What you have to remember is that with today's police recruitment, they are having to scrape the very bottom of the barrel to find anyone to work for them.. It's pretty much the same thing with America's military.
Is this why more and more people are now doing less and less for free for their Public-servants/Trustees whenever they want you to DO something for them? Them-Stand over there` - `Do what we tell you to do` - etc., You-`Yes, certainly (there is now an agreement to comply/obey/accommodate them) it’s just that we charge you $911 for remedy to DO that for you and because we have NO-CONFIDENCE with you administrating our Trust, payment must be with us immediately, thank you, Deal or no Deal?` Please remember that THEY are NOT volunteers…..so why should YOU be? The secret to dealing with your treacherous Trustees/paid Public-servants is just two words….CONDITIONAL acceptance. Would it not be best to be the polite BUSINESS-man….NOT the victim.
Well, in point of fact, it did not appear to be a "crime scene" so much as an accident scene. I also noticed that there was a middke aged woman standing int their purported "crime acene" that they gave no interest to. Only to the guy with the camera.
That was a good stance. The cops were exposed. The auditor got them to put the tape up for an investigation. He did not go to jail. Great exposure. Great job.
I’m in Santa Clarita right now and did a couple of audits yesterday of the City Hall, and the library and post office and overall it seems like they’re educated, even though they don’t like it
Just exactly what point did you prove? You followed their orders to back off behind the hydrant. That's not proving your point. You caved into their unlawful demand.
It is a camera. I am a retired IT guy so let me help the ignorant among us. Capturing a digital image of someone does not steal their sole or physically harm them and is not harrassment. If something is happening in public it is happening in public. Lets grow up. LEOs have a knee jerk reaction everytime they see a camera at a scene. 20 people can be standing around and they see one guy using their phone camera and freak out. Yes you can give the human decency speech to make yourself feel like a saint but public is public and if you don't like being recorded stay at home.
The cop can direct you to move without tape. When they ask you to move do so. Even if you think its not right. You can go to the department and submit a complaint later. Otherwise you do more harm, than good. Remember, legislators will always back the police since they are their personal guards..
I mean you can do that, I’ll stick with the knowledge I know, if they choose to illegally arrest me so be it. A directive isn’t a lawful order filling out complaints won’t do nothing. You can spin around and bark when they tell you to but me? I’m a free man ✌️
Its a ego thing. One time there was swat activity in the hood i grew up in. Geared up Swat officers let me kick it with them for a like 2 hours untill they told me it was no longer safe and they set up the tape. It was literally a armed standoff 😂 happened in las vegas. I watched the entire thing outside the tape, one of the officers even gave me a business card, and asked me to join the department. Those cops in this video arent very versed in constitutional rights.
For a start..interfering in a police investigation is verbal as well as physical. It is not essential for police to put up tape to create a crime scene. As long as you film at the distance required by the police just as professional journalists do, you are within your right to film. Calling out to either the police or the those being questioned is interference.
@@DontAskHomieIf they could by law they would of arrested you. But that camera made them think twice. If they did arrest you it would of been a nice lawsuit. ATTY@LAW.369
Incorrect. However, it can be verbal if you incite a suspect to resist or to "fight back." It is unlikely that his presence alone would constitute interference.
Interferring is absolutely NOT ""physical""; show some respect , there is someone in need of medical assistance ... you are in public but police can lawfully block off an area of any size, and yeah you said it ,,, you don't care,,, you just wanted to make a point ,,,, deliberately purposefully harassing police ,,,, what a child .... what happened to you ,,, you got arrested because you broke the law and ""it's not fair wah wah "" so now you harasse police to get revenge ....
Please explain to me how silently standing on a public sidewalk is interfering with ANYTHING those cops need to do in order to conduct their investigation. The reason they're butthurt is because of the camera he's holding. Cops hate cameras because cameras expose them for the criminals they really are. Cameras end cops careers. Cameras put cops behind bars. Cops hate cameras, and they hate anyone they see holding one.
Interfering as well as obstruction as sure as hell physical acts. He's on a public sidewalk and the US Supreme Court has already ruled cops CANNOT dictate how far back someone has to be. It's all b/c he's recording them and we all know how bad cops HATE that as it exposes their corruption from the public.
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 6 // G2 vs GEN | 100T vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M6jxF80AajI/mqdefault.jpg)
Cop all mouth, All his threats to arrest dismissed
His ego is shy he wants tape. He’s just mad that he can’t lord over him. If there was a real crime scene they’d have already tapped it off.
What you have to remember is that with today's police recruitment, they are having to scrape the very bottom of the barrel to find anyone to work for them..
It's pretty much the same thing with America's military.
Leo with the ears. stop asking why your hated. just stop asking.
Ok I think once the police confirm it's a crime scene they should automatically tape it off probably 🤦🏽♂️
Negative. They can personally direct you around it. Now leave smarter than when you arrived.
The way you answered makes you a dick @@krane15
Was it even a crime? Looked like an accident.
I wish you became a great human rights protector 🙏🏼
Thank you!
To lazy that put up tape. They would rather bark orders than don’t have to be obeyed
Is this why more and more people are now doing less and less for free for their Public-servants/Trustees whenever they want you to DO something for them?
Them-Stand over there` - `Do what we tell you to do` - etc.,
You-`Yes, certainly (there is now an agreement to comply/obey/accommodate them) it’s just that we charge you $911 for remedy to DO that for you and because we have NO-CONFIDENCE with you administrating our Trust, payment must be with us immediately, thank you, Deal or no Deal?`
Please remember that THEY are NOT volunteers…..so why should YOU be?
The secret to dealing with your treacherous Trustees/paid Public-servants is just two words….CONDITIONAL acceptance.
Would it not be best to be the polite BUSINESS-man….NOT the victim.
Makes you wonder who was the lady with the baby????
Well, in point of fact, it did not appear to be a "crime scene" so much as an accident scene. I also noticed that there was a middke aged woman standing int their purported "crime acene" that they gave no interest to. Only to the guy with the camera.
That was a good stance. The cops were exposed. The auditor got them to put the tape up for an investigation. He did not go to jail. Great exposure. Great job.
Thank you
They are scared of cameras and being recorded like a baby scared of the boogy man. Should see them in Court, they cry like one also.
Seriously. 😂😂😂
EARNING THE HATE AND I CAN'T WAIT.
I’m in Santa Clarita right now and did a couple of audits yesterday of the City Hall, and the library and post office and overall it seems like they’re educated, even though they don’t like it
I was just watching your Maui video yesterday that’s crazy, I’ll make sure to check out your SCV video thanks for watching btw!
I'm curious after reading of some comments here, is there anymore to this video
No this is it unfortunately
Just exactly what point did you prove? You followed their orders to back off behind the hydrant. That's not proving your point. You caved into their unlawful demand.
They bullied you away. Stand firm next time. It's easy to say while we're here and you were there. Good job anyway.
Stop giving bad advice.
@@krane15they were literally putting up tape
They didn't make the lady move, so why you move......This not for U dude 🙄
The lady was part of the investigation you goober
These cops are redlicious
🐽egos
I got a gun and a badge there don’t hurt my feelings please 😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉
These cops are a joke
It is a camera. I am a retired IT guy so let me help the ignorant among us. Capturing a digital image of someone does not steal their sole or physically harm them and is not harrassment. If something is happening in public it is happening in public. Lets grow up. LEOs have a knee jerk reaction everytime they see a camera at a scene. 20 people can be standing around and they see one guy using their phone camera and freak out. Yes you can give the human decency speech to make yourself feel like a saint but public is public and if you don't like being recorded stay at home.
It didn't have to do with filming. It had to do with the cameraman being IN THE SCENE.
He really believes that "because I said so" is a lawful order, then struts away
But the cameraman stepped back like he was told! 🤣🤣🤣
In this instance, it is.
The cop can direct you to move without tape. When they ask you to move do so. Even if you think its not right. You can go to the department and submit a complaint later. Otherwise you do more harm, than good. Remember, legislators will always back the police since they are their personal guards..
I mean you can do that, I’ll stick with the knowledge I know, if they choose to illegally arrest me so be it. A directive isn’t a lawful order filling out complaints won’t do nothing. You can spin around and bark when they tell you to but me? I’m a free man ✌️
This is very unprofessional
Telling by this frauditors voice, I’ll guess to say daddy loved him more than mommy if you know what I mean.
Maybe someone should ask them if they can not only quote 148(a) but even bothered to read to 148(g)
Ya gotta take the arrest for the money and fame. Giving in doesn't make for a good video.
Its a ego thing. One time there was swat activity in the hood i grew up in. Geared up Swat officers let me kick it with them for a like 2 hours untill they told me it was no longer safe and they set up the tape. It was literally a armed standoff 😂 happened in las vegas.
I watched the entire thing outside the tape, one of the officers even gave me a business card, and asked me to join the department.
Those cops in this video arent very versed in constitutional rights.
You really should not do audits if you're unwilling to be unlawfully arrested.
Nobody should be willing to be unlawfully arrested. They could have simply threatened arrest and let him be on his way.
The threat of arrest is just as bad and you don't have all the inconvenience after actually being arrested
True. He punked out. He empowered the cops.
They said they were gonna set up some tape and make a crime scene… I would’ve lawfully been arrested if I stayed no?
@@DontAskHomieget a threat of arrest ultimatum not a maybe if could might
Get 'em bro...I love this shit!!
For a start..interfering in a police investigation is verbal as well as physical. It is not essential for police to put up tape to create a crime scene. As long as you film at the distance required by the police just as professional journalists do, you are within your right to film. Calling out to either the police or the those being questioned is interference.
U R totally wrong
You're so full of it officer
@@dwightcalloway7538 I am entirely correct!
Interfering is not physical. You suck at this. Go the distance or don't start the race.
I’m confused… so you’re saying I should’ve been arrested? And would’ve been better if I got arrested? That sounds wild to me
@@DontAskHomie All you did was empower the cops.
@@DontAskHomieIf they could by law they would of arrested you. But that camera made them think twice. If they did arrest you it would of been a nice lawsuit. ATTY@LAW.369
Incorrect. However, it can be verbal if you incite a suspect to resist or to "fight back." It is unlikely that his presence alone would constitute interference.
@@krane15 I am 100% correct. Try again.
Interferring is absolutely NOT ""physical"";
show some respect , there is someone in need of medical assistance ... you are in public but police can lawfully block off an area of any size, and yeah you said it ,,, you don't care,,, you just wanted to make a point ,,,, deliberately purposefully harassing police ,,,, what a child .... what happened to you ,,, you got arrested because you broke the law and ""it's not fair wah wah "" so now you harasse police to get revenge ....
Please explain to me how silently standing on a public sidewalk is interfering with ANYTHING those cops need to do in order to conduct their investigation. The reason they're butthurt is because of the camera he's holding. Cops hate cameras because cameras expose them for the criminals they really are. Cameras end cops careers. Cameras put cops behind bars. Cops hate cameras, and they hate anyone they see holding one.
Interfering as well as obstruction as sure as hell physical acts. He's on a public sidewalk and the US Supreme Court has already ruled cops CANNOT dictate how far back someone has to be. It's all b/c he's recording them and we all know how bad cops HATE that as it exposes their corruption from the public.
Wrong. And wrong
No It's right , ,,, when someone is wrong, they delete they're comments , as we can see here.
Interference is a physical act. Read the law.