Remote ID Affects More Than Drone Pilots

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2023
  • Yes Remote ID applies to you!
    The FAA will be introducing Remote ID in September 2023 and right now the outlook for some drone pilots right now is not good.
    China Expats RC Discord: / discord
    FAA Website on Remote ID: faadronezone-access.faa.gov/#/
    _______________________________________________
    Buy me a coffee ☕ www.buymeacoffee.com/Chinaexp...
    Product Links: 💸
    Cheapest lipo charger I recommend (very basic): amzn.to/3NsS8Vu
    The lipo charger I use: amzn.to/435gwSV
    My controller of choice: amzn.to/3Nkfs7S
    My recommended tools: amzn.to/3PAaQNE
    _______________________________________________
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @ChinaExpatsRC
    @ChinaExpatsRC  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Discord if you have any more questions: discord.gg/c3jbKW3K

  • @slapdat.byteme
    @slapdat.byteme 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Only 46 more days until “Rogue Flying Day”! Bring it on, FAA!

  • @buddyadkins2432
    @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a note: Money doesn't even need to be involved for the flight to be a Part 107 activity. Producing videos for charity, to inspect one's own gutters or property, and ANY benefit, to ANY entity is a Part 107 activity. Collecting video to provide content for anything is a Part 107 activity.

    • @ChinaExpatsRC
      @ChinaExpatsRC  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's pretty crazy.

    • @buddyadkins2432
      @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChinaExpatsRC Well, maybe it is. However, there is the Recreational Exemption that allows flying sub-250 gram drones with NO registration and NO Remote ID as long as the flight is solely and purely for the recreational value (FUN) of the pilot and don't post the video. Nothing wrong with that. A lot can be done in the sub-250 gram category. Thing is, seems most people want to fly for providing content for something. They are not interested in flying if they can't use the content. That is what they want and THAT is Part 107.

  • @RenoLaringo
    @RenoLaringo 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The easiest way to look at it:
    If you make any cash with whatever you do, you're screwed.
    If what you do can reveal hidden things to the public, you're screwed.

  • @buddyadkins2432
    @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Consider that Remote ID is really the only addition to the regulations. Since 2016 (I think I got that correct) the following things violate the FAA regulations: 1) flying beyond Visual Line Of Sight. Not just that you can see a tiny dot on the horizon, but enough to control the craft should you lose video. Flying behind an object such as a building breaks line of sight. 2) flying FPV without a co-located spotter. 3) failing to register of drones over 250 grams. 4) Flying over people. Interestingly enough, a sub-250 grams, category 1, drone that is fitted with prop guard can fly over people. 5) Flying over trains. 6) Flying over National Parks. These are the highlights, but there are others. All unmanned aircraft, regardless of size, should come with a label: "Subject to FAA Regulations".

  • @HillbillyAdventures
    @HillbillyAdventures 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Shall not comply

  • @Sidnmd
    @Sidnmd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Motorized paraglider regulations are next

  • @jwtfpv8957
    @jwtfpv8957 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do you work for the FAA?

  • @buddyadkins2432
    @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As to the title; Remote ID will not make you a criminal (unless you don't install it, if needed), however, it just might provide evidence to show that you are already a criminal. IF you haven't read the FAA regulations, then maybe it is time. We can't just do what we want. At least know what laws you are (and have been) breaking. Ignorance is not excuse.

    • @slapdat.byteme
      @slapdat.byteme 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not “laws”… FAA is not a law-establishing entity, nor are they a law enforcement entity. They’re “rules”, and you know what they say about rules.

    • @buddyadkins2432
      @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@slapdat.byteme Might be, however, it seems regulations like these carry effectively the same results. We can bicker over law or regulations. You can still be fined. Plus, you CAN be jailed. Take a look at the one guy that was buzzing helicopters. You want to press it, go ahead. Me? I want to stay out of the way.

    • @slapdat.byteme
      @slapdat.byteme 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@buddyadkins2432 Anyone stupid enough to buzz choppers, fly over a stadium full of people, enter a no-fly zone, etc should suffer the consequences. I’ll continue flying safely (and after 9/16 illegally) because I’m responsible and allergic to bureaucratic bullshit. Besides, at my age the phrase “life in prison” aint the deterrent it used to be. 😎

    • @buddyadkins2432
      @buddyadkins2432 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@slapdat.byteme Each of us will determine where we fit into the scheme of things. Consider that in a couple of years pilots will realize that RID is not the "devil" that the rants have portrayed it. All DJI drones will have it by default. Of course for the true hobbyist, just fly where there are no people and all will be fine, regardless of how you play the game.

    • @buddyadkins2432
      @buddyadkins2432 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@slapdat.byteme Yes Laws: It is in the following LAW passed by congress: PUBLIC LAW 115-254-OCT. 5, 2018 titled FAA REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2018 (congress passed this LAW). Included in this LAW, is the requirement for Remote ID. Congress makes the laws, then the FAA makes regulations to affect, execute, and enforce those LAWS that Congress passed. Consider that the FAA is the enforcement agency for LAWS concerning the airspace.