If OSU ran the ball and kicked a FG, people would be saying "can Lanning win the big game?" It is an overreaction, same as those saying Day is a bad coach.
@@ThreadAndCircuses1Ryan Day is 1-7 as a head coach against top 5 teams, I think Columbus should be thinking about his job security If the refs gave us a review on that first drive for what was an obvious interception it would have been a totally different ballgame
I like Pat Fordes take on Oregons journey. Most people don’t seem to understand that this has been a 30 year journey to get to this point. Most people don’t seem to fully realize all of what he said. I tried explaining it to my wife but my wife doesn’t really care so….. lol. Crazy thing is if Burch comes back before the end of the season then it’s a tougher team. I believe Burch is a huge difference maker. Oregon will be tougher if he’s there. Good show thanks!!!
If you're going to talk about the officiating, you have to start with that absolutely ridiculous lack of a review on the interception, on Ohio State's opening drive. There must be repercussions for that, for that officiating crew.
The "kick it directly at someone on the front line" onside kick was the final move they used in The Waterboy, and I've been baffled it never was really used during onside kicks in real games.
ESPN last week when Oregon & Ohio State moved ahead of SEC "powerhouses" - "But what is their best win? Texas blah blah blah". This week, "Texas is clear #1."
They were expecting Ohio State to win so they could move them to 1. But then Oregon won, and their brains can't possibly process the concept of Oregon ever being the number 1 team in the country thanks to their east-coast bias. Fun fact: Oregon has never once been ranked number 1 in the country. Even in 2010 when they were 12-0, Auburn jumped them. I bet if Texas loses to Georgia next week, they'd find some excuse to keep Oregon out of the top spot.
I had a friend up in the South Hills, miles and miles away and up in the trees who could hear the stadium from her balcony! It was loud and it mattered here in the EUG.
These guys clearly don’t get it. Expansion guarantees only one thing: more exciting regular season games that ultimately have no stakes because of rematches and playoff seeding. Oregon and Ohio State can each lose 2 games this season and still make the playoff.
You go to various comments sections & some people say "we dont want our college football to turn into the NFL." I can think of fates far worse than emulating the highest earning league on the planet. The NFL is what it is today because those men know what they're doing. As far as FBS in the long term, i think the 14 team playoff model with home games into the semi finals is the way to go. The top 2 teams at the end of regular season shall receive home field advantage throughout the playoffs. The FBS CFP shall consist of 2 conferences SEC can claim schools in the south east states while the B10 claims schools towards the north west states. 4 divisions per conference, each division shall consist of 5-8 teams, giving each conference anywhere from 20 to 32 teams. Unfortunately all the FBS teams left out of the 2 CFP conferences shall be placed the CFB(College Football Bowl) conferences where CFB conference champs shall meet at the Bowl sites, just like the old system for post season play. A lot of details to work out, a lot of people with self interesrs to manage. We'll.see.what the future has in store 😁
The game DID matter. OSU must be PERFECT the rest of the way in the Big 10 or it won’t make the Big 10 Championship game AND the Playoffs. A 2-loss OSU won’t go to the playoffs over any 1-loss Big 10 or SEC teams, or over 2-loss Big 10 or SEC teams which make their championship games.
From 2009-2013, Sark's Washington Huskies went 0-5 against Oregon. From 2014-2015, Sark's USC Trojans went 0-1 against Oregon. He's got a great team at Texas these days, but I don't think Oregon or Lanning are intimidated. (The white pants are impressive, though.)
Not sure if you actually watch football, but they just played Oregon. Don’t even talk about Vandy. They barely beat Kentucky. Texas is all the SEC has.
This is no overreaction. It’s about time the national media gives us our flowers
Sco Ducks
If OSU ran the ball and kicked a FG, people would be saying "can Lanning win the big game?" It is an overreaction, same as those saying Day is a bad coach.
@@ThreadAndCircuses1Ryan Day is 1-7 as a head coach against top 5 teams, I think Columbus should be thinking about his job security
If the refs gave us a review on that first drive for what was an obvious interception it would have been a totally different ballgame
I like Pat Fordes take on Oregons journey. Most people don’t seem to understand that this has been a 30 year journey to get to this point. Most people don’t seem to fully realize all of what he said. I tried explaining it to my wife but my wife doesn’t really care so….. lol. Crazy thing is if Burch comes back before the end of the season then it’s a tougher team. I believe Burch is a huge difference maker. Oregon will be tougher if he’s there. Good show thanks!!!
If you're going to talk about the officiating, you have to start with that absolutely ridiculous lack of a review on the interception, on Ohio State's opening drive. There must be repercussions for that, for that officiating crew.
Seems like everybody forgot about that but speak highly on that pass interference call it’s a joke 🤣🤣🤣
can it, losing whiner. when will osu - top to bottom - stop crying about losing?? y'all always have excuses for not winning!
Dan immediately went recruiting. How many guys at that game said I am a duck. 😂
The "kick it directly at someone on the front line" onside kick was the final move they used in The Waterboy, and I've been baffled it never was really used during onside kicks in real games.
ESPN last week when Oregon & Ohio State moved ahead of SEC "powerhouses" - "But what is their best win? Texas blah blah blah". This week, "Texas is clear #1."
They were expecting Ohio State to win so they could move them to 1. But then Oregon won, and their brains can't possibly process the concept of Oregon ever being the number 1 team in the country thanks to their east-coast bias.
Fun fact: Oregon has never once been ranked number 1 in the country. Even in 2010 when they were 12-0, Auburn jumped them. I bet if Texas loses to Georgia next week, they'd find some excuse to keep Oregon out of the top spot.
I had a friend up in the South Hills, miles and miles away and up in the trees who could hear the stadium from her balcony! It was loud and it mattered here in the EUG.
Listened on the radio. I have no fingernails 😂 Go Ducks 🦆
These guys clearly don’t get it. Expansion guarantees only one thing: more exciting regular season games that ultimately have no stakes because of rematches and playoff seeding. Oregon and Ohio State can each lose 2 games this season and still make the playoff.
Exactly better matchups if you lose and you’re ranked high it’s ok if it’s close especially on the road. Playing better team is awesome.
Supposedly, Lanning was on the short list for OU if they couldn't get Venables, wonder where OU would be right now if they would've gone with Lanning?
Idaho played better defensively against Oregon than Overated Ohio State did.
You go to various comments sections & some people say "we dont want our college football to turn into the NFL."
I can think of fates far worse than emulating the highest earning league on the planet.
The NFL is what it is today because those men know what they're doing.
As far as FBS in the long term, i think the 14 team playoff model with home games into the semi finals is the way to go.
The top 2 teams at the end of regular season shall receive home field advantage throughout the playoffs.
The FBS CFP shall consist of 2 conferences SEC can claim schools in the south east states while the B10 claims schools towards the north west states.
4 divisions per conference, each division shall consist of 5-8 teams, giving each conference anywhere from 20 to 32 teams.
Unfortunately all the FBS teams left out of the 2 CFP conferences shall be placed the CFB(College Football Bowl) conferences where CFB conference champs shall meet at the Bowl sites, just like the old system for post season play.
A lot of details to work out, a lot of people with self interesrs to manage.
We'll.see.what the future has in store 😁
Day 0-2 vs Ducks. Gotta get over the Michigan and Oregon hump before this team can call themselves elite.
The game DID matter. OSU must be PERFECT the rest of the way in the Big 10 or it won’t make the Big 10 Championship game AND the Playoffs. A 2-loss OSU won’t go to the playoffs over any 1-loss Big 10 or SEC teams, or over 2-loss Big 10 or SEC teams which make their championship games.
Phil Knight’s wallet is the superstar
Burch should be back soon.
Bro a PSU hater
when will osu - top to bottom - stop crying about losing?? y'all always have excuses for not winning and are the funnest to watch cry! entitled.
Sark owns Lanning.
Oregon owns Sark. Look it up.
We called him 7 win Sark. Oregon beat his UW team every time.
Lol, Cowboys never own the Pacific Northwest.
From 2009-2013, Sark's Washington Huskies went 0-5 against Oregon.
From 2014-2015, Sark's USC Trojans went 0-1 against Oregon.
He's got a great team at Texas these days, but I don't think Oregon or Lanning are intimidated. (The white pants are impressive, though.)
The real superstar is the NIL that can push the Ducks over the edge of irrelevance.
oregon was relevant well before nil
Ohio State still hasn't played anybody. Vanderbilt with Diego Pavia would beat Oregon.
that is very true, oregon is a somebody, that's why ohio has a
1 in lose bracket
Derp
Not sure if you actually watch football, but they just played Oregon. Don’t even talk about Vandy. They barely beat Kentucky. Texas is all the SEC has.
@@cacogenicist did you drink the water in eugene also ???
the spitting wide out did.