Optional food... I forget to build food production buildings every mission, cause I dont need to do it. And why should I build foresters if there are regrowing trees everywhere. The game is not a building or economy game. It's an early access rts wirh some building and economy aspect.
As much as I love the old settlers for the economy building. I do like battles, and didn’t find the combat at all exciting in the old ones. So this one does look fun to me!
We want to build, to relax, to watch our villages and residents come to life, like the good old Settlers we have all loved. If we want combat, we would play Age of Empires IV, thank you very much Ubishit!
Damn you're harsh.. What if you just say that the combat is a feature YOU don't necessarily need (instead of including the whole community using "we") + no need to insult a company of more than 21 000 people for this. Have a great day
@@AdrienLePianiste35 Even Ubisofts own playtests have shown that the majority of The Settlers - players play it for some relaxing city-building (because at its heart, The Settlers has always been a city-builder with RTS elements, not the other way around). Yet Ubisofts executives have decided to transform a game that was looking great three years ago (alledgedly the combat mechanics didn’t work) into an RTS that is neither a The Settlers game nor a good RTS.
@@quuaaarrrk8056 hey there, thanks for providing a bit of context and being respectful. I'd be curious to know how you get access to these play tests documents. I understand some might be nostalgic of the good old The Settlers but what if the team wanted to explore something different? It is not "The Settlers remaster" and, after reading couple of other comments, it seems like there are also enthusiastics for this new proposition, even if it is halfway between "old The Settlers" and a classic RTS. To be honest, I wrote my comment because I'm tired of this overexagerated and sometimes blind hate about this company. I know some people who worked on the game and it is heartbreaking to see this message as a top comment (which is basically the same bellow all the Ubisoft's announcements). It feels like there's a group of haters, waiting for the next announcement, to say "oh Ubish*t blabla". The company has lost the trust of a part of its players, sure.. But does it deserve this automatic and overexposed aversion?
I was hesitant with this game because of all the negative comments and videos surrounding this, primarily in beta, so I paid for the ubisoft subscription and played the earlier settlers games prior to launch. What I found is that this is indeed a settlers game. It is not an AoE game or SC2 like people keep saying. It is still a relaxed supply chain management game. It is not exactly like any prior settlers game, but I can clearly see the inspiration from previous titles in the franchise. I think that the big problem with this franchise is that they have had so many variations on the core concept, and that a lot of people are upset it is not THEIR settlers that they wanted. I’d liken it akin to every new Civilization game. Typically the last one has great reviews and the new one the die hards don’t like and give it bad reviews for a while. It is still a relaxed pace game. Some people wanted the settlers 7, others wanted 3 or 4, and I just wanted a settlers game. I got it and I’m glad. Maybe the pvp sucks, but I never played a settlers game for that so I can’t comment on that aspect.
Why is this game called settlers? It’s not settlers. It’s just another rts game. Supply chains are long gone. Food and tools are useless and mines are unlimited…..
Just don't build too much or you will reach the pop cap real soon. This is one of the most generic and boring RTS out there. It's also not a settlers game. It's an abomination (in my opinion).
so they made a an Age of Empires game with a Settlers title? then why not cal it what it is.. its not a Settlers game its only themed that way.. id say why not call it Age of Settlers
I am looking forward to it, from reviews can you maybe go back more to the old system of upgrading troops, feeding miners and stuff like that. 3 & 4 were the golden age! please rethink before you launch !!! also can you please relaunch 3&4 so we can play on our updated tech!
You know what else was the backbone, food, guess the carriers are bored not have to take food to the miners. You know what else was the backbone, water, because you know you need water to make bread, but not in this version, lazy carriers.... You know what else was the backbone, meat, but because the carriers are lazy the ranch can just make meat without a butchers. So why are carriers a backbone? They've noting to do....
by not fixing this whilst saying they listened to the feedback of last years demo you can already tell This feedback your giving them.. they wont read it or do anything with. as i know this stuff was part of the Critigues of that demo.
Oh wow, it's coming to consoles too, good. I wonder if we can play without being harassed by other factions. The settlers have always been my chill-to-play game.
Ihr habt aus diesem Spiel eine Lachnummer gemacht, ich werde es mir definitiv nicht kaufen, dieses Spiel hat rein gar nichts mit den Siedlern zu tun. /// You made a joke out of this game, I will definitely not buy it, this game has absolutely nothing to do with the settlers.
It's only new if you're new to Settlers, the carriers was there 30 yrs ago. Just because you are thirteen it's no excuse to not learn some effing history. Educate yourself child, before trying to put something down.
@@Skankhunt668 A The Settlers without carriers is not a The Settlers. Then again, neither is a The Settlers which is a RTS instead of a City-Builder. Nonetheless, carriers is the one thing in this game that is not to be criticised.
![(Full Gameplay) Northgard Story Mode [Normal] - No Commentary | Chapter 2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YysN4OYNHrg/mqdefault.jpg)
Why do you keep destroying the settlers series?
Optional food...
I forget to build food production buildings every mission, cause I dont need to do it.
And why should I build foresters if there are regrowing trees everywhere.
The game is not a building or economy game. It's an early access rts wirh some building and economy aspect.
As much as I love the old settlers for the economy building. I do like battles, and didn’t find the combat at all exciting in the old ones.
So this one does look fun to me!
Paid comment?
We want to build, to relax, to watch our villages and residents come to life, like the good old Settlers we have all loved. If we want combat, we would play Age of Empires IV, thank you very much Ubishit!
You cry babies sound pathetic at this point you have known for awhile now this was the direction they were taking so shut up and don't by it
Typical Ubisoft hater. clown
Damn you're harsh.. What if you just say that the combat is a feature YOU don't necessarily need (instead of including the whole community using "we") + no need to insult a company of more than 21 000 people for this. Have a great day
@@AdrienLePianiste35 Even Ubisofts own playtests have shown that the majority of The Settlers - players play it for some relaxing city-building (because at its heart, The Settlers has always been a city-builder with RTS elements, not the other way around). Yet Ubisofts executives have decided to transform a game that was looking great three years ago (alledgedly the combat mechanics didn’t work) into an RTS that is neither a The Settlers game nor a good RTS.
@@quuaaarrrk8056 hey there, thanks for providing a bit of context and being respectful. I'd be curious to know how you get access to these play tests documents. I understand some might be nostalgic of the good old The Settlers but what if the team wanted to explore something different? It is not "The Settlers remaster" and, after reading couple of other comments, it seems like there are also enthusiastics for this new proposition, even if it is halfway between "old The Settlers" and a classic RTS.
To be honest, I wrote my comment because I'm tired of this overexagerated and sometimes blind hate about this company. I know some people who worked on the game and it is heartbreaking to see this message as a top comment (which is basically the same bellow all the Ubisoft's announcements). It feels like there's a group of haters,
waiting for the next announcement, to say "oh Ubish*t blabla". The company has lost the trust of a part of its players, sure.. But does it deserve this automatic and overexposed aversion?
this dont look like settlers, it looks more like a mix of age of empire and a little settles... dont like it (and i bought all the old settles)
Was about to buy this one but then i noticed there is coins which you can buy.. so no thanks.
Just say you're broke and move on.
@@ABOneOG Just say you're supporting how corporate greed is destroying an entire industry and move on.
YOU USED DEVELOPERS THAT DONT LIKE SETTLERS
So... the carriers don't know about wheels?
I was hesitant with this game because of all the negative comments and videos surrounding this, primarily in beta, so I paid for the ubisoft subscription and played the earlier settlers games prior to launch.
What I found is that this is indeed a settlers game. It is not an AoE game or SC2 like people keep saying. It is still a relaxed supply chain management game.
It is not exactly like any prior settlers game, but I can clearly see the inspiration from previous titles in the franchise.
I think that the big problem with this franchise is that they have had so many variations on the core concept, and that a lot of people are upset it is not THEIR settlers that they wanted.
I’d liken it akin to every new Civilization game. Typically the last one has great reviews and the new one the die hards don’t like and give it bad reviews for a while.
It is still a relaxed pace game. Some people wanted the settlers 7, others wanted 3 or 4, and I just wanted a settlers game. I got it and I’m glad.
Maybe the pvp sucks, but I never played a settlers game for that so I can’t comment on that aspect.
They made it a fuking RTS pvp game so nothing like settlers.
Why is this game called settlers? It’s not settlers. It’s just another rts game. Supply chains are long gone. Food and tools are useless and mines are unlimited…..
ubisoft always dropping something different! love it
Did they pay you to say this? Or are you a dev of this game?
The carriers aren’t new tho, didn’t the very first settlers game have carriers? Just doesn’t seem anything different from previous Settlers games.
Well yeah, it’s part of the series core gameplay so of course it’s going to be there.
Ye except it's not on pc? I dont see it on Steam.
@@podrac8830 dude, why do you reply like this to every steam related comment? Awkward!
@@GameUnion because he's being helpful to the guy that asked a question???
@@yoyoyopistachio3320 the guy asked about Steam, not Eww Games Store
Just don't build too much or you will reach the pop cap real soon. This is one of the most generic and boring RTS out there. It's also not a settlers game. It's an abomination (in my opinion).
It takes over an hour+ to reach the pop cap. Stop talking nonsense.
Стратегий сейчас дефицит. Ни то, что 30 лет назад. Тогда только в них и играл. Эх, беззаботное детство:)
I miss the farmers as we had 20 years ago.
so they made a an Age of Empires game with a Settlers title?
then why not cal it what it is.. its not a Settlers game its only themed that way.. id say why not call it Age of Settlers
Age of Settlers.
I am looking forward to it, from reviews can you maybe go back more to the old system of upgrading troops, feeding miners and stuff like that. 3 & 4 were the golden age! please rethink before you launch !!! also can you please relaunch 3&4 so we can play on our updated tech!
Die Siedler 3 and 4 are on the Ubisoft store (modernized)
Can’t find the game on PlayStation store ?!?
You know what else was the backbone, food, guess the carriers are bored not have to take food to the miners.
You know what else was the backbone, water, because you know you need water to make bread, but not in this version, lazy carriers....
You know what else was the backbone, meat, but because the carriers are lazy the ranch can just make meat without a butchers.
So why are carriers a backbone? They've noting to do....
@Collin Lutz 2.5 on metacritic, think they already are
by not fixing this whilst saying they listened to the feedback of last years demo you can already tell This feedback your giving them.. they wont read it or do anything with.
as i know this stuff was part of the Critigues of that demo.
Holy this is ****
We dont want a settler rts wtf xD
Ubisoft:
NEW feature 'save your game in singleplayer' xD
Reminds me of warcraft 2!
FINALLLYYY
R.E.S.P.E.C.T
waiting for this one :)
Oh wow, it's coming to consoles too, good. I wonder if we can play without being harassed by other factions. The settlers have always been my chill-to-play game.
Looks amazing
Steam?
I WANT MY MONEY BACK !
I was really looking foword for this game but since they have been annoying with release dates I wount be spending my money on it 🖕
😢, I'm sure we are all sad about this event.
Can we get this on steam please
12 years and this is the best you come up with? 😂
this looks great I'm gonna play it !
Don’t it sucks, graphics are the only thing that are good.
Wohhoo let's go!!!
It's look like good old "the settlers" with new graphic
yeah... it's not.
It’s not only the graphics are good
RIP Settlers* :((
Because you guys fired the original developer and didn't listen to fans, I'm going to torrent this haha
im not even going to do that.. but if i have an itch i just play the old games again
F2p when?
Where the hell is Steam version?!
@@podrac8830 yikes
@@podrac8830 who cares about Epic? Have anyone asked you about it?
Je suis assez curieux de ce jeu.
Pk?
Age of empires! Ça du sens
This Game is not Worth to have the name The Settlers in it. Such a disappointment in Logistics, Resources and City-Building.
Such a variety content love you Ubisoft 🥰
Just stop it please, do everyone a favor and delete it from the stores and call back all copies.
I remember the settlers à game more than 20 years ago. This should come to PlayStation
mate... 4:34
Not worth it it’s nothing like settlers it only looks like it,.
Why is the video title in German? The video is in English.
Because you are german TH-cam auto translated it for you
Failed
does anyone know if it will come for ps5?
you still haven't answered when the rainbow six mobile will be released approximately
Yes sir
When do they release a mobile version?
Hopefully never
Ihr habt aus diesem Spiel eine Lachnummer gemacht, ich werde es mir definitiv nicht kaufen, dieses Spiel hat rein gar nichts mit den Siedlern zu tun. /// You made a joke out of this game, I will definitely not buy it, this game has absolutely nothing to do with the settlers.
This should be a cozy economy building game, what a waste
Ive played like 10 games this year that had this exact "New system of cariers" you are not slick by copying code.
It's only new if you're new to Settlers, the carriers was there 30 yrs ago. Just because you are thirteen it's no excuse to not learn some effing history. Educate yourself child, before trying to put something down.
@@AchazZuberle calm down grandpa its just a video game
@@Skankhunt668 You sit when you pee!
@@Skankhunt668 A The Settlers without carriers is not a The Settlers. Then again, neither is a The Settlers which is a RTS instead of a City-Builder.
Nonetheless, carriers is the one thing in this game that is not to be criticised.
@@quuaaarrrk8056 its just aoe citizens nothing special
shame on you, you destroyed the settlers series forever
اللعبة ماتشتغل
yes butt not on steam
Why no steam or marketing? Why you want to die Ubisoft?
A lot of sources stated they just don't have them anymore
@@podrac8830 epic exclusive = dead game
@@podrac8830 you are not OK, if you believe so. Epic = 💩
Go away with your negative vibes