i watched this entire series . i watched this entire series and it helped me tremendously. it is a great service to students. you are the perfect teacher for nervous students specially. something very very non judgemental about u. thanks
The whole series is incredible dude. The explanations are understandable, you give examples, coherent, the digital writing plays a big part on the previous things mentioned. The audio sucks sometimes but this is ignorable: it only sucks for one or two seconds (five at the most maybe) when it happens. It is a 9.98/10 series.
I'm glad the audio wasn't too big of a problem and it's great to hear that you enjoyed this series. Thanks for taking the time to comment with your questions and feedback and I hope you find my other videos helpful as well!
This is a fabulous video--thank you! One quick comment, though--your captions are accurate, but if I click on the English transcript I get the transcript for a totally different video. Thought you'd want to know :)
Hi Rachelle, you're welcome and thanks for letting me know! If you're referring to the built-in YT transcript box (click the ... under the video) it may be showing the auto-generated captions not the corrected ones but you can switch this by clicking the arrow at the bottom. For me this box shows the correct transcript for this video so it could just be a random TH-cam error that refreshing the page might correct. If you're referring to the transcript page here: www.psychexamreview.com/ethical-guidelines-for-psychological-research/ it seems the embedded TH-cam subscribe button was causing some problems with the text that followed it but I think I've fixed that now.
This video help me understand the APA Ethical Guidelines. I was able to take my own notes. Im currently taking PSY/245 and a question that was asked was. Why have these guidelines proved to be controversial when conducting research? Honestly I dont see them as controversial. You mind giving me some input on this?
A lot of controversy in research ethics usually focuses on animal studies and the risk of harm or death that lab animals may face. When it comes to more mundane human studies, there is disagreement and debate on how some of the guidelines may slow research and create unnecessary barriers to collecting data quickly or from larger samples. The process of getting IRB approval for studies like questionnaires, assessments, or self-reports still takes time and researchers may sometimes feel that their time is wasted completing forms and ethics reviews for studies that pose virtually no real risk to subjects. Other areas for consideration would be debating the amount of deception that's acceptable, whether completing an informed consent form increases the artificiality of the lab setting vs. real life, or whether larger risks should be acceptable if subjects are willing to consent to them. Hope this provides a few starting points to think about!
PsychExamReview sorry for all the questions. These videos got me coming out with all types of questions. So for the next five weeks I will be asking questions. If that’s ok. What would you say is the primary goal for all psychological research?
Hi, could i just ask, If a researcher is concerned about whether an experimental group will be susceptible to more risks when participating in a study than a control group, which ethical principle is the researcher concerned with? Is it the principle of beneficence or that of Justice?
@@PsychExamReview Thank you so much, I am however a little confused as to why this doesn't fall under the principle of Justice (with regards to the distribution of risks and benefits)
@@aaronkoh4567 I can see it being debatable depending on who makes up the groups or what the manipulation is. My view of the APA guidelines is that justice pertains to who takes part in studies and access to information and resources but I'm not a researcher or an expert in this area and so this may not be the correct interpretation.
Unfortunately I don't have a way to fix this, I may eventually re-record some of these earlier topics that have poor audio quality. Thanks for commenting!
I'm not sure which codes you are referring to but you can find full details of the American Psychological Association's ethical code here if it helps: www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
![Ethical implications - Issues and debates [A-Level Psychology]](/img/n.gif)
i watched this entire series . i watched this entire series and it helped me tremendously. it is a great service to students. you are the perfect teacher for nervous students specially. something very very non judgemental about u. thanks
The whole series is incredible dude. The explanations are understandable, you give examples, coherent, the digital writing plays a big part on the previous things mentioned. The audio sucks sometimes but this is ignorable: it only sucks for one or two seconds (five at the most maybe) when it happens. It is a 9.98/10 series.
I'm glad the audio wasn't too big of a problem and it's great to hear that you enjoyed this series. Thanks for taking the time to comment with your questions and feedback and I hope you find my other videos helpful as well!
I'm taking psychology for my degree ..this is really helpful for my assignment thank you so muchhhhh🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈🎈
You're welcome!
This is a fabulous video--thank you! One quick comment, though--your captions are accurate, but if I click on the English transcript I get the transcript for a totally different video. Thought you'd want to know :)
Hi Rachelle, you're welcome and thanks for letting me know!
If you're referring to the built-in YT transcript box (click the ... under the video) it may be showing the auto-generated captions not the corrected ones but you can switch this by clicking the arrow at the bottom. For me this box shows the correct transcript for this video so it could just be a random TH-cam error that refreshing the page might correct.
If you're referring to the transcript page here: www.psychexamreview.com/ethical-guidelines-for-psychological-research/ it seems the embedded TH-cam subscribe button was causing some problems with the text that followed it but I think I've fixed that now.
thank you so much!! this was a lot of help especially cause I've got my psych exam tmr
I'm glad you've found it helpful, best of luck on your exam!
@@PsychExamReview what are names of 24 countries who presented ethical codes
Why are people coerced into participating in tutorials at university otherwise they fail?
This video help me understand the APA Ethical Guidelines. I was able to take my own notes. Im currently taking PSY/245 and a question that was asked was. Why have these guidelines proved to be controversial when conducting research? Honestly I dont see them as controversial. You mind giving me some input on this?
A lot of controversy in research ethics usually focuses on animal studies and the risk of harm or death that lab animals may face.
When it comes to more mundane human studies, there is disagreement and debate on how some of the guidelines may slow research and create unnecessary barriers to collecting data quickly or from larger samples. The process of getting IRB approval for studies like questionnaires, assessments, or self-reports still takes time and researchers may sometimes feel that their time is wasted completing forms and ethics reviews for studies that pose virtually no real risk to subjects.
Other areas for consideration would be debating the amount of deception that's acceptable, whether completing an informed consent form increases the artificiality of the lab setting vs. real life, or whether larger risks should be acceptable if subjects are willing to consent to them. Hope this provides a few starting points to think about!
PsychExamReview sorry for all the questions. These videos got me coming out with all types of questions. So for the next five weeks I will be asking questions. If that’s ok. What would you say is the primary goal for all psychological research?
Sir help me out :// Still don't get the difference between agoraphobia and social phobia
Hi, could i just ask, If a researcher is concerned about whether an experimental group will be susceptible to more risks when participating in a study than a control group, which ethical principle is the researcher concerned with?
Is it the principle of beneficence or that of Justice?
I think this would fall under beneficence since it is related to the risk/benefit analysis for the manipulation being used.
@@PsychExamReview
Thank you so much,
I am however a little confused as to why this doesn't fall under the principle of Justice (with regards to the distribution of risks and benefits)
@@aaronkoh4567 I can see it being debatable depending on who makes up the groups or what the manipulation is. My view of the APA guidelines is that justice pertains to who takes part in studies and access to information and resources but I'm not a researcher or an expert in this area and so this may not be the correct interpretation.
Excellent video but the sound is too low at many points.
Unfortunately I don't have a way to fix this, I may eventually re-record some of these earlier topics that have poor audio quality. Thanks for commenting!
Thank you so much for this info. It helps me a lot. By the way, you're so handsome ❤
Thanks, I'm really glad to hear that it's helpful!
Thank you so much sir.......
No problem!
Great playlist except that sound is inconsistent
Thanks, the sound is much better in later videos, sorry these early ones are a bit rough!
Which are the eight common ethical codes plz any one who gave me answer
I'm not sure which codes you are referring to but you can find full details of the American Psychological Association's ethical code here if it helps: www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
very handsome man,,,, very handsome information.
volume keeps goin gup and down
Yeah, this was an issue, later videos in this series used better equipment to help reduce this.
so boring