5:12 You're contradicting yourself here. The whole idea of this line of reasoning is that religion is evolutionarily adaptive. It's an evolved phenomenon. Which means it in some way corresponds to facts. So, in this sort of analytical framework, you must conclude that these ethical axioms are - if not entirely explicable - at least theoretically reasonable.
Religions work as a framework for survival in very particular and specific sets of circumstances, Amazonian tirbes fast during the reproductive season of the native fish. Similarly, abrahamic tribes saw the value of big, stable families and herda as the dessert and nature were dangerous and they depended on storms to sustain crops, the herd and more children meant, more of then could survive unto aldulthood. However when you apply such framework to the entierty of the world (as cristinanity is just ancient abrahamic doctrine with the potential for reddemption) it doesn't work as well.
Starting off with the assumption that all religions are human formed ideas assumes you can provide evidence that religion is completely formed by humans. You can't do this. Start somewhere else.
Where did they form then. Please tell me where they came from. And don't say a burning bush or an angel came down neither you or I can prove anything. We only feel what we believe and neither you or I know what a GOD is feeling or thinking. To think anyone knows that or to think YOU or a preist or pope knows is fucking funny. No nobody knows what an omnipotent being is thinking of doing or wants to do.
Starting off elsewhere assumes non humans formed religion which should not be a starting point unless you can prove it is a equally valid argument towards the opposite we as humans haven't proven any similar intelligence and religious beliefs in any other creatures
Putting lol footage under "bad software" 💯💯
5:12 You're contradicting yourself here. The whole idea of this line of reasoning is that religion is evolutionarily adaptive. It's an evolved phenomenon. Which means it in some way corresponds to facts. So, in this sort of analytical framework, you must conclude that these ethical axioms are - if not entirely explicable - at least theoretically reasonable.
2:20 why religion then? Social cohesion and conduct repression are their collective benefits.
Religions work as a framework for survival in very particular and specific sets of circumstances, Amazonian tirbes fast during the reproductive season of the native fish. Similarly, abrahamic tribes saw the value of big, stable families and herda as the dessert and nature were dangerous and they depended on storms to sustain crops, the herd and more children meant, more of then could survive unto aldulthood.
However when you apply such framework to the entierty of the world (as cristinanity is just ancient abrahamic doctrine with the potential for reddemption) it doesn't work as well.
This video was beautiful and thought provoking.
Christianity serves to make us healthy and loving under the lord's great warmth.
How is culture dependent on religion if most art, especially nowadays, is not related to religion?
Starting off with the assumption that all religions are human formed ideas assumes you can provide evidence that religion is completely formed by humans.
You can't do this. Start somewhere else.
Where did they form then. Please tell me where they came from. And don't say a burning bush or an angel came down neither you or I can prove anything. We only feel what we believe and neither you or I know what a GOD is feeling or thinking. To think anyone knows that or to think YOU or a preist or pope knows is fucking funny. No nobody knows what an omnipotent being is thinking of doing or wants to do.
Is there reason to believe they're not human-formed ideas?
I can say this about any type of idea or belief.
Where should we be starting off then?
@@ethanmiller5487 where did it start then? Bc it was no bush or angel.
Starting off elsewhere assumes non humans formed religion which should not be a starting point unless you can prove it
is a equally valid argument towards the opposite we as humans haven't proven any similar intelligence and religious beliefs in any other creatures
aww chud running this channel coping so hard rn
Saying someone else is coping without providing an argument why is the ultimate cope.