Your pushrods (front and rear) react from the lower wish-bone; the orientation places the (outer) rod-end at the wishbone to upright in bending (thread) and axial load (ball in housing). Rod-ends seem quite small - most suppliers recommend approximately 15% axial capacity of radial capacity - that won't leave much capacity. Your comments ... ?
Yeah, you definitely bombed the design portion. Oblique angles may work in CAD, but I'm guessing you ended up with lots of understeer or weird tracking around corners and the bell-crank pivot ripped off the frame if they actually let you run it on the course. That or you ripped a forward clevis off the frame on the lower A-arm during a brake test, or snapped the outer threaded rod-end on the lower off.
Your pushrods (front and rear) react from the lower wish-bone; the orientation places the (outer) rod-end at the wishbone to upright in bending (thread) and axial load (ball in housing). Rod-ends seem quite small - most suppliers recommend approximately 15% axial capacity of radial capacity - that won't leave much capacity. Your comments ... ?
Are you guys using rod ends /heim joints at you control arm kingpin pivot point???
can you tell me the best TIRES we can use for FSAE? dimensions and material included
bru... is you cant figure THAT out how TF are you gonna build litterly EVERYTHING ELS......
How the push rod mounted
like your english, not good lmao
how is the rocker mounted on can't figure out
pivoted on the chassis
Yeah, you definitely bombed the design portion. Oblique angles may work in CAD, but I'm guessing you ended up with lots of understeer or weird tracking around corners and the bell-crank pivot ripped off the frame if they actually let you run it on the course. That or you ripped a forward clevis off the frame on the lower A-arm during a brake test, or snapped the outer threaded rod-end on the lower off.
For this you don't need college diploma
What do u mean?
@Suvil jayaswin and he def failed lmao