What's worse? A Skoda Octavia 4th gen in diesel. Drove it a few days back and it was awful. The car did pretty much whatever it wanted. I needed to get moving really quick and it decided to stall since I didn't apply any gas. But the car is supposed to be made for clutch only take-off. I nearly crashed there. Lots of other things I have to say about it but I will hold off for now.
Probably the Trabant was worse than the Yugo. For US market cars, either the Pinto or the Vega. At least from the big 3 car makers. There have been some tiny car companies that made really bad cars, though. Crosley comes to mind. They were a good radio and home appliance and decided to sell cars from their appliance stores.
The worst car that I can think of is the citicar. Or a robin/trident. Basically any reliant car now that I think about it. But the citicar is essentially a fiberglass cheese wedge, with a drill four moped wheels and two used car batteries strapped to it.
The Trabant was at least reliable. In a Trabant you would probably arrive to your destination. Dacia Lastun and Oltcit were so bad and unreliable most of them couldn't complete their first journey, they needed to be repaired after only few kilometers.
id argue the trabant was a worse car. as even though it is probably simpler in every way possible to a normal car, it still manages to constantly brake down
For modern cars* the Effa m100/ideal is the worse car i've seen. Chevy Agile was built after the 08 crash, quite cheap manufacturing. Some say newer Land Rover models with a lot of tech are unreliable, I dunno... *Also the dacia spring/renault kwid is a very cheap project with hollow parts
The body techpool cant be set any lower than two because the car was a 1980 model year, and the body techpool ties into the unlock year. And setting every techpool to -15 means that the technology unlocks are 15 years late..(which is mostly used for the campaign and has next to no used for sand box ,but its fun to have) so basically, you would have made a 1982 bugo, that was running 1967 technology. It would be even worse, however if it was a 1995 bugo running 80s technology. A 2020 car running 2005 tech doesnt sound like the worst option out if the three, Just slap on some focus head lights and a new front facia and your all good.
To me it's definitely a second gen of Skoda Fabia with any of three cylinders. Awfully looking monatrosity with tremendously bad interior (even after five years struggling to find a decent driving position), can't see a crap out of it (especailly at traffic lights it's almost impossible to look at). For its age most of them are getting rusty quite fast. In terms of driving it feels like... nothing good, to say at least. Suspension is there but that's about it. And for a price of a nice one I've managed to get someting a lot more interesting and better in general.
Every luxury expensive car cuz they have features i don't need really. And the worst part they are overpriced af. And i automation any supercar i have tryed to build was a disaster cuz there are no suitable fixtures
Polish Syrena 105 was WAAAY worse than Yugo, Zastavas were one of the better cars on the commie side of iron courtain. Syrena had from its start in 1950's and it had a 2stroke engine that maybe wasnt the worst in its time BUT Syrenas were made without any significant changes up to mid 1980s... There was a long period of time where volkswagen golf was produced and communist goverment in Poland was still making basically a 1940s technology, ladder chassi 2 stroke small sedan. It may look cute to us now, but imagine working your ass off for years in 1970s communist shithole just to afford this car - because there werent many more options where in any western country you could have a normal family car. In short fuck communism and Yugo isnt the worst
Worst car ever made? Ford Model T. Without such a successful and cheap car being manufactured, there would've been a higher chance that we would've made better public transit and developed cities based on walkability and livability instead of suburban sprawl. There would be less pollution, less politics over access to gasoline, less war potentially. Would it make everything better? Absolutely not. Even the suggestions I make about how things might've been better might've been undone by other choices.. but would life be better for everyone? Probably.
So bad it had to be converted to EV, what's worse?
can you please make a car with boxer engine
BUGO with biggest engine as possible please
What's worse?
A Skoda Octavia 4th gen in diesel. Drove it a few days back and it was awful. The car did pretty much whatever it wanted.
I needed to get moving really quick and it decided to stall since I didn't apply any gas. But the car is supposed to be made for clutch only take-off. I nearly crashed there.
Lots of other things I have to say about it but I will hold off for now.
Also for a more objective awful car take a look at en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliance_BS6.
Ain't nothing worse than an ev my man
The Lada Niva finally received a new engine in 2022, but it essentially is still the original engine
Dacia Lastun is the worst car. Lada Niva is a Lexus compared to it. Lada was "one of the best" among Eastern Bloc cars, almost consudered premium.
I never said the Lada Niva was terrible, only answering the question if a car exists that has an engine from ´82.@@mark-sd9br
Nivas are actually quite good offroaders for the money. But it would be awful for everything else
is a good Engine, so why the fuss?
And is still one of the Best Offroaders ever built @@mark-sd9br
The worst car ever is the 1987 Dacia 500, its got 20 horsepower and was so unreliable and dangerous they had to take them all off the road
Probably the Trabant was worse than the Yugo. For US market cars, either the Pinto or the Vega. At least from the big 3 car makers. There have been some tiny car companies that made really bad cars, though. Crosley comes to mind. They were a good radio and home appliance and decided to sell cars from their appliance stores.
But the crosleys are cute!
The worst car that I can think of is the citicar. Or a robin/trident. Basically any reliant car now that I think about it. But the citicar is essentially a fiberglass cheese wedge, with a drill four moped wheels and two used car batteries strapped to it.
The Trabant was at least reliable. In a Trabant you would probably arrive to your destination. Dacia Lastun and Oltcit were so bad and unreliable most of them couldn't complete their first journey, they needed to be repaired after only few kilometers.
@@mark-sd9brThe Yugo's issue wasn't much reliability but it was the whole build quality making it something that fell apart when touching it
Company stole bus seats for a living
When you put a tiny engine in an automation car, it tends to immediately break when put into beamng. Don't know when this started to happen tho.
yeah it's because the hp is too low for it and it can't idle. so the friction and inertia was too high.
id argue the trabant was a worse car. as even though it is probably simpler in every way possible to a normal car, it still manages to constantly brake down
Oh *boy* would it be hilarious if only the passenger side mirror was attached. For maximum convenience.
I believe the Porsche 959 did this.
For modern cars* the Effa m100/ideal is the worse car i've seen.
Chevy Agile was built after the 08 crash, quite cheap manufacturing.
Some say newer Land Rover models with a lot of tech are unreliable, I dunno...
*Also the dacia spring/renault kwid is a very cheap project with hollow parts
"Brand New!" in 1982 and has been sitting in the factory until 2020 when it finally got sold, rust and all. X3
worst car that i know is the "Chang Li"
This is a work of art, also the bugo stickers look awesome on my car and PC lol
The worst car ever made was probably the Trabant. It came with a two-stroke engine and the body was made from recycled garbage.
Worst car ever? Gotta be the VW Beetle.
how do you put interior in the car
19:00 Ford Edsel, Fiat Multipla
The body techpool cant be set any lower than two because the car was a 1980 model year, and the body techpool ties into the unlock year. And setting every techpool to -15 means that the technology unlocks are 15 years late..(which is mostly used for the campaign and has next to no used for sand box ,but its fun to have) so basically, you would have made a 1982 bugo, that was running 1967 technology. It would be even worse, however if it was a 1995 bugo running 80s technology. A 2020 car running 2005 tech doesnt sound like the worst option out if the three, Just slap on some focus head lights and a new front facia and your all good.
The worst car ever has to be the trabant
3:47 those shitty chevy silveradoes
With ultra low hp engines you can open the engine jbeam amd change the friction valve to a lower one and it will happily run
Make a hillclimb version
imo the worst "modern" car still sold today is the Mitsubishi Mirage
Terrible car in my opinion is a ford pinto
The 1979 Electrek Uncar is not particularly great but it's also not terrible. It is just a poor car in many ways.
To me it's definitely a second gen of Skoda Fabia with any of three cylinders. Awfully looking monatrosity with tremendously bad interior (even after five years struggling to find a decent driving position), can't see a crap out of it (especailly at traffic lights it's almost impossible to look at). For its age most of them are getting rusty quite fast.
In terms of driving it feels like... nothing good, to say at least. Suspension is there but that's about it. And for a price of a nice one I've managed to get someting a lot more interesting and better in general.
the worst car i've ever made, didn't just not work, it crashed beamng just activating the mod.......
I'll say Bricklin SV1 It failed miserably.
the rust looks more like oil than rust
Every luxury expensive car cuz they have features i don't need really. And the worst part they are overpriced af.
And i automation any supercar i have tryed to build was a disaster cuz there are no suitable fixtures
You should make a 3 wheeler Race Car 😂😂 ❤❤
This viseo made me a member
I appreciate it!
Kia soul
mmm tasty dorito powder rust, my favorite
citroen ami
Do you have a mod link?
All of them
@@automotiveflux please may I have it?
It could be worse with a 1 liter v8 with maximum of 40hp with a 2 speed automatic gearbox and having first gear the longest making second gear useless
2nd gear will be for fuel efficiency on the high way so you can maybe do 1 miles with 4 gallons of fuel instead of 4.4
@qualcunoacaso4865 good point mabey first gear really short and second gear really long so it's less efficient
Polish Syrena 105 was WAAAY worse than Yugo, Zastavas were one of the better cars on the commie side of iron courtain. Syrena had from its start in 1950's and it had a 2stroke engine that maybe wasnt the worst in its time BUT Syrenas were made without any significant changes up to mid 1980s... There was a long period of time where volkswagen golf was produced and communist goverment in Poland was still making basically a 1940s technology, ladder chassi 2 stroke small sedan. It may look cute to us now, but imagine working your ass off for years in 1970s communist shithole just to afford this car - because there werent many more options where in any western country you could have a normal family car.
In short fuck communism and Yugo isnt the worst
Worst car ever made? Ford Model T. Without such a successful and cheap car being manufactured, there would've been a higher chance that we would've made better public transit and developed cities based on walkability and livability instead of suburban sprawl. There would be less pollution, less politics over access to gasoline, less war potentially.
Would it make everything better? Absolutely not. Even the suggestions I make about how things might've been better might've been undone by other choices.. but would life be better for everyone? Probably.
Fiat multipla
Travant
Bugo