Howard Gardner Discusses Multiple Intelligences - Blackboard BbWorld 2016 HD

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
  • Dr. Howard Gardner of the Harvard Graduate School of Education presents on his landmark theory of multiple intelligences for Blackboard's conference BbWorld 2016.

ความคิดเห็น • 110

  • @butterflymagicwithhottea9291
    @butterflymagicwithhottea9291 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am so happy to have found this video. We learned about this when I studied psychology in university as well as in early childhood education in college. I have ideas about how this can help develop much in the children in our classes. Thank you for all of your work, Dr. Gardner.

  • @yskim4u
    @yskim4u 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Deeply impressed by Author's direct presentation. MI is key to have happy life and peaceful world throughout balanced contribution by all human kinds by their talent I think. Thank you Dr.Gardner for establishing the great theory.

    • @SharpCookie
      @SharpCookie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      👏👏

    • @bleh.6485
      @bleh.6485 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SharpCookie Great to see you here.

  • @orlandomarchena4885
    @orlandomarchena4885 หลายเดือนก่อน

    His mentioning and explaining of "Teaching Intelligence" is one of those "Oh Yeah, Of Course, Now I Get It !!! " moments in my life. It's events like this that make life worth living.👍👍👍

  • @jc-fh3xz
    @jc-fh3xz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    There was a lot of information to take in but I learned a great deal.
    Thank you.

  • @mostsv
    @mostsv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I trully enjoy the ASMR effect of this

    • @HieroicDose
      @HieroicDose 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, I was thinking the same thing! I LOVE unintentional ASMR :)

  • @bhatraashid2864
    @bhatraashid2864 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Beautiful theory.I think it is still a groundwork towards creating a bigger picture of human intelligence dynamics.

    • @christophermcauliffe9141
      @christophermcauliffe9141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But how exactly? There are no studies showing multiple intelligences is true. How could it help if it’s misleading?

    • @bertlammens4392
      @bertlammens4392 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christophermcauliffe9141 Yeah, this theory is incorrect

    • @LeRoyBoxley434
      @LeRoyBoxley434 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bertlammens4392 For it to be incorrect it would have to be fact based, as you stated in your comment it is a theory. Do you know what a theory is?

    • @LeRoyBoxley434
      @LeRoyBoxley434 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christophermcauliffe9141 How can it be misleading? It's a theory.

    • @bertlammens4392
      @bertlammens4392 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LeRoyBoxley434 the theory of general relativity? See the problem with your argument?

  • @grantnormandin9468
    @grantnormandin9468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent reflection. I am happy I had the privilege to view this video. It truly was a wake up call. ~Grant

  • @dianarusike3589
    @dianarusike3589 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you are simply amazing Howard

  • @Afraa34
    @Afraa34 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing explanation. Thank you so much🙏🏻. I wish i had the oppertunity to discover my type of intelligence at school. But unfortunatly, still searching for it.

  • @bedwardreach
    @bedwardreach 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    great video, cant wait to start the book, i hope everybody has a good day!

  • @olaoluwaoladipupo3759
    @olaoluwaoladipupo3759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Every students need to be awaken to this fact of multiple intelligences

  • @ggrr7890
    @ggrr7890 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Impressed by your work. Congratulations from Greece. I hope that we manage to apply your theory also in our schools

    • @SharpCookie
      @SharpCookie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, we definitely need it in our schools!

  • @littlecat2222
    @littlecat2222 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for this theory. Its application worldwide has gradually influenced how we view and implement education.

  • @jenniferyoung5291
    @jenniferyoung5291 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have been a huge fan.... since 1985. - J.YO'

  • @CeciliaOcampo-tc8kx
    @CeciliaOcampo-tc8kx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing indeed, thanks for this video.

  • @mosesmuiruri8291
    @mosesmuiruri8291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    We should not memorize things for the sake of the exams...we should understand things for the sake of future reproducing the facts and applying in real life

    • @LeRoyBoxley434
      @LeRoyBoxley434 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You don't have to memorize, who told you that? You can ruminate and research topics to gain a better understanding. People like using the education system and teachers as an excuse for their own failings. School is not designed to to teach everything it is used for the main points of a topic. It is up to the individual to find their own interests.

  • @neooccisor8272
    @neooccisor8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love how we have all these videos and essays and studies all saying that our education system is missing crucial learning strategies. Yet absolutely NOTHING has changed about our educational system in over 50 years. They have painted a garbage can to look nice, but it's still a garbage can. Functional for one thing, but not at all what we need.

  • @majedal-ghamdi9595
    @majedal-ghamdi9595 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's why people are different in many ways. Your fingers are not same, so Dr. Howard is right 100%%

  • @harrisonthorpe7970
    @harrisonthorpe7970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So Intelligence is relative

  • @mesialeye8475
    @mesialeye8475 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I thought 50minute was lengthy, but it felt like 5 minutes! thank you for sharing it on youtube!

  • @ArtistsResource
    @ArtistsResource 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for being so thorough in your research.

  • @farkhandajabeen1959
    @farkhandajabeen1959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice to learn

  • @shirleybennett6534
    @shirleybennett6534 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have learned a lot more and will use most of it

  • @guillermohernandezquintana3649
    @guillermohernandezquintana3649 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    My gratitude Dr. Howard for sharing in a summary his approach of MI, but mainly.. why recognizing those capabilities in a holistic way is so important?: The good work!. Talent should be addressed for the sake of humanity. 3 E's over 3 M's. Thank-you

  • @narendrasinghbhati9342
    @narendrasinghbhati9342 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greatest sir. I salute you

  • @jeankarloconquistador6433
    @jeankarloconquistador6433 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I enjoyed this video. Two thumbs up!

  • @danielamainardi9689
    @danielamainardi9689 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks from Urbino- Italy...great lesson

  • @isskashmir
    @isskashmir 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome lecture

  • @RikodiusRex
    @RikodiusRex 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work!

  • @clementsfamily4854
    @clementsfamily4854 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wouldn't the skills listed in the proposed Pedagogical Intelligence be covered in the Interpersonal Intelligence?

  • @user-om8mz3ey6k
    @user-om8mz3ey6k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about building things - creating things - crafts - Art ?

  • @thomasjones5636
    @thomasjones5636 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Howard Gardner. What a guy !

  • @sallieugalleh4915
    @sallieugalleh4915 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a very lush and informative theory- mi theory has helped me to understand and improve the idea necessary to figure out my wholesale position in the real world of multiple intelligences. As a result of this theory ,now I 'm able to access other people's activities then figure out the intelligences they inherent.

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This theory is very simple based on this lecture alone, is this really his only claim, that there are at least 8 different intelligences that can be independently developed?

  • @TheGodLobster
    @TheGodLobster 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Around 3:00 you talk about the western and asian view of intelligence. Can I get a source for that, because I find i very internesting :)

  • @ikraminnorfolk6299
    @ikraminnorfolk6299 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great work

  • @prataps2341
    @prataps2341 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great theory...everyone should watch this video

  • @juneborn92
    @juneborn92 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can help me with characteristics and criticism of this approach...want a detailed explanation on this

  • @mikaisnang630
    @mikaisnang630 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i was hoping you to explain the 8 criteria intelligence such as psychometric task and so on because until now i dont get it i mean the words they used to explain is so difficult to comprehend and there's no example in each 8 criteria intelligence.

  • @suanpauvualnam9538
    @suanpauvualnam9538 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there anyone who can help me in getting the ppt slides file. It would really help me.

    • @bleh.6485
      @bleh.6485 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe that you're capable of seeing and typing stuff.

  • @toltacoatl
    @toltacoatl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    how about a 'sense for cause + effect'? must this not too be considered being a form of intelligence? take chess: I'd say one needs A) spacial awareness plus B) a sense for causalities..eventualities. here we enter the field of projective calculation. i believe, that in fact this intelligence should be calles projective intelligence (predicting of eventualities)

    • @gerardgag
      @gerardgag 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rosa Atom a sense for cause and effect would come nostly from experience though, following the chess example i would say that the "sense" comes from an intuitive understanding which is created by constant experiences similar either in concept or in feel

    • @suanpauvualnam9538
      @suanpauvualnam9538 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also may apply the Gestalt concept of pattern

  • @mahadevphad83
    @mahadevphad83 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @oldspammer
    @oldspammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    36:50 Opinion surveys conducted in the country a year or two after Mandela's death found that a very large percentage of people believe that the country was better off being run by the racial minority rather than the mass immigration influx of "temporary" workers who came in from all over the continent to get jobs, but who stayed there without getting citizenship, nor buying their own land, nor paying any taxes for government services, etc.

  • @bliss1086
    @bliss1086 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent

  • @dongmeilyu9688
    @dongmeilyu9688 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for sharing your wisdom.

  • @lhijk2135
    @lhijk2135 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good work

  • @Nastyfinger1444
    @Nastyfinger1444 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I used to serve as an elentsry enrichment teacher. Gardner's multiple intelligence theory was a central philosophy in our pedography experience.

  • @minhtrietphan2134
    @minhtrietphan2134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many thanks for the video. Thank you Dr. Howard Gardner for your amazing talk. I am really interested in the theory of Multiple Intelligence and I am going to have a study about the effects of MIT on vocabulary learning and retention. Would you mind giving me some advice on my study? I am looking forward to hearing from you.

  • @nigyarababajanova3460
    @nigyarababajanova3460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about those who are good in all intelligences?

  • @djlion7253
    @djlion7253 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What does ENA stand for?

  • @chemistrylearner2096
    @chemistrylearner2096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    PLEAEE USE A BETTER MICROFONE. iT IS DIFFICULT TO HEAR

  • @chandrav4199
    @chandrav4199 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you saying chilllldren learnacademuc concepts uding any of these mind?

  • @neooccisor8272
    @neooccisor8272 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    40:46 describes having to take classes that have nothing to do with your major or anything you want to do in life.

  • @eksaeko7842
    @eksaeko7842 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the best

  • @CC-ux6jv
    @CC-ux6jv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Howard Gardner's 1996, 1998, 2001, 2013, 2013, and 2013 lectures, each with its own unique title, largely cover the same material. The videos are not compelling.

  • @brendazambon2417
    @brendazambon2417 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The misunderstanding of the concept of intelligence used as the same as knowledge, but it is not the same. Just that.

  • @nestordariobarulich4842
    @nestordariobarulich4842 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    minute 33:36... ¿Les Luthiers?

  • @luancarvalhomatos7888
    @luancarvalhomatos7888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    33:45
    20:13
    29:52

  • @orlandomarchena4885
    @orlandomarchena4885 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂 Well, the term 😠 "Thanks A Lot" 😠 came to mind when he discussed Nelson Mandela right after telling about Goebels interpersonal intelligence 😵‍💫? lol ?🤣
    But really: I actually do understand and agree, that he pointed out their similar level of interpersonal intelligence.✌️

  • @Raveena07G
    @Raveena07G 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hy I m Gardner from india

  • @rubicunduseratiudas1264
    @rubicunduseratiudas1264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is ABSURD. Intelligence is capacity for abstract thought. It is neither knowledge, ability or skill. There can be people less intelligent than others, but who have more knowledge on a particular topic. An ability or skill can be acquired and developed, but not intelligence. He or she who was born an idiot can very well develop some skill or ability (perhaps even better than an intelligent person), but he/she will never be more intelligent, only better conditioned and adapted. An idiotic person will always be mentally limited.
    If we are intelligent we can question authors such as Gardner who are subject to error. Let's not accept something by mere authority. In the past the authorities have made mistakes; they will make mistakes in the future...

    • @Big-guy1981
      @Big-guy1981 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you replace "intelligence" by "aptitude", Dr Gardner's theory makes perfect sense.

    • @rubicunduseratiudas1264
      @rubicunduseratiudas1264 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Big-guy1981 Of course, that's the only way it would make sense. But equating intelligence with aptitude is simply idiotic.

    • @jlrinc1420
      @jlrinc1420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a fundamental misunderstanding of intelligence. All intelligence involves knowledge, ability or skill. There has never been an intelligence test that could test intelligence with testing some skill ability or knowledge. The idea that a g exists is a mathematical reification. There are no culture free tests. This is the conceit of western science that somehow it alone is free of bias. When we examine the historical reality it has never been true but we always believe that we have progressed to that point today. The real problem with multiple intelligences is that you cant make a living hustling nervous moms for hundreds of dollars in fees for psychometric batteries for their kids. This makes psychometricians very nervous. Plus you can longer justify your position as part of the cognitive elite in a society that truly values each persons unique gifts. It is much more useful to use iq to put everyone in their place according to a set of arbitrary rules. Specifically those that have been so helpful at taking resources from cultures without the ability to manufacture weapons as well as yours. All of this is very bad for the status quo, and so becomes scientifically untenable prima facia.

  • @oldspammer
    @oldspammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    36:50 Nelson Mandela. As a leader, Mandela was much smarter than the vast majority of his followers. He was university educated as a lawyer and confessed to having set off bombs all over the place, killing 20+ people in over 200 bombings. He was in possession of hundreds of explosive devices supplied to him by the former USSR.

  • @kaylaklein8639
    @kaylaklein8639 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What about spiritual intelligence 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @wolfgangamadeusmozart1816
      @wolfgangamadeusmozart1816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about taking a shit intelligence?

    • @bleh.6485
      @bleh.6485 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wolfgangamadeusmozart1816 😂 😂 😂 😂

  • @oldspammer
    @oldspammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    36:50 Mandela.
    was offered a get out of prison free card if he denounced mass killing of his ideological opponents, but he would NOT renounce violence. Who had such vast sums of money to fund the ANC to such an extent that the leadership ended up being multi-millionaires?

  • @staycalm8317
    @staycalm8317 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a long winded way to define... talents

  • @oldspammer
    @oldspammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    36:50 Temporary foreign workers come in. They lose their temporary jobs, but then stay.
    They are living on the proceeds of the tax monies of everyone else. When this is NOT the case, social programs are funded on monies that have grown the national debt.
    The national debts grow without bound through central banking and compounded debt servicing fees often through paper debt instruments such as government bonds and treasury notes.
    That debt is then purchased by foreign countries. This foreign debt principle owing becomes subject of international treaty law, currency exchange laws, debt servicing treaties, etc. After the debt becomes hundreds or hundreds of thousands of times the GDP or currency in circulation, the country is slave to the buyers of these debt instruments and then is subject to the political whims of the individuals in charge of this wealth.
    At that point the freedom of the country is LOST and is thereby enslaved to this small group who can create credit out of thin air, then purchase these debt instruments. Duh?

  • @karendusang3266
    @karendusang3266 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quantum intelligence?

  • @mirelladearman7377
    @mirelladearman7377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sounds like intellect, talent, skills, wisdom, etc, have all been put under the roof of 8 intelligences or maybe more. Scientifically flawed but practically helpful in teaching techniques!

    • @Zanzamat
      @Zanzamat 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is a talent with numbers considered intellect, but a talent with music isn't? Your argument is flawed.

  • @jenneroberts7219
    @jenneroberts7219 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    there is so much of value in this presentation, but by 15 minutes in I was wondering if Dr Gardner is aware that women exist. Then he talked about ethical teaching, leaving out women is unetical, and not so intelligent. He does mention Daw Aung Sung Suu Kyo, but that's about it. Pretty disappointing from sucsh an otherwise good thinker. What did he say, get your act together, be a good citizen, care and try to do teh right thing - which means engaging all people. INtelligences arent enough, include a few female explorers etc.

  • @oldspammer
    @oldspammer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    35:50 Mandela. The topic of history is troubling in that the wrong lessons, messaging, and conclusions can be impressed upon the public to believe in deception. After being in prison for nearly 30 years Mandela emerged from there and was a multi millionaire who had purchased lands, homes, etc, all over the place. His Marxist communist violent revolutionary tendencies where he planted and exploded terrorist bombs all over the place injured ina killed numerous, he confessed to in his court trial.

  • @kylesalii6467
    @kylesalii6467 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great way of words, put to fit a "mold". You cannot understand "me". And "me" in my actions... Bliss may be BEAUTIFUL. Plurilozation you say ? I am a product of my environment, you claim... So, I decide history.... I think u should take some shrooms and restart ur thinking process.. U know nothing of ur own "brain stuff"... I think, therefore I am. What is important. Numbers( a time of 3) so I claim... U say a study of good and bad. Holocaust. 6entry points of discipline u say.my only question, maaaayyy be existentialism. It "may" be my belief.

  • @seaneustace9838
    @seaneustace9838 ปีที่แล้ว

    PS if you can’t pass on multiple-choice exam, it’s because you don’t know the material. Don’t believe me I could give you a multiple-choice exam today on addition and subtraction and you would all get 100% because you know the material 100%. Let’s stop fooling ourselves, people are in fact just not very intelligent. I’m not saying this guy’s theory is off. I’d rather like it, but you, having physical intelligence or musical intelligence doesn’t take away from the fact that you are a rational, and cannot be taught history of mathematics.

  • @meridian1928
    @meridian1928 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gardner is a quack.

  • @jlrinc1420
    @jlrinc1420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah but you cant make $400 bucks selling some IQ test to nervous moms, so you can see the obvious theoretical flaws with this understanding of intelligence.