I think many Christians are too busy playing x box and hanging out with friends to read their Bible. On the same note, there are many who are becoming on fire for God. 🙏✝️
@razark9 strange that you would bother with videos from answers in Genesis if your only purpose is to troll people. If you truly prescribe to a materialistic, evolutionary mindset, why bother arguing the point? If everything is random, your thought process is no more ordered than anything else and is simply the result of chance. I pray that God would use these videos to save you as you watch them to indulge your sinful desire to insult people.
@razark9 I'm not sure why, but I don't see this comment directly, so I may not see future replies either. That being the case, I'll try not to ask questions that demand an answer. I bring up the evolutionary mindset because that is the general cause of this debate. Neither the big bang nor evolution over millions of years have been proven. They are theories. Science is the systematic study of repeatable, observable phenomena. We cannot study the origin of the universe fromm a purely scientific standpoint. All we can do is look at what we understand and extrapolate it backwards, which is likely to lead to some misunderstandings regardless. However, you can't do any of this without making some assumptions. A good scientist makes an assumption (hypothesis), tests it against the facts, and either validates or reconsiders it. Evolutionary scientists approach origins from an assumption that there is no God. Creationist scientists approach origins from an assumption that there is a God. It doesn't take a lot of study to find where evolutionary thinkers' assumptions fail, but they refuse to consider the possibility of God. It also doesn't take a lot of study to find scientific discoveries that confirm the Bible. At the end of the day, I can't convince you to take a "scientific" approach to the facts, but hopefully you will. God loves you and has good things ready for you if you will only come to Him.
I was SO fortunate! First lesson in Kindergarten was, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Later, in Biology, when they were talking about evolution, I already knew the Creator and realized they were teaching nonsense.
Science is a religion without a savior. And if they discover something that goes against evolution, they cover it up as if it never existed, that science.
I was a young child when this creeped into our school and we were raised with Christen doctrine but they didn’t warn us that this was happening…but I don’t believe in Darwin or evolution…I believe that my creator is GOD for he is our creator of all things…🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻♥️♥️🇺🇸🇺🇸
@@tone9358 I can promise inanimate matter will never become life, the same as in Darwin's day and the same in yours. Complexity way beyond mankind's capabilities should shake your common sense into accepting this every day observation, complexity necessitates intelligent input, the greater the complexity, the higher the required intellect, your observation without exception. What did you use to type your response? Some matter that evolved over millions of years and became a complex computer? No, it required intelligent design and is simplistic in comparison to you.
@@spamm0145 Big response for a joke comment. I would counter with millions of years of natural section pressure would account for not only the complexity of life but the amount of bio diversity it has as well. Also regardless of religion, life would require inanimate matter becoming life.
@@tone9358disagree, long term lanske experiment in Michigan State University is showing that there hasn't been enough time to go from apes to human let alone dirt to bacteria.
Thank you for your compelling endorsement of Faith in Biblical Creation. Theistic evolution can only distract all who believe and affirm the reality and role of our Lord Jesus Christ, Savoir of all who come to Him for Salvation.
Yeah but if you read the ACTUAL Bible, as in the Bible in the languages in which it was original written in, there is no indication of a six day creation or that evolution didn’t happen.
@@jackdublanica Find the TH-cam channel called “inspiring philosophy.” He has plenty of videos explaining the original Hebrew in Genesis using literature from various scholars.
@@LordMathiouseven as a kid who didn’t know GOD at all, I always thought the idea that we came from monkeys was dumb. It makes no sense. So, I’m praying more people will wake up from this foolishness.
@@LordMathious Are you even looking at the world or just your Western secular bubble? The world as a whole is getting MORE religious, not less. The Western world is crumbling and with it the bastion of secularism
@@LordMathiousCorrect for the developed countries .The prosperous do need the word of God often less then the poor, the weak minded, those who suffer, those are the blessed ones according to the Word.
@@LordMathiousas for society waking up ) you would have to be a complete ignoramus to even claim that, society on a whole has never been more lost, could not be more educated and yet worldwide it’s in a mental and societal crisis due to its blindness. You think truth is decided by numbers eh or developed countries ??? your lord of dribbling fella that’s it.
Compromise has been allowed to creep into the Church and people have become dependent on what they are told without critique and the application of logic. Sin has made us lazy.
"Sin has made us lazy." Not sure how you define lazy when you think you can argue away measurement. Evolutionary biology is not up to you, the layman arguer attempting to use apologetics (which is logical fallacy) to argue that you want to be too lazy to get your degree.
Aetheism and agnosticism has wrought much devastation in my life. God finally reached me at the serendipitous age of 33. I am sad I have thwarted his plans for so long.
Don't be. God is sovereign. He brought you to Himself precisely when He planned to. So, just praise Him for His goodness, mercy, and grace! He saves sinners and turns us into saints! 🙌🏻
@@razark9 how is gods respect for free will a weakness? Wow I wish I had the privilege of being a Christian when I was younger. I hope you keep that mind of yours open though, one day if you do enough truth seeking you may be confronted with the fact that you were in the right neighbourhood to begin with and the place you just moved to ain't so rosey after all. Or maybe it will be your children who realise this and have to pick up your slack.
@@razark9 how is free will not a thing? Please explain. The gospels are the number 1 best selling book every year since books were first printed. How is that an complete absence? the gospels have literally shaped the foundations of societies? And there absences have destroyed societes (eg the dark ages of the catholic Church) Yes you can chose to obey gods word or not and that choice determines whether or not you will be working for gods cause or not. How is that so hard to understand? Nothing I can demonstrate to be true? I beg to differ. The only reason you are even able to doubt the existence of God is because of the theory of evolution. If that rug is pulled out from underneath you, and is proven to be false, the idea of God will be the best explanation for what you see here, all of the design and information and unbelievably precisely arranged structures that ,make up life. And then you will realise that there is alot more evidence for God than you think.
I started questioning evolution in middle school. It did not satisfy the scientific method or agree with the physical laws. As I discovered how irreducibly complex all systems are, I realized that there was zero possibility of any system existing in the universe without a guiding intellegence.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 1 Corinthians 1:18-25
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930, your pride will be your downfall. There is no need to attempt to convince you of the truth of the scriptures, because the only One who can give you the faith to believe is YHVH, incarnate in Christ, and unless He has mercy upon your soul, and turns your hardened heart into a heart of flesh, capable of believing and receiving Jesus Christ as your LORD and Savior, you will remain in unbelief. The believer’s job is not to convince you of the truth of God’s Word. Our job is to tell you the gospel, how you are a sínner whose soùl is condemned to everlasting destruction in the lake of fíre without Christ, and how that Christ paid for your síns on the cross, the righteous Savior dying for the unrighteous sínners who believe on Him, and that He arose from the grave the 3rd day, so that through faith in His shed ßIood, and resurrection, you have been given a new spiritual life in Christ, and your sîns forgiven because the debt you owed was paid by Christ. That’s the gospel of Christ that transforms those who believe into a new creature in Christ, and gives their soûl life everlasting. I have done what YHVH asks of me, and now I put you in His hands, and pray He will have mercy upon you, convict you of your síns against Him, and draw you to Christ for the saIvation of your soul. If you will not hear the gospel I have testified unto you, then YHVH says I am to wipe the dust from my shoes as a judgement against you. May the will of YHVH be done in your life.
First exposed to evolution at University. I already knew Jesus at age 15. I listened to their arguments and concluded that they have great faith. And I would stick to mine. It was simpler.
@@razark9 You may think so. Alternatively, he saw through what claimed to be science but had no persuasive power to con him into a blind materialistic faith. He therefore chose to stick with what made good sense to him. As someone who takes a real interest in science, I have long read and listened to both sides of the creation/evolution debate and have quite consistently arrived at the view that the Bible has it right and is to be trusted. So I have done so for over half a century and continue to do so with confidence. I certainly do NOT consider evolutionist dogma to be scientific.
@@RealHooksy correct I point Xions /christians to there own bible in Mark it says a Christian can drink any poison fiddle with deadly snakes and nothing will harm them but they never answered me and they sure wont drink my Hemlock
I'm a Theistic Evolutionist. Almost all aspects of science make it clear the universe is old. I am specifically avoiding Young Earth Creationism because it might very well make me struggle to determine if it is the Bible or our scientific understanding that is correct.
@LordMathious Please show me one genetic example of one multicelled organism building its genome upwards. Using man as an example, show me an ape losing or gaining an orfan gene.
Over a decade ago, I retired early, and decided some of my free time I would look into the evidence for evolution. I was never happy with its concept, so my mission was to find out the possibility of any truth. I saw many debates online, many concepts, arguments for and against both evolution and creation. Some of the protagonists from both sides seemed well-versed, some very knowledgeable, the bible, microbiology and philosophy were all subjects regularly discussed. Eventually the debates subsided. None of the evolution protagonists could answer the question of how random mutation and natural selectioncould produce a DNA strand that contains the sophisticated information and language we can now detect. I think it also helped that the world's leading geneticist declared that amid 60 million life systems his company had looked at, just a handful had some sort of distant relatedness. He therefore declared that Darwin's theory that all life was related was untrue.
@@LordMathioustrue evolution is adaptation, speciation, selection, and genetic drift within fixed genus/family lines. There is no creative power in DNA replication it's all story telling, we've studied replication for decades plus we have the fossil record. Darwinism is a religious system for atheists
No language in DNA, only "information" to build a protein. 1/64 of all mutations creates a new "information". Only useful information would be preserved. That is why humans have "only" 20,000 genes. Plants have more genes.
The problem with smart people is they realize what ideas are stupid and they realize that christianity brings a lot of positives to society but they are held back in believing because they have such big egos…they think believing they cannot fully explain is foolish…that is their major problem…
@@richardgregory3684 family and honoring the sanctity of marriage not just getting divorces left and right because you married for lust etc…and with that better morals overall on the family…
@@richardgregory3684atheists can’t justify why something is objectivly right or wrong morality become subjective. But if god exist there is a higher standard that we can use to judge. Prove me wrong
The funny thing is that the science of evolution story falls into the faith of the theology with impossible assumptions cannot being tested scientifically, example is “BILLIONS of years or genetic mutations and those are just guessing speculation and probability of something happens, but can not be scientifically proven
In every argument they have they always have some word they use for something they can not proof... Chance, random, luck. And they always have something that they still have to find an answer for. That "something" is always seemingly insignificant and just shrugged of, yet most of us know that, that "something" is actually a HUMONGOUS missing piece.
@@RealHooksy How can a billion years time can be proven?…and I DEMAND!!!…Absolute scientific proves of all bull of the evolution story wich is IMPOSSIBLE!!!…
Evolution is the biggest lie satan has perpetrated against humanity. Unfortunately, most are deceived by it because they have chosen to reject God. So, God is giving them over to a reprobate mind. Most will end up in hell, unfortunately. Matthew 7:13-14
@@richardgregory3684 I'm not going to get drawn into an argument with an unbeliever over evolution. If you are an unbeliever you have more crucial issues than evolution.
@paul. If you mean Lenski’s “evolution” you need to look closer at the detail. E. coli already has the enzymes to be able to break down citrus, but the regulating gene became dysfunctional so that it produced those enzymes constantly. The flagella broke down because it was constantly being stirred. All it shows you is the degradation of the generations winding down like the universe is winding down.
"It takes more faith than I have to be an atheist." You aren't using the word "faith" correctly. It takes a lot more ego to follow your religion. You assume you have a single simple answer to everything, and when it's wrong you dig in, like a child.
@@alextowers3564 "m curious, what do you think would be the position of a person who has no faith at all in anything? What would be their worldview?" Rationality.
Well done! Thank you AIG for your ministry. Had God not led me to you, I would be headed down that same path. May God bless all of your godly endeavors!
If you are true and humble you get it. Do some research about what they find right now about 100:ths of kings names, phrophets, Roman Pontius Pilates on tablets, citys and places found from the Bible. 100% correct. Pyramids and unic tech dissapered around the world in just a moment in time. Dinos and fossils up in Mount Everest. Etc etc. I know. Hope you all will see this in a near future. Peace
110% correct? Tower of babel Adam - nimrod 8 generations Multiple massive city's built And then 50-120 people decided to build a tower All while having many different languages, 8 generations of then same family but somehow all different languages
Hi, what a fantastic explanation, thank you! ❤ One thing I would like to mention though are the titles you choose. I would like to share videos but think the antagonistic titles will put off a number of people by creating an immediate barrier to watching, which is such is a pity. All God's blessings to you in abundance..Amen 🙏💯
@razark9 it's really neat and doesn't explain anything about how a micro raptor or became a cardinal or the links between. 😆 I'm still waiting for them to have brand new lifeforms pop up from their soup....but still waiting
For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path. Psalm 119:105
Jesus taught that God's entire message to humanity hung on two commands of Scripture: to love God with everything one is and to love one's neighbor as one's self (Matthew 22:37-40). It's not surprising that rejection of God's law correlates to a loss of love for God and for others.
💯 Our education system is designed to teach our children that Christianity is the myth, instead of evolution.I am thankful I know Jesus as my Savior, but worry about our lost world.
“Macroevolution” is used to describe the large-scale changes believed to be able to turn a blob of protoplasm into a person. By contrast, “microevolution” is intended to describe the small-scale changes in populations, such as those exhibited by Darwin’s finches-the finch populations change beak sizes regularly in response to environmental pressures. However, they remain finches. No new traits or major changes take place. Since the term evolution is so strongly associated with the particles-to-people myth, we tend to use the word speciation to explain adaptation and variation within the created kinds, such as that exhibited by the finches.Because the small-scale changes generally lead to a loss of genetic information rather than a gain of new information needed to create new traits like arms and eyes, microevolution can never lead to macroevolution. (AIG)
All the friends and family that I know who were pronounced Atheists have committed suicide. It's an idea that darkens the soul and leaves you in perpetual hopelessness. Stay away for your own good.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 The creationist have nothing at all, but lies, people like Ken Ham lie to support their position and they should be ashamed. In debate Bill Nye beat Ken Ham.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 How about "atheists commit crimes, therefore atheism is bad". "Christians commit crimes, therefore christianity is bad". See? I hope you get how idiotic this presentation is.
Psalm 119:105 Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. Job 23:12 I have not departed from the commands of his lips; I have treasured the words of his mouth more than my daily bread. Matthew 4:4 Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God. 1:35
I think there's a question raised in this video that any Christian who believes in evolution must address, if God used evolution that has death as a natural component of it's process, then how can the Bible claim that death came through one man, Adam, as the consequence for sin? It cannot. Just as they must interpret the first several chapters of Genesis as allegorical, these passages must likewise be interpreted as metaphor despite being written as literal theological discourses. And any passage that states that God cannot lie and has no shifting shadow must equally be disregarded as God outright lied about the means of creation, Christ lied when He states God made the world in 7 days. And in the end you're left with a Bible that you sit in judgement over accepting the parts that fit in with what you want to do, and rejecting anything you don't like as "a metaphor" or as "only relevant to that one church or period of time". Or in other words they have the form of godliness, but deny its power and should be avoided as the false teachers they are.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 How could we *eat* the tasty animals God gave us if he didn't make them out _"the same DNA and parts"_ as we're made of? And evolution only seems _"like a valid conclusion"_ if you never examine the details.
This is the problem with just saying "believe in evolution," as I've noticed two starkly different camps that hide between this monolithic word evolution. Camp A, the more conservative and intellectually responsible definition of evolution, says that it simply describes how creatures (that already exist) increase in biodiversity over time. The end. Camp B says that it describes every bit of development on this planet, from molecules to man (price is right incorrect answer buzzer sound). It's not hard to reconcile a RESPONSIBLE, conservative definition of evolution theory with Genesis. Here we go: God created heavens, earth, animals, etc. He gave them the genetic propensity to breed out different traits, reproducing "after their own kind." Man sinned and the curse came. Death entered the world. Natural selection and mutation THEN worked to further diversify animal and plant life. Is this such a "heretical compromise?"
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930: "So you are saying every animal is eat able." I think so. Though not all are healthy. Big fish like tuna live long enough to accumulate a lot of mercury. Edible but slightly poisonous. Though I've heard that people not only eat the king cobra snake but that its poison sack is a delicacy. You swallow it whole. You pass through fire and into ecstasy. Or so I've read. *Sterling:* _"The funny thing is that evolution actually explains ..."_ If it does, it's a fraudulent explanation. Evolution sounds good until you examine the mechanism, the molecules, and you do the math. It fooled me for decades. But I'm no longer fooled by it. Do you know what a protein is?
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 DNA is like a language or code. The fact that all animals share a similar code shows that same language was used. If the language used works for one, why wouldn't he use it for all? That would like an author using a different language for each book he wrote or a programmer using a different language for each app/program he made. Most people don't do that, most stick to one and use that. The problem with this idea of similar DNA meaning common ancestor is that there is no way it could happen, because a change in chromosome count can make thing infertile. And how many different chromosome counts exist? How many different ways are those chromosomes arranged? This asserts that enough of a species had the exact same chromosome count change at the exact same time and this would have happened millions of times over. With chromosome counts you can't have a partial chromosome(would be considered a whole) or an odd number (would be infertile), so the process cannot be gradual. The mathematical probability of this is so low it is virtually impossible. also ken did not say all animals. he said "the tasty animals" where do you get all animals from that?
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 Missed the point. I didn't prove your point at all, did you even read? I said chromosomes COUNT changes can make something infertile. So you are saying that a person with odd number chromosomes can reproduce? Yeah good luck with that. Plus there have rare cases where a person had chromosomes fuse so he had fewer than anyone else, but he is infertile, because it doesn't match. Plus the rare animals who can reproduce with different chromosomes count create offspring that is infertile. What you are saying is changes to chromosomes never makes anything infertile? Evidence says you are so wrong, there are people/animals born with infertility due to changes in chromosomes.
Playing around with sin never pays off in the end. The time for games is over. Jesus is coming back for a holy church. Not a bunch of compromising hypocrites with one foot in the world and the other foot facing God.
@@razark9coming from an atheist that isn't very reassuring. Atheists don't understand our faith and we will not be going to you to figure it out. I can assure you.
"Dear God, I know I am a sinner. I want to turn from my sins, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus Christ is Your Son. I believe He died for my sins and that You raised Him to life. I want Him to come into my heart and to take control of my life. I want to trust Jesus as my Savior and follow Him as my Lord from this day forward. In Jesus' Name, amen." Did you pray this prayer?
Nope, never will, because confessing an imaginary crime to an imagnary being in the hope of being pardoned by something that doesn;t exist because of something else that doesn't exist but should run my life for me is nuts
I am a former atheist. I thought about veins and arteries . I realized they had to come into existence at the same time . Evolution deals with one small change at a time . I heard about the creation account and accepted it by default . Years later I found out it was in the bible . I found out the bible was the word of God . I found out the reason Jesus came to earth and died was to pay the penalty for my sin .
That's a lie, one can't forgive ones self for screwing up by faking their own death. The penalty for not critically thinking is to be taken in by this BS.
@@frosted1030 How about this paradox: blood, veins(any of the tubes forming part of the blood circulation system of the body) and a heart(something that pumps the blood around) must have come around at exactly the same time. there is no way for it to gradually evolve. Better still, the blood MUST come with platelets from the beginning otherwise the organism would die the first time it got the tiniest scratch. again no time for it to gradually evolve. The DNA can't just randomly get thousands of new nucleotides overnight.
"removing the idea of god, from the equation of life". Evolution did no such thing, it didn't need to remove god, because god never made it into the picture; god was completely and utterly superfluous.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 Well no. God is simply an invention, zero proof for any kind of god. And Darwin is no god, not by any stretch. He's simply a scientist that came up with a revolutionary idea that turned out to be true.
You might not believe in Jesus as your Lord and Savior, or even believe that God exists, but it takes only a tiny fraction of the critical thinking you’ve used to prove to yourself that God doesn’t exist to disprove the big bang theory, abiogenesis, and the theory of evolution.
@@beandog4036 Describe to me the causation for the singularity, where the space came from for the "bang" to happen, and the causation of the "bang" itself. What was the exact process used for and chemical makeup of the first organism to form on the earth through abiogenesis? What are the exact mutations and how much time did it take to go from that first organism to arrive at modern day homo sapiens? I'll expect exact answers to all of those within five minutes of this message being published.
@@Inmate533It's exactly the same line of reasoning we use for nonbelief in God that we use to counter those points, ironically. The reasoning goes like this - It is illogical to believe anything for which there is no evidence, it is instead logical to accept that there are some things we don't know yet.
@@alextowers3564 Unfortunately for all of the theories mentioned, the critical bits are the parts that are missing, while the fantasy parts are used to try to disprove God’s creation. For example, background radiation would only be possible if an explosion happened inside of space that already existed, which parallels God’s account of creation, but fails when trying to explain the big bang theory due to the lack of explanation of the already existing space. Every critical step that these theories need to take in order to be plausible sees them fail due to, “we don’t know”.
@@Inmate533 I think you've got it a bit backwards. Science is about finding out what *is* true, not proving that god *isn't.* You can't start with the question of god and then find evidence to disprove him, that's not how that works. And yes, you might possibly be correct with your statement that the universe would have to exist before the big bang. That's why scientists don't claim the big bang is the origin story of the universe. People like Calvin like to tell their followers that this is what scientists, and the evil atheists think, but in reality that's just a strawman. Also, for all the theories you mentioned, they don't actually rely on the holes you think you've found to be demonstrably valid. We don't need to know the exact chemical makeup of the earliest lifeforms to know that abiogenesis is true, for example.
Great video thankyou. This is why Im willing to stand out as a freak in many Christian circles. Evolution does not fit Jesus teachings and purpose (narrative). Its all or nothing
Being antisocial is seriously a tricky thing to some extent. I need to maintain distance from others generally, I have to get to lifespring in five days I think. I would say in relation to the fact that the Bible must be trusted, I have to affirm that the world is 6,000-10,000 years old, but have heard some kind of argument indicating the days could have somehow been eon like in length I think I don’t think that makes sense to entertain specifically in regard to English translations of the Bible as we see them generally but am curious to some extent, focusing on the age of the earth is okay to do I just think there’s a lot more rational things to do in relation to the Christian faith. We need to literally end abortion, homosexuality, gender confusion, and pornography, we need to convert all of God’s elect, we need to convert the Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists, we need to get the Catholic business to reform sufficiently so that they do not seem like enemies to everyone, they need to adopt, practice, and use a Westminster confession of faith for starters.
Well explain, Answers...... truly a gem of a video. Jesus be good, and He be gaining ground everyday. Atheism simply can't stand The Wisdom of Christ our God.
evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community as a well-supported and well-documented theory that explains the diversity of life on Earth. It is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy.
Born and raised in a good Christian home. Darwin never equated to logic in my mind. And even as a youngster going through school I knew what answers I was supposed to put on my tests, so I did. But I never believed anything other then that we were created in the image of God. ✝️
@@HS-zk5nnyou used to be an atheist.......so you used to not believe in 3000 or more gods, now you believe in every God ever invented? How did you come to this conclusion?
@@HS-zk5nn no, by definition I am right... You THINK you are right by what THINK atheist means.... Do some research and don't rely on others for your information
As Answers in Genesis takes the bible as being the Literal Truth then you must also believe that Slavery is OK (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT) I won't mention the parts about Rape, and Murder is also Ok with God
It’s thou shalt not murder. To say thou shalt not murder like modern translations state then God contradicts himself. Nothing can be further from the truth. I wish Christians would be more conscious when they make this statement. Aside from this sticking point, which has launched more debates I have been a apart of than any other topic, this is an excellent video.
Thanks for sharing this wonderful video. I was watching a video awhile back about an evolutionary scientist who had discovered a skeleton which he claimed proved that this land creature had evolved into a whale. Many evolution promoting scientists were so excited! One person who came to see this evolutionary marvel, noticed that the discoverer only had found the front half of a skeleton, and had fabricated the rear half. The skeleton had no fluke, so the man asked the discoverer since you only have half of a skeleton, how do you know this creature was evolving into a whale? The discoverer said, "well I speculated." Is that what science is going to? Speculation?!! Similar to the Scopes Monkey Trial... the tooth of a supposedly ape-man, turned out to be the tooth of a wild pig!!
Such a shame to base your life on fairytales. I'm glad the logical side of me saw through the deeply flawed faith system that I was raised in. As long as you cling to a unfounded human made religious belief (every known religion), it will enforce divisions and hate upon the "others" that are not your group. There is no god. Even if there was, he would not deserve our respect. An all powerful being that allows the stupendous amount of suffering that takes place every day, for most of our existance is by no means "good" or moral.
4:27 Nice! This is an evolution poster from the '70s American satire magazine, National Lampoon. The full image shows Bonobos evolving from black people, Poles evolving from great apes (and being genetically ancestral to toasters), and the French evolving from Baboons. While the last one is fairly accurate, I'm still astonished that AiG used this as a representation of what Evolutionary Biologists believe. Are they just lazy, or are they intentionally trying to tell you lies? Hmm....
01:30 why is it like this now? Because there's been an increase in wickedness in society. Matthew 23:12,13 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. Jesus is describing to the disciples the harsh reality that awaits them after He leaves (John 16:5-7) and before the end of the age when He returns (Revelation 19:11-15). He has said that they will be hated for their association with Him, that they will be persecuted and killed (Matthew 24:9). Many who seem to follow Jesus will fall away due to that pressure and some will even betray the others. False prophets will rise to teach error and lead many people away from the truth of Jesus (Matthew 24:10-11). Now Jesus adds that one result of this false teaching will be disorder: a rejection of standards of goodness and morality. Those who follow the distorted vision offered by false prophets will abandon truth. They will rebel against virtue or submitting to God. The ultimate result of that self-serving, self-following lawlessness will be the loss of love. The imagery of love becoming "cold" evokes a corpse: not merely unmoving, but dead and lifeless. As humanity falls further away from the teachings of Christ, it will become less loving.
I was in matric when an English teacher tried telling us about evolution by using the life cycle of a frog. Kids those days spoke to their parents, who confronted the school and almost got the teacher fired for trying to teach heresy…..this was 1977
Exactly what person can you talk with on video TODAY has actually been "saved" from death AND is at least six hundred years old? Can you find one or is this saying things because you think it makes you look good?
@@betsieswartz "no I cannot." With absolutely no examples to show, you still beLIEve in this trash. Give an example of something you totally beLIEve in, using the exact same methodology. Zero examples and a single well outdated source (by thousands of years) that although translated through three different languages with dozens of different interperatations must be absolutely true? Specifically, cite an example. If you have none, explain why special pleading fallacy convinced you to stop critically thinking.
Interesting enough. Came from a buddhism background and had heard enough that people were coming from worms which is dust. I can't trade with anything that the calling of God, the Creator of man.
@@rf7477the NT is full of truth, actually and the "contradictions" can be easily refuted. Bible scholars help us out with you guys. You guys think you're smart but you guys aren't as clever as you think you are.
@@tone9358 What wickedness is increasing? back in the 50s teachers' main complaints with students were talking out of turn cutting in line and chewing bubblegum now it's drugs r@PE and murder. Yes, the world is getting worse in these times we live in.
I Do not Care what a Mer human thinks because all you hear is ( we think, it is possible, it may have , it is could have and more!) I as a creature made by God The Creator formed me and placed me in the womb of my mother I will Stand! Because my Mother Was told by a Doctor she couldn't have a Child but She Grounded in Her Faithful Prayer's Prayed and Prayed she was lead to Adopt and did then found out 9 months later I Was to Be Praised God For The Blessing now She Was Blessed with Two Boys! So I Will Forever Stand With THE HOLY WORD OF GOD AND MY SAVIOR JESUS!
Anything that takes away from God is dangerous. Anything that takes us away from his word is dangerous. Evolution would be no different. The main purpose of the Christian life is to become more like Christ every day. When we fill our hearts up with worldly things, it hinders God's work in our lives. We should always be seeking to draw closer to God and holding to things like evolution will not do it. Psalm 17:15 As for me, I will see Your face in righteousness; I shall be satisfied when I awake in Your likeness. God bless AIG and all the creationist channels. The Lord bless and protect you 🙏
@@globalcoupledancesJesus is the truth. There is no other truth besides that and anything that proclaims to be the truth apart from the bible is a lie from Satan.
@@globalcoupledances Whether it's knowing the truth or speaking the truth, both are found in a growing relationship with God. When we spend time in God's Word and in prayer, the truth is revealed to us. Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. John 14:6
@@newcreationinchrist1423 I think Jesus was created by the apostles in an attempt to rule the world. That is why His remains had never been found. O.t.o.h. the remains of Santa Claus had been found
@@ritatoczek4037 no, it’s because I know facts. You cannot seriously go around arguing against people who have spent their life’s work proving you wrong. Also, why do none of the creationists in this comment section know how to use spaces?
Great video thank you, At the end of God creating, the Bible states that "God saw that it was good"; and at the 6th day when He had finished He saw that it was very Good. If something created is found to be Good by its Creator(in this case God), and even Very Good, then why would it need changed or evolve? It doesn't need to nor has creation evolved. Adaptation, Yes, Evolution, never. I prayed for this knowledge at a time when I was trying my best to explain it to my Christian brothers at work when I found out they believe in both Creation and evolution as the path of life. Thank God His Word if Flawless and came to my aid for their sakes, not mine.
I definitely believe in adaptation, even long term adaptation. And the ideas of evolution do make sense on the time scale it models itself with but there’s way too many big questions that cannot even be imagined. There is a creator, and his designs are beyond our comprehension. He is a logical god.
@@grantsmythe8625 well, god made nature, it was good. God is everything that represents order and productivity. Anything that goes against our natural order is sinful and counterproductive. If it is reasonable and makes sense it’s holy, only angels and demons and everything spiritual can act supernaturally like possessions, magic, curses as demons do but also walk on water, heal, resurrect and turn water into wine. These may not be logical to us because we are not pure spiritual beings
@@LordMathious I’m not going to spend too much time but I’ll give you this, what was that infinitely small but infinitely dense core that was the universe before the Big Bang? What gave matter the intelligence to design itself into cells? Who crafted the eyeballs that still haven’t been properly explained evolutionary? And finally what is even the point to love, nurture, be neighborly and to treat every man as equals from a Darwinian perspective, if all of us are just differently evolved primates then we all have inherently different values and death is actually a good thing that drives natural selection. God is the only logical reason for any of these, makes a lot more sense then pure chance and coincidence
The origin of life through means of evolution is based upon the starting premise that there is no God. It is an attempt to explain the origin of man with atheism as the interpretive framework of all evidence. There is no reason for Christians to adopt the evolutionary model when we believe that God exists and that He told us how He created the world. The universe was created through miraculous action, and so there is no reason to entertain an explanation that assumes no miracles.
It is an attempt to explain life as it exists today. Colloquially, it is accurate to say it is an explanation for the existence of life in that context. Technically speaking, no evolution does not explain life life, as in the very first self-replicating organism. Which is a pretty big problem for atheists. As ridiculous a story as increased complexity through random mutation and selective death is, at least there is some proposed mechanism. But what is the mechanism for life from non-life?
a god existing isn't totally ruled out by evolution, we don't know what created physics and chemistry which could be designed, but it does disprove christianity
@@Ballondorwinner Evolution does not work without God. God, however, does not need evolution, and evolution appears to be inconsistent with the way God tells us He did things.
Your content is always spot on, easily digestible and very well presented. Thank you very much. Please forgive me, your choice of music is, at best, irritating if not overwhelming (IMO). I have to force myself to lipread in order to concentrate on your message. Ethereal, and way too loud, it dominates and obfuscates the presentation. My apologies. I will continue to view...
The Theory of Evolution is Evil. It denies Jesus the Glory He deserves. It denies God the Glory He deserves. Ideas have consequences. The Nazis took Darwin's Model so seriously, they killed all Jews and Black people for being subhuman (or so they thought.) Darwin's Model showed apes slowly stand upright and become more Caucasian as they evolved. So, they thought black people were closer to being apes than human. But, The Holy Bible teaches us that humanity came from one man and one woman who were perfect and reproduced. Their DNA contained the information to create all skin colors, eye colors, hair colors, height, weight, and shapes you see today. White people and black people share the same ancestor.
@@johnwebb4499 Not necessarily. When you look at the original Hebrew language that genesis was written in, there is no indication of a strict 6 day creation or anything disproving that evolution occurred. God likely just guided evolution. That doesn’t take God out of anything. If evolution did happen and God guided it, then that’s still a magnificent thing worthy of praise.
@@ResistTheGreatReplacementEU Nope. The first chapter, Genesis says God created Everything in 6 Earth days. On the 7th day He rested. God's favorite number is 7. The English (KJ) Bible is written in code. The Hebrews Bible is written in code with geometric codes. God's book is Perfect. NOTHING EVOLVED. GOD CREATED ALL KINDS OF EVERY CREATURE IN THOSE 1ST SIX DAYS. Many scientists believe in Creation, but they don't admit it. They are expected to tow the company line. If they were proven wrong they'd be out of a job.
Christians should never validate anything from the theory of evolution. Only go according to what The Bible says. This means the Universe is 6,000-7,000 yrs old. If any species did evolve, it was cuz God foresaw it and allowed it. Also, the great flood happened. Killing the dragons/dinosaurs. Life had to start from One Male One Female all over again. To get it right. 75% of The Bible is Prophecy. History rhymes
I keep hearing people say thou shalt not kill but the commandment is thou shalt not murder / commit murder. The Bible clearly states that there is a time/ season to kill.
Murder is definitionally bad. It's defined as "unwarranted killing". So God said "Killing for a bad reason is bad". Only the most profound messages from the universe's most powerful being 🙏
Yep, I’m sticking with Genesis with this one. Two opposing ideas can not both be true and make sense. Something will be corrupted along the way between the two of them. I also, I think Darwin Evolution is another version of subjective understanding in the end. It sounds plausible, like most subjective ideas, but it always misses “The Why did it happen this way,” question. If it’s so random, then we should not be able to “observe” it. If it’s not random, then it also suggest that a creator planned it to work a specific way. Keep up the good work, A.I.G.
There's something strange about this kind of video. We don't decide whether to accept any other scientific theories based on the consequenses of doing so. Why should that be a determining factor in whether to accept evolution or not?
Because these theories deal with human morality and behavior which affects all society for better or worse. It's just important to study worldview to see what is best for humankind.
@@HamnimationStudios Sure, we should study world views and how they affect humankind, but whether or not we accept a scientific theory should be based on examining the evidence and not if we like it or not. Do you really disagree with that?
@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 You raise an important question. Nevertheless, differing conclusions still often result from the same material, leading to some making inferences that have effects outside of the main body of science. We don't disagree with examination of evidence; we just notice that impartial facts often create opinions. Good points, though!
@@HamnimationStudios I don't disagree with that. We approach evidence differently and differ on what constitutes valid evidence. No doubt that has an effect on our conclusions. That's all fine, as long as we can examine the evidence without being too distracted by our world views and accept that what we want to be true and what is doesn't have to match.
Hello ,I am an atheist but I think of myself as a moral person . Evolution has made me the observant and conscious man that can question the difference between good and evil. And like 99% of humanity I embrace goodness. God didn't inform my moral stance. Be good to your fellow humans and every living thing on earth. Thanks.
Then are you the standard of right and wrong that we should strive to be and be more like you? I'm not saying this sarcastically lol but just asking you to ponder the question.
@@ResistTheGreatReplacementEUthe same could be said for you. Even people in their own religions interpret their text differently especially christianity which causes them to have different morals, some directly contradictory. Whos to say whos right in that situation. Goodness is perceptual
@@LordMathious "Just like that"? I wonder how you account for our amazingly complex brains? Also, how do you account for the range of different concepts of goodness among the international atheist community?
Science is all about process and religion is about value. Science is all about how and religion is all about why. Science and GOD can correlate but when a process is more pioritised than the value then atheist have no hope.
@@LordMathious becauss science is all about the process. Religion is literally what nurture society and kingdoms. Proper kindoms bore smart people and smart people study the process of the reality. Religion, why, value and intention is more important to learn than the process because its what nurtures humanity. Tell me is loving yourself and others faith or science. You have to keep in mind there is no evidence that we should love ourselves and others.
Many years I admired William lane craig, how enthusiast he is with the gospel. His believe in Bigbang/Evolution theory did I ignore, however the last vew years I start to doubt is this man reborn, is he saved ? Average people will of course answer , it's up to God, but what is our opinion
@@RedDotInABlueState91 yes because 99% of people who have dedicated their lives are wrong and a random book full of fairy tales is right. I’m not making false claims, I’m trying to stop misinformation. Not for people like you, you’re already too far gone, especially judging by your name. I’m letting people who are on the fence how ridiculous creation is. I’m also telling the channel to stop attempting to corrupt people’s minds, especially when they are to ignoring any evidence that contradicts their claims, and only looking for what benefits what they want to believe. No claims I’ve made are false, not like you’d know. I already touched on this, but that name is possibly the worst thing I’ve seen in this thread, and that’s saying a lot when it’s mostly people believing in creation. But the point is, if you want to see false claims, just watch the video.
Don't cosmologists know that when you change the parameters to measure the speed of light that you also change the speed of light? Distance is expanded and time speeds up where there is no matter in our line of sight between galaxies. The fact that we can see or detect light from distant galaxies means that those distant galaxies are actually closer to us than our own Sagittarius A. black hole in the center of our galaxy because we can see redshifted light from galaxies and we CANNOT see the light from within a black hole since the light in a black hole is redshifted out of range of our detection. The light from distant galaxies are redshifted because the galaxies that we are seeing are more massive than ours and the light that we are seeing is from deep within the centers of those massive galaxies. So the light we are seeing is deeply redshifted as it leaves the distant galaxies and only slightly blue-shifted coming into our less massive galaxy where we are not even in the center of our smaller galaxy. So the universe is not expanding into oblivion for no reason. Dark energy is associated with black holes that are absorbing frames of reference of time and space. They are NOT "inflating" for no reason. They are increasing in size from absorbing space time regardless of the amount of matter they absorb. So there are no inflatons and no dark matter particles and superluminal motion is NOT seven times the speed of light. You can't project our measures of time and distance onto the rest of the universe. Please make a note of it ...and the light from distant galaxies is arriving much faster than you realize.
I'm not an expert, but this kinda makes sense. When it comes to starlight in space you either have to assume light has a fixed speed or that it fluctuates depending on where in the universe it is. Evolution has to assume it's a fixed speed, otherwise the whole age of the universe will come into question again.
Disagree. How can you increase the speed of light in a vacuum, that throws Einstein's equations right out the window 😂 and everything we've observed about space time confirms Einstein's maths. The laws of physics don't just go out the window because light happens to be traveling between galaxies. Also, your argument assumes all galaxies are red shifted, they aren't. Andromeda is the closest galaxy to us and it's heavily blue shifted because it's moving towards us. Also, what's your evidence for black holes expanding by absorption of space time? Singularitys infinitely compress spacetime in a localised region inside the event horizon, but we've never seen evidence of it affecting spacetime outside the event horizon so no idea where you pulled that rabbit out of. Your argument also says that other galaxys are closer than Sagittarius A, which is our supermassive black hole, inside our galaxy which by extension means all other galaxys are inside ours?! God is infinitely wise, there are answers to the distance and visibility problem if you're a young earth creationist but I honestly don't know what the solution is, but I'm not going to throw physics out the window because I don't have an answer yet.
Einstein doesnt determine the laws of physics. God does. Einstein did his best to observe them. We absolutely can throw his discoveries out, and ought to be open to the idea of doing so. 'Science' is constantly changing. God is not.
Time speeds up asymptotically to a maximum when going away from a massive object like a galaxy. The speed-up going from interstellar space within our galaxy to far away from any galaxy is tiny. Less than two seconds per day with the below assumptions: Assuming all the mass of the galaxy is within a 26,000 light year radius sphere (Earth's distance from the galaxy centre), I calculate that the time runs 0.999982 times as fast as in intergalactic space at Earth's distance from the centre: √(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×26000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.999982 When a clock in intergalactic space has ticked one second, a clock at Earth's distance from the galaxy centre has completed 0.999982 seconds. Equation under heading: Outside a non-rotating sphere In the Wikipedia article 'Gravitational time dilation' The above calculation assumes intergalactic space is infinitely far away from any source of gravity. If we instead go a million light years away from our galaxy centre, the time there runs 0.9999995 as fast as at infinite distance. √(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×1000000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.9999995. If we go a billion light years away the time there runs 0.9999999995 as fast as at infinite distance √(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×1000000000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.9999999995
![[LIVE] นาทีนี้ต้องพี่ทนาย | ทนายแก้ว vs ทนายไพศาล | #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.47 (02/11/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HmquaO-PL_M/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for this. More Christians need to take this seriously.
I think many Christians are too busy playing x box and hanging out with friends to read their Bible. On the same note, there are many who are becoming on fire for God. 🙏✝️
@razark9 strange that you would bother with videos from answers in Genesis if your only purpose is to troll people. If you truly prescribe to a materialistic, evolutionary mindset, why bother arguing the point? If everything is random, your thought process is no more ordered than anything else and is simply the result of chance. I pray that God would use these videos to save you as you watch them to indulge your sinful desire to insult people.
O he talking about the bible gods why did not Smith say their names?
Why? Also how many people is it acceptable to own?
@razark9 I'm not sure why, but I don't see this comment directly, so I may not see future replies either. That being the case, I'll try not to ask questions that demand an answer.
I bring up the evolutionary mindset because that is the general cause of this debate. Neither the big bang nor evolution over millions of years have been proven. They are theories.
Science is the systematic study of repeatable, observable phenomena. We cannot study the origin of the universe fromm a purely scientific standpoint. All we can do is look at what we understand and extrapolate it backwards, which is likely to lead to some misunderstandings regardless. However, you can't do any of this without making some assumptions. A good scientist makes an assumption (hypothesis), tests it against the facts, and either validates or reconsiders it.
Evolutionary scientists approach origins from an assumption that there is no God.
Creationist scientists approach origins from an assumption that there is a God.
It doesn't take a lot of study to find where evolutionary thinkers' assumptions fail, but they refuse to consider the possibility of God. It also doesn't take a lot of study to find scientific discoveries that confirm the Bible.
At the end of the day, I can't convince you to take a "scientific" approach to the facts, but hopefully you will.
God loves you and has good things ready for you if you will only come to Him.
"Where there is no God there is no man either." [Berdyaev]
Are you implying that women are evil?????
*Where there is no man, there is no God.
@@xultsch NONSENSE
I was SO fortunate! First lesson in Kindergarten was, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Later, in Biology, when they were talking about evolution, I already knew the Creator and realized they were teaching nonsense.
@@captivedesk3168 Science was one of the subjects I did well in.
@@Torby4096 did you hit your head and forget it all?
Science is a religion without a savior. And if they discover something that goes against evolution, they cover it up as if it never existed, that science.
@@captivedesk3168the data are the same; it's the conclusions which are different.
@@KalonOrdona2 yes, we see 2+2=4 and yet creationists say no its 5.
I was a young child when this creeped into our school and we were raised with Christen doctrine but they didn’t warn us that this was happening…but I don’t believe in Darwin or evolution…I believe that my creator is GOD for he is our creator of all things…🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻♥️♥️🇺🇸🇺🇸
No I can promise you Charles Darwin is real.
@@tone9358 I can promise inanimate matter will never become life, the same as in Darwin's day and the same in yours. Complexity way beyond mankind's capabilities should shake your common sense into accepting this every day observation, complexity necessitates intelligent input, the greater the complexity, the higher the required intellect, your observation without exception. What did you use to type your response? Some matter that evolved over millions of years and became a complex computer? No, it required intelligent design and is simplistic in comparison to you.
@@spamm0145 Big response for a joke comment. I would counter with millions of years of natural section pressure would account for not only the complexity of life but the amount of bio diversity it has as well. Also regardless of religion, life would require inanimate matter becoming life.
@@tone9358disagree, long term lanske experiment in Michigan State University is showing that there hasn't been enough time to go from apes to human let alone dirt to bacteria.
@spamm0145 - Adam from dirt was inanimate matter become life. Prometheus did the same: first man from clay. So it is normal
Appreciation n blessings from Sydney Australia.
Thank you for your compelling endorsement of Faith in Biblical Creation. Theistic evolution can only distract all who believe and affirm the reality and role of our Lord Jesus Christ, Savoir of all who come to Him for Salvation.
Yeah but if you read the ACTUAL Bible, as in the Bible in the languages in which it was original written in, there is no indication of a six day creation or that evolution didn’t happen.
Where do you get that? Not everyone has access to these original manuscripts. If you want to prove your argument please present them.
@@ResistTheGreatReplacementEU In Hebrew? : )
@@jackdublanica
Find the TH-cam channel called “inspiring philosophy.” He has plenty of videos explaining the original Hebrew in Genesis using literature from various scholars.
@@calvinsmith7575
Yes.
We are taught in school that Evolution is an absolute FACT. No wonder society is falling away from God.
@@LordMathiouseven as a kid who didn’t know GOD at all, I always thought the idea that we came from monkeys was dumb. It makes no sense. So, I’m praying more people will wake up from this foolishness.
@@LordMathious Are you even looking at the world or just your Western secular bubble? The world as a whole is getting MORE religious, not less. The Western world is crumbling and with it the bastion of secularism
@@LordMathiousCorrect for the developed countries .The prosperous do need the word of God often less then the poor, the weak minded, those who suffer, those are the blessed ones according to the Word.
well some people really think that primitive bacteria are their long lost relatives. in their case it might be actually true 🤣🤣
@@LordMathiousas for society waking up ) you would have to be a complete ignoramus to even claim that, society on a whole has never been more lost, could not be more educated and yet worldwide it’s in a mental and societal crisis due to its blindness. You think truth is decided by numbers eh or developed countries ??? your lord of dribbling fella that’s it.
Compromise has been allowed to creep into the Church and people have become dependent on what they are told without critique and the application of logic. Sin has made us lazy.
"Sin has made us lazy." Not sure how you define lazy when you think you can argue away measurement. Evolutionary biology is not up to you, the layman arguer attempting to use apologetics (which is logical fallacy) to argue that you want to be too lazy to get your degree.
Aetheism and agnosticism has wrought much devastation in my life. God finally reached me at the serendipitous age of 33. I am sad I have thwarted his plans for so long.
Don't be. God is sovereign. He brought you to Himself precisely when He planned to. So, just praise Him for His goodness, mercy, and grace! He saves sinners and turns us into saints! 🙌🏻
Likewise. So glad I abandoned it.
@@razark9 how is gods respect for free will a weakness? Wow I wish I had the privilege of being a Christian when I was younger. I hope you keep that mind of yours open though, one day if you do enough truth seeking you may be confronted with the fact that you were in the right neighbourhood to begin with and the place you just moved to ain't so rosey after all. Or maybe it will be your children who realise this and have to pick up your slack.
@@razark9 how is free will not a thing? Please explain. The gospels are the number 1 best selling book every year since books were first printed. How is that an complete absence? the gospels have literally shaped the foundations of societies? And there absences have destroyed societes (eg the dark ages of the catholic Church) Yes you can chose to obey gods word or not and that choice determines whether or not you will be working for gods cause or not. How is that so hard to understand?
Nothing I can demonstrate to be true? I beg to differ. The only reason you are even able to doubt the existence of God is because of the theory of evolution. If that rug is pulled out from underneath you, and is proven to be false, the idea of God will be the best explanation for what you see here, all of the design and information and unbelievably precisely arranged structures that ,make up life. And then you will realise that there is alot more evidence for God than you think.
You were doing so well, and you went and ruined it.
I started questioning evolution in middle school. It did not satisfy the scientific method or agree with the physical laws. As I discovered how irreducibly complex all systems are, I realized that there was zero possibility of any system existing in the universe without a guiding intellegence.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
1 Corinthians 1:18-25
@@minnaraitinpaa6834, Amen. May Jesus bless you.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930, your pride will be your downfall. There is no need to attempt to convince you of the truth of the scriptures, because the only One who can give you the faith to believe is YHVH, incarnate in Christ, and unless He has mercy upon your soul, and turns your hardened heart into a heart of flesh, capable of believing and receiving Jesus Christ as your LORD and Savior, you will remain in unbelief. The believer’s job is not to convince you of the truth of God’s Word. Our job is to tell you the gospel, how you are a sínner whose soùl is condemned to everlasting destruction in the lake of fíre without Christ, and how that Christ paid for your síns on the cross, the righteous Savior dying for the unrighteous sínners who believe on Him, and that He arose from the grave the 3rd day, so that through faith in His shed ßIood, and resurrection, you have been given a new spiritual life in Christ, and your sîns forgiven because the debt you owed was paid by Christ. That’s the gospel of Christ that transforms those who believe into a new creature in Christ, and gives their soûl life everlasting. I have done what YHVH asks of me, and now I put you in His hands, and pray He will have mercy upon you, convict you of your síns against Him, and draw you to Christ for the saIvation of your soul. If you will not hear the gospel I have testified unto you, then YHVH says I am to wipe the dust from my shoes as a judgement against you. May the will of YHVH be done in your life.
You were wrong
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930please explain carbon dating without googling.
First exposed to evolution at University. I already knew Jesus at age 15. I listened to their arguments and concluded that they have great faith. And I would stick to mine. It was simpler.
@@razark9
You may think so.
Alternatively, he saw through what claimed to be science but had no persuasive power to con him into a blind materialistic faith.
He therefore chose to stick with what made good sense to him.
As someone who takes a real interest in science, I have long read and listened to both sides of the creation/evolution debate and have quite consistently arrived at the view that the Bible has it right and is to be trusted.
So I have done so for over half a century and continue to do so with confidence.
I certainly do NOT consider evolutionist dogma to be scientific.
It’s not faith, it’s understanding.
You don’t need faith if you understand things.
Faith is only required when you can’t show something to be true.
So is the Jew Jesus a god ? Dare you answer? take care its a trap all christians fall into
@@razark9 I like you friend
@@RealHooksy correct I point Xions /christians to there own bible
in Mark it says a Christian can drink any poison fiddle with deadly snakes
and nothing will harm them but they never answered me and they sure wont drink my Hemlock
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.
Evolution is a theory that sounds good at first but the more you think about it the less sense it makes.
I'm a Theistic Evolutionist. Almost all aspects of science make it clear the universe is old. I am specifically avoiding Young Earth Creationism because it might very well make me struggle to determine if it is the Bible or our scientific understanding that is correct.
Imagine thinking primitive bacteria are your long lost relatives 🤣😂🥴
@@TheSpacePlaceYT Did you see Joe Rogan interview with Stephen Meyer? he used to be a theistic evolutionist too
Jeffrey Dahmer believed in evolution. Look what that lead to..
@LordMathious Please show me one genetic example of one multicelled organism building its genome upwards.
Using man as an example, show me an ape losing or gaining an orfan gene.
Over a decade ago, I retired early, and decided some of my free time I would look into the evidence for evolution. I was never happy with its concept, so my mission was to find out the possibility of any truth. I saw many debates online, many concepts, arguments for and against both evolution and creation. Some of the protagonists from both sides seemed well-versed, some very knowledgeable, the bible, microbiology and philosophy were all subjects regularly discussed.
Eventually the debates subsided. None of the evolution protagonists could answer the question of how random mutation and natural selectioncould produce a DNA strand that contains the sophisticated information and language we can now detect. I think it also helped that the world's leading geneticist declared that amid 60 million life systems his company had looked at, just a handful had some sort of distant relatedness. He therefore declared that Darwin's theory that all life was related was untrue.
Phylogenetic tree of ribosomes shows that all life is related
Amen. I also find that as very compelling evidence against naturalism and evolution 🙂🙏✝️
@@LordMathioustrue evolution is adaptation, speciation, selection, and genetic drift within fixed genus/family lines. There is no creative power in DNA replication it's all story telling, we've studied replication for decades plus we have the fossil record. Darwinism is a religious system for atheists
No language in DNA, only "information" to build a protein. 1/64 of all mutations creates a new "information". Only useful information would be preserved. That is why humans have "only" 20,000 genes. Plants have more genes.
Which leading geneticist? I'll cite them ( please note the correct pronoun) in my presentations (witnessing). Thanx
The problem with smart people is they realize what ideas are stupid and they realize that christianity brings a lot of positives to society but they are held back in believing because they have such big egos…they think believing they cannot fully explain is foolish…that is their major problem…
What positives are are *uniquely* brought to society by Christianity?
@@richardgregory3684 family and honoring the sanctity of marriage not just getting divorces left and right because you married for lust etc…and with that better morals overall on the family…
@@BigOleMatty Nothing uniquely Christian about marriage. And what "better morals"?
@@richardgregory3684atheists can’t justify why something is objectivly right or wrong morality become subjective. But if god exist there is a higher standard that we can use to judge. Prove me wrong
@@razark9false. The pioneers of modern science were mostly Christians.
The funny thing is that the science of evolution story falls into the faith of the theology with impossible assumptions cannot being tested scientifically, example is “BILLIONS of years or genetic mutations and those are just guessing speculation and probability of something happens, but can not be scientifically proven
In every argument they have they always have some word they use for something they can not proof... Chance, random, luck. And they always have something that they still have to find an answer for. That "something" is always seemingly insignificant and just shrugged of, yet most of us know that, that "something" is actually a HUMONGOUS missing piece.
It’s all been proven, and no god has ever been proven. None. Ever.
@@RealHooksy How can a billion years time can be proven?…and I DEMAND!!!…Absolute scientific proves of all bull of the evolution story wich is IMPOSSIBLE!!!…
Scientific method is testing a hypothesis and observe the result. And repeat that
@@globalcoupledances that’s one scientific method yes.
Great video and very informative. Thank you to all at AIG who made this video possible. God bless.
Amen jojo
Amen 🙏🙏🙏
Garbage in garbage out. You are relying on biased sources.
@@razark9Imma little late but totally agree that it is indeed the exact opposite of informative 😂
@@frosted1030and you aren't? Lol
Evolution is the biggest lie satan has perpetrated against humanity. Unfortunately, most are deceived by it because they have chosen to reject God. So, God is giving them over to a reprobate mind. Most will end up in hell, unfortunately. Matthew 7:13-14
@@LordMathiousno offense but if I'm going to get advice on anything it will not be from an atheist.
MORE OF THIS, LESS OF NOT THIS!!!! Thank you for making this content!!!
Amen AIG. Evolution leads away from Christ and salvation.
Why does it?
@@richardgregory3684 are you a Christian?
@@roberta7187 No, but lots of Christians have no issue with evolution.
@@richardgregory3684 I'm not going to get drawn into an argument with an unbeliever over evolution. If you are an unbeliever you have more crucial issues than evolution.
I believe in micro evolution and adaptation. Contemporary evolution and the supposed random origin of life is what I doubt.
"Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening."
Richard Dawkins was absolutely correct in this statement.
Quote mining is dishonest
@@captivedesk3168 desk, putting your head in the sand is illogical and eventually fatal.
Yes he was, and still is.
Actually it has just recently. Study done on single celled organisms.
@paul. If you mean Lenski’s “evolution” you need to look closer at the detail. E. coli already has the enzymes to be able to break down citrus, but the regulating gene became dysfunctional so that it produced those enzymes constantly. The flagella broke down because it was constantly being stirred. All it shows you is the degradation of the generations winding down like the universe is winding down.
It takes more faith than I have to be an atheist.
It takes no faith at all to be an athiest, just a little doubt about the supernatural claims of religion.
Repeating Turek the grifter makes you oh so special
"It takes more faith than I have to be an atheist." You aren't using the word "faith" correctly. It takes a lot more ego to follow your religion. You assume you have a single simple answer to everything, and when it's wrong you dig in, like a child.
I'm curious, what do you think would be the position of a person who has no faith at all in anything? What would be their worldview?
@@alextowers3564 "m curious, what do you think would be the position of a person who has no faith at all in anything? What would be their worldview?" Rationality.
Well done! Thank you AIG for your ministry. Had God not led me to you, I would be headed down that same path. May God bless all of your godly endeavors!
Bless you too, meg.
@@LordMathiousPraise the Lord that he led me out of it!
as a PhD scientist - indeed AIG is doing a great job!
Which god, Allah, or Zeus?
@@LordMathious You can lead a Theist to evolution but you can't make them think.
Lloyd DeJongh has many outstanding videos on this subject. God bless all who are warning the people.
The Bible is 110% correct. End of discussion.
If you are true and humble you get it. Do some research about what they find right now about 100:ths of kings names, phrophets, Roman Pontius Pilates on tablets, citys and places found from the Bible. 100% correct. Pyramids and unic tech dissapered around the world in just a moment in time. Dinos and fossils up in Mount Everest. Etc etc. I know. Hope you all will see this in a near future. Peace
nope, start of discussion, prove how
110% correct?
Tower of babel Adam - nimrod
8 generations
Multiple massive city's built
And then 50-120 people decided to build a tower
All while having many different languages, 8 generations of then same family but somehow all different languages
It's easy to prove that the bible is not correct.
Interesting title, but completely true. Without evolution there wouldn't be humans, and these tragedies wouldn't have happened.
Hi, what a fantastic explanation, thank you! ❤
One thing I would like to mention though are the titles you choose. I would like to share videos but think the antagonistic titles will put off a number of people by creating an immediate barrier to watching, which is such is a pity. All God's blessings to you in abundance..Amen 🙏💯
Personally, I had a problem with evolution when I kept being shown "65 million year old" dinosaur fossils, but no actual links for anything earlier.
@razark9 it's really neat and doesn't explain anything about how a micro raptor or became a cardinal or the links between. 😆
I'm still waiting for them to have brand new lifeforms pop up from their soup....but still waiting
Earliest dinosaurs were in Triassic. They looked like Euparkeria
@@paddywop918try Google, simple....or just stay ignorant ether way
@@paddywop918it does, in fact, explain how. You just look it over because you can’t have your “pReCiOus fAItH” shattered.
For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.
Hebrews 4:12
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path.
Psalm 119:105
Jesus taught that God's entire message to humanity hung on two commands of Scripture: to love God with everything one is and to love one's neighbor as one's self (Matthew 22:37-40). It's not surprising that rejection of God's law correlates to a loss of love for God and for others.
Owning people is wrong. Doesn't matter if people or boogeymen say its ok its not
💯 Our education system is designed to teach our children that Christianity is the myth, instead of evolution.I am thankful I know Jesus as my Savior, but worry about our lost world.
Teaching evolution is one of the few things the education system does right
“Macroevolution” is used to describe the large-scale changes believed to be able to turn a blob of protoplasm into a person. By contrast, “microevolution” is intended to describe the small-scale changes in populations, such as those exhibited by Darwin’s finches-the finch populations change beak sizes regularly in response to environmental pressures. However, they remain finches. No new traits or major changes take place.
Since the term evolution is so strongly associated with the particles-to-people myth, we tend to use the word speciation to explain adaptation and variation within the created kinds, such as that exhibited by the finches.Because the small-scale changes generally lead to a loss of genetic information rather than a gain of new information needed to create new traits like arms and eyes, microevolution can never lead to macroevolution. (AIG)
It’s all just evolution plus time.
@@RealHooksy time isn't a magic wand you can wave around that does anything you want it to.
@@zerosteel0123 well your god is apparently
@@RealHooksy only because you don't know Him. Lol
Of course you think that.
Explain what a kind is.
All the friends and family that I know who were pronounced Atheists have committed suicide. It's an idea that darkens the soul and leaves you in perpetual hopelessness. Stay away for your own good.
I think, all Christians should watch this video, to see how weak the creationist position is.
It's not weak at all
@@RedDotInABlueState91 The creationist have nothing at all, but lies, people like Ken Ham lie to support their position and they should be ashamed. In debate Bill Nye beat Ken Ham.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 What? It's *utterly* weak. There is nothing but nonsense in this presentation, and it's obvious. Do you not see that?
@@hongotedesco8931 What I see is you making a claim about this video without citing any specific examples.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 How about "atheists commit crimes, therefore atheism is bad". "Christians commit crimes, therefore christianity is bad". See? I hope you get how idiotic this presentation is.
Psalm 119:105
Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.
Job 23:12
I have not departed from the commands of his lips; I have treasured the words of his mouth more than my daily bread.
Matthew 4:4
Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.
1:35
I think there's a question raised in this video that any Christian who believes in evolution must address, if God used evolution that has death as a natural component of it's process, then how can the Bible claim that death came through one man, Adam, as the consequence for sin? It cannot. Just as they must interpret the first several chapters of Genesis as allegorical, these passages must likewise be interpreted as metaphor despite being written as literal theological discourses. And any passage that states that God cannot lie and has no shifting shadow must equally be disregarded as God outright lied about the means of creation, Christ lied when He states God made the world in 7 days. And in the end you're left with a Bible that you sit in judgement over accepting the parts that fit in with what you want to do, and rejecting anything you don't like as "a metaphor" or as "only relevant to that one church or period of time". Or in other words they have the form of godliness, but deny its power and should be avoided as the false teachers they are.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 How could we *eat* the tasty animals God gave us if he didn't make them out _"the same DNA and parts"_ as we're made of?
And evolution only seems _"like a valid conclusion"_ if you never examine the details.
This is the problem with just saying "believe in evolution," as I've noticed two starkly different camps that hide between this monolithic word evolution. Camp A, the more conservative and intellectually responsible definition of evolution, says that it simply describes how creatures (that already exist) increase in biodiversity over time. The end. Camp B says that it describes every bit of development on this planet, from molecules to man (price is right incorrect answer buzzer sound).
It's not hard to reconcile a RESPONSIBLE, conservative definition of evolution theory with Genesis. Here we go:
God created heavens, earth, animals, etc. He gave them the genetic propensity to breed out different traits, reproducing "after their own kind." Man sinned and the curse came. Death entered the world. Natural selection and mutation THEN worked to further diversify animal and plant life.
Is this such a "heretical compromise?"
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930: "So you are saying every animal is eat able."
I think so. Though not all are healthy. Big fish like tuna live long enough to accumulate a lot of mercury. Edible but slightly poisonous.
Though I've heard that people not only eat the king cobra snake but that its poison sack is a delicacy. You swallow it whole. You pass through fire and into ecstasy. Or so I've read.
*Sterling:* _"The funny thing is that evolution actually explains ..."_
If it does, it's a fraudulent explanation. Evolution sounds good until you examine the mechanism, the molecules, and you do the math. It fooled me for decades. But I'm no longer fooled by it.
Do you know what a protein is?
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 DNA is like a language or code. The fact that all animals share a similar code shows that same language was used. If the language used works for one, why wouldn't he use it for all? That would like an author using a different language for each book he wrote or a programmer using a different language for each app/program he made. Most people don't do that, most stick to one and use that.
The problem with this idea of similar DNA meaning common ancestor is that there is no way it could happen, because a change in chromosome count can make thing infertile. And how many different chromosome counts exist? How many different ways are those chromosomes arranged? This asserts that enough of a species had the exact same chromosome count change at the exact same time and this would have happened millions of times over. With chromosome counts you can't have a partial chromosome(would be considered a whole) or an odd number (would be infertile), so the process cannot be gradual. The mathematical probability of this is so low it is virtually impossible.
also ken did not say all animals. he said "the tasty animals" where do you get all animals from that?
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 Missed the point. I didn't prove your point at all, did you even read? I said chromosomes COUNT changes can make something infertile. So you are saying that a person with odd number chromosomes can reproduce? Yeah good luck with that. Plus there have rare cases where a person had chromosomes fuse so he had fewer than anyone else, but he is infertile, because it doesn't match. Plus the rare animals who can reproduce with different chromosomes count create offspring that is infertile.
What you are saying is changes to chromosomes never makes anything infertile? Evidence says you are so wrong, there are people/animals born with infertility due to changes in chromosomes.
Playing around with sin never pays off in the end. The time for games is over.
Jesus is coming back for a holy church. Not a bunch of compromising hypocrites with one foot in the world and the other foot facing God.
@@razark9coming from an atheist that isn't very reassuring. Atheists don't understand our faith and we will not be going to you to figure it out. I can assure you.
"Dear God, I know I am a sinner. I want to turn from my sins, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe that Jesus Christ is Your Son. I believe He died for my sins and that You raised Him to life. I want Him to come into my heart and to take control of my life. I want to trust Jesus as my Savior and follow Him as my Lord from this day forward. In Jesus' Name, amen."
Did you pray this prayer?
Nope, never will, because confessing an imaginary crime to an imagnary being in the hope of being pardoned by something that doesn;t exist because of something else that doesn't exist but should run my life for me is nuts
@@richardgregory3684Hell is not imaginary.
@@jsshay01 Prove it, otherwise, there's no reason to believe it exists, any more than you believ ein Valhalla or the Field of Reeds.
richardgregory, yet you will bow to Him, one day.
@@judithmargret5972 I won't, he's not real.
Another great history lesson, blessings. This has helped with my understanding of a bite of my history.
Send to Trace, please.
Read an actual science book if you care about science
Great video
Really well put together these AIG videos are!
Yes, master yoda
I am a former atheist. I thought about veins and arteries . I realized they had to come into existence at the same time . Evolution deals with one small change at a time . I heard about the creation account and accepted it by default . Years later I found out it was in the bible . I found out the bible was the word of God . I found out the reason Jesus came to earth and died was to pay the penalty for my sin .
Not really, you can have proto veins and arteries, that make nutrient transport to cell more efficent withoht abandoning the prior method.
most or all insects and worms have only arteries
That's a lie, one can't forgive ones self for screwing up by faking their own death. The penalty for not critically thinking is to be taken in by this BS.
Get well soon
@@frosted1030 How about this paradox: blood, veins(any of the tubes forming part of the blood circulation system of the body) and a heart(something that pumps the blood around) must have come around at exactly the same time. there is no way for it to gradually evolve. Better still, the blood MUST come with platelets from the beginning otherwise the organism would die the first time it got the tiniest scratch. again no time for it to gradually evolve. The DNA can't just randomly get thousands of new nucleotides overnight.
"removing the idea of god, from the equation of life". Evolution did no such thing, it didn't need to remove god, because god never made it into the picture; god was completely and utterly superfluous.
God, the father of Christ has been there from the beginning, unlike your god Charles Darwin.
@@RedDotInABlueState91 Well no. God is simply an invention, zero proof for any kind of god. And Darwin is no god, not by any stretch. He's simply a scientist that came up with a revolutionary idea that turned out to be true.
Even if evolution was shown to be wrong, it doesn't mean the bible is right.
You might not believe in Jesus as your Lord and Savior, or even believe that God exists, but it takes only a tiny fraction of the critical thinking you’ve used to prove to yourself that God doesn’t exist to disprove the big bang theory, abiogenesis, and the theory of evolution.
Explain to me how you can disprove the big bang and evolution with a tiny fraction of thinking
@@beandog4036 Describe to me the causation for the singularity, where the space came from for the "bang" to happen, and the causation of the "bang" itself. What was the exact process used for and chemical makeup of the first organism to form on the earth through abiogenesis? What are the exact mutations and how much time did it take to go from that first organism to arrive at modern day homo sapiens? I'll expect exact answers to all of those within five minutes of this message being published.
@@Inmate533It's exactly the same line of reasoning we use for nonbelief in God that we use to counter those points, ironically. The reasoning goes like this - It is illogical to believe anything for which there is no evidence, it is instead logical to accept that there are some things we don't know yet.
@@alextowers3564 Unfortunately for all of the theories mentioned, the critical bits are the parts that are missing, while the fantasy parts are used to try to disprove God’s creation. For example, background radiation would only be possible if an explosion happened inside of space that already existed, which parallels God’s account of creation, but fails when trying to explain the big bang theory due to the lack of explanation of the already existing space. Every critical step that these theories need to take in order to be plausible sees them fail due to, “we don’t know”.
@@Inmate533 I think you've got it a bit backwards. Science is about finding out what *is* true, not proving that god *isn't.* You can't start with the question of god and then find evidence to disprove him, that's not how that works.
And yes, you might possibly be correct with your statement that the universe would have to exist before the big bang. That's why scientists don't claim the big bang is the origin story of the universe. People like Calvin like to tell their followers that this is what scientists, and the evil atheists think, but in reality that's just a strawman.
Also, for all the theories you mentioned, they don't actually rely on the holes you think you've found to be demonstrably valid. We don't need to know the exact chemical makeup of the earliest lifeforms to know that abiogenesis is true, for example.
Amen AIG 🙏 God bless
Great video thankyou. This is why Im willing to stand out as a freak in many Christian circles. Evolution does not fit Jesus teachings and purpose (narrative). Its all or nothing
Guess it’s nothing then
Being antisocial is seriously a tricky thing to some extent. I need to maintain distance from others generally, I have to get to lifespring in five days I think. I would say in relation to the fact that the Bible must be trusted, I have to affirm that the world is 6,000-10,000 years old, but have heard some kind of argument indicating the days could have somehow been eon like in length I think I don’t think that makes sense to entertain specifically in regard to English translations of the Bible as we see them generally but am curious to some extent, focusing on the age of the earth is okay to do I just think there’s a lot more rational things to do in relation to the Christian faith. We need to literally end abortion, homosexuality, gender confusion, and pornography, we need to convert all of God’s elect, we need to convert the Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists, we need to get the Catholic business to reform sufficiently so that they do not seem like enemies to everyone, they need to adopt, practice, and use a Westminster confession of faith for starters.
Arrius Calpurnius Piso and allies post 70AD defeat of Jerusalem.
I laugh at how it is believed that time/space, matter and energy came from nothing. Then scientists try to redefine what nothing is.
Where did god come from?
@@beandog4036if nothing existed then something had to create everything. Christians believe this was God. Nothing created God.
@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 it's not evolution but it does fall upon the atheistic worldview which leads to evolution
It didn’t come from nothing, it came from everything.
You don’t understand the concept if that’s what you believe.
@@RealHooksy Everything always existed and just needed to be expanded? was there a start of the universe or was the universe always eternal?
Well explain, Answers...... truly a gem of a video.
Jesus be good, and He be gaining ground everyday. Atheism simply can't stand The Wisdom of Christ our God.
Actually, religion is losing ground every day....as it should. Ancient fairy tales should have no place in a modern future.
Amen! Amen! Amen! I used to be a creationist evolutionist but then I became a Christian!
evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community as a well-supported and well-documented theory that explains the diversity of life on Earth. It is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy.
😂
@@larrybedouin2921 😂😂
Born and raised in a good Christian home. Darwin never equated to logic in my mind. And even as a youngster going through school I knew what answers I was supposed to put on my tests, so I did. But I never believed anything other then that we were created in the image of God. ✝️
And that God was created by humans in the image of humans.
As a former atheist, I commend you for sticking to the Way. You were right indeed
@@HS-zk5nnyou used to be an atheist.......so you used to not believe in 3000 or more gods, now you believe in every God ever invented?
How did you come to this conclusion?
@@bpljlb no, that is a wrong conclusion that you have reached.
@@HS-zk5nn no, by definition I am right...
You THINK you are right by what THINK atheist means....
Do some research and don't rely on others for your information
Thank you.
As Answers in Genesis takes the bible as being the Literal Truth then you must also believe that Slavery is OK
(Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)
I won't mention the parts about Rape, and Murder is also Ok with God
hektapascal, please mention them.
Your arguments won't stand.
It’s thou shalt not murder. To say thou shalt not murder like modern translations state then God contradicts himself. Nothing can be further from the truth. I wish Christians would be more conscious when they make this statement. Aside from this sticking point, which has launched more debates I have been a apart of than any other topic, this is an excellent video.
What a great video. I’ve thought this for quite some time now.
That's pretty sad
@@--..-...-..-.--.... why sad buddy?
Thanks for sharing this wonderful video. I was watching a video awhile back about an evolutionary scientist who had discovered a skeleton which he claimed proved that this land creature had evolved into a whale. Many evolution promoting scientists were so excited! One person who came to see this evolutionary marvel, noticed that the discoverer only had found the front half of a skeleton, and had fabricated the rear half. The skeleton had no fluke, so the man asked the discoverer since you only have half of a skeleton, how do you know this creature was evolving into a whale? The discoverer said, "well I speculated." Is that what science is going to? Speculation?!! Similar to the Scopes Monkey Trial... the tooth of a supposedly ape-man, turned out to be the tooth of a wild pig!!
Such a shame to base your life on fairytales.
I'm glad the logical side of me saw through the deeply flawed faith system that I was raised in.
As long as you cling to a unfounded human made religious belief (every known religion), it will enforce divisions and hate upon the "others" that are not your group. There is no god. Even if there was, he would not deserve our respect. An all powerful being that allows the stupendous amount of suffering that takes place every day, for most of our existance is by no means "good" or moral.
4:27 Nice! This is an evolution poster from the '70s American satire magazine, National Lampoon. The full image shows Bonobos evolving from black people, Poles evolving from great apes (and being genetically ancestral to toasters), and the French evolving from Baboons.
While the last one is fairly accurate, I'm still astonished that AiG used this as a representation of what Evolutionary Biologists believe. Are they just lazy, or are they intentionally trying to tell you lies? Hmm....
01:30 why is it like this now? Because there's been an increase in wickedness in society.
Matthew 23:12,13 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
Jesus is describing to the disciples the harsh reality that awaits them after He leaves (John 16:5-7) and before the end of the age when He returns (Revelation 19:11-15). He has said that they will be hated for their association with Him, that they will be persecuted and killed (Matthew 24:9). Many who seem to follow Jesus will fall away due to that pressure and some will even betray the others. False prophets will rise to teach error and lead many people away from the truth of Jesus (Matthew 24:10-11).
Now Jesus adds that one result of this false teaching will be disorder: a rejection of standards of goodness and morality. Those who follow the distorted vision offered by false prophets will abandon truth. They will rebel against virtue or submitting to God. The ultimate result of that self-serving, self-following lawlessness will be the loss of love. The imagery of love becoming "cold" evokes a corpse: not merely unmoving, but dead and lifeless. As humanity falls further away from the teachings of Christ, it will become less loving.
@@rf7477Putin is a Christian? Is he now? I'm sure you probably think Adolf was one too. So ill informed you are.
I was in matric when an English teacher tried telling us about evolution by using the life cycle of a frog. Kids those days spoke to their parents, who confronted the school and almost got the teacher fired for trying to teach heresy…..this was 1977
Here, you dropped this: 🧠
Ephesians 6:17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.
Exactly what person can you talk with on video TODAY has actually been "saved" from death AND is at least six hundred years old? Can you find one or is this saying things because you think it makes you look good?
Nah
@@betsieswartz So you can't find a single person that has been "saved"?
@@frosted1030 no I cannot.
@@betsieswartz "no I cannot." With absolutely no examples to show, you still beLIEve in this trash. Give an example of something you totally beLIEve in, using the exact same methodology. Zero examples and a single well outdated source (by thousands of years) that although translated through three different languages with dozens of different interperatations must be absolutely true? Specifically, cite an example. If you have none, explain why special pleading fallacy convinced you to stop critically thinking.
Interesting enough. Came from a buddhism background and had heard enough that people were coming from worms which is dust. I can't trade with anything that the calling of God, the Creator of man.
"IF You are without GOD, You are without HOPE!!!
You’re also without hope if you reject modern science
Evolution is "meaner" than anything I have ever thought or said.
Jesus said that wickedness would increase in the world before he returns.
@@rf7477 Why do you lie about the Word of God?
@@rf7477we read it every day. Maybe you don't know. Maybe you should pick up a Bible and find out.
@@rf7477the NT is full of truth, actually and the "contradictions" can be easily refuted. Bible scholars help us out with you guys. You guys think you're smart but you guys aren't as clever as you think you are.
What wickedness is increasing?
@@tone9358 What wickedness is increasing? back in the 50s teachers' main complaints with students were talking out of turn cutting in line and chewing bubblegum now it's drugs r@PE and murder. Yes, the world is getting worse in these times we live in.
I Do not Care what a Mer human thinks because all you hear is ( we think, it is possible, it may have , it is could have and more!) I as a creature made by God The Creator formed me and placed me in the womb of my mother I will Stand!
Because my Mother Was told by a Doctor she couldn't have a Child but She Grounded in Her Faithful Prayer's Prayed and Prayed she was lead to Adopt and did then found out 9 months later I Was to Be Praised God For The Blessing now She Was Blessed with Two Boys! So I Will Forever Stand With THE HOLY WORD OF GOD AND MY SAVIOR JESUS!
Anything that takes away from God is dangerous. Anything that takes us away from his word is dangerous. Evolution would be no different.
The main purpose of the Christian life is to become more like Christ every day. When we fill our hearts up with worldly things, it hinders God's work in our lives. We should always be seeking to draw closer to God and holding to things like evolution will not do it.
Psalm 17:15 As for me, I will see Your face in righteousness; I shall be satisfied when I awake in Your likeness.
God bless AIG and all the creationist channels. The Lord bless and protect you 🙏
Evolution is the truth. So your God hates the truth
@@globalcoupledancesJesus is the truth. There is no other truth besides that and anything that proclaims to be the truth apart from the bible is a lie from Satan.
@@globalcoupledances Whether it's knowing the truth or speaking the truth, both are found in a growing relationship with God. When we spend time in God's Word and in prayer, the truth is revealed to us.
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. John 14:6
@@newcreationinchrist1423 I think Jesus was created by the apostles in an attempt to rule the world. That is why His remains had never been found. O.t.o.h. the remains of Santa Claus had been found
@@globalcoupledancesyou're coming to the wrong person trying to convince me of that. Lol
Doesn't fly me, I'm afraid.
Great video!
I’m struggling to find the great.
@@betsieswartz Don't worry. That'sjust because you are an evolutionist.
@@ritatoczek4037 no, it’s because I know facts. You cannot seriously go around arguing against people who have spent their life’s work proving you wrong. Also, why do none of the creationists in this comment section know how to use spaces?
@@betsieswartz Ohyesidontknowhowtousespaces.couldntpossiblybeatypo.thankyouforpointingouthowdumbiam.icannowgoonliving.
Good points and length and not condescending.
It’s condescending to people who can think past the teachings of an old book.
@@RealHooksy not to those who seek the truth whether new or old.
@@carolynnr.6409 hide from reality mayb
Ok it’s 2023 you people should not vote or become doctors at this point seriously I am sick of it
Great video thank you,
At the end of God creating, the Bible states that "God saw that it was good"; and at the 6th day when He had finished He saw that it was very Good. If something created is found to be Good by its Creator(in this case God), and even Very Good, then why would it need changed or evolve? It doesn't need to nor has creation evolved. Adaptation, Yes, Evolution, never.
I prayed for this knowledge at a time when I was trying my best to explain it to my Christian brothers at work when I found out they believe in both Creation and evolution as the path of life. Thank God His Word if Flawless and came to my aid for their sakes, not mine.
This was a phenomenally artistic way to say "Evolution can't be right because it conflicts with the bible!"
Evolution can't be right because it is junk science!
👏🏻
I definitely believe in adaptation, even long term adaptation. And the ideas of evolution do make sense on the time scale it models itself with but there’s way too many big questions that cannot even be imagined. There is a creator, and his designs are beyond our comprehension. He is a logical god.
Logical God? Explain and give an example, please. Thank you. (PS, I don't want an argument. Just an explanation and an example.)
@@grantsmythe8625 well, god made nature, it was good. God is everything that represents order and productivity. Anything that goes against our natural order is sinful and counterproductive. If it is reasonable and makes sense it’s holy, only angels and demons and everything spiritual can act supernaturally like possessions, magic, curses as demons do but also walk on water, heal, resurrect and turn water into wine. These may not be logical to us because we are not pure spiritual beings
@@LordMathious sounds like you have questions for me, I suggest getting a Bible friend
@@LordMathious I’m not going to spend too much time but I’ll give you this, what was that infinitely small but infinitely dense core that was the universe before the Big Bang? What gave matter the intelligence to design itself into cells? Who crafted the eyeballs that still haven’t been properly explained evolutionary? And finally what is even the point to love, nurture, be neighborly and to treat every man as equals from a Darwinian perspective, if all of us are just differently evolved primates then we all have inherently different values and death is actually a good thing that drives natural selection. God is the only logical reason for any of these, makes a lot more sense then pure chance and coincidence
01:00 apart from God there is nothing but darkness
The first sin committed by the first man was to reject God's Word.
L
Amen 🙏
YAHWEH the heavenly Father loves you❤ follow the truth that leads to life everlasting, HIS WORD
The origin of life through means of evolution is based upon the starting premise that there is no God. It is an attempt to explain the origin of man with atheism as the interpretive framework of all evidence. There is no reason for Christians to adopt the evolutionary model when we believe that God exists and that He told us how He created the world. The universe was created through miraculous action, and so there is no reason to entertain an explanation that assumes no miracles.
Evolution doesn’t describe the origins of life, it explains how live got from before to now.
It is an attempt to explain life as it exists today. Colloquially, it is accurate to say it is an explanation for the existence of life in that context. Technically speaking, no evolution does not explain life life, as in the very first self-replicating organism. Which is a pretty big problem for atheists. As ridiculous a story as increased complexity through random mutation and selective death is, at least there is some proposed mechanism. But what is the mechanism for life from non-life?
@@StageWatcher what is the mechanism for a good from no god?
a god existing isn't totally ruled out by evolution, we don't know what created physics and chemistry which could be designed, but it does disprove christianity
@@Ballondorwinner Evolution does not work without God. God, however, does not need evolution, and evolution appears to be inconsistent with the way God tells us He did things.
Your content is always spot on, easily digestible and very well presented. Thank you very much. Please forgive me, your choice of music is, at best, irritating if not overwhelming (IMO). I have to force myself to lipread in order to concentrate on your message. Ethereal, and way too loud, it dominates and obfuscates the presentation. My apologies. I will continue to view...
So sad to see christian theologians bow to evolution. Genesis 1:1 is one of my favorite verses.
Wolves in sheep’s clothing destroying the flock from within….
This video should be called: science says you’re not a sinner worthy of death, but we say you are!
W O W ! ❤
How can people think they weren't created? How can people think the world wasn't created? It's physically here. Lol You can see it.
That’s just circular reasoning, which is a fallacy.
The Theory of Evolution is Evil.
It denies Jesus the Glory He deserves.
It denies God the Glory He deserves.
Ideas have consequences. The Nazis took Darwin's Model so seriously, they killed all Jews and Black people for being subhuman (or so they thought.)
Darwin's Model showed apes slowly stand upright and become more Caucasian as they evolved. So, they thought black people were closer to being apes than human. But, The Holy Bible teaches us that humanity came from one man and one woman who were perfect and reproduced. Their DNA contained the information to create all skin colors, eye colors, hair colors, height, weight, and shapes you see today. White people and black people share the same ancestor.
@@johnwebb4499
Not necessarily. When you look at the original Hebrew language that genesis was written in, there is no indication of a strict 6 day creation or anything disproving that evolution occurred. God likely just guided evolution. That doesn’t take God out of anything. If evolution did happen and God guided it, then that’s still a magnificent thing worthy of praise.
@@ResistTheGreatReplacementEU Nope. The first chapter, Genesis says God created Everything in 6 Earth days. On the 7th day He rested. God's favorite number is 7. The English (KJ) Bible is written in code. The Hebrews Bible is written in code with geometric codes. God's book is Perfect.
NOTHING EVOLVED. GOD CREATED ALL KINDS OF EVERY CREATURE IN THOSE 1ST SIX DAYS. Many scientists believe in Creation, but they don't admit it. They are expected to tow the company line. If they were proven wrong they'd be out of a job.
Christians should never validate anything from the theory of evolution.
Only go according to what The Bible says.
This means the Universe is 6,000-7,000 yrs old. If any species did evolve, it was cuz God foresaw it and allowed it. Also, the great flood happened. Killing the dragons/dinosaurs. Life had to start from One Male One Female all over again. To get it right. 75% of The Bible is Prophecy. History rhymes
I keep hearing people say thou shalt not kill but the commandment is thou shalt not murder / commit murder. The Bible clearly states that there is a time/ season to kill.
Yes! We used it to kill Natives, Jews and Blacks
Murder is definitionally bad. It's defined as "unwarranted killing". So God said "Killing for a bad reason is bad". Only the most profound messages from the universe's most powerful being 🙏
Yep, I’m sticking with Genesis with this one.
Two opposing ideas can not both be true and make sense. Something will be corrupted along the way between the two of them.
I also, I think Darwin Evolution is another version of subjective understanding in the end. It sounds plausible, like most subjective ideas, but it always misses “The Why did it happen this way,” question. If it’s so random, then we should not be able to “observe” it.
If it’s not random, then it also suggest that a creator planned it to work a specific way.
Keep up the good work, A.I.G.
There's something strange about this kind of video. We don't decide whether to accept any other scientific theories based on the consequenses of doing so. Why should that be a determining factor in whether to accept evolution or not?
Because these theories deal with human morality and behavior which affects all society for better or worse. It's just important to study worldview to see what is best for humankind.
@@HamnimationStudios Sure, we should study world views and how they affect humankind, but whether or not we accept a scientific theory should be based on examining the evidence and not if we like it or not. Do you really disagree with that?
@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 You raise an important question. Nevertheless, differing conclusions still often result from the same material, leading to some making inferences that have effects outside of the main body of science. We don't disagree with examination of evidence; we just notice that impartial facts often create opinions. Good points, though!
@@HamnimationStudios I don't disagree with that. We approach evidence differently and differ on what constitutes valid evidence. No doubt that has an effect on our conclusions. That's all fine, as long as we can examine the evidence without being too distracted by our world views and accept that what we want to be true and what is doesn't have to match.
@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 Yep, great talking with you!
Hello ,I am an atheist but I think of myself as a moral person . Evolution has made me the observant and conscious man that can question the difference between good and evil. And like 99% of humanity I embrace goodness. God didn't inform my moral stance. Be good to your fellow humans and every living thing on earth. Thanks.
Maybe what you think is good isn’t actually good. Ever thought about that?
Then are you the standard of right and wrong that we should strive to be and be more like you? I'm not saying this sarcastically lol but just asking you to ponder the question.
@@ResistTheGreatReplacementEUthe same could be said for you. Even people in their own religions interpret their text differently especially christianity which causes them to have different morals, some directly contradictory. Whos to say whos right in that situation. Goodness is perceptual
An atheist can adopt a morality, but cannot justify it. What moral standard are you appealing to in order to determine what is right or wrong?
@@LordMathious
"Just like that"?
I wonder how you account for our amazingly complex brains?
Also, how do you account for the range of different concepts of goodness among the international atheist community?
Science is all about process and religion is about value.
Science is all about how and religion is all about why.
Science and GOD can correlate but when a process is more pioritised than the value then atheist have no hope.
@@LordMathious becauss science is all about the process. Religion is literally what nurture society and kingdoms. Proper kindoms bore smart people and smart people study the process of the reality. Religion, why, value and intention is more important to learn than the process because its what nurtures humanity.
Tell me is loving yourself and others faith or science. You have to keep in mind there is no evidence that we should love ourselves and others.
Three words: Appeal To Consequences.
Many years I admired William lane craig, how enthusiast he is with the gospel.
His believe in Bigbang/Evolution theory did I ignore, however the last vew years I start to doubt is this man reborn, is he saved ?
Average people will of course answer , it's up to God, but what is our opinion
Is a DVD of this available for purchase?
answersingenesis.org/store/media/
Save your money , or just throw it away.
@@answersingenesisstop spreading misinformation
@@betsieswartzStop making false claims
@@RedDotInABlueState91 yes because 99% of people who have dedicated their lives are wrong and a random book full of fairy tales is right. I’m not making false claims, I’m trying to stop misinformation. Not for people like you, you’re already too far gone, especially judging by your name. I’m letting people who are on the fence how ridiculous creation is. I’m also telling the channel to stop attempting to corrupt people’s minds, especially when they are to ignoring any evidence that contradicts their claims, and only looking for what benefits what they want to believe. No claims I’ve made are false, not like you’d know. I already touched on this, but that name is possibly the worst thing I’ve seen in this thread, and that’s saying a lot when it’s mostly people believing in creation. But the point is, if you want to see false claims, just watch the video.
Why are you posting a video for a blog that you guys wrote back in NOV 29 2021?
Don't cosmologists know that when you change the parameters to measure the speed of light that you also change the speed of light? Distance is expanded and time speeds up where there is no matter in our line of sight between galaxies. The fact that we can see or detect light from distant galaxies means that those distant galaxies are actually closer to us than our own Sagittarius A. black hole in the center of our galaxy because we can see redshifted light from galaxies and we CANNOT see the light from within a black hole since the light in a black hole is redshifted out of range of our detection. The light from distant galaxies are redshifted because the galaxies that we are seeing are more massive than ours and the light that we are seeing is from deep within the centers of those massive galaxies. So the light we are seeing is deeply redshifted as it leaves the distant galaxies and only slightly blue-shifted coming into our less massive galaxy where we are not even in the center of our smaller galaxy. So the universe is not expanding into oblivion for no reason. Dark energy is associated with black holes that are absorbing frames of reference of time and space. They are NOT "inflating" for no reason. They are increasing in size from absorbing space time regardless of the amount of matter they absorb. So there are no inflatons and no dark matter particles and superluminal motion is NOT seven times the speed of light. You can't project our measures of time and distance onto the rest of the universe. Please make a note of it ...and the light from distant galaxies is arriving much faster than you realize.
I'm not an expert, but this kinda makes sense. When it comes to starlight in space you either have to assume light has a fixed speed or that it fluctuates depending on where in the universe it is. Evolution has to assume it's a fixed speed, otherwise the whole age of the universe will come into question again.
Disagree. How can you increase the speed of light in a vacuum, that throws Einstein's equations right out the window 😂 and everything we've observed about space time confirms Einstein's maths. The laws of physics don't just go out the window because light happens to be traveling between galaxies. Also, your argument assumes all galaxies are red shifted, they aren't. Andromeda is the closest galaxy to us and it's heavily blue shifted because it's moving towards us. Also, what's your evidence for black holes expanding by absorption of space time? Singularitys infinitely compress spacetime in a localised region inside the event horizon, but we've never seen evidence of it affecting spacetime outside the event horizon so no idea where you pulled that rabbit out of. Your argument also says that other galaxys are closer than Sagittarius A, which is our supermassive black hole, inside our galaxy which by extension means all other galaxys are inside ours?! God is infinitely wise, there are answers to the distance and visibility problem if you're a young earth creationist but I honestly don't know what the solution is, but I'm not going to throw physics out the window because I don't have an answer yet.
I might sound like an big idiot but what is the conclusion and who is it related to the video
Einstein doesnt determine the laws of physics. God does. Einstein did his best to observe them. We absolutely can throw his discoveries out, and ought to be open to the idea of doing so. 'Science' is constantly changing. God is not.
Time speeds up asymptotically to a maximum when going away from a massive object like a galaxy.
The speed-up going from interstellar space within our galaxy to far away from any galaxy is tiny. Less than two seconds per day with the below assumptions:
Assuming all the mass of the galaxy is within a 26,000 light year radius sphere (Earth's distance from the galaxy centre), I calculate that the time runs 0.999982 times as fast as in intergalactic space at Earth's distance from the centre:
√(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×26000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.999982
When a clock in intergalactic space has ticked one second, a clock at Earth's distance from the galaxy centre has completed 0.999982 seconds.
Equation under heading:
Outside a non-rotating sphere
In the Wikipedia article 'Gravitational time dilation'
The above calculation assumes intergalactic space is infinitely far away from any source of gravity. If we instead go a million light years away from our galaxy centre, the time there runs 0.9999995 as fast as at infinite distance.
√(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×1000000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.9999995.
If we go a billion light years away the time there runs 0.9999999995 as fast as at infinite distance
√(1−2×6.674E−11×6×10^42÷(299792458^2×1000000000×9.46×10^15)) = 0.9999999995
💝🙏🙏💝💝🙏🙏💝💝🙏🙏💝
Faith in God and Science do not at all conflict. However, certain types of faith in God do conflict with certain types of views about Science.
Evolution is fact
False