High Court || Family law || Sister's right in brother's property but
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2023
- High Court || Family law || Sister's right in brother's property but
in this video - Sister's right in brother's property but in-law's property should be divided keeping it together family law -What are the rights of a sister? What are the rights of a sister?, daughter's right in mother's property, property dispute between brother and sister, can ancestral property be willed, right of younger in elder brother's property, Indian Succession Act, brother's brother's right in property -Brother-sister relationship is considered to be the sweetest relationship in the world.
Source By : MP High Court
Must Watch
Like
Share & Comment For Latest Updates
Subscribe The Channel & Press The Bell Icon
Email : justiceroom01@gmail.com
Facebook : profile.php?...
Telegram : t.me/+u5BtPvwUnMQ2ZTBlDisclaimer
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.
★ Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
#law #lawyer #judge #judgement #supremecourt #highcourt #mphighcourt
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.76[2/2] เดินมาสิบกว่าป่า วันนี้รู้แล้วว่าโจโฉกลัวอะไร!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R7Yor-t2Au0/mqdefault.jpg)
If daughter wants equal part in parent's property, they should take equal responsibility of parents, physically, emotionally, and financially.
True, but then, even not all sons take that responsibility 😞😞😞
Bs yahi bat kanun ko b bolna chaiye
Correct
I am a married daughter of my parents and I have a brother and a sister got married .The full responsibility of my widow mother depends on me.Even my brother torture her very much.Not all sons are good.
@@KhatunbibiKhatunbibi-br7xy then file a case that you need monthly maintenance from brother for taking care of mother rather than taking their property.... Because this set a wrong example.. for those whose brother is good but sister is cunning...
Sisters can not enjoy the property of both the slides
बहुत सुन्दर फैसला,, जब बहिन की शादी मे भाई और माँ बाप पूरी कमाई खर्च कर देती है, तो बहिन को भी अपने ससुराल की जायदाद पर भाइयों का हक होना चाहिये,,अधिकार केवल एकतरफा क्यों,? क्या मायके वाले जिंदगी भर शादी का कर्ज उतारते रहेंगे,दामाद को दहेज मे सबकुछ देकर भी,
It's wrong to form an opinion. ONE should not be entitled by yours formula. Galat apne self made opinion ladane ka prayaas na kare. Murkho kharcha kiya gaya ladke ke education Shadi par bhi hota hai. Ladaki swechchha se kuch bhi nahi leti. Yah sab aap khud apni shan me anab shanab kharch karate ho. Kharcha is not accountable for one. It's for all. Dont do any bakwas.its illegal investment.
Kuch bhi hi
All non sense
Bhai ghar jamai bhikari hota h humare ghar m saala pde hue h do bhai bilkul neech khun h saalo ka.
Maa baap ki property mein dono ko equal hak hota hai.Bhai ki self earned property par behen ko hak nahi hota aur behen ki self earned property par bhai ko hak nahi hota.
Aapki comment dekhke laga... Kya sirf ladki ki shadi mein kharcha hota hai? Ladke ki shadi mein nahi hota?
कर्ज चुकाने का हिस्सा केवल बेटों को ही मिलेगा हमेशा
Bilkul sahi... Usme koi sath nai ayega...wo bojh akela beta uthaye..
😊sahi kaha usme bhi hissa dena chahiye tab pata chalega
कानून ने अधिकार और कर्तव्य दोनो समान दे रखे है ।
Bilkul sahi kaha aapne..but sabhi kanoon hi male ke khilaf hai
Karz bhi to usi ke liye hota hai
बहुत अच्छा निर्णय,
ससुराल और मायके को मिलाकर बंटवारा हो,
दावा है फिर एक भी शुर्पनखा नजर नहीं आएंगी
कोर्ट में।
Judge sahab thoda bhawna main behkar kanoon ke dayre ke bahir chaley Gaye. Wo agar chaheinge bhi sasural ke sampati ko nahin baant saktey hai.
Right
to bhai ladke ko bhi uske sasuraal se milega..uske sasural me kuch nhi to khudke behen bhi kuch nahi ? 😁aur agar ladki ke jagah ladka hota to yehi krte?
Non sense. Badtameezi ki had. Purush vadi feeling.. Usaki wife bhi Apne Bhai se equal share payegi... Kharcha ladake ki Shadi mebhi hota hai. Falatu bakwaas mat karo
Bhai inn ghar jamaio ka bohot neech khun hota h humare ghar m do pde hue h roj kalesh karti h meri dono bua hissa hissa arey bc ladkio ko thodi ka chhot di sar par chadd ri h bc bkl rndi saali meri buae.
जज.. सहाब का ये निर्णय अच्छा लगा...ताकी किसी बहन बेटी को मोहरा बना के ससुराल वाले किसी की जायदाद हड़प ना करे.
50 ki umra hai bahano ki ab is umra me unhe kya koi mohar banayega ye to bahno ki khud ki greed hai….
तो क्या बहन को पैतृक संपत्ती से बेदखल करके, खुद बहन की पैतृक संपती पर कब्जा करना चाहता है।
और तू बहन को मोहरा बना कर बहन को ससुराल की कब्जा करने के लिए क्यों भेजता है।
@@youtubeuser2565 Jitna bhaiyo ko hissa mila hoga, utna bahno ki shadi me use ho gaya hoga. Toh bahno ko hissa maangna nhi chahiye kabhi father ki property me
ऐसे फैसले होने लगे कोर्ट में पारिवारिक मामला कम जाएगा जज साहब का बहुत बढ़िया फैसला सत सत नमन
केवल बिना सदी सुदा लड़कियों को ही मां बाप की जमीन पर हक मिलना चाहिए। आज कल ससुराल वालो के मन मैं लालच आ जाता है और वो लड़की वालो के परिवार की जमीन पर हक जमाने लगते है। इस तरह से ये एक चैन बन जाती है
Bhai sahab sahmat hu ap ki bat ye hi hona chahiye
Bahan agar arthik roop re kamjor hai aur bhai sabl hoi to unhe v farj bnta hai bahan ki help kre ,it is matter of underdtsnding not quarrel
Agar bhai sakuni mama jesa ho to kya karna chahiye
@@meodme Bahan agar surpnakha ho to
@@meodme agar bahan surpnakha ho tab kya karna chahiye
जज साहब का फैसला बहुत ही महत्वपूर्ण है यह बात ठीक तरह से तर्क संगत है
भाई ,किसके सहारे जिंदा रहेगा, अगर उसके पास जमीन नही होगा तो,भीख मांगेगा या मजदूरी करेगा🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Koi bahan ese nahi mangti unhe apne pita ke sampati ke bare me pta hoga kisi ke ghar ki baat bas wahi janta hai jiske ghar ki bat ho
मेरे यहां तीन बहन और दो भाईयों में बंटवारा हुआ। एक बहन government job वाली और उसकी सिर्फ एक बेटी। और बाकी के दोनो बहने भी पैसे वाले। और जमीन का बंटवारा हुआ बराबर। दोनो भाई बेरोजगार थे।
लूट मचा रखे हैं नारीवाद के नाम पर
@@sonirai7035 acche family mein government job wale se shaadi krne ke bd baap aur bhai kaha se dega bhai
Bhai ke pas Jo bivi ayegi o v apne pita se le skti hai beti beta dono brabr hai to pita ki smpti me dono ka hk barabr hona chahiye
माननीय जज की निष्पक्ष न्याय प्रक्रिया देखा आंखें भर आईं ❤❤❤❤❤
बहुत अच्छा निर्णय विद्वान् न्यायाधीश महोदय का,आप के इसी प्रकार के निर्णयों पर सत्य टिका हुआ है।
Not just following law but preventing misuse of law is equally important …Well Done Sir! 👏👏
And what is the law according to you sir, which is being misused?
@@vivekdas7589 preventing misuse of law by breaking (or misusing) the law? Gajab hei!!
हिंदी लिखने में शर्म आती है या अपने आप को अंग्रेजो का गुलाम अभी भी मानते हो हिंदी लिखो
@@myth-breaker-ww3jh Have you heard of section 498A of IPC ? And the cases related to it ?
Also of cases related to Domestic Violance?
I hope it will clear your doubt regarding mis-use of law if you make a comprehensive study of it.
@@vivekdas7589Have you heard of section 498A of IPC and cases related to it ?
Also of the cases pertaining to Domesti Violence?
Make a proper comprehensive study of the reported cases. Hope that will clear your doubt regarding Mis-use of the Law.
कहा गया भाई बहन का प्यार इसलिए तो कहता हु की ये प्यार व्यार का ढकोसला सादी से पहले होता है सादी के बाद सिर्फ अधिकार होता है कोई प्यार व्यार नही होता है
Girls after marriage : Naa Baap Bada na Bhaiyaa.. Sabse bada rupaiya.. 😄
@@proudindian7568 मां बाप भी जिस बेटे के पास रुपया होता है न उसी को मान सम्मान देता है गरीब के लिए इस दुनिया में किसी के पास कोई जगह नही है चाहे वो मां बाप हो भाई बहन हो या दोस्त यार सब पैसों के आगे सर झुकाते हैं
najriya sudhariye rupya sab jagah Kam nhi ata ,bahan hi rakhi badhegi bhaiya ko
@@proudindian7568correct
@@ashishpatidar9050depend karta hai ki wo bahan bhai ke liye kitna parivarik sonch rakhti hai
जज साहब मेरी दिल की बात कर दिया साहब ने😂
baat hi ki hai.
ऐसा ही फैसला होना चाहिए हर जगह तो हर घर की जमीन बिकाने से बच जाएगी
आज की डेट में इस तरह का कैश बहुत ज्यादा आ रहे हैं अगर कोर्ट अपने फैसले इस तरह सुनने लग जाए तो एक भी बहन कोर्ट में नजर नहीं आएगी
Shree maan judge Sahab ji apne yeh jajmant bahut hi achhi diya hai Sir ji apko sader parnam
बहुत ही सटीक और जलदी मे मामला निपटाने वाला फैसला दिया है माननीय न्यायाधीश महोदय ने
ऐसे फैसले देखके न्यायव्यवस्था पे और भरोसा मजबूत होने लगता है
एक माँ, बाप, भाई अपनी जिंदगी खर्च देते है बेहनो के लिये और वो थोडीसी लालच मे सब रिशते खत्म करने के लिये तैयार हो जाती है, जीन हाथो ने उनकी डोली उठायी होती है उनही हाथो को न्यायालय के चक्कर लगवाती है (हा, ये भी है के सब बेहने एक जैसी नहीं होती)
मैं तो खुद से ही नोटरी से लिखा के पटवारी को दे दी की मुझे भाई के जमीन पर मुझे कुछ भी नहीं चाहिए
@@aniltekam10 मान लो तुम्हारा पति अपनी पैतृक संपत्ती अपने भाई को दान दे दे और तुम्हारे पास पैतृक संपत्ती हो तो उससे शादी करोगी।
अपनी पैतृक संपत्ती अपने भाई को दान करदो। और पति की पैतृक संपत्ती पर गुलछर्रे उड़ाओ।
A Woman is entitled to property share from her Father and her in-law's family too. This means she can get property from two families.
A Man needs to give his family property to his sisters and his own wife irrespective of whether they're together or separated. If he is divorced, and married 2nd time, now he must give property share to his 2nd wife too. So what remains for a man from his ancestral property?
Why does society always hate Men?
The man's wife is also entitled to property from her parents ,hence he also will get share from two families...just like his sister.
He should have an independent claim on the property of his in laws.@@geetanegi2246
Hum ladke hain हमारे sath Aisa he hota hai
Fir v ldko k pas jyada property h ladkiyo se😮
@@chandniverma4314kyuki ladke paisey ki pichey bhagtey hai... E.g agr kisi ldke ko 2 lac per mnth sewage saaf krne ke miley vs 60k office job ke toh bo sewage saaf karega. On the other hand most of the girls will choose to do office job.
This is just an example to tell ki mostly ldke apna interest comfort etc. Nahi dekhtey i know ki sewage saaf krne ke itney paisey nahi miltey
ये जज साहब बहोत. बेहतरीन है यार
बहुत सुंदर जजमेंट इसीलिए जज साहब को ईश्वर का रूप मानते हैं।❤❤
Bhai retarded judgement hai her sasural property if anyone can claim her husband’s sister can. This judge is inventing laws that’s not how law works . If cost of marriage of girl is to be deducted then deduct brother’s education. Usually sister’s not sent for higher education brothers are.
बहने पहले से ही शादी करके दान दहेज में अपना हिस्सा लेकर के जा चुकी है, अब वह दोनों तरफ से लाभ लेना चाहती है उन्हें शर्म आनी चाहिए।
Did you give the equal property in dowry or some gold and gold her to get lost.
@@chanderguptapurva968 why don't they take equal responsibility besides property, shame, bla bla
@@chanderguptapurva968why would he had to give his ancestral land to other lineage it's his ancestral land that's why dowry was came
Kisi v bahan ko dahej nhi do kyoki wo dahej ladki ko nhi milta h balki Paisa or Jamin ko batkr use de Jo use Kam dega
@@sb-bw4lp no need
सर आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद आपके जैसे जज हो तो समाज मे सुधार हो सकता हैं सर बहने कानून का दुरुपयोग कर रही है ससुराल का भी खा रही हैं और मायके का भी ये बहुत गलत हैं एक जगह कहीं मिलना चाहिए या फिर भाई को भी अपनी ससुराल बाली जमीन में से आधा हिस्सा दो दोनो तरफ से खाना तो एक तरह से अन्याय हैं भाई के ऊपर हां पति अगर भगा देता हैं बहन को ससुराल से तो हक लेना चाहिए अन्यथा नही सर आपके फैसले का हम सम्मान करते है अपने बाकई बहुत ही अच्छा कहा बहनों को भी समझ मे आना चाहिए
Ladkiyon ki respect kro koi nhi mangegi kahin aapki patni bhi to nhi khaa rhi h 😂😂
to bhai ladke ko bhi uske sasuraal se milega..uske sasural me kuch nhi to khudke behen bhi kuch nahi ? 😁aur agar ladki ke jagah ladka hota to yehi krte?
Ghar jamai thuu maa ki cho* ghar jamaio ki.
Meri buae apne kapde phad deti h hissa ke chakkar m.
बहेन कभी भी भाई से जायजाद नही मांगती ,वो जब चाहे हक़ से आ, जा सकती है ,आवर हक से सभी चीजों का इस्तेमाल कर सकती है,या अपने लिए साड़ी,कपड़े, गहने के लिए जिद कर सकती है, पर जब ससुराल वाले पैसों के लालच में दबाव बनाने लगे तो मजबूरी में बहेन भईसे संपत्ति में हक मांगती है.
इस मे ज्यादा तर ससुराल वाले दोषी होते है जो पैसो के लिए बहेन ब्लैकमेल करते रहते है.
Agar aisi baat hai to agar ladkiyaan ladko ki respect karengi to ladke bhi property dedenge. To hume ladkiyon ko legally property mein hissedaar banana hi nahi chahiye@@EnderZ9
सर बहुत बहुत अच्छा निर्णय सालों सालों तक याद रखा जाएगा सर जी आपका फैसला अटल है
दहेज एक अपराध है, क्योंकि इससे लड़की के परिवार पर आर्थिक बोझ पड़ता है, तो क्या जब भाई,या भतिजों से उनकी संपत्ति लेकर बेचने से उस परिवार पर कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता।
बहुत अच्छा फैसला किया है ।भाई कहाँ
जाये ।और ससुराल वाले सब छीन कर घर से बाहर कर देते है ।फिर इस भाई के
सर खायें गी।
Excellent 👌 congratulations Respected sir 👍👍👍 well done Congratulations, Really appreciate your Court judgement 💯👌👌💯🎉🎉🎉🎉
जब मां बाप का गुजारा भत्ता केवल लड़के की कानूनी जिम्मेदारी है । फिर मां बाप की जायदाद में लड़की की हिस्सेदारी क्यों या तो मां बाप की जिम्मेदारी भी लड़के लड़की की बराबर हो। मान लो लड़का कोई मां बाप की गंभीर बीमारी का खर्चा उठा रहा हो और उस पर उसने अपनी कमाई तक लगा दी। ऐसे में कानून क्यों नहीं लड़की की भी कानूनी जिम्मेदारी निश्चित करता। हर जगह आदमी का ही बेड़ागर्क किया हुआ है एकतरफा कानूनों ने ।
Ab ye to tum purusho ka hi banaya Hua h brna koi ldki Apne maa baap ko chorkr Ni jaana chahti Apne maa baap Ki seva koun Ni krna chahta
Lol, naatak na karo aunty@@vandanasaxena8979
@@vandanasaxena8979😂 lol kya, joke mara hei
कानून ठीक से पढिये । मॉं बाप की जिम्ममेदारी बेटा और बेटी दोनो की समान है ।
@@anusayakulkarni6773 कृपया मुझे न कानून पढ़ाएं, शायद आपने ठीक से नहीं पढ़ा मैं कानून का विद्यार्थी हूं। बताएं आपने कौन सी धारा पढ़ी है जहां अगर लड़की मां बाप की देखभाल नहीं करेगी या उनको गुजाराभत्ता नहीं देगी तो उसे सजा दी जाएगी। जरा धारा का और सजा का उल्लेख करें।
Great judgement sir 🙏🏻
No daughter wants to take responsibility of their parents and take them to her home but want to take share on their property. Shame.
Ghar le jane ke liye toh sasural wale kvi nhi maante, but haan jo kama rhi hain wo monthly expenses bhej skti hain parents ko.
Aur hissa maangna galat hai kyuki unki shadi me already laakho kharch ho jate hain.
You can't put Every daughter in same category by saying no daughter, there are many daughters who take responsibility of their parents, sath nhi v rkh pati hain toh unke kharche ka responsibility leti hain. Sbko ek taraju me na taule, kyuki kaafi bete v hote hain jo property v lete hain aur khayal v nhi rkhte parents ka. That's also shameful
@@Ananya-ex7jkThat's the same thing I want to say that every case can be different. Daughters should claim or parents should give their portion at the time of marriage or make a proper will, much before their death so that brothers know the situation very well in advance. They will be aware that there is no value in contributing sister's marriage and carrier. So they will spend the same money on their carrier instead of their sister's. So that they should not sacrifice their own carrier to make their sister's carrier and not spend their money on sister's marriage instead of spending the same to make their own carrier. I have not seen any sister in my life that keeps their parents with them because they assume that, it's responsibility of their brother but I have seen many sisters who're claiming and get share of parent's property. If sister live sapreately in their own home and brother give some money to their parents, they denies this responsibility, so where is the equality for brother and sister as the supreme court claim. Supreme court should also take the responsibility of daughter's marriage and carrier and after that brother/s should not have any issue to give their portion in property. I have seen many case where a portion of property was sold out for the expenses of daughter's marriage and after several years the same daughters came out to claim the property where their brother were living and earings a small amount of money as rent but now all this income is stopped and brothers were compelled to live in a rented house without any job and business. Now the property would be sold out and sister will take the advantage of supreme court's decision without taking care of parent's last day. All of their families are shattered out with no relationship among them. After all this, I must advocate in favour of sister that they should consider to take an appropriate portion of property only if they have problem from their husband's side and without distrubing the life of their brother.
Great judgement by justice bansal ji
This is why dowry is necessary. For every marriage both girl and boy should get their rights on property or money equivalent to it. No questions or negotiations later. Marriage to be registered along with property registration. Nothing to be given to in laws. Clause to supports parents in old age or otherwise to be specifically mentioned. If not done children shall indemnify parents.
Coming soon
आजकल यह भी तकड़ा लफड़ा है ।। ससुराल की सम्पत्ति कोई देना ना चाहीगी ओर भाई की सम्पत्ति में सबको हक चाहिए ।।
ऐसा हुआ तो सब अपनी बहनों की शादी करोड़पति के करेगे ।। इसके बहुत दुषपरिणाम होगे ।। गरीब लडको की शादी ना होगी ।। भाई बहन के रिश्ते खराब होगे आदि आदि
बहुत सुंदर फैसल भाई सर आपने बहुत अच्छा किया 🙏🙏🙏
bahut achchha faisla Manniya ji ka Salute to Banta h sir ji ko Jai hind
सर बहुत बहुत अच्छा फैसला है ससुराल में भी रहती है जमीन फिर भी मायके अधिकार लेती है तो कर उसके भाई कहां जाएंगे भाइयों के लड़के कहां जाएंगे
Jab inke pati ki bahen inke saas sasur ki property me hissa mangne lage to inko bahut bura lagega
@@shivendrakumar7739 उसको भी मांगना चाहिए। पिता की संपत्ती मे बाप का हक होता।
Revolutionary judgement.hats off sir.
जय जय श्री सीताराम । में जज साहेब को प्रणाम करता हूं । बहुत सुंदर निर्नय लिया है ऐसा ही फेसला होना चाहिए ।
👌Very good Judgement
Thought of actual justice
भगवान् ऐसी बहने किसी को ना दे
Great Judgement!
Although there are many valid cases, there are also some exceptions. In one such case in my family, After their fatherc and son died, the sisters teamed up to divide the share and trying to kick the daughter-in-law and her children out. In the family, it is the daughter in law who earned and puts food on the table for everyone at her in-laws home. Takes care of the father in-law and the mother in-law in old age and She cares for the husband when he is prolonged illness took over, she bears responsibility of old parent thinking that they are her father and mother, children also suffer from depression because of dramatic family tortures by the sisters and poverty while no sister helped.
There is no doubt that daughters have a right to want, but only if they understand and fulfill their parents' responsibilities and cooperate during difficult times of the families. If that isn't the case, greed can take over. Greed can lead daughters to make selfish decisions and put their own desires before the family's needs. This can create tension and discord in the family and cause long-term damage to relationships. Therefore, daughters should strive to balance their own wants with their parents' expectations.
If you have read the law and landmark judgement of the court on this issue. You must have known, that upon getting their due share in property, the daughters are equally bound by the liabilities of the paternal family as well.
About responsibility of parents. After the death of the head of the family the wife is a equal shareholder of the property along with sons and daughters .
@@vivekdas7589 It’s not about equal share when you loose the basic right to housing, you don’t have a roof anymore but a share that you never wanted.
@@LifeSense360 Since you are giving a specific example I will respond to that only. If the case is so that the 'only property' inherited by a brother and sister is their paternal house and the brother is living there. There is no law in India or principle of law which says that the brother shall be asked to dispose off that house or divide the share of the house. The brother might be asked to make monetary compensation as against the share of the sister. Equality and equity are two different things.
@@vivekdas7589 This make sense. Thank you for the opinion.
@@LifeSense360 I can assure you sir the law of the land always make sense. Yes it cannot please everyone out there but it always will make sense, or else it will lose its authority and command or it will be struck down by courts
Sir aap ko meri umar lag jaaye aapne bahut achha faishla diya kabhi jhumka kabhi kabbhi kagan or pata nahi kya kya par dhamki milti rahti hai
Judge sahab Thug-life me poora mamla lapet diya ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤great Work Sir🤗🤗😇🤗😇🤗😇🤗🤗
Most great Judge ever i have seen
अक्सर देखा जाता है कि कुछ बहिनें, बुआ ससुराल जाने के बाद अपने भाई व भतिजों के सामने बहुत बड़ी बड़ी मांगे रखने लगती जब तक उनकी मांगे (महंगे कपड़े, गहने,नोट)पूरी होती तब तक सब सही चलता है । और अंत में लोभ लालच के आगे रिश्ते हार जाते हैं।
Mai behen hu or mai mangungi property.. riste kyu haar jaate hai.
Mere bhai ko t9 dikkat nhi ghar mujhse share karne me.. wo bolta hai k didi nhi to bhai hota to ussey share karne me dikkkat nhi or ladki hai to sara bojh ladki k upar., bhai property deke mahaan ban jaaye.. mai jaha shadi karungi waha bhi property me husband ki sis ko property dene ki baat karungi…dowry nhi dungi lekin.. arrange na ho.. ladka khud se dhundh k kar lu… lekin ek rupya dowry nhi.. dono side barabar expenses me involve honge
bolne mai bahut acha lagta h ye sb
@@ubantu8987kyu bhai ancestral land kyu dei dusrou kou
@@ubantu8987 सही बोली पिता की संपत्ती मे हिस्सा लेना और दहेज मत देना।
लड़की को पिता की संपत्ती मे हिस्सा नही मिलता इसीलिए दहेज दिया जाता है।
फिर लोगो को सिर्फ दहेज दिखता है। और लड़के को लालची कहने लगते है।
ये नही दिखता की लड़की को पैतृक संपत्ती मे हिस्सा नही मिला। इसलिए दहेज मिला है।
Yese hi turant sahi satik nyay k jarurat h aam janta ko manniya nyaydhish ji n sahi upay diya.
Bahut sahi wakil sahab Maan gaye ap ko
Excellent sir 🎉
Great judgement sir...
बहुत सुन्दर सर जी
आप जैसे न्यायधीश हो तो सर अभी कोई अपराध करे ही नही
bilkul sahi baat boli Manniya judge Saheb ji ne great job sir ji
reality is sister don't want property, her husbands and in laws are culprit
Right bro
Husband doesn't get property but children gets it..
बहुत अच्छा फैसला है 👌
बहुत सुंदर जज साहब आपने फैसला किया एक किसान भाई ने प्यार से अपनी तीन बहनों की शादी की न जाने कितने साल तो कर्जे के नीचे दबा रहा होगा और बहने आज हिस्सा मांग रही है तो बहनों का जो हिस्सा है ससुराल में उसमे की आधा दे दे भाई को कर ले बटवारा
The great 👍 jaj sahab
Offer hi offer he 🤣
What a JUDGMENT SIR🙏
जमीन जायदाद में हिस्सा मांग लेती है लेकिन कभी जिम्मेदारी में भी हिस्सा मांगे
जज साहब बहुत बहुत 🙏💕न्याय ⚖ वाली बात
बहुत अच्छा फैसला किया आपने यही होना भी चाहिए भारत माता की जय सत्य की जीत हुआ जब भाई ने अपनी कमाई पिता की कमाई सब मिला कर बहन की शादी किये तो पिता के संम्पत्ती मे अब क्यों हिस्सा दिया जाय
very good judge sahab.
That was a Great Talk
Very well handled 🌟🌟
पहले पढ़ाओ, फिर लाखो शादी मैं लगाओ,फिर आधी प्रॉपर्टी भी ले जाओ,गजब,यहां से भी लो अपने बच्चे के लिए फिर ससुराल से भी लो,सही कहा ससुराल से बहन को जो मिल रहा है उसका हिस्सा भाई के साथ शेयर करो,
या समाज की व्यवस्था ये होनी चाहिए,लड़की को पढ़ाओ,शादी मैं खर्चा कम करो,दहेज न दो,और फिर बहन के हिस्से मैं जो आता है वो उसको दो ।
Dekho bhaiya agar ladki apne parents ka khayal bhi rakhe aur bhatiji bhatijo aur ghar me paise lagati rahe to phir us case me boliye kya kehte hai?
Ladke ko bhi padhate hai, shaadi dahej ka comparison property se nahi ho sakta hai. Waise ladke ke shaadi mein bhi kharcha hota hai. Law daughters ko share deti hai pushtaini property mein, pata nahi judgement kaunse law par based hai.
Ladko ko, bhooka nanga, a pad hee rakhtr hai kya Maa bap. Unki b shadiya karate hain. Aur agar ladki ko dahej dete hain, to ladko dahej dilate bhi hai Maa bap.
@@newsjunkieish ladka ma baap ka khyal bhe rakhta ha most of the cases..
There is no law to spend millions in marriage. But, there is law of equal property distribution among all kids regardless of gender. Parents should consider writing WILL to allocate property after counting marriage money. In absence of WILL, everything goes into equal parts.
Bahut acha fasla bahut ache judge shab
Nice justice. Well ye hi judge h jinki voice clear h
GREAT JUDGEMENT
Bahoot badhia baat kaha hai judge sahab ne
Wahoo kya baat khi aapne sukun Mila ki aap jese bi h loog
Very nice jas sahab ka fesla
Bilkul sahi faisla hai, lekin judge sahab ka final faisala tamaam investigation ke baad hi dena chahiye
High court is doing good job sir ❤🌹🔥🙏
Bhut achha nyay mila h
लालची लडकिया माईका और ससुराल दोनों घर बर्बाद कर देती है🙏
Salute to you justice sir
Jaj ne dil khus kar diya😅😅
जज साहब बिल्कुल सही फेसला ससुराल का भी हिस्सा हो क्युकी महिला को तो दोनो जगह मिलते हैं पुरुष को भी हो
पुरुष अपनी बीबी से बोले अपने पिता की संम्पती मे हिस्सा ले आए।
बहन की ससुराल की संपत्ती मे भाई का हक नही है।
बहन भाई की ससुराल की संपत्ती मे हिस्सा थोड़ी मांग रही है।
Bahen ke sasural se to bahen ki nanad ko milegi. Jisme pati ki bahen ka adhikar hai.
बहुत अच्छा फैसला ।🎉🎉🎉
Great
Very nice Judgement 👌
लानत है ऐसी बहेनों पर
@@manishasilver बेटियो का हक ससुराल में भी और मायके में भी ये वाला समाज भी अच्छा है
@@manishasilver Laanat hai apki soch par jo saural or apne bhai k ghar dono jgah hisse mange.
@@manishasilver किसने कहा बेटियां खाली हाथ जाति है,शादी मैं बाप को कर्ज दे जाति है,फिर बेटे उस कर्ज जो जिंदगी भर चुकाएंगे,और फिर प्रॉपर्टी मैं हिस्सा भी लेंगी,शादी मैं खर्चा मत करो अपनी बहन को दो।
@@sanjeevrawat2693 apni beti ko padao apne cheap thoughts .n this is a platform to express one's opinions not to get personal okay.
@@Currectup karz de jati hai , koi badi baat nahi ki kyun betiyo ko bhoj samaj kar paida hote hee maar Diya jata hai. Yesi language bolne Wale Aaj bhi yese log hai hamare mahan bharat main .what a shame !
Very right for brothers saport. Thanks jaj
Bahut hi acha faisla diya hai aapne🙏🙏🙏🙏
Supreme court has given a unfair judgement in Vinita Sharma case this is all happening because of that one judgement what will happen after one generation when children of sister will start demanding share in property being children of coparcener.
Calm down the judgement was correct
@@gdhanushreddy9548all the judgment have other aspects...! That's why after some time many judgment changes..., Give a thought !
@@gdhanushreddy9548 the sons are committing suicides.The boys are becoming criminals, only because of this law
@@gdhanushreddy9548 This judge does not know the law. And judgement should be given as per Book of Law, not as per personal feelings. Under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 the daughter by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son.
He has not passed judgment…he is bringing them back to the negotiating table. Also, Not only follow law but preventing misuse of law is also his responsibility so he has done right.
Law got updated but mentality remains same...
Sir aapki baat bhut sahi hai 👍
Wow
What a great judgement
Feeling Proud of having great judge. Shame on those sisters.
Equal right ho.
Ek pita se janma do bachchom ko equal rights milem.
Na Bhai ka biibi ka hissa bahen ko milem ya bibi ka husband ka hissa Bhai ko milem.
Milem to Maata pita ka sampatti ka hissa barabar milem.
Very good judge....
Shukr h ye property ka mamla tha
Agr koi criminal case hota to ye judge to victim ki jindagi barbad kr dete
Didi ki jal.gai
Father should have given some share to daughters also
सही न्याय किया जज साहब ने..
Right if demanded. prosecution helps. but in justice of moral not in force by law thanks a lot judge decission
I don't understand the clip , daughter is a coparcener to ancestral property as per the Hindu succession act 1956 and post Vinita Sharma vs Rakesh sharma SC VERDICT AND since when a brother has right in sister's husband 's property ? I don't understand the context here
You will never understand, his father died early when her brother was small. He took responsibility of his family he did took expense of all three sister, mother of the daughter living with boy, and she did gave statment that her brother is took care of them all. Now the sister is asking for their part in property.
@@arunkumar-vd7nf how would I know, imagination?
Still in an undivided family is quite common and natural to elders look after the younger ones that doesn't give them any right over their property!
@@adithyahk yes but case goes in many ways my dear 1. Possession of property 2.mothers share is willed or not 3. Any self acquired property 4. Who were gaurdian of those all sisters before marriage
Wow. Court is manipulating the law.
For good it's better to do fare judgment rather than giving judgment based on biased laws 😂
Perfect ❤
Great decison sir
I am amazed to see what the judge is trying to do here. I really want to know the context here behind his such statements. But what amazes me more as to how he thinks he can threaten a party to get a compromise decree or else will face the undue delay in the matter. This is highly unwarranted on part of a member of the bench. If he thinks a more just solution is available beyond the limits of law , he can suggest it or decide whatever is allowed within the boundaries of law. But a threat of such nature is deeply concerning.
This judge does not know that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (39 of 2005) was updated to remove gender discriminatory provisions in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Under the amendment, the daughter of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son.
He is stating the facts and not threatening…
Make them realise and come to senses as they do not have any possessions..
Great approach by the Judge here settle and remain happy or else face taarikh pe taarikh and keep on paying your lawyers.
@@atulkothari1999 Bro. Being an advocate I can with utmost certainty tell you Whatever he stated is both legally and ethically wrong
Totally agreed he is so offended as if he is giving by his own pocket...such a pathetic attitude of resolving the issue...
@@vivekdas7589 Advocate sir Lagta hai aapki Mataji ne aapke Mamaji ko Lutne ka Prayas kiya hai joki har Womens kar Rahi hai apne Ghar ko Lut rahi hai . 🙏🏻
Me avi admit kar lunga phir ladte rehna 20 saal tak.
This is the reality of indian courts and judges
Great decision ❤