Tokina 11-18mm F2.8 Ultrawide Lens Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @bagery
    @bagery 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Yes, very late. I sold all my aps-c gear because of the lackluster offerings back then. I convinced myself to go entry level full-frame. It's nice to see how things change as I reconsider my options.

    • @KyurekiHana
      @KyurekiHana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Crop still provides plenty of resolution on most of the full frame lineup, and would allow you to use APS-C lenses with your current camera.

    • @frankfeng2701
      @frankfeng2701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. UWA is the biggest strength of full frame, e.g. one if my favorite 380g PZ 16-35 f/4 lens would be 11-24 f/2.8 on apsc that just doesn't exist on any apsc platform.

  • @sandeepraiphotography2111
    @sandeepraiphotography2111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    aaah... I remember having a Toking 11-17mm f2.8 during my Canon days. Brings back memories. Loved that lens.

  • @davect01
    @davect01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Monday's are always better with a new lens review ☺️

  • @0o_KASHIII_o0
    @0o_KASHIII_o0 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Im a big fan of your channel and have so far bought 3 lenses based on your reviews! Im now torn between this tokina and the new Sigma 10-18 and would love to see how you compare these two. Please make it happen!

    • @arunmaroli
      @arunmaroli 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sigma is 50% more where I live, how much does IQ differ?

  • @DennisMeetsWorld
    @DennisMeetsWorld 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tamron 11-20mm f2.8 all day, every day!!

    • @byronlp
      @byronlp ปีที่แล้ว

      Can I ask why? I’m torn between Tamron 11-20 and this Tokina 11-18

  • @britishrose9417
    @britishrose9417 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:40 The Tamron doesn't have stabilisation does it???

    • @skieran
      @skieran 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn't.

  • @CO8848_2
    @CO8848_2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The 11mm you are using is really distorting the image quite a bit, I wouldn't use it for vlogging myself.

  • @TrenchfootSalvador
    @TrenchfootSalvador 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok...how does it look in Full Frame & how far do i have to zoom to get rid of vignette?...

  • @danielchill3240
    @danielchill3240 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the review. You and your families are always awesome. 😊About this len, I got mine in an exhibition event in a special sale. Its range is a good match to my 18-105mm f4 G. It is approx. US$155 no tax. That I can not find a reason not to it home.😊

  • @osmantarar
    @osmantarar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sony 11mm you are using the distortion makes a footage look weird. Is there any lens in wide prime, zoom prime and zoom lens which looks straight?

  • @MetaPoglyad
    @MetaPoglyad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow this lens is the best on the market for aps-c. Thanks for the review

    • @p4ul.f708
      @p4ul.f708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Interesting opinion. In which regard other than being a bit shorter do you find it to be the best lens?
      Id take the Tamron 11-20 over it any day:
      - same weight
      - 2mm more focal length
      - bit sharper
      - ! weather sealing !

    • @MetaPoglyad
      @MetaPoglyad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@p4ul.f708 Yes, also a very interesting glass

    • @PatrickWithCamera
      @PatrickWithCamera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@p4ul.f708 Indeed, no idea why someone would chose tokina over tamron, also in my country tamron is cheaper than tokina, so 5-0 for tamron.

  • @shahedhasnat
    @shahedhasnat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    2:40 & 7:28 Tamron 11-20 F2.8 does not have image stabilization either.

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are correct, thinking about the 17-70 when recording this. Edited.

  • @lewiss66
    @lewiss66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello, Nice lens. Thanks for your video.
    Could you make a review of the Sony A7 IV with APSC lens ?

  • @jss455
    @jss455 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review! Thanks. I just bought a used one and am looking to do some astro photo work. Looking forward to more reviews! Oh, this lens will be used on an R7 with the adapter. I'm looking forward to some cool shots!

  • @gaetanobruno5889
    @gaetanobruno5889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    man, I've seen so many of your videos that I already feel like I know your family. haha huge thanks!

  • @dannoringer
    @dannoringer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review. Sounds like Tokina built an excellent lens that deserves a place in the market.

  • @joaomansano145
    @joaomansano145 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, if they made this lens for Canon, tô pair with the Sigma 18-35 1.8, would be the perfect line-up! Great video

    • @gabrielppol
      @gabrielppol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      mas eles fazem, só que pra Canon tem a 11-16 e a 11-20

  • @danielchill3240
    @danielchill3240 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had purchased a used 11mm f1.8 Sony before. I am not taking video but still, after 2 weeks, I found that it cannot be my walk around lens, it seems taken by the cell phone. While I am using a6000. On the other hand, 11-18mm zoom is more flexible to me. 😅

  • @akhiltjose5091
    @akhiltjose5091 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Matches with canon eos RP?

  • @HeikosGarage
    @HeikosGarage 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi there, I have seen your tokina 11-18 and the sigma 10-18 and your thoughts on the Tamron 11-20. How does the Tokina compare to the Sigma? I am in the market for a ultrawide zoom and would love to know how those three compare.
    Thanks

  • @antony2d
    @antony2d 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    De todos los lentes que mencionaste? Comparados con el laowa 9 mm? Estaba apunto de comprarme el laowa, me pusiste en duda 😐

  • @Jithmi_Al
    @Jithmi_Al 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, I'm looking to get this lens for architectureal photography. Do you reccomend this lens? In terms of sharpness?

  • @LukaszKlim-ge9xx
    @LukaszKlim-ge9xx ปีที่แล้ว

    Arthur what about Tokina Firin 20mm F2?

  • @Artem-pe3sb
    @Artem-pe3sb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Arthur, nice review!
    Form other reviews I noticed that in-camera distortion correction works incorrectly with this lens. Did you notice if EXIF data is fine? Just wonder how Sony works with 3rd parties apart of officially supported Tamrons and Sigmas

  • @robertpreston7760
    @robertpreston7760 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tokina 11/18 399.00 now Sigma 10/20 599.00 your thoughts? Thank you.

    • @1ShotNas
      @1ShotNas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m over here asking the same question

  • @beachdweller3378
    @beachdweller3378 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review!
    Been looking at variable wide angle lenses for my a6000 and really like the tamron 11-20 but its the priciest and doesnt have VXD. . The sony 10-18 has OSS but tends to be a little less clear than tamron. This tokina 11-18 has no OSS but is pretty sharp. I wonder if the sony with oss might perform better than tamron or tokina without built in image stabilization?
    Then i would like a lens with weather sealing. They all are great options yet are relatively priced the same. I am also leaning with the rokinon 12mm prime. Still undecided. Im looking to replace the sony 16 2.8 prime. I currently use a tamron 17-70 so perhaps a gap down to the samyang/rokinon 12mm prime wouldnt be bad? I just dont think over the past decade more than 10% of my shots were with the sony 16mm 2.8 with fisheye.

  • @kittparker4161
    @kittparker4161 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you test it on full frame? The Sony 10-18mm f4 is somewhat usable in the mid range and I was interested if this was too.

    • @arquivo225
      @arquivo225 ปีที่แล้ว

      Once i've tried a croped ultra wide lens (tamron 11-16mm) on a fullframe body and it worked without vignetting only at 16mm. On night shots I could go wider because it as dark at all. But all wide lenses made for crop sensors should be the same on fullframe. The advantage is that you can turn on the crop mode on your FF body. So yes this lens is interesting for FF users.

    • @RobertPeakDesign
      @RobertPeakDesign ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arquivo225 The Sony 10-18 works great on the FF. The range is not the same as other APC lenses. Effectively, I use the 10-18 at 12.5-18mm, so I loose the 11, but 12 is wide enough for me. The only reason to look at other lenses is to try and get the f2.8. However, I must say, I only shoot video with this lens.

  • @BIMLounge
    @BIMLounge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review as always. What park is that? Would be able to share? Thanks!

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pease Park!

  • @richbottarini86
    @richbottarini86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It is strange that Sony has not been really aggressive with it’s updates. The 10-20 f4 was long overdue and a 16-70 f4 is overdue. The Sony 11 replaced my Sigma 16 (Love the trio). The C sensor cameras are the great travel set up. Now, how about a Sony 7000 with 32 megapixel. I own the Sony a7 iv which is great, but sometimes, I use my wife’s a6600 (same battery) hiking and travel.

    • @HSNG10
      @HSNG10 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sony already launched the 1020F4 PZ and the 1655F2.8 lens.

    • @anonymousl5150
      @anonymousl5150 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sony already has very strong zoom lenses in that range. What they need is to replace their outdated 18-90 mm range primes because currently everyone has to use a Sigma prime for optimal results.

  • @SpuddyIRL
    @SpuddyIRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you had the zv-e10 would you want this over the tamron because it has the image stabilization for catalyst browse ??

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Neither this lens nor the Tamron have any optical stabilization. For catalyst browse you dont need the lens to have stabilization, it works better without it.

    • @SpuddyIRL
      @SpuddyIRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArthurR ohh, so which would you choose for vlogging between the two ?

  • @EricTheCleric93
    @EricTheCleric93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At this wide of an angle, I don't see why one would want a zoom over a prime lens with better clarity. I'd rather it just be 11mm - would probably be cheaper too.

    • @frankfeng2701
      @frankfeng2701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For me any zoom lens with less than 2x zoom can be replaced by a prime with one larger stop of aperture.

    • @arquivo225
      @arquivo225 ปีที่แล้ว

      I love wide angle lenses and for sure i'll by one zoom and one prime faster, or even two of them.

  • @VeryFunnyStuffs
    @VeryFunnyStuffs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Sorry but this lens recordings creates a strange distorted look. Might be my impression only…

    • @KyurekiHana
      @KyurekiHana 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not just you. I found it enlarged his forehead as he moved back and forth and it was very distracting.

    • @Club-Awesome
      @Club-Awesome 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@KyurekiHana He’s not recording the video with the Tokina.

    • @KyurekiHana
      @KyurekiHana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Club-Awesome he said he was recording with the Sony 11mm, which is too wide for a vlog style like this.

  • @thetechheart
    @thetechheart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro my budget is 650-700$ and I want to purchase a camera for both photography and videography. I love sony but can't find good deals. Please suggest me something good.

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look for an A6100 used.

    • @thetechheart
      @thetechheart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArthurR I am getting a new one in that budget should I go with it or try to find second hand a6400?

  • @fotoman76
    @fotoman76 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    tell me, what lens was this video shot on? the picture is caricaturally elongated.

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sony 11mm F1.8!

  • @antonoroz8814
    @antonoroz8814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about focus breathing? Is it terrible like in the Tamron 11-20?

    • @CarlBergsdorf
      @CarlBergsdorf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He shows focus breathing at 05:31

    • @antonoroz8814
      @antonoroz8814 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarlBergsdorf ty

  • @WealthUtopia
    @WealthUtopia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    🎉

  • @spost26
    @spost26 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking for a lens to shoot real estate photos/videos… not many options… I used to own Sony 10-18 and didn’t like it

    • @ArthurR
      @ArthurR  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The new 10-20 PZ is a lot better, just expensive. If you want the widest image thats still sharp, the Laowa 9mm manual is a good option. If you want AF, the Sony 10-20 PZ would be my 2nd choice.

    • @spost26
      @spost26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArthurR Thanks so much! Been a longtime viewer since Tech Mafia!

  • @tjwalkup7155
    @tjwalkup7155 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best part of this is your beautiful with and children! Looks like a good lens too.

  • @robertpreston7760
    @robertpreston7760 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry Sigma 10/18

  • @arwennstory1013
    @arwennstory1013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You look cartoonish with the lens you'r filming on but nice review though.