Is the 2022 Hyundai Santa Cruz BETTER Than the Ford Maverick?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 296

  • @ChrisPollard
    @ChrisPollard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I think it was a pretty fair overall assessment on the Santa Cruz. There is SO MUCH to like about this vehicle - especially the way it drives. At no point does it ever feel like you're driving a truck. I finally got to test drive one last weekend while waiting on my order to arrive. (Ultimate - Canadian equivalent of the Limited, Sage Grey) I primarily need a solid commuting vehicle that can pull some truck duties in the evening/on the weekend and is low enough that my wife can get in and out of it without struggling. This ticks every box for me.
    I'm sure the Maverick will do very well for Ford, and probably out-sell the Santa Cruz by a fair margin. It just looks cheap and boring by comparison, and the interior isn't somewhere I want to spend 2.5 hours of my day 5 days a week. The Santa Cruz is on a completely different level on the inside.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Santa Cruz will have a more powerful engine. Maverick is going to be delayed with the chip shortage. You made a good choice! Thanks for your comments

  • @danmillercrna
    @danmillercrna 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best review of this vehicle I have seen. Many complain there is no volume knob but it has a volume control on the steering wheel. I have always had Hondas. I have a 2020 CRV which I think is fine but I could not believe how much better the ride was in my 2022 Santa Cruz. What I call a Cadillac ride.

  • @kenro-96
    @kenro-96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Excellent review as usual Lauren. I ve been looking forward to seeing more info on this. Very practical and useful for day to day activities. Ill be interested in how this stacks up to the maverick in relation to price point.

  • @missbehavin8673
    @missbehavin8673 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Santa Cruz is built in America and I support that. Will be buying one soon.

  • @garymason7517
    @garymason7517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seems like a good choice. You don’t give away high number so easily. Nice looking car.

  • @troy9er
    @troy9er 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember seeing this when I was selling Hyundai’s. Glad they came out with it! 👍🏻 Bet that 2.5 turbo go’s pretty nicely. I’m retired now but am excited to see it in person. My 2015 Elantra has a Check engine light on. It hasn’t had one problem since day one. Of course now that it’s out of warranty the light came on, figures. SMH, all I have had to do to it so far is oil changes, new tires, front break pads, wipers, and a main battery. 60 K miles and this is the 1st problem. Probably a oxygen sensor. I’ll have to take it to my Dealer. Luckily they are the Best! I worked for them from 2010 through 2015. Before that I sold high end luxury cars for 15 years. This store really impressed me with their service. They always had top CSI #’s in both sales and service. Try em out, Pugi, Hyundai in Downers Grove, Illinois. Tell em Darryl sent ya.

    • @dougn2350
      @dougn2350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would think O2 sensor is covered under engine warranty.
      I had two Elantras and no issues up to 90k miles when I traded them off

  • @msbav8r
    @msbav8r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First time seeing this channel, as I'm waiting for my Santa Cruz to arrive.
    This is the best review I've seen.

  • @judih.8754
    @judih.8754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent review. It's nice to see a woman's point of view. I will be shopping for one of these in the spring when availability is hopefully better.

  • @robertsawyer89
    @robertsawyer89 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought my 2022 Santa Cruz Limited, and I love it :)

  • @bonnieson4989
    @bonnieson4989 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We just bought a 2024 one and couldnt be more pleased with it. Previously one couldn't get a comfortable ride unless a full size truck was bought. This marks all the boxes in a vehicle we were looking for. Really rides like a car but provides that occasionally needed truck bed. Plus gas mileage is decent. Hyundai was spot on with the timing. Considered the Ford Maverick but its in short supply and the boxy outside design wasn't as appealing plus the addtl towing capacity of the Santa Cruz Limited was higher. Plus the ride quality was so much better in the Hyundai. But to each their own. Purchase the vehicle that best fits you.

  • @fffwe3876
    @fffwe3876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    hands down win for Maverick.

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Butt that Front end

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ? with ford reputation and short warranty? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jrs9264 santa cruz almost twice as much! 100K 8 year drive train warrantee on the maverick FYI

    • @rkerver3
      @rkerver3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw that the Maverick has a cvt transmission, I have one on my Honda Accord which is great for fuel economy but prob not so great on a truck just saying

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rkerver3 as I understand it, this is a new CVT. It does not use a belt system, instead uses a metal gear setup, so hopefully more robust and requiring less maintenance

  • @PoppaSnipe
    @PoppaSnipe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I got fully loaded Maverick Lariat AWD 2.0 EB all package except first edition. Added moonroof and full size spare for $34,426.00. And the awd 2.0 EB Maverick get 29 hwy, 22 city, 25 combined. Enough said.

  • @Funsho97
    @Funsho97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I saw one of these on the road just outside Columbus, Georgia before they started selling them, pretty cool to see them in the wild!!! I like it!!!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are pretty nice and reasonably priced.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I put the new K&N filter in my Santa Cruz and it completely eliminated the Turbo Lag . Completely! 😊❤

  • @marcusturner9896
    @marcusturner9896 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice review keep up the good work

  • @sidneyhemphill4383
    @sidneyhemphill4383 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I didn't know any better I would think this is a Subaru. I love it.

  • @josefermalino461
    @josefermalino461 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As always awesome review😍🚙

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So glad this is built in the good old USA Montgomery Alabama 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅

  • @klasseact6663
    @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love your satellite station choice Lauren, I'm sure that guy you made go "bye bye" a couple weeks ago would've liked that, LOL😆

    • @kenro-96
      @kenro-96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too!

  • @markperry762
    @markperry762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep bringing it Lauren. Safe travels.

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dunno why, but I REALLY like this Santa Cruz! Try it in 2,5T flavor and AWD! It's a Tucson with a bed..Like the Ford Explorer Sport Trac was 22 years ago. Only much better...unless it's a V8 from the 2nd Gen sportrac

  • @OntarioAndrews415
    @OntarioAndrews415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does the front passenger seat have any power at all? Does one have to manually adjust it forward or backward?
    Good overall review. Thanks!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The drivers seat is power the passenger seat is not

  • @stephenhendricks103
    @stephenhendricks103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Reviewers seem to struggle to categorize the Santa Cruz. Some see it as a short bed pickup. Not really accurate and a description that Hyundai soundly rejects. Others see it as a crossover with a bed. Again misleading, I think. And certainly not comparable to the Hyundai Tucson that's over a foot less in length. The Santa Cruz is even 8" longer than a Santa Fe. To me, the Santa Cruz is more like a (slightly lifted) midsize sedan with a short pickup bed in place of a trunk. It's only about 3" longer than a Hyundai Sonata and in its fully loaded top trim has many of the same bells and whistles.
    As far as comparisons with the Maverick is concerned, from the information available it appears the two vehicles are significantly different. The Maverick is considerably "truck-ier". Not surprising in view of the fact that Ford's lineup in the US so heavily truck-centric. Consumers looking for a truck are almost certain to visit a Ford dealer. If they show up at a Hyundai dealer it's an error. Add the substantial Ford fleet sales compared to Hyundai and there's little likelihood that Hyundai will sell even a quarter as many Santa Cruzes as Ford's sales of Mavericks. But that's not necessarily bad news for the Santa Cruz.
    Although the Santa Cruz is unique in the North American market, it resembles another product sold in international markets (especially in Australia where it's quite popular).The VW Amarok's bed is about a foot longer than the Santa Cruz (5' vs 4'), a difference that makes it about 10" longer overall. Unlike the unibody Santa Cruz, it's a traditional ladder frame utility vehicle with stronger off-road chops than the Santa Cruz and and both 4 and V6 diesel engines. Nevertheless, it projects the same overall look and feel and the "adventure" vibe the Santa Cruz is meant to embody.
    In that context it's worth noting that Australia is an important market for Hyundai. It may well be that the success of VW's Amarok there suggested to Hyundai that a similar concept might work in North America. In any case Hyundai turned over the design of the Santa Cruz to their California design studio to come up with a design for a similar vehicle that reflects American tastes.
    It's also noteworthy that Hyundai chose to put the corporate 2.5L four banger in the Santa Cruz. In turbo form it's an engine now standard or optional in at least 8(!) Hyundai, KIA, and Genesis vehicles and coupled with the 8 speed DCT in at least five. It's appears to be an excellent choice with strong performance and better fuel economy than a V6.
    Is the DCT the best choice for serious "off-roading" ? Not really. But that's not the intended mission of the Santa Cruz. It's a great engine for daily use and for loads that are unsuitable for a sedan's trunk or an SUV's interior cargo space. A couple of years ago in a review of the Amarok I asked why Australians would choose it over an SUV with a similar size cargo hold The answer I quickly received was that coming home with a dead deer in the bed was preferable to sharing it with passengers. OK, 'nuff said.
    All in all, the Santa Cruz is a niche vehicle. But I suspect it will be successful enough to justify Hyundai's investment.

    • @mavfan1
      @mavfan1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thumbs down if you saw how ridiculously long this post is, laughed, and moved on without reading it.

  • @midnight4109
    @midnight4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The available equipment is impressive for a small truck. I wonder how the Maverick is going to match it on price. There is finally some serious competition in the small truck market.

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      seriously - 42 K vrs 22 k for the Maverick? how can you even compre the 2? is this twice as good?

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@h20bearboy65 The law of diminishing returns. the answer is in who sells the most trucks.

    • @h20bearboy65
      @h20bearboy65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@midnight4109 So Ford has 100K pre orders, how does that stack up to hyundai?

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I really hope it sparks even more competition among manufacturers.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@h20bearboy65 I would bet on the Maverick for 2 reasons. The entry level trucker is cost conscious and Ford has done a better job catering to them. They have also led the field since long before Hyundai existed and have an enviable reputation which explains why F- series trucks lead in sales. Hyundai is a smaller company and likely doesn't expect to sell as many though.

  • @bruin4937
    @bruin4937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really good review, thank you! Liked and subscribed.

  • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
    @BOSSYtexasCHICK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great review Lauren, but can't help but wonder how THIS received a 10 for features and (my) Limited Hybrid Tucson only scored a 9?! My Hybrid Limited trim has every single feature THIS does in addition to Smart Park, memory seats, hybrid engine, rain sensing wipers, power passenger seats, etc..... (and yes i remembered ur "Feature Score" of 9 on my Tucson and was miffed by it but didn't say until now when i see this scored higher...lol) Curious what you think the Tucson lacked when it came to features?! Thanks! Really love ur in depth non bias vids! BTC

    • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
      @BOSSYtexasCHICK 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dwik8740 well maybe so but i was thinking the bed was more an "equipment/utililty DESIGN" where all the things i named above were "features" maybe ur right tho, yes a BED definitely would rightfully raise its score IF that's what she was taking into account : )

  • @stevewierzbicki2495
    @stevewierzbicki2495 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Lauren, Do You know IF we are going to get a Hybrid Version to Compete Against the Maverick, in the future?

    • @marcdinetz8282
      @marcdinetz8282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i'm a Hyundai sales rep. No Hybrid in the works for now. We have been waiting several years for this beauty to show up at the dealership. The Tucson is available as a Hybrid and a Plug-In is also on the way.

  • @Cheesus4jesus
    @Cheesus4jesus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Maverick seats don't look as comfortable, thanks for mentioning the seat comfort. I also like that you get rear seat climate on upper trim levels, not available on Maverick.
    Does the Santa Cruz come with navigation standard or as an upgrade?

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Navigation is an upgrade, most people use Apple Car Play and Android Auto

  • @DV-tc1yr
    @DV-tc1yr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have the limited edition AWD grey and love it. Just wish it had sensors in the rear bumper if you come to close to something to alert you

    • @genesisg7022
      @genesisg7022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Does it come with a back up Camera?
      If yes, why does it need an alert?

    • @clifhellner1493
      @clifhellner1493 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How much did you pay?

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It does have a back up camera

  • @olesyakoktyan6713
    @olesyakoktyan6713 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good review as usual. But a lot of folks are turned off but the digital HVAC system. What happened to physical buttons? So this is a huge problem for Hyundai in general. Who says the cabin should look like a cockpit of Boeing 747? Underpowered American brands look a lot more appealing despite ridiculous “well the whole industry in moving in that direction” thing.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great input, thanks for adding that.

  • @mjsp-r2l
    @mjsp-r2l 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I thought Mavrick would be my pick, but after watching review with exposing structure and material under the hood I was disappointed with the built quality of bare cheap hood panel exposed wiring on it and cheap plastic interior. I liked the interior color scheme of Mavrick though.

    • @seruresto1386
      @seruresto1386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, kudos to Ford for pricing it so low, but there were a lot of compromises to be able to do so.

    • @hs5942
      @hs5942 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maverick is well designed but cheaply made to cut cost

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Maverick just won North American Truck of the Year, a very prestigious award

  • @lascelles7546
    @lascelles7546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I like the exterior, it’s a nice looking design.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no one on earth has this design, you watch the other car makers are going to copy for sure.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      for those who have a short memory this is a El Camino on steroids.

  • @Jluislive
    @Jluislive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very comprehensive review of one of the most interesting vehicles I've seen in a while. If you can fit 4x8s in the bed, I'd be interested in one.

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sounds like Maverick, Ranger or Colorado is more for you

    • @RickOhnsman
      @RickOhnsman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How often do you haul big stuff? I'd say if it's only 10% of the time you might question the need for something bigger. A trailer or bigger truck could be rented for those occasional needs far cheaper than just buying a bigger and less fuel efficient vehicle.

    • @Jluislive
      @Jluislive 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RickOhnsman not often, only 5 or 6 times a week.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Long lumber can be tied down and the tailgate can be set at multiple angles.

  • @decibellone696
    @decibellone696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like this vehicle. good looking and does the job it was built to do well. the only reason I wouldn't buy it is for my purposes the bed is too short and, I'm not a fan of 4 Cyl engines.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look at the Ranger and others. Agreed

  • @MrAdavisca
    @MrAdavisca 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice review. Love the vehicle and anticipate purchasing one. I’d like to make one correction the Limited model you were reviewing and the SEL premium do not have wireless Apple CarPlay with their 10.25 displays. These two higher models require wired Apple CarPlay. While the lower models actually do have wireless Apple CarPlay with the 8 inch screens

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting we were told all wireless, thanks for sharing that. Good info!

  • @hunkydude322
    @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    why is everyone comparing this to the Maverick, no vehicle on earth looks like this Santa Cruz. The rest of the trucks including the Maverick all look alike just the way it is, plus this is a El Camino on steroids for those who have a short memory Hyundai must have looked back at that El Camino and thought to themselves hmmmm.

  • @ibenpishtoff
    @ibenpishtoff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well, larger Hyundai dealers are getting in a few at a time, and right on cue, they are jacking up the prices claiming demand reasons. My wife has been waiting eagerly for it’s release, and now her dream vehicle has become monetarily unattainable. What a letdown, but not surprised. Price gouging should be against the law!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would suggest calling around to other dealers outside your area. I was able to find quite a few dealers she did not charge what is called, ADM, which is additional dealer markup. Order whatever you want and then wait for your perfect vehicle to arrive. It may take longer than expected but at least you’ll get what you want

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My Dealership in Richmond Va Refuses to do that! They sale on line too ! West Broad Hyundai ask for Tim ! They also gave me very good trade almost what I paid 3 years ago new ! I had a Kia soul turbo plus/ GT

  • @nicholasxayasith55
    @nicholasxayasith55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish it came in better colors. I wish it had a pass-through hatchway between the bed wall and folding rear seats to let you haul longer items. For the price, a cheap- feeling passenger seat - actually ANY seat, is a big fat omission. Wouldn't regular 'ol knobs on the console just BE BETTER than touchscreen everything? For all the clever, weird, nicely considered thoughts put into this vehicle, there's a few things I still wish it had and a few it did away with. At the MSRP, it might be more attractive in 5 years after depreciation. I suppose I could forgive a few things after a several- thousand dollars drop in price.
    Good review.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They say they built this for the techies but us Retired folks Love it! I took it to our Car Club Cruz in (no pun ) it drew a nice crowd! Hyundai Own me big for Selling this Vehicle but I have been watching and waiting for 10 years now ! The one thing Hyundai needs to fix it the tow package is about $800.buck not including install cost ! The dealership usely charge $ 100 per hr. This ante no frinkin chump change! And after market is not to be found! I know I looked everywhere! That Sucks!

  • @hunkydude322
    @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i seen this vehicle in pictures at the chevy dealer, but really didn't pay much attention who was going to make it, and i thought wow now thats a very sharp looking vehicle, this was a few yrs back and here iam looking at it now woww, i think Hyundai will be successful with this vehicle, i believe the timing is right this time around and plus we needed a drastic new design with these vehicle and hyundai had the courage to do it they pulled out all the stops and for broke, lol God willing iam thinkin of really buying one i have a full size truck but would be nice to have this as a second vehicle.

  • @dans8357
    @dans8357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Too expensive . I can get a full size truck for that 45k+ price . Maverick priced 10k cheaper when loaded with the extras.

    • @ChristianC-gy1ym
      @ChristianC-gy1ym 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Full size with virtually no options.
      Maverick also less features, less payload, less towing. Better fuel efficiency though. That's about it.
      40 grand is not that expensive considering inflation and the market.

    • @jimji2774
      @jimji2774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      45k you must be in Canada ouch.

  • @brutustheoldeenglishbulldo8672
    @brutustheoldeenglishbulldo8672 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review!
    I have one on order but I would have loved to have seen this made from the Santa Fe platform 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It has hidden kool stuff too ! Like if it gets to Hot In the Car! It cracks the window to let the heat out !

  • @thereissomecoolstuff
    @thereissomecoolstuff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Lauren how do you put a camera mount right in front of your field of vision. Good review but man. I think you can figure out a way around that.

  • @kc0lif
    @kc0lif 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i doubt about crossover definitely nice compact truck. similar to subaru baja, ford maverick. good vehicle i like watching her turn.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      for those who have a short memory this is a El Camino on steroids , Hyundai may have looked back and seen the El Camino and said hmmm.

  • @BarefootVlogger
    @BarefootVlogger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just got the same exact vehicle and gonna be cruising all over the state of Florida. Code name: Blue Iguana

  • @bobdavis3357
    @bobdavis3357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thumbs up!! I definitely like the Santa Clause.

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was a good movie too. 🎅

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wbwayne8887 what are you smoking?

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobdavis3357
      😂

    • @bobdavis3357
      @bobdavis3357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wbwayne8887 😂 😂

  • @herczeus9341
    @herczeus9341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes it is!

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We shall see - we will be reviewing the Maverick soon

  • @mikeherber8358
    @mikeherber8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like that i can change color in all modes as i have mine in RED in all modes

  • @rrbhokies
    @rrbhokies 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't see a button to turn off the auto start/stop. Are you able to turn it off at all? Or does the vehicle not have it?

  • @opencarry3860
    @opencarry3860 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks to be a nice rig overall.👍

  • @LLawliet182
    @LLawliet182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I must say it looks really good.

  • @nelsoncopo7529
    @nelsoncopo7529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    42,000$?!?? For that I could buy an f150 half ton!! Thats ridiculous.

  • @BOSSYtexasCHICK
    @BOSSYtexasCHICK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    P.S. Sounds of Nature IS there. You can see it at the 10:26 mark : ) BTC

  • @BoopSnoot
    @BoopSnoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The larger infotainment does not have wireless android auto/carplay, only the base 8" screen does.

    • @hunkydude322
      @hunkydude322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      back in the 1960's you'd be lucky if you had Am radio installed in the car.

    • @BoopSnoot
      @BoopSnoot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hunkydude322 IF you even had a car, most of the time you had to walk to school, up hill, both ways!

    • @jimji2774
      @jimji2774 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what they say and they won't be able to fix it till the 2023s. I've never used Android auto so I may not miss it. Still has Bluetooth connectivity and wireless charging.

  • @neubauerjoseph
    @neubauerjoseph 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think this would be the perfect kind of vehicle for fiat and also VW to have a truck.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      VW has tried in the past with little success.

    • @havok3344
      @havok3344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      These small pickups are very popular in many parts of Asia. VW, Peugeot, Isuzu, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Ford, and Toyota have always sold compact pickups abroad.

    • @neubauerjoseph
      @neubauerjoseph 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@midnight4109 well I think people love trucks so it could work.

    • @neubauerjoseph
      @neubauerjoseph 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@midnight4109 well its a new day and to say that it wont work not would be silly.

    • @midnight4109
      @midnight4109 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@neubauerjoseph whether it would "work" is a good question, whether any of those companies will try to sell a truck in the U.S. is a better one.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Turbo is actually 291 hp and 310 torque! I have one . The H trex is great! 6to 60 under 6 sec

    • @clifhellner1493
      @clifhellner1493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How you liking it so far? What did you pay?

  • @billwhiteathome2080
    @billwhiteathome2080 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure you can call it better than the Maverick. It costs $4k more, doesn't come close to 40mpg, and the bed only holds 660lbs max. It's based off an on-road SUV while the Mav is based off the Ford Bronco, an off-road machine.

  • @reivaj1769
    @reivaj1769 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought 2023 I love it

  • @76carmel
    @76carmel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hyundai won't call the Santa Cruz a truck.

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But my State Register does!

    • @rusty383
      @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Called a SAV SPORT ADVENTURE VEHICLE

  • @TheMichaelRN
    @TheMichaelRN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hyundai made a mistake selling it exclusively in NA, this would sell well in tropical countries.

    • @OlJackBurton
      @OlJackBurton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They don't have production for it. It's only being built in Alabama where they expect to build less Sonatas and Elantra due to reduced demand in sedans...

    • @BarefootVlogger
      @BarefootVlogger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Florida is a tropical country 😎

  • @TalismanPHX
    @TalismanPHX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Lauren, I worry about the durability of the DCT and turbo with towing heavy loads. Thinking that there will be lots of burnt clutch packs with the DCT... Excellent review as always 👏

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's a good point but hopefully the NA/torque converter trans is chosen here, despite less torque. Watching channels like thus gives you car smarts, maybe ALL salesmen should subscribe too💡😇🤔

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@klasseact6663
      Problem with choosing the NA 2.5L and 8spd TC Auto is the towing capacity diminishes. For the full 5K lb towing capacity, you have to opt for the upper trims with the 2.5T and DCT.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wbwayne8887 well my buddy and I were talking about this yesterday and concluded that Hyundai did plenty of testing of the drivetrain pulling weight. I know the DCT isn't really the best for towing but maybe there's a tow mode where it doesn't shift quite as fast. Keep in mind this is an automated manual and as we all know there's been stick shift trucks in the past.

    • @wbwayne8887
      @wbwayne8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@klasseact6663
      Good point, and I hope you're right. If I pull the trigger on one, it won't be for at least 2 years, so I will have plenty of time to sit back and observe the early adopters of the Santa Cruz.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wbwayne8887 shouldn't have to wait that long as it's based off of the Tuscon, maybe a year. I'm sure your not going to push the vehicle past its limits and that's key here. I'm sure it can tow 2 jet ski's or ATV's and gear in the short bed, no problem. For alot of people THIS is going to be perfect👍👍

  • @StraightOtohGunga
    @StraightOtohGunga 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Problem is is that the maverick has this thing be on price by a long shot

    • @suavemasky
      @suavemasky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Two different cars, maverick is a bare bone truck, while Santa Cruz is a luxury utility vehicle. Maverick has 19 percent of the features in Santa Cruz

    • @mark5862
      @mark5862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@suavemasky 19% of the features, that is silly. The XLT version has everything I want and I personally think it looks much better. The Santa Crus screams Subie Bratt. If you like that look great. The Santa Cruz has nothing to compare with the 43 MPG hybrid option, and the turbo engine gets 2-3 MPG better as well.

  • @hphillips7425
    @hphillips7425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My wife likes this vehicle and I told her if Scotty says it is good we will get one

    • @ChrisPollard
      @ChrisPollard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Scotty will never say it's good ... it's not a Toyota. :P

    • @hphillips7425
      @hphillips7425 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChrisPollard precisely. She stopped talking about it when I told her Scotty had to okay it 😎

  • @elol6357
    @elol6357 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice vehicle.
    Could be my next transportation, tired of driving large trucks.

  • @dougn2350
    @dougn2350 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Several websites indicate that Santa Cruz is currently the fastest selling vehicle in the US.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You Tube has a Great factor Video from Sheet metal to tires of the Santa Cruz being made! This is really one helluva little SAV lol Sport,Adventure, Vehicle! A hole new class . Last but not least! It sucks that they only have 4 colors! Ford is going to kick their asses on just that! Ford has some dang nice colors inside and out! But Hyundai has the quality and backs it with a fantastic performance and warranty! When you are retired that's very important I don't care how much money you have! Because our new administration is know for sucking everything you have worked for all your dry ! Get ready and grab your ankles!

  • @klasseact6663
    @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Looks WAAAAAY better than the Maverick❗ Speaking of that, why does Ford have such a problem coming up with NEW names for NEW cars (Mach-e, Lightning and Maverick) I'm pretty sure I read/heard somewhere the T-bird name was trademarked🤔
    Great review Lauren as always👍👍

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ford wouldn't touch the T-bird name, it's semi-sacred.

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnlewinski6359 really...what do you call the disaster that was those Lincoln LS-based turds they produced🤮

    • @klasseact6663
      @klasseact6663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnlewinski6359 T-bird is one of the most bastardized nameplates ever. Look at what they did to the car in 1958-60🤮🤮...then in 1967-70🤮🤮🤮...then in 1980-81🤮🤮...that retro turd🤮🤮🤮

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@klasseact6663 The 1980 is the most elegant Tbird EVAH!!!
      But seriously, Ford must have reasons for not using Tbird- maybe didn't test well.

  • @therationalistparty9742
    @therationalistparty9742 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Those wheels spinning backwards though! 😲

    • @marcdinetz8282
      @marcdinetz8282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a visual play on your eyes when the wheels rotate faster than the frames/second of the video

  • @nortecusa4046
    @nortecusa4046 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dumm question. How can you have a scoring system with out something to compair with. I was follow along. My scoring would be much lower. Is there such a thing as a ten 10?

  • @charlesdudek7713
    @charlesdudek7713 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A little disappointing that a vehicle that costs $42,000 doesn't have comfortable seating. Could definitely be a deal killer.

  • @lailanitaganap2402
    @lailanitaganap2402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a Santa Cruise hybrid coming out? If so 50 mpg would sell like crazy the Maverick hybrid gets 42 mpg? The Santa Cruise looks definitely better.

  • @Imachowderhead
    @Imachowderhead 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anything is better than a Ford.

  • @jimji2774
    @jimji2774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have $1,000 deposit on the $70,000 rivian that I won't be pulling the trigger on. Makes the Santa Cruz look inexpensive. Also the rivian is about 10 in wider which makes it a much more difficult vehicle to get around in. I might just get this one instead. My local dealer here in Colorado said he's getting nine vehicles in sometime in September and five are already reserved.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting, let us know what you decide to buy after your test drive.

  • @revmichaelm
    @revmichaelm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you get this truck without a sun roof?

  • @kurtp5379
    @kurtp5379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where's the spare tire?

    • @BarefootVlogger
      @BarefootVlogger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Under the truck bed. I checked. It's there lol

    • @marcdinetz8282
      @marcdinetz8282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Underneath

  • @pbentsonable
    @pbentsonable 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really like this but wish it came with better colors.

  • @geraldsandoval1113
    @geraldsandoval1113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every reviewer keeps talking about the resemblance to the Tucson. I have NO interest in the Tucson nor do I care one little bit about the "Easter Eggs! BFD to both. That said, I am planing on buying one.

  • @christopher1298
    @christopher1298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The santa cruz looks like they had an actual designer. The maverick looms like a butcher designed it with a meat cleaver.

    • @miguelircontar
      @miguelircontar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes exactly not a fan of the maverick

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maverick's front is the ugliest thing I've seen in quite a while. Like it hit a wall in the factory.

  • @ducknorris233
    @ducknorris233 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun fact - the working name for this vehicle was the THREEcson

  • @lubneejtshiab5948
    @lubneejtshiab5948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like Hyundai vehicles because they got the best warranty but 4 cylinder engine pick up truck can't haul anything except sponges.

  • @tocreatee3585
    @tocreatee3585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Maverick is much bigger and better fuel efficiency and better looking.
    and cheaper.

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      in your dreams...save up your money for a repair fund. you will need it after that short warranty expires.

    • @johnmoore3504
      @johnmoore3504 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is 2” much bigger? I don’t think so. Ford hasn’t released fuel economy numbers for the non hybrid yet. But yes the base Maverick is cheaper and gets more MPG.

    • @willie9397
      @willie9397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jrs9264 Hyundai is the one with all the engine problems they better get this right🤔

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      FRONT IS HIDEOUS

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@willie9397 not sure where you got that from. ask all the ford 2.0 ecoboost owners whose head gaskets failed. then, ask all the focus owners who sued over cvt failures. and, best of all, hyundai does not use takata grenades, err, airbags.

  • @YingYangStang
    @YingYangStang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can't say it enough, you look great, poised, smart, know your facts, well spoken, you check all my boxes I just love your reviews, thanks for all your reviews BTW, and you are a pleasure to look at - very attractive, can I ask you to dinner - 😂😂😂just kidding, not really 😱

  • @danc1197
    @danc1197 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Subaru dropped the ball when they dropped the Baja.

  • @DK-ys2cw
    @DK-ys2cw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry I couldn’t finish watching. I can’t support a video that risks the safety of others by mounting a large camera mount in your line of site

  • @dadmezz4024
    @dadmezz4024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It amazes me that you give good ratings on optional equipment but then would you give it a poor rating for the base model. As usual, customer beware that the manufacture bleeds you dry in America.

    • @mavfan1
      @mavfan1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL. Look at how Porsche bleeds the whole world dry with their options. America doesn’t come close.

    • @dadmezz4024
      @dadmezz4024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mavfan1 WOW...YOU HAD TO GO TO THAT EXPENSIVE BRAND TO FIND ANOTHER COUNTRIES GOUGER.

  • @freedomstar3814
    @freedomstar3814 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can do 100 mph on the freeway and it will look like 65 mph with those wheels ..... sweet !

  • @norbertrivera
    @norbertrivera 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks great but doesn't look like a pickup.

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True. The brands are calling them compact pickups for urban millennials. 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @larryhawes8295
    @larryhawes8295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Curious about the click bait title of your video that asks a question that can't be answered without driving a Maverick? Sad that I had to give the video a view from the deceiving title just to give a thumbs down. Maybe next time do an actual review of the 2 trucks from actual experience with both instead of pretending you did with a deceiving video title.

    • @Blitzburgh17
      @Blitzburgh17 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not only that but then say they can't compare prices because Maverick prices aren't available smh

    • @420hansol
      @420hansol 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just on the paper though, Santa Cruz seems a lot better. Based on just observation of the TH-cam reviews so far, Maverick is the one to get if you want base trim due to the MPG it gets, Santa Cruz is the one to get if you want top of the tier trim for its tech and load of features that come along with it.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey if you want a bigger BED by a utility trailer ! My little Santa Cruz Does everything I need and if I need a bunch stuff all I do is hook up my little 10 ft 4.5 wide utility trailer and pick up anything I want. Paid 750dollars for a brand new Trailer. My Santa Cruz also pulls my 18 ft Satalite Travel Trailer. 3500 lb My F 150 was a good soldier. I could have bought 2 Santa Cruzes for the same price! Da Ha !

  • @speedfiend925
    @speedfiend925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait Lauren, the driver gets Lumbar support which you are often critical of other manufacturers for not offering this and you only gave seating a 6? I DEMAND A RECOUNT! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol The seats were not very comfortable and the passenger seat was lacking.

    • @speedfiend925
      @speedfiend925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarCoachReports Not very comfortable? I might have to rethink my interest in the Santa Cruz. How do they compare to the Maverick? 🤔

    • @gwcrispi
      @gwcrispi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      She's full of it. Seats are very good in the SC.

    • @photo_n_art
      @photo_n_art ปีที่แล้ว

      Take in account that she is like 5' tall, for people vertically challenged most car seats are not very comfortable 🤷‍♂️
      As far as Maverick comparison, Santa Cruz has better seats and in general it has higher quality interior

    • @CarCoachReports
      @CarCoachReports  ปีที่แล้ว

      For reference, I am 5‘8“ tall

  • @MysteriousTony
    @MysteriousTony 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ....is it better?.... not without a V6.....

  • @bikebudha01
    @bikebudha01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    plz dont ever use the super fast swipy text. it's stupid...

  • @user-nr4di8bx9k
    @user-nr4di8bx9k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ford Maverick is better

    • @johnlewinski6359
      @johnlewinski6359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      BUTT UGLY

    • @user-nr4di8bx9k
      @user-nr4di8bx9k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnlewinski6359 I agree, the Hyundai Santa Cruz is butt ugly.

  • @kanehi
    @kanehi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's illegal in California to hang anything in the front windshield except in the left lower area. Looks like the camera is obstructing the line of sight while driving.

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We put in a deposit to be early in the queue. Then yesterday went to see the car in a showroom. The Santa Cruz. It is SMALLER than any of these reviewers are revealing, there is NO BACK SEAT. The bed is not big enough for a 4x8 sheet wide or long. And the hype and skinny deliveries are driving dealership markups to absurd levels. Skip this one folks. Get a Honda Ridgeline instead.

  • @TechDude56
    @TechDude56 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fugly. Looks like someone ripped the rear roof line off of small SUV and called it a truck. Maverick looks like a truck, not a wreck.

  • @mark5862
    @mark5862 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lots of reviews of both these vehicles and when taken in totality there is no clear winner so it comes down to what you like. For me the Maverick wins out in key areas like better mileage, more usable bed, and price. The Maverick kills it in the looks department, I don't care for the wacky Subie Bratt look. I didn't like it when I was a kid and still don't. It's a stretch to call either one fuel efficient in non hybrid form! 19/27 MPG? Get real that is full size truck territory. The Maverick hybrid will win over plenty of small car buyers with its price point and MPG nobody can touch it right now, and its worth pointing out the Maverick hybrid system and transmission is highly regarded. Its a good thing for Hyundai Ford doesn't offer the Maverick in AWD (yet). I test drove a Maverick (lowly XL AWD) and the build quality was impressive in my opinion. I especially liked the hard plastic but durable and attractive interior. Save the polystyrene foam and glued on wood accents for others. My only complaint about the Maverick is its not made in the USA! But heck can you blame them? I'm sure they don't have diversity managers educated in gender studies down there.

  • @cowboyga1
    @cowboyga1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    On just looks alone, this thing is freaking hideous

    • @jrs9264
      @jrs9264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤣🤣🤣 in two years, ford and chevy will copy Hyundai, again

    • @mowcowbell
      @mowcowbell 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like it, not just another cookie cutter SUV or pickup truck.

  • @bjwnet397
    @bjwnet397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I paid $100 reservation (a program I will not recommend bc this Hyundai
    sales/marketing program is BS), drove one and realized I would have
    buyer's remorse, piss poor gas mileage, no "smart" cruise control until
    you are willing to pay $40k, you have a lot of other choices that offer
    far better value at $40k. The dual clutch shifting is crap on the turbo
    model, quiet drive, pretty design, cute bed & options. If it were
    $30k with smart cruise & better gas mileage and/or hybrid or EV then
    I'd buy. But with communist democrats in office and taxes per mile
    driven discussed makes mileage real important.

    • @mikeherber8358
      @mikeherber8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honda is 1st to come out with dct transmissions