Folks, there was a marathon at Union Glacier recently. Theoretically, there were at least 40 other people there at the same time who could confirm or disprove anything suspicious. Who’s willing to track some of them down and talk to them?
Do you think they'll have the 24hr sun on there??? If not, why not??? Was the weather no good, and then the weather just magically cleared for sun god RA and TFE!!!
@daizyflower272 What does that other camera have to do with anything? Can you tell me whose camera that was and what it was doing? You have no idea. It is wild to me that your first reaction to seeing something not behave the way you think it should - based purely on assumptions you have made - is "CGI" and not "I wonder what that camera is doing, Maybe I could find out what is going on".
Why does the camera tracking the Sun's movement all of a sudden stop following the Sun and tracks back at 0:47 seconds. Perhaps the Sun was no longer visible for it to track, despite the video showing the Sun high in the sky.
That was 25 hours after the start of the video. It already passed where it had started. The video stops when it is over a small peak. The video started before the sun had reached that peak the day before. This shows MORE than a full day of sun.
I see what you are saying now. That said, do you know whose camera it is and what they intended for it to do? What does some other camera have to do with the point of the time lapse that this camera took? There were several people there with various different camera setups capturing various things. My recommendation would be to ask Dave McKeegan about that camera as he probably knows whose camera that was and what it was doing.
This is the video I was on about mate with the strange shadows 21seconds and 34seconds 34 seconds especially… with the antenna shadow on the hut vs the mini tripod bottom left before they remove the mini tripod the antenna shadow sure does whip round quickly compared to it
Also, why does the slr type camera on the tracking device suddenly dip down then it looks like it turned back to the right… I am pretty sure this was jeranism’s camera
@@antonyplatt1869 It started before, and finished before. Some thought the light shone down the side from a/the sun shining from the east, but it was the camera turning.
@JohnArmagh-s5v They are referring to the weather webcam that is brought up. Which, from what I can see, just shows mountains with the light coming from different directions at a few times of the day.
@@SergeiMaltsev Wow! Those goalposts moved quickly! First you claimed that there was no reflection. Now you say there’s not enough reflection. #ContradictionAlert
@@fepeerreview3150 The southernmost point of the sun is the Tropic of Capricorn and Antarctica is further away the sun never reaches the coast, much less circumnavigates it
It is not a glarey mess. The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back). Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@nofanfare7426 Agree that it isn't conclusive on it's own, but my gut tells me it will lead to something that is. I'm sharing to all my channels and contacts
I wld have expected it to go a bit darker at some point... like twilight or something... but it just seemed to stay at a particular level of brightness. Also.. was expecting it a few days later at the solstice??
Could've been clear on their day, IDK. The timelapse only gives 6 days out of 30. It's just an idea for others to look at things to see what they can find. However the 6 days don't look good.
Psst: Those guys are 700 mi away from the pole. You might as well tell us you think it was cloudy in New York City because you checked the weather in Indiana.
@@nofanfare7426 Stellarium predictions match McKeegan's video perfectly. Whatever mismatch you've stitched together here is either because you don't know how to use the software or because you can't edit footage properly.
@@Peter-o9n6p LOL!!! You're ODing on the copium that bad that you're commenting on the wrong video. OR! Watch my next video where Stellarium may just destroy it.
@@primonomeultimonome 0:41 that tripod closest to you with the big camera is an overlay, notice the short legs don't even touch the groundshadows going in almost opposite direction in the same frame, and in another clip most of the tripods had no shadow! LoL! It doesn't take much to fool a globe fundy like you. Let alone the fact that we see south west sunsets as far south as you can go, tell us at what latitude do we look north for 24 hours to see a backwards moving sun? flatearthclassroom.blogspot.com/2019/01/antarctica.html You have nothing.
@@rocketspushoffairThe only thing I noticed is that you either need to get a pair of eyeglasses or to learn how to use TH-cam properly. On a second thought, you'd better stop drinking altogether. 😂
The place on Earth where the sun is directly overhead is called the subsolar point. The subsolar point is on the equator in September. Then it spirals gradually southwards completing one circuit of the Earth each day, towards the Tropic of Capricorn - causing the 24-hour sun inside the Antarctic Circle. Then it gradually spirals back towards the equator which it crosses in March. It continues spiralling northwards towards the Tropic of Cancer in June, causing the 24-hour sun inside the Arctic Circle. Then it starts to spiral back towards the equator for the next September. The sun is never overhead north of the Tropic of Cancer, nor south of the Tropic of Capricorn.
Thought that when I first saw the analema. I couldn't see how it could be seen from, say, out from South America, Australia and South Africa (On an AE Projection). Flat Works did a vid on a Zetetic Map, I didn't get to watch it all, to biz.
@@wideawake2814 - unfortunately we have measured the ground speed of the subsolar point - it is at its slowest over the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn - about 952mph - and fastest along the equator - about 1038mph. And that most definitely does not work on a flat Earth.
orange oversnow vehicle that comes into sight around 0.32, if any of you can zoom in with high definition and check out its shadow. Looks a lot different to the one cast by the blue shed just in front of it, but it may just be perspective and distance??
@@andrewjohnston6631 Tracks on oversnow vehicles l have seen don't stick out that much wider than the body. If so its only about a tyre width, when you compare its shadow to the blue building, the buildings shadow is substantially more obvious due to the depth of it. ANd when you look how long the shadows cast by the camera tripods are, this vehicle shadow seems almost non existent.
@@deanl58320:36 The shadow of the rear overhang of the vehicle is clearly being cast onto the ground towards the camera. The rest is hard to make out. Keep trying!
@@andrewjohnston6631 Start at 0.32 and slow it down and watch the difference in shadows between the blue building and the vehicle. Watch how the shadow forms and moves on the blue building, then compare it with the orange vehicle. Even compare it with the size/length of the shadows that the people walking around near the vehicle are casting. The rear cabin does cast a shadow later, but prior to that, there seems to be nothing. For mine, that orange vehicle is taller than the building so I would have thought its shadow would be quite visible and at least as long as the buildings shadow. Like I said though, it could just be perspective.
You can check weather yourself, that's ah, sort of what the video is about. I'm outa time, but you've obviously got plenty to leave useless comments like that.
@JohnArmagh-s5v You talking to me??? If you are, and you're referring to the timelapse videos. Options were, last 24 hours, 30 days, other choices a little irrelevant.
Idk what it is, but something doesn't look right about this sun. It doesn't look natural some how. Is it to white, to bright? Compared to other video, something doesn't just look right.
ROFL best debunk ever: _I don't know what it is but it doesn't look right._ Add it to "it looks flat to me" and there you have all the FE evidence ever presented. 😂
I have the "not right" that you're looking for: The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back). Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@primonomeultimonome Do a timelapse of the sun, that's exactly what happens. Every single photo is different. It doesn't take 50 photos for the rays and flares to gradually move.
@@josephmaxxwell Except that every single timelapse video taken with a tracking camera shows no flickering at all. Feel free to get an equatorial mount and try yourself, although you should have done that before spamming your nonsense everywhere.
Gotta lie to globe you mean. Where’s your declining water curvature? Maybe you could stop starring at the ceiling and calling other people liars until you have your house in order?
@@realsetanta70 - the 24-hour sun proves that your claims about a "lack of curvature" are irrelevant. If you can't fit a 24-hour sun into your model then your model must be wrong about the "lack of curvature" as well as your claims about "no gravity". There is nothing wrong with the globe model - there is no house to be in order because those who claim the Earth is flat - because that house has been flattened.
@JohnArmagh-s5v The flat earth has been "flattened" by a light in the sky? LOL!! You're going to be dissatisfied to learn that your loathed "flat Earthers" aren't going anywhere. You have just blasted off a litany of strawman positions that have nothing to do me. Why would you claim that I have a model or ever mentioned "gravity"? You're making the mistake of presuming based on the opinions of others, it's called "group think" and it isn't serving you well. "There is nothing wrong with the globe model" Sorry, there is, but you just haven't noticed the problem. There is a geometric obligation that comes with the specific radius value of 3,959 miles. That obligation should be measurable in the form of curvature decline relative to an established tangent point. This decline is not detectable in the environment and is a fiction required by your model. Nothing the sun does in the sky will change the fact that level is a singular plane as demonstrated by the surface of any large body of water. I don't claim to understand the workings of the heavens but I can measure and test the ground floor and the results don't suit your ideas. Glad Duffy and crew have provided you with a data point that matches your world view. Case closed for you? Great.
So the main idea of your smear campaign video is for somebody else to find anomolies because you can't and you need to be able to smear the work of the people who went down there, correct?
@@EdwinDekker71 - flat Earthers are wrong simply with proof the Earth cannot be flat - which is what the Final Experiment has done for all to see. If it ain't flat then it must be curved. Get it? Flat Earth is dead. You need to latch onto another conspiracy theory.
The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back). Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@josephmaxxwell Quite the opposite actually, given that the camera mount follows the path of the Sun. I have no idea why you guys need to make s**t up when you know nothing about some topic.
Folks, there was a marathon at Union Glacier recently. Theoretically, there were at least 40 other people there at the same time who could confirm or disprove anything suspicious. Who’s willing to track some of them down and talk to them?
Do you think they'll have the 24hr sun on there??? If not, why not??? Was the weather no good, and then the weather just magically cleared for sun god RA and TFE!!!
The sun looks like the sun in that edited video a few years ago, it's definitely not windy there, wherever they are.
Did you see what the map said about the wind? ~5kts. An almost imperceptible breeze.
Is the sun supposed to look different? Jesus Christ you guys can't even tell what reality is anymore.
They fool globers and children... and mock them perversely by reading bedtime stories to them...
Really sordid
Heathens. Once you see Flat you can't say scripture says ball.
"Nuh-uh"
At 3:11 camera starts to turn the other way from the sun. Can't trust anything. Cgi.
Nice catch!
I can confirm that.
@daizyflower272 What does that other camera have to do with anything? Can you tell me whose camera that was and what it was doing? You have no idea.
It is wild to me that your first reaction to seeing something not behave the way you think it should - based purely on assumptions you have made - is "CGI" and not "I wonder what that camera is doing, Maybe I could find out what is going on".
The mount which that camera was on ran out of battery.
Why does the camera tracking the Sun's movement all of a sudden stop following the Sun and tracks back at 0:47 seconds. Perhaps the Sun was no longer visible for it to track, despite the video showing the Sun high in the sky.
That was 25 hours after the start of the video. It already passed where it had started. The video stops when it is over a small peak. The video started before the sun had reached that peak the day before. This shows MORE than a full day of sun.
Another camera, more than likely started before the one we're looking through.
I see what you are saying now. That said, do you know whose camera it is and what they intended for it to do? What does some other camera have to do with the point of the time lapse that this camera took?
There were several people there with various different camera setups capturing various things. My recommendation would be to ask Dave McKeegan about that camera as he probably knows whose camera that was and what it was doing.
Just found out that what happend is that the equatorial mount that camera was on ran out of battery.
This is the video I was on about mate with the strange shadows
21seconds and 34seconds
34 seconds especially… with the antenna shadow on the hut vs the mini tripod bottom left before they remove the mini tripod the antenna shadow sure does whip round quickly compared to it
Weird cameras. If you look at each item on the pass, each ones shadow points at you from the light source, whatever that may be.
Also, why does the slr type camera on the tracking device suddenly dip down then it looks like it turned back to the right… I am pretty sure this was jeranism’s camera
Actually no, I am wrong it’s not his
@@antonyplatt1869
It started before, and finished before. Some thought the light shone down the side from a/the sun shining from the east, but it was the camera turning.
the web cam shows 14 hours,6 hours, 2 hours, 14h-6h-2h. missing 24 hours ago. There is a crucial time missing again. Why?
So according to you the sun made a complete 360-degree circuit in just 14 hours?
@JohnArmagh-s5v They are referring to the weather webcam that is brought up. Which, from what I can see, just shows mountains with the light coming from different directions at a few times of the day.
They had a marathon in "Antarctica" the other day.
I didn't see it.
@@nofanfare7426 you clown 🤡😂
no road to the Sun ever. I compared with my timelapses in snow, it is there. no sun reflection on a table, nowhere
0:29-0:31 The sun is reflecting off the tabletop. Get your eyes checked.
@andrewjohnston6631 nope, probably the light source is not that powerful and too local. Stay calm mate,
@@SergeiMaltsev The table appears brighter as the sun is seen above it. This is indisputable.
@andrewjohnston6631 that's the Sun with the clear sky, the table with its smooth surface should have exploded with brightness.
@@SergeiMaltsev Wow! Those goalposts moved quickly!
First you claimed that there was no reflection.
Now you say there’s not enough reflection.
#ContradictionAlert
It's impossible for this shot to be from Antarctica
z this shot must come from the northern beigun
that's the first thought that popped in my head. And it was most likely prerecorded too and sold to the public as a live event.
So it’s being played backwards?
Why is it impossible?
@@fepeerreview3150 The southernmost point of the sun is the Tropic of Capricorn and Antarctica is further away
the sun never reaches the coast, much less circumnavigates it
@@adix3000 So, another unsupported claim. I'm asking for evidence, not unsupported claims.
Where is the solar filter ? Why is it a glarey mess ? Where are the sun spots this guy supposedly knows photography
@@TheKuul69 It's all coming during the next days, get ready with your denial and excuses. 🤡
this isn’t taken on his solar filter camera, fairly certain everything else will be uploaded when he’s home
It is not a glarey mess. The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back). Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@josephmaxxwell No idea why you keep spamming the same nonsense on every comment thread.
The solar filter is on a different camera. There were about 10 cameras rolling.
Huh. Where are they then?
Who knows, they claim Antartica, but we haven't seen one penguin yet lol
@@tjpal8602 - the penguins tend to be near the coast - where they can catch fish. Antarctica is a desert - not much food inland.
The wind is just 6kt. A gentle breeze at best.
WIND?😂
@@nofanfare7426 - BREEZE.
@JohnArmagh-s5v
Clouds!!!!!
@@nofanfare7426 The sky is barely visible in the weather webcam.
To be clear, what I mean is that the webcam is mostly looking at the ground and a mountain, not pointed at the sky.
There's always something questionable isn't there? Lucky they had ideal conditions.
So many miracles for god sun ra.
@@nofanfare7426 Agree that it isn't conclusive on it's own, but my gut tells me it will lead to something that is. I'm sharing to all my channels and contacts
I wld have expected it to go a bit darker at some point... like twilight or something... but it just seemed to stay at a particular level of brightness. Also.. was expecting it a few days later at the solstice??
@@uncoolben79 Expecting what a few days later?
@@uncoolben79why would the brightness dim when the sun doesn't go near let alone reach the horizon?
Is keegan deceiving us?
No, you are doing it all by yourselves.
@@primonomeultimonome He is deceiving you monkey troll. Go back enjoying your kids CGI and let serious people in peace
53 years old pilot
is conclusive evidence😂
@@CyberFighter-hu7xo Go get an education instead of making a fool of yourself on the Internet.
When was the video recording? Looks that was cloudy at south pole in the last few days.
Could've been clear on their day, IDK. The timelapse only gives 6 days out of 30. It's just an idea for others to look at things to see what they can find. However the 6 days don't look good.
Psst: Those guys are 700 mi away from the pole. You might as well tell us you think it was cloudy in New York City because you checked the weather in Indiana.
Psst Off! Stellarium, Lat Lon for Unicorn Glacier!!!!!
@@nofanfare7426 Stellarium predictions match McKeegan's video perfectly. Whatever mismatch you've stitched together here is either because you don't know how to use the software or because you can't edit footage properly.
@@Peter-o9n6p
LOL!!! You're ODing on the copium that bad that you're commenting on the wrong video. OR! Watch my next video where Stellarium may just destroy it.
The shadows don't match!
@@rocketspushoffair Don't match what? You'd better wait at least noon before your first beer. 😂
@@primonomeultimonome 0:41 that tripod closest to you with the big camera is an overlay, notice the short legs don't even touch the groundshadows going in almost opposite direction in the same frame, and in another clip most of the tripods had no shadow! LoL! It doesn't take much to fool a globe fundy like you. Let alone the fact that we see south west sunsets as far south as you can go, tell us at what latitude do we look north for 24 hours to see a backwards moving sun? flatearthclassroom.blogspot.com/2019/01/antarctica.html You have nothing.
@@rocketspushoffairThe only thing I noticed is that you either need to get a pair of eyeglasses or to learn how to use TH-cam properly. On a second thought, you'd better stop drinking altogether. 😂
Something just doesn't seem right. Is it possible the sun does a figure 8 between the north and south poles? It remains to be unproven so far.
The place on Earth where the sun is directly overhead is called the subsolar point.
The subsolar point is on the equator in September. Then it spirals gradually southwards completing one circuit of the Earth each day, towards the Tropic of Capricorn - causing the 24-hour sun inside the Antarctic Circle. Then it gradually spirals back towards the equator which it crosses in March. It continues spiralling northwards towards the Tropic of Cancer in June, causing the 24-hour sun inside the Arctic Circle. Then it starts to spiral back towards the equator for the next September.
The sun is never overhead north of the Tropic of Cancer, nor south of the Tropic of Capricorn.
@JohnArmagh-s5v
Yeah that can still work on a FE.
Thought that when I first saw the analema. I couldn't see how it could be seen from, say, out from South America, Australia and South Africa (On an AE Projection). Flat Works did a vid on a Zetetic Map, I didn't get to watch it all, to biz.
@@nofanfare7426
Yeah from Florida the sun is setting way to the south. I'm pretty sure the figure 8 sun can work on FE.
@@wideawake2814 - unfortunately we have measured the ground speed of the subsolar point - it is at its slowest over the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn - about 952mph - and fastest along the equator - about 1038mph.
And that most definitely does not work on a flat Earth.
orange oversnow vehicle that comes into sight around 0.32, if any of you can zoom in with high definition and check out its shadow. Looks a lot different to the one cast by the blue shed just in front of it, but it may just be perspective and distance??
There's that and ground angles to. It's not really a reliable method IMO.
The caterpillar tracks are probably wider than the body of the vehicle, so the body’s shadow will mostly fall on them.
@@andrewjohnston6631 Tracks on oversnow vehicles l have seen don't stick out that much wider than the body. If so its only about a tyre width, when you compare its shadow to the blue building, the buildings shadow is substantially more obvious due to the depth of it. ANd when you look how long the shadows cast by the camera tripods are, this vehicle shadow seems almost non existent.
@@deanl58320:36 The shadow of the rear overhang of the vehicle is clearly being cast onto the ground towards the camera. The rest is hard to make out.
Keep trying!
@@andrewjohnston6631 Start at 0.32 and slow it down and watch the difference in shadows between the blue building and the vehicle. Watch how the shadow forms and moves on the blue building, then compare it with the orange vehicle. Even compare it with the size/length of the shadows that the people walking around near the vehicle are casting. The rear cabin does cast a shadow later, but prior to that, there seems to be nothing. For mine, that orange vehicle is taller than the building so I would have thought its shadow would be quite visible and at least as long as the buildings shadow. Like I said though, it could just be perspective.
Cloudy skies lol 🤔 I knew it! They got caught lying!
What's empty?
@@nofanfare7426The camera footage but nevermind. I see they got caught lying about bright blue skies though. Thanks brother.
@@MuchFruit
Maybe not, it's only a few days. I'm hoping someone else will check stuff like this. I'm out of time!!!!!
@@nofanfare7426Will look into it.
@@nofanfare7426near the end some of the tripods aren't casting a shadow also the end of the small mountain range should have shown a little shadow
Welll, well, well...
Should have called solomans adventure 😮
Wow, check that sun burning off those clouds at 0.02 to 0.07. Got some power.
Pretty selective for a huge sun 93,000,000 miles away.
@@nofanfare7426 yep thats one amazing fireball🤣
@@deanl5832Burning off what? 😂😂😂
@@primonomeultimonome as in the clouds themselves.....watch what happens to the clouds.
@@deanl5832 Yes and...? Are you aware that clouds are just water droplets? 🤣
Right when the sun was dropping he stopped recording? Wow bro smh thx for the tease
You can check weather yourself, that's ah, sort of what the video is about. I'm outa time, but you've obviously got plenty to leave useless comments like that.
Are you stupid? That was around 25 hours. The sun was already past the starting point when he ended it.
He recorded for a complete 24 hours. Are you claiming a day is longer than 24 hours?
@JohnArmagh-s5v
You talking to me???
If you are, and you're referring to the timelapse videos. Options were, last 24 hours, 30 days, other choices a little irrelevant.
Idk what it is, but something doesn't look right about this sun. It doesn't look natural some how. Is it to white, to bright? Compared to other video, something doesn't just look right.
ROFL best debunk ever: _I don't know what it is but it doesn't look right._ Add it to "it looks flat to me" and there you have all the FE evidence ever presented. 😂
I have the "not right" that you're looking for:
The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back).
Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@josephmaxxwell No, it would definitely not, otherwise any video of the Sun would be impossible to watch for the constant flickering.
@@primonomeultimonome Do a timelapse of the sun, that's exactly what happens. Every single photo is different. It doesn't take 50 photos for the rays and flares to gradually move.
@@josephmaxxwell Except that every single timelapse video taken with a tracking camera shows no flickering at all. Feel free to get an equatorial mount and try yourself, although you should have done that before spamming your nonsense everywhere.
Gotta lie to flerf
Gotta lie to globe you mean. Where’s your declining water curvature? Maybe you could stop starring at the ceiling and calling other people liars until you have your house in order?
@realsetanta70 doubling down on the lies I see.
@@3ron Oh you must have evidence of curvature decline for me to investigate?
@@realsetanta70 - the 24-hour sun proves that your claims about a "lack of curvature" are irrelevant. If you can't fit a 24-hour sun into your model then your model must be wrong about the "lack of curvature" as well as your claims about "no gravity".
There is nothing wrong with the globe model - there is no house to be in order because those who claim the Earth is flat - because that house has been flattened.
@JohnArmagh-s5v The flat earth has been "flattened" by a light in the sky? LOL!! You're going to be dissatisfied to learn that your loathed "flat Earthers" aren't going anywhere.
You have just blasted off a litany of strawman positions that have nothing to do me. Why would you claim that I have a model or ever mentioned "gravity"? You're making the mistake of presuming based on the opinions of others, it's called "group think" and it isn't serving you well.
"There is nothing wrong with the globe model"
Sorry, there is, but you just haven't noticed the problem. There is a geometric obligation that comes with the specific radius value of 3,959 miles. That obligation should be measurable in the form of curvature decline relative to an established tangent point. This decline is not detectable in the environment and is a fiction required by your model.
Nothing the sun does in the sky will change the fact that level is a singular plane as demonstrated by the surface of any large body of water.
I don't claim to understand the workings of the heavens but I can measure and test the ground floor and the results don't suit your ideas. Glad Duffy and crew have provided you with a data point that matches your world view. Case closed for you? Great.
Yeah the other camera stop following the sun at one stage , why ? Smells fishy.
I havent seen a sky that clear in years
Antarctica or my clip?
🥴💯
👍
So the main idea of your smear campaign video is for somebody else to find anomolies because you can't and you need to be able to smear the work of the people who went down there, correct?
Incorrect!!!
flat earth is dead
🐏🐏🐏🐏back in the pen Mo
ron. 🤣
Where is the 24 hr live feed? Oops. Fail!
Ehm there is (still) no curvature...
@@EdwinDekker71 - flat Earthers are wrong simply with proof the Earth cannot be flat - which is what the Final Experiment has done for all to see. If it ain't flat then it must be curved. Get it? Flat Earth is dead. You need to latch onto another conspiracy theory.
@@MuchFruit And what would that change exactly? Are you saying you don't trust your papa flerfs down there? ROFL
The sun's rays and lens flares stay the same from photo to photo. You can see this by going frame-by-frame (period for forward, comma for back).
Therefore that light in the sky was edited into the timelapse afterward. This cannot be an actual timelapse of the actual sun. Every photo would have differing rays and flares.
@@josephmaxxwell Quite the opposite actually, given that the camera mount follows the path of the Sun. I have no idea why you guys need to make s**t up when you know nothing about some topic.