Well, the Jurassic Park plot hole was sort of addressed in the first film when they said the gaps in dinosaur DNA were filled in with tree frog DNA, hence it looking more reptilian-like.
This. Its utterly amazing how many people think that Ingen didnt know they were creating new life when it's spelled out literally in a PowerPoint right after they get to the park. The book spells it out even clearer and if you cared enough to read the comics you would never make the argument in the first place.
Crichton even wrote about feathers in JP The Lost World book - but he decided to write it up so that the young Tyrannosaurs had feathers and apparently shed them as they grew older.
As puntuacted by the recent Terminator videogame in wich you can see the Terminators sent back in time at the same time the final battle between Skynet and the Resistance is happening by the endgame.
I like how most of the comments are correcting half of the "fixed plot holes" and i love how the list uses dark fate as a plot hole fix when dark fate is about 80% plot holes XD
Do more research before making these videos. The first terminator movie clearly states that Skynet was not able to send back more, that it was a final "hail Mary" play to try to win. For a channel that is apparently big on the details, you missed that one like a bunch of amateurs.
Yet, somehow Skynet managed to send T1000 to kill John, and resistance managed to capture, reprogram and send back T-800. Yup, that time machine was destroyed, we are sure about that.
@jason lewis terminator:resistance mentioned in the ending that 3 terminators travelled back in time at once in different points of time, one of which was t-1000 sent to kill john connor
@@saugattamang9739 Yeah but the plot in a video game does not make it canon. Cameron's original draft of the T2 script included how the T800 and T1000 were sent back. After Kyle was sent back they found another room, I believe it was sealed with ice. When they went through the new door they found where the T1000 was sent back. At this exact time they reprogrammed a T800 and sent back as well. So I know it didn't make it to film, but Cameron's original vision had everyone sent back on that same night.
In the cartoon Aladdin, I thought he had to say “I wish” for it to be official. When Aladdin was in the water, genie took his head bobbing in the water as a nod “yes” for the wish. That’s how he got the free wish out of the cave of wonders. He didn’t say “I wish”, he just bet the genie he couldn’t go it. Not a wish. Yes, I think about Disney movies too much
They did define it. It's rub the lamp and say I wish and it's the same word for word on the new movie. They just didn't research this video at all it's not the only thing they got wrong tbf
yeah, this was easily explained in the cartoon. aside from having to spell it out for people, the lines of dialogue show he didn't make a wish to get out of the cave of wonders, made a wish to be a prince, made a wish to not drown (genie literally says "I'll take that as a yes" when aladdin's head nods), then makes a wish to set the genie free. its not complicated. I knew this when I was 10
How did he make a wish not to drown? He was unconscious. Due to gravity, Aladdin's head fell down in the same way a nod would happen. The genie saw this and took it as a yes but that doesn't change the fact that Aladdin never made the wish
@@SomeRandomJackAss and presumably they could have used the space stone to restore the rainbow bridge since Odin has it at the end of the film. And in the next movie the bridge is back. Makes since because it's whole thing is about space teleportation Though that part is just a fantheory of mine.
yea everyone keeps screaming "Plot Hole" when its literally explained in the film!! its like people just look for issues for the sake of looking for issues!
Kyle Reese says that they had smashed skynets defense grid and had won, makes sense that only one would be sent back due to things falling apart around them, dark fate having a second to kill John was just a stupid decision to shock and "raise the stakes" and to make the new lead more important
@@ranwolf1240 idiot they sent more than one terminator to different timelines just before there defense grid got smashed they sent more than one terminatos the t-800 to kill Sarah Connor before John was born and the other a t-1000 to kill John Connor .
@@darklordmordred if they have played terminator resistance they would have understand how that skynet didn't just send one terminator I sent 3 terminator to 3 different timelines and the resistance did the same they sent Kyle Reese to stop the t-800 , a reprogrammed t-800 to stop the t-1000 and the other protector was unknown.
I love that everything past the second movie got thrown out. They were shit movies full of holes and bad writing. Turned it into a respectable trilogy for Sarah conner.
Skynet not sending more Terminators was never a plot hole. They explain things in the first Terminator. First of all, sending the Terminator back was a last ditch effort by Skynet after it was defeated. Second, pre-war records were destroyed so Skynet had very little information about Sarah and John Connor. That's why the Terminator in T1 was going around killing every Sarah Connor it could find.
Alien: Covenant actually screwed up more than it "fixed" according to the other films the xenomorphs existed many hundreds (possibly thousands) of years before humans discovered space travel.
Avp is still a canon film as it deals with the first weyland. But in alien it is noted that the engineer ship with an engineer was hundreds of years old but first off david apparently wiped out the engineers about 70 years before the first film and created the xenomorphs after the destruction of the engineers. Without including avp even Scott's alien films dont make sense
@@lilapostropheproductions You telling me you didn't need to know the exact origin of Han Solo's blaster and name that no one ever thought meant anything anyway?
Of course Alien/Aliens didn’t need a backstory. But we didn’t _need_ Alien/Aliens either. The value of a thing is in the thing itself. You can criticise Prometheus and Covenant for being bad films, but whether they are necessary or not is irrelevant.
The exhaust port of the Darth Star is NOT a plot hole. It was never a plot hole. The whole point of the Rebels getting the blueprints was to find some kind of tactical advantage to exploit. If YOU think it was a plot whole, then you'd should never watch any kind of heist or spy movie. NEVER!!
I never thought of as a plot hole more of Empire being arrogant that they don't consider plans important to worry about they could easily run tests of the station to see if there are anything rebels could use against them but choose not to.
It wasn't a plot hole. The Empire just thought it was a tricky enough shot that only a Force user who was also a great pilot could pull it off. They didn't know of Luke's existence so as far as they knew only Vader could have done it and he was on their side.
07:14 „A big, scary robot goes back in time to kill a woman before she can *father* the leader of humanity‘s future resistance.“ You sure that you didn‘t mean „give birth to“? I swear you guys are just doing this to get more comments, and I‘m falling for it.
theres a damn baby in the opening of halloween 1978 its laurie strode,judith myers is the slut baby sitter he kills and the baby is in the crib in the house just fine
rick weller yeah well I’m telling you what the movie said, the baby could be in the foster care system and is living In Italy for all I care, the movies says they aren’t siblings they retconned it
The terminator plot hole wasn't a plot hole . It was explained that skynet sent back 2 terminators then the resistance took control of the time machine sending back a reprogrammed third terminator to protect John meaning skynet no longer had means of sending anything back pretty much making every movie past t2 a plot hole which is why it should h ave ended with t2 . Now dark fate doesn't solve a single plot hole instead it really makes the entire series of movies a worthless plot hole . John sent his father back and skynet sent the terminator that ultimately ends up getting used to create skynet . If John dies summer doesn't send back a terminator meaning skynet isn't made meaning no plans to be used to make legion since legion was made from plans of an abandoned skynet and if there was plans for skynet why build legion . Not to mention Carl if he was a skynet terminator should have phased out of existence the same time skynet was defeated meaning he would really have to be a legion terminator and if that is the case why would it matter to legion if John lives or dies since John isn't the one destined to lead the resistance against legion . And there is the whole John himself should have phased out of existence at the end of t2 . Yeah dark fate solves nothing in fact it is basically plot hole the movie .
if you think about it, John being alive pretty much guarantees the war will happen. After all if John is dead there would be no reason to send a T-800 to kill John or Sarah(John doesn't exist and Sarah is a nobody) If there's no T-800, there's no reason to send Reese back in time. If Reese isn't sent back, he can't get Sarah pregnant. It's basically a time loop as long as John exist
magicrainbow aids. Great. Please don’t point that out. 🤫 Because now they will have to make yet another bad Terminator movie to explain it all over again.
That's why Genysis was so good. It actually did solve the plot holes created by T3 and Salvation. Everything after T2 is an alternate timeline the Skynet that turns John into a Terminator in Genisys is from a timeilne where it wins and starts moving laterally in time.
No that's why it should have ended with t2 then the plot holes of t3 would never have happened . Plus it was planned that t2 would be the end greedy execs forced a change to the end to leave room for t3 . If you like the later movies good they did there job they entertained you . That doesn't change the fact everything past 2 is a plot hole and dark fate is the worst being a movie of nothing but plot holes.
5:10 that was literally answered seconds away in that same scene, Loki states that Odin must have summoned a great large of dark Magic to send Thor. I sometimes wonder how nerd are you really
Yeah I didn't understand it, especially since the timeline has become convuluted and confusing by the time Dark Fate came out. Shouldn't the destruction of both T800s and evidence on T2 prevent the existence of Skynet or or the delivery of Terminators into the past? And how does the Terminator from Dark Fate know the whereabouts of Rev-9 if it's a whole different AI/creator?
I just saw it as time travel requiring some vast resource just to send a single entity, so it was illogical to try sending more when one should be enough. Especially if said resource made sending more than one at a time impossible.
Ok...the Terminator “plot hole” is anything but, and was technically addressed in both the original AND salvation (and even Genesis!)...the original terminator was sent back as a last gambit by Skynet shortly before its defeat by Connor’s rebels, with Kyle following in the wake of their victory. There was no chance to send back a second at that point Then in Salvation, they showed how the mechanisms to activate and place the terminator were actually quite slow, so if one was activated to send back it would be a drawn out process Then Genysis actually shows how Connor’s army appeared to have won the war before Reece travelled back. Yes, each of these would technically be a different timeline, but there’s not really a plot hole...Skynet just never had the chance
@@ranwolf1240 Because of the way Sarah and Reese stopped the Terminator inthe first movie that altered the Time Line somewhat, effectively changing it so Skynet had enough time to send the T-1000 back.
Okay, had to think a lot to come up with a proper explanation. First up let's set a base for the events of the original Terminator movie. It's for once a selffullfilling prophecy, in that sense that Skynet is only defeated because John Conner exists, but John Conner only exists because Skynet sent a Terminator to kill his mother and he did send his father to protect her. Also the Skynet in the future of the first movie exists because of the remains of the t-800 in the past as we learn in the second movie. Now we assume that you have a timeline which looks like a perfect circle, meaning that all events after the t-800 arriving in the past lead to the same decision, when skynet is at the end of the timeline about to be defeated. (So like skynet doesn't get it hands on any informations that it in fact did already try to kill sarah conner, so he doesn't know that this doesn't work). Second assumption we have to make is, that skynet only has the time and/or ressources to send a single terminator in the timeframe between the timemachine being functional and the humans defeating it. Now we just have to assume, that the events of the first movie are not the perfect loop. Something is diffrent which leads to 2 changes: 1) skynet getting the information that it's "most logical attempt" would fail, so instead of going after Sarah Conner, it goes after young John Conner 2) It has a more advanced Terminator model when it's timemachine is ready to go (because he prioritised it's development more, since the t-800 won' t cut it?). Events of the third movie are more or less self explainatory, since they changed Skynets origin at the end of the 3rd movie, so it's logical that the new skynet doesn't decide on the exact same course of action. I hope this is somewhat understandable, i ignored all other sources than the 3 original movies (because i only know those).
Loki said to Thor, IN THE FIRST AVENGERS MOVIE, "How much Dark Energy did The Allfather (Odin) have to conjure to send you here?". That is why when Heimdall sends Hulk to Earth he says: "Allfathers! Let the Dark Magic flow thru me one...last...time." While holding his sword.
A Jurassic World plot hole no one addressed is the Lysine contingency in the dinosaurs where they would die if they weren’t supplied with it. I see your nerdiness and up it.
The line of dialogue about other worlds not having Avengers happens between Marvel and Rhodes. Not Thor. but i can see how you might get confused between the blond blue eyed mid 30's dude who looks like Hitlers wet dream about a master race, and one of a handful of African American leads in the MCU in his early 50's.
@Danny Stowers I find it funny that u actually have nothing better to do but go on TH-cam and look at everything in the TH-cam comment section and just diss people. Shouldn't u have something better to do. Or are u a loser. LOL
@Danny Stowers I find it funny that u actually have nothing better to do but go on TH-cam and look at everything in the TH-cam comment section and just diss people. Shouldn't u have something better to do. Or are u a loser. LOL
Destroying the Death Star wasn’t easy at all. The two rebel squadron leaders, who are presumably the most experienced pilots in the group, both died in the attempt. Luke only made the shot because he used the force instead of his targeting computer. It was literally, as Han says, a one in a million shot.
Indeed. That vent was definitely heavily protected, not to mention considering the size of that station, there's probably vents like that all over the thing. Machinery needs exhaust ports, and if anything the Empire was lucky a port on something that massive was small as it was. The fact that it was such a weakness was probably either overlooked entirely, or not considered a weakness since no fighter should rationally be capable of attacking it directly with torpedoes.
There never was a plot hole for Terminator because Kyle Reis in the first movie stated “One of them, one of us.” It was simple, but those were the rules. If they could just send a bunch of terminators back, it would make no sense for the heroes to survive.
Capt Marvel spent around 20 years being an intergalactic vigilante, but she somehow never encountered the Thanos Family's HALF OFF EVERYTHING genocidal campaign. Whatever! 😡
I'm pretty sure wherever she was, she did actually notice people disappearing before she received Fury's page. And that she realized that whatever was going on where she was, was happening on Earth too.
I hated the Aladdin changes regarding the wishes. In the original he never actually made a wish, so it didn't count. THAT MAKES SENSE. In the new one he says it but isn't holding the lamp so it doesn't count? What kind of bullshit is that? Also, at the end, Jafar doesn't ACTUALLY wish to be a genie any more, so being turned into one is also (cruel) bullshit. It wasn't broken, and now it is, thanks.
The exhaust port was safe. It required a literal space wizard to land that shot. It was deemed unimportant. The entire point of the death star is that it's space Titanic. It's a passion project destroyed by the empires hubris. It being sabotage ruins that.
100% agree. It required full specs of the Death Star to find a weak spot. Guess what, your car has a pretty massive weak point but someone with no idea what a car is or how it works couldnt exploit it. But give them a full specs and some smart people and they will point out you are driving on a plastic container of highly flammable liquid.
Yup. No one remembers the scene where the pilots said that the shot was impossible? Except for Luke who said that he he shot small animals all the time back home and that the shot was possible. Also Luke did not shoot at it first. That was a fail.
There wasnt a plot hole with Loki's sceptre. Yall just not paying attention. Once we found out Hydra had infiltrated SHIELD, it made sense when Strucker wound up with it. The bifrost thing isnt a plot hole either. Loki clearly asks Thor "how much dark magic did the allfather have to conjure to get you here?" in the first Avengers movie. Heimdall saying "let the dark magic flow through me once more" only adds credence to that. There's clearly dark magic in play when using the bifrost without the directional spire.
It was always said in the first Jurassic park film that they weren't perfect clones of the dinosaurs. "They used the DNA of a frog to fill the holes", meaning the holes in the genetic code. If it's only a plot hole because you weren't listening that's on you.
I don't know if it just me I never considered how Shydra got the Loki Staff with the mind stone a plot hole after seeing the events of Captain America The Winter Solider and discovering Shydra within SHIELD it easy to put two and two together to get the Answer.
I don't know why some people have a fixation on movie plot holes. It is only for entertainment. If a movie had zero plot holes it could pass off as being real. That's how you can tell if something is real or not. Look at the largest plot hole in space movies... ... there is no space! If it were real you still can't move in a vacuum or the sun would literally burn you up, etc.
I like how the narrator keeps calling everyone nerds for noticing mistakes, yet this ENTIRE channel posts videos about mistakes in movies almost every day.
Most of the plot holes that they mention aren't even plot holes. I always assumed that the dinosaurs where featherless because there DNA was incomplete and patched with frog DNA.
1:43 I always assumed they were, you know...AN ALIEN SPECIES. No one cares where they came from, by that some logic we'd be asking "Hey, where did the Predators come from." Also Dark Fate didn't fix any plot holes, it's a shit movie that crapped all over the Terminator franchise to score some political brownie points and it can burn in a Nuclear Fire.
I never saw the Alien films (although I remember catching bits and pieces of the first on TV as a kid), but I can't fathom any reason why people would consider an explanation as to their origins such a big deal that the writers would need to come up with some sort of convoluted reasoning behind an alien species from another planet existing. Why can't something exist just because it exists?
I don't think sending one Terminator in the original was necessarily a plot hole. Skynet was on their last leg, and in a hurry by the time the resistance showed up.
Halloween one isn’t a plot hole. The two arguments are flawed. 1. Just because she wasn’t in the opening scene and never alluded to in it, doesn’t mean she could’ve theoretically existed within that opening outside of what was shown in the movie. Sequels do that all the time when introducing new characters or updating existing characters back story’s by using events from the first film to tie them in. Though it’s never stated where Laurie was during the opening of the first film, doesn’t mean she can’t exist within that plot. 2. In part 2 it was spelled out for the audience that Micheals parents put Laurie up for adoption after Micheals murder of Judith. So obviously after having their 6 year old son murder their eldest child, they probably were so distraught they didn’t want to raise Laurie. Hence putting her up for adoption. Halloween 2018 has nothing to do with the brother sister arc since being a direct sequel to the original. so it really doesn’t fix any plot hole when there wasn’t any in the first film.
As far as Aladdin, why is it necessary to have middle eastern actors in the roles, I thought race was a social structure? Also, why is it cool to replace traditionally white characters with non-white versions (I'm looking at you Little Mermaid)? Oh, I forgot, white people need to finish paying for the sins of their ancestors, including those white people who have ancestors that didn't have anything to do with any bad stuff. That's not racism at all, right?
Dark Fate didn't fix any plot holes lol. Just because they didn't pull back the curtain and explain every detail doesn't mean it was a plot hole. Kyle clearly explained this in part 1. Kyle explained the resistance had won the war. Skynet sent the first T800 back as it lost. And Kyle followed. It's pretty logical to think they didn't have the means to send an army of Terminators back. Of course we know Skynet was able to send back the T1000, and John reprogrammed the uncle Bob Terminator. In the original script for T2 this was explained this all happened in one night. But regardless, it's pretty obvious it was a big deal to send something back in time. Skynet sent back what they could. The Dark Fake logic doesn't make any sense. Now all of a sudden multiple Terminators were sent back. Why because it's convenient for the plot? Then why did Arnold lower himself into the steel at the end of T2!? It makes his sacrifice completely worthless. Of course if you forgot the ending of T2 don't worry, Dark Fate will attempt to give you the same exact ending. Only with a trilogy set up instead of a definitive ending..... And if you could send back multiple T800s, why not send them all to 1984 and have them working together? When Sarah isn't expecting a cyborg from the future to try and kill her. I have no problem if you enjoyed Dark Fate, but that was not a plot hole let alone one that was solved by DF.
Terminator Dark Fate created a massive plot hole in Carl though. If Skynet Terminators can survive Skynets destruction/deletion then why wouldnt Skynet just sent a copy of itself into the distant past and ensure it's own existence/creation.
maybe skynet didn't know that or maybe he did,in terminator genesis someone send a T-800 back to the past to protect Sarah connor while she was still a child and erased that T-800 memory so nobody could know who send that terminator,maybe that someone was skynet itself,maybe the skynet we see in the terminator genesis isn't the original and the original is trying to protect sarah to ensure it's own survival,or maybe that T-800 is skynet itself
Am I the only one that has never really understood the flack A New Hope get's for the Death Star's thermal exhaust port weakness. Everybody is always saying "well why didn't they cover it up" did no one pay attention during the officer meeting aboard the Death Star. One of them said if the rebels have obtained critical data tapes then "it's possible however unlikely that they might find a weakness and exploit it" the Empire didn't know about the weakness and even the rebels were pointing out how impossible this mission seemed. When Vader and his boys were perusing them I don't think they even knew what the rebels were trying to hit I think they were just going after them because they couldn't just let enemy fighters continually strafe the outside of the Death Star. I like Rogue One and all but people really think too much about this so called plot hole.
Uh, in what Galaxy far far away exactly does a metal grate make a hole “ invincible”. Because I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen a metal grate that could withstand torpedoes.
I am not an engineer but why isn't there quality assurance of some sorts that would have reviewed the Death Star plan and say "this is a flaw" before commencing the project?
Have you even seen The terminator, Kyle Reese clearly say that they had won the war and that the machines only had time to send one terminator though the time displacement device before the resistance conquered the lap and sent him. And after that they blew the whole thing up.
My plot hole Terminator Dark Fates is Sarah O'Conner still a badass terminator hunter when technically she should have gone back to being a waitress with no memory of John or the future war at the moment John O'Connor dying as he is the one that will send Kylie Reese back in time to protect her
time doesn't work like that in the terminator universe,it's not like in the back to the future where things change,in here they don't that's why the T-800 didn't disappeared either and it's probably like in real life too,if you went back in time and killed your family before you were born,you would probably still exist you would just be living in a timeline where you were never born and in your original timeline you would have disappeared but things would still move on in that timeline
also the types of time travel is different. in T1 the timeline is set in stone. sending a Terminator to change the past set everything in the future ie machines vs humans because of the chip humans find and kyle reese fathering john conner. in T2, sending the machine back caused judgment day to end because they destroy the research.
I thought the dinos not being realistic was obvious from the first film when they said they filled in the blanks in the dna with amphibions and other creatures..... First film, so why were people questioning it still. Silly
As soon as I found out real dinosaurs had feathers that was my immediate assumption about the JP dinosaurs. The feather DNA was located in the aforementioned gene sequence gaps.
Loki says in the first avengers “how much dark energy did father muster to send you here?” Pretty much explaining how Thor got to earth without the bifrost
If you watch the PBS “Eons” series you’ll see that paleontologist now accept that the wide majority of dinosaurs did not in fact have feathers and only the raptor breeds evolved into birds.
But one pothole from HALLOWEEN 2018 remains, why didn't Laurie just move out and on with her life?? I mean real assault victims tend to not want to dewell on a horrible time in their pasr, they try to and eventually move on.
7:10 "to kill a woman before she can FATHER the leader of humanitys future resistance...." Original Star Wars explained why the exhaust port was there because "the Empire doesnt find small fighters to be a threat or they would have better defenses"
There really wasnt a plot hole in the original terminator, Kyle Reece even says that they won the war, skynet was finished but it sent arnie in a last ditch effort to kill J C. Kyle Reece then went in after the terminator.
Indeed - the original and still the best. 2 is fine too but seriously - just leave it alone beyond that, or watch The Sarah Connor Chronacles, which is fun & a shit tonne better than any of the later films.
The Terminator one was actually explained in the first movie, though. Reece told her that they'd managed to drop skynets power grid, and finally won the war. With the last of their power, they sent back the Terminator. That's why he got there later, because they had to get things running again, before he could travel back. So the new terminator was actually the one that broke continuity, there.
Maybe the exhaust port wasn't originally ray shielded, and making it ray shielded was their ray of putting a metal grate on the exhaust port. What about proton torpedoes, that's impossible even for a computer
Not to mention: Rogue One was kickstarted by the public. The base script was even supplied by a fan and added onto. Disney had little to lose by actually making it.
Wow! People nit pick some really stupid stuff! Michael Myers having a younger sibling is not a plot hole! Just because they didn’t show her didn’t mean she didn’t exist. Which was kind of the point! 🙄 Also, I’m not sure you guys even know what a plot hole is.
3:55 nope, in Friday the 13th part VI Tomy Jarvis dug Jason out of his grave and stuck an iron bar into his chest, then a lightning struck that bar and voilá! Jason became a sort of immortal Frankenstein's monster that comes back over and over.
I'd rather keep the plot hole of Terminator then ever have dark fate to be cannon...god I hated that movie, for me the first two are the only Terminator films, everything else is fan fiction
I always preferred that if they HAD to be given an origin, they be explained as living weapons the Engineers created to kill humanity, only to lose control of them, but Prometheus seems to imply that they weren’t the Engineers’ creations either.
Let's be fair, it wasn't JUST for that one plot hole on Rogue One, it could be the main reason, but this was also a good fun way to see how exactly the Rebellion was able to get the plans in the first place, That along with the dark premise of how not every bit of the Rebellion was able to make it out after doing something that just seemed impossible
stop calling it a plothole. the deathstar a giant machine the size of a moon had a single exhaust port maybe double the size of a big truck. Not just that but they also had the entire trench leading up to it covered in canons and turrets. It was literally as small as it could possibly be and they knew about it enough to have it heavily defended. It took a literal jedi using the force in order to exploit this "plothole" stop it.
9:30 Halloween 2018 Laurie’s granddaughter says “No, it was not her brother, that was something people made up.” How can you say they just dropped it? Did you see the movie?
rick weller the new film is technically the sequel to the original Halloween so they’re not siblings or related in any way. John Carpenter even said he never liked making them related he only did it to fill run time.
T1: Excellent no plot holes Skynet SENT 1 for a reason cause they thought be a hail mary like going solo in a quad match and your squad got wiped but you go Rambo for 1 hail mary *only fail* like Skynet in T1. T2: Perfection. Same as T1 only sent a prototype T-1000 *by stitching flesh like a sack to send it back* and they had higher hopes since Skynet is litterally sending the one machine they ACTUALLY FEAR. But they did not see the humans actually sent a reprogrammed T-800 instead of a resistance soldier. Reason being they wouldn't be able to send more TERMINATORS i like to make a hypothesis like *Supernatural* said "time is fluid like a river close to a waterfall you can USE it but can't tame it" so Skynet sending Terminators they would end up in differ time lines but using another series is redundant at best and useless so maybe Skynet in the Terminator franchise litterally tamed time so who knows. Also Dark Fate sucks too much Politics, too much Correctness and a shit ton of WOKE fate be kinda better if REV-9 was actually the good guy sent back BY THE RESISTANCE and that be quite the revelation. But nope gotta agenda that Mexican and Orange Dorito bad SCHTICK
I think you should do a lot of research for terminator. 1. Kyle Reece said "Their defense grid was smashed" and the energy of skynet fortress was off meaning Kyle and Commander Conner would know if more than one is sent 2. Terminator 5 confirms 1 terminator sent to the past 3.Dark fate opens up another plot hole, how did the terminator know they were in Guatemala? Sarah is a wanted fugitive, doesn't have id and John steals cash.
*1:06** It was between Carol and Rodie, not Thor* *The Death Star plothole was solved on Rogue One and then the Republic say "Hey let's make another one exactly as the last one"*
I love how they treat ACTUAL in-movie/in-canon explainations as either hand waves or just completely tune it out and ignore it and keep asking "but no, how'd they do it?" When did people lose the ability to extrapolate?
When everything in media started getting dumbed down to the point where they started expecting every little detail to be explained for them, thus losing their ability to think for themselves, or pay attention to subtle details.
Umm the whole rubbing the lamp thing is in the animated version too.. like they didn't fix a "plot hole" they just did the same thing they did in the first film that I guess you didn't notice
I thought the Beauty and the Beast part would be about how they finally explained why the villagers don't remember a castle exists and what happened to Belle's mom.
When Jason drowns in part 8, his dead body reverts back to the boy he was at the time of his death, suggesting that the curse was broken. In part 9, he's back as if the events of part 8 never took place.
That’s because the producer of part 9 was also the creator of the first film, who refused to return for parts 2-8, and made it clear from the getgo that he did no research and wasn’t going to do research, because he hated the decision to make Jason (who he wrote to be a tragic and sympathetic victim) the villain of the franchise. This and the fact he hated the hockey mask is why Jason spends most of the movie possessing other people instead of being in his own body.
I think that a producer/writer/director explained afterwards that the boy at the end of Part 8 was meant to be the hallucination of the female lead, they just didn't bother/couldn't be bothered explaining during that film and during the start of Part 9 (he is disfigured and his mask is almost a part of his skull because of the toxic backwash or whatever the hell that stuff was. Easy!)
@@shadowdramon01 Victor Miller was the creator of Jason and did not agree with turning him into the star attraction, but he had no involvement with the franchise after the first film. For Pt 9 producer Sean Cunningham had to deal with legal issues with characters and poor writing to the point I think he just didn't give a damn what was happening by the end (and it was him who hated the mask and wanted it gone). Didn't stop him coming back to produce the next three films though!
Halloween 2018 didn't ignore the Laurie as Michael's sister plot. They explicitly mention it and then her granddaughter shrugs it off as just a rumour.
![KRK - ชนิสรา Ft.WanMai , N/A [Official MV] Prod. By Sakarin](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-WMwwYobcU/mqdefault.jpg)
Well, the Jurassic Park plot hole was sort of addressed in the first film when they said the gaps in dinosaur DNA were filled in with tree frog DNA, hence it looking more reptilian-like.
Thats what bothered me the most and people insist that Jurassic Park got things wrong. They knew what they were doing since the beginning.
In the LEGO game it says in the hints "we are currently trying to add feathers to the gallimimus" because mr dna is the one giving the facts/hints
This. Its utterly amazing how many people think that Ingen didnt know they were creating new life when it's spelled out literally in a PowerPoint right after they get to the park. The book spells it out even clearer and if you cared enough to read the comics you would never make the argument in the first place.
Tree frogs are not reptiles. They are amphibians, like newts. A witch once turned me into a newt, but I got better. Still haven't got feathers though.
Crichton even wrote about feathers in JP The Lost World book - but he decided to write it up so that the young Tyrannosaurs had feathers and apparently shed them as they grew older.
Kyle Reese literally explained it
"Its computer was smashed!"
SkyNet lost the fight in the first Terminator
As puntuacted by the recent Terminator videogame in wich you can see the Terminators sent back in time at the same time the final battle between Skynet and the Resistance is happening by the endgame.
@@dadeleemurphy85 Its implied in later movies (Terminator Salvation to be more specific) That Reese is actually the father of John Connor.
Maybe Skynet deleted the data of the 1st T-800 being sent so that it looks like the 2nd was the only one.
I like how most of the comments are correcting half of the "fixed plot holes" and i love how the list uses dark fate as a plot hole fix when dark fate is about 80% plot holes XD
Not to mention the mcu captain marvel stuff I am guilty of both
Laughs in Endgame
Is that all?
Also heimdall doesnt have "part of the bofrost" in him. He used dark magic for hulk but okay 🤷♂️
Do more research before making these videos. The first terminator movie clearly states that Skynet was not able to send back more, that it was a final "hail Mary" play to try to win.
For a channel that is apparently big on the details, you missed that one like a bunch of amateurs.
Plus the resistance told Kyle they were going to destroy the time machine after he went through.
Yet, somehow Skynet managed to send T1000 to kill John, and resistance managed to capture, reprogram and send back T-800.
Yup, that time machine was destroyed, we are sure about that.
Thank you.
@jason lewis terminator:resistance mentioned in the ending that 3 terminators travelled back in time at once in different points of time, one of which was t-1000 sent to kill john connor
@@saugattamang9739 Yeah but the plot in a video game does not make it canon.
Cameron's original draft of the T2 script included how the T800 and T1000 were sent back. After Kyle was sent back they found another room, I believe it was sealed with ice. When they went through the new door they found where the T1000 was sent back. At this exact time they reprogrammed a T800 and sent back as well. So I know it didn't make it to film, but Cameron's original vision had everyone sent back on that same night.
Fun fact, Hydra's less outgoing sibling organization...Shydra
Shydra, Convenant, ... they're just rewriting everything.
Hydra, shmydra.
Alright stop 🚫 now while you're ahead! 😋
They need a new Marvel Hero: The Dehydrator.
HYDRA INFILTRATED IN S.H.I.E.L.D
H.I.I.S.H.I.E.L.D Or Without The In
H.I.S.H.I.E.L.D
The Bifrost plot hole was explained in the same movie. "How much dark energy did the alfather have to summon..."
Brian Forrest you can tell how much research they put into it
Thank you finally someone who remembered it
@@charliejohns9102 pretty sure this channel even included it in an old video about "plot holes" that are explained in the same movie.
I was thinking the same thing. This channel is crap. He even uses the same opening line when doing both Disney movies. Lazy writing
@@diabetes_inc8311 as a type 1, I approve your name.
In the cartoon Aladdin, I thought he had to say “I wish” for it to be official. When Aladdin was in the water, genie took his head bobbing in the water as a nod “yes” for the wish.
That’s how he got the free wish out of the cave of wonders. He didn’t say “I wish”, he just bet the genie he couldn’t go it. Not a wish.
Yes, I think about Disney movies too much
Canadian Dee they never actually defined how wishes worked in the cartoon version, but that's how it looked to me.
They did define it. It's rub the lamp and say I wish and it's the same word for word on the new movie. They just didn't research this video at all it's not the only thing they got wrong tbf
That's not thinking too much about it. I saw the movie in theaters when I was seven, and that was obvious the first time.
yeah, this was easily explained in the cartoon. aside from having to spell it out for people, the lines of dialogue show he didn't make a wish to get out of the cave of wonders, made a wish to be a prince, made a wish to not drown (genie literally says "I'll take that as a yes" when aladdin's head nods), then makes a wish to set the genie free. its not complicated. I knew this when I was 10
How did he make a wish not to drown? He was unconscious. Due to gravity, Aladdin's head fell down in the same way a nod would happen. The genie saw this and took it as a yes but that doesn't change the fact that Aladdin never made the wish
Heimdall didn't send Thor to Earth in Avengers. Odin did. And they said that in the film.
Yeah. Loki says "How much dark energy did father have to use to send you here?" mere minutes after Thor yeets him out of the jet.
@@SomeRandomJackAss and presumably they could have used the space stone to restore the rainbow bridge since Odin has it at the end of the film. And in the next movie the bridge is back. Makes since because it's whole thing is about space teleportation
Though that part is just a fantheory of mine.
yea everyone keeps screaming "Plot Hole" when its literally explained in the film!! its like people just look for issues for the sake of looking for issues!
The movie was to masculine for the narrator to actually watch
@@Kekkersboy sense*
Kyle Reese says that they had smashed skynets defense grid and had won, makes sense that only one would be sent back due to things falling apart around them, dark fate having a second to kill John was just a stupid decision to shock and "raise the stakes" and to make the new lead more important
If Skynet only had the opportunity to send one T-800 to the 1980s, where did the T-1000 come from?
@@ranwolf1240 Probably an altered timeline due to the existence of the T-800's remains
@@ranwolf1240 in the new timeline they gave skynet the t-800 technology decades before the original timeline had it.
@@ranwolf1240 idiot they sent more than one terminator to different timelines just before there defense grid got smashed they sent more than one terminatos the t-800 to kill Sarah Connor before John was born and the other a t-1000 to kill John Connor .
@@darklordmordred if they have played terminator resistance they would have understand how that skynet didn't just send one terminator I sent 3 terminator to 3 different timelines and the resistance did the same they sent Kyle Reese to stop the t-800 , a reprogrammed t-800 to stop the t-1000 and the other protector was unknown.
DARK FATE REALLY???? They "corrected" an plothole by destroying the entire terminator universe/franchise...
TheLastPrimor I hated that it bothered me soooo much
How does he know that terminator was from the first film? 🤔
Well it is the darkest timeline of all the Terminator timelines... so Dark Fate is a good title
I love that everything past the second movie got thrown out. They were shit movies full of holes and bad writing. Turned it into a respectable trilogy for Sarah conner.
The should read if the bot. Fucking autocorrect.
WC: "Hey dark fate writers, thanks for fixing that plot hole"
Dark fate writers: "There was a plot hole?"
The plot hole is how much money did they burn in the dumpster fire to make this movie
So if in the original there was 2 terminaters there the whole time. Why did it take So long for the 2nd to find and kill John
The one that kills John was not there in 1984
Bad writing from Watch Culture
Gray Snake They were sent back at the same time in the future, but each one was sent back to different points in the past.
The placement of Loki's sceptor was easy to figure out if you paid attention to The Winter Solider
for the next video.. how about "10 'plot holes' (mistakes) we had in our video about plot holes" 😂
Or rather: 10 videos that say why Adam Clearly should be let out.
Skynet not sending more Terminators was never a plot hole. They explain things in the first Terminator. First of all, sending the Terminator back was a last ditch effort by Skynet after it was defeated. Second, pre-war records were destroyed so Skynet had very little information about Sarah and John Connor. That's why the Terminator in T1 was going around killing every Sarah Connor it could find.
There’s a mistake at 47 seconds in; when did SHYDRA steal Loki’s sceptor 😉
That's actually two mistakes - it's *sceptre* not *sceptor*
@@banehog it can also be spelled scepter too, but I've never seen it speed with an or at the end lol
Nr 9,the wrote Convenant
Thats the Special Hydra!
That was answered in Endgame
Alien: Covenant actually screwed up more than it "fixed" according to the other films the xenomorphs existed many hundreds (possibly thousands) of years before humans discovered space travel.
John Fromm if you go off avp the predators brought them here to earth during the first civilization
Avp is still a canon film as it deals with the first weyland. But in alien it is noted that the engineer ship with an engineer was hundreds of years old but first off david apparently wiped out the engineers about 70 years before the first film and created the xenomorphs after the destruction of the engineers. Without including avp even Scott's alien films dont make sense
You are correct that the host makes the physical difference but david making the aliens makes no sense timeline wise
Sarah Connor fathered John Connor?🤔
David Williams just like Cartman’s mom
@@oldDNU Definitely😂 Who is John Connor's father?... is it Kyle Reese? Lt Traxler? Dr Silberman?
Like Chaz Bono, she decided she was a man all along. Lol
About to comment the same thing; had to scroll first and saw you beat me to it.
@@davidwilliams7348 hal vukovich?
#9 - WE DON'T ALWAYS NEED AN EXPLANATION FOR WHY THINGS ARE THINGS. Aliens didn't need a backstory. They just are.
Yeah! It makes no sense! Not everything needs to be explained.
@@lilapostropheproductions You telling me you didn't need to know the exact origin of Han Solo's blaster and name that no one ever thought meant anything anyway?
@@NekoMouser Well, no.
Of course Alien/Aliens didn’t need a backstory. But we didn’t _need_ Alien/Aliens either. The value of a thing is in the thing itself. You can criticise Prometheus and Covenant for being bad films, but whether they are necessary or not is irrelevant.
@@baffy2000 Prometheus isn't a BAD film, it really isn't. Covenant kinda is though.
The exhaust port of the Darth Star is NOT a plot hole. It was never a plot hole. The whole point of the Rebels getting the blueprints was to find some kind of tactical advantage to exploit.
If YOU think it was a plot whole, then you'd should never watch any kind of heist or spy movie. NEVER!!
I never thought of as a plot hole more of Empire being arrogant that they don't consider plans important to worry about they could easily run tests of the station to see if there are anything rebels could use against them but choose not to.
Robot Chickens explains it much better than Disney.
@@SuperShaka71 Yet Robot Chicken did leave us with another glaring question: What's an Aluminum Falcon?
It wasn't a plot hole. The Empire just thought it was a tricky enough shot that only a Force user who was also a great pilot could pull it off. They didn't know of Luke's existence so as far as they knew only Vader could have done it and he was on their side.
07:14 „A big, scary robot goes back in time to kill a woman before she can *father* the leader of humanity‘s future resistance.“
You sure that you didn‘t mean „give birth to“?
I swear you guys are just doing this to get more comments, and I‘m falling for it.
In the 2018 Halloween movie they state that the babysitter being Micheal sister was something the news made up for headlines and that it was not true
theres a damn baby in the opening of halloween 1978 its laurie strode,judith myers is the slut baby sitter he kills and the baby is in the crib in the house just fine
rick weller yeah well I’m telling you what the movie said, the baby could be in the foster care system and is living In Italy for all I care, the movies says they aren’t siblings they retconned it
The terminator plot hole wasn't a plot hole . It was explained that skynet sent back 2 terminators then the resistance took control of the time machine sending back a reprogrammed third terminator to protect John meaning skynet no longer had means of sending anything back pretty much making every movie past t2 a plot hole which is why it should h ave ended with t2 .
Now dark fate doesn't solve a single plot hole instead it really makes the entire series of movies a worthless plot hole .
John sent his father back and skynet sent the terminator that ultimately ends up getting used to create skynet . If John dies summer doesn't send back a terminator meaning skynet isn't made meaning no plans to be used to make legion since legion was made from plans of an abandoned skynet and if there was plans for skynet why build legion . Not to mention Carl if he was a skynet terminator should have phased out of existence the same time skynet was defeated meaning he would really have to be a legion terminator and if that is the case why would it matter to legion if John lives or dies since John isn't the one destined to lead the resistance against legion . And there is the whole John himself should have phased out of existence at the end of t2 . Yeah dark fate solves nothing in fact it is basically plot hole the movie .
if you think about it, John being alive pretty much guarantees the war will happen. After all if John is dead there would be no reason to send a T-800 to kill John or Sarah(John doesn't exist and Sarah is a nobody) If there's no T-800, there's no reason to send Reese back in time. If Reese isn't sent back, he can't get Sarah pregnant. It's basically a time loop as long as John exist
magicrainbow aids. Great. Please don’t point that out. 🤫 Because now they will have to make yet another bad Terminator movie to explain it all over again.
That's why Genysis was so good. It actually did solve the plot holes created by T3 and Salvation. Everything after T2 is an alternate timeline the Skynet that turns John into a Terminator in Genisys is from a timeilne where it wins and starts moving laterally in time.
No that's why it should have ended with t2 then the plot holes of t3
would never have happened . Plus it was planned that t2 would be the end greedy execs forced a change to the end to leave room for t3 .
If you like the later movies good they did there job they entertained you . That doesn't change the fact everything past 2 is a plot hole and dark fate is the worst being a movie of nothing but plot holes.
5:10 that was literally answered seconds away in that same scene, Loki states that Odin must have summoned a great large of dark Magic to send Thor. I sometimes wonder how nerd are you really
I dont think only having 1 terminator in 1984 was a plot hole. That was just bad writing in Terminator dark fate
Some holes should never be fixed
Plus she can't "father" the leader, she can only "mother" the leader, because she is a WOMAN!
Yeah I didn't understand it, especially since the timeline has become convuluted and confusing by the time Dark Fate came out.
Shouldn't the destruction of both T800s and evidence on T2 prevent the existence of Skynet or or the delivery of Terminators into the past?
And how does the Terminator from Dark Fate know the whereabouts of Rev-9 if it's a whole different AI/creator?
@@cerisem7727 how did Sarah knew a human girl is being attacked by cybernetic organisms?
I just saw it as time travel requiring some vast resource just to send a single entity, so it was illogical to try sending more when one should be enough. Especially if said resource made sending more than one at a time impossible.
What culture: Hey you know those seven or so modern movies you hate? Well they fixed something you never gave a damn about to begin with!
Ok...the Terminator “plot hole” is anything but, and was technically addressed in both the original AND salvation (and even Genesis!)...the original terminator was sent back as a last gambit by Skynet shortly before its defeat by Connor’s rebels, with Kyle following in the wake of their victory. There was no chance to send back a second at that point
Then in Salvation, they showed how the mechanisms to activate and place the terminator were actually quite slow, so if one was activated to send back it would be a drawn out process
Then Genysis actually shows how Connor’s army appeared to have won the war before Reece travelled back.
Yes, each of these would technically be a different timeline, but there’s not really a plot hole...Skynet just never had the chance
so where did the T-1000 come from?
@@ranwolf1240 Because of the way Sarah and Reese stopped the Terminator inthe first movie that altered the Time Line somewhat, effectively changing it so Skynet had enough time to send the T-1000 back.
Okay, had to think a lot to come up with a proper explanation.
First up let's set a base for the events of the original Terminator movie.
It's for once a selffullfilling prophecy, in that sense that Skynet is only defeated because John Conner exists, but John Conner only exists because Skynet sent a Terminator to kill his mother and he did send his father to protect her.
Also the Skynet in the future of the first movie exists because of the remains of the t-800 in the past as we learn in the second movie.
Now we assume that you have a timeline which looks like a perfect circle, meaning that all events after the t-800 arriving in the past lead to the same decision, when skynet is at the end of the timeline about to be defeated. (So like skynet doesn't get it hands on any informations that it in fact did already try to kill sarah conner, so he doesn't know that this doesn't work).
Second assumption we have to make is, that skynet only has the time and/or ressources to send a single terminator in the timeframe between the timemachine being functional and the humans defeating it.
Now we just have to assume, that the events of the first movie are not the perfect loop. Something is diffrent which leads to 2 changes: 1) skynet getting the information that it's "most logical attempt" would fail, so instead of going after Sarah Conner, it goes after young John Conner
2) It has a more advanced Terminator model when it's timemachine is ready to go (because he prioritised it's development more, since the t-800 won' t cut it?).
Events of the third movie are more or less self explainatory, since they changed Skynets origin at the end of the 3rd movie, so it's logical that the new skynet doesn't decide on the exact same course of action.
I hope this is somewhat understandable, i ignored all other sources than the 3 original movies (because i only know those).
@@Nugire This is why Time Travel NEVER makes sense and doesn't exist.
Loki said to Thor, IN THE FIRST AVENGERS MOVIE, "How much Dark Energy did The Allfather (Odin) have to conjure to send you here?". That is why when Heimdall sends Hulk to Earth he says: "Allfathers! Let the Dark Magic flow thru me one...last...time." While holding his sword.
A Jurassic World plot hole no one addressed is the Lysine contingency in the dinosaurs where they would die if they weren’t supplied with it.
I see your nerdiness and up it.
#3: How is that a fix for a plot hole when it contradicts John obviously surviving until the war in other films?
they treated like everything past 2 wasn't canon.
MementoAnxius john surviving until the war was part of one and two be necessity.
Ryan Jenkins except they changed the future with their actions in 2 so literally anything can happen
The line of dialogue about other worlds not having Avengers happens between Marvel and Rhodes. Not Thor. but i can see how you might get confused between the blond blue eyed mid 30's dude who looks like Hitlers wet dream about a master race, and one of a handful of African American leads in the MCU in his early 50's.
Zoinks
Ok boomer
@Danny Stowers Bah! Who needs research now a days when you can do everything by memory
@Danny Stowers I find it funny that u actually have nothing better to do but go on TH-cam and look at everything in the TH-cam comment section and just diss people. Shouldn't u have something better to do. Or are u a loser. LOL
@Danny Stowers I find it funny that u actually have nothing better to do but go on TH-cam and look at everything in the TH-cam comment section and just diss people. Shouldn't u have something better to do. Or are u a loser. LOL
7:07 FATHERED? My good sir, have u a basic concept of biology? lololol
Did you just assume their gender lol
@@pauldrummond755 hahaha :D
Dark Fate also permanently fixed the glaring problem of the franchise being both profitable and enjoyed by audiences.
To be fair a lot of that was blowback from Terminator: Genisys.
Destroying the Death Star wasn’t easy at all. The two rebel squadron leaders, who are presumably the most experienced pilots in the group, both died in the attempt. Luke only made the shot because he used the force instead of his targeting computer. It was literally, as Han says, a one in a million shot.
Indeed. That vent was definitely heavily protected, not to mention considering the size of that station, there's probably vents like that all over the thing. Machinery needs exhaust ports, and if anything the Empire was lucky a port on something that massive was small as it was. The fact that it was such a weakness was probably either overlooked entirely, or not considered a weakness since no fighter should rationally be capable of attacking it directly with torpedoes.
Yeah I never saw this as a plot hole either but we got Rogue One from it so I'm happy
Speaking of Han, Luke would've also died if he hadn't showed up to intervene.
@@jimthar17 How is that a plot hole? It's literally explained in the opening crawl.
There never was a plot hole for Terminator because Kyle Reis in the first movie stated “One of them, one of us.” It was simple, but those were the rules. If they could just send a bunch of terminators back, it would make no sense for the heroes to survive.
Capt Marvel spent around 20 years being an intergalactic vigilante, but she somehow never encountered the Thanos Family's HALF OFF EVERYTHING genocidal campaign. Whatever! 😡
I'm pretty sure wherever she was, she did actually notice people disappearing before she received Fury's page. And that she realized that whatever was going on where she was, was happening on Earth too.
She never says "Thanos never heard of him"
I hated the Aladdin changes regarding the wishes. In the original he never actually made a wish, so it didn't count. THAT MAKES SENSE. In the new one he says it but isn't holding the lamp so it doesn't count? What kind of bullshit is that? Also, at the end, Jafar doesn't ACTUALLY wish to be a genie any more, so being turned into one is also (cruel) bullshit. It wasn't broken, and now it is, thanks.
The exhaust port was safe. It required a literal space wizard to land that shot. It was deemed unimportant.
The entire point of the death star is that it's space Titanic. It's a passion project destroyed by the empires hubris. It being sabotage ruins that.
100% agree.
It required full specs of the Death Star to find a weak spot.
Guess what, your car has a pretty massive weak point but someone with no idea what a car is or how it works couldnt exploit it. But give them a full specs and some smart people and they will point out you are driving on a plastic container of highly flammable liquid.
Don't care. Photoshopping Vader's image over Apocalypse's Weapon X fan service made the film worth it
@@emory442 to you*
Yup. No one remembers the scene where the pilots said that the shot was impossible? Except for Luke who said that he he shot small animals all the time back home and that the shot was possible. Also Luke did not shoot at it first. That was a fail.
There wasnt a plot hole with Loki's sceptre. Yall just not paying attention. Once we found out Hydra had infiltrated SHIELD, it made sense when Strucker wound up with it.
The bifrost thing isnt a plot hole either. Loki clearly asks Thor "how much dark magic did the allfather have to conjure to get you here?" in the first Avengers movie. Heimdall saying "let the dark magic flow through me once more" only adds credence to that. There's clearly dark magic in play when using the bifrost without the directional spire.
People can't catch subtlety.
It was always said in the first Jurassic park film that they weren't perfect clones of the dinosaurs. "They used the DNA of a frog to fill the holes", meaning the holes in the genetic code. If it's only a plot hole because you weren't listening that's on you.
I don't know if it just me I never considered how Shydra got the Loki Staff with the mind stone a plot hole after seeing the events of Captain America The Winter Solider and discovering Shydra within SHIELD it easy to put two and two together to get the Answer.
I don't know why some people have a fixation on movie plot holes. It is only for entertainment. If a movie had zero plot holes it could pass off as being real. That's how you can tell if something is real or not. Look at the largest plot hole in space movies... ... there is no space! If it were real you still can't move in a vacuum or the sun would literally burn you up, etc.
I like how the narrator keeps calling everyone nerds for noticing mistakes, yet this ENTIRE channel posts videos about mistakes in movies almost every day.
Most of the plot holes that they mention aren't even plot holes. I always assumed that the dinosaurs where featherless because there DNA was incomplete and patched with frog DNA.
@@frankficcle7081 Do you honestly think these brainlets actually fact check their shit?
1:43 I always assumed they were, you know...AN ALIEN SPECIES. No one cares where they came from, by that some logic we'd be asking "Hey, where did the Predators come from." Also Dark Fate didn't fix any plot holes, it's a shit movie that crapped all over the Terminator franchise to score some political brownie points and it can burn in a Nuclear Fire.
I never saw the Alien films (although I remember catching bits and pieces of the first on TV as a kid), but I can't fathom any reason why people would consider an explanation as to their origins such a big deal that the writers would need to come up with some sort of convoluted reasoning behind an alien species from another planet existing. Why can't something exist just because it exists?
I'm so glad they explained that Heimdall plot point! I wish he would've had more to do in every film he's in!
I don't think sending one Terminator in the original was necessarily a plot hole. Skynet was on their last leg, and in a hurry by the time the resistance showed up.
Halloween one isn’t a plot hole. The two arguments are flawed.
1. Just because she wasn’t in the opening scene and never alluded to in it, doesn’t mean she could’ve theoretically existed within that opening outside of what was shown in the movie. Sequels do that all the time when introducing new characters or updating existing characters back story’s by using events from the first film to tie them in. Though it’s never stated where Laurie was during the opening of the first film, doesn’t mean she can’t exist within that plot.
2. In part 2 it was spelled out for the audience that Micheals parents put Laurie up for adoption after Micheals murder of Judith. So obviously after having their 6 year old son murder their eldest child, they probably were so distraught they didn’t want to raise Laurie. Hence putting her up for adoption.
Halloween 2018 has nothing to do with the brother sister arc since being a direct sequel to the original. so it really doesn’t fix any plot hole when there wasn’t any in the first film.
she was in the crib that he walks by with the mask on like 4 mins in in the original. hse was the baby in the babysitter role duh.
rick weller Laurie as a baby is never in the original.
As far as Aladdin, why is it necessary to have middle eastern actors in the roles, I thought race was a social structure? Also, why is it cool to replace traditionally white characters with non-white versions (I'm looking at you Little Mermaid)? Oh, I forgot, white people need to finish paying for the sins of their ancestors, including those white people who have ancestors that didn't have anything to do with any bad stuff. That's not racism at all, right?
Dark Fate didn't fix any plot holes lol. Just because they didn't pull back the curtain and explain every detail doesn't mean it was a plot hole. Kyle clearly explained this in part 1.
Kyle explained the resistance had won the war. Skynet sent the first T800 back as it lost. And Kyle followed. It's pretty logical to think they didn't have the means to send an army of Terminators back. Of course we know Skynet was able to send back the T1000, and John reprogrammed the uncle Bob Terminator. In the original script for T2 this was explained this all happened in one night. But regardless, it's pretty obvious it was a big deal to send something back in time. Skynet sent back what they could.
The Dark Fake logic doesn't make any sense. Now all of a sudden multiple Terminators were sent back. Why because it's convenient for the plot? Then why did Arnold lower himself into the steel at the end of T2!? It makes his sacrifice completely worthless. Of course if you forgot the ending of T2 don't worry, Dark Fate will attempt to give you the same exact ending. Only with a trilogy set up instead of a definitive ending.....
And if you could send back multiple T800s, why not send them all to 1984 and have them working together? When Sarah isn't expecting a cyborg from the future to try and kill her.
I have no problem if you enjoyed Dark Fate, but that was not a plot hole let alone one that was solved by DF.
Terminator Dark Fate created a massive plot hole in Carl though. If Skynet Terminators can survive Skynets destruction/deletion then why wouldnt Skynet just sent a copy of itself into the distant past and ensure it's own existence/creation.
Maybe they did.
@@munkeemojo except grace confirms that Legion and Skynet are unrelated and Carl dies. So no they didnt.
maybe skynet didn't know that or maybe he did,in terminator genesis someone send a T-800 back to the past to protect Sarah connor while she was still a child and erased that T-800 memory so nobody could know who send that terminator,maybe that someone was skynet itself,maybe the skynet we see in the terminator genesis isn't the original and the original is trying to protect sarah to ensure it's own survival,or maybe that T-800 is skynet itself
“And what’s cleverest of all.” Said no one about any Terminator after 2!
Am I the only one that has never really understood the flack A New Hope get's for the Death Star's thermal exhaust port weakness. Everybody is always saying "well why didn't they cover it up" did no one pay attention during the officer meeting aboard the Death Star. One of them said if the rebels have obtained critical data tapes then "it's possible however unlikely that they might find a weakness and exploit it" the Empire didn't know about the weakness and even the rebels were pointing out how impossible this mission seemed. When Vader and his boys were perusing them I don't think they even knew what the rebels were trying to hit I think they were just going after them because they couldn't just let enemy fighters continually strafe the outside of the Death Star. I like Rogue One and all but people really think too much about this so called plot hole.
One billion dollars made off a movie to fix one plot hole?
Hollywood is a strange place...
Uh, in what Galaxy far far away exactly does a metal grate make a hole “ invincible”. Because I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen a metal grate that could withstand torpedoes.
I am not an engineer but why isn't there quality assurance of some sorts that would have reviewed the Death Star plan and say "this is a flaw" before commencing the project?
Have you even seen The terminator, Kyle Reese clearly say that they had won the war and that the machines only had time to send one terminator though the time displacement device before the resistance conquered the lap and sent him.
And after that they blew the whole thing up.
Having Terminator Dark Fate on a list that states movies that “fixed” anything is an absolute travesty. Dark fate killed the franchise.
My plot hole Terminator Dark Fates is Sarah O'Conner still a badass terminator hunter when technically she should have gone back to being a waitress with no memory of John or the future war at the moment John O'Connor dying as he is the one that will send Kylie Reese back in time to protect her
time doesn't work like that in the terminator universe,it's not like in the back to the future where things change,in here they don't that's why the T-800 didn't disappeared either and it's probably like in real life too,if you went back in time and killed your family before you were born,you would probably still exist you would just be living in a timeline where you were never born and in your original timeline you would have disappeared but things would still move on in that timeline
also the types of time travel is different.
in T1 the timeline is set in stone. sending a Terminator to change the past set everything in the future ie machines vs humans because of the chip humans find and kyle reese fathering john conner.
in T2, sending the machine back caused judgment day to end because they destroy the research.
Thanks for the uploads! Love you all!!
I thought the dinos not being realistic was obvious from the first film when they said they filled in the blanks in the dna with amphibions and other creatures..... First film, so why were people questioning it still. Silly
As soon as I found out real dinosaurs had feathers that was my immediate assumption about the JP dinosaurs. The feather DNA was located in the aforementioned gene sequence gaps.
@@KEVMAN7987 thank you! Exactly.
Loki says in the first avengers “how much dark energy did father muster to send you here?” Pretty much explaining how Thor got to earth without the bifrost
If you watch the PBS “Eons” series you’ll see that paleontologist now accept that the wide majority of dinosaurs did not in fact have feathers and only the raptor breeds evolved into birds.
As a child we were taught that dinosaurs had that distinction I'm 54
Hold on, what’s SHYRDA
I was looking for this before commenting about it. Lol
Rob Zombie's Halloween movie was awesome I don't get why people didn't like it.
But one pothole from HALLOWEEN 2018 remains, why didn't Laurie just move out and on with her life?? I mean real assault victims tend to not want to dewell on a horrible time in their pasr, they try to and eventually move on.
How is a decision most people don`t make a plot hole?Not every one moves on.
Fun fact changing things to make them more PC are not plot holes....
Technically speaking..... Jurassic park 1 explains this. They mix Dino DNA with frogs.
They didn't ignore the Laurie Strode/Mike Myers sibling point. One of her granddaughter's friends asks her about it and they said it was a fake rumor.
7:10 "to kill a woman before she can FATHER the leader of humanitys future resistance...."
Original Star Wars explained why the exhaust port was there because "the Empire doesnt find small fighters to be a threat or they would have better defenses"
There really wasnt a plot hole in the original terminator, Kyle Reece even says that they won the war, skynet was finished but it sent arnie in a last ditch effort to kill J C.
Kyle Reece then went in after the terminator.
Indeed - the original and still the best. 2 is fine too but seriously - just leave it alone beyond that, or watch The Sarah Connor Chronacles, which is fun & a shit tonne better than any of the later films.
The Terminator one was actually explained in the first movie, though. Reece told her that they'd managed to drop skynets power grid, and finally won the war. With the last of their power, they sent back the Terminator. That's why he got there later, because they had to get things running again, before he could travel back. So the new terminator was actually the one that broke continuity, there.
Maybe the exhaust port wasn't originally ray shielded, and making it ray shielded was their ray of putting a metal grate on the exhaust port. What about proton torpedoes, that's impossible even for a computer
Not to mention: Rogue One was kickstarted by the public. The base script was even supplied by a fan and added onto. Disney had little to lose by actually making it.
Another list about plot holes describing things that aren't plot holes.
Wow! People nit pick some really stupid stuff! Michael Myers having a younger sibling is not a plot hole! Just because they didn’t show her didn’t mean she didn’t exist. Which was kind of the point! 🙄 Also, I’m not sure you guys even know what a plot hole is.
she was in the crib in 1963 and judith was babysitting and had a guy over and mike killed her
3:55 nope, in Friday the 13th part VI Tomy Jarvis dug Jason out of his grave and stuck an iron bar into his chest, then a lightning struck that bar and voilá! Jason became a sort of immortal Frankenstein's monster that comes back over and over.
Rubbing the lamp thing in Aladdin actually annoyed the hell out of me... I liked the way Aladdin outsmarted the genie..
I'd rather keep the plot hole of Terminator then ever have dark fate to be cannon...god I hated that movie, for me the first two are the only Terminator films, everything else is fan fiction
Hated it too. First two are the only true good ones and the OG
That's why I love Genisys it protects the sanctity of T1 and 2 while allowing for everything else to be different timelines.
The xenomorphs existed before David. In Prometheus there is a picture of a xenomorph on the wall in the chamber with all the eggs.
I always preferred that if they HAD to be given an origin, they be explained as living weapons the Engineers created to kill humanity, only to lose control of them, but Prometheus seems to imply that they weren’t the Engineers’ creations either.
They are also on earth meny years before in the Alien vs Predictor films.which is an even bigger plot hole.
Let's be fair, it wasn't JUST for that one plot hole on Rogue One, it could be the main reason, but this was also a good fun way to see how exactly the Rebellion was able to get the plans in the first place, That along with the dark premise of how not every bit of the Rebellion was able to make it out after doing something that just seemed impossible
stop calling it a plothole. the deathstar a giant machine the size of a moon had a single exhaust port maybe double the size of a big truck. Not just that but they also had the entire trench leading up to it covered in canons and turrets. It was literally as small as it could possibly be and they knew about it enough to have it heavily defended. It took a literal jedi using the force in order to exploit this "plothole" stop it.
9:30 Halloween 2018 Laurie’s granddaughter says “No, it was not her brother, that was something people made up.” How can you say they just dropped it? Did you see the movie?
red herring,laurie and michael are bro and sis
rick weller the new film is technically the sequel to the original Halloween so they’re not siblings or related in any way. John Carpenter even said he never liked making them related he only did it to fill run time.
T1: Excellent no plot holes Skynet SENT 1 for a reason cause they thought be a hail mary like going solo in a quad match and your squad got wiped but you go Rambo for 1 hail mary *only fail* like Skynet in T1.
T2: Perfection. Same as T1 only sent a prototype T-1000 *by stitching flesh like a sack to send it back* and they had higher hopes since Skynet is litterally sending the one machine they ACTUALLY FEAR. But they did not see the humans actually sent a reprogrammed T-800 instead of a resistance soldier.
Reason being they wouldn't be able to send more TERMINATORS i like to make a hypothesis like *Supernatural* said "time is fluid like a river close to a waterfall you can USE it but can't tame it" so Skynet sending Terminators they would end up in differ time lines but using another series is redundant at best and useless so maybe Skynet in the Terminator franchise litterally tamed time so who knows. Also Dark Fate sucks too much Politics, too much Correctness and a shit ton of WOKE fate be kinda better if REV-9 was actually the good guy sent back BY THE RESISTANCE and that be quite the revelation. But nope gotta agenda that Mexican and Orange Dorito bad SCHTICK
*eyeroll* When the only people seeing a political message are the ones who don't like the message they think they see.
Exactly! When did Shydra steal Loki's sceptor?
I think you should do a lot of research for terminator.
1. Kyle Reece said "Their defense grid was smashed" and the energy of skynet fortress was off meaning Kyle and Commander Conner would know if more than one is sent
2. Terminator 5 confirms 1 terminator sent to the past
3.Dark fate opens up another plot hole, how did the terminator know they were in Guatemala? Sarah is a wanted fugitive, doesn't have id and John steals cash.
Running out of ideas I see whatculture
Rogue One has to be number 1. Nice video
Addition to 10: they also explained why Loki had his mouth covered when he was captured
"Disney casted more appropriate actors for Aladdin.." proceeds to have will smith as the Genie
Hydra is misspelled.
*1:06** It was between Carol and Rodie, not Thor*
*The Death Star plothole was solved on Rogue One and then the Republic say "Hey let's make another one exactly as the last one"*
I love how they treat ACTUAL in-movie/in-canon explainations as either hand waves or just completely tune it out and ignore it and keep asking "but no, how'd they do it?" When did people lose the ability to extrapolate?
When everything in media started getting dumbed down to the point where they started expecting every little detail to be explained for them, thus losing their ability to think for themselves, or pay attention to subtle details.
How does Sarah Connor 'father' John (7:18)? That raises all sorts of plumbing questions?
HAIL SHYDRA!
Umm the whole rubbing the lamp thing is in the animated version too.. like they didn't fix a "plot hole" they just did the same thing they did in the first film that I guess you didn't notice
Exactly. The lamp has to be rubbed to make Genie come out first.
Makes you wonder if people actually even saw the animated movie
@@Kennymacdougall thank you for making me feel less alone hahaha
I thought the Beauty and the Beast part would be about how they finally explained why the villagers don't remember a castle exists and what happened to Belle's mom.
When Jason drowns in part 8, his dead body reverts back to the boy he was at the time of his death, suggesting that the curse was broken. In part 9, he's back as if the events of part 8 never took place.
That’s because the producer of part 9 was also the creator of the first film, who refused to return for parts 2-8, and made it clear from the getgo that he did no research and wasn’t going to do research, because he hated the decision to make Jason (who he wrote to be a tragic and sympathetic victim) the villain of the franchise. This and the fact he hated the hockey mask is why Jason spends most of the movie possessing other people instead of being in his own body.
@@shadowdramon01 Ok. Thanks. Now I know how to watch it. 1-8 or 1 and 9.
I think that a producer/writer/director explained afterwards that the boy at the end of Part 8 was meant to be the hallucination of the female lead, they just didn't bother/couldn't be bothered explaining during that film and during the start of Part 9 (he is disfigured and his mask is almost a part of his skull because of the toxic backwash or whatever the hell that stuff was. Easy!)
@@shadowdramon01 Victor Miller was the creator of Jason and did not agree with turning him into the star attraction, but he had no involvement with the franchise after the first film. For Pt 9 producer Sean Cunningham had to deal with legal issues with characters and poor writing to the point I think he just didn't give a damn what was happening by the end (and it was him who hated the mask and wanted it gone). Didn't stop him coming back to produce the next three films though!
"And your dad liked it." Haha, well done.
Halloween 2018 didn't ignore the Laurie as Michael's sister plot. They explicitly mention it and then her granddaughter shrugs it off as just a rumour.
I always thought Skynet only sent one terminator per movie was because that was all their budget could afford. 😂