This video just repeats itself over and over - lighter, simpler, and more efficient. This video should be cut in half with the same content. Sadly, no stats, hp, weight vs a normal engine. Yawn, I'll wait till I see and drive it. No forecasts when it might be available????
THIS is the engine that I designed back in the 1980s!!! EXACTLY!!!! It came about as a thought exercise after I read an article by the GREAT Smokey Yunick on the inefficiencies of the Otto cycle engine of that time. Originally, my design used a swashplate like a Stirling cycle engine, but then I read about an airplane engine called a DynaCam, which used a cam rather than a flat plate. Voila!!!! What I now see called in INN engine!!! Such an engine has a LOT of benefits... low weight, low center of gravity, NO VALVETRAIN LOSSES AT ALL, lower piston speeds, much less surface area cooling of the combustion chamber, no rod angularity to speak of, naturally balanced, high compression, yet resistant to pinging, longer piston dwell time, use of gas OR diesel (no, not at the same time!!! Duh!!)... these are just SOME of the advantages that I remember working out at the time!! This engine SHOULD'VE been available back in the 1990's!!!! I tried to get some people to machine parts for a prototype, but they all refused, looking at me like I had 3 heads!!! 😮 Now, I wonder what the efficiency would be if it were designed to adapt to Smokey's adiabatic system??? The ONLY drawback that I saw was that, while highly efficient and lightweight, I believe that it would be a very torquey, low speed engine... more akin to a diesel. However, with proper development... who knows!!!
@@bryanst.martin7134 Wow! Really??!! IMHO, Smokey was one of the GREATEST mechanics... PERIOD!!! He, and Ralph (you can't forget Ralph!! Lol), taught the car manufacturers things that even THEY didn't know!!! The France family did Smokey wrong, SOOOOOOO wrong!! Ahhhh, Smokey didn't need those pinheads anyway. He was pure genius and grit!! It is PITIFUL that EVERYONE doesn't know who Smokey is!! Remember when GM turned over the development of that lousy v6 that they had and Smokey turned it into a proper race engine! He could do more with less than anyone else that I can think of. From what I gather, the adiabatic engine never made it because either A) the big three didn't want to pay or B) the factory lawyers were afraid that at some point one would blow up because of that hot, vaporized gas sitting in the intake after the engine was turned off. I'm sure Smokey had a fix for that, too!!! It also pains me whenever I read that something or other was found or developed because of a Spintron machine. Well, the first "Spintron" was the SMOKETRON that Smokey developed!! I wouldn't be at all surprised if the big block porcupine head wasn't Smokey's idea in the first place!! Anyway, Bryan, it's great to hear from other fans of Smokey!! 😃
Heard this before: engines running on water,100 mpg carbs, before the internet in car and science magazines only to never happen. Cut the BS and show me the car for sale at the dealership.
Water is not a fuel thus you need a battery/electricity to split it into H and O . And there is the down fall of the hydrogen engine. It is not efficient due to the two step process, 1St to make hydrogen fuel and then to burn it in a combustion engine which is never efficient than an electric motor. You are right.
Not true, that's the clown think. It takes x amount of fuel to run a conventional gas motor This engine works like current automobile air-conditioned pumps..
@@giles-df9yu good analogy. Also engines with opposing pistons have been around a while but concept never took hold. I’ve heard of technology being bought and shelved and changing infrastructure making adaptation uneconomic but the world’s biggest make should be able to do it if anyone.
Last time I checked, engines require maintenance. Who's going to maintain the INN engine? Local independent shops won't have the expertise, tools and parts to offer maintenance in the first 5 years. If you're an early buyer, prepare for high dealership service costs.
Congratulations. This is the 1 millionth " New miracle engine " video this week. I wonder what would actually happen if even one of these miracle engines found its way into the market? So far all we can do is use our imaginations.
Every other day a new video pops up "toyota changed the game with this". Yet somehow their trucks still get 16 hwy/11 city with only about 300hp when a 700hp ford gets the same mpg and my 450hp f150 gets 22hwy/13 city. Toyota aint doin much.
I don't think I've watched another video that takes so many words to say so little. I watched another much shorter video which actually explains how the engine works and also identifies its pros and cons.
this type of engine was first designed in the very start of the car makers, It was not used as the auto makers had already tooled up for the type of engine that we know today. I like the idea and can see great power in a small sized engine and be far more friendly to the environment.
A drawback of the design is that the cylindrical rollers are running around a circular cam track. There is a speed difference between the inside and outside of each roller so there is always skidding happening across the face of the rollers.
Hybrid-Electric with a small diesel Auxiliary Power Unit is the way to go. For places like here in Texas photo-voltaic should be on all horizontal surfaces to provide charge to the batter when the sun is up. Ideally a stand-alone environmental unit that is solar powered would be installed. When the vehicle is in motion auxiliary power is provided to that environmental system using an air intake and exhaust turning a turbine.
Toyota knows what they doing. A few years ago, the media hyped behind politicians and other companies around ev vehicles. Now, they finally realizing that consumers don’t want evs but hybrids. Toyota has a long term strategy to ensure quality, efficiency and effectiveness.
"If I ask people what they want, they say a faster horse." --Henry Ford Toyota's strategy is to stall until they can perfect their batteries and EV. they do this by pushing hybrids, taking Japanese government hydrogen research money, and spreading FUD about EVs.
This engine design has been around for quite some time. It may be novel in the sense that it is not in mass production, but it isn't not, by any means, a novel design.
Toyota already lead the industry in dependability . I cant wait to see what else Toyota bring to the table. One thing I can say is that I have saved so much money not going to the shop since I switched over 20 years ago.
The only issue is horizontal pistons will wear out a lot faster than vertical ones. That's the biggest problem with Subaru engines. Gravity pulls on the pistons, wearing them out more on the side closest to the ground.
The piston doesn't ride on its side. It rides on its rings, which are designed to scrape equally all around to keep the air-fuel mixture and combustion gases separate from the oil. It simply doesn't matter how the piston is oriented.
Yeah, I bet they're antsy about the severe hot spot in its center, and spin it as a "potential energy source." At any rate, two-stroke opposed-piston engines are always diesel because the layout makes perfect sense for compression-ignition fuels. And the electronics are simpler, not needing a spark plug or sophisticated timing. The INN would work better with whole multiples of 6 pairs of opposed pistons, to eliminate tertiary imbalance without the need for the crankplate being weighted. Maybe 12 pairs with a large hole in the middle for an air-cooled aircraft engine.
This is the engine that could save the gas engine automobile! This article needs more specifics; P/W ratio, Specific Fuel Consumption, emissions/distance, etc,etc.
Support hydrogen as clean efficient source of energy for so,long. It is easy to see its high potential but it is facing with block from old way energy suppliers to the point of ……….😊
Impressive creativity of Toyota again. What are the comparisons to normal ICE engines, long term durability, and torque comparisons. Are you building it for Hydrogen too? Hydrogen or electric are not optional any longer, we've done polluted the world beyond reasonable limits, plastics, carbon exhausts, forever chemicals, and numerous other toxins that are costing trillions to clean up. And now civil unrest over the facts?
It still runs on gas. What happened to that hydrogen engine we we were all aquiver about!? Back to gas I guess :(. Can at least tell us the MPG from this "marvel"?
I thought it sounded something like the traditional term for Native Americans when it was mispronounced by uneducated people, sometimes heard on the old Western shows.
Not novel and riddled with errors. For starters the roller bearings to swash plate interface is skidding across the bearing OD because the inner and outer edge of each ball bearing is on a different radius of the swash plate face.
I think if all the auto manufacturers would quit screwing around with trying to reinvent ICE’s and dedicate all that time money and resources to battery technologies we would get to where we need to be much quicker. These engines will never achieve the simplicity and efficiency of an electric motor. This makes no sense at this time.
Note to Toyota:
Edit this video down by six minutes. You are just droning on with no actual statistics.
I know another repeat, repeat, repeat .Another AI video.
Toyota did not create this droning video.
This video just repeats itself over and over - lighter, simpler, and more efficient. This video should be cut in half with the same content. Sadly, no stats, hp, weight vs a normal engine. Yawn, I'll wait till I see and drive it. No forecasts when it might be available????
Only half?🤣 This is what happens when AI does TH-cam.
And shows the invention of the "one-stroke" engine by those Spanish inventors. How cringy!
120hp naturally aspirated from only 500cc of displacement and weighs only 35 kilograms.
th-cam.com/video/9I0_3qFmPUM/w-d-xo.html
@@youxkio The so-called one-stroke engine is actually a two-stroke.
Intriguing but much more information needed.
That motor was designed by a group of engineers from Spain, not by Toyota! Looks for videos about it here in TH-cam!!!!
THIS is the engine that I designed back in the 1980s!!! EXACTLY!!!! It came about as a thought exercise after I read an article by the GREAT Smokey Yunick on the inefficiencies of the Otto cycle engine of that time. Originally, my design used a swashplate like a Stirling cycle engine, but then I read about an airplane engine called a DynaCam, which used a cam rather than a flat plate. Voila!!!! What I now see called in INN engine!!!
Such an engine has a LOT of benefits... low weight, low center of gravity, NO VALVETRAIN LOSSES AT ALL, lower piston speeds, much less surface area cooling of the combustion chamber, no rod angularity to speak of, naturally balanced, high compression, yet resistant to pinging, longer piston dwell time, use of gas OR diesel (no, not at the same time!!! Duh!!)... these are just SOME of the advantages that I remember working out at the time!! This engine SHOULD'VE been available back in the 1990's!!!!
I tried to get some people to machine parts for a prototype, but they all refused, looking at me like I had 3 heads!!! 😮 Now, I wonder what the efficiency would be if it were designed to adapt to Smokey's adiabatic system???
The ONLY drawback that I saw was that, while highly efficient and lightweight, I believe that it would be a very torquey, low speed engine... more akin to a diesel. However, with proper development... who knows!!!
Wow! You're the 1st person I have heard that knew of Smokey's Adiabatic engines. Let alone about Smokey himself.
@@bryanst.martin7134 Wow! Really??!! IMHO, Smokey was one of the GREATEST mechanics... PERIOD!!! He, and Ralph (you can't forget Ralph!! Lol), taught the car manufacturers things that even THEY didn't know!!! The France family did Smokey wrong, SOOOOOOO wrong!! Ahhhh, Smokey didn't need those pinheads anyway. He was pure genius and grit!! It is PITIFUL that EVERYONE doesn't know who Smokey is!! Remember when GM turned over the development of that lousy v6 that they had and Smokey turned it into a proper race engine! He could do more with less than anyone else that I can think of. From what I gather, the adiabatic engine never made it because either A) the big three didn't want to pay or B) the factory lawyers were afraid that at some point one would blow up because of that hot, vaporized gas sitting in the intake after the engine was turned off. I'm sure Smokey had a fix for that, too!!! It also pains me whenever I read that something or other was found or developed because of a Spintron machine. Well, the first "Spintron" was the SMOKETRON that Smokey developed!! I wouldn't be at all surprised if the big block porcupine head wasn't Smokey's idea in the first place!! Anyway, Bryan, it's great to hear from other fans of Smokey!! 😃
I thought I clicked a loop button with how much it repeats itself
Heard this before: engines running on water,100 mpg carbs, before the internet in car and science magazines only to never happen. Cut the BS and show me the car for sale at the dealership.
The oil companies shut them all down
Water is not a fuel thus you need a battery/electricity to split it into H and O . And there is the down fall of the hydrogen engine. It is not efficient due to the two step process, 1St to make hydrogen fuel and then to burn it in a combustion engine which is never efficient than an electric motor. You are right.
Not true, that's the clown think. It takes x amount of fuel to run a conventional gas motor
This engine works like current automobile air-conditioned pumps..
@@giles-df9yu good analogy. Also engines with opposing pistons have been around a while but concept never took hold. I’ve heard of technology being bought and shelved and changing infrastructure making adaptation uneconomic but the world’s biggest make should be able to do it if anyone.
Are the jap joking. Water is H2o. Only 2 types of gas. Maybe it'll work with if add on coffee n milo or coke or red bull .. 😂👌
This video is fake! Innengine has been invented and design by a spanish engineer. It is patent, and it has been not to sold to toyata
Correct this known in Spain as the One stroke Enginen not a Toyota patent
Can you get thru to that person and message him. I thought when i saw it that he sold it to toyota. But if it isnt so it should be stopped
@@pernielsen9812 th-cam.com/users/results?search_query=innengine
This engine was really biuld in canada back in 1978
How about efficiency, hp, and torque numbers?
120hp naturally aspirated from only 500cc of displacement and weighs only 35 kilograms.
th-cam.com/video/9I0_3qFmPUM/w-d-xo.html
Emissions are probably awful.
Yeah, there are NO details, just pretty 3D pictures.
@@scottcarr3264 Some of them are pretty old. Film footage. People have been screwing around with these engines for many years.
Last time I checked, engines require maintenance. Who's going to maintain the INN engine? Local independent shops won't have the expertise, tools and parts to offer maintenance in the first 5 years. If you're an early buyer, prepare for high dealership service costs.
Congratulations. This is the 1 millionth " New miracle engine " video this week. I wonder what would actually happen if even one of these miracle engines found its way into the market? So far all we can do is use our imaginations.
if you watched 1 video a second, you had to stay awake 11.57 days just to watch every one of them, so YOUR TELLING A TRUMPIAN SIZED LIE!
THIS one would work very well, though!!
A robot reading directly from the press release
A robot made it all up.
Who ever has a robot doing This. Hopefully Toyota stops it for good neither they or the in venter of This engine deserves that
Clickbait! Cheap
Clickbait CRAP!
Opposed-piston two-stroke swash plate engine. What is the thermodynamic efficiency? How heavy?
It will be the usual 25% efficiency meaning that it is a nasty CO2 emitter.
Every other day a new video pops up "toyota changed the game with this".
Yet somehow their trucks still get 16 hwy/11 city with only about 300hp when a 700hp ford gets the same mpg and my 450hp f150 gets 22hwy/13 city.
Toyota aint doin much.
I don't knowanyone who would drive a USA made vehicle.
@@timmackinnon5547 You don't have friends.
I don't think I've watched another video that takes so many words to say so little. I watched another much shorter video which actually explains how the engine works and also identifies its pros and cons.
Innengine is a Spanish patent. NOT toyota's !
How many times can you say INN engine in a video.
this type of engine was first designed in the very start of the car makers, It was not used as the auto makers had already tooled up for the type of engine that we know today. I like the idea and can see great power in a small sized engine and be far more friendly to the environment.
Only 2 cold pizzas for an entire fire department?
That engines going to be wild
No, it's not. BEV > ICE.
Very cool can't wait .
This engine was around almost 30 years before Toyota pick it up. Other companies have already had this engine approved for aircraft use.
This will hit the market at about the same time that 'The Line' in Saudi Arabia is completed.
And the British time travel machine goes online
But this engine had a head start of about 20 years.
I guess I felt in sleep in the mid of this endless video !
I will believe it when I actually see it. Toyota, the ball is in your court ok?
A drawback of the design is that the cylindrical rollers are running around a circular cam track. There is a speed difference between the inside and outside of each roller so there is always skidding happening across the face of the rollers.
It's not over until it's over. Make production come true.
Hybrid-Electric with a small diesel Auxiliary Power Unit is the way to go. For places like here in Texas photo-voltaic should be on all horizontal surfaces to provide charge to the batter when the sun is up. Ideally a stand-alone environmental unit that is solar powered would be installed. When the vehicle is in motion auxiliary power is provided to that environmental system using an air intake and exhaust turning a turbine.
What is its swept volume?
🤣😂 innengine is from a spanish company not toyota
I also know that the source engine is Spain, and I feel this video is probably propaganda.
All the people who wanted an EV have already bought one. And regret it.
Toyota is today's Nokia. They have bet on the wrong technology and won't admit it. First the fuel cell and now this.
Exactly! A bulletproof product that fails to keep up with times.
I love technolo - cheese. Thanx.
Between Toyota's Hydrogen engine and It's Ion Engine The Lead The World in Technology
What a load of tosh and an adaption of the diesel Napier engine used in WW II with the benefit of a circular output.
Awesome tech ftom the reliability expert ....
This is perfect example of the expression "All hat no cattle" if you know what I mean. Car Catch should be ashamed for producing this video.
Boy would I love to build those engines to spec. They come out in end my life, but my brain says Wow!
Looks like a winner. I love Toyota cars I have a Mazda Miata now. I would like to see a Toyota car that size in a roadster.
Toyota knows what they doing. A few years ago, the media hyped behind politicians and other companies around ev vehicles. Now, they finally realizing that consumers don’t want evs but hybrids. Toyota has a long term strategy to ensure quality, efficiency and effectiveness.
"If I ask people what they want, they say a faster horse." --Henry Ford
Toyota's strategy is to stall until they can perfect their batteries and EV. they do this by pushing hybrids, taking Japanese government hydrogen research money, and spreading FUD about EVs.
Do not waste your time on this content-free video.
This is a self-destructive engine, bumping itself to death in no time
TH-cam please find the man Who made This engine and contact him. And contact toyota to
If toyota ever decides to build the Stout pickup this would be a perfect power plant for it.
You mentioned you were going to show how it works, but you didn’t show how it works or explain
It's AI generated, so you're asking a machine.
Innengine is spanish. Not Japanese.
just a dream right now
Thank you. Impressive engineering!
the INN engine isnt developed by toyota.
Voilà un super moteur grande invention 😊plus hydrogène et c est le top.
They know that EVs are the future that just don't have the knowledge or the financial back up to proceed
"all fart & no shitt" video
LOL--I've never heard THAT one before! Maybe this engine uses EX-LAX instead of oil as a lubricant.
Anything that reciprocates absorbes energy because the weight is reversing
Worst video of 2024 award goes to..........
So many images are wrong and confusing regarding the technology involved
What a load of waffle.
No facts, just time wasting waffle.
Thank goodness for Japanese technology.
They'd better get to work on EVs. They are years behind and screwing around with stupid hydrogen.
This engine design has been around for quite some time. It may be novel in the sense that it is not in mass production, but it isn't not, by any means, a novel design.
That’s great and all…. What’s it sound like?
It is an Axial/Barrel (Swashplate) Opposing-Piston engine, would like to see a diesel version...
So when can i buy one? I want one!
Who wrote this repetitive, bulls**t commentary? Toyota PR department?
AI
It's quite similar to subaru & porsche's boxer engine!!!
Toyota already lead the industry in dependability . I cant wait to see what else Toyota bring to the table. One thing I can say is that I have saved so much money not going to the shop since I switched over 20 years ago.
The Japanese are very good at refining and applying a technology. Less so at the innovating of new designs.
The inventor of this engine is not Toyota but: INNengine S.L. a startup located in Spain
Toyota is not advertising it, why you?
Very rotary type.
this kind of design was originally done by the Germans during WW2 for airplanes to fly long distances at high efficiency
well done ,bring itr on
The only issue is horizontal pistons will wear out a lot faster than vertical ones. That's the biggest problem with Subaru engines. Gravity pulls on the pistons, wearing them out more on the side closest to the ground.
The piston doesn't ride on its side. It rides on its rings, which are designed to scrape equally all around to keep the air-fuel mixture and combustion gases separate from the oil. It simply doesn't matter how the piston is oriented.
Dude! Didn't you know? You're supposed to have the pistons rotated every 10,000 miles.
I see potential in applications other than auitomobiles...
Yeah, I bet they're antsy about the severe hot spot in its center, and spin it as a "potential energy source." At any rate, two-stroke opposed-piston engines are always diesel because the layout makes perfect sense for compression-ignition fuels. And the electronics are simpler, not needing a spark plug or sophisticated timing. The INN would work better with whole multiples of 6 pairs of opposed pistons, to eliminate tertiary imbalance without the need for the crankplate being weighted. Maybe 12 pairs with a large hole in the middle for an air-cooled aircraft engine.
This is the engine that could save the gas engine automobile! This article needs more specifics; P/W ratio, Specific Fuel Consumption, emissions/distance, etc,etc.
Wow, Soon Only Not Yet
I dont think they realize people have to travel to 2/ 10 cities for work needing cheap transportation
They've had this same swash plate design for decades. We won't see it.
I liked the muffler bearings and piston return springs, don’t forget the blinker fluid . Thanks for the video Pete and Re-Pete
Good name for an AI algorithm.
Wobble plate engine is old news.
Around 20 years ago.
Support hydrogen as clean efficient source of energy for so,long. It is easy to see its high potential but it is facing with block from old way energy suppliers to the point of ……….😊
Exhaust emissions?
Shhhh!
Impressive creativity of Toyota again. What are the comparisons to normal ICE engines, long term durability, and torque comparisons. Are you building it for Hydrogen too? Hydrogen or electric are not optional any longer, we've done polluted the world beyond reasonable limits, plastics, carbon exhausts, forever chemicals, and numerous other toxins that are costing trillions to clean up.
And now civil unrest over the facts?
THE HYDROGEN ENGINE HAS A LIFE TIME WARRANTY
Well done Toyota.miles ahead
Really? No BEV strategy, no Solid State battery, belief in Hydrogen and now this BS.
Did Toyota buy the Dynacam engine which has been for sale for 20 years.
No, this is all fake AI.
I didn't catch the name of the engine. Did he mention it?
It still runs on gas. What happened to that hydrogen engine we we were all aquiver about!? Back to gas I guess :(. Can at least tell us the MPG from this "marvel"?
Sounds more like a commercial than explaining it.
no mention about fuel efficiencies nor the power and torque capabilities.
Would this engine work on Ultra light Air planes?
Now that they have the lightweight powerful engine how long until the flying car?
Hey did anyone catch the name of this new Toyota engine?
I'm not sure, but I think he said INN.
I thought it sounded something like the traditional term for Native Americans when it was mispronounced by uneducated people, sometimes heard on the old Western shows.
Its called jhfgzhvjjjbvhgvjzvj 😂😂😂
Swash plate...oiling may be an issue. Would love to see some specs...horsepower, weight, size.
Not novel and riddled with errors.
For starters the roller bearings to swash plate interface is skidding across the bearing OD because the inner and outer edge of each ball bearing is on a different radius of the swash plate face.
I would of liked to hear the engine run..
It's over, when it's over.
it will soon be here ,but not yet !
This could have been a 1 minute video.
0to60....the only problem we have...MANS EGO
I think if all the auto manufacturers would quit screwing around with trying to reinvent ICE’s and dedicate all that time money and resources to battery technologies we would get to where we need to be much quicker. These engines will never achieve the simplicity and efficiency of an electric motor. This makes no sense at this time.
Is the torque generated remarkable?
More talk than torque.