Wow, this video really blew up huh! thanks for watching! but I cannot promise a frequent upload of compositions, as for now I am not composing seriously, so no need to subscribe, unless if you're looking for score videos! here are some frequently asked questions: Q. why is it in B minor? A. the virtual instrument is a Graf 1826 fortepiano with the historic pitch A=415 Hz, a half-step lower than the usual 440Hz, so it's natural that you'd hear B minor but I understand your confusion because not a lot of people would expect Historic pitch on a late-romantic style etude. Q. the triplets are not pianistic or viable ( the ones that first appear in bar 5.) A. I agree, those might have been a stretch, though playable non-legato, or rather with a staccato on the second and the third notes, it's quite ugly, and non-pianistic. the first notes could be omitted I acknowledge all comments about the lack of development and form, length, or how it may be seen as a collage connecting simple schemas, it is interesting that youtube has come to recommend to many thousands of people this banter-ish work when excellent composers upload excellent pieces, getting little views.
This sounds crazy, but as a mediocre pianist, you might be able to keep some (if not all) of the "non-viable" triplet material like in b5 with a bit of... trickery. Some ambidexterity. You could look at trying to share one of the triplet dyads with the LH, forcing leaps in the LH, which, while hard, might not be *as* "unviable". Or, even better! Play just the bottom of note of either the 2nd or 3rd dyad in each triplet with the LH instead. This will require reworking the score, though to make that obvious for the performer :) Either way, I think some sort of compromise can be found in using leaps in the left hand.
Nice, man! I loved the key modulation in the middle. It sounds like a Chopin etude. I would recommend exploring the ternary form, bc it would go great with this type of etude. My favorite part of Chopin etudes and nocturnes (which are almost all in ternary form btw) is when it returns to the principal theme after finishing the B theme, which would really fit with this type of composition.
it’s still a beautiful piece but chopin would’ve written it a lot differently. the left hand is „too dry“. chopin adds more color by using waves. i think that also the melody would be more sung and connected with in if chopin wrote it. all this said doesn’t mean the piece written isn’t good. the piece is wonderful i love it. but chopin would’ve done it just not in that way
the virtual instrument is a Graf 1826 fortepiano with the historic pitch A=415 Hz, a half-step lower than the usual 440Hz, so it's natural that you'd hear B minor but I understand your confusion because not a lot of people would expect Historic pitch on a late-romantic style etude.
Really cool piece; I especially loved the rhythmic contrast between the two hands in measure 11. 16-based time signatures are fun & I seriously don't understand why more ppl don't compose in 12-16 like you did since 12 feels great with 3- & 4-based pulses.
This is really good, this is prodigy work right here! Please give us more pieces like this, its amazing. Do you plan to share your sheet music so we can play this ourselves as well?
I haven’t listened to this all the way but I’m confused about one thing. The music is written in C minor, by the audio is in B minor. How? Other than that I like it :)
It sounds like Bach just because of the use of the Circle of Fifths. I mean, that was used by other composers also, but I guess it sounds like the Baroque style of the Circle of Fifths, if you know what I mean.
This is very nice! Really like the changes in key and the power it gets from those descending octaves! I hear you use a Graf 1826 as a virtual instrument... Could you please tell where you managed to get that? (Thanks in advance!)
So many say: because of their perfect pitch. If we look close on notes, you see a frequency number, and if we go up to a]frequence like 10 and 20 thousand, I don’t think you will know the note by hearing it
Playing this at 0.75 speed is also really nice. Maybe it's because I play Organ which is almost impossible to play Etudes this fast (unless its a full electric organ with 0 key resistance ofc). Really like this one though, eager for more!
Nice etude, it sounds really good. Only problem I see is the playability of the triplets, they could get tricky to play at this tempo. I have no doubt someone out there can play it, given enough training and patience, but maybe it’s unnecessarily difficult for the pianist.
historical pitch A=415hz instead of 440hz, would sound a half step down. listen to any historically informed performance of a Bach cantata ( present also in my channel ) you would find that what you hear rarely coincides with what's written.
Видимо, тот мужик, который исполняет, сам сочинил этот этюд. Выше в комментах какой-то товарищ на английском языке хвалит этот этюд и пишет, что похоже на Шопена, особенно модуляция в другую тональность в середине этюда. Я бы сказала, что для Шопена нотный текст слишком прямолинейный. Похоже на этюды Карла Черни по бетховенским интонациям. Известно, что Черни записывал за Бетховеном его импровизации, а после смерти гения издавал их под своим именем.
Good job, I like the idea! I would suggest you to sketch back the piece in plain four-part harmony (or even just a figured bass if you know how to do that) because the music makes sense "vertically" but there are some problems "horizontally" like parallels and awkward melodies/voice leading that can be more easily detected that way. Then you can easily switch it back to this pianistic style. Also sometimes the bass melody sounds a bit redundant. You could for example have an occasional 16th note there and I'd suggest to avoid using V-I too frequently.
I see the parallels definitely on the 1-7-6-5, and on m11. I usually put a lot of care on counterpoint but I got lazy this time heh. too much fifth progressions too. thanks for the feedback.
it is unfortunately a little overpriced, (around 200$ for the software) but its one of the free instruments that come together with a bunch of other historical instruments for pianoteq
there's a couple options, but I am afraid none are free, I am fortunate to have recieved some fortepiano sf2 files for free, if you could get your hands on those it would be good as this one. I'd recommend not spending 200 dollars for a fortepiano VST like Pianoteq8, which is what you here in the video
Question: why don’t composers write their pieces with triplets like moonlight sonata? I find it much easier putting 6:8 into 2:4 with triplets because you’re able to count it easier. 6:8 implies that you can count the notes precisely which I find quite odd
Well written. Nice to know there are people still writing real music. The last measure was a little cheeky but I'm certain the whole thing would sound better with a human performance.
@@nift36 What? Me giving my honest feedback? Perhaps you didn't like my wording? I can say it this way instead: "I really enjoyed this! It's cool that there are people still making this kind of music. I did think the last bit was a little weird though. I'm sure it'd sound great if I heard someone play it live."
@@FlamingZelda3 the problem is just your implication that music in the style of a 19th century pianist-composer a la chopin is "real music" as opposed to other styles. -- its a narrow viewpoint that limits your ability to enjoy the wide range of musical idioms we can enjoy today.
The music is well but you do not think of poor pianists who will play it (if they will). For example, episodes from 0:09-0:13 (with three sextes) and 0:43-0:48 are extremely difficult and not convenient for the right hand (I would say they contradict the nature of pianistic hands). You know, a lot of good composers revised their pieces after consultations with pianists or violinists, because it happens often that a composer doesn't understand well the structure of an instrument. Have a good luck!
I am aware of this, it is tough playable of course non-legato, I am practicing this part, but I've considered revision when it comes to the triplets. I have written this composition on the keyboard. Thanks for watching tough!
@@yuk_notkim7658 No, it's just because composers are often not good pianists, so they need good and rational advice. Do you know who Brahms wrote his concerto for violin? Read and check then.
@@yuk_notkim7658And by the way, what is the aim then if everyone will just praise? There is always need of reasonable critics. The autor has his right to agree or not.
historical pitch A=415hz instead of 440hz, would sound a half step down. listen to any historically informed performance of a Bach cantata ( present also in my channel ) you would find that what you hear rarely coincides with what's written.
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.76[1/2] โจโฉเปิดป่าโหดรับโอ๊ต-ป๊อบ รอบนี้พี่เอาจริง!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pNg5O7Pf-a0/mqdefault.jpg)
![บุกร้านไอศกรีม VJ วุ้นเส้น !!!! [ดูคลิปเต็มหน้าช่อง] #Short | PANG ORNHIRA](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g549nEhKZdc/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow, this video really blew up huh! thanks for watching! but I cannot promise a frequent upload of compositions, as for now I am not composing seriously, so no need to subscribe, unless if you're looking for score videos!
here are some frequently asked questions:
Q. why is it in B minor?
A. the virtual instrument is a Graf 1826 fortepiano with the historic pitch A=415 Hz, a half-step lower than the usual 440Hz, so it's natural that you'd hear B minor but I understand your confusion because not a lot of people would expect Historic pitch on a late-romantic style etude.
Q. the triplets are not pianistic or viable ( the ones that first appear in bar 5.)
A. I agree, those might have been a stretch, though playable non-legato, or rather with a staccato on the second and the third notes, it's quite ugly, and non-pianistic. the first notes could be omitted
I acknowledge all comments about the lack of development and form, length, or how it may be seen as a collage connecting simple schemas, it is interesting that youtube has come to recommend to many thousands of people this banter-ish work when excellent composers upload excellent pieces, getting little views.
This sounds crazy, but as a mediocre pianist, you might be able to keep some (if not all) of the "non-viable" triplet material like in b5 with a bit of... trickery. Some ambidexterity. You could look at trying to share one of the triplet dyads with the LH, forcing leaps in the LH, which, while hard, might not be *as* "unviable". Or, even better! Play just the bottom of note of either the 2nd or 3rd dyad in each triplet with the LH instead. This will require reworking the score, though to make that obvious for the performer :) Either way, I think some sort of compromise can be found in using leaps in the left hand.
What do you use to create these scores?
@@pablogilmoreno4913 musescore 4 actually
What is the actual name of the song and composer
@@nathansmusicspot3205 I composed this and the piece does not have a title other than "etude", but I like to refer it as "sixths"
Something about this makes me feel this will be one of those randomly recommended videos that has millions of views in a year or two
Never.. sadly
It's a romantic composition, nobody care
my thumb and pinky fingers hurt from watching this
Nice, man! I loved the key modulation in the middle. It sounds like a Chopin etude. I would recommend exploring the ternary form, bc it would go great with this type of etude. My favorite part of Chopin etudes and nocturnes (which are almost all in ternary form btw) is when it returns to the principal theme after finishing the B theme, which would really fit with this type of composition.
I get a heavy Alkan/Henselt vibe from this piece
thanks for checking it out! will do that.
Right but Chopin would’ve written this with triplets lol
it’s still a beautiful piece but chopin would’ve written it a lot differently. the left hand is „too dry“. chopin adds more color by using waves. i think that also the melody would be more sung and connected with in if chopin wrote it. all this said doesn’t mean the piece written isn’t good. the piece is wonderful i love it. but chopin would’ve done it just not in that way
It's like Crenzy not like Chopin. But piece is real classical
Just bumped into your channel and you compose great music! Please upload more of these if you would like to.
I love your Etude, I have a soft spot for perpetuum mobile style compositions and yours is really captivating!
Amazing piece!
As someone who has perfect pitch, this hurts my brain. The score says C minor but I hear B minor.
the virtual instrument is a Graf 1826 fortepiano with the historic pitch A=415 Hz, a half-step lower than the usual 440Hz, so it's natural that you'd hear B minor but I understand your confusion because not a lot of people would expect Historic pitch on a late-romantic style etude.
🙄
I also have perfect pitch
Hope it still hurts
I was gonna come and say this. I do not mind though.
Really cool piece; I especially loved the rhythmic contrast between the two hands in measure 11. 16-based time signatures are fun & I seriously don't understand why more ppl don't compose in 12-16 like you did since 12 feels great with 3- & 4-based pulses.
Amazing! Little advice from composet to composer - write also dynamics and articulation. It would be helpful for players
Really well written! Good job
Fantastic study 🎹🎶
Sounds like a mix between a Chopin etude and Touhou music to me, that's great
Sounds really good
I think its wonderful!! I really really like the 12|16 rythm!!
Very nice!!! Thank you! ❤️
Mesmerizing!
Sounds like Czerny wanted to punish a student with this
THIS IS AMAZING WHAT
Bruh that was awesome really enjoyed
Realy amazing etude
Descending basslines are just so dope, wish the C minor section got a repeat tho.
sequences, I love that
well written! would love to hear a human performance
this is SICK
congrats!!
this goes hard
I turn this shi on at every party
This is really good, this is prodigy work right here! Please give us more pieces like this, its amazing. Do you plan to share your sheet music so we can play this ourselves as well?
Magnifique!
That's very cool and intence! I like it!
I haven’t listened to this all the way but I’m confused about one thing. The music is written in C minor, by the audio is in B minor. How?
Other than that I like it :)
A4=415 in this piece
@@nift36 ok thanks so much
So bach style nice bro
It sounds like Bach just because of the use of the Circle of Fifths. I mean, that was used by other composers also, but I guess it sounds like the Baroque style of the Circle of Fifths, if you know what I mean.
This sounds amazing but also amazingly painful on the fingers :O
Im 100th subscriber!! My honer.
It certainly reminds me of the beginning of Bach's Prelude and Fugue No. 21
I think that avoiding all of those parallel 8ves between bottom & top, which impoverish this otherwise nice etude, would have been a good idea.
This is very nice! Really like the changes in key and the power it gets from those descending octaves!
I hear you use a Graf 1826 as a virtual instrument... Could you please tell where you managed to get that? (Thanks in advance!)
Nice piece! Reminds me of Scarlatti a little, or Soler.
So many say: because of their perfect pitch. If we look close on notes, you see a frequency number, and if we go up to a]frequence like 10 and 20 thousand, I don’t think you will know the note by hearing it
very good
That's a nice Etiude, congrat
Das ist perfekt
wow really nice, did you compose this?
This is a great piece! Will it be ok if you link a copy of the score in the key of b minor? Because this is a fun piece to play!
Playing this at 0.75 speed is also really nice. Maybe it's because I play Organ which is almost impossible to play Etudes this fast (unless its a full electric organ with 0 key resistance ofc).
Really like this one though, eager for more!
Was this in A=415, or are my ears failing me?
Nice piece! My hands hurt just looking at it, but it sounds good!
You are correct!
I love this etude so much! It's cool) Is it possible to get the sheet music?
Nice etude, it sounds really good. Only problem I see is the playability of the triplets, they could get tricky to play at this tempo. I have no doubt someone out there can play it, given enough training and patience, but maybe it’s unnecessarily difficult for the pianist.
Sheet music please! Are there other etudes on this technique?
태교에 많이도움되요❤
If this is played at 1.75 times speed it sounds somewhat Dohnányi esque
Can I send you a compositon that i've made? as it's obvious you compose good
Czrerny be like XD, GJ^^
Do you have sheet music available for purchase?!
Sheetnotes anywhere to download?
Let’s give him a hand for composing this piece in two diffrent keys
historical pitch A=415hz instead of 440hz, would sound a half step down. listen to any historically informed performance of a Bach cantata ( present also in my channel ) you would find that what you hear rarely coincides with what's written.
@@handavid6421 I think he’s referring to around 0:48, where there is a key change
@@bicillenium4019 Oh yeah I guess I might be wrong... got tired of all the people asking "B minor?" so every comment now looks like that now for me
why is it a half step flat? this is a piano so idk why it would be like that
Хотелось бы где-то вдохнуть и выдохнуть! Галоп! 🤩
Why Is It trasported?
wow, i can hear paganini
Nice etude but isn't this B minor? Are you using a baroque piano synthesizer?
Yeah!
이거 혹시 직접 작곡하신 건가요? 너무 좋아요
와 한국인이다
Bravo 🎉🎉🎉
Кто автор этого замечательного Этюда? Я хочу её сыграть!💛✍📖🎵 Подскажите имя автора, пожалуйста.
Видимо, тот мужик, который исполняет, сам сочинил этот этюд.
Выше в комментах какой-то товарищ на английском языке
хвалит этот этюд и пишет, что похоже на Шопена,
особенно модуляция в другую тональность в середине этюда.
Я бы сказала, что для Шопена нотный текст слишком прямолинейный.
Похоже на этюды Карла Черни по бетховенским интонациям.
Известно, что Черни записывал за Бетховеном его импровизации,
а после смерти гения издавал их под своим именем.
who is the composer?
Sounds Like Czerny Op.365 etude 58
Why is the playback in B minor?
Historical pitch!
Harmonically, I quite like the piece. Reminds me of Alkan, Henselt, Czerny, and Cramer.
Good job, I like the idea! I would suggest you to sketch back the piece in plain four-part harmony (or even just a figured bass if you know how to do that) because the music makes sense "vertically" but there are some problems "horizontally" like parallels and awkward melodies/voice leading that can be more easily detected that way. Then you can easily switch it back to this pianistic style. Also sometimes the bass melody sounds a bit redundant. You could for example have an occasional 16th note there and I'd suggest to avoid using V-I too frequently.
I see the parallels definitely on the 1-7-6-5, and on m11. I usually put a lot of care on counterpoint but I got lazy this time heh. too much fifth progressions too. thanks for the feedback.
I feel the ending was a bit rushed. Cook that tension a bit more, in my opinion. But yes, it sounds great and looks useful for technique.
😮
Are you a composer?
Damn, where can I get the virtual instrument?
it is unfortunately a little overpriced, (around 200$ for the software) but its one of the free instruments that come together with a bunch of other historical instruments for pianoteq
how can i get sound like this pianoforte?
there's a couple options, but I am afraid none are free, I am fortunate to have recieved some fortepiano sf2 files for free, if you could get your hands on those it would be good as this one. I'd recommend not spending 200 dollars for a fortepiano VST like Pianoteq8, which is what you here in the video
wHy B mINoR (I know lol, Baroque pitch)
Bravo!
Yeah well I can play Mary Has a Little Lamb
Smth like moszkowski+czerny with modulations in style of Myaskovsky/Prokofiev
Who wrote this etude? Who is the composer?
Question: why don’t composers write their pieces with triplets like moonlight sonata? I find it much easier putting 6:8 into 2:4 with triplets because you’re able to count it easier. 6:8 implies that you can count the notes precisely which I find quite odd
It’s pretty easy to count 6:8… just treat dotted quarter notes as the main pulse (or dotted eighths for 12:16, as shown here)
Cminor?
Nice piece. Needs a human performance and some dynamic variation, though. Also, it sounds like the pitch is old school. Great!!.....😆
As a perfect pitcher i heard its Bminor
Don't you know Baroque tuning?
@@yuk_notkim7658 I don't
@drebbiesimsdesign3535 Not surprised. I don't think you listen to Baroque music that's played in harpsichord.
@@drebbiesimsdesign3535 Not trying to be mean, by the way.
@@yuk_notkim7658 ohh i see
It is played by computer true?
Han! Heilà!
why is this in B minor?
Baroque tuning
Wonderful! For a moment, I thought it was Chopin!
Why b minor?
Historical pitch
Скинешь мне ноты?
Is it just me or what but my ears hear B minor......
It's Baroque tuning, that's why.
Well written. Nice to know there are people still writing real music. The last measure was a little cheeky but I'm certain the whole thing would sound better with a human performance.
please shut up all music is real music
this very attitude is why very nearly nobody likes classical music anymore
@@nift36 What? Me giving my honest feedback? Perhaps you didn't like my wording?
I can say it this way instead: "I really enjoyed this! It's cool that there are people still making this kind of music. I did think the last bit was a little weird though. I'm sure it'd sound great if I heard someone play it live."
"nice to know people are writing rEaL mUsIc"
@@FlamingZelda3 the problem is just your implication that music in the style of a 19th century pianist-composer a la chopin is "real music" as opposed to other styles. -- its a narrow viewpoint that limits your ability to enjoy the wide range of musical idioms we can enjoy today.
sounds like b minor. other than that it sounds amazing
That chord sounds like B minor, not C minor
You sure don't know Baroque tuning.
The music is well but you do not think of poor pianists who will play it (if they will). For example, episodes from 0:09-0:13 (with three sextes) and 0:43-0:48 are extremely difficult and not convenient for the right hand (I would say they contradict the nature of pianistic hands). You know, a lot of good composers revised their pieces after consultations with pianists or violinists, because it happens often that a composer doesn't understand well the structure of an instrument. Have a good luck!
I am aware of this, it is tough playable of course non-legato, I am practicing this part, but I've considered revision when it comes to the triplets. I have written this composition on the keyboard. Thanks for watching tough!
Those bars are difficult, but playable. No worse than what famous composers have done!
You're only criticizing that just because this person isn't Beethoven, Chopin, Liszt, or any other famous composers that were virtuosic.
@@yuk_notkim7658 No, it's just because composers are often not good pianists, so they need good and rational advice. Do you know who Brahms wrote his concerto for violin? Read and check then.
@@yuk_notkim7658And by the way, what is the aim then if everyone will just praise? There is always need of reasonable critics. The autor has his right to agree or not.
Its like hail hurting my head . No soul in it ...
I respect your opinion, after all it is a etude, but yes, there is truth to what you say.
Bruh wth why is it in a different key? My perfect pitch is crying lol
historical pitch A=415hz instead of 440hz, would sound a half step down. listen to any historically informed performance of a Bach cantata ( present also in my channel ) you would find that what you hear rarely coincides with what's written.
Wow, there's so many people that don't understand Baroque tuning.
Some chinese virtuoso will play it much faster, brace yourselves 😊
predictable and like VIVAldi: MR SEQUENCE"....MORE CRAP
Same profile pic?
Yes!
Thanks for commenting, you are everywhere
@@handavid6421 True, I comment on every music video I find haha.
@@Ivan_1791Basically the same for me.
@@yuk_notkim7658 I recommend you getting a profile pic so people recognize you.
Decent, though I think you would have been better making it more complex, especially the B section.
I agree...
just felt like finishing it there, but definitely more could have been done