ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Mesh Analysis Example Problem #2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ก.ค. 2024
  • This tutorial
    This video is part of a full free course on electric circuits. The course covers DC circuits, circuit laws, current & voltage sources, series & parallel resistors, nodal analysis, mesh analysis, and AC circuits.
    Links to the course are here:
    Website: www.engineer4free.com/circuits
    TH-cam: • Circuits
    If you found this video helpful, then please give a 👍 and subscribe. If you're able to, please support my work on Patreon: / engineer4free
    Also follow these:
    Facebook: / engineer4free
    Instagram: / engineer4free
    Twitter: / engineer4free
    LinkedIn: / engineer4free
    Thanks for watching, I hope it helps!

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @Engineer4Free
    @Engineer4Free  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Scroll up and hit that 👍 button if you found this video helpful!
    Full circuits playlist here: th-cam.com/play/PLOAuB8dR35ocf9Typ1iX9NRmX0V04UYfQ.html

    • @serrerro543
      @serrerro543 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yo my answer is 1.68, 1.81 , 5.62 is my answer correct?

  • @duartegomes8491
    @duartegomes8491 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I am starting my bachelor in EE and i was strugling with circuits as i had found everything very confusing, nothing made sense and i did not know where to start. After investing my beautiful sunday in watching all your videos I can now say that the professor makes the subject. After your explanation, i am now in love with circuits. LOL, how things change from night to day. Really many thanks, may God bless you

  • @aleenatahreem8961
    @aleenatahreem8961 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    been watching your videos for the past 3 days and they have helped me so much thank you I owe you all my tuition money

  • @genoisarockingdoll
    @genoisarockingdoll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thank you so much for helping me through my circuit analysis class, your videos have proven to be really helpful especially during online classes where professors are generally hard to find for additional help, keep up the good work.

    • @HardwareNinja
      @HardwareNinja 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Geno,
      If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.

    • @genoisarockingdoll
      @genoisarockingdoll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HardwareNinja Thank you so much for the recommendation although some things are hard to follow since I just started my circuits class. Never the less, I find it very entertaining to me since I am interested in expanding my knowledge. Thanks again

  • @onlyeyeno
    @onlyeyeno ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @Engineering4Free
    Many thanks for taking the time and effort of making these videos and sharing Your knowledge. It is in my opinion channels like Yours that give TH-cam it's actual value.
    Best regards
    P.S. Im not really "into electronics" but was just following along because I was "curious about the concept".
    But when I then also modelled this circuit in "Spice LT" it gave the result for "I1" as 0.4166666(recurring).
    So I went through on paper, following Your instructions, and got the same result for "I1" as the "Spice LT simulation".
    So as far as I can see Your "I1" is "slightly off" (0.01) due to You "transferring" Your "rounded/truncated value" for "I2" as 0.305 rather than the "exact value" for it that was -11/36 (0.30555...). When I made my "paper calculations" I "refrained" from any rounding until the "last step" and then those calculations also gave "I1"= 0.416666 (or 0.417 or "exactly" 5/12).
    I apologise if this appears to be "nitpicking", that is not my intention, and the difference might be totally insignificant for calculations of this type of calculation and context. But I can't tell if that's the case since I really don't "know electronics", and being a total novice just the fact that the "figures didn't match" even if it was "ever so slightly" made me question whether I had misunderstood something. ...Hence this "tirade" ;)
    Again many thanks for Your videos.

  • @Festus2022
    @Festus2022 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice video. Thanks!

  • @proofaqw
    @proofaqw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i have a retest tommorw because i got 0 on the previous one due to my lecturer's poor teaching skill ( everyone is saying the same thing as me lol ) you dont know how much your videos helped me to understand everything i dont even know i have the abilities to. thank you

    • @sketchupstudio8449
      @sketchupstudio8449 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't blame it on the lecturer

    • @giggachad23
      @giggachad23 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sketchupstudio8449 Blame it on the curriculum

  • @LeBrosWeekly
    @LeBrosWeekly ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel is carrying my grade right now

  • @Mikebigmike94
    @Mikebigmike94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is it not possible to use the third mesh? Or am i missing something,
    if
    ie = 2
    i3 = -2
    ie = -i3
    id = i2 - i3
    and going around the third mesh following the direction of i3 we have
    -2id -1ie = 0
    putting in terms of mesh currents
    -2(i2 - i3) + i3 = 0
    replacing i3 with -2
    -2(i2 + 2) - 2 = 0
    solving for i2
    -2(i2 + 2) = 2
    i2 + 2 = -1
    i2 = -3 A
    which is not the correct answer, why?

  • @srilankanthunder
    @srilankanthunder 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These videos are awesome! If you changed the direction of the current source on the right how would you go about solving the mesh?

  • @ezzyy1147
    @ezzyy1147 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey. What if the 2A source was -2A. Would I3 be the same or would it be +2A?

  • @xbiohazardx7312
    @xbiohazardx7312 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You just saved my ass!!!

  • @georgiaclifford9274
    @georgiaclifford9274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thank you for helping us naturally not-so-smart folks!!

    • @georgiaclifford9274
      @georgiaclifford9274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i work better with formulas and doing the math rather than just raw theory. so this is super helpful

  • @danh984
    @danh984 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yo ur actually the goat

    • @Engineer4Free
      @Engineer4Free  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks bru 🐐

  • @shikharsharma8355
    @shikharsharma8355 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much

  • @Cool_dude_69_000
    @Cool_dude_69_000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good work

    • @HardwareNinja
      @HardwareNinja 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Ankit,
      If you're interested in electrical/electronics engineering, we're building a channel to help students and professionals prepare for job interviews with real world questions. We'd love it if you could swing by.

  • @yoori505
    @yoori505 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can i solve this using nodal analysis?

  • @serrerro543
    @serrerro543 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My answer is 1.68, 1.81, 5 is it wrong?

  • @thamsanqathusi9671
    @thamsanqathusi9671 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here is a question. In the deflection measurement of simply supported beams it is assumed that displacement measured at supports 1 supposed 2 and the middle span of Reinforced concrete beams are 0.10mm, and 6.8mm respectively. Please calculate the true deflection at the middle span of RC beams....
    Please help