Comment that has only a polemical goal and that brings absolutely nothing but to rehash the same old stories. Just follow the film of the stage to get the answer.
@@MIROIRDUCYCLISME Isn't that what you're doing? Except in your case you present these 'events' as legitimate. Such a 'polemic' is as much a part of Tour history as suppressing this parallax view. Think back to the famous 'convicts of the road' interviews of the 1920's with the Pelisier brothers.
Fignon à la ramasse, Lemond qui abandonne... Qu'il est loin le Tour 89.
How on earth did Hampsten manage to win this stage against a plethora of dopers.
Comment that has only a polemical goal and that brings absolutely nothing but to rehash the same old stories. Just follow the film of the stage to get the answer.
@@MIROIRDUCYCLISME Isn't that what you're doing? Except in your case you present these 'events' as legitimate. Such a 'polemic' is as much a part of Tour history as suppressing this parallax view. Think back to the famous 'convicts of the road' interviews of the 1920's with the Pelisier brothers.
@@EMC2Scotia One again: look at the summary of the stage before saying bullshit!
@@apoire44 where is this summary?
@@EMC2Scotia The video