Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- Please join the Project on Nuclear Issues (PONI) on Thursday, August 1, 2024, at 10:00 am ET for a discussion with Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy Dr. Vipin Narang, moderated by PONI director Dr. Heather Williams. The event will open with an address by the Acting Assistant Secretary, followed by an audience Q&A. The Acting Assistant Secretary will address a range of international security challenges, including the emergence of China as a nuclear peer, Russian nuclear threats, and discuss the role of allies in addressing these challenges.
This event is made possible through general support to the Project on Nuclear Issues.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D2 | Fall | ต้องรักษาฟอร์ม อย่ายอมให้ใครแซง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/x38QsGn7A3M/mqdefault.jpg)
starts 7:55
The real MVP here
did I understand correctly that in order to uphold peace you recommend increased number and more lethal nuclear weapons? Thats all the while the only country to ever use nuclear weapons remains the United State.
stop cyber crime
stop crime
''We've been sincere and with good faith efforts''' - You sure about that ? 🤣🤣
Since when the west is sincere and have good faith ?
For all of its faults, it is much better than the alternative
@@justadam1917 yeah better being the robber than the robbed.
Do you have reason to think this isn’t true? Before you just say things think, what possible reason would the U.S. have to not sincerely attempt to reach out to other nuclear powers?
1. As the country at the top of the current international order it signals a commitment to preserving peace
2. Prevents negative disruption of status quo where America is king
3. Also just prevents nuclear war
Just spouting off bullshit rly doesn’t say much, think about the interests of the nation in question, the U.S. has the most to lose in a nuclear war, and so will seek to prevent it at all costs
Similarly Russia keeps rattling its nuclear saber precisely because it has little to lose, it has disproportionate nuclear capabilities to its conventional ones so to exert power on those beyond its relatively small area of influence it invokes nuclear fears
the US you have looked at us funny - get ready the nukes policy aka preemption. Whatever the issue the US supports freedom, democracy and everyone else is an axis of evil. The US is a state and everyone else is a regime. The US is always defending (in Afghanistan,Iraq, Vietnam...) has over 120 bases to do so, a war budget over 180 next countries combined, everyone else is waging illegal war. The people who have brought to light war crimes of the US state have been jailed or exiled, Snowden, Manning, Assange and so on but its a lawful state that respects freedom of speech. Its the state that still to this day resorts to torture and holding people without trial yet its land of the free.
stop evry crime
Alternate reality that certain people inhabit 😂
There was provocation in Eastern Ukraine. The bloodshed didn’t start in 2022.
It started in 2014.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
❤😅
NATO pushed east, Russia reacted. I'm shocked. Must be rather pleasant to live your entire profession based on whatever you think you are told. Well read gentlemen. Cultural Marxists. AD 476, before your utopia. Good day. May you, before the very end, See your "Country" and think of Rome.
Shere bs, and a pathetic attempt to cprovide cover for Russia. Before Russia's criminal attack, there was little chance of the Ukraine joining NATO or even the EU. When Ukraine refused to join russia's delapidated and corrupt shere of influence Russia attacked. Russia has no authority in ukraine or any other country. Providing excuses for war crimes says much about you and nothing about western countries. Your support of a pathetic want to be conquerer is ridiculous.
Does that excuse Russia just invading Ukraine? Does it not have self determination and the ability to choose to join nato of its own free will
This is one of the stupidest narratives ever, in no small part because it’s hypocritical, does 9/11 justify all the wars in the Middle East America started? No and that was a much more brazen attack on America than Eastern Europe asking to join nato. (Also to be clear some nations like Poland didn’t just ask to join nato the basically blackmailed their way in they wanted in so bad)
Also this comment is like 70% nonsense lol
@@dewetmaartens359 let's be clear countries voluntarily requested to join NATO no pushing involved. They did because Russia was a threat. Russia does not have the right to invade other countries because it .ay consider that a security problem. in fact there was no security threat to Russia other than its desire to have a sphere of influence. Those countries have every right not to want to be tied to a decaying dictatorship.
Warmongers
stop crime