ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2024
- In the intense world of the aviation industry, Boeing and Airbus have been competing fiercely for many years. The CEO of Boeing, Dave Calhoun, is an experienced leader who has seen the ups but mostly the downs of this tough competition, particularly in the aftermath of several setbacks faced by Boeing in recent years. Because of this Airbus seemed to be doing better, causing some concerns among Boeing's team. However, in a surprising move, Dave Calhoun, Boeing's CEO, has decided to speak up and share some important truths about Boeing's thoughts on Airbus. This revelation is expected to give us a new understanding of how the aviation industry works and what lies ahead for both companies.
✈️ Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more travel-related content! ✈️
Tags: boeing,boeing 737 max,airbus,boeing 737,boeing 747,boeing news,airbus news,david calhoun boeing,david calhoun,dave calhoun,boeing CEO,airbus CEO,boeing airbus,airbus vs boeing,boeing vs airbus,boeing doomsday,boeing 737 groundings,boeing stock price,boeing settlement,boeing halt slowdown,january halt boeing,boeing max 8 crash,the boeing company,boeing earnings,boeing quarterly report,boeing hearings,boeing news today
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
I choose airlines that don’t have a MAX. I select flights not on price but aircraft type. I was a Boeing fan boy. Not anymore. Boeing puts profit b4 safety ( as does Alaskan it seems). That speaks volumes. No thanks.
same here, i would rather cancel my ticket than flying on Boeing,
Quality control in Airbus is way ahead.
Airbus is simply superior and better in everything, let it be design, Quality, comfort etc etc,
Yes I have heard from floor employees how they are supposed to check, cross check and recheck at least 3 times for every line.
Calhoun admits Boeing underestimated the A320NEO and screwed up trying to _catch_ up. Stuff we knew years ago.
If only they developed a new plane to compete directly… i’m sure with the right design and engines, that new plane would have killed the NEO
@@colestock9980 Stop talking sense and competence. You won't earn millions if you make intelligent thoughts and lead a company towarda success. You need to sound more narcissistic, less competent, even a bit dumb at times and always, and I mean ALWAYS, lie. Pretend that you care about safety. Pretend that you feel sorry for the lives lost. If you can do all that, you will have a great career ahead at Boeing.
Hope you can see the humor in my post. You are absolutely right. Boeing had it all, the technology, the opportunity, the resources, airlines asking for it and financial support from Wall Street, but they chose quick money and big loss rather than slow money and sustainable success.
@@LeTangKichiro oh i see all the humour 😂 let me rephrase that then: “our 737 max is and always has been the absolute safest aircraft ever put on the market and those crashes in late 2018 and early 2019 were just flukes and the door plug incident of 2024 is also just a fluke as there is absolutely nothing wrong with our planes and the way we build them! oh yeah the people that died… i’m sorry.
Oh and I forgot to mention that in about 10-15 years i’ll announce the 737 ultra which will mount engines the size of the GE90 somehow, but dont worry, even this plane which obviously will not fly the same WILL fly the same as all previous 737 variants so no additional training will be needed! There’ll be the ultra 8, 9, 10, and 11 which will be the same length as a 757-300 but much lower to the ground. Good luck getting that off the ground, pilots!
@@LeTangKichiroActually you have some of that backwards. Major 737 operators like SWA and AA wanted an upgraded 737 as fast and cheap as possible, just as they did with the NG. A clean sheet replacement would be years longer at far higher cost to purchase, retrain and recertify pilots.
Boeing rightly gets a lot of heat for the Max debacle, but big operators aren't completely innocent, they put a LOT of pressure on Boeing to respond to the NEO on the cheap.
1:15 - Boeing never dominated the aviation industry in the late 20th C. They were in competition with McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed-Martin and Convair from the '50s, up until 1997, when Boeing & MD merged. Airbus entered the market, decades before that merger left Boeing alone in the USA.
You clearly have a better grasp of the market and company history than the author of this. Boeing benefitted from it winning the DoD competition with the C-135 (over 730 USAF orders) from which the 707, wider fuselage, was developed. Even then you had the Douglas DC-8 and the Convair 880 which was much faster aircraft, along with the Vickers VC-10, all 4 engine competitors. The 747 was developed as a USAF Cargo/Transporter Aircraft but lost to the Lockheed Galaxy. Biggest mistake was the US Government allowing Boeing to cross subsidise its Commercial Aircraft from Inflated Military sales with the knowledge of the US Government across many administrations as concluded by WTO. If the USA had sense it would have supported Convair, then Lockheed and then McDonnell Douglas to remain, instead the problem was Boeing taking over (not a merger) McDonnell Douglas. As you say Airbus was already established at the time of the "merger" and indeed that was the White House justification of the Breach of Anti-Trust Law allowing Boeing Dominance. The SUDDEN and UNEXPECTED (to the USN) order for Extra F/A-18 Super Hornets and the Removal of Lockheed F-35C orders is a clear Breach of the WTO agreement. Airbus and the EU have that up their sleeve for future use. Boeing needs to be split
1. Boeing Commercial - sold to Lockheed
2. Boeing Military - compensation to Lockheed Martin for F-35C reduction
3. Boeing Space and Missiles, Rockets and Sundries which will collapse as unviable
As a European the market needed 3, or more major players, Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and Airbus. After Convair then Lockheed departure the USA panicked and now we have just 2 players = NOT HEALTHY.
It amazes me that instead of pushing the boundaries of the quality of their products, it's stepping back detrimental to the safety of crew and passengers.
NOT the same engineering company... NOT even close! Calhoun is a finance guy... saving money thru cost cutting is ALL he can do. Airbus is now in the drivers seat & Comac is licking their lips
Airbus is run by engineers thankfully
Stay safe folks. Fly Airbus👍
lose the background music or at least turn it down
Sorry, what did you say? I could hear myself think over the background music.
Y😮its hppd jearing your voice
MAX is like an athlete on steroids. It looks good, it performs well, but it has incurable deficiencies. As with athletes, the effects of the measures taken to install larger engines can be hidden by "treatments" but they cannot be eliminated.
Good analogy. I think of it as a resto-mod. A pimp-my-plane frankenproject taken one phase too far. They should have stopped at the NG.
Nah it does not look good with dwarfs legs and it doesn't fly well either
@@outermarker5801 Indeed. The 737NG should have been an interim before a new narrowbody following the discontinuation of the 757. It's not like they couldn't have seen a re-engined A320 series coming, especially considering the ground clearance is higher than the 737 series.
Calhoun worked at GE during the Jack Welch years ! He set the table for GE's downfall with Jeff Imelt in charge. GE is just an "empty suit" now. That's what happens when beancounters from the " good old boys club " get involved trading safety for profits .
So, Boeing has now decided to prioritize safety? Only now? Well, good to know.
There are two things that will save Boeing: insufficient Airbus' production capacity and enormous costs for Boeing-only airlines (like Alaska, Southwest...) to switch the whole fleet.
GET RID OF THE STUPID BACKGROUND MUSIC, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!
I think the music is better than the guys talk because how many times did we hear this.......until the next Boeing problem.
@@klausschumacher7126I turned it into a drinking game.
Also, get rid of the repetition of the content. Finally, actually say something that we did not already know.
They need to make a good airplane before anything else
If you remove your competitive thoughts you will find that you build a better product. Force on your employees strengths and your guidance to build a quality product. When you compete and feel like you’re losing you will do anything to get back on top.
A phrase I never understood early in my working life. Becoming a global leader is easy, staying a global leader is the hardest effort and expensive effort a company will face.
boeing is from a german person that live in usa. the real name was bönig
I still won't fly on a Max.
True😂
aged like wine, I consider never picking Boeing in general. At first it was safety issue but now I just lost any respect to the company. They don't care about customers, all they care is about profit. People die and they cut corners.
same as that - if its a boeing i aint going
You forgot the spontaneous combusting batteries too.
The facts that: 1 Boeing didn’t know a long haul narrow body demand existed 2. Didn’t/doesn’t believe the Max 8,9 needs its own tho rating, and pilots don’t need to be informed on MCAS 3. Not managing its parts and partners (Spirit Aviation) leads me to conclude that management and in particular upper management have their heads in an echo chamber with the lights turned off. Or maybe it’s just too big to manage…
"Trust comes on foot and goes by horse".
There is a great delay between mistrust and trusting again. Both from airlines and the public.
After 20 years of financial managers I think Boeing will not regain trust at time.
It's like Douglas/McDonnell Douglas never even existed.
You don't need a leader,you need a good designer!
The marked is big enough for both. But Boeing has one competitor : Boeing.
The trouble is, Calhoun has now resigned, and confidence in the Boeing brand simply wont return in a hurry if (as is wellknown) Boeing is allowed to be its own regulator or that the stock price remains the most important item. If those aren't changed, things will keep going wrong and ultimately Airbus will be competing with whatever comes out of China as the quality over quantity candidate (which is intense enough as it is).
When the door plug blew out it took the trust of airlines with it.
First comment here: I am a both Boeing and Airbus fan but I hope they don't compete, instead just like work together
Maybe Boeing should assemble the A320 series under licence (with Airbus oversight of course)?
@@FrewstonBooks I don't think even Airbus could repair the damage Boeing has done to its assembling process and staff. They would have to hire back so many people and Airbus spends months and years training their own workers for just one task. I don't think that would be beneficial to Airbus. Sure, they would be able to deliver more A320s but what's that worth of quality suffers. We are seeing with Boeing right now that it's impossible to just talk away the loss of trust.
That’s impossible
As long as Boeing keeps trying to make the too old 737 equal the A320, they will fail. 787 max 10 is following the same way to failure
the boeing 757 did things better then the a321xlr but Boeing got rid of the 757
They were getting old and weren’t getting that many orders they had to stop production but they could’ve upgraded tho with new engines and technology they didn’t unfortunately I guess cuz of the two fatal 737 max crashes😢
Its time to replace the CEO with a NEO....a New Executive Officer.
If the FAA had done its job there wouldn't be a Boeing today.
Boeing knew there will be max crash but they calculated it is still cheaper to pay for lawsuits by deceased families than improve safety. They knew they will not be prosecuted for murder in this country. All they care is how much bonus they get before the crash happened!!!
Background music please
The wildly fluctuating volume and horrendously loud background music is incredibly irritating.
They fired most of the experienced, quality employees and started with diversity hires.
What did they expect would happen?
You sound like the marketing department of Boeing!!!
Airbus is a threat so instead of spending more money to develop an all new plane to absolutely smash the a320 family, lets spend a couple pennies and stuff way too much tech into a 60 year old air frame…
They slept on that and that is a mistake that you can't catch up on. The time it takes for Boeing to develope a whole new plane (and make it safe and of good quality for a change), Airbus has already finished the next sales hit.
One word is what went wrong at Boeing. G R E E D
The truth is below covid chased a lot of senior employees out . Replaced by distracted younger employees... That's the bottom line
"distracted younger employees" - wow, what utter nonsense. Either way, if senior employees leave, it's up to management to hire the right people to replace them. But still, "distracted younger employees" is really disrespectful.
It's still "senior employees" (a.k.a. senior management) that has run the company into the ground (no pun intended).
This started happening in the 1990s. Boeing chased their good employees out. At this has nothing to do with age. Look at documentaries about Airbus. A lot of young workers. What matters is that they are well trained and are not punished for raising safety concerns or reporting a problem (the opposite should always be the case).
Boeing is no longer a manufacturer, it is a financial entity. Cutting cost
Was Boeing forced to be criminal by Airbus ?
Oh no how terrible oh no!
It's just that, you cancelled this (747), for THIS (737 max)?? THIS???
Nobody was buying 4 engines aircrafts anymore too expensive and inefficient for airlines to operate
Boeing is primarily an intellectual colossus and insofar as it is a manufacturing colossus "it is built on the intellect of those it can attract and keep", not just with decent salaries but with decent paid holidays, time away; to reflect upon what they're doing what they're designing (what corners the designers are painting themselves into) and what they're building. without these people Boeing is nothing. ..Background music is showbiz. Never ever the stuff of serious commercial updates and/or announcements.
Please talk to the point
The 737 Max brand is dead. Boeing would have to design a brand new aircraft to replace the 737 and do it well in order to recover. Right now I would not buy ticket with an airline flying an 737 Max.
This video is all pr bollocks. Boeing is in the mess its in through its own management system. Whistle blower after whistle blower has said how short cuts and sacking of key staff are responsible. Now we have a Captain from the pilots association, who flies the Max daily, telling continued faults all down to poor quality control and lack of engineering and design,
I believe him before the 'ceo' of Boeing! He has to fly the bloody things. Now the public is wising up, going via travel agents who provide a MAX free itinerary. The writing is on the wall in big letters.
Talk is cheap, I want to see action, Boeing will have a long road back to prove their quality, safety and Corporate responsibility to me as an Airline Customer. Until they do, I refuse to fly on any Boeing Aircraft manufactured after the B737-900. No Max, no Deamliner, no B777. Thankfully my hometown airline Delta has moved primarily to Airbus and they operate the A321, A330 and A350 to places I fly. No amount of Boeing PR will change my mind, actions speak louder .
Yeah, they will need at least a decade without crashes do to lack of quality but considering what has happened in the last 4 weeks alone they are still straight ahead on the wrong path, keep blaming everyone else for parts falling off or planes nose diving and injurying many people and now the brave whistleblower has been suicided conveniently after the first day of his testimoney against Boeing. Which is an invenstigation into whether Boeing adhered to the rules they had to follow after buying themselves out of criminal investigations for the Max mass murders by paying 2.5 billion. Looks like they did not improve safety though and instead got worse.
No, I don't like videos with stupid music. This makes it harder to hear what he says. In addition to music, the voice volume goes up and down through the video.
*_PLEASE: LET PEOPLE SELECT THEIR OWN MUSIC IF THEY WANT MUSIC AT ALL!_*
We have climate change issue and both emit co2
Combien de fois répétez-vous la même chis dans cette vidéo ? And by the way it is FAURY, not DORI or FORRAY !!!
Calhoun reminds me of an old political joke : How can you tell when a politician is lying, answer, It’s easy, their lips are moving. I doubt I’ll ever trust flying on a Boeing again, I’d rather live
Your attempt to produce a Hollywood production complete with musical score has failed.
Threw Boeing under the bus.
Pablum
Boeing deserves to go broke for one moving out of Seattle to making boy air parts in Asia. This is an American aircraft. It should be 100% built in America no to buying on my end. They go. Oh, well, they deserve it.
Poor planning and therefore implementation will eventually ground Boeing.
Blah, blah, blah.
Bullshit
.
.
.
.
.
Would never trust Boeing as long as their accountant’s are calling the shots instead of the engineers.