@@alyw.7491 It's not the company it's the AD's. They are all in on the problem. I go into Mayors and they have all the watches I want but only for display. Now they're used watches are ready for sale and marked up 30%.
Just bought this yesterday as my first Rolex.. I had the black bay pro and felt I needed a larger dial/slimmer case.. absolutely in love with it.. what a legendary timepiece! 🚀
What size is your wrist? I have 6.5 relatively flat wrists, and the Black Bay Pro fits like a glove. I'm worried that the lug to lug length on the Explorer II is too much.
@@BrittPearceWatches thank you so much. It feels weirdly like a natural thing because of owning the Tudor black bay, but it’s still exciting for sure! Glad you appreciate the black dial.. like the GMT hand, it’s historically correct.. but it just looks cooler too! Thanks again
I'm not sure the EX II is under-rated or over-rated. I think it's appropriately rated. The fact that it trades on or just under retail, I mean who cares 😅 just a sign of the current climate. And....the black dial variant for me all day long. Helps to make the watch appear slightly smaller than it is I think.
The new ones (42mm) trade a grand plus above the RRP, so funnily enough, the odd model out is doing better (and closer to say, Submariners) than the original, smaller ones which should fit more people...
Where is it trading on or under retail? If you mean what a dealer will pay a flipper who was offered one by their AD and wants rid ASAP, then yes, they pay retail. If you mean how much the dealer sells it on for, then no, there is a premium (more fir polar dial). Not as high a premium as for e.g. Sub or GMT. The Explorer 2 is underrated or the Sub is overrated, take your pick.
If we're talking about the black dial, then I 'd say the discontinued 216570 is more special. The "phantom" hands found in the 216570 is a neat throwback to the very first Explorer II, the ref 1655.
I got one of the very last 2021 production year, ref 216570 models, just before it was discontinued. Exactly 50 years after the 1655 Freccione was first introduced. Ref 216570 still has the iconic shadow hands and also a matte black dial, just like the original 1655. The latest model now sports a much dressier glossy black dial and it also lost its iconic shadow hands. So one could say that the now discontinued ref 216570 is the closest version to the original Steve McQueen (ref 1655).
What makes her think it is unpopular. I don't think she knows what she is talking about. Must be a millennial. It is the only model I like from Rolex and sold many of them in the past. This was years ago. I actually hate Rolex as a company now and would never own one these days.
Still have my first Rolex, Explorer II 16570 black, a gift from my future wife in '97. Gave her an Explorer I 36 which she adores up to now. Been married 25 years. Love the watch and the memories.
The 40mm Explorer 2s were perfect 👌 same thing with the pre ceramic Rolex Submariners/GMTs and Sea dwellers. The wearability was perfect and own a Explorer 1 and a Submariner but Anything after the pre ceramics? Rolex can keep. Rolex lost sight of what they used to be all about.Even the older 48h Rolex movement's were indestructible compared to the new Rolex movement's that seem to need services alot more frequently. Every watchmaker I spoke with say the exact same thing. Even the rotors were dead silent on the older Rolex movement's. Now they are too noisy
Maybe like me, your husband is putting on weight? 😏 so his wrist is getting thicker? Mind you I don’t actually know if packing on the pounds effects wrist size so much. As for the Explorer II, I’ve never really warmed up to it either. Even if, like you I do prefer the older sub-40mm ‘vintage’ versions. I prefer the ‘Neo-vintage’ moniker myself though, makes feel less old 👨🏻🦳 Oh and I remain skeptical that Rolex actually developed this watch specifically for cavers. That’s an incredibly niche market! All those original R&D costs involved for some caver dudes? Seems odd. And yes, it looks like a hockey puck on your petit wrist, suits your Bo better 🙂
Just picked one up in Las Vegas. White Dial. Stopped in the Rolex boutique in Caesars. With no purchase history. Super nice saleswoman said she would put me on list. On a lark, I said yes. She texted me 3 hours later and said a customer reneged on picking one up and if I wanted it to stip back in. I'm so happy to say I went back, picked it right up, and I'm loving it. 😊
I was offered one and turned it down. Tried it on at the AD and was surprised at how much I disliked it. Wears like a hockey puck and doesn’t have any of the charm of the neo-vintage 16570s.
The Explorer II is my favorite Rolex. First time I saw it was when I first got into watches and I walked into my Doctors office and I saw him with it on. Loved it right away.
My first Rolex. Just got the call yesterday. I waited 10 years for this moment to actually be able to buy a Rolex, and I’m so glad it was this one. I am absolutely in love with this watch. Thank you for covering such a complex, simple, yet elegant watch that I plan to cherish for the rest of my days. It’s great to know someone reveres this watch as much as I do. Bravo and thanks again. Happy Holidays.
I chose a white dial 40mm version. Last of that line with its most improved movement. It's a more balanced dial and wears beautifully on an average wrist. Additionally, it is a white dial watch with a stainless bezel which is uncommon and matches well style wise with lots of clothing choices. We should be honest that among many other things, we enjoy watches for their aesthetics and matching them up with occasions and clothing like jewelry options. I will never ever go spelunking no matter the watch I wear, I'm afraid of caves...
I actually just picked up one of these a few weeks ago, I am in love with it so far and in my opinion it’s definitely super underrated. I also think it’s funny people say it’s under the radar on wrist when it’s a submariner dial with an extra hand I feel like you can still tell it’s a Rolex from a mile away.
Back in the time when you could still get a discount on Rolexes, I was offered 30% off an Explorer II white dial (the 42mm version, so it wasn’t that long ago) without even asking for one. I ultimately went a different direction, but I still like them. However, I really think I prefer the older 40mm Polar version because the 42mm model felt like it wore huge for 42mm, and I used to wear watches up to 48mm. I do love the romance of an Explorer II, which feels way more up to exploration than Explorer, since that’s time-only. I shopped extensively for the Polar in 40mm, looking for something with drilled lugs. I was patient-the prices were dropping and dropping; I started to see some in the sub-$4,000 range. And then, out of nowhere, these unwanted Explorer IIs became vintage relics and their prices shot up the way every other Rolex shot up. And now that I have a BB GMT, I don’t really see a place in my collection for another GMT watch (even if this wasn’t meant to be a GMT). Still, the vintage models with the Polar white dial, red GMT hand, and drilled lugs…what a beauty.
I like the white face version myself. Like you I have a blue black gmt 11 which I love. Just bought a Tudor Pelagos with blue dial - a bit different as it’s a very bright blue and although Titanium it still feels quite heavy. Enjoy your watches!
The watch is a bit boring. It would be nice if rolex made it a bit more functional with a tungsten bezel. Also new dial colours would throw the watch world into chaos. Something nice and civilized like, green, yellow and orange. And just for fun, I'd love to see Rolex make a 2-tone version, full gold and a platinum versions of the watch for those who wantrs some bling for their cave exploring.
Some time ago I handled a black dial Explorer ll with aged lume. It was one of the most stunning watches I have seen. It oozed sophistication in a way no modern Rolex is able to.
Maybe because from an aesthetic point of view, it is an UGLY watch (in the same realms as a pair of Birkenstocks!). If we are looking at luxury watches with not only good craftsmanship and breeding, but also 'pleasant on the eye', there are many, many more luxury brand watches on the market that leave this particular brand 'standing'. We already know that there is a wide divide between the poor and rich...but an even 'wider' one between the 'rich and the wealthy'. So perhaps so brands loose there 'exclusivity' due to them becoming 'over' popular and more attainable. So therefore the '1%' (that would be the wealthy rather than the former), just move onto finer less attainable brands.
IT'S NOT THOUGH. Firstly this is clearly regional. AND you are also trying to compare it to things that are over performing on the whole (the rest of the rolex professional lineup)... But overall you can't call something that actually was unpopular until about 2021 still unpopular when they move almost as fast as they come in on the secondary market and the secondary price went from 25OO or less USD to 8k floor and 12k crazy but out there in multiple places price.
The 42mm case also lays like a plank. If you have a 7” wrist or larger it’s no problem. Otherwise the lugs are floating out there like Wile E Coyote right before gravity kicks in. I like the Explorer II a lot and if I were going to buy a second Rolex, that would be it, in a black dial to further fly under the radar.
Yeah it looks perfect my just over 7 wrist. It’s good Rolex offer this size for guys with bigger wrists, the GMTs are there for those who want something smaller.
For any serious Rolex collector the Explorer 2 is an important watch to have. Same as other oddball models like the Sky Dweller, the Air King and the Millgaus. The masses go for the Submariner, the GMT Master, the Daytona and the Dayjust. We the geeks like the quirky ones.
Gaaaah! It’s sooo good! You know, I’m wearing my Daytona right now! I haven’t worn it in forever (the husband has been wearing it for the last year or so!) and I forgot how magical it is. I need the white dial now 😈😈😈
This is probably the watch I wear most frequently. I inherited it from my partner who had it sitting in a box collecting dust. Early 2000's model. It wears REALLY well. Fairly light and relatively slim for a sports watch. Good overall choice.
Excellent video Britt👌I’ve owned the 226570 black for almost a year and I absolutely love it! Prior to this watch, in terms of Rolex, I’d had the ceramic No Date Sub in both 40mm and 41mm, 2 16570’s, and a couple of 36mm Explorers, but the orange hand of the black modern II always pulled me. I’d always discounted the 216570 back in the day as I assumed it’d be too big for my 6.75 wrist, but it just isn’t, I actually think if I’d just got the 216570 over the 114060 I originally purchased then I’d still own it. The black is definitely the way to go, that orange just pops so much better. This watch works so well on straps too and especially on an orange Rubber B🍊- It’s a great watch and I have zero regrets over the purchase, 100% my fav modern Rolex reference.
I caught myself being a watch snob the other day. I was in Vanderbilt hospital and I saw a doctor with this same black dial explorer II and I thought to myself…Pfft.. lol… why??? Till I realized it was probably just the only steel sports Rolex he could purchase. On the other hand it will probably be a fantastic watch for him.
I owned and wore the ORIGINAL Explorer II, the 1655, from the late 70s through most of the 80s. When the collectors drove the price into the stratosphere, I sold it. I now own a Steinhart Ocean GMT OLKO Special Edition and LOVE it. When I look at my wrist, it's the 70s again. And with the money from the sale of the 1655, I've taken vacations to Rome and Jamaica and so forth. I just think the prices of Rolex watches have gotten stupid. The Steinharts are amazing watches.
I bought a 2021 Sub date and the explorer 2 a couple months apart. I just sold the Sub because I don’t wear it. The Explorer stands out to me. Everyone wants to look like the Sub. The Explorer has its own style. And I have 8 inch wrists. Even the 41 mm Sub looked small On me compared to the explorer that looks perfect to me. It’s my daily. Good video Britt. Don’t forget about us big wristers. We get forgot about in the the watch world on the race to make everything 38mm
Another fantastic video Britt! You ha e truly become one of those watch TH-camr I subscribe to, whose videos I look forward to and whose opinion and thoughts I think are wonderfully constructed and I value! This watch though....this watch is my grail watch. I'm not a Rolex fan, never really have been but once I saw the Explorer 2 with a polar dial out in the wild and I've wanted it ever since! I think it's one of those perfect do it all watches you can go adventuring with, or take out on date night or to church! I truly truly love it! Great video as always!
Whaaat! OK. FIRST OF ALL! Thank you soooo so much! My head isn’t going to be able to fit through the door! 🤣 I’m so glad you’re enjoying my weird little channel! 💕 I have been trying to make each video a little better than the last! Now! The Explorer 2 is a very worthwhile grail! 😍😍 the polar dial just has such a great summer time feel to it, it looks good with everything, I love the orange against the white dial! 😍 just *chef kiss*
Most folks don’t realise that it is the one model that does not come in precious metals or bi metal. Or in different dial variations. It makes this watch special that it’s the one model that Rolex won’t create a bejeweled gold sissy sports watch.
It was underrated maybe 2 years ago. Now it's hyped. The polar is very hyped. The black is slightly underrated but still in demand. I also find that the omega SMP 300M 42mm case and lug width wears better than the explorer with similar dimensions. I think it's the more turned down lyre style lugs that make it a a slightly conforming fit, I feel like the explorer 2 has more lug overhang than the SMP 300M. My grail used to be the polar exp2 but i cant afford that 9.5k price so i went with the Black bay pro and absolutely love it. I dont think i settled at all too. As we've said, todays Tudors are rolex of many years ago, being amazing quality proper tool watches!
You think?! Idk! I don’t work for Rolex! 😅 but one of my ADs said it was quite low demand! Particularly for a professional model. But maybe it’s just not popular in Bristol! 😅
I think specifically the black is probably in much lower demand, but the polar is super hot, atleast from what I've seen on social media, youtube,, and talking to ADs.
I dislike the bezel and I think that’s what part of reason it’s unpopular 🤔Rolex has many more aesthetically attractive choices like GMTs and Subs or even Sea Dwellers
I think it's safe to say that this is the last true tool watch from Rolex. They don't offer it in precious metal, there're no polished center links and it's far less blingy than many other pieces in the modern Rolex lineup. It would be awesome if they brought the Explorer 2 back in 40mm.
Why doesn't it have triplock crown? I would smash but I go swimming ever summer with my Rolley on so I need the reassurance of triplock crown. Great video
As someone with an 8.5" wrist I would absolutely love to wear a larger Explorer II. I like it's understated functionality and that it isn't flashy. I like to wear my watches daily regardless of what I'm doing and to me it looks like an Explorer II would keep up with the demands of that. It doesn't hurt that they are a bit cheaper too. I like the black dial to be honest, just love a high visibility high contrast dial.
Too big and kinda ugly. If I were to go spelunking I'd wear a G-Shock square with the lighted display. But it's the Rolex name on the dial we pay for, so if it's worth it to you, by all means rock this cave dweller beast 😊
My heart still goes out to the Polar 16570. It's a nice pre-owned piece that I have gotten off someone from a watch forum and refurbished by Rolex Service Centre. It's totally toolish and understated at the same time. I have nothing against the Black Dial variant, just that the White Dial flutters my heart much more 😊
Agree 100% I was lucky to find a 2009 BNOS 5 digit polar a few years back. It’s the perfect tool watch. Understated, functional and goes with anything.
Yes. I agree that white polar dial is way to go, given that most sports models have black dials, how boring! Why can't they come up with white dialed sub or GMT? I would love to see the black ceramic bezel on a white dial, besides the Daytona!
It does not scream MONEY. Often we see those SS well worn and scratched to hell and back. It's not an eye pleaser for sure. Back then the price was right. Now it's too basic to be a winner in this price range.
I had the explorer 2 polar dial (42mm) on my wrist and found it too large as it being a grail watch I was disappointed. Still came out with a Tudor pro though. My wrist size is 7.25 inches.
Are you going to talk about the new Tissot prx 35mm Powermatic that just got released? 😊 Maybe a hands on review? As a fellow member of the small wrist committee Id love to hear your opinion on it!
RIGHT?! I feel exactly the same!!! Who knows! Maybe for watches and wonders 2024 they’ll bring the size back down?! 😱 they’ve been doing a lot of downsizing! But I don’t think that will happen 😅 they’d have to make an entirely new movement!
yep and that's why I'm on the lookout for the older 5 digit 16570 Explorer II. Tried on the 216570 and 226570, while 42mm might not sound huge, these watches wear large on the wrist.
@@lettuce1305 had the 226570 white, they wear big interns of width though. so for 6.5" wrist its just wearable fine.great lume, weight, movement and case finishing. bracelet best in the biz also
Oh Britt, you’re bringing out the boomer in me. Hilariously happy for you, and may your marriage keep getting better. Canadians can’t sing, bring it on Murray and Adams
My favorite, first, and currently only Rolex. My favorite for several of the reasons you described. Primarily, it's the last real tool watch they make; built for a specific purpose, tool first. Most elect for the fancier, more colorful GMT II, but there's something about the simple noble elegance of the last true Rolex tool watch. Also, I DO use the day/night aspect of it. I do landscape photography as a serious hobby. Occasionally, I go to Iceland or other Arctic Circle regions at times of the year when the sun is fully above or below the horizon for the full 24 hours. Obviously the sky gives me a clue as to daytime/nighttime, but it's still nice to use it for its intended purpose!
As much as I hate Rolex the only one I would ever own would be an older, when they were still cool and a little smaller, Explorer ll white dial. On a strap of course. No bracelet. I am not a woman.
I really wanted something i do not see everyday. Submariners are amazing and iconic but are everywhere. I very rarely see the exp 2. I love the exp 2 and specifically asked for the black dial. Just a preference over the white and i think that is what makes this hobby so great. Everyone can wear what speaks to them. The exp 2 gets a lot of compliments and sparks conversation with other watch peeps. It always starts with how rarely if ever people see the watch.
This watch is probably so undesirable because Rolex completely cocked up the dial redesign from the original 1655. Yes, the 1655 Explorer II was originally intended for cave-diving, and the original dial had 24 markers (for a separate 24-hour hand). There were NO jumping hands, so a user would adjust the regular hour hand and 24-hour hand concurrently. Thus, the 1655 was NOT designed to be a GMT watch and couldn't be used as a GMT watch (unless you were cave diving in the UK)! Although that original dial looks very bizarre, it is actually very straightforward and useful when looking at it at night. However, Rolex probably should have simply put an AM/PM indicator on the original model instead of a 24 hour indicator. By redesigning the dial to have only 12 rounded markers, Rolex completely destroyed the link between form and function of the original 1655. In my opinion, this current Explorer II should be permanently discontinued for redundancy (i.e. Rolex already has the GMT Master II with the jumping hour hand and GMT hand).
Honestly, I never knew (or even thought about the use of) about the day and night use of the 24 hour hand. I've never needed to keep track of a second time zone which has made me steer away from GMT watches. Now I actually have a use of that extra hand. Thanks Britt ❤️💜
@@BrittPearceWatches Absolutely, very well put. It would however be more compelling in the 40mm case with the latest movement and the latest GMT hand (can’t do this without a gripe or two, sorry 😂)
I love my Explorer ll white dial even with a 6" wrist. Very comfortable and I certainly don't think it's bulky at all. I certainly like the satin look on the bracelet as it hides any marks. I only waited 3 month's for mine which I was quite surprised with.
The Explorer and Explorer 2 in all of the variants will forever epitomized Rolex in my mind. They are the ultimate tool watches, not quite minimalistic but close. They perform the job without much bling. Great video, Britt.
Completely agree with the sizing being a primary reason the Exp. 2 is “underrated.” In a vaccum, the Explorer 2 is great. But for most people, the GMT line wears much better. The subs wear better, too. That’s subjective, but I think the objective sales data bears that out.
I completely agree, if the Exp II comes in 40mm it would be a huge seller, however that may take away some of the sales for the GMT even though they're still different.
Love the content Britt. For someone who might already own an Explorer (I), instead of going for an Explorer II, they might try the Grand Seiko SBGN005. GS took a lot of the Explorer II design, finished it well and powered it with a high accuracy quartz. A fraction of the Explorer II price and helps add a little something different to ones collection. But of course, it’s not a Rolex :-). Cheers.
@@BrittPearceWatches The (pricier) GS SBGE283 or 285 are an excellent spring drive alternative. Was tempted to go for the black (283) as a stopgap until my Exp 2 arrives, but went with the BB Pro. If only GS had put the power reserve on the back.
I'm 'on the list' for one at my AD. I think the main reason is definitely the size. If they'd gone back to 40mm at the last update there'd be a lot more demand. Last time I tried one on I was wearing my Speedy Pro, and this was noticeably larger due to the increased lug-to-lug. The relatively small thickness helps a lot though. Black over the polar dial, as it's less like a saucer on your wrist.
RIGHT?! I completely agree on the 40mm!! I like the fantasise for watches and wonders 2024, they will bring it back down to 40mm 🙈 but I don’t think it’ll happen!
@@emc14000I do like the 16570, and would definitely go with the polar with this model. However, a 2010/11 (with the text on the rehaut) is the one I’d want, and they’re expensive. Plus I prefer the orange GMT hand.
@@BrittPearceWatches Rolex, if you’re reading (of course they are), Explorer in 36 & 40 is done, so how about offering the Exp 2 in 39 and 42? Pretty please.
I went to my AD a few years ago to see a 2000 Sub/Date, and tried on a 2000 Explorer2/Black (16570). It just melted onto my 6-5/8” wrist. I liked the fact that you didn’t see this one too often in the wild and it had a more slender profile, lighter feel, small crown, gmt hand, and the steel bezel gave it a tool, yet elegant look. I left the AD with the Explorer2.
Doesn’t the 6-18 month wait list kinda refute the premise of the video? I guess it’s all relative, but I imagine that every other brand would kill to have an underperforming model with wait list.
@@luismartinez3016 i tried the black bay pro. Despite what everyones saying, the height kills the watch. Its the case where as soon as tudor produces a slimmer gmt movement, the black bay pro would fly out of my watch box because id ditch it for the "black bay pro mk II" I guess within the next 2 or 3 years, tudor will be able to produce such a movement.
@@seanp7871 yeah you know, nobody ever could tell me why its logical that a so called "sports watch" is heavy and bulky as they sometimes are nowadays. Maybe you need compensation for a small wiener though.
If you think the 1991 vintage hurts, try that being the year of high school graduation. 😩 On an Explorer II note, the 226570 being the 50h anniversary model means it comes from the same era I do, which was one small reason I went with one for my big birthday. It is my celebration only Rolex. Yes, I went with the bog model, though it seems dwarfed by the current Sea Dweller on my 7.25” wrist. I loved the SD, but just don’t think I would find it comfortable as a daily with that heft. Sized for my wrist, my Explorer II is 152 grams, which isn’t terrible. I have a 39.5mm Seiko Alpinist on Strapcode bracelet that is 140g. It definitely doesn’t disappear on the wrist, but I don’t need it to. I own other watches for that. The size definitely isn’t for everyone, but I think it would be silly if almost all Rolexes were around some “ideal” size for everyone. I love that my Rolex is not common and is the last full tool watch Rolex. I see Submariners very frequently, but I have only seen one other Explorer II out in public in over 4 years, which would have been a 216570. I do like the polar dial, but felt the black dial was more versatile and better as my only Rolex. I would own both if I could. I don’t know if the Explorer II is quite as unknown as they must have been back in the 1655 days. Look at how much those go for now! Not even in the attainable range for me, and I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable with a vintage watch worth so much on my wrist. One AD I spoke with said they sold maybe 5 in the previous year, and this is in a very large metro area. Definitely not a high volume watch. My AD expected mine to take at least a year to get, but it showed up in 5 months. My AD rep still tells me how cool he thinks it is that I got that over what everyone else gets. Another rep on site when I picked up mine had a black 16570 on and let me try it on and compare the two. I get why people like that size, and the owner wasn’t a big guy. He’s owned it for 22 years and said although it had never been serviced, it still kept great time. That kind of testament is one reason people are willing to pay for these watches. Anyway, thanks for listening to me ramble about this great watch, and thanks for giving it some rare attention in one of your down to earth videos.
No apologies ever needed for Rolex content, Britt :) I'd like a polar dial 16570, but the current model wears very large (larger than its stated dimensions) and does not interest me. Cheers!
I'm also on the hunt for a 16570 Polar, I have tried both the 216570 and 226570 white and black dials, they somehow wear larger than other 42mm watches I've tried.
This model looks really weird compared to the other sports models from Rolex. The 24 h mechanism of the second hour hand is also something that hardly no one ever will utilise. So all in all it is a solid watch but will never be as popular as a sub or a gmt. 😊
The flow, transitions, and overall production value were exceptional for this video. Not sure you did anything different, but this one just hit on all cylinders. Love the story of your attachment to the watch! Great way you, specifically, differentiate as a content creator. On the actual watch, this is IMO perhaps the best Rolex sports model. The black dial, the orange hand, the iconic markers & hands, and a cyclops! Definitely for me this watch far above the more ubiquitous 3/6/9 traditional Explorer.
Now this comment has completely made my day! 1. SALTY IS IN THE HOUSE!!! 💕👏🏻 2. Thank you sooo so much! I really have been trying to work on my video flow and pacing! I’ve been experimenting with how long I leave different B-rolls up!! And how things transition! I am soo glad it is showing! 💕 I’m still a work in progress. 🙈 but trying to get better with every video! And 3. The Explorer 2 is such a unique watch in the Rolex catalogue isn’t it?! Tool watch goodness. Great functionality! It is just *chef kiss*
I hope I don’t offend anyone but I just don’t like the explorer… 😬 Last week I bought my first Rolex from an AD. I got the Submariner two tone and that is much more my style. But…. I can absolutely understand that the explorer is THE Rolex for someone else. Buy and wear what you like 🤩
It's so unpopular I still can't buy one from my AD after 6 months of waiting.
I feel this lol
going on 4 years, the scam continues.
Have you tried giving your wife to the AD?
Exactly. It's all a scam! Why do you want to buy a watch from a company that's jerking you around like that!
@@alyw.7491 It's not the company it's the AD's. They are all in on the problem. I go into Mayors and they have all the watches I want but only for display. Now they're used watches are ready for sale and marked up 30%.
Just bought this yesterday as my first Rolex.. I had the black bay pro and felt I needed a larger dial/slimmer case.. absolutely in love with it.. what a legendary timepiece! 🚀
WHAAAT NOOO WAY!! Biggest congrats EVER!!! Freaking AWESOME choice!!! 💕💕🎉🎉🎉 wear it in good health and make lots of memories with it! 💕👏🏻
Congratulations on your new watch! You just can't go wrong with the Explorer II.
nice! i love the explorer 2 in the polar white dial
What size is your wrist? I have 6.5 relatively flat wrists, and the Black Bay Pro fits like a glove. I'm worried that the lug to lug length on the Explorer II is too much.
@@BrittPearceWatches thank you so much. It feels weirdly like a natural thing because of owning the Tudor black bay, but it’s still exciting for sure! Glad you appreciate the black dial.. like the GMT hand, it’s historically correct.. but it just looks cooler too! Thanks again
I'm not sure the EX II is under-rated or over-rated. I think it's appropriately rated. The fact that it trades on or just under retail, I mean who cares 😅 just a sign of the current climate. And....the black dial variant for me all day long. Helps to make the watch appear slightly smaller than it is I think.
You know! I really can’t disagree with any of this! 💕👏🏻
The new ones (42mm) trade a grand plus above the RRP, so funnily enough, the odd model out is doing better (and closer to say, Submariners) than the original, smaller ones which should fit more people...
Where is it trading on or under retail? If you mean what a dealer will pay a flipper who was offered one by their AD and wants rid ASAP, then yes, they pay retail. If you mean how much the dealer sells it on for, then no, there is a premium (more fir polar dial). Not as high a premium as for e.g. Sub or GMT. The Explorer 2 is underrated or the Sub is overrated, take your pick.
@@BrittPearceWatches White dial... *chef kiss* it's quirky and not the typical Wolex.
@@WxAxNxDxExRxExR I've seen and have been offered the EX II black dial about £200 below retail. The white dial just over retail, but not by much
I love this watch. The GMT function is really useful. Also the 226570 is the 50th Anniversary, which makes it more special. If you know, you know.
If we're talking about the black dial, then I 'd say the discontinued 216570 is more special. The "phantom" hands found in the 216570 is a neat throwback to the very first Explorer II, the ref 1655.
@@lettuce1305I agree, plus the 216570 has a movement that is unique to the Explorer 2. I think in time it will be highly collectible.
I got one of the very last 2021 production year, ref 216570 models, just before it was discontinued. Exactly 50 years after the 1655 Freccione was first introduced. Ref 216570 still has the iconic shadow hands and also a matte black dial, just like the original 1655. The latest model now sports a much dressier glossy black dial and it also lost its iconic shadow hands. So one could say that the now discontinued ref 216570 is the closest version to the original Steve McQueen (ref 1655).
I love mine almost as much as Adrian Barker loves his 😂
🤣🤣 THATS A LOT OF LOVE!
Impossible
Me too .. Even got his strap on as I write this 😂 By the way: The strap is ridiculously good!!
😂😂😂
What makes her think it is unpopular. I don't think she knows what she is talking about. Must be a millennial. It is the only model I like from Rolex and sold many of them in the past. This was years ago. I actually hate Rolex as a company now and would never own one these days.
Still have my first Rolex, Explorer II 16570 black, a gift from my future wife in '97. Gave her an Explorer I 36 which she adores up to now. Been married 25 years. Love the watch and the memories.
i like unpopular rolex, cause then they are cheap and lower demand :D
I love my vintage Explorer 2 because of how storied it is. From my navy captain uncle to my manager father to doctor me 😊
Oh I love this!!! 💕💕💕 watches are so much more than things to tell the time! I love this!
Watch geeks don't like rolex Britney :p
Swapped in my submariner for a explorer 2. I have no regrets. Having the second time zone and a model that isn’t common are two huge pluses.
Wow brave move, bravo, and one I would love to do.
I just got the call for the white dial, should i or shouldn't i 😉
The 40mm Explorer 2s were perfect 👌 same thing with the pre ceramic Rolex Submariners/GMTs and Sea dwellers. The wearability was perfect and own a Explorer 1 and a Submariner but Anything after the pre ceramics? Rolex can keep. Rolex lost sight of what they used to be all about.Even the older 48h Rolex movement's were indestructible compared to the new Rolex movement's that seem to need services alot more frequently. Every watchmaker I spoke with say the exact same thing. Even the rotors were dead silent on the older Rolex movement's. Now they are too noisy
Maybe like me, your husband is putting on weight? 😏 so his wrist is getting thicker? Mind you I don’t actually know if packing on the pounds effects wrist size so much.
As for the Explorer II, I’ve never really warmed up to it either. Even if, like you I do prefer the older sub-40mm ‘vintage’ versions. I prefer the ‘Neo-vintage’ moniker myself though, makes feel less old 👨🏻🦳
Oh and I remain skeptical that Rolex actually developed this watch specifically for cavers. That’s an incredibly niche market! All those original R&D costs involved for some caver dudes? Seems odd. And yes, it looks like a hockey puck on your petit wrist, suits your Bo better 🙂
It will be perfect at 40mm.
RIGHT?! I do agree! You’ll have to look into the neo vintage offerings!
Cuz it looks ugly, looks cheap and with low quality
Just picked one up in Las Vegas. White Dial. Stopped in the Rolex boutique in Caesars. With no purchase history. Super nice saleswoman said she would put me on list. On a lark, I said yes. She texted me 3 hours later and said a customer reneged on picking one up and if I wanted it to stip back in. I'm so happy to say I went back, picked it right up, and I'm loving it. 😊
Congratulations!!! 🙌🏽🙌🏽
Wow you were allowed to spend money with them- What a privilege
she lied, there was no other customer
@@hittingreens5646 Maybe, maybe not. I got what I wanted so I am happy. Its an awesome GADA.
Trust me. You were played!
I was offered one and turned it down. Tried it on at the AD and was surprised at how much I disliked it. Wears like a hockey puck and doesn’t have any of the charm of the neo-vintage 16570s.
The Explorer II is my favorite Rolex. First time I saw it was when I first got into watches and I walked into my Doctors office and I saw him with it on. Loved it right away.
Perhaps your doctor is the person who posted the above comment? Wouldn’t that be cool?
Ahhh I absolutely love this!
Since I got my sub no date 124060 my explorer II black dial has gotten less wrist time….. both struggle to have a place in my collection.
My first Rolex. Just got the call yesterday. I waited 10 years for this moment to actually be able to buy a Rolex, and I’m so glad it was this one. I am absolutely in love with this watch. Thank you for covering such a complex, simple, yet elegant watch that I plan to cherish for the rest of my days. It’s great to know someone reveres this watch as much as I do.
Bravo and thanks again. Happy Holidays.
Same here bro, you from crypto? :D
10 years on a wait list???
@@BlockChainzz he said 10 years from this moment haha, the Explorer II is not that crazy like a Daytona or GMT Pepsi
10 years??? Omg. You really have a ton of patience.
the polar version is a watch on my radar for a special birthday that and my sub I'd be happy for life
I chose a white dial 40mm version. Last of that line with its most improved movement. It's a more balanced dial and wears beautifully on an average wrist. Additionally, it is
a white dial watch with a stainless bezel which is uncommon and matches well style wise with lots of clothing choices. We should be honest that among many other things, we enjoy watches for their aesthetics and matching them up with occasions and clothing like jewelry options. I will never ever go spelunking no matter the watch I wear, I'm afraid of caves...
I’d definitely have a black face in my collection and wear it with pride.
I actually just picked up one of these a few weeks ago, I am in love with it so far and in my opinion it’s definitely super underrated. I also think it’s funny people say it’s under the radar on wrist when it’s a submariner dial with an extra hand I feel like you can still tell it’s a Rolex from a mile away.
This was my first Rolex, funny I send an email to my AD asking for a polar, two weeks later got the call
Love the look, prefer if they could keep them at 39-40mm and 11mm thick. Too much to ask perhaps
I couldn’t agree more! 👏🏻👏🏻 this is exactly how I feel! Who knows?! Maybe they’ll bring this back down to 40mm @ Watches and Wonders 2024?!
I would feel weird if I ain't hear you mention Rolex at least once in your video, like Harrison forgot to say "as always"
Back in the time when you could still get a discount on Rolexes, I was offered 30% off an Explorer II white dial (the 42mm version, so it wasn’t that long ago) without even asking for one. I ultimately went a different direction, but I still like them. However, I really think I prefer the older 40mm Polar version because the 42mm model felt like it wore huge for 42mm, and I used to wear watches up to 48mm. I do love the romance of an Explorer II, which feels way more up to exploration than Explorer, since that’s time-only. I shopped extensively for the Polar in 40mm, looking for something with drilled lugs. I was patient-the prices were dropping and dropping; I started to see some in the sub-$4,000 range. And then, out of nowhere, these unwanted Explorer IIs became vintage relics and their prices shot up the way every other Rolex shot up. And now that I have a BB GMT, I don’t really see a place in my collection for another GMT watch (even if this wasn’t meant to be a GMT). Still, the vintage models with the Polar white dial, red GMT hand, and drilled lugs…what a beauty.
I like the white face version myself. Like you I have a blue black gmt 11 which I love. Just bought a Tudor Pelagos with blue dial - a bit different as it’s a very bright blue and although Titanium it still feels quite heavy. Enjoy your watches!
The watch is a bit boring. It would be nice if rolex made it a bit more functional with a tungsten bezel. Also new dial colours would throw the watch world into chaos. Something nice and civilized like, green, yellow and orange.
And just for fun, I'd love to see Rolex make a 2-tone version, full gold and a platinum versions of the watch for those who wantrs some bling for their cave exploring.
Some time ago I handled a black dial Explorer ll with aged lume. It was one of the most stunning watches I have seen. It oozed sophistication in a way no modern Rolex is able to.
Maybe because from an aesthetic point of view, it is an UGLY watch (in the same realms as a pair of Birkenstocks!). If we are looking at luxury watches with not only good craftsmanship and breeding, but also 'pleasant on the eye', there are many, many more luxury brand watches on the market that leave this particular brand 'standing'.
We already know that there is a wide divide between the poor and rich...but an even 'wider' one between the 'rich and the wealthy'. So perhaps so brands loose there 'exclusivity' due to them becoming 'over' popular and more attainable. So therefore the '1%' (that would be the wealthy rather than the former), just move onto finer less attainable brands.
“Cosplay as sporty people” is the most accurate description I’ve ever heard. 😂 great content!
IT'S NOT THOUGH. Firstly this is clearly regional. AND you are also trying to compare it to things that are over performing on the whole (the rest of the rolex professional lineup)... But overall you can't call something that actually was unpopular until about 2021 still unpopular when they move almost as fast as they come in on the secondary market and the secondary price went from 25OO or less USD to 8k floor and 12k crazy but out there in multiple places price.
The 42mm case also lays like a plank. If you have a 7” wrist or larger it’s no problem. Otherwise the lugs are floating out there like Wile E Coyote right before gravity kicks in. I like the Explorer II a lot and if I were going to buy a second Rolex, that would be it, in a black dial to further fly under the radar.
Yeah it looks perfect my just over 7 wrist. It’s good Rolex offer this size for guys with bigger wrists, the GMTs are there for those who want something smaller.
Get the old 40mm, i love mine (black) so much, that I’m consideri g a second 16750 polar dial.
For any serious Rolex collector the Explorer 2 is an important watch to have. Same as other oddball models like the Sky Dweller, the Air King and the Millgaus. The masses go for the Submariner, the GMT Master, the Daytona and the Dayjust. We the geeks like the quirky ones.
Too big. 😆
Too big for me too! 😅
I love the black dial explorer II, it's the Rolex I'm going to buy when I buy a Rolex
I love the Explorer II especially with the white dial and it is my favorite Rolex after the obvious choice of the Daytona.
Gaaaah! It’s sooo good! You know, I’m wearing my Daytona right now! I haven’t worn it in forever (the husband has been wearing it for the last year or so!) and I forgot how magical it is. I need the white dial now 😈😈😈
I will never buy the Explorer2, because I have the Christopher Ward in black and I love it!
This is probably the watch I wear most frequently. I inherited it from my partner who had it sitting in a box collecting dust. Early 2000's model. It wears REALLY well. Fairly light and relatively slim for a sports watch. Good overall choice.
BRB, cosplaying as a spelunker 😂
Excellent video Britt👌I’ve owned the 226570 black for almost a year and I absolutely love it! Prior to this watch, in terms of Rolex, I’d had the ceramic No Date Sub in both 40mm and 41mm, 2 16570’s, and a couple of 36mm Explorers, but the orange hand of the black modern II always pulled me. I’d always discounted the 216570 back in the day as I assumed it’d be too big for my 6.75 wrist, but it just isn’t, I actually think if I’d just got the 216570 over the 114060 I originally purchased then I’d still own it. The black is definitely the way to go, that orange just pops so much better. This watch works so well on straps too and especially on an orange Rubber B🍊- It’s a great watch and I have zero regrets over the purchase, 100% my fav modern Rolex reference.
I caught myself being a watch snob the other day. I was in Vanderbilt hospital and I saw a doctor with this same black dial explorer II and I thought to myself…Pfft.. lol… why??? Till I realized it was probably just the only steel sports Rolex he could purchase. On the other hand it will probably be a fantastic watch for him.
He could get a submariner. 😀
Grand Seiko SBGN003 & SBGN005 GMT is a much better watch and package, Size, Accuracy, Finishing, Price, Build quality.
I owned and wore the ORIGINAL Explorer II, the 1655, from the late 70s through most of the 80s. When the collectors drove the price into the stratosphere, I sold it. I now own a Steinhart Ocean GMT OLKO Special Edition and LOVE it. When I look at my wrist, it's the 70s again. And with the money from the sale of the 1655, I've taken vacations to Rome and Jamaica and so forth. I just think the prices of Rolex watches have gotten stupid. The Steinharts are amazing watches.
ugly Cyclops but other than it is a beauty but it s still kinda expensive and too big for my 6,7" wrist
I bought a 2021 Sub date and the explorer 2 a couple months apart. I just sold the Sub because I don’t wear it. The Explorer stands out to me. Everyone wants to look like the Sub. The Explorer has its own style. And I have 8 inch wrists. Even the 41 mm Sub looked small
On me compared to the explorer that looks perfect to me. It’s my daily. Good video Britt. Don’t forget about us big wristers. We get forgot about in the the watch world on the race to make everything 38mm
Its too big
Another fantastic video Britt! You ha e truly become one of those watch TH-camr I subscribe to, whose videos I look forward to and whose opinion and thoughts I think are wonderfully constructed and I value! This watch though....this watch is my grail watch. I'm not a Rolex fan, never really have been but once I saw the Explorer 2 with a polar dial out in the wild and I've wanted it ever since! I think it's one of those perfect do it all watches you can go adventuring with, or take out on date night or to church! I truly truly love it! Great video as always!
Whaaat! OK. FIRST OF ALL! Thank you soooo so much! My head isn’t going to be able to fit through the door! 🤣 I’m so glad you’re enjoying my weird little channel! 💕 I have been trying to make each video a little better than the last!
Now! The Explorer 2 is a very worthwhile grail! 😍😍 the polar dial just has such a great summer time feel to it, it looks good with everything, I love the orange against the white dial! 😍 just *chef kiss*
If it was 40mm it would be more popular. 16570 ALL DAY EVERYDAY 🙌🏼🔥
This and the Black Bay Pro are two of my favourites
Most folks don’t realise that it is the one model that does not come in precious metals or bi metal. Or in different dial variations. It makes this watch special that it’s the one model that Rolex won’t create a bejeweled gold sissy sports watch.
It was underrated maybe 2 years ago. Now it's hyped. The polar is very hyped. The black is slightly underrated but still in demand. I also find that the omega SMP 300M 42mm case and lug width wears better than the explorer with similar dimensions. I think it's the more turned down lyre style lugs that make it a a slightly conforming fit, I feel like the explorer 2 has more lug overhang than the SMP 300M.
My grail used to be the polar exp2 but i cant afford that 9.5k price so i went with the Black bay pro and absolutely love it. I dont think i settled at all too. As we've said, todays Tudors are rolex of many years ago, being amazing quality proper tool watches!
You think?! Idk! I don’t work for Rolex! 😅 but one of my ADs said it was quite low demand! Particularly for a professional model. But maybe it’s just not popular in Bristol! 😅
I think specifically the black is probably in much lower demand, but the polar is super hot, atleast from what I've seen on social media, youtube,, and talking to ADs.
Give us a quartz GS Britney pretty please 😁
I dislike the bezel and I think that’s what part of reason it’s unpopular 🤔Rolex has many more aesthetically attractive choices like GMTs and Subs or even Sea Dwellers
People hate it now.....
Meaning in a few years it'll skyrocket in value once people realize they want it again LOL.
I think it's safe to say that this is the last true tool watch from Rolex. They don't offer it in precious metal, there're no polished center links and it's far less blingy than many other pieces in the modern Rolex lineup. It would be awesome if they brought the Explorer 2 back in 40mm.
I just picked one of these up in happy I got this over a gmt master I would have scratched it to pieces
Why doesn't it have triplock crown? I would smash but I go swimming ever summer with my Rolley on so I need the reassurance of triplock crown. Great video
I swam and dived regularly wearing it with no issues whatsoever.
@@watchpapi I swim HARD
@@PapriceP 💪🏽
As someone with an 8.5" wrist I would absolutely love to wear a larger Explorer II. I like it's understated functionality and that it isn't flashy. I like to wear my watches daily regardless of what I'm doing and to me it looks like an Explorer II would keep up with the demands of that. It doesn't hurt that they are a bit cheaper too. I like the black dial to be honest, just love a high visibility high contrast dial.
Too big and kinda ugly. If I were to go spelunking I'd wear a G-Shock square with the lighted display. But it's the Rolex name on the dial we pay for, so if it's worth it to you, by all means rock this cave dweller beast 😊
My heart still goes out to the Polar 16570. It's a nice pre-owned piece that I have gotten off someone from a watch forum and refurbished by Rolex Service Centre. It's totally toolish and understated at the same time. I have nothing against the Black Dial variant, just that the White Dial flutters my heart much more 😊
Agree 100% I was lucky to find a 2009 BNOS 5 digit polar a few years back. It’s the perfect tool watch. Understated, functional and goes with anything.
Yes. I agree that white polar dial is way to go, given that most sports models have black dials, how boring! Why can't they come up with white dialed sub or GMT? I would love to see the black ceramic bezel on a white dial, besides the Daytona!
The 5 digit cases wear sooooo much better too! Which is part of the whole understated package
It does not scream MONEY. Often we see those SS well worn and scratched to hell and back.
It's not an eye pleaser for sure.
Back then the price was right. Now it's too basic to be a winner in this price range.
I had the explorer 2 polar dial (42mm) on my wrist and found it too large as it being a grail watch I was disappointed. Still came out with a Tudor pro though. My wrist size is 7.25 inches.
Ahhh! The Tudor pro proportions are PERFECT!
@@BrittPearceWatches Was not impressed with Pro online but seeing it in Goldsmiths tried it on fell in love with it.
Are you going to talk about the new Tissot prx 35mm Powermatic that just got released? 😊
Maybe a hands on review?
As a fellow member of the small wrist committee Id love to hear your opinion on it!
For me, it's just too big. If it were available in a 38mm, it would be amazing....as it is...not so much.
Thanks for the video Britt.
RIGHT?! I feel exactly the same!!! Who knows! Maybe for watches and wonders 2024 they’ll bring the size back down?! 😱 they’ve been doing a lot of downsizing! But I don’t think that will happen 😅 they’d have to make an entirely new movement!
yep and that's why I'm on the lookout for the older 5 digit 16570 Explorer II. Tried on the 216570 and 226570, while 42mm might not sound huge, these watches wear large on the wrist.
@@lettuce1305 had the 226570 white, they wear big interns of width though. so for 6.5" wrist its just wearable fine.great lume, weight, movement and case finishing. bracelet best in the biz also
Oh Britt, you’re bringing out the boomer in me. Hilariously happy for you, and may your marriage keep getting better. Canadians can’t sing, bring it on Murray and Adams
My favorite, first, and currently only Rolex. My favorite for several of the reasons you described. Primarily, it's the last real tool watch they make; built for a specific purpose, tool first. Most elect for the fancier, more colorful GMT II, but there's something about the simple noble elegance of the last true Rolex tool watch.
Also, I DO use the day/night aspect of it. I do landscape photography as a serious hobby. Occasionally, I go to Iceland or other Arctic Circle regions at times of the year when the sun is fully above or below the horizon for the full 24 hours. Obviously the sky gives me a clue as to daytime/nighttime, but it's still nice to use it for its intended purpose!
As much as I hate Rolex the only one I would ever own would be an older, when they were still cool and a little smaller, Explorer ll white dial. On a strap of course. No bracelet. I am not a woman.
I really wanted something i do not see everyday. Submariners are amazing and iconic but are everywhere. I very rarely see the exp 2. I love the exp 2 and specifically asked for the black dial. Just a preference over the white and i think that is what makes this hobby so great. Everyone can wear what speaks to them. The exp 2 gets a lot of compliments and sparks conversation with other watch peeps. It always starts with how rarely if ever people see the watch.
Very true in fact the only Rolex I have ever seen out and about on someone’s wrists had been a sub
This watch is probably so undesirable because Rolex completely cocked up the dial redesign from the original 1655. Yes, the 1655 Explorer II was originally intended for cave-diving, and the original dial had 24 markers (for a separate 24-hour hand). There were NO jumping hands, so a user would adjust the regular hour hand and 24-hour hand concurrently. Thus, the 1655 was NOT designed to be a GMT watch and couldn't be used as a GMT watch (unless you were cave diving in the UK)!
Although that original dial looks very bizarre, it is actually very straightforward and useful when looking at it at night. However, Rolex probably should have simply put an AM/PM indicator on the original model instead of a 24 hour indicator. By redesigning the dial to have only 12 rounded markers, Rolex completely destroyed the link between form and function of the original 1655. In my opinion, this current Explorer II should be permanently discontinued for redundancy (i.e. Rolex already has the GMT Master II with the jumping hour hand and GMT hand).
Honestly, I never knew (or even thought about the use of) about the day and night use of the 24 hour hand. I've never needed to keep track of a second time zone which has made me steer away from GMT watches. Now I actually have a use of that extra hand. Thanks Britt ❤️💜
If I was going to buy a Rolex. It’s probably the one I’d buy. But I prefer Tudor.
Can't wait for the next video when your husband magically has an 8-inch wrist! 😂
🤷🏻🤣🤣
🤣🤣 RIGHT?!! This time next year “here it is on my husbands 13 inch wrist”
@@BrittPearceWatches I’m a growing lad!
First Rolex was a black dial 16570. I miss it very much. One day I’m going to buy me another 16570. This time I’m going to get the “Polar” dial.
I love this too, but I’ve never understood weather it is because it’s not so popular or because it’s very good in itsef
Right?! It’s actually a lot of watch! It kinda feels un-Rolex and SOOO ROLEX all at the same time!
@@BrittPearceWatches Absolutely, very well put. It would however be more compelling in the 40mm case with the latest movement and the latest GMT hand (can’t do this without a gripe or two, sorry 😂)
Sizing and who knows why Rolex doesnt offer glidelock on all their tool watches......
I love my Explorer ll white dial even with a 6" wrist. Very comfortable and I certainly don't think it's bulky at all. I certainly like the satin look on the bracelet as it hides any marks. I only waited 3 month's for mine which I was quite surprised with.
The satin look on the bracelet is soooo good! 😍👏🏻 like butter!
WOOOW! Only 3 months wait! That is soo good! You’ve got a very good AD 👏🏻💕
@@BrittPearceWatches It sure is.
@watchgringa Yeah, I couldn't believe it when I got the call. Just waiting on a Batman now. Was told next year, but im happy to wait.
Yeah nah. I get it, but this model always seemed like two different watches smushed together. Not my cup-o-joe.
The Explorer and Explorer 2 in all of the variants will forever epitomized Rolex in my mind. They are the ultimate tool watches, not quite minimalistic but close. They perform the job without much bling. Great video, Britt.
It’s comically large now. Should be 38mm. Until then, it’s a miss
Completely agree with the sizing being a primary reason the Exp. 2 is “underrated.” In a vaccum, the Explorer 2 is great. But for most people, the GMT line wears much better. The subs wear better, too. That’s subjective, but I think the objective sales data bears that out.
I completely agree, if the Exp II comes in 40mm it would be a huge seller, however that may take away some of the sales for the GMT even though they're still different.
The big red daytona is ugly for my eyes, the explorer 2 looks nicer. So sitting at the window for 6 years not surprising at all.
Love the content Britt.
For someone who might already own an Explorer (I), instead of going for an Explorer II, they might try the Grand Seiko SBGN005. GS took a lot of the Explorer II design, finished it well and powered it with a high accuracy quartz. A fraction of the Explorer II price and helps add a little something different to ones collection. But of course, it’s not a Rolex :-). Cheers.
VERY WELL SAID!!! One of my all time favourite GS watches!!! I neeeeed to get a SBGN005 in to review!! That would be a BANGER!
@@BrittPearceWatches The (pricier) GS SBGE283 or 285 are an excellent spring drive alternative. Was tempted to go for the black (283) as a stopgap until my Exp 2 arrives, but went with the BB Pro. If only GS had put the power reserve on the back.
Hey Britt, I see you’ve commandeered your husband’s Pepsi! Don’t give my wife any ideas 😂 she’ll never pry mine out of my hands 🙏🏼
I'm 'on the list' for one at my AD. I think the main reason is definitely the size. If they'd gone back to 40mm at the last update there'd be a lot more demand.
Last time I tried one on I was wearing my Speedy Pro, and this was noticeably larger due to the increased lug-to-lug. The relatively small thickness helps a lot though.
Black over the polar dial, as it's less like a saucer on your wrist.
I'm not sure what it is about the 6 digit ExpII, they do wear larger than other 42mm watches. It looks and wears larger than the Speedy Pro.
RIGHT?! I completely agree on the 40mm!! I like the fantasise for watches and wonders 2024, they will bring it back down to 40mm 🙈 but I don’t think it’ll happen!
you can get the 16570 which wears like 40mm , more vintage plus a red rather than orange gmt hand, cool
@@emc14000I do like the 16570, and would definitely go with the polar with this model. However, a 2010/11 (with the text on the rehaut) is the one I’d want, and they’re expensive. Plus I prefer the orange GMT hand.
@@BrittPearceWatches Rolex, if you’re reading (of course they are), Explorer in 36 & 40 is done, so how about offering the Exp 2 in 39 and 42? Pretty please.
Explorer 2 is unpopular? Since when? I definitely would not say it’s unpopular
I went to my AD a few years ago to see a 2000 Sub/Date, and tried on a 2000 Explorer2/Black (16570). It just melted onto my 6-5/8” wrist. I liked the fact that you didn’t see this one too often in the wild and it had a more slender profile, lighter feel, small crown, gmt hand, and the steel bezel gave it a tool, yet elegant look. I left the AD with the Explorer2.
It's a MAN's watch lol. Love the black dial. I have one on order - wish me luck!
I really like the Black Dial over the white, after having the 124270, I plan on purchasing one of these next.
RIGHT?! I’m glad to find a fellow black-dial-lover! You have to let me know when this next purchase comes!
Doesn’t the 6-18 month wait list kinda refute the premise of the video? I guess it’s all relative, but I imagine that every other brand would kill to have an underperforming model with wait list.
Because they are too bulky. Theres no need for them to be 42mm. They should be at 39 or 40mm max.
I so agree!
That's why the bbpro is perfect (maybe a mm or 2 too thick lol) but yeah perfect
42mm sports watch too bulky 😂
@@luismartinez3016 i tried the black bay pro. Despite what everyones saying, the height kills the watch. Its the case where as soon as tudor produces a slimmer gmt movement, the black bay pro would fly out of my watch box because id ditch it for the "black bay pro mk II" I guess within the next 2 or 3 years, tudor will be able to produce such a movement.
@@seanp7871 yeah you know, nobody ever could tell me why its logical that a so called "sports watch" is heavy and bulky as they sometimes are nowadays. Maybe you need compensation for a small wiener though.
It’s ugly. If I want a GMT then I’ll get the GMT Master II. Beautiful!
If you think the 1991 vintage hurts, try that being the year of high school graduation. 😩 On an Explorer II note, the 226570 being the 50h anniversary model means it comes from the same era I do, which was one small reason I went with one for my big birthday. It is my celebration only Rolex. Yes, I went with the bog model, though it seems dwarfed by the current Sea Dweller on my 7.25” wrist. I loved the SD, but just don’t think I would find it comfortable as a daily with that heft. Sized for my wrist, my Explorer II is 152 grams, which isn’t terrible. I have a 39.5mm Seiko Alpinist on Strapcode bracelet that is 140g. It definitely doesn’t disappear on the wrist, but I don’t need it to. I own other watches for that. The size definitely isn’t for everyone, but I think it would be silly if almost all Rolexes were around some “ideal” size for everyone. I love that my Rolex is not common and is the last full tool watch Rolex. I see Submariners very frequently, but I have only seen one other Explorer II out in public in over 4 years, which would have been a 216570. I do like the polar dial, but felt the black dial was more versatile and better as my only Rolex. I would own both if I could.
I don’t know if the Explorer II is quite as unknown as they must have been back in the 1655 days. Look at how much those go for now! Not even in the attainable range for me, and I personally wouldn’t feel comfortable with a vintage watch worth so much on my wrist. One AD I spoke with said they sold maybe 5 in the previous year, and this is in a very large metro area. Definitely not a high volume watch. My AD expected mine to take at least a year to get, but it showed up in 5 months. My AD rep still tells me how cool he thinks it is that I got that over what everyone else gets. Another rep on site when I picked up mine had a black 16570 on and let me try it on and compare the two. I get why people like that size, and the owner wasn’t a big guy. He’s owned it for 22 years and said although it had never been serviced, it still kept great time. That kind of testament is one reason people are willing to pay for these watches. Anyway, thanks for listening to me ramble about this great watch, and thanks for giving it some rare attention in one of your down to earth videos.
Your husband's measurements (who claims what and any growth potential) should be strictly the family business LOL
No apologies ever needed for Rolex content, Britt :) I'd like a polar dial 16570, but the current model wears very large (larger than its stated dimensions) and does not interest me. Cheers!
I'm also on the hunt for a 16570 Polar, I have tried both the 216570 and 226570 white and black dials, they somehow wear larger than other 42mm watches I've tried.
This model looks really weird compared to the other sports models from Rolex. The 24 h mechanism of the second hour hand is also something that hardly no one ever will utilise. So all in all it is a solid watch but will never be as popular as a sub or a gmt. 😊
The flow, transitions, and overall production value were exceptional for this video. Not sure you did anything different, but this one just hit on all cylinders.
Love the story of your attachment to the watch! Great way you, specifically, differentiate as a content creator.
On the actual watch, this is IMO perhaps the best Rolex sports model. The black dial, the orange hand, the iconic markers & hands, and a cyclops! Definitely for me this watch far above the more ubiquitous 3/6/9 traditional Explorer.
Now this comment has completely made my day! 1. SALTY IS IN THE HOUSE!!! 💕👏🏻 2. Thank you sooo so much! I really have been trying to work on my video flow and pacing! I’ve been experimenting with how long I leave different B-rolls up!! And how things transition! I am soo glad it is showing! 💕 I’m still a work in progress. 🙈 but trying to get better with every video!
And 3. The Explorer 2 is such a unique watch in the Rolex catalogue isn’t it?! Tool watch goodness. Great functionality! It is just *chef kiss*
My game plan is a black dial Explorer and a white dial Explorer II. Dream reasonably, kids, and those dreams will all come true.
I hope I don’t offend anyone but I just don’t like the explorer… 😬
Last week I bought my first Rolex from an AD. I got the Submariner two tone and that is much more my style.
But…. I can absolutely understand that the explorer is THE Rolex for someone else. Buy and wear what you like 🤩