Omega Seamaster Diver 300M vs Oris Aquis Date Calibre 400 Luxury Dive Watch Review And Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2021
  • Contact Team Mosso for pricing and availability; Either I have it, or I can get it!
    Email: tmosso@thewatchbox.com
    Phone: 610-632-5307
    Shop all Oris watches: bit.ly/2vhOdTy
    Shop all Omega watches: bit.ly/2v2XXR9
    Oris SKU: 4479218
    Omega SKU: 4484523
    The Oris Aquis Date Calibre 400 01 400 7769 4154-07 8 22 09PEB is encased in 41.5mm of stainless steel surrounding a grey dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Oris Aquis Date Calibre 400 include hours, minutes, seconds and date. This Oris watch also measures 13.4mm in thickness and 48.2mm from lug-to-lug.
    The Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 210.30.42.20.06.001 dive watch is encased in 42mm of stainless steel surrounding a chrome color ceramic laser engraved wave dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Omega Seamaster Diver 300M diving watch include hours, minutes, seconds and date. This Omega watch also measures 13.7mm in thickness and 50mm from lug-to-lug.
    For complete details, watch the full review by Tim Mosso!
    Please subscribe to our channel for the best luxury watch reviews on TH-cam: th-cam.com/users/WatchBoxRevie...
    Visit our website at www.thewatchbox.com for the latest pre-owned luxury watch arrivals and industry-leading value in previously loved luxury timepieces.
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 201

  • @watchguy8537
    @watchguy8537 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Oris Aquis Caliber 400 does not come in a 39.5mm! This is a 41.5mm watch. There is a larger 43.5mm variant but it is only in blue (no black or green).

  • @jasonvaughan5128
    @jasonvaughan5128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I am a watch polisher. I’ve worked on hundreds of omega. A few oris. I’ve got an oris. I’ll leave it there.

  • @jeromef.5489
    @jeromef.5489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Own the SMP 300, and still have to experience Oris. Either way, both great for the price, but my heart belongs to the Omega 😎

  • @davidpratt1011
    @davidpratt1011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Just purchased the Oris Green dial version. It is very well made and gorgeous!

  • @robdavis1248
    @robdavis1248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Own the Omega and a friend has the Oris and I like them both the same but for different reasons, so they are both definitely winners for me.

  • @mendipfox1650
    @mendipfox1650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I nearly bought the SMP300 Chrome dial. So close, but ended up buying it’s bigger brother Chronograph with the same chrome dial. What a watch. It’s ridiculously beautiful and a technical marvel with the 9900 calibre. Bravo Omega.

  • @styx4947
    @styx4947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Another reason to love that 10 year warranty on the Oris is that for people new to, or considering watches, it gives the extra push to drop quartz and go mechanical by ensuring a 10 year maintenance free time piece. So Oris is doing it's bit for bringing people to the hobby

    • @tacuazinful
      @tacuazinful 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I want to purchase the Aquis Date, but when I buy a watch Is to keep it, not to Sell it, do you think Oris Is a reliable Brand for at least two generations?

    • @MrPINKFL0YD
      @MrPINKFL0YD 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​Undoubtedly. It's an old established brand and it's not going anywhere.

  • @MrRoyck10
    @MrRoyck10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a brilliant comparison by Tim, that good I reloaded this video and watched it again.

  • @thegraciefighter102
    @thegraciefighter102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Prefer the Oris - much cleaner look and a less obvious choice. Plus it doesn’t have a wart ! Good review as always

    • @randomnameindeed
      @randomnameindeed ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well said, I couldn't agree more!

    • @bryanryan4504
      @bryanryan4504 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Whatever..I'll be honest..if I was offered either watch, I'd take the omega every day of the week.

    • @N7Sound
      @N7Sound ปีที่แล้ว

      The Oris as a product (quality, materials, execution) is one step below.

    • @PeaterTheGreat
      @PeaterTheGreat ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@N7Sound unless, like me, you’d rather support a family owned independent watchmaker than be a drop in the bucket of swatch group. By that (my) view no corporate owned brand, like Omega, is worth supporting.

    • @xcomputronx
      @xcomputronx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PeaterTheGreat Support in pushing the 10 year warranty and service interval (although don't know how much $$$ that is) plus 5 days PR mechanism for a reasonable price.
      Also the Oris is a bit lighter. The valve part on the SM think is only annoying for most users and also de 300m an overkill, if you don't dive I think the Oris Aquis 100m is a better choice overall.

  • @kos3522
    @kos3522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    By owning both, i must say that are absolutely great and top quality watches!!
    Great pair and absolutely suitable for every occasion🖤👍🏻

  • @fendushi
    @fendushi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for reviewing these more obtainable watches Tim.

  • @McLaughter_
    @McLaughter_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Jingle and jangle” 😂 great start of ‘22 Tim!

  • @SinnMaster
    @SinnMaster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Love both of these! Tim - that Oris is definitely the 41.5mm size, not 39.5mm. They haven’t released the caliber 400 in a 39.5mm Aquis yet. Otherwise a great video!!

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi SinnMaster, we think you are correct! Once we confirm 100% we'll point out the mistake in the description.

    • @shuycg
      @shuycg ปีที่แล้ว

      @@the1916companywatchreviews just check Oris' site.

  • @nightstalker824
    @nightstalker824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I love the Omega, but that bracelet though. I don't care if it feels premium, it still looks so 90's.

    • @JupiterTarts
      @JupiterTarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Loved my SMP but the bracelet was definitely the biggest reason I sold. Didnt care for the traintracks and it was heavy enough to be mildly annoying.

  • @jolness1
    @jolness1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The omega on their site has been bumped to $5400 on a bracelet as of late last year. That was what made me pull the trigger before pricing went up elsewhere.

  • @everythingautomotiveeta5839
    @everythingautomotiveeta5839 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent overview

  • @ryanermoody999
    @ryanermoody999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For a summer, poolside watch, I was between the white dial Omega SMP on rubber strap and the 39.5 mm Aquis matt black dial on rubber strap. Oris one. Omega nil.

  • @theenavybluemonster
    @theenavybluemonster 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is my favorite version of the SMP. That chrome/blue dial is beautiful and unique. Wish the bracket tapered 20 to 18 and get rid of the diver’s extension.

  • @unlockyourmac
    @unlockyourmac 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "The co-axial escapement is the most exotic movement you can get for under 50k"
    *Spring Drive has entered the chat.*

    • @danielstrack964
      @danielstrack964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Spring drive isn't even a true mechanical movement.

    • @ugabrew
      @ugabrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He said “movement” and not “mechanical movement” so I think it’s fair to mention Spring Drive, which is unique, accurate, and pretty damn cool.

    • @davec3651
      @davec3651 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ugabrew he said "escapement" actually and I'm not sure if the SD braking glide wheel qualifies as an escapement, but it is cool. GS does have their new hi-beat escapement which is cool (though unproven) as well.

    • @danielstrack964
      @danielstrack964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@ugabrew My point is spring drive is not even mechanical with an escapement. If an over complicated quartz floats your boat then go for it. Its your money... Personally I wouldn't exactly call that technology exotic master craftsmanship.

  • @KB-vf4gz
    @KB-vf4gz ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible review. I thought you would go Oris in the beginning but why did you pick Aquis over diver 65 to compare against the Omega ? Thx

  • @jossdelage
    @jossdelage 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Omega 300M is one of my favorite watches of all time. As Tim mentions, the bezel is absolutely not grippy, especially with wet fingers.

  • @scoobers90
    @scoobers90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really wish Omega would bring back the midsize SMP.

  • @leeattwood5443
    @leeattwood5443 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HimTim happy new year

  • @taotao23730
    @taotao23730 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oris look better quality and the movement is a masterpiece ... already colectable watch and I am an owner of Oris calibre 400 . It's a watch VFM compare to Omega . It could be woth double of his money . Well done Oris.

  • @VVhiting
    @VVhiting 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is an unfair comparison. Both watches offer great value in both there price ranges but the omega is the clear winner. Anyone who says otherwise is dreaming.

    • @jollyrob
      @jollyrob 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I agree the Omega is clearly a better watch overall but as far as looks are concerned I'm on the fence with that one personally.

    • @basholtman4103
      @basholtman4103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agree on that omega wins in the movement department, but man that thing is ugly and looks like a childs toy. Also price wise 2k vs 5.5k not a real comparison, would pick the oris every single day.

    • @JupiterTarts
      @JupiterTarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've owned both the Aquis and the SMP. Was actually quite surprised how little the quality jump was from the $1000 I paid for the Oris to the $3500 I paid for the Omega. The SMP is an objectively better watch but I wouldn't say $2500 different. I don't have either anymore but I would easily buy an Oris again. Better looking bracelet, better value, lower profile.

    • @tyarnold4088
      @tyarnold4088 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I like the Oris more. Just don't like that Omega.

  • @michaelhawrylak6635
    @michaelhawrylak6635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Own this exact SMP. The date is too recessed and difficult to see if light is not directly shining in. The minute hand lum is terrible after 10 minutes. I knew all this before purchasing. Still love the watch.

  • @onefireoneway
    @onefireoneway 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Tim. My wrist width is 50mm. Do you think the SMP300 would fit on my wrist? I tried it at my local Omega boutique and it barely fits on the underside but too big on the upside.

  • @zstalker505
    @zstalker505 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have that exact Omega great value. Agreed about the solid feeling of the watch.

  • @ethandavis204
    @ethandavis204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For the pricepoint, the Oris wins.

    • @tyarnold4088
      @tyarnold4088 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By a lot.

  • @meson183
    @meson183 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    If I were to look at an SMP 300M, the one I would look at would be the black Ceramic/Titanium no date variant. It looks the bomb. But at the moment my first choice diver would be a BP FF 5015 on the bracelet or the GO SeaQ Panoramic Date BiColour.

    • @jolness1
      @jolness1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish the BP had even a little tool free microadjust (maybe like the VC overseas?) and it would be perfect. I still am mighty tempted but that’s my only really Mark against.

    • @almac9203
      @almac9203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jolness1 40mm sizing and a quick release bracelet system would be great.

    • @jolness1
      @jolness1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@almac9203 I have from a fairly reliable source that they are planning to update the 50 fathoms. I like the 5015 size, maybe 42mm but the lugs are so short that it wears smaller than the size suggests. I don’t swap straps (I’m a bracelet guy through and through) but as long as they do something that isn’t proprietary, I’m good with it. JLC has a very cool system that allows use with any springbar, that’s the sort of thing I’d be all for.

    • @almac9203
      @almac9203 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jolness1 I didn't mean they should reduce the size of the FF only they should sell a full sized version and a smaller unisex size. I like the quick change bracelet/strap system on the VC and would like something similar on the FF. Do you know when the FF will be updated? I hope it is this year!

  • @mjengineeringperform
    @mjengineeringperform 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shopped both, bought that exact omega

  • @scdevon
    @scdevon ปีที่แล้ว

    That Omega coaxial movement gets me every time. Like he said; nothing under $50k really comes close or maybe any price. It isn't just about power reserve and the Omega has plenty of reserve.

  • @devastator01ful
    @devastator01ful 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    omega's dial and movement and finishing
    oris's integrated tapering bracelet
    perfect watch

  • @Relo67
    @Relo67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Omega for me. Quality to price ratio is excellent👍🏼👍🏼

  • @jumboJetPilot
    @jumboJetPilot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I definitely like the green and burgundy dial versions of the Aquis. But that Seamaster is amazing!

  • @kyoukan91
    @kyoukan91 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its wild how much different opinions can be in the watch world. I personally thought the Omega Seamasters bracelet is about the lowest quality bracelet I've felt on a luxury watch. Yet you over here are comparing it to watches that are far and away superior in quality. Mindboggling.

  • @dustinhuman9118
    @dustinhuman9118 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    $5,400 vs. $3,500, keep that in mind.
    Integrated bracelets are much better if (and only if!) you intend to use the OEM bracelet. Otherwise, to me, the standard lug style--which obviously accommodates many more options--looks kind of goofy, to me, ultimately, after you've seen a well-executed (Oris) bracelet, with an integrated design, if you're using the factory bracelet. In fact, it seems a bit of a misstep. But nobody says that, because it's standard, and what Rolex, and Omega, and most brands go with. So Oris has the win here for me. I do wish there was a quick adjust, though, that would be nice.
    Then there's the helium escape valve. Which, let's be honest, is just pretentious. Unless you're an underwater welder, you're never going to use it. Omega, come off it, get rid of it, you don't need it. Don't know why you need to have that be what you hang your hat on.
    Aquis looks way better, IMO--not a fan of the current gen wave dial on the SMP. Love the fluted case, crown guard, hands and tapered bracelet on the Aquis. Wish there was a more matted/brushed option for both the bezel and bracelet.
    The SMP has the dual sided coating, which sucks.
    The SMP has the better movement, but again, it costs over 50% more. Check out a reveiw of the Calibre 400 movement by Prowatches. While pretty surface level in regards to the escapement, he does point out some innovative tech in the Oris pallet fork that Tim doesn't mention, besides its advances in anti-magnetism and power reserve.
    Can you tell I just bought the Aquis?

    • @richardsoos8902
      @richardsoos8902 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well done, and wear it in Good Health. I must confess, I own the Omega sku model shown and one reason was that I own a refined JLC and a speedy Omega. I now wanted something a little brutal and ugly as a different way to flex. Yes, the ego is a fragile thing. I wish I could feel the finish of the outer bezel where the diving minutes are inlaid on the ceramic on both as it would give me an appreciation of how far Oris have come.

    • @dustinhuman9118
      @dustinhuman9118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardsoos8902 Hey, thanks! I mean, maybe we can both agree, calling the SMP ugly is a stretch! I was a bit harsh on it. And everything I said on it was subjective--in fact, understandably never even considered--by most owners and admirers.
      The point to me is, whether or not Oris can be directly compared to the Omega, is that they've made a great watch and done enough to be push the bar/drive progress forward/compete/force Omega to respond and move forward.

    • @asterioslytsioulis4226
      @asterioslytsioulis4226 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @dustinhuman well I have the SMP shown here . And I definitely want an Aquis in blue. Other than the bezel it is far superior though. That bracelet is immaculate. And I love the helium escape valve . It is a trademark at this point of the SMP. Why do you need it ? Well do you need ISO divers certification? That oris in blue, though😍

  • @avoeeeee
    @avoeeeee ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review, only thing is Oris is 41.5mm, they don’t make Caliber 400 in 39.5mm.

  • @robg9574
    @robg9574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is “Extreme Handling” how often to rotor staffs break?

  • @jolness1
    @jolness1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ended up buying the SMP300 mainly because the lack of tool free quick adjust on the Oris. My wrist swells and shrinks so that’s a big feature on a bracelet for me.
    Hard to go wrong though for the money.

  • @rolandnyul
    @rolandnyul 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like both watches but I would prefer to buy the Oris with the Sellita movement.

  • @damiandunphy2821
    @damiandunphy2821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've bought the Omega this week, had I known about the Oris that 10 year warranty it would have been in with a shout!
    I was also tempted by Tudor which I found to be far better looking on wrist than online!
    I've inadvertently bought a Christopher Ward GMT too.
    When it turned up I really didn't like the GMT hand, but because I've resized the bracelet they will only refund 70%, so it looks like I'll be getting it back!

  • @YongJoonPaek
    @YongJoonPaek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Can you imagine if omega made a slimmed down no hev seamaster 300m prof. as a skin diver

  • @almeladze
    @almeladze 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Between this and Tim's comparo of a sub and aquis, I can tell that for Tim, it's Omega, then Oris, then the sub.

  • @michaelhanzal
    @michaelhanzal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Omega SMP 300M is now $5400 new on bracelet.

  • @esteemedwatches1768
    @esteemedwatches1768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The smp300 has a massive flaw: the minute hand has a skeleton hand with useful lume only at the end. Once the lume has faded only slightly and the minute hand is anywhere near an hour marker, you have no idea where the minute hand is. For a dive watch this is totally ridiculous form over function.

    • @danylo4670
      @danylo4670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Perhaps this was why the previous email generation of Seamaster had the minute hand not reaching out all the way to the minute markers

    • @diavalus
      @diavalus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      99.99% of the users won’t dive with this watch

    • @esteemedwatches1768
      @esteemedwatches1768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@diavalus yes I understand that but it IS manufactured as a high quality dive watch and with this flaw it just isn’t.

  • @saymyname218
    @saymyname218 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful Omega. If they got rid of the "helium escape boil".....I would buy one tomorrow.

  • @marcocastagnetti7086
    @marcocastagnetti7086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The SMP in white is next on my list, however I can't help wishing they would taper the braclet and if I had the choice of a clear case back or covered to reduce the height I think I would perfer a covered case back, next year will be the SMP 30th anniversary so you never know (omega are you listening).

    • @williamhahn265
      @williamhahn265 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have it on the bracelet. White is definitely the way to go. I find myself gazing at the dial a lot as it changes color depending on the light. You won't regret it.

    • @tommiel6740
      @tommiel6740 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Get it on rubber, it’s great

    • @williamhahn265
      @williamhahn265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tommiel6740 I was originally intending to get it on the rubber strap and after trying on both I decided on the bracelet. After trying an aftermarket rubber strap and not being impressed with it, I am going to go to my AD and get an Omega strap.I agree both are very nice. I've read that it's around $450. Hope it's worth it!

  • @me-cq7wv
    @me-cq7wv ปีที่แล้ว

    I still love my oris cal 4000 aka the Tudor Buster

  • @marceauratard6869
    @marceauratard6869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The only watch I miss is my 300M, It helped fund my blue side of the moon so I don't regret selling it but I do think about it..
    I like the chronograph version in this grey/blue colorway

    • @gyang333
      @gyang333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you get the regular BSOTM or the BSOTM with the aventurine dial?

    • @marceauratard6869
      @marceauratard6869 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gyang333 aventurine dial

  • @A.Campbell
    @A.Campbell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it wrong to want both?

  • @k_viss
    @k_viss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I loved owning the omega but tired of that chrome/blue color version for some reason. I may rebuy the black dial at some point in the future really should have done so from the get go

    • @eyeheartsushi2212
      @eyeheartsushi2212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Black dial should get more love on TH-cam.

    • @twautomech5338
      @twautomech5338 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ K Viss Same here, but i traded the chrome version for the blue one.

  • @fabfour289
    @fabfour289 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the Oris 39.5mm or 41.5mm?

  • @rogerb1964
    @rogerb1964 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have that SM, but with the blue rubber strap. Much better look than that metal bracelet which is nowhere near a Rolex Oyster in looks. Perfect if you want to leave the sub at home and not worry about the bracelet scratching or getting robbed

  • @2002chaiwa
    @2002chaiwa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i buy the oris a few days ago, its gonna be a very long 2 weeks before its arrival.

  • @robitobi9740
    @robitobi9740 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve got both and love both :-)

  • @kerryjgee
    @kerryjgee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    With Omega you are paying extra for the brand name. Is the Oris selling in ADs for that much?

  • @greenerick
    @greenerick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just one thing to say to Oris has hacking issues . Look it up on TH-cam.
    As for the Omega Seamaster prefer it on a rubber strap hate the bracelet.
    Most say great video 📹

    • @rogerb1964
      @rogerb1964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here, I have it on the blue rubber. Would never wear the metal bracelet

  • @yehoshuacirt8645
    @yehoshuacirt8645 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The extended warranty is probably more connected to marketing strategy and less to any emperic engineering advantage. Apparently many moderns can hit the 10 year mark and when not, you've already paid the service premium in the purchase price. At 10 years, the parts are probably dry and grinding at each other.

  • @kandelaarrotterdam
    @kandelaarrotterdam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No doubts that the Omega outperforms the Oris ( it even outperforms a submariner in terms of quality) Both watches give max bangs for bucks, so decision based on your your budget.

    • @gambini1598
      @gambini1598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you mean by outperforms? :-D Like showing the time better? I had both of them in hand and I would go for oris

    • @kandelaarrotterdam
      @kandelaarrotterdam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gambini1598 Maybe..: build quality and craftsmanship, higher (proven) accuracy due to METAS, quality of used materials? You can also go for a Seiko 5 which will have same specs for 98%, at this league the last 2% will count....

    • @gambini1598
      @gambini1598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kandelaarrotterdamEach other saw probably different video. He speaks all the pros for Oris and in the end says that Omega "feels" like a better watch. IDK in my humble opinion. I had both of them in my hands and Yeah Omega feels heftier but. that's it. Omega has a really ugly bracelet in comparison but a better clasp. Regarding accuracy, I doubt that there will be much difference (also said in the video that Oris has smaller tolerances than COSC)

    • @gambini1598
      @gambini1598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kandelaarrotterdam Seiko gives you 10-15 +/- (standard) seconds per day, there is no comparison with Omega or Oris

  • @ast453000
    @ast453000 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Again, I prefer the Oris. The Omega is just so dated looking to me. I feel like it was a new design like 30 years ago. And I never liked the skeletonized hands. Like the Sub, I think the Omega is a "better" watch, but I'd still go with the Oris, because it doesn't look like it was designed in the last century.

  • @fourlakes
    @fourlakes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Both are great watches. Personally I’d go with the Oris. But I think that particular Aquis is 41.5mm (though typical of all Aquis watches it wears smaller due to the lug design).

  • @Howling1978Hound
    @Howling1978Hound ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d buy the Oris

  • @maxwhiteley7667
    @maxwhiteley7667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    both would be compelling options if styled differently, as is neither competes with an older sub or blackbay 58

  • @ronintheamazon1492
    @ronintheamazon1492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Owned the smp300 and sold it as I was disappointed with the bracelet in terms of it’s comfort. Also, the bezel is certainly very difficult to grip with wet hands and the helium escape valve looks so goofy in it’s conical shape.
    It is also important to note that the smp300 has double-sided AR coating which can scratch on the outer saphire. I would consider trying the Oris as it costs less, depreciates less and has a thinner more comfortable profile.

    • @ugabrew
      @ugabrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Outer AR coating is the worst. It doesn’t matter which company is trying to pull it off… it scratches way too easily and defeats the purpose of having a sapphire crystal in the first place. I’ve had watches with no AR treatment, underside AR, and dual-sided AR. The difference is reflections never stood out for me, but the the scratches in my Omega’s outer AR coating always frustrate me.

  • @gmund317
    @gmund317 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Omega all day long. Have the blue dial version. I often pull up my sleeve just to take in its magnificence.

  • @barrelvisor
    @barrelvisor ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SMP for me. I’d always feel as though an Oris was a compromise and not an ultimate watch - more of a stepping stone along the way.
    Thanks Tim, great insights as always.

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As an Aquis owner and person who dislikes so much about the SMP (hands, He valve, bracelet, bezel, thickness) I know where my heart is but this is a great comparison for someone who doesn't have the reservations about the SMP that I do and it is a great watch, just hideous to me.

  • @BFit25
    @BFit25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    frankly from a design perspective I prefer the Oris. Oris is a bargain on the grey market. Omega design of the bracelet and HE valve is horrible IMO.

  • @ArmandoXGG
    @ArmandoXGG 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am an Omega fan but in this case I choose the Oris Aquis, looks bit more premium.

  • @dannyg6592
    @dannyg6592 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I considered a white dial SMP300M, but went with a Tudor BB58 instead. Love the Tudor, it has become my favorite watch in my collection. And it was $1600 less than the Omega. I like the Omega but it was too big and heavy for my wrist. I talked my best pal into buying the NTTD version and it wears a lot lighter than the steel. Never considered the Oris, I think it is unattractive. Happy New Year, Tim!

    • @mendipfox1650
      @mendipfox1650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You bought a BB58 over the SMP300 great white?! 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dannyg6592
      @dannyg6592 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mendipfox1650 Yes I did and I could not be happier with my decision. The "great white" is a nice looking watch, but it looked enormous on my wrist. The Tudor looks like a fine piece of men's jewelry, it glimmers and glistens and plays with the light. Plus it fits my 6.75" wrist perfectly. My pal bought the NTTD SMP300 and when we traded watches for a day, he told me he also preferred the Tudor. To each his own.

    • @JupiterTarts
      @JupiterTarts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dannyg6592 I don't blame you. I have the BB58 and sold my SMP when it came down between the two. The SMP feels like a true tool watch and was heavy enough to be a bit annoying. The BB58 is an elegant diver style watch that fits most situations.

  • @williamstalvey6920
    @williamstalvey6920 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oris looks better but Omega is better.
    Omega needs to fill in the lume on the hands!!!

  • @bradcrafton4929
    @bradcrafton4929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Omega, ORIS needs to be more transparent about the setting issues with the 400 series

    • @davefox8948
      @davefox8948 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is odd to me that Oris is being criticized so much for the need to center and relax the crown when setting the time. I’ve had many watches over the years from Seiko’s to a 1960’s era Rolex Submariner that would jump slightly when you pushed the crown in if you didn’t center the adjustment before pushing in the crown.
      In fact, I have two watches with ETA movements that require this attention to adjustment when setting the time. And yet I’ve never read a single criticism for any other watch for this relatively small anomaly

  • @ugabrew
    @ugabrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did Watchbox delete my comment?
    I’m pretty sure this Aquis is the 41.5mm and not the 39.5mm, since the Caliber 400 only comes in 41.5mm and 43.5mm. The 39.5mm case is currently only offered with the Selitta movement. Please correct me if I’m wrong, rather than deleting the comment since these videos are highly regarded and used as guides in the watch community.

    • @the1916companywatchreviews
      @the1916companywatchreviews  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi ugabrew - we think you are correct. The video description mentions 41.5mm but Tim mentions 39.5mm in the video. We'll put a correction in the listing description once we confirm the error. Thanks for pointing it out!
      Btw, we do not delete comments unless they are obscene or particularly aggressive attacks on other members of the community. We certainly wouldn't delete a comment that pointed out a mistake in our video, as we always want to get things right and leaving wrong information posted hurts our credibility. TH-cam will hide comments that it thinks are offensive and allow us to manually review them, but there are no comments from you on that list, so something must have happened with your original comment. It certainly wasn't intentional on our part. Thanks for contributing to the discourse!

    • @ugabrew
      @ugabrew 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the1916companywatchreviews I appreciate the response. It must have been some kind of technical issue. Thanks for all of the great content that you put out and for taking the time to respond here.

  • @PeaterTheGreat
    @PeaterTheGreat ปีที่แล้ว

    If I didn’t have a hatred of corporate ownership and the wart of the helium valve (which to me draws extra attention to desk diver reality) I would own an Omega. As it is though, I love my Aquis 400.

  • @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78
    @A_Dude_And_His_Watch78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These comparisons are great to see what more you get with Omega. I still think the Oris is better looking.

  • @WatchMeEDC
    @WatchMeEDC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow talk about a rapid move up market, Oris in a vs. video against Omega. I think the Nipple uh-err-umm… I mean escape valve is holding the Seamaster back 😬

  • @ErikS-
    @ErikS- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If this is the best midmarket dive watches, why dont we see the Tudor?

  • @motaz1975
    @motaz1975 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i'm not a fan of the smp300. i bought an aqua terra instead. i own the selitta based aquis also.

  • @paulstone9667
    @paulstone9667 ปีที่แล้ว

    You only open the Helium relief valve in the chamber after the bell run and not in the water! In Saturation diving, the change in pressure which would pop your watch is during decompression and for this, you will be in the chamber in the dry most likely in your bed, you just open the Helium relief and leave it open till your decompression is finish and step out the chamber. never open it in the water .

  • @newton2105
    @newton2105 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The styling of the Oris just leaves me cold for some reason. I just don’t find special looking. Not a huge fan of newer Seamasters either, but it’s objectively the better quality watch here, as it should be at a higher price. I personally think something like a Sinn U1 is a nice pick if you’re looking in the Oris price range or lower

    • @Nefville
      @Nefville 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you haven't the Oris is one of those watches you need to see in person to appreciate and even better on the wrist.

  • @JH-le4sd
    @JH-le4sd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "You'll want to set the bezel before the dive" 🤣

  • @entroheat
    @entroheat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I own a 2009 seamaster and man same looks and same bracelet as this one and it does not taper and although solid but ugly as it gets I bought the new aquis used like new for 1900 so oris wins based on tapered bracelet, green color and in house movement

  • @fmalik7736
    @fmalik7736 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s 41.5 and 435 not 39.5 as you have mentioned

  • @andrewts2067
    @andrewts2067 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe you'd like to take a look at Christopher Ward C60? It's more approachable than the Oris and looks like a strong competitor to the Sellita version: very nice bracelet, more complex case finishing, nice bezel feel, 5 year warranty.
    I'd love to see that shootout

  • @ryanelectra225
    @ryanelectra225 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Easy- I have both of them!

  • @vikcortes
    @vikcortes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Omega is a bigger brand than Oris,And seamaster is just one of the best watches out there,now if you give value to you money and need a quality product get Oris ,is just a better watch in many aspects. Caliber, single in house movement, independence, style,swiss made, materials.. the 400 caliber is just an Innovation in the history of horology..so yes i will go ORIS

  • @ToyHuntingGamers
    @ToyHuntingGamers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    In nearly every single respect.....Omega here.

  • @saodavi6267
    @saodavi6267 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That Omega is technically superior but horribly dated. It needs an updated bracelet and they should ditch the skeleton hands. It's a dive watch, it needs a lot of lume.

  • @Beck-Stein
    @Beck-Stein 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The omega wart at 10:00 is not necessary.

  • @shuycg
    @shuycg ปีที่แล้ว

    You could have selected the better looking blue variant of the Oris. But yeah, the Omega has the looks no matter way you put it. I like the Aquis 400. I'm waiting for a more interesting dial option. Ideally they also make it in a 39.5 version. They've put it in the Divers 40 and the movement measures 30mm. Don't know the exact internal measurements of the Aquis 39.5 case.

  • @theshamelesswatchchannel6815
    @theshamelesswatchchannel6815 ปีที่แล้ว

    The SMP is in dire need of an update.

  • @mikepaul2372
    @mikepaul2372 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Never liked the hands on the Seamaster thus never purchased one.

    • @jimlees8234
      @jimlees8234 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm really surprised I don't read this comment more often.

  • @1570CHRIS
    @1570CHRIS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omega all day but the Oris is nice.

  • @rogerb1964
    @rogerb1964 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only negatives are the large digits on the bezel, makes it look cheaper. And also the winding mechanism has very little resistance so youre not sure if you have the crown in the right position or it just spins endlessly. Rolex bezel and crown win that one. Power reserve of the SM isnt 55 hours either. You are lucky if you get 48

  • @powayimports4175
    @powayimports4175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have the omega. Held the Oris and it felt cheap imo. Not cheap like a 200.00 watch but just not worth 3,500. I have no regrets

    • @PoltergeistWorks
      @PoltergeistWorks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the lack of OMEGA logo I guess :) Btw I own an OMEGA and I've owned Oris and plan to own one again, they are doing amazing things these days and truly are one of the more interesting (and independant) brands, if you forget about the current hype train of Rolexville etc.

  • @giulianogiuliop7920
    @giulianogiuliop7920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omega wonderful

  • @costelloandsilke7321
    @costelloandsilke7321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice as the Oris is, the Omega is simply a better watch. Although you could say that the Omega case design is over-used across its range, it makes the Oris case look a little agricultural. To be fair, it's not that different to the shape used by IWC for the GST 2000. But whereas the IWC is a completely coherent design, pairing that case shape with a Rolex style bezel doesn't really work. It's a bit of reverse synergy where the whole is less than the sum of the parts. But the Oris is still a very nice watch for the money.

  • @seanmani9132
    @seanmani9132 ปีที่แล้ว

    You said 39.5mm for the ORIS. It's 41.5mm...

  • @IUsedToBeAPygmy
    @IUsedToBeAPygmy ปีที่แล้ว

    If only Oris stepped up their game with the bracelet clasp. The Oris clasp on my Divers 65 still looks and feels like it belongs on a $500 watch and the one in this video looks the same.