Square Roots, Cube Roots, and Other Roots

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 178

  • @dontstealmydiamondsv3156
    @dontstealmydiamondsv3156 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    That dopamine hit when getting the right answer never gets old

  • @karms1500
    @karms1500 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I'm about to begin calculus but I'm going through this amazing 'All Of It' playlist to fully understand everything from arithmetic, instead of just relying on memorization and to eliminate any bad habits I've developed. You make math fun even with these short videos and explain everything so well. Can't thank you enough @ProfessorDaveExplains

    • @aarenthegamer1835
      @aarenthegamer1835 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm also doing the same way because in engineering we use this kind of equation specially in integration

    • @edmundoandrade5113
      @edmundoandrade5113 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@aarenthegamer1835what do engineers do? Can you build a gun?

    • @XoLucyna
      @XoLucyna 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@edmundoandrade5113 engineering, the word itself means to create, build, design, invent something that is to engineer something. You can build a gun with just a rubber band, everyone has a hidden engineer in them. If you can think it you can make it, if you make it you have an engineer in you.

  • @hellfrozen9971
    @hellfrozen9971 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    This one's hard to wrap your head around

    • @karma1507
      @karma1507 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      For the answers at the end:
      √16 is 4 x 4 which is how you get 4 as the answer
      √50 is 5 x 5 x 2 expressed as 5√2. If you can't get the square root of a number by multiplying a smaller number by itself, there's 1 extra number you need to multiply it by to get it.
      √300 = 10 x 10 x 3 which is written as 10√3
      √243 = 9 x 9 x 3 = 9√3
      The number you multiply by itself is written once before the square root and the total after multiplying is multiplied by the number in the square root to get the final answer.

    • @uzairmalik007
      @uzairmalik007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@karma1507 Thanks man.

    • @karma1507
      @karma1507 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@uzairmalik007 You're welcome.

    • @tornadomash00
      @tornadomash00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@karma1507 that's actually super helpful for me thanks bro

    • @gowthambv6406
      @gowthambv6406 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karma1507 why not plus or minus 5√2 coz -√5×-√5×√2=√50

  • @Kain987
    @Kain987 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    It's kind of funny... back when I was in school, while good at math, i didn't really pursue it past just getting decent grades and moving on...
    Now here I am, 25 years later, recapping all of this stuff for both entertainment and due to the frustration that most of it is locked away in some brain dungeon since I've barely used more than arithmetic and basic algebra ever since finishing high-school. I pursued social sciences, but heck, I have engineer friends who can relate.
    And now I'm brushing up on this because in some years time, when my daughter starts school, she might want to ask me about math... and I'll be damned if I'll ever be one of those parents that dismisses my child's questions because I don't know and am too stubborn to find out and help.
    Regardless, math is a lot more fun when it's not compulsory...

  • @cdpalmo
    @cdpalmo ปีที่แล้ว +11

    im halfway through this playlist, you’re a lifesaver prof

  • @vaishanthjv2519
    @vaishanthjv2519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The radical sign(√) refers to the principal square root of a number. So √9 = 3.
    Square root of 9 is both 3 and -3, when using the radical sign it is the non-negative real root.
    you can use x^(1/2) or ±√3 to refer to both the roots.

  • @jamacianv1ncecuh882
    @jamacianv1ncecuh882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Thanks a million professor Dave I wouldn't be good at math if it was not for you thanks a million professor Dave.l learn a lot of lessons from you and have half a book of notes

    • @pamelafrancis4476
      @pamelafrancis4476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree, Professor Dave is a genius in his straight-to-the point presentation. He is a gift to maths students.

  • @deesnuty
    @deesnuty 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I regret not listening to my grade 1-10 teachers

    • @RosemaryDiva
      @RosemaryDiva 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here ,now am suffering 😞

    • @JasuminIya-k5z
      @JasuminIya-k5z หลายเดือนก่อน

      Me too bro... :CC

  • @timsn274
    @timsn274 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Square roots are a function from the non-negative reals to the non-negative reals. The square root of 9 is 3. The solutions to x^2=9 are 3 and -3.

    • @Vernacularpressact
      @Vernacularpressact 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah totally

    • @Mswordx23
      @Mswordx23 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Almost. The radical sign in particular is that. But the term "square root" can mean the positive square root or the negative square root, or both.

    • @timsn274
      @timsn274 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mswordx23 That is why I generally use the '1/2-power' instead, which includes both.

    • @saintmay1952
      @saintmay1952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I pointed that out, and my comment got deleted.

  • @takebacktheholyland9306
    @takebacktheholyland9306 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Funnily enough, I completely forgot 100 was a perfect square and took the harder route to √300 by answering it as 5√12 because 300 = (12x25) √25 = 5

  • @tramarthomas6105
    @tramarthomas6105 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quick tip I learned from a channel called Let's do math on fast long division that allows for easy mental division. Take 243 and I really a factor from it. It's an odd number, we can tell from the unites place having 3, so we divide by 3 which is a prime number. 3 divide by 2, it doesn't go into it so we carry the 2 move and treat the next number as 24. 3 divided by 24 is 8, then 3 divided by 3 is 1, so 81. It'd like like 0, then 08 then 081 on paper. If instead of 243 we had 343 and we divided by 3, then on the first step we'd get 1, and treat the 4 as if it's a regular 4. 3 goes into 4 once and we carry the remainder and treat the next number as 13. 3 goes into it 4 times and we have 114 remainder 1

  • @RichardRoy2
    @RichardRoy2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Damn, it would have been great to have you around way back when. I love looking at different ways of presenting an idea. You never know when you're going to hit upon an approach that glues what was once a seemingly disjointed set of ideas together clearly. There's a lot of material I missed in school in this video alone. Thanks.

  • @abednegobitrus5133
    @abednegobitrus5133 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thanks much Sir now I know that everything is possible you are truly the maths Messiah

  • @fnkymnk_
    @fnkymnk_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Hello professor, Can you make a video on the proof of trigononetric ratios of combined angle

  • @Snyp7777
    @Snyp7777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Such a lifesaver! Cheers bud

  • @ckarcher4504
    @ckarcher4504 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    8:25 the answers should have ± ???

  • @shreyam.b8436
    @shreyam.b8436 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly it's helping me a lot, it's been a weeks I'm daily watching it nd I am soo eager to finish all the videos till last.. because my brain is going to work nd I will not be anymore average student 🥹, nd the most interesting is this all the videos are just amazing nd short which creates more interest nd thinks as it's easy, for any students who wants to start with basic.. thank you soo much, you are like a god that you helped a lot.. because maths is a subject where you need a deep understanding nd basic clear to understand the advance level equations or whatever it is..

  • @Temporaryfiction
    @Temporaryfiction 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i love the intro 😂

    • @Anuj-ji3cj
      @Anuj-ji3cj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I too🤚😅

  • @shahabbaloch8338
    @shahabbaloch8338 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    there are many methods to find square roots.Like prime factorization or long division
    what is the easiest and best of all?

    • @NickHope
      @NickHope 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Electronic calculator

    • @jesse2367
      @jesse2367 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NickHope Ha!

  • @GamerSaga
    @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    not sure of your experience with this but i was curious about the math involved in game development. i am not sure if there are only specific parts of areas like alegbra, trig and cal that you need to know for programming games or if understanding all formulas and concepts are needed. just pretty slow at grasping math though your videos do help out alot, easy explanations and just long enough for those with low attention spans. any thoughts and advice?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ooh sorry i don't really know anything about programming!

    • @xx03_p19
      @xx03_p19 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You'll need to know: 'Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Calculus, Linear Algebra, and a little bit of Newtonian physics'. Unless you want to be constrained by the standard-setting of your game engine, it will require you to understand how objects move through space. For Mobile and Web Programming you could get away with basics algebra but being well-rounded in Math is always useful no matter what type of computer programmer you want to be!

    • @caronfernandes4625
      @caronfernandes4625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains im really surprised that you don't know programming since you know so many scientific topics. Anyway learning programming will be a piece of cake for you.

  • @fizzincore817
    @fizzincore817 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for making these easy to understand videos I got a c in algebra 1 and this is going to help with algebra 2.

  • @lordfarquad2150
    @lordfarquad2150 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! This is actually really fun! Although, I feel stupid having to re-learn all of this in my mid 20's

  • @Edray13
    @Edray13 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    simply an excellent explanation

  • @dbleR
    @dbleR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    God, I know that this is the simplest explanation I can get anywhere but damn, my brain hurts even though I am very motivated to learn. Understanding the roots proved to be difficult for me even though I watched this for the 4th or 5th time(?) Maybe I am too stupid lol.

    • @CuriousBiscuit
      @CuriousBiscuit 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You aren't stupid. Believe in yourself!

    • @pamelafrancis4476
      @pamelafrancis4476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      there are other videos that "go around the houses" with longer explanations. I have to write every single step down, look at other ways of presentation then come back. It will make sense with plenty of practice examples (so I am told!) Good luck.

    • @shannen9980
      @shannen9980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I know its been a while but for anyone maybe struggeling i looked at the info of 3√x^2 = x^2/3...
      So the reason for this is if you look at x=4 we can put this in the equasion
      2√8^2 = 8^2/3. The reason why this is the same is we can start by the first step amd just look at 3√8^2. 8^2 = 64. So that leaves 3√64. The cube root of 64 is 4. (4×4×4= 64). ×=4
      If we go to 8^2/3 this is the complicated part. You can first cube root the 8 which makes 2 (2×2×2).
      This leaves (2^3)^2/3. By the rules you can make this 2^3 ×^ 2/3. If we now only look at 3 × 2/3 it will make sense 2/3 + 2/3 + 2/3 =6 /3 = 2. And since it was raised this will make 2^2 which is 4 which makes x=4. Sorry if this was long but hope it helped anyone

  • @Zone_Ranger
    @Zone_Ranger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you use the radical sign you are asking for the principal square root (the non-negative square root of the number). So while the square root of 4 is +2 and -2, the radical of 4 has only one answer 2 .

  • @GamerSaga
    @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hello, not sure if you have been asked this before. thanks to simple videos like these math can actually be fun to learn. though I am bit stuck, while with practice I am understanding how things are solved. but I am always wonder what these different equations and formulas can be applied to rather then just solving random problems. have any tips or advice?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      pretty much everything! the universe is math, as is everything in it.

    • @GamerSaga
      @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      so is it really about memorizing and practice then?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      it's just about making all the math really intuitive so that you can understand how it describes the physical world when you study science, and how to use math to make predictions and build things and what not.

    • @GamerSaga
      @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ah thanks

    • @davinderarora8592
      @davinderarora8592 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Will square root of 16 be +-4 ,or just simply 4?
      As in checking comprehenision you have assigned all square roots positive value rather than positive/negative value

  • @SameerSk
    @SameerSk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Professor sir please do stuff on permutations and combinations sir

  • @christopherbecker7417
    @christopherbecker7417 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recognize the steps and how to do them, but for some reason have such a hard time conceptualizing math. I’ve gone up to calc 2 just trusting that the rules I’ve learned work and essentially memorizing all the Interacting parts, but when I try to do something like visualize what 4 to the 1/3 power really looks like it scrambles my brain and leaves me feeling like I really don’t know mathematics.

  • @predatorsgaminghd4337
    @predatorsgaminghd4337 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello professor can you please explain deeply about the anomeric Carbon found in carbohydrates and about the mutarotation!!

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      this is a math tutorial, silly! and i have a tutorial on that in my biochemistry series.

    • @pauljohnson570
      @pauljohnson570 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Sorry, something not related to maths again, but can you please debate Kaleb FE on flat earth because that guys needs knocking down a peg or five. Be sure to mention his electric gravity theory if you do, because that's hilarious (very easy to negate an electric force and thus gravity). And one last thing, could dark matter be the actual fabric of space that is bent by masses? I have loads of other questions. Such as do atoms contain hidden information (variable and programming as such)? Yes, they do - otherwise how would a spider know how to spin a web? How can male/female attraction work without that atomic level programming (for want of a better word). I have a million more questions but I better shut up now ...

  • @SngBrd86
    @SngBrd86 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't know how you're on my subscription feed. Not complaining, just found it to be odd. I feel a little smarter today! Thanks from SFV.

  • @NoahEbanks-j3v
    @NoahEbanks-j3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can someone show their work for the Checking Comprehension questions! im not to sure on what formula to use or even how to start to figure out what the square root of 50 is! HELP

  • @saralverma4739
    @saralverma4739 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please do work on permutations qnd commutation and binomial theorem

  • @Blazqe
    @Blazqe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy is a complete legend.

  • @bullpup1337
    @bullpup1337 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is an example where mathematicians should get their act together and agree on a consensus. In Germany, only the positive values are considered roots. Sometimes, a distinction between root and root function or radical is made. You don't make the distinction. It's confusing....

    • @thegoodlydragon7452
      @thegoodlydragon7452 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's weird. If only the positive value is considered the root, how do you deal with the fact that the negative answer works too?

  • @user-eb4tg4gd6w
    @user-eb4tg4gd6w ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never thought that a guy that looks like a discord admin (no offense) would make me 10x smarter than i was literally 3 days ago, thanks man.

  • @snowgibson1856
    @snowgibson1856 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok. I understand what you're saying, and I did the questions and got them right. But. Logically it doesn't completely make sense...
    Wouldn't the answers be squared? Doesn't 9^2√3 make more sense than just 9√3?
    and also... how come it wouldn't be expressed as 9^2(3)? Wouldn't that make more sense than 9√3?
    I'm genuinely curious. It took me a while to wrap my head around it to begin with. I'm glad I can calculate it now... but I wish it made logical sense in my head

  • @قائدرشو-ض1و
    @قائدرشو-ض1و 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have an equation like the first in the video but 18 is under the root ... What is the solution?

    • @Alex-02
      @Alex-02 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you mean x^2=18 you would do it like this:
      x=sqrt(18)
      x=sqrt(9*2)
      x=scrt(9)*scrt(2)
      x=3*scrt(2)

  • @ក្រាំង
    @ក្រាំង ปีที่แล้ว

    Why sometimes we subtract X with a number and sometimes we subtract only X from that number in algebra?

  • @chourouk-gr9qg
    @chourouk-gr9qg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ty

  • @Mr.Paheli.131
    @Mr.Paheli.131 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    √50 =7√1 sir is it wrong or correct?

    • @Mr.Paheli.131
      @Mr.Paheli.131 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes brother, right answer is 5√2

    • @Mr.Paheli.131
      @Mr.Paheli.131 ปีที่แล้ว

      @TERA EDGE - تيرا ادج
      3-x=17
      -x+3=17
      -x+3-3=17-3
      -x=14
      x=-14 Answer, very tricky question brother 🔥

    • @luish1498
      @luish1498 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      √50=√(2*5*5)= √ (2*5^2) = 5√2

    • @luish1498
      @luish1498 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr.Paheli.131 3-x=17
      3=17+X
      3-17=X
      X=-14

    • @Mr.Paheli.131
      @Mr.Paheli.131 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luish1498 yes brother you are correct

  • @LucasXD...995
    @LucasXD...995 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u

  • @alokbarik713
    @alokbarik713 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why in the answers in the comprehension are not given in +-

    • @chiklachikla7641
      @chiklachikla7641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He didnt explains it in this video but although we have 2 square for every nonnegative real numbers we only take the positive one and it is called the principal square root we dont write the negative solution unless we are solving equation that we need to take the square on both of the equation hope did explains it well

    • @0Coeus
      @0Coeus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To expand on Chikla Chiklas answer: There is a reason we have a "principal square root" and only consider the positive value when taking the square root.
      Consider the equation x^2=16. "Solving" this equation means finding all the values of x that will make the equality true. Both x = 4 and x = -4 will work, and you can convince yourself of this by replacing x with this values in the original equation.
      Now consider the operation sqrt(x) like we have in the comprehension exersices. For every value of x you choose, you get a number back. This is what we call a function, and we decide that it is important that for every x we pick, we get only one number back. Why do we decide this? Because otherwise the function is not very usefull to us. So while both +4 and -4 is a perfectly good answer to sqrt(16), we can only pick one, and so we pick 4 because historically we are biased towards positive numbers :)
      So while the two cases might at first seem the same (you solve the equation by taking the square root of both sides for instance), they are in fact seperate although related consepts.
      PS. this might seem very pedantic and confusing when only reading about it, but makes much more intuitive sense if you graph (draw) the equation and function in a graphing calculator like GeoGebra or Desmos.

  • @pramodm5542
    @pramodm5542 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome sir

  • @user-zo3wy4we3t
    @user-zo3wy4we3t 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No technique for square root long division? And other root long division?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Taking a root is not the same thing as division so I'm not sure what you're asking.

  • @omerkaya545
    @omerkaya545 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shouldn't the answers to the question in the end be +/-?

  • @lianyas
    @lianyas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can someone explain to me
    (roots as afractional exponents )

  • @masonsteven77
    @masonsteven77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're awesome, dude.

  • @jyotimishra9936
    @jyotimishra9936 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thnkuuu

  • @Mywmca
    @Mywmca 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your mathematics are special because there wear not get any thingggg

  • @christinamarie2504
    @christinamarie2504 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love your videos!!

  • @alyxkrieger6764
    @alyxkrieger6764 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oooo Shoot :O I'm gettin' it, Thx Prof. Dave!!

  • @Ceevxuks
    @Ceevxuks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a bit confused as to how he instantly went to 3/6 and 2/6 can someone explain?
    Minute: 7:35

    • @melon7247
      @melon7247 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i think multiply both denominators first (2 and 3) then proceed to cross multiply for the numerators

  • @saintmay1952
    @saintmay1952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A comment of mine seems to have been deleted, was I wrong in pointing what I did?

  • @infinitysend
    @infinitysend ปีที่แล้ว

    The sqrt function has only the primary root.
    ✓9=3 not -3

  • @Ramu9119
    @Ramu9119 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    man great video

  • @rhonaengelnulada
    @rhonaengelnulada 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it ok if the answer on √243 is 3√27?

    • @Jeff_Segal
      @Jeff_Segal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Almost but not quite. How would you simplify √27?

    • @adflicto1
      @adflicto1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Jeff_Segal √27=√9 * √3= 3√3

  • @stoicops
    @stoicops ปีที่แล้ว

    things went from cheese to biriani real fast in this video

  • @GamerSaga
    @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    question if with square root of 50 lets say. shouldnt the square root be under the symbol and the cube be outside. like 5\2 then 25 times 2 on the outside? or does it really not matter which way it is writen?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      sorry i don't understand the question!

    • @GamerSaga
      @GamerSaga 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      all good never mind i think i figured it out.

  • @itszyzzbrah4469
    @itszyzzbrah4469 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey prof., how were you able to x^10/12 at around 7:49? I understand about x^3/12 but I'm stuck with the numerator one..

    • @jonesifier
      @jonesifier 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Multiplying by 2 and 3

    • @redsnabba4947
      @redsnabba4947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      as explained in the video he wanted to get the lowest common denominator (12) to compare the x^(5/6) with the divisor x^(1/4)
      you can get that by multiplying the x^(5/6) with 2 as x^(10/12) is the same.
      he then multiplied x^(1/4) with 3 to get the same exponent 12 which is x^(3/12) and that's how you get the numbers shown on the video

  • @nukedcarbon
    @nukedcarbon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much professor dave!

  • @roberttrisca8210
    @roberttrisca8210 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do we use square roots and not just rasing to the power of 1 over 2?

  • @olympiadwainekhytep.4123
    @olympiadwainekhytep.4123 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to simplify √5 by prime factorization?

    • @0Coeus
      @0Coeus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      5 is already prime, so there is no way to further factorize (caveat for the pedantic youtube commenters: in the set of real numbers)

    • @StanbyMode
      @StanbyMode 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      5 is already prime

    • @codexcodexcodex
      @codexcodexcodex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      5 is already a prime number

  • @inyxdream501
    @inyxdream501 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did x^10/12 / x^3/12 became x^7/12 anyone explain

    • @alytella
      @alytella 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because you want to simplify it and get rid of the fraction so you subtract x^3/12 from x^10/12 which will be x^7/12

  • @nikoladragon5255
    @nikoladragon5255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For √243 could 3√27 be an answer?

    • @redsnabba4947
      @redsnabba4947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that's a good partial solution but you can still simplify √27 into 3√3 so you have 3(3√3) thus you get the result show on the screen

    • @ridmicmeena4123
      @ridmicmeena4123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@redsnabba4947 how did you do it can you explain in detail ??

    • @ridmicmeena4123
      @ridmicmeena4123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@redsnabba4947 why did you take 27

    • @a.v.w.6453
      @a.v.w.6453 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ridmicmeena4123 The original poster commented 3√27 as their answer for √243. This answer is incomplete.
      Let's simplify √243. I'll walk you through the steps and after that we'll evaluate where the original poster likely went wrong, alright?
      So, what do we know about √243? Let's list it off:
      - We know it is the number, that, when multiplied by itself, makes 243.
      - 243 isn't a perfect square. We can tell, because numbers that end in 2, 3, 7 or 8 are never perfect squares.
      - √243 can probably be simplified, because we don't like having big numbers under the √ symbol if we can help it. We want to make that number as small as possible and 243 is pretty big.
      Now... what can we divide 243 by to make it smaller? If we divide it by 1, we still have 243. We can't divide it by 2 because it's uneven. What about 3? 243/3 gives us 81. In other words, √243 is the same as √(3*81).
      Another way this can be written is √3 * √81. This makes sense because when you think about it, writing (3*81) means the same as writing 1*(3*81). When you write something between parentheses in math, there is an implied "1 times" in front of it. We just don't write it down because it's superfluous. But when you remember that it's there, you can easily solve for √(3*81), because it becomes √1(3*81). √1*3 = √3 and √1*81 = √81. So, √(3*81) = √3 * √81.
      Can we simplify this? Yes, we can. 81 is on our times table. It is the product of 9 and 9. This makes it a perfect square.
      √3*√81 = √3*9. We cannot simplify √3 because it is a prime number, and we like to put our whole numbers in front of our radicals when we multiply them, so our final answer is 9√3. It is not 3*3√3, because we can solve for 3*3.
      ----------------------
      So how did OP get 3√27? Well, that's because the way we just did it isn't the only way to get the answer.
      What else can 243 be divided by? Not 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8, but there's 9. 243/9 = 27.
      "A-ha!" the original poster probably thought, "that makes √(9 * 27), or √9 * √27, and 9 is a perfect square! √9 * √27 = 3*√27, or 3√27. I am done now."
      But they weren't done, because 27 is not the smallest number you can get under the √ symbol and that's what we want.
      What can we divide 27 by? 3 and 9, right? So, 3√27 = 3√(3*9).
      Remembering that implied "1 times" before parentheses, we solve: 3√(3*9) = 3*√1(3*9). That's 3*√3*√9. We know that 9 is a perfect square, so 3*√3*√9 = 3*√3*3.
      PEMDAS says we can multiply these values in any order we want and get the same answer, meaning we can solve for 3*3 and get 9*√3. We take away the multiplication symbol because it is unnecessary and our final answer is 9√3.
      Different approach, same answer.

    • @a.v.w.6453
      @a.v.w.6453 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm going to refer you to my answer to Ridmic Meena above. I hope this helps!

  • @aereisSlapper
    @aereisSlapper ปีที่แล้ว

    literally never understood sqrts until 9th grade

  • @tGoldenPhoenix
    @tGoldenPhoenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Done.

  • @agen770
    @agen770 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    √27 is 5.1615242270

  • @wafualex7930
    @wafualex7930 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:44 how??????😭😭

    • @chourouk-gr9qg
      @chourouk-gr9qg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      5/6-1/4

    • @user-tt8xu2gl3o
      @user-tt8xu2gl3o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lowest common multiple of the denominators 6 and 4 is 12
      6 (2) = 12
      4 (3) = 12
      and you just multiply their numerators the same amount
      5 (2) = 10
      therefore
      10/12
      1(3) = 3
      therefore
      3/12
      since they now have common denominators they can be subtracted
      10/12 - 3/12 = 7/12

  • @chilledcarrot796
    @chilledcarrot796 หลายเดือนก่อน

    am I the only one who finds the intro condescending? It feels like it was made for 3 year olds lmao.

  • @mamadwali4278
    @mamadwali4278 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤

  • @michaelfuxeklint4909
    @michaelfuxeklint4909 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're sure it ain't the contrary ? 🤔🤔🤔

  • @aninditarinighosh920
    @aninditarinighosh920 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are teaching wrong. Root(4)=2... not plus minus does not appear here. When x^2=4 then x=+_2

  • @maahirsharma2001
    @maahirsharma2001 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir you need to improve the level.It took me 0.6 seconds to solve all these.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ok buddy, everyone is at a different level with math! this tutorial is for people who are not familiar with this concept. i promise that eventually i'll be doing math that you find challenging.

    • @maahirsharma2001
      @maahirsharma2001 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Professor Dave Explains Thanks sir.Also try to include a bit of SAT related problems.

    • @amarynthia2990
      @amarynthia2990 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      there are already a lot of challenging questions out there. answer those, because people like me is still developing my math skills. no hate, just saying.

    • @dontbugmepleasethanks
      @dontbugmepleasethanks ปีที่แล้ว

      "I have a lamborghini and find toyota camry's too easy to race!"