My classical piano setup is Pianoteq with a Yamaha CF50 as the keyboard. If your hardware keyboard doesn't feel like a piano, you can't play it like a piano, and the difference is audible. As for the vst, anything with samples feel like playing a tape recorder. Played one note at a time, sometimes sampled pianos sound better, but playing more than one note just doesn't feel like playing a single unified piano.
Thanks for the insight on your set up! We wanted to make something with an emphasis on colouring scores and music, so it’s interesting seeing the different approaches!
I just use Keyscape for pianos. It’s very realistic because it has adequate velocity layers and the Spectrasonics folks did an immaculate job matching all the samples and provide the user control over the sound.
While I support Christian and Crow Hill, wish them well, and is looking forward to their products, I still have to say I don't really agree with the premise. There ARE really great moldable and dynamic pianos out there already. Take a look at Garritan CFX, Native Instruments Noire, Fracture Sounds' various pianos, Spectrasonics' Keyscape, and also the most moldable one: Pianoteq. And there are more out there in fact. The problem, according to myself, is mostly the actual keyboard and its weighted keys. Nice idea for a video though and so far I enjoy the instruments you are coming up with. Cheers!
I wonder how much we have been conditioned to hear sampled/digital pianos and now believe that they are what pianos really sound like? I think a lot of pianists play so much on digital instruments that they are missing the difference.
I couldn't agree more. The biggest problem is always the controller. I remember a few years ago I was working with a pianist - I'm a pianist too but also a mixing engineer - and he delivered me some of the most beautiful piano recordings I've ever heard, to the point I was convinced it was a real instrument. Well, it wasn't, it was a Galaxy Vintage D Piano, played through Kawaii VPC01 (which has a dedicated curve for that VST) and it was mind-blowing. Having said that, Christian performance in this video is amazing, and very realistic, maybe the secret is that he designed The Vertical Piano to respond well to the LMK4+? 😂
Funny, I was just thinking about this subject earlier today. Because when I've recorded live piano it always has this life that sample piano's just don't have. Which is kind of strange considering how one would think a piano should be a relatively straight forward instrument to sample. And I think it mainly comes down to a couple of thing: 1. Natural resonance in the instrument, especially when you play with big differences in dynamics(like quickly going from very soft to very loud, the instrument reacts differently than samples do). 2. How when you play the same note repeatedly(especially while holding the sustain pedal down), a real piano usually resonates/reacts/sounds different from a sampled piano. 3. How playing multiple notes together affects the overall sound(which simply doesn't happen with samples, where every note is sampled individually). 4. How sampled pianos are typically recorded and engineered in such a way that they sound much too sterile and clean(sure, there are exceptions, like the Vertical Piano), while recording live piano often gives me a lot more character. Perhaps 1-3 are all pretty much about the same thing, the natural resonance response in the instrument, that is not translated when playing static samples(even with all the velocity layers and round robins in the world), or maybe there is more to it than just resonance.
The strings also vibrate differently when played soft vs loud; the tone is gonna change. With sampled pianos (cheap ones at least) it might be just one sample for each key which just won't sound right.
@@heikkiaho6605 Most sampled pianos have multiple velocity layers. But there is something lost in how the notes affect each other, when playing multiple notes at the same time, or even just playing the same note repeatedly with the sustain pedal held down(so that the tones overlap each other).
@@HiteshCeon That's called sympathetic resonance. Keys that are being held down allow the strings to resonate in a different way in response to other strings compared to those that have been lifted up. If you play a C, let it die down (without lifting the key) and then play an A next to it, the A will sound different than if you had lifted the C up. This is easy to mimic in a modeled piano like Pianoteq but very difficult to do with a sampled instrument.
@@anttihuovilainen1653 Yes, well, samples also have sympathetic resonance from the other strings, but baked into each individual note/sample so missing the interplay of the resonances between the different strings as you play the keyboard, or use the pedals. And there is more to it than just the resonance of the strings, there is resonance in the wood and other parts of the piano itself… which can’t be fully emulated with samples. Pianoteq is amazing, and has improved a lot over the years, it is by far the most fun virtual piano to play because of its responsiveness and sensitivity, but I always felt like it missed something in terms of the character of the sound. On the other hand you have instruments like Keyscape which have a great character but not the same responsive feel that Pianoteq has…
Keyscape and Acoustic Samples C7 Grand are the most realistic piano libraries I've played. I have spent hundreds of hours on a real Yamaha C7 and when I play the sampled version, it literally tricks my brain into thinking I'm hearing (a great recording) of the real thing.
Why I use Pianoteq? Dynamics. I can set it how ever I want. I can always squash it later with compressor, but I want dynamics when I record. Sampled pianos always lack that. Pianoteq is an instrument. Sampled piano is a sampled instrument.
Yeah I gave up on playing sampled piano libraries after I started using Pianoteq. I've owned it ever since version 1 and it just gets better and better with each revision. From the very beginning, Pianoteq always responded and played like a real instrument. Version 1 sounded thin and artificial compared to the sound of a sampled piano library, but it was so much more enjoyable to play. Now it's on version 8 the sound has finally caught up with the playability. The piano models sound so exquisite, especially the Steinway D.
Exactly. The way I describe it is that playing a sampled piano feels like playing a tape recorder. For me nothing has got close to Pianoteq, which I've been using since v3.
Every Pianoteq user says the same thing. So do I... When you try Pianoteq (the sound of version 8 is really good), you find every sampled piano a bit flat and lacking of life. Some expensive ones have a better and more flattering sound than Pianoteq, but you can't tweak them exactly like you want, make your sound...
I have spent ages crafting my own piano setup on my DAW so i can use it across a wide range of music styles. It consists of four midi tracks and two return channels. 1) Grand piano setting in Ableton live. 2) American Grand vst Arturia anolog lab V 3) German Gand vst Arturia anolog lab V 4) Savoy piano vst Arturia anolog lab 4 A return track with reverb and one with delay. Track one's piano i use the full range of the keys, track two is for the bottom half of the keys eq. For a boost on bass, track three for the top half eq. for highs and track 4 is eq. Egressively for that mid range punch. My reverb is eq. To roll off all the low end and the delay is just there in the background and peters of quickly.
The whole vibrating and resonating of all the parts of a vertical piano, let alone a grand piano, and the whole interference of all those vibrations can never be reproduced by whatever speaker system. Also the tuning can be very delicately different from pure equal tempered adding a lot of character and specific blending. And then the touch of the keys and the whole key mechanism. Forget it, you'll never get there...
I think part of the issue is how MIDI velocity works. Its not measuring dynamics at all, its effectively measuring the speed between two switches. Plus, it doesn't matter how good or bad your technique is - someone else has gone through and played all the keys before you did. You're playing someone else's performance
If two different people sit down and play the same real piano one after the other, the piano is going to sound different, because, well, the players are human, and their fingers have different strengths and weaknesses and their own character. And the same is true if they play a midi keyboard with sampled or modeled sounds, or both. So, it seems to me your argument that you are "playing someone else's performance" is moot. There is no one such thing as the "real thing" anyway, and different players playing the same samples on different or even the same keyboards are going to sound different. In the end, it matters not if notes of a real or virtual piano are recorded or played back "realistically", it only matters if the end result moves people (and especially you) emotionally when you play it. Seems like a lot of commenters here are losing sight of that. Edit: I just realized that my reply to your comment applies generally to the thesis of this video, so I'm going to repeat it as its own comment up above.
The fundamental problem seems to me not to be the dynamics, but the fact that the strings of a piano interact with each other through resonances, a feature that most other instruments just lack. If you would want to capture that with samples you’d need different samples per combination of struck strings, which is of course not feasible do do in a generalized way since there are millions of possible combinations, especially if you also consider the cases where the player does not hit the keys as block chords but some frequencies are already decaying when new frequencies come in. That is why physical modeling has really got an edge over sampling if it involves pianos.
Around 1999 I started listening to this Icelandic group Múm. That was the first time I ever heard a woman sing like that. Every time I meet a client who’s fond of Billie Eilish I tell them about Múm. Nita has a lovely voice as well, and it so reminded me of that style. Anyway, thanks for the video and I'm interested to hear the final product and your feelings about the piano software.
Hi Christian, I'm a (mostly elec.) guitar player and your videos fascinate me. I am the guy in the band who generally will say I hate the sound of sampled pianos but of course we all get why they are popular for the gigging musician. The same things are true for me with modeled amps verses tube amps. The experience of playing through a great tube amp will never be fully replicated by modeling amps. I think the same is true for piano sampling but I must say the samples you create sound great and fulfill the practical needs better than most of what I've heard and have their place in the creative world.
Logic Stock Piano for me. Always got that up, just to tickle some ideas/sketches mostly. If using it for the 'final', I'd recommend more reverb/eq-ing, saturating on it.. But other than that, it just works. Yes, a 'workhorse'. ..I don't want it to do anything else. 😅🤣
I really liked that cover track you were laying down. I have never heard that song before. I loved how the chords moved. I would be really interested in hearing your final version, is there a link? And please turn up the singer's volume level just a bit.
I understand that you’re trying to sell a product and therefore want to create the idea you’ve got something special to offer, which is fine. But the things you’re saying about other products on the market can at best be described as an ‘opinion’, but calling it misleading would probably be more accurate. We’ve progressed far beyond the Korg M1 piano sound you show a small clip of. There are quite a few options on the market that offer great dynamic range with many sample layers, offering a realistic sound with smooth transition from the softest to the loudest played parts. Also ‘less perfect’ pianos with ‘character’ can be found in many libraries. So your piano offering these features is fine, but not really unique. Ironically your demonstration of your piano sound in this video, although okay sounding, didn’t demonstrate that ‘great dynamic range’ you claim is missing in other libraries at all. 😅
Thank you for your feedback, we appreciate you watching it so keenly! It’s true that we do stand on the shoulders of giants, that’s why we’re dedicating ourselves to keep the progression moving to a shiny new future 😊
@@TheCrowHillCoThank’s for your reply. To be clear, I’m not saying your product isn’t any good or anything like that, but I do appreciate honest marketing. Keep up the good work!
This is funny coming from the creator of the 400$ Hans Zimmer Piano library lol (just kidding, I really appreciate everything you do for composers, Christian).
The biggest problems for me with sampled pianos I face as a mastering engineer is that they cannot provide phase coherence at the bottom end. A sampled piano note played with another sampled piano note below Middle C is *NOT REMOTELY* the same as the sound of both notes being played together. With two sampled notes together, the phase intreractions cause comb filtering of the low end. I'm sure this is why piano sample libraries always have over-hyped stereo - they sound great in stereo. Try summing them to mono and hear all the low end of notes disappear with random gay abandon.
I''ve written and played all styles from pop, jazz, Afro-Latin to classical. Obviously I prefer a real instrument where possible but there are situations where that isn't possible or desirable from a production perspective. The solution for me for years now has been Pianoteq. Modelled I appreciate, but actually better sounding than most sampled instruments and far more flexible. I'd add a little production trick of my own. Whatever you use, play the other instrument tracks in a room with an actual piano and close mic and record the cavity for use as a subtle reverb. Pianos, especially concert grands, resonate and sing with the other instruments and this can have the effect of somehow putting them all in the same space. It's a very slight difference but once you try it you'll notice it.
Hey Christian, great video as always! Quick question: could you do a video in which you explain why you're switching to cubase? I've heard you mention it several times now. I've been using Logic for a long time, and don't really have issues with it - I'm curious as to what the advantage to switching would be...
I can't believe I just found this channel. I am obsessed with your Fly on the Wall studio session video. Very talented and thank you for sharing your knowledge and life.
Stina nordestam is a singing goddess! her work with David Sylvian is amazing, for new listeners, check out her track on the Romeo and Juliet Movie soundtrack and her video and track Dynamite,
I find that the sampled pianos I like the most are not the most clear 'upfront' straighforward pianos. I prefer the ones that are processed or have a strange character. Then you embrace the fact that sampled pianos are different to real pianos. I still love Noire the most. My second favourite is the Westwood Alt Piano. And I've been enjoying UVI's Austrian Grand and Modern D. For a _slightly_ brighter sound, I like Native Instrument's Claire. Some on my wantlist are Meyer's Postfelt, and SRM Max Richter sounds gorgeous. At the other extreme, I wouldn't snobbily knock the good old Korg M1 forte 'piano' too, it has it's use, it's all over so many great classic House tracks. Yamaha DX 'pianos' can be lovely in their own right too. As are basic synthesised pianos from analogue synths like the Roland JX-8P/JX-3P. The VI labs Model D & Upright are very good for more straight ahead well-recorded pianos, but they aren't really my style.
Hi there Christian (and fellow viewers)! If you could recommend a digital midi/piano/keyboard to a classical pianist looking to record digitally which one would it be ? So far I have my eyes on. Any tips from you or your viewers are most appreciated: - Doepfer LMK4+ - Roland FP-30X - Studiologic SL88 Grand Ps. The sounds themselves are not important only the keybed/action is as we will be using PianoTeq 8 to record.
Your piano part reminded me of Ben Folds. Great sounding piano! I suspect one of the great difficulties in creating a real souilful, responsive sampled piano is that it's virtually impossible to capture how different notes (when played as a chord) interact rather uniquely with the space around them inside a room
That Bflat 3 bass octave is lovely and rich you can pick out the purity of those ringing bass strings I too love pianos aswell always has been old piano their tone aswell and each unison tuning between the trichord strings you every so slightly hear that wonderful marble sound in the tuning in the mid to high range especially when you use it dynamically you hear the action and feel the vibrations love the samples you’ve made ❤
My late mother was born in the Philippines during the war and later became a piano teacher:-) Perhaps she heard a piano like this as a small child.... I find it very exciting that you sample instruments with history and thus make them accessible to others. The instruments that sound most real to me are sampled instruments whose acoustic, analogue counterpart I can't play or whose real sound I've never heard in a room. But with well-known instruments such as violins, pianos, guitars, flutes, etc., sampled instruments are simply imitations. They don't have the resonances, the dynamics or all the little quirks that acoustic instruments have. An exciting approach is certainly not to imitate the sound of the real instrument but that of a proper recording. And a beautifully sampled piano in a DAW is still much better than no piano at all🙂
My father says, "Your mother's right, she's really up on things. Before we married, Mommy served in the WACS in the Philippines." Now, I had heard the WACs recruited old maids for the war. But mommy isn't one of those, I've known her all these years. ;)
Nice work. My favourite to play and compose on is a custom preset made on the Nord Grand, from one of their uprights and a layered sample. While on paper a software instrument sound be better, I haven't sound that realism elsewhere. I like a piano sound with character.
with all due respect, my problem and growing concern with Christian's videos is that he brings a special level of intelligent charm and wit to the game that means he could convice us about ANYTHING and that's a bit scary to be honest. i would not like to buy into the reasoning that all my pianobook/spitfire/etc libraries are not good enough suddenly now and we have to buy this crow hill stuff. which is superb i'm sure of that. its just the over the top kind of reasoning that boggles me a bit.
I was lucky to be one of the few to get to use that before it went live and review it. It is a good piano instrument with a lot to it though I still currently prefer my Noire piano.
My go to favourite sampled piano is Native Instruments Alicia’s Keys. Sits well in a mix, lots of character - must have been using it for 10 years and find it very inspiring.
@@apaivab , as are a lot of people's other favorite piano samples over the years! There is something to be said for doing one thing very well and simply!
One of my favs is Skybox audios Obscura Grand. It's not perfect by any stretch but it has a vibe. All I really want is something like what you'd hear on an Olivia Dean album. The Vertical Piano is probably pretty close to that up-close indie singer-songwriter sound but I'm afraid I'll buy it and be disappointed - and at that price the disappointment will be amplified. I do still appreciate the work you're doing though👍
Oo-er, contentious! Out of interest, when you use a studio piano, is it you playing or do you get a player in? Like any instrument, including electronic, a majority of the resulting racket is down to the player. Give a guitarist Eric Clapton’s guitar and it still sounds like the other player. This is a fun post and I’m looking forward to hearing the finished article. 🙏
Stina - she was one of the most interesting songwriters of the 90s - never toured as far as I'm aware. Seems to have retired 15-20 years ago, but left some great albums behind ('And She Closed her Eyes', and 'Dynamite', particularly.)
Thanks, Christian, but I think it's not there yet. It sounds very much like a sampled piano. Maybe the limitation is in the technology itself. Plugin-wise, Acustica has pointed in a different technological direction and it feels wayyy better to me than any other emulation, more 3D, very flattering to the sound source just as (or almost) the hardware counterparts do sound. I'm hopping MIDI 2.0 and more velocity layers will help... But then the amount of Gb per library will be ridiculous, so I think some kind of smart interpolation between sampled layers will be key. Will IK Multimedia come out with a MODO piano someday? That could be interesting too. New solutions for old problems... One day!
I was wondering when the first mention of Marmite on this channel would occur! To overcome the "stiffness" of sampled pianos I usually layer at least 2/3 together, and very often I get some very interesting sounding "side effects"
I'm generally against AI when it's doing the work for us, but it seems to me that machine learning trained on a bunch of excellent piano compositions, plus some onboard samples to seed the plugin would make for an excellent simulation. That said, that's a very nice piano plugin
We were made to calculate the amount of processing and memory needed to truly sample a piano, just to prove that computers quickly run out of resources once adding the cross-mod, and resonances happening between a few notes in a body.
Using a software piano in a live situation is completely different from using it in the studio. I have spent too many hours experimenting with layers, mono samples and carefully contoured velocity-switch points that sound great at home but as soon as they're run through even high-end P.A. systems sound flat, out of phase, brittle, or all of the above. Does anyone know if Pianoteq can cut it live? Does it have the range from quiet warmth to percussive attack needed to match the dynamic range of a good grand piano on stage? I'd love to hear about people's experience using it.
I still miss the character marked by the resonances within each piano. Hitting a note will always trigger other piano snares to resonate with it. This can be captured by sampling. However, hitting a chord will have those notes amplifying the resonances within the piano and cancelling others. And while you can sample one note, it would be extremely hard to say the least to capture every combination of notes within a piano and the different resonances that specific combination will produce within the piano, especially when those chords wiĺ be sustained within the next chord. Etc.
Why are you switching to Cubase? I used to use that back in the Atari days and then on the earlier Macs but then moved to Logic as soon as it came out. Don't think I could switch again now unless I absolutely had to so wondering what your reason for swapping is?
I’d love to hear about that too because I bought C13 with the same intention and love the feature set, but am really struggling with the UI and workflow. Logic feels so much cleaner and more elegant. I’m not sure what to do.
What do you think about the possibilities of modelling instruments, Chris? The SWAM instruments are looking really interesting and Moore's law should make this an ever more convincing (sample beating?) approach in the very near future.
Most of the NI pianos are lovely especially Noire and Una Corda / the pianos that Fracture Sounds have produced are simply brilliant and the best in class.
I have unfortunately never had the chance to play a midi masterkeyboard with a velocity curve that felt natural to me but some sampled pianos manage to compensate somehow, in that those occassional (no idea how to spell that) way too loud or soft notes sound like bold musical choices instead of just spastic playing
This is only my personal opinion so, anyone who loves sampled piano’s please ignore my following comment. I think certain “real” instruments are much more alive when you use acoustic modelling. I’ve used Pianoteq for years and it feel much more alive than any sampled piano I’ve ever heard. I’m not saying that there aren’t sampled piano’s that aren’t good or great but if you’re looking for a pristine piano(e.g. a Steinway), a product like Pianoteq is (in my mind) unbeatable. For those special “character” piano’s, sampling is great.
I've tried Pianoteq and it's obviously now in my shopping list. The product sound fantastic. As soon I'll have the money... But I think we need the 3 things. The sampled ones, the modelized ones and, if we can (not easy), the real ones.
I often wondered why the Sample Library Builders never use a resonating layer that remembers previous keys touched, so they can make this subtle '3D' wash of resonating strings and wood. A note by note sample can't do that, while a real piano plays as a whole. Maybe it would work to capture how chords resonate and intermix as sums of sines. Can't explain it, but sampled pianos are 'empty'.
Well, you are concentrating on the dynamics (vertical) but not considering the harmonic interaction (horizontal) dimensions of the piano. Any piano is a complex harmonic whole of the notes played, sustained with the sympathetic resonances and harmonies of the other strings and frame of the piano. Sampling one note at a time and replaying it cannot capture those interactions, since they are constantly changing and evolving in myriad ways. So you have a set of static photographs of the instrument and not an organic whole which is a complex sum of a harmonic system. It is a living, breathing thing, which incidentally does not conform to the tempered musical compromise we are so used to. So i don't see how it is possible to recreate that. This is true of many instruments and ensembles. Sure we can imitate them with varying degrees of success, but they will never be the same thing. That is not a bad thing, it is a good argument for the richness of human beings playing physical instruments which never issue streams of identical notes, as samplers do.
I use Una Corda but as a layer. It's a single string piano with great resonances so it works extremely well in adding the nuance against a lot of sampled pianos. I have a Roland GX 700 with the V-Piano supernatural module intstalled. It lifts the pianos. I also use with several Pianobook libraries to add the 'air' and resonace to those too.
@@allankeenmusic gotcha... I do the opposite, I use alone but I degrade it even more. usually play it at 2 to 3 octaves higher than I want it then I run it through half time and more tape saturation. Sometimes I would layer it as well with post card piano from teletone audio. It's sampled based also. Guess I like sampled based pianos because I don't try to get a realistic sound from them.
If two different people sit down and play the same real piano one after the other, the piano is going to sound different, because, well, the players are human, and their fingers have different strengths and weaknesses and their own character. And the same is true if they play a midi keyboard with sampled or modeled sounds, or both. So, it seems to me whether the recorded sounds sound "real" is moot. There is no one such thing as the "real thing" anyway, as different players playing the same samples on different or even the same midi keyboards or play on the same real pianos, are going to sound different. In the end, it matters not if notes of a real or virtual piano are recorded or played back "realistically", it only matters if the end result moves people emotionally when you play it. Seems like a lot of commenters here are losing sight of that. That being said, I love the idea behind Crow Hill, even if I haven't purchased many of their products because I simply can't afford to buy many more plugins unless there is a compelling reason to do so.
Christian, I think sampled pianos suffer from the same problems as sampled guitars. Those hammered and plucked strings produce complex harmonics. Trying to capture those tricky things is hard enough but when you throw in the fact that each action produces subtly different harmonics each time and you have a considerable challenge on your hands.
I use Chroma (Sonuscore), EZKeys (Toontrack), Alt Piano (Westwood), Lo•Ki (Sonuscore). I love each of these for their own reasons. I did have to set them up quite a bit to perform how they need to, but they can do it.
I find sampled pianos fine for songs with plenty of other elements but I think if recoding something sparse you really need to capture a performance on the real instrument
The sampled pianos nowadays are MORE than sufficient for EDM producers, also there is nothing wrong with making edm music if you are into that type of thing.
Fortunately MIDI 2.0 will help out the already released libraries a lot, not to speak about the coming modeling emulations by Pianoteq and others… Also, main problem are the piano players: to be pianist means to play as God commands. And that takes some training years. Finally, hardware matters: nothing still compares to a good Blüthner or Steinweg keybed, feeling the vibrations under the keys, pedals, etc. Not even talking here about the speakers that are far beyond the acoustics involved in this matter… nevertheless, let’s think that I’m about 10 years from now the digital to analog world will feel like those olden rachmaninoff times for us…
My classical piano setup is Pianoteq with a Yamaha CF50 as the keyboard. If your hardware keyboard doesn't feel like a piano, you can't play it like a piano, and the difference is audible. As for the vst, anything with samples feel like playing a tape recorder. Played one note at a time, sometimes sampled pianos sound better, but playing more than one note just doesn't feel like playing a single unified piano.
Thanks for the insight on your set up! We wanted to make something with an emphasis on colouring scores and music, so it’s interesting seeing the different approaches!
I just use Keyscape for pianos. It’s very realistic because it has adequate velocity layers and the Spectrasonics folks did an immaculate job matching all the samples and provide the user control over the sound.
While I support Christian and Crow Hill, wish them well, and is looking forward to their products, I still have to say I don't really agree with the premise. There ARE really great moldable and dynamic pianos out there already. Take a look at Garritan CFX, Native Instruments Noire, Fracture Sounds' various pianos, Spectrasonics' Keyscape, and also the most moldable one: Pianoteq. And there are more out there in fact. The problem, according to myself, is mostly the actual keyboard and its weighted keys.
Nice idea for a video though and so far I enjoy the instruments you are coming up with.
Cheers!
I wonder how much we have been conditioned to hear sampled/digital pianos and now believe that they are what pianos really sound like? I think a lot of pianists play so much on digital instruments that they are missing the difference.
Yeah but if you're in the business of competing with those pianos, you're gonna downplay them.
I couldn't agree more. The biggest problem is always the controller. I remember a few years ago I was working with a pianist - I'm a pianist too but also a mixing engineer - and he delivered me some of the most beautiful piano recordings I've ever heard, to the point I was convinced it was a real instrument. Well, it wasn't, it was a Galaxy Vintage D Piano, played through Kawaii VPC01 (which has a dedicated curve for that VST) and it was mind-blowing. Having said that, Christian performance in this video is amazing, and very realistic, maybe the secret is that he designed The Vertical Piano to respond well to the LMK4+? 😂
Funny, I was just thinking about this subject earlier today. Because when I've recorded live piano it always has this life that sample piano's just don't have. Which is kind of strange considering how one would think a piano should be a relatively straight forward instrument to sample.
And I think it mainly comes down to a couple of thing:
1. Natural resonance in the instrument, especially when you play with big differences in dynamics(like quickly going from very soft to very loud, the instrument reacts differently than samples do).
2. How when you play the same note repeatedly(especially while holding the sustain pedal down), a real piano usually resonates/reacts/sounds different from a sampled piano.
3. How playing multiple notes together affects the overall sound(which simply doesn't happen with samples, where every note is sampled individually).
4. How sampled pianos are typically recorded and engineered in such a way that they sound much too sterile and clean(sure, there are exceptions, like the Vertical Piano), while recording live piano often gives me a lot more character.
Perhaps 1-3 are all pretty much about the same thing, the natural resonance response in the instrument, that is not translated when playing static samples(even with all the velocity layers and round robins in the world), or maybe there is more to it than just resonance.
The strings also vibrate differently when played soft vs loud; the tone is gonna change. With sampled pianos (cheap ones at least) it might be just one sample for each key which just won't sound right.
@@heikkiaho6605 Most sampled pianos have multiple velocity layers. But there is something lost in how the notes affect each other, when playing multiple notes at the same time, or even just playing the same note repeatedly with the sustain pedal held down(so that the tones overlap each other).
@@HiteshCeon oh, right 🤔
@@HiteshCeon That's called sympathetic resonance. Keys that are being held down allow the strings to resonate in a different way in response to other strings compared to those that have been lifted up. If you play a C, let it die down (without lifting the key) and then play an A next to it, the A will sound different than if you had lifted the C up. This is easy to mimic in a modeled piano like Pianoteq but very difficult to do with a sampled instrument.
@@anttihuovilainen1653 Yes, well, samples also have sympathetic resonance from the other strings, but baked into each individual note/sample so missing the interplay of the resonances between the different strings as you play the keyboard, or use the pedals. And there is more to it than just the resonance of the strings, there is resonance in the wood and other parts of the piano itself… which can’t be fully emulated with samples.
Pianoteq is amazing, and has improved a lot over the years, it is by far the most fun virtual piano to play because of its responsiveness and sensitivity, but I always felt like it missed something in terms of the character of the sound.
On the other hand you have instruments like Keyscape which have a great character but not the same responsive feel that Pianoteq has…
Keyscape and Acoustic Samples C7 Grand are the most realistic piano libraries I've played. I have spent hundreds of hours on a real Yamaha C7 and when I play the sampled version, it literally tricks my brain into thinking I'm hearing (a great recording) of the real thing.
Keyscape is great, the only downside is that the background noise is multiplied by the amount of keys pressed at the same time
U did not detected the delay ?? even if you correct it there´s still delay.
Keyscape doesn't do resonances though, right?
Teletone Audio and Midiwoods Blünther are also great.
Will check these out!
Why I use Pianoteq? Dynamics. I can set it how ever I want. I can always squash it later with compressor, but I want dynamics when I record. Sampled pianos always lack that. Pianoteq is an instrument. Sampled piano is a sampled instrument.
Yeah I gave up on playing sampled piano libraries after I started using Pianoteq. I've owned it ever since version 1 and it just gets better and better with each revision. From the very beginning, Pianoteq always responded and played like a real instrument. Version 1 sounded thin and artificial compared to the sound of a sampled piano library, but it was so much more enjoyable to play. Now it's on version 8 the sound has finally caught up with the playability. The piano models sound so exquisite, especially the Steinway D.
Exactly. The way I describe it is that playing a sampled piano feels like playing a tape recorder. For me nothing has got close to Pianoteq, which I've been using since v3.
same. it has issues, but unlike the rest.
Same here! Pianoteq ruined all sampler pianos for me 😂 it's awesome
Every Pianoteq user says the same thing. So do I... When you try Pianoteq (the sound of version 8 is really good), you find every sampled piano a bit flat and lacking of life. Some expensive ones have a better and more flattering sound than Pianoteq, but you can't tweak them exactly like you want, make your sound...
I have spent ages crafting my own piano setup on my DAW so i can use it across a wide range of music styles.
It consists of four midi tracks and two return channels.
1) Grand piano setting in Ableton live.
2) American Grand vst
Arturia anolog lab V
3) German Gand vst Arturia anolog lab V
4) Savoy piano vst Arturia anolog lab 4
A return track with reverb and one with delay.
Track one's piano i use the full range of the keys, track two is for the bottom half of the keys eq. For a boost on bass, track three for the top half eq. for highs and track 4 is eq. Egressively for that mid range punch.
My reverb is eq. To roll off all the low end and the delay is just there in the background and peters of quickly.
The whole vibrating and resonating of all the parts of a vertical piano, let alone a grand piano, and the whole interference of all those vibrations can never be reproduced by whatever speaker system. Also the tuning can be very delicately different from pure equal tempered adding a lot of character and specific blending. And then the touch of the keys and the whole key mechanism. Forget it, you'll never get there...
I think part of the issue is how MIDI velocity works. Its not measuring dynamics at all, its effectively measuring the speed between two switches. Plus, it doesn't matter how good or bad your technique is - someone else has gone through and played all the keys before you did. You're playing someone else's performance
If two different people sit down and play the same real piano one after the other, the piano is going to sound different, because, well, the players are human, and their fingers have different strengths and weaknesses and their own character. And the same is true if they play a midi keyboard with sampled or modeled sounds, or both. So, it seems to me your argument that you are "playing someone else's performance" is moot. There is no one such thing as the "real thing" anyway, and different players playing the same samples on different or even the same keyboards are going to sound different.
In the end, it matters not if notes of a real or virtual piano are recorded or played back "realistically", it only matters if the end result moves people (and especially you) emotionally when you play it. Seems like a lot of commenters here are losing sight of that.
Edit: I just realized that my reply to your comment applies generally to the thesis of this video, so I'm going to repeat it as its own comment up above.
The shed's looking a little bare but you're looking happier and healthy in this video which is good. Keep at it!
The fundamental problem seems to me not to be the dynamics, but the fact that the strings of a piano interact with each other through resonances, a feature that most other instruments just lack. If you would want to capture that with samples you’d need different samples per combination of struck strings, which is of course not feasible do do in a generalized way since there are millions of possible combinations, especially if you also consider the cases where the player does not hit the keys as block chords but some frequencies are already decaying when new frequencies come in. That is why physical modeling has really got an edge over sampling if it involves pianos.
Well, yeah, but even lower tier digital pianos from all the major companies have pretty good resonance engines these days
Around 1999 I started listening to this Icelandic group Múm. That was the first time I ever heard a woman sing like that. Every time I meet a client who’s fond of Billie Eilish I tell them about Múm. Nita has a lovely voice as well, and it so reminded me of that style. Anyway, thanks for the video and I'm interested to hear the final product and your feelings about the piano software.
Mùm are the best. Still listen to their old albums now. So beautiful and so relaxing. Saw them a few times in London. Great fun live
Hi Christian, I'm a (mostly elec.) guitar player and your videos fascinate me. I am the guy in the band who generally will say I hate the sound of sampled pianos but of course we all get why they are popular for the gigging musician. The same things are true for me with modeled amps verses tube amps. The experience of playing through a great tube amp will never be fully replicated by modeling amps. I think the same is true for piano sampling but I must say the samples you create sound great and fulfill the practical needs better than most of what I've heard and have their place in the creative world.
Logic Stock Piano for me. Always got that up, just to tickle some ideas/sketches mostly. If using it for the 'final', I'd recommend more reverb/eq-ing, saturating on it.. But other than that, it just works. Yes, a 'workhorse'. ..I don't want it to do anything else. 😅🤣
I really liked that cover track you were laying down. I have never heard that song before. I loved how the chords moved. I would be really interested in hearing your final version, is there a link? And please turn up the singer's volume level just a bit.
I understand that you’re trying to sell a product and therefore want to create the idea you’ve got something special to offer, which is fine. But the things you’re saying about other products on the market can at best be described as an ‘opinion’, but calling it misleading would probably be more accurate. We’ve progressed far beyond the Korg M1 piano sound you show a small clip of. There are quite a few options on the market that offer great dynamic range with many sample layers, offering a realistic sound with smooth transition from the softest to the loudest played parts. Also ‘less perfect’ pianos with ‘character’ can be found in many libraries. So your piano offering these features is fine, but not really unique. Ironically your demonstration of your piano sound in this video, although okay sounding, didn’t demonstrate that ‘great dynamic range’ you claim is missing in other libraries at all. 😅
Yours sounds great. Impact Sound Works recent Pearl concert grand piano sounds and feels fantastic. Check it out!
Thank you for your feedback, we appreciate you watching it so keenly! It’s true that we do stand on the shoulders of giants, that’s why we’re dedicating ourselves to keep the progression moving to a shiny new future 😊
@@TheCrowHillCoThank’s for your reply. To be clear, I’m not saying your product isn’t any good or anything like that, but I do appreciate honest marketing. Keep up the good work!
This is funny coming from the creator of the 400$ Hans Zimmer Piano library lol (just kidding, I really appreciate everything you do for composers, Christian).
That is a terribly priced product in fairness
Thats what torrents are for@@HiLoMusic
The biggest problems for me with sampled pianos I face as a mastering engineer is that they cannot provide phase coherence at the bottom end. A sampled piano note played with another sampled piano note below Middle C is *NOT REMOTELY* the same as the sound of both notes being played together.
With two sampled notes together, the phase intreractions cause comb filtering of the low end. I'm sure this is why piano sample libraries always have over-hyped stereo - they sound great in stereo. Try summing them to mono and hear all the low end of notes disappear with random gay abandon.
You heard it from the master himself! ☝️☝️☝️
You can’t argue with science
Thanks for such the detailed description
I''ve written and played all styles from pop, jazz, Afro-Latin to classical. Obviously I prefer a real instrument where possible but there are situations where that isn't possible or desirable from a production perspective. The solution for me for years now has been Pianoteq. Modelled I appreciate, but actually better sounding than most sampled instruments and far more flexible.
I'd add a little production trick of my own. Whatever you use, play the other instrument tracks in a room with an actual piano and close mic and record the cavity for use as a subtle reverb. Pianos, especially concert grands, resonate and sing with the other instruments and this can have the effect of somehow putting them all in the same space. It's a very slight difference but once you try it you'll notice it.
Hey Christian, great video as always! Quick question: could you do a video in which you explain why you're switching to cubase? I've heard you mention it several times now. I've been using Logic for a long time, and don't really have issues with it - I'm curious as to what the advantage to switching would be...
I can't believe I just found this channel. I am obsessed with your Fly on the Wall studio session video. Very talented and thank you for sharing your knowledge and life.
I hope the mention of a realistic bassoon was a reference to Synthesizer Patel from Look Around You, even if subconsciously 😆
Stina nordestam is a singing goddess! her work with David Sylvian is amazing, for new listeners, check out her track on the Romeo and Juliet Movie soundtrack and her video and track Dynamite,
One of her best songs. I thought no one knew about here outside Sweden.
I find that the sampled pianos I like the most are not the most clear 'upfront' straighforward pianos. I prefer the ones that are processed or have a strange character. Then you embrace the fact that sampled pianos are different to real pianos. I still love Noire the most. My second favourite is the Westwood Alt Piano. And I've been enjoying UVI's Austrian Grand and Modern D. For a _slightly_ brighter sound, I like Native Instrument's Claire. Some on my wantlist are Meyer's Postfelt, and SRM Max Richter sounds gorgeous. At the other extreme, I wouldn't snobbily knock the good old Korg M1 forte 'piano' too, it has it's use, it's all over so many great classic House tracks. Yamaha DX 'pianos' can be lovely in their own right too. As are basic synthesised pianos from analogue synths like the Roland JX-8P/JX-3P. The VI labs Model D & Upright are very good for more straight ahead well-recorded pianos, but they aren't really my style.
Hi there Christian (and fellow viewers)! If you could recommend a digital midi/piano/keyboard to a classical pianist looking to record digitally which one would it be ? So far I have my eyes on. Any tips from you or your viewers are most appreciated:
- Doepfer LMK4+
- Roland FP-30X
- Studiologic SL88 Grand
Ps. The sounds themselves are not important only the keybed/action is as we will be using PianoTeq 8 to record.
Your piano part reminded me of Ben Folds. Great sounding piano! I suspect one of the great difficulties in creating a real souilful, responsive sampled piano is that it's virtually impossible to capture how different notes (when played as a chord) interact rather uniquely with the space around them inside a room
That Bflat 3 bass octave is lovely and rich you can pick out the purity of those ringing bass strings I too love pianos aswell always has been old piano their tone aswell and each unison tuning between the trichord strings you every so slightly hear that wonderful marble sound in the tuning in the mid to high range especially when you use it dynamically you hear the action and feel the vibrations love the samples you’ve made ❤
My late mother was born in the Philippines during the war and later became a piano teacher:-) Perhaps she heard a piano like this as a small child....
I find it very exciting that you sample instruments with history and thus make them accessible to others.
The instruments that sound most real to me are sampled instruments whose acoustic, analogue counterpart I can't play or whose real sound I've never heard in a room. But with well-known instruments such as violins, pianos, guitars, flutes, etc., sampled instruments are simply imitations. They don't have the resonances, the dynamics or all the little quirks that acoustic instruments have. An exciting approach is certainly not to imitate the sound of the real instrument but that of a proper recording.
And a beautifully sampled piano in a DAW is still much better than no piano at all🙂
My father says, "Your mother's right, she's really up on things. Before we married, Mommy served in the WACS in the Philippines." Now, I had heard the WACs recruited old maids for the war. But mommy isn't one of those, I've known her all these years. ;)
I love the videos in the shed.The lighting is great.I still play your old videos,hahaha keep up the teaching.
I have to say I think this piano is expensive. That aside, I bought it and fu@@ing love it. Lovely character.
Nice work. My favourite to play and compose on is a custom preset made on the Nord Grand, from one of their uprights and a layered sample. While on paper a software instrument sound be better, I haven't sound that realism elsewhere. I like a piano sound with character.
with all due respect, my problem and growing concern with Christian's videos is that he brings a special level of intelligent charm and wit to the game that means he could convice us about ANYTHING and that's a bit scary to be honest. i would not like to buy into the reasoning that all my pianobook/spitfire/etc libraries are not good enough suddenly now and we have to buy this crow hill stuff. which is superb i'm sure of that. its just the over the top kind of reasoning that boggles me a bit.
Is just me being brutally honest about my own efforts!
IK Multimedia's new Pianoverse for me is an absolute game changer. 😎
I was lucky to be one of the few to get to use that before it went live and review it. It is a good piano instrument with a lot to it though I still currently prefer my Noire piano.
My go to favourite sampled piano is Native Instruments Alicia’s Keys. Sits well in a mix, lots of character - must have been using it for 10 years and find it very inspiring.
famous for having only 1 layer of samples
@@apaivab , as are a lot of people's other favorite piano samples over the years! There is something to be said for doing one thing very well and simply!
One of my favs is Skybox audios Obscura Grand. It's not perfect by any stretch but it has a vibe. All I really want is something like what you'd hear on an Olivia Dean album. The Vertical Piano is probably pretty close to that up-close indie singer-songwriter sound but I'm afraid I'll buy it and be disappointed - and at that price the disappointment will be amplified. I do still appreciate the work you're doing though👍
Oo-er, contentious! Out of interest, when you use a studio piano, is it you playing or do you get a player in? Like any instrument, including electronic, a majority of the resulting racket is down to the player. Give a guitarist Eric Clapton’s guitar and it still sounds like the other player. This is a fun post and I’m looking forward to hearing the finished article. 🙏
Stina - she was one of the most interesting songwriters of the 90s - never toured as far as I'm aware. Seems to have retired 15-20 years ago, but left some great albums behind ('And She Closed her Eyes', and 'Dynamite', particularly.)
Thanks, Christian, but I think it's not there yet. It sounds very much like a sampled piano. Maybe the limitation is in the technology itself. Plugin-wise, Acustica has pointed in a different technological direction and it feels wayyy better to me than any other emulation, more 3D, very flattering to the sound source just as (or almost) the hardware counterparts do sound. I'm hopping MIDI 2.0 and more velocity layers will help... But then the amount of Gb per library will be ridiculous, so I think some kind of smart interpolation between sampled layers will be key. Will IK Multimedia come out with a MODO piano someday? That could be interesting too. New solutions for old problems... One day!
Very interesting vid. Soooo good to see the Shed!! I would love to come work for/with you.
I’d love to see a video as to why you moved to cubase from logic. Any possibility that is in the works?
I was wondering when the first mention of Marmite on this channel would occur!
To overcome the "stiffness" of sampled pianos I usually layer at least 2/3 together, and very often I get some very interesting sounding "side effects"
Vegemite mate, not Marmite! 😂
@@mattwallis1893 well, I am un the group of those not born and raised in the UK, but moved here in 2015 😜
Is it possible to save User presets on the Vertical Piano?
I'm generally against AI when it's doing the work for us, but it seems to me that machine learning trained on a bunch of excellent piano compositions, plus some onboard samples to seed the plugin would make for an excellent simulation. That said, that's a very nice piano plugin
We were made to calculate the amount of processing and memory needed to truly sample a piano, just to prove that computers quickly run out of resources once adding the cross-mod, and resonances happening between a few notes in a body.
There are a lot quality sampled pianos out there. We're in no shortage really.
Using a software piano in a live situation is completely different from using it in the studio. I have spent too many hours experimenting with layers, mono samples and carefully contoured velocity-switch points that sound great at home but as soon as they're run through even high-end P.A. systems sound flat, out of phase, brittle, or all of the above. Does anyone know if Pianoteq can cut it live? Does it have the range from quiet warmth to percussive attack needed to match the dynamic range of a good grand piano on stage? I'd love to hear about people's experience using it.
I still miss the character marked by the resonances within each piano. Hitting a note will always trigger other piano snares to resonate with it. This can be captured by sampling. However, hitting a chord will have those notes amplifying the resonances within the piano and cancelling others. And while you can sample one note, it would be extremely hard to say the least to capture every combination of notes within a piano and the different resonances that specific combination will produce within the piano, especially when those chords wiĺ be sustained within the next chord. Etc.
Is this a teaser? Did I miss it? When do we see it?
Why are you switching to Cubase? I used to use that back in the Atari days and then on the earlier Macs but then moved to Logic as soon as it came out. Don't think I could switch again now unless I absolutely had to so wondering what your reason for swapping is?
Great video as always… just a curiosity… I’m switching from logic to cubase too, will you make a video about that? It would be very interesting!!
I’d love to hear about that too because I bought C13 with the same intention and love the feature set, but am really struggling with the UI and workflow. Logic feels so much cleaner and more elegant. I’m not sure what to do.
Nowt so good as a new thing eh Christian? I will be sure to resign all my previous purchases after your gentle diatribe! All the best!
What do you think about the possibilities of modelling instruments, Chris? The SWAM instruments are looking really interesting and Moore's law should make this an ever more convincing (sample beating?) approach in the very near future.
Most of the NI pianos are lovely especially Noire and Una Corda / the pianos that Fracture Sounds have produced are simply brilliant and the best in class.
I’ve been using Imperfect Samples, a UK source.
So no love here for Synthogy Ivory , I use that all the time for sessions and sounds great and has a large dynamic range.
I have unfortunately never had the chance to play a midi masterkeyboard with a velocity curve that felt natural to me but some sampled pianos manage to compensate somehow, in that those occassional (no idea how to spell that) way too loud or soft notes sound like bold musical choices instead of just spastic playing
Try a Roland D-2000 with Pianoteq 8. It's a dynamic duo. I took the plunge after watching Phil Best's YT channel.
I am Brazilian but I learned to like Marmite on my home made Sourdough😄 but just very little of it.
This is only my personal opinion so, anyone who loves sampled piano’s please ignore my following comment. I think certain “real” instruments are much more alive when you use acoustic modelling. I’ve used Pianoteq for years and it feel much more alive than any sampled piano I’ve ever heard. I’m not saying that there aren’t sampled piano’s that aren’t good or great but if you’re looking for a pristine piano(e.g. a Steinway), a product like Pianoteq is (in my mind) unbeatable. For those special “character” piano’s, sampling is great.
Agreed. I also use Pianoteq and have not looked back other than when I've needed a particular, very specialised sound.
I've tried Pianoteq and it's obviously now in my shopping list. The product sound fantastic. As soon I'll have the money...
But I think we need the 3 things. The sampled ones, the modelized ones and, if we can (not easy), the real ones.
Crows are some of my favorite birds. Love their yells. 😂
I often wondered why the Sample Library Builders never use a resonating layer that remembers previous keys touched, so they can make this subtle '3D' wash of resonating strings and wood. A note by note sample can't do that, while a real piano plays as a whole. Maybe it would work to capture how chords resonate and intermix as sums of sines. Can't explain it, but sampled pianos are 'empty'.
Some do.
@@peterrees9212 I'd love to know which one :)
Pianobook provides enough interesting piano samples. That's why I don't look for commercial products anymore...
Why did you record that bass sine wave first? - As a reference point for your piano part?
Pianoteq 8 is simply amazing. My goto piano for everything
So will soon make rendering piano and other instruments sound however you like. This will happen relatively soon.
Piano In Blue (piano from Atlantic Studios) - still my personal, if idiosyncratic preference.
The limits of playing a sampled piano is, by in large, a midi limitation, how many discreet levels of volume are restricted by the midi format.
128. This isn't really the problem.
Well, you are concentrating on the dynamics (vertical) but not considering the harmonic interaction (horizontal) dimensions of the piano. Any piano is a complex harmonic whole of the notes played, sustained with the sympathetic resonances and harmonies of the other strings and frame of the piano. Sampling one note at a time and replaying it cannot capture those interactions, since they are constantly changing and evolving in myriad ways. So you have a set of static photographs of the instrument and not an organic whole which is a complex sum of a harmonic system. It is a living, breathing thing, which incidentally does not conform to the tempered musical compromise we are so used to. So i don't see how it is possible to recreate that. This is true of many instruments and ensembles. Sure we can imitate them with varying degrees of success, but they will never be the same thing. That is not a bad thing, it is a good argument for the richness of human beings playing physical instruments which never issue streams of identical notes, as samplers do.
So true. Sympathetic resonances and even dissonances in pianos are the "alive" sound
Korg M1 has the best Piano Sound - great performance, very realistic, only 5 Samples, very CPU friendly too.
Joke. I prefer a REAL analog piano without power consumption. ^^
😂
Vegemite lover here but you have to use it pianissimo ly.
I actually love NI’s Una Corda
I use Una Corda but as a layer. It's a single string piano with great resonances so it works extremely well in adding the nuance against a lot of sampled pianos. I have a Roland GX 700 with the V-Piano supernatural module intstalled. It lifts the pianos. I also use with several Pianobook libraries to add the 'air' and resonace to those too.
@@allankeenmusic gotcha... I do the opposite, I use alone but I degrade it even more. usually play it at 2 to 3 octaves higher than I want it then I run it through half time and more tape saturation. Sometimes I would layer it as well with post card piano from teletone audio. It's sampled based also. Guess I like sampled based pianos because I don't try to get a realistic sound from them.
@@dazeja that's interesting. I will try that out too.
Me too. Still using it a lot.
Best teaser for any product I ever saw. BTW I love Marmite.
Lip balm, Christian. Lip balm 🙂
Yeah if you put lip balm on the mic and record a harpsichord it sounds like a piano
@@cheesewavepro tip right there
😂
Hydration
YOURE lip balm.
Thanks for keeping the rock rollin'!
Nothing beats the real thing recorded well.
Yeah, but the real trick is recording a "real" piano well -- easier said than done.
I was just thinking this very thing. I have so many piano VSTs and unless you can live play them in really well then they all sound dreadful.
Insightful video, thank you! Where's the new Vaults drop though👀
VSL Fazioli are absolute masterpieces.
You had some Stina Nordenstam in there! Caught you! Lovely mate.
A great first album. Little Star - fine fine - but the rest of the tracks. So good. Anyway! Yes.
If two different people sit down and play the same real piano one after the other, the piano is going to sound different, because, well, the players are human, and their fingers have different strengths and weaknesses and their own character. And the same is true if they play a midi keyboard with sampled or modeled sounds, or both. So, it seems to me whether the recorded sounds sound "real" is moot. There is no one such thing as the "real thing" anyway, as different players playing the same samples on different or even the same midi keyboards or play on the same real pianos, are going to sound different.
In the end, it matters not if notes of a real or virtual piano are recorded or played back "realistically", it only matters if the end result moves people emotionally when you play it. Seems like a lot of commenters here are losing sight of that.
That being said, I love the idea behind Crow Hill, even if I haven't purchased many of their products because I simply can't afford to buy many more plugins unless there is a compelling reason to do so.
"There's also marjoram." LOOOOOOOL!
Christian, I think sampled pianos suffer from the same problems as sampled guitars. Those hammered and plucked strings produce complex harmonics. Trying to capture those tricky things is hard enough but when you throw in the fact that each action produces subtly different harmonics each time and you have a considerable challenge on your hands.
Couldn’t have said it better myself!!
Marmite? I LOVE it! Sampled Piano? I wouldn't say hate, but I've never had a sampled piano library that I've liked.
Yeah, I find it hard to find a good piano sample.
Beautiful voice, great piano and marmite is my mate cus I love the taste.
I use Chroma (Sonuscore), EZKeys (Toontrack), Alt Piano (Westwood), Lo•Ki (Sonuscore). I love each of these for their own reasons. I did have to set them up quite a bit to perform how they need to, but they can do it.
The subtleties of overtones with a piano can be like trying paint with water colours.
I’m very happy with pisnoteq and Arturia. And all yours. And labs. And piano book. And… ok. Yeh. 😂😂😂😂
I find sampled pianos fine for songs with plenty of other elements but I think if recoding something sparse you really need to capture a performance on the real instrument
Pianoteq is astonishing
The sampled pianos nowadays are MORE than sufficient for EDM producers, also there is nothing wrong with making edm music if you are into that type of thing.
Great video/product!!
Fortunately MIDI 2.0 will help out the already released libraries a lot, not to speak about the coming modeling emulations by Pianoteq and others… Also, main problem are the piano players: to be pianist means to play as God commands. And that takes some training years. Finally, hardware matters: nothing still compares to a good Blüthner or Steinweg keybed, feeling the vibrations under the keys, pedals, etc. Not even talking here about the speakers that are far beyond the acoustics involved in this matter… nevertheless, let’s think that I’m about 10 years from now the digital to analog world will feel like those olden rachmaninoff times for us…
Ik has the best piano samples by far, but the software is trash
Many piano libraries sound too...well, "good"!
More Marmite please ❤
Such a beautiful sound mate
Mission,,,,Accomplished!!!
I miss the annex !!
I’m from Texas and I love marmite. It is indeed superior to veggimite.
Are you not with Spitfire anymore?
No longer! We started a new thing called ‘The Crow Hill Company’ where we make loads of whacky and insane vst’s and lots of splosh!!!