I am starting my bachelor in EE and i was strugling with circuits as i had found everything very confusing, nothing made sense and i did not know where to start. After investing my beautiful sunday in watching all your videos I can now say that the professor makes the subject. After your explanation, i am now in love with circuits. LOL, how things change from night to day. Really many thanks, may God bless you
Thank you so much for helping me through my circuit analysis class, your videos have proven to be really helpful especially during online classes where professors are generally hard to find for additional help, keep up the good work.
Hi Geno, If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.
@@HardwareNinja Thank you so much for the recommendation although some things are hard to follow since I just started my circuits class. Never the less, I find it very entertaining to me since I am interested in expanding my knowledge. Thanks again
i have a retest tommorw because i got 0 on the previous one due to my lecturer's poor teaching skill ( everyone is saying the same thing as me lol ) you dont know how much your videos helped me to understand everything i dont even know i have the abilities to. thank you
@Engineering4Free Many thanks for taking the time and effort of making these videos and sharing Your knowledge. It is in my opinion channels like Yours that give TH-cam it's actual value. Best regards P.S. Im not really "into electronics" but was just following along because I was "curious about the concept". But when I then also modelled this circuit in "Spice LT" it gave the result for "I1" as 0.4166666(recurring). So I went through on paper, following Your instructions, and got the same result for "I1" as the "Spice LT simulation". So as far as I can see Your "I1" is "slightly off" (0.01) due to You "transferring" Your "rounded/truncated value" for "I2" as 0.305 rather than the "exact value" for it that was -11/36 (0.30555...). When I made my "paper calculations" I "refrained" from any rounding until the "last step" and then those calculations also gave "I1"= 0.416666 (or 0.417 or "exactly" 5/12). I apologise if this appears to be "nitpicking", that is not my intention, and the difference might be totally insignificant for calculations of this type of calculation and context. But I can't tell if that's the case since I really don't "know electronics", and being a total novice just the fact that the "figures didn't match" even if it was "ever so slightly" made me question whether I had misunderstood something. ...Hence this "tirade" ;) Again many thanks for Your videos.
Is it not possible to use the third mesh? Or am i missing something, if ie = 2 i3 = -2 ie = -i3 id = i2 - i3 and going around the third mesh following the direction of i3 we have -2id -1ie = 0 putting in terms of mesh currents -2(i2 - i3) + i3 = 0 replacing i3 with -2 -2(i2 + 2) - 2 = 0 solving for i2 -2(i2 + 2) = 2 i2 + 2 = -1 i2 = -3 A which is not the correct answer, why?
I am confused why are you not consistent in using the I_2. for the I_b you used the negative value of I_2, but when it comes to getting the I_d you used to positive value of I_2. why?
Hi Ankit, If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.
Here is a question. In the deflection measurement of simply supported beams it is assumed that displacement measured at supports 1 supposed 2 and the middle span of Reinforced concrete beams are 0.10mm, and 6.8mm respectively. Please calculate the true deflection at the middle span of RC beams.... Please help
Scroll up and hit that 👍 button if you found this video helpful!
Full circuits playlist here: th-cam.com/play/PLOAuB8dR35ocf9Typ1iX9NRmX0V04UYfQ.html
Yo my answer is 1.68, 1.81 , 5.62 is my answer correct?
I am starting my bachelor in EE and i was strugling with circuits as i had found everything very confusing, nothing made sense and i did not know where to start. After investing my beautiful sunday in watching all your videos I can now say that the professor makes the subject. After your explanation, i am now in love with circuits. LOL, how things change from night to day. Really many thanks, may God bless you
been watching your videos for the past 3 days and they have helped me so much thank you I owe you all my tuition money
Thank you so much for helping me through my circuit analysis class, your videos have proven to be really helpful especially during online classes where professors are generally hard to find for additional help, keep up the good work.
Hi Geno,
If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.
@@HardwareNinja Thank you so much for the recommendation although some things are hard to follow since I just started my circuits class. Never the less, I find it very entertaining to me since I am interested in expanding my knowledge. Thanks again
This channel is carrying my grade right now
🤜🤛
you are an amazing teacher. may you always stay current :)) i wish my teachers were as good as you
i have a retest tommorw because i got 0 on the previous one due to my lecturer's poor teaching skill ( everyone is saying the same thing as me lol ) you dont know how much your videos helped me to understand everything i dont even know i have the abilities to. thank you
Don't blame it on the lecturer
@@sketchupstudio8449 Blame it on the curriculum
@Engineering4Free
Many thanks for taking the time and effort of making these videos and sharing Your knowledge. It is in my opinion channels like Yours that give TH-cam it's actual value.
Best regards
P.S. Im not really "into electronics" but was just following along because I was "curious about the concept".
But when I then also modelled this circuit in "Spice LT" it gave the result for "I1" as 0.4166666(recurring).
So I went through on paper, following Your instructions, and got the same result for "I1" as the "Spice LT simulation".
So as far as I can see Your "I1" is "slightly off" (0.01) due to You "transferring" Your "rounded/truncated value" for "I2" as 0.305 rather than the "exact value" for it that was -11/36 (0.30555...). When I made my "paper calculations" I "refrained" from any rounding until the "last step" and then those calculations also gave "I1"= 0.416666 (or 0.417 or "exactly" 5/12).
I apologise if this appears to be "nitpicking", that is not my intention, and the difference might be totally insignificant for calculations of this type of calculation and context. But I can't tell if that's the case since I really don't "know electronics", and being a total novice just the fact that the "figures didn't match" even if it was "ever so slightly" made me question whether I had misunderstood something. ...Hence this "tirade" ;)
Again many thanks for Your videos.
thank you for helping us naturally not-so-smart folks!!
i work better with formulas and doing the math rather than just raw theory. so this is super helpful
These videos are awesome! If you changed the direction of the current source on the right how would you go about solving the mesh?
Yo ur actually the goat
thanks bru 🐐
Is it not possible to use the third mesh? Or am i missing something,
if
ie = 2
i3 = -2
ie = -i3
id = i2 - i3
and going around the third mesh following the direction of i3 we have
-2id -1ie = 0
putting in terms of mesh currents
-2(i2 - i3) + i3 = 0
replacing i3 with -2
-2(i2 + 2) - 2 = 0
solving for i2
-2(i2 + 2) = 2
i2 + 2 = -1
i2 = -3 A
which is not the correct answer, why?
i am stuck with the same question. did you get why is it like this?
Hey. What if the 2A source was -2A. Would I3 be the same or would it be +2A?
Very nice video. Thanks!
I am confused why are you not consistent in using the I_2. for the I_b you used the negative value of I_2, but when it comes to getting the I_d you used to positive value of I_2. why?
Thank you so much
Any time
You just saved my ass!!!
Good work
Hi Ankit,
If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.
My answer is 1.68, 1.81, 5 is it wrong?
can i solve this using nodal analysis?
yes
Here is a question. In the deflection measurement of simply supported beams it is assumed that displacement measured at supports 1 supposed 2 and the middle span of Reinforced concrete beams are 0.10mm, and 6.8mm respectively. Please calculate the true deflection at the middle span of RC beams....
Please help