Fali S Nariman Interview: 50th Year Of "Basic Structure" Doctrine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 เม.ย. 2023
  • On the 50th year of the “Basic Structure” doctrine that restricts the power of Parliament to alter the fundamental features of the Constitution, veteran senior advocate Fali Nariman expressed confidence that the doctrine, which is now “cemented” in the Constitution, is here to stay. Listen to his exclusive interview with The Indian Express.
    #falinariman #constitution
    .
    .
    Watch Out Our Weekly Shows:
    Political Pulse - • Political Pulse
    Express Explained In 60 Seconds - • Express Explained In 6...
    Zero Hour with Derek O' Brien - • Zero Hour with Derek O...
    Indian Express Explained - • Indian Express Explained
    #News #IndiaNews #LatestNews #BreakingNews #DailyNews #NewsHealines #NewsHour #EnglishNews
    The Indian Express Online covers all trending and latest news across India, which includes daily news, political news, gadgets and Mobile reviews, technology updates, Entertainment News, Bollywood news, public opinions and views on daily trends.
    Connect with us:
    Facebook: / indianexpress
    Twitter: / indianexpress
    Indian Express App: indianexpress.com/apps/
    Official Website: indianexpress.com/ Today's Indian Express newspaper offers a comprehensive package of news, including Indian Express editorial analysis and Indian Express analysis today. This well-respected publication covers a wide range of topics in its India Express editorial and Indian Express news sections. Stay informed with the Indian Express newspaper today.

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @sunityranighosh5711
    @sunityranighosh5711 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    In a democracy rule of law must prevail...preamble of Indian constitution is the democracy.....

  • @sharadpanse2660
    @sharadpanse2660 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Excellent!
    As Chief Justice Hughes said, "We are under the Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is".

  • @onkarchadha
    @onkarchadha ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Beauty in our written constitution above the parliament as also the judiciary - but in preambles, justice is the umbrela.This makes India a great nation because of it's people who have inherrited such an all encompassing CONSTITUTION where no power of the parliament can alter the Basic Structure Doctrine well explained by Mr Fali Nariman.Jai Hind

  • @neelamdevi3150
    @neelamdevi3150 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    We need this kind of people, not like Modi , these are the real people who think about common man , true guardian of Indian constitution

  • @Vidushi_07
    @Vidushi_07 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you mam & sir for such information ❤❤

  • @IM_NO_BODY_
    @IM_NO_BODY_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Super 🔥🔥

  • @pany167
    @pany167 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sooo nicely explained

  • @pavitsohal6067
    @pavitsohal6067 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the great lion of our legal system

  • @sandeeptekwar358
    @sandeeptekwar358 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The great constitutionalist

  • @WakilSaheb-dz7mh
    @WakilSaheb-dz7mh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks 🙏. By Adv Dilip Pawar

  • @chandrawatp2123
    @chandrawatp2123 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👌

  • @homosapien6414
    @homosapien6414 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All credit to Nanebhoy palkhiwala

  • @srinivasaiyer22
    @srinivasaiyer22 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The eminent Lawyer forgets that with Basic Structure Doctrine in place Indira Gandhi could devastate the scheme of basic structure ; Whtere was the Supreme Court at that time?

    • @aprajitaaprajita204
      @aprajitaaprajita204 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The basic structure doctrine was propounded because Indira Gandhi misused her power. What’s the problem here?

  • @rakeshdubey1587
    @rakeshdubey1587 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best

  • @shankarcg786
    @shankarcg786 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Then Mr Fali Nariman must also answer How the word "secular" was added in the hallowed preamble in 1976 when half the opposition was in Jail 😅 during emergency

  • @stblog7838
    @stblog7838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍

  • @shanish985
    @shanish985 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi hi hi 📡📡📡📡

  • @existential_bengali
    @existential_bengali 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sovereignty belongs to the people of India. And with its elected representatives in the parliament, sovereign people of India has every right to amend each and every part of the Indian constitution.
    A bunch of unelected judges neither have the right to self appoint themselves in the supreme court, nor they have any right to infringe on the sovereign right of Indian people to amend their constitution as they want, for the welfare of its society.

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Annddhbaakkt Spotted ..no DNA test required ... Mffff dumb faak

    • @raw8155
      @raw8155 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What if these sovereign people you speak of, mob lynch their sovereign constitution, the same way they mob lynched their very own people ? There needs to be an authority, sovereign authority, free from the influences of the ill-read people we have elected, to judge upon their wrong doings. Who'd you have as the captain of your ship ? Someone who's well versed with seafaring or a roadside lunatic ?

    • @existential_bengali
      @existential_bengali 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@raw8155Better you should live somewhere else with dictatorship of your knowledgeable idiots.

  • @mahabaleshwarpandit2378
    @mahabaleshwarpandit2378 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    it is not correct to say that basic structure of the constitution is sacrosanct because everything changes with time to keep pace with the felt needs of time. For instance socialism was brought in the preamble to the constitution. Self appointed judges and some advocates try to sermonize and to bring everything what they want into this arena. It is ridiculous judges want to be the last word on all matters including the appointment of judges and interpretation of the constitution on any matter they desire..

    • @hiheloByby6902
      @hiheloByby6902 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You go cry in your Chaiwalas House

    • @sdmhussain5435
      @sdmhussain5435 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fali Nariman has already scrutinized the collegium system of appointing judges at the same time disapproved of the NJAC as proposed by the BJP Government which would deeply effect the independence of the judiciary. But as far as amendment of the basic structure of the Constitution goes, can you describe what needs to be changed now as compared to 30-40 years ago to make the basic structure more feasible at present?

    • @mahabaleshwarpandit5117
      @mahabaleshwarpandit5117 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sdmhussain5435 Fali is no doubt a respected jurist but Parliament reflects will of the people. Secondly judiciary shouldn't be the last arbiter on issues involving conflict of interest.

    • @sdmhussain5435
      @sdmhussain5435 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mahabaleshwarpandit5117 Parliament, although is elected by the people, yet still, the laws they frame or pass will be subject to Judicial Review which is embedded under Article 13 which cannot be bypassed. Otherwise the Parliament or the State Legislative Assemblies will pass any law they want, which is why Judicial Review is important in a democracy to prevent abuse and misuse of power. There cannot be a democracy without Judicial review.

  • @danielscaria8456
    @danielscaria8456 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We lost our Saviour

  • @prathameshgaonkar7234
    @prathameshgaonkar7234 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the constitution supreme? Because you say so?

  • @hiheloByby6902
    @hiheloByby6902 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing Andhhbakts Don't realise is that , if basic sturcture and Judicial Power did not exists as of today.... They may be meeting Another Emergency like situation , once Their chai walas and chowkidars run out of power ... Vice versa ...

  • @danielscaria8456
    @danielscaria8456 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We lost our Saviour