The new character sheet is an improvement but it desperately needs room for attack MAPs. Having your MAPs precalculated is a HUGE deal when getting new players into the game. It is a tiny thing that is a HUGE quality of life boon! With that being said I also think the new Bestiary should have the attack MAPs as well.
@@nullandvoid6486 You just need three spaces, for attack1/attack2/attack3+ You'd calculate it per weapon, so agile weapons would just have different numbers.
We also need a "rogue character sheet" for those classes that get fully twice as many skill feats as others. Because there are two of those classes, and that's a lot of extra feats.
If you don't have anything to put in "other" for that particular weapon, you could put it there. (I personally use a handwritten character sheet a lot of the time where I do just write like +6/+1/-4 or +6/+2/-2 in the line the attack stat, and I agree that it could be easier on the base character sheet)
Combining Aasimar, Tieflings, and other outsider-influenced ancestry into one is pretty smart. There's been a lot of bloat of similar ideas but different aesthetics.
I have to admit I was never as excited about 2E as I was when Pathfinder 1E came out. As a huge 3.5 fan, I was all over Pathfinder 1E, and my gaming group and I had some really amazing sessions playing it. 2E never really grabbed us the way 1E did. But after watching these preview videos, especially this one, I am as stoked for these remastered editions as I was when 1E first came out! Everything looks brilliant and well thought out, and since I am done with D&D 5E, I am ALL IN here. Great job guys, really looking forward to these books!
Love all the things that you are making for the Remaster project (including the whole Starfinder compatible). But please, consider a "Palyer Core 3" with all the missing Ancestries (Genikins, Atharketies, Varanas, Beastfolks, etc) and all the remaining classes (like the Magus, the Inventor or the Psychic) with the same treatment, otherwise, they would feel a bit odd. And again, the work you are doing is amazing, guys!
I hope there is a slight clean-up for core Activities to be simpler and clearer. Like if squeeze and tumble through could be condensed and combined, diplomacy and performance allowed for uses without needing skill feats, a changed help action, etc. The number one thing I want is for things to just be easier for new players to get to “the good part”.
Runic Body and Runic Weapon are doing the exact same thing; why have a separate spell for monks and minions vs everyone else? Why not just make a single spell affect both weapon and unarmed?
All the hard work the Paizo design team have put into this project will pay off (certainly I will be purchasing the Remaster - even though relatively new to PF2e and not that long back bought that rules set and supplements) - the game looks so much smoother (and improved) without throwing the baby out with the bathwater (no mean feat). I think also going forward the Golarion setting will become much more compelling because the encumbering baggage of the OGL is gone. Well done and I can't wait to bring the remaster to my gaming group - the passion you have for quality shines in your (hard) work.
I'll probably get over lack of sanctification to law/chaos eventually, but yeah I'm for some reason more fascinated by that than the traditional good vs evil x'D kinda found aeons vs proteans cooler than celestials vs fiends
41:40 The character sheet (still) has no visual connection between skills and attribute modifiers (formerly named ability modifiers). Other than that, it is far less intimidating and there is far more efficient use of space. Have an alternate sheet in Player Core 2 maybe? If they are near them instead of all part of the same alphabetical sort order that would be easier (Maybe even color-coded, with different luminance for the color-blind?). Then for skills without training you don't even have to write the number because it is already there (using any visual means of connection), and when leveling you don't have to search for each number then go back to the skill you were on (confusing, long, error-prone, easy to lose your place if changing modifiers on later levels unless you erase all corresponding numbers first).
LINDA! Leshies are core now! (back in the beginning of 2e James joked with Linda -in the developer commentary video for AoA AP that in 6e Leshies would be Core ancestries)
I know it's a strange place to ask, but the Core Preview has no entry for Frostbite, and it's mentioned in Rage of Elements. Is there any way that could be remedied?
The new Arcane Curriculums =/= the old Magic schools. Sin Magic is basically going to have to be completely reworked because they don't work with the new Curriculums.
@@xdragoonzero0 well, they did say that the way that they were doing the new curriculums would let them add on more in the future, maybe if they do another Thassolonian or Runelords AP they'll introduce the Seven Schools of Sin?
It's cool how so many things from my homebrew multiverse are syncing up in the remaster/rage of elements! Lol...My primordial chaos realm is known as Xyphx, aka "the Churn", and my Nephilim were an ancient extinct "cousin" of the aasimar who now are only seen when they get resurrected through necromantic magicks! It'd be cool to introduce a small colony of Nephilim descendants (devolved from their previous form..in my world they were the offspring from the union of a mortal and an Empyrean) on an arkship that, after a few millennia, returns to their home celestial system. Oh, and Starfinder 2e accounts for the bi-solar system with advanced technology and a fear of magic!
We are from mexico, and we have less than a year playing. Our English is not that good to understanding everything. That’s one of the reason we play Pathfinder. And I want to ask if you are going to translate all this content to Spanish. And I saw that sorcerers is not longer in the core manual :( I only play sorceress and summoner
I like that the remaster is occurring. I think having all 'common' rarity in the first Player Core would make for an easier experience and would support game play better where a GM could easily say all you need is the Player Core and everything is there. With this publishing schedule and method, the actual core classes are split between two books, so in the end, to play actual core classes players will need to purchase two books. Core 2 could have included only “uncommon and rare” rarity.
@@9652769 yes tracking only GnG classes are uncommon, I am talking about much more than just the classes though, such as the ancestries, backgrounds, equipment, spells, feats, and so on.
Reassuring to see that the Schools of Battle Magic and the Boundary will have 3 level 1 spell slots at higher levels instead of 4, unless they beg their GM for a different spell.
Will there be any way to increase the number of spells in one's divine font? My Cloistered Cleric is high charisma cause I want her to be, and at level 5 will already have 5 font slots, and 6 font slots at level 15. So capping it at four for Cloistered Clerics is a pretty major nerf here.
Could you please, PLEASE, fix item DC? They should all scale based on the Standard DC table, and all items made with infused reagents should use class/spell DC. It's the main house rule I always use and it's SO MUCH BETTER. It improves quality of life dramatically (you don't need to keep looking up items every single time you want to use them, and they remain useful for more than one level of gameplay) without affecting game balance at all (the effects don't change, so they still aren't particularly great as levels increase). You could even put a small box labelled *Item Save DC* on the first page of the character sheet for even easier reference. This is the one change I've asked for since the 2e playtest and the one thing you've constantly ignored, even though it's objectively superior to what exists now. The only thing it affects negatively is the Toxicologist, but let's be honest here, that research field is an absolute pile of hot shyte and should be removed from the game entirely. Also, why do Celestial Magic and Fiendish Magic have different prerequisites? The former states, "... or another lineage feat associated with celestials," but the latter doesn't have something similar with regards to fiends. The first PF2e books had similar inconsistencies all over the place, so please comb through this release as best you can to try to avoid them for the remaster. I'd honestly suggest just releasing the books as PDFs to the community so we can help. Crowdsourcing is really useful with this kind of thing. Thank you!
Till no official Bugs Bunny ancestry, you have three option: Re-theme ratfolk: choose rabbit-y feats Beastfolk versatile heritage And next year comes the awakend animal ancestry in the wild theme book :)
Not enough room for Lore on the new character sheet... almost every one of my PFS characters has 3 Lore skills thanks to the freebies, and people playing lore master type characters often have 5-6.
The Remaster is only covering options in the Core Rulebook and Advanced Players Guide, Dark Archive is still itself, with some errata eventually expected to hit for minor adjustments, Thaum should be essentially unchanged.
The Core Rulebook and Advanced Player's Guide books are being remastered,. The classes in the other rulebooks continue unchained at this time. They are not deleted.
26:38 Nooooooooooo! Wortwitch isn't on the Witch feat list! T•T I have a Leshy Witch with the Wild patron (whose her grandmother) and, as her 4th level feat (because 2nd level is used for Flexible Spellcasting Preparation archetype,) she has Wortwitch - revealing that her familiar was actually her older brother! (So, basically, Leshy Witch with a Leshy Familiar and Leshy Patron) But, if Wortwitch doesn't exist... That means Paprika can't either! Unless... Maybe you don't have to be a Leaf Order Druid or a Witch with Wortwitch to have a Leshy Familiar??? (Anyways, these Patron Abilities look phenomenal! Super excited!)
I like a lot of the changes but despise the removal of alignment, it may be something where it’s not extremely necessary for players but as a GM it’s great to know what monsters and npcs alignments are so you can base their actions and personalities off of that so you can run them effectively when not creating your own in custom content. It does also seem to neuter the theme of divine characters in my opinion. This look at the book has improved my disposition on it though and I’m not as against it, but there are still a tremendous amount of unnecessary changes.
@cold12u I think especially for cloistered cleric the average cleric will just hard invest into dex wis and con and sit with those 3 forever with one of the others dragged along each ability boost
This would've been the perfect place to get rid of the stupid bulk system and revert to item weight, but it looks like we're still gonna be stuck with bulk.
Regarding the press trait, I see in your preview on page 143, that there are still two feats that have it. Was press removed or just put on fewer feats?
Maybe a hot take, but if yall have time it might be a good idea to remove the pet feat. Basically any GM i know would give you a pet of the sort described in the feat at absolutely no cost. The ones that wouldn't want a pet in the party are going to ban the feat anyway, literally all this is going to do is eat up a feat choice at tables with the kinds of DMs who would have allowed pets for free before but want to play it raw now. This feat is a net negative.
@@sirspate It's pronounced "neh-feel-eem" in Hebrew. (נפילים) People have been pronouncing Hebrew masculine plurals with a soft /I/ for such a long time due to the spelling of how Hebrew transliteration works to the point that some consider it the way to anglicize it (especially since most English speakers have learned these words through reading and not hearing).
I love all the innovations that the remaster is bringing. However, I can't say I'm a fan of the new art style. It seemed to me that it has moved away from Pathfinder's unique style and become more generic.
Love the new Changes to the classes to get revamped & improved upon & I understand all the new changes had to be implemented quickly because of Wizards of the Coast and their "Wonderful Nonsense", However while i know this is just a preview the Witch from what I Can Gather from this preview is still just the same as before Witch in the original book. 1st. The Witch gets too many HEX focus spells & not enough focus points for those spells so maybe make it exclusive to the witch that can get more focus points than anyone else & cast more than one hex because the current focus spells I'm sorry to say are quite awful. I'm not asking for overpowered or broken I've heard the tales of the slumber witch from 1e pathfinder. Thats not what I'm looking for. 2nd. No matter how many times you hand players the "eldritch nails" so they can make claw attacks in melee combat with magic spells they won't do it. it's not a marshal class they have nothing to survive within melee combat instead make a subclass called "Patron Warrior" where it makes the witch class a marshal warrior like the Warpreist or a magus then the "eldritch nails" word work otherwise it's still a trap feat that doesn't help the witch in anyway. 3rd. The Familiar is a scout, or an extra spellcaster not a marshal, it's also the witches Spell book. I have no desire to sacrifice my familiar with 1 unique ability over other familiars for a flanker that still can't survive against an enemy more than a round. Instead give the familiar three unique abilities that no other familiar gets & unique familiars that no one else can have even with the familiar master archetype/dedication. giving the familiar a far more useful role or give the Witch more powerful familiars if you want and what happens if you enter a place where conjuration doesn't work and your familiar is dead you don't get your spells back until you leave that area. 4th. In PFS 2e Society play I'm the only one who picks a Witch (one of my favorites), because a bard is a much better choice & I can't replace any of the core four classes with the witch (Fighter, Rouge, Cleric, Wizard) at best it's a reasonable sixth character at worst seventh in a party. While the bard is the perfect fifth wheel character, if you want the witch to be useful make it a fifth wheel character like the bard & apply that to the other classes that aren't the core four classes for balancing purposes. Please explain how the witch is better than the wizard in scenarios, modules or AP's with four people & if your answering honesty it isn't and that's the problem, you'd never choose the witch over the wizard. I love the classes and the ideas are cool but perhaps you should let the reworked classes be play tested before you fully rework them other than that i have to say on the top list of awesome the knife & cauldron reworks that was baller definitely keep that in the witch, I don't know way you guys didn't put that in the first place that was sick. Overall, you guys are doing great keep up the amazing work.
@@FlamingKumquat It's just bad scaling. If someone is playing something like a trident+shield melee Warpriest who worships Erastil and defends settlements against monsters just becomes objectively worse than an identical build that worships Gozreh.
No summoner remaster, huh? Well, no reason to hesitate playing one, I suppose. All this looks pretty exciting! If I keep GMing (def keep playing) I might have less house rules ❤
![โฮ่ง! (SUGOI) - LYKN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nFp4zjAARFs/mqdefault.jpg)
The new character sheet is an improvement but it desperately needs room for attack MAPs. Having your MAPs precalculated is a HUGE deal when getting new players into the game. It is a tiny thing that is a HUGE quality of life boon!
With that being said I also think the new Bestiary should have the attack MAPs as well.
I could see that being tricky to implement when you consider attacking with things that have the agile trait or cases where one plays a flurry ranger.
@@nullandvoid6486 You just need three spaces, for attack1/attack2/attack3+
You'd calculate it per weapon, so agile weapons would just have different numbers.
We also need a "rogue character sheet" for those classes that get fully twice as many skill feats as others. Because there are two of those classes, and that's a lot of extra feats.
If you don't have anything to put in "other" for that particular weapon, you could put it there. (I personally use a handwritten character sheet a lot of the time where I do just write like +6/+1/-4 or +6/+2/-2 in the line the attack stat, and I agree that it could be easier on the base character sheet)
@@nullandvoid6486...or backswing, which lowers the MAP by 1 if your last swing WITH THAT WEAPON misses.
Character sheet is a big improvement!
Timestamp?
41:51
@@theadventuresguild6514 41:54
As a cleric I find it a little lacking, it should have space for deity/anathema/sanctification.
@@cold12u Ahhhh that's true, since alignment is being removed
Combining Aasimar, Tieflings, and other outsider-influenced ancestry into one is pretty smart. There's been a lot of bloat of similar ideas but different aesthetics.
Kudos to these folks for highlighting their learning process through this.
I have to admit I was never as excited about 2E as I was when Pathfinder 1E came out. As a huge 3.5 fan, I was all over Pathfinder 1E, and my gaming group and I had some really amazing sessions playing it. 2E never really grabbed us the way 1E did. But after watching these preview videos, especially this one, I am as stoked for these remastered editions as I was when 1E first came out! Everything looks brilliant and well thought out, and since I am done with D&D 5E, I am ALL IN here. Great job guys, really looking forward to these books!
Love all the things that you are making for the Remaster project (including the whole Starfinder compatible). But please, consider a "Palyer Core 3" with all the missing Ancestries (Genikins, Atharketies, Varanas, Beastfolks, etc) and all the remaining classes (like the Magus, the Inventor or the Psychic) with the same treatment, otherwise, they would feel a bit odd. And again, the work you are doing is amazing, guys!
Not a bad idea.
I second that idea. As far as i'm concerned . . . the more books the better. lol
I hope they don't do that. In my opinion, just keep the thematic books with their respective contents and release an errata instead.
@@jeffersonromao4999yeah SoM and G&G can get an updated edition, not a new book.
@@brianlane723 Ummm . . . I'm pretty sure a updated edition IS a new book. lol
I love the irony of paizo keeping the spirit of what teiflings and assimar are supposed to be more than the source company that did them before
No info about new Recall Knowledge ;(
I even rolled for it, but I guess I crit failed 😭
Roll again, I'm sure you'll get something next time!
I love the green color you're using in the books!!! :D Also the content is awesome!
Agreed, nice touch. 👍
Agreed. Now it won't burn my eyes in the Pdf
Very clever idea with the Nephilim and all the Outsider-touched characters. Hope that the Geniekin could have the same treatment at some point!
I hope there is a slight clean-up for core Activities to be simpler and clearer. Like if squeeze and tumble through could be condensed and combined, diplomacy and performance allowed for uses without needing skill feats, a changed help action, etc.
The number one thing I want is for things to just be easier for new players to get to “the good part”.
Runic Body and Runic Weapon are doing the exact same thing; why have a separate spell for monks and minions vs everyone else? Why not just make a single spell affect both weapon and unarmed?
I agree with this just call it runic enhancement and done.
Because strategically it would become a must at most pcs
For those unsure of the remaster:
This change is no different than the Unchained Material in first edition. Use it if you want, we can have it all 😆
There's a typo on Cleanse Affliction; it has the two-action logo and also Cast: 1 minute.
Noticed the absence of Power Attack on that Fighter preview.
Will it be posible to download / find a printable version of the new sheet? It is so much better ❤🎉
More passive benefits to hexes and witch familiars is exactly what witches needed. So glad these were introduced!
Why is "cloistered cleric" coloured burgundy, and "warpriest" coloured green?
All the hard work the Paizo design team have put into this project will pay off (certainly I will be purchasing the Remaster - even though relatively new to PF2e and not that long back bought that rules set and supplements) - the game looks so much smoother (and improved) without throwing the baby out with the bathwater (no mean feat). I think also going forward the Golarion setting will become much more compelling because the encumbering baggage of the OGL is gone. Well done and I can't wait to bring the remaster to my gaming group - the passion you have for quality shines in your (hard) work.
I'll probably get over lack of sanctification to law/chaos eventually, but yeah I'm for some reason more fascinated by that than the traditional good vs evil x'D kinda found aeons vs proteans cooler than celestials vs fiends
41:40 The character sheet (still) has no visual connection between skills and attribute modifiers (formerly named ability modifiers). Other than that, it is far less intimidating and there is far more efficient use of space. Have an alternate sheet in Player Core 2 maybe? If they are near them instead of all part of the same alphabetical sort order that would be easier (Maybe even color-coded, with different luminance for the color-blind?). Then for skills without training you don't even have to write the number because it is already there (using any visual means of connection), and when leveling you don't have to search for each number then go back to the skill you were on (confusing, long, error-prone, easy to lose your place if changing modifiers on later levels unless you erase all corresponding numbers first).
I wonder, though they are rare, will the Baba yaga, pacts, and Mosquito witch patrons be updated somewhere with the new additions as well.
Will the subclass formatting be improved?
For example, the Alchemist and Champion in CRB split their subclass details up in an annoying way.
The homonculus 😍
Witch changes are awesome! Needed that mechanichal flavor.
Great character sheet, excited to use it.
pet feat. 100% not optimal. 100% awesome!
LINDA! Leshies are core now! (back in the beginning of 2e James joked with Linda -in the developer commentary video for AoA AP that in 6e Leshies would be Core ancestries)
Staying ahead of the curve 😂
Great video guys! When will we be able to print the new character sheets?
This! +
Soon...
@@JasonBulmahn That would be nice!
Disappointed that Dual Class and Ancestry Paragon aren't pulled forward. Yes, they are still available in GMG. But newer players will not know that.
Same with Stamina
I know it's a strange place to ask, but the Core Preview has no entry for Frostbite, and it's mentioned in Rage of Elements. Is there any way that could be remedied?
I believe if it's in rage of elements that is the updated version
A note on the art that has been previewed - a distinct lack of AI graphics. :)
Huh, when it comes to the new magic schools, i wonder how New Thassolon and the Runelords school of magic will vibe with the new changes.
The new Arcane Curriculums =/= the old Magic schools. Sin Magic is basically going to have to be completely reworked because they don't work with the new Curriculums.
@@xdragoonzero0 well, they did say that the way that they were doing the new curriculums would let them add on more in the future, maybe if they do another Thassolonian or Runelords AP they'll introduce the Seven Schools of Sin?
It's cool how so many things from my homebrew multiverse are syncing up in the remaster/rage of elements! Lol...My primordial chaos realm is known as Xyphx, aka "the Churn", and my Nephilim were an ancient extinct "cousin" of the aasimar who now are only seen when they get resurrected through necromantic magicks! It'd be cool to introduce a small colony of Nephilim descendants (devolved from their previous form..in my world they were the offspring from the union of a mortal and an Empyrean) on an arkship that, after a few millennia, returns to their home celestial system. Oh, and Starfinder 2e accounts for the bi-solar system with advanced technology and a fear of magic!
We are from mexico, and we have less than a year playing. Our English is not that good to understanding everything. That’s one of the reason we play Pathfinder. And I want to ask if you are going to translate all this content to Spanish.
And I saw that sorcerers is not longer in the core manual :(
I only play sorceress and summoner
I like that the remaster is occurring. I think having all 'common' rarity in the first Player Core would make for an easier experience and would support game play better where a GM could easily say all you need is the Player Core and everything is there. With this publishing schedule and method, the actual core classes are split between two books, so in the end, to play actual core classes players will need to purchase two books. Core 2 could have included only “uncommon and rare” rarity.
... Do you know that the only uncommon classes are in the Gears and Gun?
@@9652769 yes tracking only GnG classes are uncommon, I am talking about much more than just the classes though, such as the ancestries, backgrounds, equipment, spells, feats, and so on.
Reassuring to see that the Schools of Battle Magic and the Boundary will have 3 level 1 spell slots at higher levels instead of 4, unless they beg their GM for a different spell.
Not sure what you mean. Every curriculum grants +1 slot per spell rank. Do you mean that none of their 1st rank spells are useful at higher levels?
No Ancestry Paragon variant rule?
Seems odd Pine Leshy didn't make it in...
Did they remove Baba Yaga as a witch patron...? That was my favorite patron for my wheelchair witch...
They removed it as being called Baba Yaga, but check out silence in the Snow, I believe it is the same but with the familiars new special ability
And baba yaga was from Legends book. It wasn't there at the start.
While you're at it, PLEASE fix Chirurgeon Alchemist!
Will there be any way to increase the number of spells in one's divine font? My Cloistered Cleric is high charisma cause I want her to be, and at level 5 will already have 5 font slots, and 6 font slots at level 15. So capping it at four for Cloistered Clerics is a pretty major nerf here.
It's 4, 5, and 6 at the same (or close to?) the same levels you could increase your charisma.
I'm personally wondering how the bard's been changed.
Could you please, PLEASE, fix item DC? They should all scale based on the Standard DC table, and all items made with infused reagents should use class/spell DC. It's the main house rule I always use and it's SO MUCH BETTER. It improves quality of life dramatically (you don't need to keep looking up items every single time you want to use them, and they remain useful for more than one level of gameplay) without affecting game balance at all (the effects don't change, so they still aren't particularly great as levels increase). You could even put a small box labelled *Item Save DC* on the first page of the character sheet for even easier reference. This is the one change I've asked for since the 2e playtest and the one thing you've constantly ignored, even though it's objectively superior to what exists now.
The only thing it affects negatively is the Toxicologist, but let's be honest here, that research field is an absolute pile of hot shyte and should be removed from the game entirely.
Also, why do Celestial Magic and Fiendish Magic have different prerequisites? The former states, "... or another lineage feat associated with celestials," but the latter doesn't have something similar with regards to fiends. The first PF2e books had similar inconsistencies all over the place, so please comb through this release as best you can to try to avoid them for the remaster. I'd honestly suggest just releasing the books as PDFs to the community so we can help. Crowdsourcing is really useful with this kind of thing.
Thank you!
This, please!! I *HATE* how each item has its own DC and this sounds like such a fantastic fix. I'm absolutely adopting this at my table.
Sounds cool
it's the end of dual class?
Very cool 😎 any chance you will add a rabbitfolk ancestry in a future book ?
Till no official Bugs Bunny ancestry, you have three option:
Re-theme ratfolk: choose rabbit-y feats
Beastfolk versatile heritage
And next year comes the awakend animal ancestry in the wild theme book :)
For a future character I'm determined to homebrew a rabbit ancestry and steal feats like ricocheting leap
Not enough room for Lore on the new character sheet... almost every one of my PFS characters has 3 Lore skills thanks to the freebies, and people playing lore master type characters often have 5-6.
Not sure I like some later Nephilim feats requiring a Lineage feat, especially when their Lineage options are so boring.
Awesome! I vote for the Goblin School of Pryomance and Frementation.
Question: As far as I can see there is no Thaumaturge in Player Book 1 or 2 annouced. Is he getting deleted?
The Remaster is only covering options in the Core Rulebook and Advanced Players Guide, Dark Archive is still itself, with some errata eventually expected to hit for minor adjustments, Thaum should be essentially unchanged.
No classes can get "deleted" as a result of the remaster.
The Core Rulebook and Advanced Player's Guide books are being remastered,. The classes in the other rulebooks continue unchained at this time. They are not deleted.
I'm ready. Take my money!!😂
26:38 Nooooooooooo! Wortwitch isn't on the Witch feat list! T•T
I have a Leshy Witch with the Wild patron (whose her grandmother) and, as her 4th level feat (because 2nd level is used for Flexible Spellcasting Preparation archetype,) she has Wortwitch - revealing that her familiar was actually her older brother! (So, basically, Leshy Witch with a Leshy Familiar and Leshy Patron)
But, if Wortwitch doesn't exist... That means Paprika can't either! Unless... Maybe you don't have to be a Leaf Order Druid or a Witch with Wortwitch to have a Leshy Familiar???
(Anyways, these Patron Abilities look phenomenal! Super excited!)
Love!
Should I be expecting to see Pathfinder 2.3 edition in 2027?
I like a lot of the changes but despise the removal of alignment, it may be something where it’s not extremely necessary for players but as a GM it’s great to know what monsters and npcs alignments are so you can base their actions and personalities off of that so you can run them effectively when not creating your own in custom content. It does also seem to neuter the theme of divine characters in my opinion. This look at the book has improved my disposition on it though and I’m not as against it, but there are still a tremendous amount of unnecessary changes.
Can we assume that the versetail heritages of aphorite and ganzi will come in the second wave of remastered books?
Is Cleanse Affliction 2 Actions cast or 1 Minute cast? I don't think i get it.
Wasn't the tongue the oracle?
Fungus the goblin was the alchemist or did that change?
41:47 remastered sheet
oh hey they correctly pronounced Nephilim phonetically :D
Thought they were phasing out the knoll name?
They have their own name for what were gnolls.
I'm sad for the alchemist going away, but I'm happy for the witch to be core now!
At least Alchemist will be in Player Core 2 ❤
From the image at 57:48, looks like alchemist will be in Player Core 2
I'm sad to see cleric losing charisma benefits. This promotes 0 charisma investment for a cleric
Yeah, I like the idea of having a secondary stat as a cleric.
@cold12u I think especially for cloistered cleric the average cleric will just hard invest into dex wis and con and sit with those 3 forever with one of the others dragged along each ability boost
Maybe we get a "preacher" class in the next books 😮 that would make it have much better flavour around charisma. A bard for the divine?
This would've been the perfect place to get rid of the stupid bulk system and revert to item weight, but it looks like we're still gonna be stuck with bulk.
Regarding the press trait, I see in your preview on page 143, that there are still two feats that have it. Was press removed or just put on fewer feats?
Press is still being used I think
Open was removed. I don't believe Press was.
Open was the trait that's removed, Press is still an active trait used in pretty much all the same places.
So are we gonna have to buy all the books over again like we do with starfinder?
No. Don't buy any, buy them all, or something in between. You don't need anything if you don't want it.
Oh god, common Leshies?
All because of the OGL debacle. :/
Maybe a hot take, but if yall have time it might be a good idea to remove the pet feat. Basically any GM i know would give you a pet of the sort described in the feat at absolutely no cost. The ones that wouldn't want a pet in the party are going to ban the feat anyway, literally all this is going to do is eat up a feat choice at tables with the kinds of DMs who would have allowed pets for free before but want to play it raw now. This feat is a net negative.
Vitality Comment!
cool
School of Prothean Form, please change to School of Biomancy.
Thank you! Finally pronounced nephilim properly.
So it's different from the Hebrew pronunciation, or is the wikipedia page's pronunciation guide wrong?
@@sirspate It's pronounced "neh-feel-eem" in Hebrew. (נפילים)
People have been pronouncing Hebrew masculine plurals with a soft /I/ for such a long time due to the spelling of how Hebrew transliteration works to the point that some consider it the way to anglicize it (especially since most English speakers have learned these words through reading and not hearing).
Oh yeah the WITCH
I love all the innovations that the remaster is bringing. However, I can't say I'm a fan of the new art style. It seemed to me that it has moved away from Pathfinder's unique style and become more generic.
Oof, Double Shot is still awful. That’s disappointing.
Well I ignored Pathfinder second edition when it came out and I'm more than happy to ignore your remaster as well.
Thank you for your service 🙏
For me the remaster books are just delaying books that I might actually want. We are a classic Pathfinder 2 household!
It's still 400 pages... do we really need 4 feats to "jump" in this god damn elf game?
Love the new Changes to the classes to get revamped & improved upon & I understand all the new changes had to be implemented quickly because of Wizards of the Coast and their "Wonderful Nonsense", However while i know this is just a preview the Witch from what I Can Gather from this preview is still just the same as before Witch in the original book.
1st. The Witch gets too many HEX focus spells & not enough focus points for those spells so maybe make it exclusive to the witch that can get more focus points than anyone else & cast more than one hex because the current focus spells I'm sorry to say are quite awful. I'm not asking for overpowered or broken I've heard the tales of the slumber witch from 1e pathfinder. Thats not what I'm looking for.
2nd. No matter how many times you hand players the "eldritch nails" so they can make claw attacks in melee combat with magic spells they won't do it. it's not a marshal class they have nothing to survive within melee combat instead make a subclass called "Patron Warrior" where it makes the witch class a marshal warrior like the Warpreist or a magus then the "eldritch nails" word work otherwise it's still a trap feat that doesn't help the witch in anyway.
3rd. The Familiar is a scout, or an extra spellcaster not a marshal, it's also the witches Spell book. I have no desire to sacrifice my familiar with 1 unique ability over other familiars for a flanker that still can't survive against an enemy more than a round. Instead give the familiar three unique abilities that no other familiar gets & unique familiars that no one else can have even with the familiar master archetype/dedication. giving the familiar a far more useful role or give the Witch more powerful familiars if you want and what happens if you enter a place where conjuration doesn't work and your familiar is dead you don't get your spells back until you leave that area.
4th. In PFS 2e Society play I'm the only one who picks a Witch (one of my favorites), because a bard is a much better choice & I can't replace any of the core four classes with the witch (Fighter, Rouge, Cleric, Wizard) at best it's a reasonable sixth character at worst seventh in a party. While the bard is the perfect fifth wheel character, if you want the witch to be useful make it a fifth wheel character like the bard & apply that to the other classes that aren't the core four classes for balancing purposes. Please explain how the witch is better than the wizard in scenarios, modules or AP's with four people & if your answering honesty it isn't and that's the problem, you'd never choose the witch over the wizard.
I love the classes and the ideas are cool but perhaps you should let the reworked classes be play tested before you fully rework them other than that i have to say on the top list of awesome the knife & cauldron reworks that was baller definitely keep that in the witch, I don't know way you guys didn't put that in the first place that was sick. Overall, you guys are doing great keep up the amazing work.
Warpriests only get Master with their deity’s weapon... 🤦🏼♂️
I think that is fair
It's late but it puts it on par with other martials, and has the same proficiency as magus for weapon and spells. Seems fair.
@@FlamingKumquat
It's just bad scaling. If someone is playing something like a trident+shield melee Warpriest who worships Erastil and defends settlements against monsters just becomes objectively worse than an identical build that worships Gozreh.
@@xNINJ4xSTE4LTHx
The issue is it being limited to only their diety's favored weapon, not that they're getting Master Proficiency.
@xdragoonzero0 it's a non-issue man. Most war priests only use their deities weapon only anyways. It's fine and much better than what we had.
i'm so glad you have your pronouns on screen. i would be so lost otherwise
Hah, second edition will never be a good tabletop game.
No summoner remaster, huh? Well, no reason to hesitate playing one, I suppose.
All this looks pretty exciting! If I keep GMing (def keep playing) I might have less house rules ❤