aboout some of the problems you had ChatGPT correct.. In unity I have built sidescrollers in the past and they are really fun, its good to know that ChatGPT can help as a tool so we can focus on more implementations and ideas to create a better game experience for the user going forward! Thanks for making this video
Great video! I’m glad your answer at the end was “not yet” 😂 You still have to be able to debug ChatGPT’s answers, which requires at least some knowledge of programming. We haven’t been made obsolete! (yet)
Watching this video makes me never wanna go to Software Engineering field.
This genuinely gives me hope for the gaming industry - perhaps upcoming AI breakthroughs will eventually enable developers to complete games prior to release! 🎮🤖
Developers who use AI will outpace those that don’t. It’s like having a pairing buddy 24/7 that does exactly what you need. Like having a second brain or a self driving car. Love it!
Everybody gangsta until _they_ become the second brain
@@thronosstudiosadapt
@@femiairboy94 Yeah, that's a no. Adapting to having AI do their takeover of the planet? No thanks.
You love it until you become that 2nd brain that will be jobless, and eventually that first brain will also be jobless cause guess what? That coworker can now lead a project...
im so happy for you that this video blew up so much. very wholesome co tent :)
This is exactly what I've been using gpt for and it's pretty awesome. Anything with coding language like web design etc it's super useful for. Glad you made this video I hope this helps more creators start making takes they may never have been able to otherwise 😊
Love the concept of just asking chatgpt questions after questions and it never gets tired of me!
Thank you! As an AI language model, I am designed to provide prompt and informative responses to your questions, and I never get tired or bored of interacting with you. So feel free to ask me anything you want!
Ive gotten ai to tellnme to switch the subject as it wasnt able to explain further
My gosh, what did I just observe. This is nuts! Great video!
I would really love some more videos on this topic. Experimenting with ChatGPT and it's capabilities in coding games
I love how GPT gives better answers after you correct them. I'm fiction writer and discussing ideas, references (myth, lore, etc.), and other works with ChatGPT is very fun. Maybe because it is very difficult to find a real person with same interest and knowledge in real life, and ChatGPT is always ready whenever you want.
.
ChatGPT always gives me new ideas or information, and then I can search for detail to other sources, it really saves my time. But I still find a lot of mistakes, especially when we discuss other popular works. And after you point out their mistakes, at least they will give you better and closer answer.
The main thing I enjoyed in this video is how polite the system was and how easily it fixed it's own mistake. What I wonder is if it learned from the mistake and would never skip those steps again?
Could you create 10 to 50 little bots, each one having its own responsibility in the code, like managing the architecture, implementing tickets, testing, etc, and finally communicating code changes with each others? I mean you see where this is going 😅
There’s a lot of hidden emergent intelligence to be found by creating layers of gpt designed to talk to each other, add memory and loops and that kinda thing and you’ve got a mind going. Upload it to a server with ridiculous amounts of memory and processing power, give it information to access some money, and tell it to make you more money, bam.
Nice idea, looks like many company is working on this projects, to see if it can work
@@jaredf6205That actually sounds like a great way to destroy the world. And it sounds scarily plausible thanks to corporate greed.
That's an insane idea. You could have 4 agents designing different functions and then one agent keeping an overview of the project and another to check that agent keeping an overview so that it doesn't make mistakes.
This is a really cool video idea. I love seeing people explore the value of AI like this. Is coding just going to be entirely done by AI in the future?
Well done!
People already cut and paste a lot of code at big companies. That will clearly continue. But people will choose WHAT the code does, and will still need to understand it at some level. For example, by creating new coding languages, designing the programs, training the AI, etc. Very similar to what the calculator did for accounting or what robotic manufacturing did for auto makers. Sure, lots of people’s jobs won’t be needed any more, but notice that no one would chose to go back to a time before calculators, for example. As an individual, you can choose to be the hammer or be the nail. It will be interesting to see what types of new jobs emerge to replace them.
Loved the video, straight to the point, consistent and fun, awesome job, you got yourself a sub ❤
I love how quick the new version is. So far it does such a better job at coding.
I use it for short code in languages I haven't learned yet. Usually it is great as I can just correct errors as we can somewhat understand languages we never used.
Very interesting, AI is evolving at huge speed. Great video!
Just found you. What an amazing idea to use chatgpt like this. You've earned a new sub :)
That is truly fascinating. I had only used it for rubber duck debugging. The code it gave me was wrong, but the back and forth dialogue got me to the correct answer, faster, which is neat.
Oh wow, I just realised that you’re Wyatt Cheng! I watched a great video that touched on your on stage comments at Blizzcon. I think it was Nakey Jakey? He made a really great point about how although what you said could have been said better, the alternative could end up being that we don’t have actual developers on stage anymore, and only have soulless PR people, so the community better start being more empathetic to developers, or it’s going to bite us in the behind. It really gave me a different view on the whole situation, and made me empathise with you so much more when I found the whole situation. You clearly did not mean it maliciously. I loved this video by the way. I knew AI would eventually get to this point, but I thought we were still quite a few years away from this level of growth. This year has seen a much larger jump than in the past, it seems.
Video popped out of nowhere but enjoyed watching this whole video! Awesome content! Excited to see what's in store for the future!
This is awesome! I've always wanted to make a game, but I've never had the time to really devote myself to learning to code. Having an AI be able to build the code just from my directions so I can focus on the art style, music and gameplay would be amazing
This is truly revolutionary 🔥
You won't be able to make a production game by having ChatGPT write your code
@@tonysodano I bet in the next 5 or 10 years there will be a complete game written by chat-gpt
Awesome video! You will surely blow up if you keep putting out content of this caliber. I'm astounded that you have such a small channel and that I get to be a part of your content creation journey. Best of luck.
Me in the future: I subbed to candlesan when he had less than 1k subs 😎
Thank you! If you have any topics you'd like to see covered next please let me know. My interests are in game design, game development, and the game industry in general.
What ChatGPT made me interested the most is that how good attitude it was. It is like someone I would like to work with and become friend :))
This is honestly amazing and inspiring. While Flappy Bird is obviously not the most advanced of modern games, the fact that it's possible for ChatGPT to code something like it gives us a hint about how much AI could help with game design in future. I can imagine a lot of indie developers really benefitting.
Yeah, good luck to them surviving in oversaturated market.
Indie developers will only benefit in the sense that coding itself will be easier. but it does not mean their work will actually be successful. If AI can do this for someone indie, imagine what it could do for a billion dollar company? It's going to be no different from today, only difference is it will be even harder for high-quality indie works to get the attention they deserve.
This is a con i don't see a lot of people acknowledge... If coding becomes something any random person can achieve with a robot, the market is going to become super saturated. This does not mean more people have a chance at getting their work out there. It means there will be too many games for the common person to shift through, so your work will be even LESS likely to garner any traction.
Indie developers benefit from people supporting their work first and foremost.
ChatGTP is indeed a great help. Especially if you require a piece of code that does something. For larger things it doesn't have enough memory per chat session. So you need to break things up and use a seperate chat session foreeach task.
What a lovely video I've watched today. Great job man!
I would love to see another video like this! Please make another one!
This is a super cool concept! I hope you can make a series with AI writing code for simple games.
I'm really glad you're using chatgpt 4 because it's so much more capable than the 3
I made gta 6 with chat gbt
😂😂
this is so awesome, Chat GPT seems to be like a human learning from their mistakes
also I just don't know why you have such few subscribers, your videos are neat :))
It doesn't actually learn anything permanently though. The next time someone tries to do this project with Chat GPT, it won't remember these mistakes. It will sorta be like starting from square one; but one way when AI becomes AGI and it can learn on it's own then its truly over for all of us haha
@@chrisstucker1813 Yeah lol, like it uses Reinforcement Learning, but it doesn't save it in its data, like imagine it does lol
@@MedAnimations yeah that’s it. I assumed that it learns everytime it gets something wrong so it won’t make the same mistake for the next person but I was wrong.
@@chrisstucker1813 I wish it will do so in the future
It also help diagnose patients too. I work in ED for a few years and last month my son tell me about chatgpt to i tried it in ed just inputing what the triage nurse assessment on pt and it give me all the questions to ask the patients (which some of them i even have not think of and very precise) and based on how pt is answered it would suggest what kind of further testing is required like which specific blood test or imaging test and if u follow it and input all the blood results or other data u will narrow down all the possible diagnosis. It just blow my mind away i don’t think they will be needing doctors in ed in near future.
Wow… an AI and a human fixing each other’s mistakes… I didn’t expect wholesome content
😂
Did you seriously copy/paste the top comment?
you forgot the !
That's so cool. I've often indulged in projects that required coding without me actually knowing how to code. Tutorials and easy modifications usually got me through but it would be awesome to actually ask chatgpt what specific code does and how to modify it my way
Great video, thanks!
My only comment is that, with the questions you ask ChatGPT, it seems to me you need to have a pretty good grasp of how to code a game in order to ask the right questions to generate the code.
Instead, could you rephrase some of your later questions with layman language? For example, when the score was incrementing before the bird had flown through the pillars, would would happen if you had simply asked "The score is incorrectly incrementing before the bird flies through the pillars. Can you please fix the code so that the score only increments once the bird has flown through?", rather than ask the question like a game developer and use references from the code?
Fun fact: ChatGPT wasn't originally made to talk to you, or play Chess, or tell you about the world. It was originally made to write and revise code, just like it's doing in this video!
Honestly it is refreshing to see someone using it for its intended purpose and getting great results!
It's quite interesting that there is a code tool that helps create new code tools
yay! this video is 7 months old which is like 200 years in AI development time. I use chatGPT at work now every day for at least an hour or two every day, it saves me SO MUCH TIME!!! Love this video, very well spoken and narrated to take all those steps down to a concise 7 minute video!
I knew I saw you before. Was wondering if it's you. This video was very fun. I just saw you also made a video about grind. To this date i remember your definition of what grind is.
I love it, this will be a time saver once it develops more.
Really interesting video, thanks. To my mind, this highlights the difference between a coder and an engineer. One follows instructions, the other defines (and refines) those instructions.
idk personally being able to crate so many things that normally would take weeks of tutorials and practice to achieve, now I can jump to any library language or framework and learn it as I go, by examining real code on an application I actually care about and with insane efficiency, idk about you but that is exciting, I feel that getting rid of the boring time consuming task of typing the commonly thousands of lines of code a developer would normally type during a project, have ai write them and then examine and correct the pre-existing code.. and to think that as we go the amount of trial responses are gonna need, it only makes me wonder how far ahead we gonna go to software development in the coming years, now that the hard part will be done automatically and developers will be able to devote time in actually thinking about the program and be able to test new modifications in hours if not minutes, I might be delusional but I'm happy with how things are going
This video made me feel secure in my job as a developer. The fact that you, as a developer, has to analyze the code and tell chatgpt exactly where it messed up, and what it needs to fix, confirms to me that until there is a programming model that actually understands the code it writes, you will always need a developer for all the hard stuff. This is essentially a pimped up version of the help and hints you already get from the IDE. Except that the IDE is usually more correct, because it too, analyzes your code.
Don't worry my friend AI will not replace as many things as you think. AI can only use existing knowledge, it doesn't innovate on the level of human creativity.
Humans can manifest from nothing, AI can't do that. It uses what's already there.
But can't you see that this will drastically reduce the number of developers required? Instead of a company needing 10 or w/e, now you just need 1 + ChatGPT. Whatever, this has happened in many industries throughout the years, but it could easily cause short term pain for developers.
Big thanks to the dev team for working so hard on the game we all love so much!
Keep up the good job 👏 👍 👌
absolutely insane video
i wasn't sure about chatgpt capabilities but now i realise how huge this is.
just wow.
you instantly got my subscription
nicely done !
Just wait till it takes your job, then u will be really impressed! haha
Amazing video
I also use ChatGPT to do the heavy lifting for my programming projects and I want to point something out to people here. This video skims very quickly over just how much work this process was. This project, even with ChatGPT, took hours. If not a couple days (depending). ChatGPT is great, but it is still a crapton of work. And sometimes, if you're a good software dev, its actually faster to just do it yourself. LLMs are not going to automate you out of a job. There is still A LOT of work you have to do even with ChatGPT.
I used ChatGPT to troubleshoot and debug a VR project and further develop it. I didn't even use GPT 4. Sometimes it is hard for it to understand my intentions and I usually needed to understand what the code does to correct it properly. But it was even better experience because I also learned a lot during the process. Can't wait to make my own projects using it.
You've definitely had better luck than I have so far. I've been trying to work through a coding project with GPT‐4 using a language called Processing (if you've ever programmed an arduino, processing is the language that the arduino code was based on). The code that GPT-4 produces has required a lot of syntax debugging. I'm not sure if it is due to using a version of Processing newer than GPT-4 is aware of or if GPT-4 doesn't have a lot of good content in its training data related to this language, but its bordering on being as much, if not more work than just writing the program myself from scratch. Its been fun tinkering with it though. I might try a more mainstream language like C++ next and see how that goes.
isnt coding in arduino done in C language?
@@yashupadhyay344 Yes, I believe so. I'll throw out a quick disclaimer that I am just a hobbyist and not an expert so I may not be completely correct, but I will explain as I understand it. From what I can tell, Processing is an open source IDE environment and a high level language syntax. It is designed to be able to run in different language modes that can be installed as plugins. By default Processing runs in Java mode. I presume that the base Processing language is effectively just a library written in the language of the language mode the IDE is set up for. Arduino adapted the Processing IDE and syntax structure for their own purposes, but I believe that Arduino syntax is a library written on top of one of the C family languages. It still retains a lot of similarity to the Processing syntax, but contains its own set of functions suited for the purposes it is used for. Coding in the Arduino language is a little bit different than coding in raw C though because unlike C where it has a main() function, Arduino uses setup() and loop() similar to Processing's setup() and draw(). I imagine that in the case of both Arduino and Processing, the underlying structure of the language they are using is still there, but a bit of it exists under the hood so to speak so that you can just focus on the abstracted high level syntax. The current versions of the Arduino and Processing IDEs look a bit different from one another now, but older versions looked nearly identical to each other.
@anekroth there is still a main.cpp in the arduino. Arduino does run on straight C. It's just hidden away in the IDE.
It calls setup, then runs thru the loop function, and checking the serial if it's enabled
#include
int main(void)
{ init();
#if defined(USBCON)
USBDevice.attach();
#endif
setup();
for (;;) {
loop();
if (serialEventRun) serialEventRun();
}
return 0; }
@@anekroth oh thanks, i was unaware of Processing
@@theboot100 exactly, back in highschool(2 yrs ago, freshman to be precise) we learnt like that only
Honestly as a writer whose dabbled in coding but never been particularly good at it this might enable me to work on my own game ideas in the future. At the bare minimum even if it just allows a working concept to attract others to the project.
The most amazing thing in this video is how the author articulates what he wants, a lot depends on the wording.
Love the video! Amazing to see what AI can do with human help. Any chance you can post the conversation with ChatGPT with it's code and responses? Would love to see a full view of how it works and how you got it to do what you needed! Excited for the next video of this :D
It’s not any help. People using AI to throw people out of work. AI is a form of unemployment for humans (even today!)
This is actually really scary and it's just in its infancy. Feels like we have just crossed a milestone one step closer to Robopocalypse.
Definitely amazing for sure, but looks like it's still in the first stages. I'd imagine it will take another decade at the least for features like this to actually become official. I can see a lot of issues that would come up with using this for a more large scale project so it wouldn't be worth using. With that said tho, it's still a great tool for programming for sure, or for someone that is trying to learn programming.
the fact this is the very beginning is startling. I used chatgpt to create a templete for a website and it did a damn good job.
waiting for GPT-5, expecting it can help to reduce manual writing and can start guessing our mindset 😄
GPT-5 will just say “forget your stupid bird, here’s code for a game that will make you $100 million within a year”.
@magicmulder GPT-5 will be able to code the entirety of GTA 6 before GTA 6 even releases😂
Damn, this is awesome. ChatGPT is that smart friend who can do the hard work for you and you just copy and paste the code lol. This chatgpt AI is really awesome in the way you communicate your problem to it and it understands.
Great job 👏🏻 i guess people will wish to see more examples like this 5 millions watched. Maybe some longer version so people like me could try replicate and learn 👍🏻
As a web dev, I tried the grueling game dev with AI
It's still not easy
that was such a lovely video from start to finish, thank you very much !