Professional company and was affraid to do the real test against hq camera. Why you used wide angle lens for hq camera only. Why lens parameters are not included?
The Distrotion test doesnt make sense for the HQ camera without including the lens used and consideration that its changeable - thats what does the distortion
64 mp camera is dead on arrival. Bookworm is the official operating system of the raspberry pi now, but the Arducam company clearly states that this camera will only work on Bullseye operating system, which is EOL in July 2024. Arducam has NO plans to get this working with Bookworm on Raspberry pi 4.
@Arducam - Is the clarity test card vector art or pixel-based? In the 64MP result @ 1:56 we see staircase upon staircase, which is the tell-tale sign of upsampling from a lower-resolution camera. Or, it could be the clarity card letters are themself pixelated. Which is it?
Most of this "test" is invalid because of the lens disparity with the HQ cam. Then you omitted the HQ cam from the low-light test. Buried for the trash that this is.
Hello, I would like to know in the distortion test at what distance did you place the Arducam16Mp and what size is the grid you used? Very good job, thank you!
Very nice comparison , it's striking to see the color of the white background being not so white on any camera, has lights conditions changed during the test, did you used the same parameter for capturing the camera like aperture/shutter speed, or at least proportionnal. Because each camera has a different set parameters ( sensor size, lens aperture, default shutter speed, iso level ) that could really affect the quality of the image result, you should maybe have configured the camera using camera settings that give the same light conditions on each camera, for exemple, if sensor size small, make the aperture of the camera wider, because evaluating color depth (dynamic range mostly) is complicated in this scenario, otherwise very nice test and honest. My feeling is that the rasberry pi v3 is a nice camera but the small sensor is a problem, I still prefer 16Mp and 64Mp. The HQ is horrible in any scenario ( it seems to be because of the lens )
Look at the 'Clarity' test's letter enlargement @ 1:56, 64MP shows a double staircase! Stairs upon stairs. That may be the tell-tale sign that we're not seeing true 64MP resolution. Or, it could be the clarity card itself has pixels that are causing the double staircase effect. Unclear which it is.
Lack of words meant any conclusions were at best 'doctored' guesses. Unimpressed by any presentation lacking words. Music just is not a good sales tool. Disappointing demo. Arducam is normally impressive but not in this trainwreck.
Professional company and was affraid to do the real test against hq camera. Why you used wide angle lens for hq camera only. Why lens parameters are not included?
The Distrotion test doesnt make sense for the HQ camera without including the lens used and consideration that its changeable - thats what does the distortion
Agreed, seems like it was not calibrated for the distortion
Why wasn't the RPi HQ Camera included in the *Low Light Performance* test?
Because they knew the RPi HQ camera outperformed it.
64 mp camera is dead on arrival. Bookworm is the official operating system of the raspberry pi now, but the Arducam company clearly states that this camera will only work on Bullseye operating system, which is EOL in July 2024. Arducam has NO plans to get this working with Bookworm on Raspberry pi 4.
@Arducam - Is the clarity test card vector art or pixel-based? In the 64MP result @ 1:56 we see staircase upon staircase, which is the tell-tale sign of upsampling from a lower-resolution camera. Or, it could be the clarity card letters are themself pixelated. Which is it?
Hi, the test card is on a computer screen (4k). If it is placed very large, a staircase effect will inevitably appear.
Best camera for price is raspberry pi camera V3 or the arducam 16mp
So maker of a product made review. What a coinsidence that arducams are winners...
Most of this "test" is invalid because of the lens disparity with the HQ cam. Then you omitted the HQ cam from the low-light test. Buried for the trash that this is.
Hello, I would like to know in the distortion test at what distance did you place the Arducam16Mp and what size is the grid you used? Very good job, thank you!
Can you upload the original images somewhere?
Most of these results mean very little without including the settings used for each image.
could be solve 40x zoom ?
does it support picamera2?
Very nice comparison , it's striking to see the color of the white background being not so white on any camera, has lights conditions changed during the test, did you used the same parameter for capturing the camera like aperture/shutter speed, or at least proportionnal. Because each camera has a different set parameters ( sensor size, lens aperture, default shutter speed, iso level ) that could really affect the quality of the image result, you should maybe have configured the camera using camera settings that give the same light conditions on each camera, for exemple, if sensor size small, make the aperture of the camera wider, because evaluating color depth (dynamic range mostly) is complicated in this scenario, otherwise very nice test and honest.
My feeling is that the rasberry pi v3 is a nice camera but the small sensor is a problem, I still prefer 16Mp and 64Mp. The HQ is horrible in any scenario ( it seems to be because of the lens )
Arducam 64MP clearly the winner
It depends, in low light hq is the winner in real projects
Look at the 'Clarity' test's letter enlargement @ 1:56, 64MP shows a double staircase! Stairs upon stairs. That may be the tell-tale sign that we're not seeing true 64MP resolution. Or, it could be the clarity card itself has pixels that are causing the double staircase effect. Unclear which it is.
This would be great if the arducam was reliable. I regret the time it took to get this thing to work . Not worth the money or time.
appears deceptive
Lack of words meant any conclusions were at best 'doctored' guesses. Unimpressed by any presentation lacking words. Music just is not a good sales tool. Disappointing demo. Arducam is normally impressive but not in this trainwreck.