Always liked the twist that Charlie does reject the offer at first. Wonka wanted to isolate him (in retrospect really creepy) but Charlie turned him down, choosing his family over riches. And it was neat that the Buckets kinda lifted themselves out of poverty, independent of Wonka; I liked seeing Charlie's dad studying mechanical engineering in the background during the ticket hunt.
Reminds me of one of my favourite exchanges in the movie. Wonka: "(Families are) always telling you what to do and what not to do and it's not conducive to a creative atmosphere!" Charlie: "Usually they're just trying to protect you, because they love you."
The only part of the movie I remember was when Wonka got in an argument with his dad and left home and his dad said "Fine, but I will not be here if you come back" and when Wonka returned the whole house was gone.
To this day, I'm still wondering about that scene. How is that even possible? I mean, it's one thing if Wonka returned and simply didn't find his dad still residing there, but he returned and find the whole freaking house cleanly disappeared in between other houses. It's like it's been teleported somehow. It also didn't make sense storywise, isn't his dad just a simple dentist instead of tech-wizardry of some sort?
@@ahmadraihan797This is a world where whipped cream comes from whipped cows. If somebody says he’s not going to be there, he’s not going to be there in the most absurd way possible.
I always remember that Marylin Manson desperately wanted the role of Wonka. I assume the conversation went: Producer guy: "No, we're trying to appeal to children." Manson: "What? I can be child friendly!" Producer guy: "If you just showed up in public without all the goth make up and just looking like your normal self, you would still give kids nightmares."
Funny thing is Manson (without costume) just looks like a typical Hollywood burnout/washup these days. Looks older than he should, more wrinkles, more sags, darker bags under his eyes. Drugs are a helluva drug, kids.
The irony is that aside from the whole backstory for Wonka, this version is actually more accurate to the book overall than the original. Got to take the bad with the good I guess!
"So strap in for a charming family film that doesn't really like children, overweight people, and foreigners." So, pretty much true to both Roald Dahl's writing and the original movie! Also my soul exited my body when I realized that this movie came out almost twenty years ago and Charlie and Violet's actors both have thriving adult careers in Hollywood now.
Random fun fact that I found absolutely fascinating is that those squirrels were NOT CGI! They were just really highly trained, so everything they did with sorting the nuts was completely real. So cool!
I still think the Gene Wilder version is better, but I still love this one. Tim Burton's style is always fun to see, Danny Elfman's score is great, and the darker tone is more accurate to the book. I do feel even worse for the Oompa Loompas in this one though.
IIRC, Wonka in the book is very unsettling, so Depp's performance was closer to that than Wilder's (Wilder was great though, I wasn't saying otherwise).
It will forever be ironic that _"Willy Wonka" and the Chocolate Factory_ focused on Charlie while _"Charlie" and the Chocolate Factory_ focused on Wonka.
No, any movie Depp is in focuses on Depp. 'Dark Shadows' 'Alice in Wonderland' staring the mad hatter, 'Lone Ranger' etc. all of Depps movies in the last 20 years are Johnny Depp playing Johnny Depp.
The first one was only named Willy Wonka and… because Dahl disliked it for being too light and cheesy. His books were supposed to have a dark side. His family thought the Burton version captured that better so let him use the original name.
I mean they trained actual squirrels and made animatronic ones, the entire candy room was real including the river, and the Oompa Loompas were mostly done via forced perspectives but sure let's all just remember the CGI. Because why appreciate the work that went into all of this
The scene of Charlie looking at all the newspaper clippings that Willy's dad kept over the years is one of the most touching scenes in a movie for me. I've been asking for months now, can we please get a trailer for seasons 2 and 3 of the Boys before season 4 comes out?
Burton claimed that was inspired by how when he visited his estranged mother on her deathbed, she’d kept newspaper clippings documenting his entire career.
Yeah Wonka is meant to be creepy and unsettling. Wilder did try to embody that during the moments when the character loses his cool, but otherwise didn't. Depp kept up the disturbing element more consistently.
Yes! Ronald Dahl did not write delightful children's stories. He wrote cruel and whimsical tales about the cruelty of adults toward children. And kids love it. The 70s movie sanded off too many edges. And if we're going to talk about empty protagonists, at least Freddie Highmore has screen presence
A) I actually really like this movie, even without "pure imagination". This movie really does not deserve the hate it gets. Like come on, the one there is a good remake B) While I also enjoyed the wonka movie for the most part, I certainly prefer the dentist origin story over the whimsicle version of the wonka movie. It's just more unique and kinda funny that he basicly became a candy master out of spite. XD
I'll always have a huge soft spot for this movie. So many great moments and quotable lines. It's just so bonkers, I love it. And Danny Elfman's score. I mean come on, it goes so hard.
Except Tim Burton used almost no CGI, and Roald Dahl's widow helped produced this movie because Roald hated the Willy Wonka movie. This movie sticks to the book more.
Funnily enough this movie is actually closer to the book than "Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory." Besides the added flashback stuff, and Charlie rejecting the offer at first.
Me too. I love this version and I don't much care for the first one. I'll watch it now and then but it annoys me every time I see Charle's grandad just tell him to break the rules and he does. The OG premise was he would never do that.
Same. I don't remember when I last saw Willy Wonka, but I saw this so much! I have forgotten I saw Willy Wonka version! I grew up with Both and I prefer Charlie.
2:05-Tim Burton Easter Egg: Smilex (Batman) to anyone that might correct me that its spelled with Y not I I'll admit my bad but its a reference to one of his works which is Batman
CGI was actually used sparingly in this movie (for example, the most of the Loompah’s are the same actor who’s just been recorded doing the same thing in a different position over and over again)
Gum chewing's fine when it's once in a while. It stops you from smoking and brightens your smile. But it's repulsive, revolting, and wrong chewing and chewing all day long. The way that a cow does. 😉
I can't believe it needs to be pointed out at this late date, but Depp's Wonka was not based on Michael Jackson at all, but on Mr. Teatime (pronounced Teh-ah-tim-eh) from Terry Pratchett's Hogfather movie
if anything, shouldn't charlie's grandparents be sloth? grandpa joe couldn't walk for years while his son and his wife slaved to keep them alive, but now that he can tour a chocolate factory he's jumping and dancing?
except the gene wilder one isn't "the original one". the book is, and this adaptation is a lot more faithful to the book than the other movie. in fact, even the author of the books hated the first movie, since they made that Wonka way too likeable, compared to how he was portrayed in the book.
Roald Dahl actually hated the Jean Wilder movie. It had nothing to do with his book, and it was basically an overproduced commercial for Nestle's new Wonka line of candy The new one is basically a word for word remake of the book
"keeping 4 pensioners locked up in bed should get them £3000 a month" You'd think it would work that way, but honestly town councils here in the UK will do anything to not give families the support they need
The video is fun, but it warms my heart to see how many people wrote about their love for the movie in the comments. This film is the beginning of my love for filmmaking
Maybe the writers were trying to tell us something we already knew. Grooming kids into his own twisted image, the 'prize' if you could prove you were virtuous was to sleep overnight forever... Wait, am I talking about Wonka or MJ?
Why would anyone on a compare an eccentric pale guy who runs a chocolate factory and turns kids into blueberries to an eccentric pale guy who builds a theme park in his backyard and dangles babies over balconies... Okay, I get it.
I don't care what anyone says, I love this adaptation. Especially since I heard that this one is much closer to the source material. (Wonka's backstory, which is not from the book, can be a bit odd though I admit)
5:37 Sure, that might be hilarious in FUTURE court, but since Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was set in the 1920s, you would need to reflect on laws from that era, when many of the Central Powers from WWI had to give up their colonies. After all, who knows how many laws we've broken in 2123.
IDC what nobody says I loved the Johnny Depp version, the Gene Wilder version creeped me out but Johnnys awkwardness is kinda endearing and fits the vibe of Wonka in the book🙌🏾‼️
I enjoyed both films, but don't agree. The only one thing I don't like about Depps version is that Willy Wonka isn't supposed to hate kids. Ive watched this film more but that one aspect of the character irked me
I always enjoyed this one more than the original. it also brings me memories of the first time I watched it in the theater on ecstacy. I still watch it from time to time now and still love it, sober of course. lol
God, it’s so relieving to know other people share this opinion. I thought I just had awful taste for years but I love the way this one expands on Wonka’s personality and embraces the absurdity of Roald Dahl’s humor while still making the chocolate factory almost look like it could work.
@@SomewhatSlightlyBoredDahl refused the sequel book to be adapted because he didn’t like the Gene Wilder movie. That’s why this one lacks the sequel hook.
I wholeheartedly agree, especially since it was a pretty faithful adaptation of the source material. I guarantee most Wilder Stans haven't read the book.
People usually only love the remakes of beloved classics if its close enough to the original to remind them of it, otherwise they just don't like it by default. This one is just too different to the original film for some to get behind. I peronsally love this version, love both of them, but this one has a special place in my heart cause I saw it first.
Ok ok ok ok, I have no doubt that this is gonna be anti-this movie since this movie always gets poo pooed on for being so different from the Gene Wilder version, but taken on its own merits instead of insisting it has to be just like the original film, this movie is pretty good.
Let’s just admit it. We’re here to watch honest trailers the same way we still hang out with that one friend that we’ve outgrown but don’t have the courage to break up with them. And it’s all Pitch meeting’s fault. It just hits so different ever since it became super easy, barely an inconvenience.
I find the comparison between Willy Wonka and this really interesting. The former being a timeless classic despite not being faithful to the book and the latter is more faithful to the book but is… not a timeless classic.
Always liked the twist that Charlie does reject the offer at first. Wonka wanted to isolate him (in retrospect really creepy) but Charlie turned him down, choosing his family over riches. And it was neat that the Buckets kinda lifted themselves out of poverty, independent of Wonka; I liked seeing Charlie's dad studying mechanical engineering in the background during the ticket hunt.
I blame Batman for putting Mr. Bucket out of a job by killing the CEO of the Smilex corporation. >:(
He had failed this city.
lol hey Vantas! and yeah I agree with you, this movie is a lot better than most people give it credit
They conveniently ignored that fact in this video because it would undermine their narrative that the 73 movie is better in every way.
Reminds me of one of my favourite exchanges in the movie.
Wonka: "(Families are) always telling you what to do and what not to do and it's not conducive to a creative atmosphere!"
Charlie: "Usually they're just trying to protect you, because they love you."
Ironically, if each of the kids embodies one of the deadly sins (minus Lust, of course), Charlie would embody Envy.
Sloth is the kid that didnt show up. :P
Or maybe that's Wonka
@@Heavenlyhounds96oh my God this is hilarious
Grandpa Joe is sloth
😮
@@Heavenlyhounds96 I thought that was mike tv
"You're the worst chocolatier I've ever heard of."
Depp: But you have heard of me...
based wonka
In Cap's voice "I got the reference"
"Willy Wonka ? You're the best chocolatier anyone has ever heard of !"
"But you have... eh... fine."
BEST comment
seeing the “I am a surgeon” meme in actual video form for the first time was a whiplash of an experience
LIVE JOHNNY GAT REACTION
(Daniel Dae Kim, who was Dr. Han in that scene, also was the voice of Johnny Gat in the Saints Row series)
you hadn't seen it but had heard of the meme?
FRR
I was even more suprised to learn they're the same actor 🤣🤣
@@TychoVan the meme was everywhere when it first happened but just never seen the clip
The only part of the movie I remember was when Wonka got in an argument with his dad and left home and his dad said "Fine, but I will not be here if you come back" and when Wonka returned the whole house was gone.
To this day, I'm still wondering about that scene. How is that even possible? I mean, it's one thing if Wonka returned and simply didn't find his dad still residing there, but he returned and find the whole freaking house cleanly disappeared in between other houses. It's like it's been teleported somehow. It also didn't make sense storywise, isn't his dad just a simple dentist instead of tech-wizardry of some sort?
@ahmadraihan797 its fiction, it doesnt matter 'how' it happened....
@@ahmadraihan797He's a wizard. Sir Christopher Lee can do whatever he wants
@@ahmadraihan797This is a world where whipped cream comes from whipped cows. If somebody says he’s not going to be there, he’s not going to be there in the most absurd way possible.
@@waltascher I usually really hate that argument, though at least it is consistent with the film's atmosphere.
I always remember that Marylin Manson desperately wanted the role of Wonka.
I assume the conversation went:
Producer guy: "No, we're trying to appeal to children."
Manson: "What? I can be child friendly!"
Producer guy: "If you just showed up in public without all the goth make up and just looking like your normal self, you would still give kids nightmares."
I mean between Gene Wilder and Johnny Depp's depictions, I would think they wanted to give children nightmares
@@battlesheep2552 they wanted to make children learn that you don't follow the man that offers candy
Id you look for the video for Dope Hat by Marilyn Manson you could get a glimpse although very low budget of what he wanted to do with the character
Funny thing is Manson (without costume) just looks like a typical Hollywood burnout/washup these days. Looks older than he should, more wrinkles, more sags, darker bags under his eyes.
Drugs are a helluva drug, kids.
He knew that, thus the scary make up. So he could pretend...
The irony is that aside from the whole backstory for Wonka, this version is actually more accurate to the book overall than the original. Got to take the bad with the good I guess!
Counterpoint: Christopher Lee nullifies “the bad”
so the book sucks?
@@noitallmanazI mean it’s a weird book
True. Roald Dahl hated the 70s movie. I assume he would have liked this one better if he was alive to see it.
YEP
"So strap in for a charming family film that doesn't really like children, overweight people, and foreigners." So, pretty much true to both Roald Dahl's writing and the original movie! Also my soul exited my body when I realized that this movie came out almost twenty years ago and Charlie and Violet's actors both have thriving adult careers in Hollywood now.
"You get nothing. You lose. Good day, sir!"
I said good day!
"Everything in this room is eatable, even I'm eatable, but that is called cannibalism my dear children and is in fact frowned upon in most societies."
@@bucketofsunshine6366
"But Fez"
Random fun fact that I found absolutely fascinating is that those squirrels were NOT CGI! They were just really highly trained, so everything they did with sorting the nuts was completely real. So cool!
I still think the Gene Wilder version is better, but I still love this one. Tim Burton's style is always fun to see, Danny Elfman's score is great, and the darker tone is more accurate to the book. I do feel even worse for the Oompa Loompas in this one though.
Agreed
Seş
And glad they got at least one other thing right the Wilder didn't (The Great Glass Elevator)
IIRC, Wonka in the book is very unsettling, so Depp's performance was closer to that than Wilder's (Wilder was great though, I wasn't saying otherwise).
I saw Tim's first so for me it will always be the better one, Ive seen the Wilder one but it obviously very different, I really enjoyed the Burton on
It will forever be ironic that _"Willy Wonka" and the Chocolate Factory_ focused on Charlie while _"Charlie" and the Chocolate Factory_ focused on Wonka.
No, any movie Depp is in focuses on Depp. 'Dark Shadows' 'Alice in Wonderland' staring the mad hatter, 'Lone Ranger' etc. all of Depps movies in the last 20 years are Johnny Depp playing Johnny Depp.
@@FriendofstfrankHe had a small role in Into the Woods.
So, Wonka should focus on the Oompa Loompas
So true!
The first one was only named Willy Wonka and… because Dahl disliked it for being too light and cheesy. His books were supposed to have a dark side. His family thought the Burton version captured that better so let him use the original name.
"Growing up in the reverse beartrap from Saw" made me laugh hahahahah
But on the other hand, he does have perfect teeth now.
I mean they trained actual squirrels and made animatronic ones, the entire candy room was real including the river, and the Oompa Loompas were mostly done via forced perspectives but sure let's all just remember the CGI. Because why appreciate the work that went into all of this
Exactly
Salt Bae
I still find the part when they are in the elevator and he says “puppet hospital and burn centre…it’s relatively new” ridiculously hilarious
I worked in a Theater when this came out.
Imagine seeing this in 5 minute segments throughout your day for like 2 months.
Good GOD 😮
I'm so sorry
It’s a masterpiece, so I wouldn’t complain.
sounds bad
@@SDfan2002 I hope bad things for you
The scene of Charlie looking at all the newspaper clippings that Willy's dad kept over the years is one of the most touching scenes in a movie for me. I've been asking for months now, can we please get a trailer for seasons 2 and 3 of the Boys before season 4 comes out?
They DID make a trailer for seasons 2 & 3 of The Boys. 2 months ago
Burton claimed that was inspired by how when he visited his estranged mother on her deathbed, she’d kept newspaper clippings documenting his entire career.
The sad thing is this version is actually more accurate to the book sans how it ended.
Yeah Wonka is meant to be creepy and unsettling. Wilder did try to embody that during the moments when the character loses his cool, but otherwise didn't. Depp kept up the disturbing element more consistently.
Everybody says that but I read the book and can't see how.
Yes! Ronald Dahl did not write delightful children's stories. He wrote cruel and whimsical tales about the cruelty of adults toward children. And kids love it. The 70s movie sanded off too many edges. And if we're going to talk about empty protagonists, at least Freddie Highmore has screen presence
Also, it looks like there’s loads of cgi, but both the chocolate river and the squirrels were actually on set
Yeah honestly Wonka being a whimsical slightly unhinged manchild makes sense in the context of the candy empire he created
I read the book a few times growing up so I like this version the best, hard to top the OG tho but more liberties were taken with that one.
Genuinely the funniest HT in a while 😂 Wonkonda forever, Saruman the Whitening, Screen Junkie, perfect!
Senile Joe! was pretty good too
"A CANDY CANE!" 😂
Agreed - every single joke landed and was perfect 👏
Can we please get an Honest Trailer for _Gremlins_ before Christmas arrives?
Yes! Please do this!
I second the motion😂
It is in the movie!
This, Polar Express, AND Planes, Trains and Automobiles!
Knowing their track record, it will probably only be Marvel or Star Wars for the next few months.
I've been laughing at "Wonka-da Forever" for the past 10 minutes
I cried and laughed at the same time. Man, I miss T’Challa and Chadwick.
A) I actually really like this movie, even without "pure imagination". This movie really does not deserve the hate it gets. Like come on, the one there is a good remake
B) While I also enjoyed the wonka movie for the most part, I certainly prefer the dentist origin story over the whimsicle version of the wonka movie. It's just more unique and kinda funny that he basicly became a candy master out of spite. XD
Technically it's an adaptation, but yes, I love that part too!
I'll always have a huge soft spot for this movie. So many great moments and quotable lines. It's just so bonkers, I love it. And Danny Elfman's score. I mean come on, it goes so hard.
Except Tim Burton used almost no CGI, and Roald Dahl's widow helped produced this movie because Roald hated the Willy Wonka movie. This movie sticks to the book more.
Funnily enough this movie is actually closer to the book than "Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory."
Besides the added flashback stuff, and Charlie rejecting the offer at first.
I’ve seen this movie like 30 times and I’ll never be bored of it ever
Me too. I love this version and I don't much care for the first one. I'll watch it now and then but it annoys me every time I see Charle's grandad just tell him to break the rules and he does. The OG premise was he would never do that.
same.
it also makes me crave for chocolate
If this was the only movie I could keep in my collection, I'd be a-ok with it!
Same.
I don't remember when I last saw Willy Wonka, but I saw this so much! I have forgotten I saw Willy Wonka version!
I grew up with Both and I prefer Charlie.
They left the part out about how Charlie became Norman Bates, before becoming a surgeon.
Charlie had a much more normal upbringing than Norman
2:05-Tim Burton Easter Egg: Smilex (Batman)
to anyone that might correct me that its spelled with Y not I
I'll admit my bad but its a reference to one of his works which is Batman
CGI was actually used sparingly in this movie (for example, the most of the Loompah’s are the same actor who’s just been recorded doing the same thing in a different position over and over again)
Say: "Chewing Gum is really gross, Chewing Gum I hate the most!"
Gum chewing's fine when it's once in a while. It stops you from smoking and brightens your smile. But it's repulsive, revolting, and wrong chewing and chewing all day long. The way that a cow does. 😉
I can't believe it needs to be pointed out at this late date, but Depp's Wonka was not based on Michael Jackson at all, but on Mr. Teatime (pronounced Teh-ah-tim-eh) from Terry Pratchett's Hogfather movie
Wonka definitely has a pile of children's teeth somewhere in his factory
@@Daft_Vader YES. And the tooth fairy probably
I was going to mention the pronunciation....
But you got there first.
P.S. don't set Banjo, or the Scissorman, on me!@@MrCarlbrooks
Suuuure
He also said he based his performance on George W. Bush if he was stoned.
We need an Honest Trailer for the Polar Express already!
Indeed!
Here here! Agreed!
Hot, hot, hot chocolate, and Fast and Furious: North Pole drift is just lit with this movie.
Starring: The Uncanny Valley.
I can’t wait for them to sing in that one!
It would have been very interesting to hear Dahl himself’s thoughts on this version, especially given he HATED the original.
His family liked it and his wife said her husband would have approved but I would be nice if we could have heard his own words.
Epic voice guy "wow they're pale even by British standards"😂😂😂 said it with such emotion got me rolling on the first line lmao
Some people like milk chocolate (1971 version) and some like dark chocolate (2005 version). And some don’t have to choose and like both 😊
Or neither, but I realize that I am the only one in that department.
@@MaiAoleithat means you have no soul
@@truedarkness4052 That's what those guys said, while they were beating me up after I kicked that puppy.
Veruca also represents greed. Mike also represents sloth.
Greed is Avarice.
And yeah, Mike in the end is arguably Sloth.
This Mike is just full of untreated rage issues
Mike seems like wrath
@@Heavenlyhounds96Avarice is Gluttony Veruca is Greed.
if anything, shouldn't charlie's grandparents be sloth? grandpa joe couldn't walk for years while his son and his wife slaved to keep them alive, but now that he can tour a chocolate factory he's jumping and dancing?
My knowledge of Green Lantern lore, and Larfleeze, says avarice and greed are the same thing.
except the gene wilder one isn't "the original one". the book is, and this adaptation is a lot more faithful to the book than the other movie. in fact, even the author of the books hated the first movie, since they made that Wonka way too likeable, compared to how he was portrayed in the book.
I appreciate this trailer for not making too many comparisons to the first or using subjective words.
Roald Dahl actually hated the Jean Wilder movie. It had nothing to do with his book, and it was basically an overproduced commercial for Nestle's new Wonka line of candy
The new one is basically a word for word remake of the book
Wasn’t it Quaker Oats not nestle
1:44 jesse eisenberg from BvS or Tommy Wiseau’s laugh montage from The Room
We missed out on 1990's Nick Cage being Willy Wonka. Such a shame.
Can you imagine a 90's era Wonka movie with a Nicolas Cage freak out scene? I can.
This adaptation is complete bonkers, and i love it 😂😂
"HBC who appears like beetlejuice when you say Johnny Depps name 3 times " Haha they are in every tim burton movie together.
Deep Roy who played the Oompa Loompas actually played every single one of them in every song, and they were all edited together into one shot
The timing to this is hilarious. Just watched this last night for the first time in like 15 years.
I watched both a couple days ago in prep for the new movie, read the book too so I could compare the three
"keeping 4 pensioners locked up in bed should get them £3000 a month"
You'd think it would work that way, but honestly town councils here in the UK will do anything to not give families the support they need
5:00 Hey I just saw They Live the other day! Now I finally get the reference.
This movie is hugely underrated!
3:27 that's it I'm calling oompaloompa resources
I’m surprised Honest Trailers hadn’t done this earlier.
This one might be more accurate to the book but I still prefer the Gene Wilder version.
madness? THIS! IS! HALLOWEEN!!
I can't wait for when you guys do Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day (2014)
The video is fun, but it warms my heart to see how many people wrote about their love for the movie in the comments. This film is the beginning of my love for filmmaking
no mention that the oompa loompa actors name is literally Deep Roy lmao
1:44 I may have an explanation for this: his dad was constantly putting him under to fix his teeth and so the laughing gas never fully wore off!
I really enjoyed both also
The wakanda forever got me WHEEZING
Would of never noticed if you didn't mention it
“British Dentist” got me
2:31 YO WAIT, THAT'S LITTLE CHARLIE'S ACTOR ! What a career character arc 👀✨️
The sequal looks good
He was also the only beatable person on US taskmaster
So he is MICHAEL JACKSON low key..
Got it!!!😂
Maybe the writers were trying to tell us something we already knew. Grooming kids into his own twisted image, the 'prize' if you could prove you were virtuous was to sleep overnight forever... Wait, am I talking about Wonka or MJ?
Why would anyone on a compare an eccentric pale guy who runs a chocolate factory and turns kids into blueberries to an eccentric pale guy who builds a theme park in his backyard and dangles babies over balconies... Okay, I get it.
I don't care what anyone says, I love this adaptation. Especially since I heard that this one is much closer to the source material. (Wonka's backstory, which is not from the book, can be a bit odd though I admit)
That's the one thing that both films share, beyond The source material, adding in a bizarre subplot. (Both of which were very good BTW)
5:37 Sure, that might be hilarious in FUTURE court, but since Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was set in the 1920s, you would need to reflect on laws from that era, when many of the Central Powers from WWI had to give up their colonies. After all, who knows how many laws we've broken in 2123.
IDC what nobody says I loved the Johnny Depp version, the Gene Wilder version creeped me out but Johnnys awkwardness is kinda endearing and fits the vibe of Wonka in the book🙌🏾‼️
👍
Same
Agreed 😊
I enjoyed both films, but don't agree. The only one thing I don't like about Depps version is that Willy Wonka isn't supposed to hate kids. Ive watched this film more but that one aspect of the character irked me
THANK YOU
Back when I first heard about this I actually thought this was a sequel. With Charlie already owning the factory and passing it onto a new kid.
No that's Snowpiercer (there's a very famous Youtubr video fan theory about that) ;)
@@goodial
Lulyeah reference?
@@HolaMundoTheMisteriousAGNo, the video was by Rhino Stew
4:18 literally my reaction to this film!
I always enjoyed this one more than the original. it also brings me memories of the first time I watched it in the theater on ecstacy. I still watch it from time to time now and still love it, sober of course. lol
from what i know dahl's family preferred this one too. dahl himself wasn't a fan of the original. thought wilder's performance was too mean.
God, it’s so relieving to know other people share this opinion. I thought I just had awful taste for years but I love the way this one expands on Wonka’s personality and embraces the absurdity of Roald Dahl’s humor while still making the chocolate factory almost look like it could work.
Finally someone else who prefers this version, I was feeling like the only one
I agree 100%
@@SomewhatSlightlyBoredDahl refused the sequel book to be adapted because he didn’t like the Gene Wilder movie. That’s why this one lacks the sequel hook.
Unpopular opinion but I actually loved this film. Depp made the character his own, and the camp of it all (including the CGI) seemed quite fitting.
You’d probably be shocked to learn how much of it was done with practical effects
Please do an Honest Trailer for Scrooged
Oh yes, the superior adaptation that people didn't like. Super underrated.
I wholeheartedly agree, especially since it was a pretty faithful adaptation of the source material. I guarantee most Wilder Stans haven't read the book.
Facts.
Depp nailed that role.
If it ain't weird, it ain't Burton.
Still the best adaptation of the book.
I've always loved this version and I never understood the hate.
Same, I really enjoyed the children in it, they were funny and had personality, well Charlie was boring.
People usually only love the remakes of beloved classics if its close enough to the original to remind them of it, otherwise they just don't like it by default. This one is just too different to the original film for some to get behind. I peronsally love this version, love both of them, but this one has a special place in my heart cause I saw it first.
I too love both of them. The remake is actually why I want to make movies
@@rachelroth4239i found out about the original when i was 16 lol
Nostalgia
*Still asking for an HT for "Planes, Trains and Automobiles!" :D*
I was waiting for a LOTR joke about saruman, thanks 😊
This movie was the first Wonka film I saw and I greatly enjoyed it over the original. I also heard it was more accurate to the book,
Ok ok ok ok, I have no doubt that this is gonna be anti-this movie since this movie always gets poo pooed on for being so different from the Gene Wilder version, but taken on its own merits instead of insisting it has to be just like the original film, this movie is pretty good.
It's also a much more faithful adaptation of the original book.
I absolutely love this movie but I also agree that everything in this video is so on point
Say: "A curious bird is a pelican. His beak can hold more than his belly can."
Please do an honest trailer for Scooby-Doo 1 and 2
The best thing about this film is still Kevin Eldon and Mark Heap just randomly appearing in a cameo walking dogs.
"Mumbler!!"
I was waiting for that Michael Jackson reference 😂
The reboot of the reboot of the reboot …
The second adaptation of the novel
1:07 completely made up profession😂😂😂
Depp was doing Michael Jackson for Wonka, while Jesse Eisenberg was doing Depp's Wonka for Lex Luthor in Batman v Superman.
OMG I did not know that the actor that played Charlie Bucket plays the main character in the good doctor!
The actor also played Norman Bates in a t.v. shows called "Bates Motel" a while ago. ❤❤❤ Highly recommend watching it! 😆
2:44 did someone just learn the word Avarice and wanted to use it in a sentence?
2:32 I was today years old when I found out this was the same actor
This was one of my favorite movie remakes💯
2:25 i didn't know that Freddie Highmore played charlie in this film untill i heard it here! 😅
"Wonkandan forever"...I damn near pissed my pants. LOL
5:17 I think it worked! 😂🎉
I unironically love this movie. It's so fucking messed up and weird 😂❤
when Americans try to say something like 'quid' naturally - Im pretty sure it means an angel got their wings... cause I hear a bell ringing
Let’s just admit it. We’re here to watch honest trailers the same way we still hang out with that one friend that we’ve outgrown but don’t have the courage to break up with them. And it’s all Pitch meeting’s fault. It just hits so different ever since it became super easy, barely an inconvenience.
Can you say 'From now on, call me Velvet Thunder. ' In memory of Andre Braugher ❤
We need a Gremlins honest trailer!
I find the comparison between Willy Wonka and this really interesting.
The former being a timeless classic despite not being faithful to the book and the latter is more faithful to the book but is… not a timeless classic.