You are so right, I bet 90% of photographer's are hobby, amateur's, enthusiast, and as you said we are out to enjoy the wildlife and getting better at our hobby.
For all the keyboard warrior pros who get butt hurt when I said "more reach", of course I know your lens don't magically turn into an 800 prime to give more reach. It just becomes the equivalent, as I stated because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ or megapixel resolution like when cropping in camera, or in post. Or losing light from a teleconverter to give similar results. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" or allusion of a 160-800 equivalent. Of course it's not in a literal sense. Man, a simple word like "reach" triggers people, lmao.
Started bird photography about a year ago. And over that time till now I agree with you. No need for a tripod, no need for a full frame camera, no need for camouflage. Using canon 80d that I already owned and added a 150-600 sigma contemporary as lens. It works great. All other gear you want can be added to your inventory later. 🙂 happy photographing
I've been photographing wildlife for almost 60 years. Here's my opinion, for what it's worth. An APS-C camera can sometimes be an advantage, as it gets you optically "closer". Cropping in post can sometimes work if you have the pixels, but being optically "closer" while shooting helps to get the right shot. Camouflage isn't to hide from the animals, it's to hide from other photographers. The last thing you want is another photographer spooking your subject because they spot you in the woods and walk out to see "what you got"! Finally, any serious amateur or professional photographer is going to eventually wish they had a tripod. You don't have to haul one around everywhere you go, and in fact it would be a mistake and a hindrance to do so, but you can ALWAYS improve image quality by using one, especially in low light. Just something to keep in mind. Plus, if you are using a long, heavy lens, and spending hours with a subject, it is super nice to give your arms a break, and yet still be ready to shoot in an instant.
I've been photographing mostly song birds here in Alaska for a few years and I'm amazed at how fast the warbler family of birds can be as well as how well woodpeckers blend into birch trees. Sad thing is alot of photographers play the "gear game" and say you can't do XXX with certain cameras etc. I miss the days of when you run across a fellow wildlife photographer and you just happily talk shop about what you've seen etc. It feels like alot of people here in Alaska get snotty and secretive and thats just sad and not what I use to love about photography
I know this is an older video but on gear, IF you use a large lens (I use a 200-5-- Nikon) you can get a CF monopod and a waverly mono gimbal and just walk with it on your shoulder. A pool noddle and came tape can add extra padding
The r7 isn't too far off for sure. Being a smaller sensor it will have it's flaws, and going into the camera knowing it's limitations will help, but if you do a lot of wildlife (especially birds) the r7 has a lot of benefits. Really any crop APSC like the 90d is very capable. I agree forest, the tech going into these new crop bodies are allowing us to stay out a little longer than the past for APSC
Excellent! I am retired and on a fixed income. I bought a cropped sensor used (Canon R7) and 2 used RF lenses for less than $2500. Yesterday at dawn we had a doe give birth to twin fawns in our Montana pasture and got some great shots from our deck with a $600 (used) Canon RF800 lens (equiv to 1280mm due to the crop sensor).
I agree, I use an R7 and a 100-500mm hand held most of the time. I wish other youtubers would embrace your train of thought, I have been a wildlife photographer for a few years now and remember at the start of my journey, getting so confused with all the different information on TH-cam. Well done for saying how it is..
Thank-you. I chose my R7 with the RF 100-500 for birding , and I am thrilled with the results. Modern sensors and denoising software mean that APSC performs as well as full frame from a few years ago for high ISO/ low light situations. Too much of the advice on TH-cam seems antiquated! Thanks for setting the record straight.
The 10 year old Canon 7D MK 2 fitted with 100-400mm remains a potent wildlife camera. Weather sealed, dual CF & SD card slots, 160-640mm equivalent reach and damn near indestructible.
Enjoying your photography is paramount. Some of my images are crap. Sometimes I delete them straight away, sometimes I don't. But I still enjoy the experience of getting out in nature, experiencing the environment and just taking photos for my enjoyment. If someone else likes my images, that's a bonus! I'm enjoying your videos too. Just subscribed.
The thing about crop censors confuses me. When you say 800mm equivalent, you're not really getting extra "reach", as in being able to see subjects that are further away, right? Isn't it just that it frames the subject in a smaller view versus having to crop in on a photo from a full frame camera?
I mention this in another comment by rooster. It's not a true 800mm focal length like a true 800mm lens. It just becomes the equivalent, because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ when cropping in post. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" of a 160-800 equivalent.
I really liked this video. This good for any gear you might have. I've been a photographer for over 50 years. I personally use canon rebel d1000 xs and t7. My main lens is a 75 300 4 and I think I do quite well with it. I have a tripod but in all my years never for the most part found it that useful. I enjoy photography for what it is. I've had photographers try to tell you how to improve your pictures but I've began to realize if you like it there is no improvement needed. Thanks for that video.
The t7 was one of my first cameras. It's solid choice for sure. And you're right. If YOU like the photo, that's all that matters. Unless you have clients but even then, you have to love your style and your own craft before any client will. Thanks for watching Murray
@@KevinNordstrom I'm pretty much the only one that sees my work anymore. Don't do much pro work anymore. Photography is for me and the fun in it. The t7 is working out well for me. I still use the xs too.
Thank you for the video. I'm committed to DSLRs and prefer old time-tested bodies. Never throw away cameras that are in good working condition. I use Canon 1D Mark IV with 600mm composite prime lens (EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II + EF 2x III). This produces a reach of 780mm on the APS-H body (hope you heard about it). However, for bird flight shots, I use a lighter combo 7D + EF 400mm f/5.6L USM. This produces 640mm reach. Sometimes use the 7D with the 600mm composite combo in order to get 960mm reach when felt necessary. Thanks again.
I’ve been photographing professionally for over 30 years and I have a full frame and a crop frame. My crop frame is my wildlife body for the exact reason you mention. I tend to use a tripod more now but that is because the older I get I have a harder time holding the camera steady. Great video!
I totally agree Tomas. It's a catch 22 the older we get. We want to go lighter and hand hold or we can't keep steady and need a tripod lol it's a love hate relationship with those things lol 😆 also I enjoy camo too but I rarely wear it unless I'm at the marsh for ducks. thanks for watching and happy shooting. 📸
good video Kevin. Many times it is more about the quality of the experience than the quality of the images. The story the photograph tells is what I find as the most important aspect of wildlife and nature photography. I like the way you think.
Thanks for making the video. One thing I will disagree with you on is the point you made that a crop sensor camera gives you more reach than a full-frame camera. A 500mm lens on a crop sensor camera gives you the same magnification that it does on a full-frame camera, but since the image is cropped you're just seeing less of the image making it appear to be closer. Take care!
Good one Kevin. Like most anything else, when you have been doing something for awhile, one will develop their own likes and dislikes. Be that their equipment or their approach to photography. I found that process to be a lot of fun. Take care now.👍👍
Thanks for another uplifting video. I look forward to them each and every week. Tomorrow I’m off searching for Ring-neck and Northern Pintail ducks at a local sewage lagoon. I spotted them today and as usual left my camera at home. When will I learn. Anyways keep up the great work and happy shooting.
Then my favourite discussion is the carry straps, the body harness. Here in Africa on a long hike through the bush looking for wildlife you carry your gear in your hand or a simple strap over your shoulder or cross body just to prevent a drop. But you carry your gear in your hand, for action, not for show off. Had a group from USA coming to Botswana the stuff these people brought with them as mind blowing, Accra plates, replacement lens foots, body harnesses, way too much equipment, the endless fiddling at a sighting to decide what camera lens combination to use. I was using one camera with a zoom, the guide was using one camera with a 300 mm prime. I had another camera with a wide angle zoom. Some of them had 3 bodies with 5 lenses, memory cards and batteries all over the place. One morning we told the group for the sake of improving photography, that they were only allowed 1 camera and one lens and take a second body with short lens for wide shots. It was a revelation. I think most of them went back realising they have too much gear, not enough focus on that and how they shoot. have fun, carry less shoot more.
Hi Kevin, I use a 5dm4 and a 7dm2. Since I use DXO PURERAW the APSC camera is my favorit for Wildlife as well as Icehockey. Not afraid about high ISO, fast enough for me and my 150-600 Sigma is a 980mm and the 120-300 2.8 is now a 480mm lence.
Started photography 2 years ago with a Nikon D3500 & a 70-300mm. Quickly found myself wanting more for wildlife & birds specifically & upgraded to a Nikon Z5 + Sigma 150-600mm and I shoot handheld consistently. Haven't ever found myself in a situation where I've wanted to bust out the tripod yet. Great video!
Great video Kevin. My back is not thanking me for carrying my tripod for hours yesterday as I dabbled in some bird photography. I didn’t even use it so lugged it around! I’m using Sony A7IV with 100-400 and it’s light weight enough to carry and no issues with image stabilisation. Also some lovely photos too!!
Hey rooster. Hope your day is well. It's not a true 800mm focal length like a true 800mm lens. It just becomes the equivalent, because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ or megapixel resolution when cropping in post or in camera. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" of a 160-800 equivalent without losing a stop of light or slows down the auto focus as when you put on an teleconverter to get similar results.
When you are using a crop sensor camera, they have a crop factor. With canon you multiply your lens length times 1.6. So at 500mm it becomes 800mm and so on. Hope this helps
Hello Todd. I can answer that question for you. The power of the lense doesn't change, what changes is the appearance of you subject on the crop sensor. Canon cameras which are crop sensor have a factor of 1.6 increase of appearance. You multiply the power of the lense by 1.6 factor and that gives you the appearance of added magnification. A 150-600 zoom lense becomes a 240-960 lense on a crop sensor camera, which as a side note is all I use and all dslr bodies (4 Canon bodies). There a many videos which can explain the process alot better then I did but I hope this helps.
So the need for a 1.4 or 2.0 teleconverter is negligible with a crop sensor camera? Why risk putting your image through more glass? I have a 100-400 and just try to get as close as I can.
I personally avoid using converters on my zoom lenses due to the increase f stop and the extra glass to shoot though. However I do use both my 1.4 and my 2x Sigma converters on my Sigma 500mm f4 depending on the circumstances. Leaving in 4 days for a week in Yellowstone and hoping my big glass gets a workout.
The images & video I have Seen Doesn't Look That great sir, not be rude. Maybe You Might need a tripod / Monopod. Quite A few Images Were Soft & Video Out Of Focus. All the best 👍🏻
I really thought that I would miss my crop sensor when I moved to full frame, but it's not that bad. I do find my self switching to crop mode occasionally, but it's pretty rare. Definitely agree about the tripod, I often have it, but rarely use it. As for camo, I've never used it, so I can't vouch for whether or not it would help me, but I think I'm doing okay, mostly. Great video brother, keep it up. God bless.
Thanks Craig. Yeah I use both FF and Crop. I'm going to upgrade my RP to the r5ii or the R1, and the R7 as my 2nd body in the field. Both are great for sure. Just pointing out the benefits of APSC for wildlife. Thanks for continued support and God bless! 📸
Good info, thanks. But one question? you seem to be using in the video a canon RP full frame camera, which seems to be a little odd considering you are promoting APSC cameras. Also that camera is not listed in your gear list.
I have both APSC and full frame. I never said one was better than the other. I'm simply saying why apsc is a solid choice. Just because it's not the camera used in the video, is irrelevant to the info provided. As for the RP not being in my gear list, it is in alot of my older videos. I'm in the process of upgrading from the RP to the R1 and having another r7 as my backup and giving my RP to my daughter. I have and never will promote one system or brand etc.. being better than another. Thanks for watching and happy shooting 📸
Really interesting video Kevin. I almost agree with you, even though there isn't a real rule, and for every situation there are pros and cons. Usually I prefer to use a tripod, as well as camouflage stuff. About apsc cameras, I'm totally with you, even though brands tend to not make apsc lenses, so usually we bought apsc cameras, but we use them with full frame lenses!! It's quite weird in my opinion. Now I'm using only full frame cameras because I love landscape photography as well, and sometimes I love taking pictures of the Milky Way, and in situation like that full frame sensors are better.
I have shot with apsc cameras since I started and really got into photography back in 2016. This is also the year my current camera came out which is Nikon D500. My favourite genre of photography is wildlife it's also the genre that I'm best at. I agree with all your points as this is pretty much my style. Though in the UK at least it is beneficial to at least where dull colours and green tones. Most birds and wildlife here can be very skittish. The only times where I use camo or use a tripod in wildlife photography is if I'm targeting a specific species and I'm hidden and waiting for my subject to show up. The myth of you needing a full frame really is just that. I belong to a camera club and I place above full frame users frequently and recently won best wildlife image above club lvl. This isn't just my opinion these are images being judged by very experienced and qualified judges. While full frame might be a better choice in certain circumstances it does not mean you can't get a shot without full frame.
Totally agree Baz. Congratulations on the photo winning. Nature and wildlife Photography is a life long hobby and so many (myself included) can get wrapped up so much in the gear that we forget it's about the experience first. Happy shooting 📸
Thanks for your amazing educational videos. I’ve got a question for you because I see you are a canon R and I have the same camera and I hope you can help. Sometimes when I’m out in nature, I tend to try different shooting modes, including auto, just to see a different perspective. I however noticed that if my shutter on auto mode goes higher, the shutter release is faster and there isn’t a lag at all. When I try the same exact settings or even higher shutter speed on shutter priority mode or even manual and flexible priority mode, the shutter release is slower and feels like there is a lag even if I’m on high speed drive mode. What could be the issue here? Thanks a lot.
First time to the channel, thanks for the efforts, shots, video. I love my D500 APSC 1.5x crop body. I do own a D850 - but the low purrr of the shutter on the D500 and slightly higher frame rate and less weight were always pluses - and some of my best award winning shots were with that camera - because it is what I was using when the event happened. I'm not a professional, but the 1.5X Nikon/Sony or 1.6x crop for Canon is just that - a crop - technically, not more effective reach - no, I'm not one of those. So, I'll let it go there. As for camouflage, I would agree for what I shoot. Typically, holding your position long enough is enough to do the trick (not to mention, shooting silently). Last year I photographed a white egret in flight headed across the water when it banked and headed right at the camera/lens/me. My AF and tracking followed the bird flawlessly until the bird clearly got within the minimum focus distance (you can image the image in the EVF). A big white blob and then, wait for it, a thump. I very slowly looked up from the viewfinder to find the white egret sitting on my long lens (Tripod mounted on the ground). I was thinking "You've got to be kidding me". As for handholding vs tripod - not sure this one is as much MYTH as it is preference or shooting style. As you know, having a kit that can be handheld, frees you up with respect to where you go, what you can do to frame a shot, and ultimately what kind of shot you get. That freedom has a lot going for it. There are many shots that win wildlife photography contests (if that's your thing) that are not tripod bound. The quality glass that you speak of that is light, great VR, and flexible is not going to come cheap. Then again, it's not cheap if you put it on a tripod either ;-) Nice composition, time line story board, and thanks for keeping it tight, to the point, and b-roll splices. Well done. Agree with much of what you point out. Keep them coming!
I just recently got a Canon t7 but I didn't know that full frame sensor was better for low light and astrophotography. I didn't know I was going to want to do low light and I was told crop sensor would be fine. Now I have a shot in my head that I don't have the equipment or software to produce... GRRR.... 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣
Haha yeah you could still get away with astrophotography with a crop sensor if you have a fast wide lens like a 1.4 or 2.8, I've taken milky way shots and moon shots with my old 77d and came out good...but yeah generally for those applications definitely go full frame if your budget allows to take advantage of the higher ISO.
It's good to start with and the kit came with a 300mm lens so at least I'll have the glass when I get the money. Great video though I like the format of going for a walk and giving the information, rather than just a talking head video.
Thanks man. I try to mix it up with both. The outdoor vids take about 20 hours per video to plan, travel, film, edit, and upload where the talking head ones take about an hour to fim and edit. I add both on the channel, as I enjoy interaction on different levels with everyone, but I enjoy more the outdoor content. Just takes a lot of time to put it all together lol.
Lol, yeah 90% of wildlife photography can be done without camo. You don't need it to get into the hobby. Certain woodland species and waterfowl definitely benefit from it though. It has its applications for the right subjects.
The best camouflage is a car or a tractor if is possible. Next is behavior. I can't explain, I have no magic recommendation but as I can see my progress I have made many photos of white back of deers and now the deers watch directly into my lens. I did improve nothing specific in my equipments, just learn how to behave.
Here are a few tips for you, Kevin- Try photographing animals from their eye level; birds in flight, like those Pelicans, should be shot when they are low over the water; for the young geese, lie on your belly. When shooting video, mount your camera on a tripod so the scene doesn't look like so erratic. Nobody says there are no good uses for crop-sensor bodies... but they are rarely as good as full-frame bodies. For example, your lens turns into an F9 (approx) at 500mm at 1.6x crop; it's pretty tough to make a bird photo look good at F9. Literally nobody thinks you always need camo to take wildlife photos. Literally nobody thinks you need a tripod for wildlife photography. "...more easier" is incorrect and redundant. "Easier" works fine. Yes, encourage others to take pictures, but don't try to give lessons until you have learned the basics.
If you enjoyed this video, here are some more wildlife photography TIPS th-cam.com/video/ZV-kEJXE4jg/w-d-xo.html
You are so right, I bet 90% of photographer's are hobby, amateur's, enthusiast, and as you said we are out to enjoy the wildlife and getting better at our hobby.
It's not only about the joy of photography but it's also about the challenge of getting that shot that even impresses you.
exactly
For all the keyboard warrior pros who get butt hurt when I said "more reach", of course I know your lens don't magically turn into an 800 prime to give more reach. It just becomes the equivalent, as I stated because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ or megapixel resolution like when cropping in camera, or in post. Or losing light from a teleconverter to give similar results. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" or allusion of a 160-800 equivalent. Of course it's not in a literal sense. Man, a simple word like "reach" triggers people, lmao.
🤣
Yeah, people just want to justify their expensive and heavy full frame gear by shitting on smaller formats.
Well said, most of the warriors probably don’t even have a camera.
Dude if you keep talking like this to people who are easily offended, I’m sorry but I’m going to have to subscribe to you.
Started bird photography about a year ago. And over that time till now I agree with you. No need for a tripod, no need for a full frame camera, no need for camouflage. Using canon 80d that I already owned and added a 150-600 sigma contemporary as lens. It works great. All other gear you want can be added to your inventory later. 🙂 happy photographing
I've been photographing wildlife for almost 60 years. Here's my opinion, for what it's worth. An APS-C camera can sometimes be an advantage, as it gets you optically "closer". Cropping in post can sometimes work if you have the pixels, but being optically "closer" while shooting helps to get the right shot. Camouflage isn't to hide from the animals, it's to hide from other photographers. The last thing you want is another photographer spooking your subject because they spot you in the woods and walk out to see "what you got"!
Finally, any serious amateur or professional photographer is going to eventually wish they had a tripod. You don't have to haul one around everywhere you go, and in fact it would be a mistake and a hindrance to do so, but you can ALWAYS improve image quality by using one, especially in low light. Just something to keep in mind. Plus, if you are using a long, heavy lens, and spending hours with a subject, it is super nice to give your arms a break, and yet still be ready to shoot in an instant.
Valid points Alan. 📸
I've been photographing mostly song birds here in Alaska for a few years and I'm amazed at how fast the warbler family of birds can be as well as how well woodpeckers blend into birch trees. Sad thing is alot of photographers play the "gear game" and say you can't do XXX with certain cameras etc. I miss the days of when you run across a fellow wildlife photographer and you just happily talk shop about what you've seen etc. It feels like alot of people here in Alaska get snotty and secretive and thats just sad and not what I use to love about photography
It is unfortunate
Great 👍 video Kevin very nice editing. Your right a crop sensor comes in very handy
Thanks John
I use a Fujifilm X-S20 with a 70-300mm lens and 1.4X teleconverter. It is small, light and works quite well. I could carry it around all day.
I know this is an older video but on gear, IF you use a large lens (I use a 200-5-- Nikon) you can get a CF monopod and a waverly mono gimbal and just walk with it on your shoulder. A pool noddle and came tape can add extra padding
That's a great idea
In a comparison video I watched recently the R7 did just as well as the R5 for noise at high are eyeshadows.
The r7 isn't too far off for sure. Being a smaller sensor it will have it's flaws, and going into the camera knowing it's limitations will help, but if you do a lot of wildlife (especially birds) the r7 has a lot of benefits. Really any crop APSC like the 90d is very capable. I agree forest, the tech going into these new crop bodies are allowing us to stay out a little longer than the past for APSC
Excellent! I am retired and on a fixed income. I bought a cropped sensor used (Canon R7) and 2 used RF lenses for less than $2500. Yesterday at dawn we had a doe give birth to twin fawns in our Montana pasture and got some great shots from our deck with a $600 (used) Canon RF800 lens (equiv to 1280mm due to the crop sensor).
So cool!
Amen!! You hit it right on the head and I say the same thing.... having fun and being out is the most important part of it!!❤
💯📸
I agree, I use an R7 and a 100-500mm hand held most of the time. I wish other youtubers would embrace your train of thought, I have been a wildlife photographer for a few years now and remember at the start of my journey, getting so confused with all the different information on TH-cam. Well done for saying how it is..
It's a great versatile combo for sure. Thanks for watching
Thank-you. I chose my R7 with the RF 100-500 for birding , and I am thrilled with the results. Modern sensors and denoising software mean that APSC performs as well as full frame from a few years ago for high ISO/ low light situations. Too much of the advice on TH-cam seems antiquated! Thanks for setting the record straight.
For many photographers, APSC is just fine. Go out and shoot is what I say lol. Thanks for watching.
The 10 year old Canon 7D MK 2 fitted with 100-400mm remains a potent wildlife camera. Weather sealed, dual CF & SD card slots, 160-640mm equivalent reach and damn near indestructible.
Enjoying your photography is paramount.
Some of my images are crap. Sometimes I delete them straight away, sometimes I don't. But I still enjoy the experience of getting out in nature, experiencing the environment and just taking photos for my enjoyment. If someone else likes my images, that's a bonus!
I'm enjoying your videos too. Just subscribed.
Thanks man. Yeah i look at it as the experience and the joy of photography sometimes is clouded with our expectations of gear and technique.
Thank you for the video... I know it's more work but showing the aperture/Iso/speed on your nice pictures would be a nice add-on.
Thank you Alan. I will keep that in mind. I'm not sure how that is any significant though as I heavily edit.
The thing about crop censors confuses me. When you say 800mm equivalent, you're not really getting extra "reach", as in being able to see subjects that are further away, right? Isn't it just that it frames the subject in a smaller view versus having to crop in on a photo from a full frame camera?
I mention this in another comment by rooster. It's not a true 800mm focal length like a true 800mm lens. It just becomes the equivalent, because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ when cropping in post. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" of a 160-800 equivalent.
I really liked this video. This good for any gear you might have. I've been a photographer for over 50 years. I personally use canon rebel d1000 xs and t7. My main lens is a 75 300 4 and I think I do quite well with it. I have a tripod but in all my years never for the most part found it that useful. I enjoy photography for what it is. I've had photographers try to tell you how to improve your pictures but I've began to realize if you like it there is no improvement needed. Thanks for that video.
The t7 was one of my first cameras. It's solid choice for sure. And you're right. If YOU like the photo, that's all that matters. Unless you have clients but even then, you have to love your style and your own craft before any client will. Thanks for watching Murray
@@KevinNordstrom I'm pretty much the only one that sees my work anymore. Don't do much pro work anymore. Photography is for me and the fun in it. The t7 is working out well for me. I still use the xs too.
It’s all about the physics of light gathering! There has to be options for everyone at every price point !
You got it. There's the right rig out there for everyone. 📸
Thank you for the video.
I'm committed to DSLRs and prefer old time-tested bodies. Never throw away cameras that are in good working condition. I use Canon 1D Mark IV with 600mm composite prime lens (EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II + EF 2x III). This produces a reach of 780mm on the APS-H body (hope you heard about it). However, for bird flight shots, I use a lighter combo 7D + EF 400mm f/5.6L USM. This produces 640mm reach. Sometimes use the 7D with the 600mm composite combo in order to get 960mm reach when felt necessary.
Thanks again.
I’ve been photographing professionally for over 30 years and I have a full frame and a crop frame. My crop frame is my wildlife body for the exact reason you mention. I tend to use a tripod more now but that is because the older I get I have a harder time holding the camera steady. Great video!
Oh and Camo is my favorite color but honestly I hardly ever wear any.😅
I totally agree Tomas. It's a catch 22 the older we get. We want to go lighter and hand hold or we can't keep steady and need a tripod lol it's a love hate relationship with those things lol 😆 also I enjoy camo too but I rarely wear it unless I'm at the marsh for ducks. thanks for watching and happy shooting. 📸
People have lost the journey of photography and just the simple enjoyment of it
I fully agree 💯
Great format and flow to this video Kevin. God bless you brother.. loved it.
Thanks J. 📸
good video Kevin. Many times it is more about the quality of the experience than the quality of the images. The story the photograph tells is what I find as the most important aspect of wildlife and nature photography. I like the way you think.
Thanks Jeff. Nothing better than being out in creation with our cameras.
Thanks for making the video. One thing I will disagree with you on is the point you made that a crop sensor camera gives you more reach than a full-frame camera. A 500mm lens on a crop sensor camera gives you the same magnification that it does on a full-frame camera, but since the image is cropped you're just seeing less of the image making it appear to be closer. Take care!
Good one Kevin. Like most anything else, when you have been doing something for awhile, one will develop their own likes and dislikes. Be that their equipment or their approach to photography. I found that process to be a lot of fun. Take care now.👍👍
100% Terry. We all find what works for us. Take care brother
Thanks for another uplifting video. I look forward to them each and every week. Tomorrow I’m off searching for Ring-neck and Northern Pintail ducks at a local sewage lagoon. I spotted them today and as usual left my camera at home. When will I learn. Anyways keep up the great work and happy shooting.
Thanks Keith and happy shooting 📸
Then my favourite discussion is the carry straps, the body harness. Here in Africa on a long hike through the bush looking for wildlife you carry your gear in your hand or a simple strap over your shoulder or cross body just to prevent a drop. But you carry your gear in your hand, for action, not for show off. Had a group from USA coming to Botswana the stuff these people brought with them as mind blowing, Accra plates, replacement lens foots, body harnesses, way too much equipment, the endless fiddling at a sighting to decide what camera lens combination to use. I was using one camera with a zoom, the guide was using one camera with a 300 mm prime. I had another camera with a wide angle zoom. Some of them had 3 bodies with 5 lenses, memory cards and batteries all over the place. One morning we told the group for the sake of improving photography, that they were only allowed 1 camera and one lens and take a second body with short lens for wide shots. It was a revelation. I think most of them went back realising they have too much gear, not enough focus on that and how they shoot. have fun, carry less shoot more.
Hi Kevin, I use a 5dm4 and a 7dm2. Since I use DXO PURERAW the APSC camera is my favorit for Wildlife as well as Icehockey. Not afraid about high ISO, fast enough for me and my 150-600 Sigma is a 980mm and the 120-300 2.8 is now a 480mm lence.
Nice set up Wolf
Once again some valuable advice given here .
Thanks David
Started photography 2 years ago with a Nikon D3500 & a 70-300mm. Quickly found myself wanting more for wildlife & birds specifically & upgraded to a Nikon Z5 + Sigma 150-600mm and I shoot handheld consistently. Haven't ever found myself in a situation where I've wanted to bust out the tripod yet.
Great video!
Thanks Owen. It's a fun hobby for sure.
Great video Kevin. My back is not thanking me for carrying my tripod for hours yesterday as I dabbled in some bird photography. I didn’t even use it so lugged it around! I’m using Sony A7IV with 100-400 and it’s light weight enough to carry and no issues with image stabilisation. Also some lovely photos too!!
Awesome brother. Yeah using a tripod the older we get is not fun lol. Glad you got some shots in! 👍
@@KevinNordstrom still learning but we do have some pretty unique birds in Australia so that helps!
Kevin, good stuff as always. Thanks!!!
Thanks Terry
Could you please explain how the 100-500 becomes 800 and the 600 becomes 940? Thank you.
Hey rooster. Hope your day is well. It's not a true 800mm focal length like a true 800mm lens. It just becomes the equivalent, because the smaller sensor in a APSC camera fills the subject more in frame by 1.6x of that of a full frame sensor without losing IQ or megapixel resolution when cropping in post or in camera. So the 100-500 gives the "reach" of a 160-800 equivalent without losing a stop of light or slows down the auto focus as when you put on an teleconverter to get similar results.
When you are using a crop sensor camera, they have a crop factor. With canon you multiply your lens length times 1.6. So at 500mm it becomes 800mm and so on. Hope this helps
Hello Todd. I can answer that question for you. The power of the lense doesn't change, what changes is the appearance of you subject on the crop sensor. Canon cameras which are crop sensor have a factor of 1.6 increase of appearance. You multiply the power of the lense by 1.6 factor and that gives you the appearance of added magnification. A 150-600 zoom lense becomes a 240-960 lense on a crop sensor camera, which as a side note is all I use and all dslr bodies (4 Canon bodies).
There a many videos which can explain the process alot better then I did but I hope this helps.
So the need for a 1.4 or 2.0 teleconverter is negligible with a crop sensor camera? Why risk putting your image through more glass? I have a 100-400 and just try to get as close as I can.
I personally avoid using converters on my zoom lenses due to the increase f stop and the extra glass to shoot though. However I do use both my 1.4 and my 2x Sigma converters on my Sigma 500mm f4 depending on the circumstances. Leaving in 4 days for a week in Yellowstone and hoping my big glass gets a workout.
I agree on all accounts!
😁
The images & video I have Seen Doesn't Look That great sir, not be rude. Maybe You Might need a tripod / Monopod. Quite A few Images Were Soft & Video Out Of Focus. All the best 👍🏻
Works for me 👍
Thanks for watching, and happy shooting 📸🏕️ 🦅
Great video 🙂👍
I really thought that I would miss my crop sensor when I moved to full frame, but it's not that bad. I do find my self switching to crop mode occasionally, but it's pretty rare. Definitely agree about the tripod, I often have it, but rarely use it. As for camo, I've never used it, so I can't vouch for whether or not it would help me, but I think I'm doing okay, mostly. Great video brother, keep it up. God bless.
Thanks Craig. Yeah I use both FF and Crop. I'm going to upgrade my RP to the r5ii or the R1, and the R7 as my 2nd body in the field. Both are great for sure. Just pointing out the benefits of APSC for wildlife. Thanks for continued support and God bless! 📸
Good info, thanks. But one question? you seem to be using in the video a canon RP full frame camera, which seems to be a little odd considering you are promoting APSC cameras. Also that camera is not listed in your gear list.
I have both APSC and full frame. I never said one was better than the other. I'm simply saying why apsc is a solid choice. Just because it's not the camera used in the video, is irrelevant to the info provided. As for the RP not being in my gear list, it is in alot of my older videos. I'm in the process of upgrading from the RP to the R1 and having another r7 as my backup and giving my RP to my daughter.
I have and never will promote one system or brand etc.. being better than another. Thanks for watching and happy shooting 📸
@@KevinNordstrom makes sense thanks for your reply. Your videos are great just come across you. Keep in up the good work 👍
Really interesting video Kevin. I almost agree with you, even though there isn't a real rule, and for every situation there are pros and cons. Usually I prefer to use a tripod, as well as camouflage stuff. About apsc cameras, I'm totally with you, even though brands tend to not make apsc lenses, so usually we bought apsc cameras, but we use them with full frame lenses!! It's quite weird in my opinion. Now I'm using only full frame cameras because I love landscape photography as well, and sometimes I love taking pictures of the Milky Way, and in situation like that full frame sensors are better.
I have shot with apsc cameras since I started and really got into photography back in 2016. This is also the year my current camera came out which is Nikon D500.
My favourite genre of photography is wildlife it's also the genre that I'm best at. I agree with all your points as this is pretty much my style. Though in the UK at least it is beneficial to at least where dull colours and green tones. Most birds and wildlife here can be very skittish. The only times where I use camo or use a tripod in wildlife photography is if I'm targeting a specific species and I'm hidden and waiting for my subject to show up. The myth of you needing a full frame really is just that. I belong to a camera club and I place above full frame users frequently and recently won best wildlife image above club lvl. This isn't just my opinion these are images being judged by very experienced and qualified judges. While full frame might be a better choice in certain circumstances it does not mean you can't get a shot without full frame.
Totally agree Baz. Congratulations on the photo winning. Nature and wildlife Photography is a life long hobby and so many (myself included) can get wrapped up so much in the gear that we forget it's about the experience first. Happy shooting 📸
Thanks for your amazing educational videos. I’ve got a question for you because I see you are a canon R and I have the same camera and I hope you can help. Sometimes when I’m out in nature, I tend to try different shooting modes, including auto, just to see a different perspective. I however noticed that if my shutter on auto mode goes higher, the shutter release is faster and there isn’t a lag at all. When I try the same exact settings or even higher shutter speed on shutter priority mode or even manual and flexible priority mode, the shutter release is slower and feels like there is a lag even if I’m on high speed drive mode. What could be the issue here? Thanks a lot.
First time to the channel, thanks for the efforts, shots, video. I love my D500 APSC 1.5x crop body. I do own a D850 - but the low purrr of the shutter on the D500 and slightly higher frame rate and less weight were always pluses - and some of my best award winning shots were with that camera - because it is what I was using when the event happened. I'm not a professional, but the 1.5X Nikon/Sony or 1.6x crop for Canon is just that - a crop - technically, not more effective reach - no, I'm not one of those. So, I'll let it go there. As for camouflage, I would agree for what I shoot. Typically, holding your position long enough is enough to do the trick (not to mention, shooting silently). Last year I photographed a white egret in flight headed across the water when it banked and headed right at the camera/lens/me. My AF and tracking followed the bird flawlessly until the bird clearly got within the minimum focus distance (you can image the image in the EVF). A big white blob and then, wait for it, a thump. I very slowly looked up from the viewfinder to find the white egret sitting on my long lens (Tripod mounted on the ground). I was thinking "You've got to be kidding me". As for handholding vs tripod - not sure this one is as much MYTH as it is preference or shooting style. As you know, having a kit that can be handheld, frees you up with respect to where you go, what you can do to frame a shot, and ultimately what kind of shot you get. That freedom has a lot going for it. There are many shots that win wildlife photography contests (if that's your thing) that are not tripod bound. The quality glass that you speak of that is light, great VR, and flexible is not going to come cheap. Then again, it's not cheap if you put it on a tripod either ;-) Nice composition, time line story board, and thanks for keeping it tight, to the point, and b-roll splices. Well done. Agree with much of what you point out. Keep them coming!
Thank you dance.
Five years ago all the "experts" were toting around tripods. Today, I hardly see anyone with one. Good tips, video needs work. Very dark. :)
Thanks yeah hand held is becoming more convenient with lighter gear
I just recently got a Canon t7 but I didn't know that full frame sensor was better for low light and astrophotography. I didn't know I was going to want to do low light and I was told crop sensor would be fine. Now I have a shot in my head that I don't have the equipment or software to produce... GRRR.... 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣
Haha yeah you could still get away with astrophotography with a crop sensor if you have a fast wide lens like a 1.4 or 2.8, I've taken milky way shots and moon shots with my old 77d and came out good...but yeah generally for those applications definitely go full frame if your budget allows to take advantage of the higher ISO.
It's good to start with and the kit came with a 300mm lens so at least I'll have the glass when I get the money. Great video though I like the format of going for a walk and giving the information, rather than just a talking head video.
Thanks man. I try to mix it up with both. The outdoor vids take about 20 hours per video to plan, travel, film, edit, and upload where the talking head ones take about an hour to fim and edit. I add both on the channel, as I enjoy interaction on different levels with everyone, but I enjoy more the outdoor content. Just takes a lot of time to put it all together lol.
Makes sense, I will take advantage of all the help and tips I can get so, talking head or nature walk I'm listening LOL
Good job Kevin. Enjoyed the video.
thanks Chuck
Truth bombs! Got a subscriber 😊
Thanks 👍
Dress head to toe in Camo, and then point a shiny round, reflective piece of glass at right at the bird. 😅
Lol, yeah 90% of wildlife photography can be done without camo. You don't need it to get into the hobby. Certain woodland species and waterfowl definitely benefit from it though. It has its applications for the right subjects.
The best camouflage is a car or a tractor if is possible. Next is behavior. I can't explain, I have no magic recommendation but as I can see my progress I have made many photos of white back of deers and now the deers watch directly into my lens. I did improve nothing specific in my equipments, just learn how to behave.
@@milvusotis yep 💯
The myth that you cant use / or buy a lens that is twice the price of your camera.
Totally! 💯 📸
Dude, you need a tripod to keep these videos stable... 😅
I need a lot more than that 😂
Here are a few tips for you, Kevin-
Try photographing animals from their eye level; birds in flight, like those Pelicans, should be shot when they are low over the water; for the young geese, lie on your belly.
When shooting video, mount your camera on a tripod so the scene doesn't look like so erratic.
Nobody says there are no good uses for crop-sensor bodies... but they are rarely as good as full-frame bodies. For example, your lens turns into an F9 (approx) at 500mm at 1.6x crop; it's pretty tough to make a bird photo look good at F9.
Literally nobody thinks you always need camo to take wildlife photos.
Literally nobody thinks you need a tripod for wildlife photography.
"...more easier" is incorrect and redundant. "Easier" works fine.
Yes, encourage others to take pictures, but don't try to give lessons until you have learned the basics.
Great tips Glen! 📸