Lawen wants Sweden to be a rich country at the same time as the policies of (S) run contrary to both GDP growth and improved productivety. Why were not high taxes and overregulation discussed?
Kurderna har inget land, det är en etnicitet. Svensk är medborgare av nationen Sverige, finns ingen etnicitet som heter svensk. Det finns två etniska grupper som anses vara ursprungsbefolkning i Sverige, vilka är Skandinav och Same. Lär dig de rätta benämningarna.
On the welfare state perhaps Milton Friedman's, statement: "You can have a strong welfare state or you can have open borders, but you can not have both", while obvious, could have been brought up.
Perhaps a million unskilled migrants can not produce for as much as it costs to hire them and are therefore unemployable. How does Lawen want to solve this? Language and integration classes have proven ineffective.
People typically organise themselves so they can live among those who are similar. Social engineering advocated for by Lawen has rarely worked, except perhaps in Singapore.
Det finns många som inte äter sill. Det finns också många som äter sill i andra länder som tex Tyskland. Kändes larvigt att ta upp det alls i samtalet.
It is well-known which nationalities make the best immigrants. To take a cue from those statistics would run contrary to "everyone's equal value". Was that the reason why this information was ignored?
The former finance minister, Borg, has said that a university education from MENA was more akin to secondary education in northern Europe. If that is correct is it taken into account when hiring people from MENA?
Lawen wants everyone to work at the same time as (S), with its generous welfare system, that individuals can live on indefinitely, makes it unattractive to work. Does she not see the contradiction?
Lawen is obviously a smart politician who is quite a bit more self-critical than most. How did she end up with (S) who has created most of Sweden's problems?
Violent crime is seen by many as one of Sweden's biggest problems. Why was that not discussed?
Det finns ingen i de utsatta områdena som håller med om att Lawen Redar är etniskt svensk då samtliga i princip skulle hävda att hon är etniskt kurd.
Lawen wants Sweden to be a rich country at the same time as the policies of (S) run contrary to both GDP growth and improved productivety. Why were not high taxes and overregulation discussed?
Perhaps you do not become Swedish just by being given a passport.
Kan vem som helst bli kurd, eller är det bara svensk alla kan bli?
Kurderna har inget land, det är en etnicitet. Svensk är medborgare av nationen Sverige, finns ingen etnicitet som heter svensk. Det finns två etniska grupper som anses vara ursprungsbefolkning i Sverige, vilka är Skandinav och Same.
Lär dig de rätta benämningarna.
Vilket myssamtal.
On the welfare state perhaps Milton Friedman's, statement: "You can have a strong welfare state or you can have open borders, but you can not have both", while obvious, could have been brought up.
Perhaps a million unskilled migrants can not produce for as much as it costs to hire them and are therefore unemployable. How does Lawen want to solve this? Language and integration classes have proven ineffective.
This is a softball interview - problems that should be right on top are barely broached.
People typically organise themselves so they can live among those who are similar. Social engineering advocated for by Lawen has rarely worked, except perhaps in Singapore.
Why weren't the unemployed migrants, one of the largest power bases of (S), discussed?
Det finns många som inte äter sill. Det finns också många som äter sill i andra länder som tex Tyskland. Kändes larvigt att ta upp det alls i samtalet.
It is well-known which nationalities make the best immigrants. To take a cue from those statistics would run contrary to "everyone's equal value". Was that the reason why this information was ignored?
The former finance minister, Borg, has said that a university education from MENA was more akin to secondary education in northern Europe. If that is correct is it taken into account when hiring people from MENA?
Lawen wants everyone to work at the same time as (S), with its generous welfare system, that individuals can live on indefinitely, makes it unattractive to work. Does she not see the contradiction?
Lawen is obviously a smart politician who is quite a bit more self-critical than most. How did she end up with (S) who has created most of Sweden's problems?
Det var Reinfeld och högern som öppnade gränserna på vid gavel.
@@777mannen-bx5ji Sweden's problems are many only some relate to uncontrolled migration.